| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Blood, 1 January 2004, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 110-119. Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on September 4, 2003; DOI 10.1182/blood-2003-04-1115.
HEMATOPOIESIS
Neutrophil-derived MMP-9 mediates synergistic mobilization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by the combination of G-CSF and the chemokines GRO
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/CXCL2 and GRO
T/CXCL2
4 rapidly mobilize PBSC equivalent to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and are synergistic with G-CSF. We now show that mobilization by GRO
/GRO
T and G-CSF, alone or in combination, requires polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN)derived proteases. Mobilization induced by GRO
/GRO
T is associated with elevated levels of plasma and marrow matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) and mobilization and MMP-9 are absent in neutrophil-depleted mice. G-CSF mobilization correlates with elevated neutrophil elastase (NE), cathepsin G (CG), and MMP-9 levels within marrow and is partially blocked by either antiMMP-9 or the NE inhibitor MeOSuc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Val-CMK. Mobilization and protease accumulation are absent in neutrophil-depleted mice. Synergistic PBSC mobilization observed when G-CSF and GRO
/GRO
T are combined correlates with a synergistic rise in the level of plasma MMP-9, reduction in marrow NE, CG, and MMP-9 levels, and a coincident increase in peripheral blood PMNs but decrease in marrow PMNs compared to G-CSF. Synergistic mobilization is completely blocked by antiMMP-9 but not MeOSuc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Val-CMK and absent in MMP-9deficient or PMN-depleted mice. Our results indicate that PMNs are a common target for G-CSF and GRO
/GRO
T-mediated PBSC mobilization and, importantly, that synergistic mobilization by G-CSF plus GRO
/GRO
T is mediated by PMN-derived plasma MMP-9. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-integrin (very late activation antigen 4 [VLA-4]) or its receptor (vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 [VCAM-1]).17,18 Mobilization kinetics are variable, requiring multiday dosing with G-CSF, GM-CSF, interleukin 3 (IL-3), chimeric growth factors, and anti-integrin/receptor antibodies or continuous adenoviral production in the case of IL-17 and stromal cellderived factor-1
(SDF-1
/CXCL12). In contrast, PBSC mobilization occurs within hours with sulfated glycans or a matter of minutes with the CXC chemokines IL-8/CXCL8, GRO
/CXCL2 or GRO
T/CXCL2
4. Differing kinetics by agents with distinct structures, specificities, and half-lives suggest that multiple mechanisms may be responsible for mobilization or alternatively the agents act indirectly, triggering common events.
Clinically, G-CSF is the predominant PBSC mobilizer based on potency, predictability, and safety.1,19-22 However, poor mobilization is observed in 25% of patients and 10% to 20% of healthy donors.23-25 Mobilization induced by G-CSF can be augmented to various degrees by IL-3,8 stem cell factor (SCF),26,27 Flt3 ligand,28 chemotherapy,29,30 and antiVLA-4/intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) antibodies,16,17 but requires multiday administration of both agents. We previously demonstrated that a single dose of the CXCR2-selective chemokines GRO
and GRO
T synergistically enhance HSC mobilization when used in combination with various G-CSF dosing regimens.9,31 The addition of a mobilizer with rapid kinetics to standard or reduced-dose G-CSF regimens is clinically attractive.
Recent studies have begun to identify mechanisms associated with PBSC mobilization. We previously described a transient increase in plasma matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) that precedes GRO
T-induced mobilization and that administration of antiMMP-9 blocks mobilization.9,31 Similarly, antiMMP-9 blocks mobilization induced by IL-8.32 Sulfated glycans elevate levels of plasma IL-8, MMP-9, and SDF-1
that are only partially blocked by antiSDF-1,33 suggesting that IL-8 or MMP-9 or both are involved.16 In addition, HSC recruitment by chemotherapy or G-CSF is impaired in MMP-9/ mice.34 G-CSF administration results in elevated levels of neutrophil elastase (NE) and cathepsin G (CG) in the bone marrow extravascular compartment of mice that correlates with reduction in VCAM-1 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming unit (CFU-GM) mobilization,35,36 which may be mediated by NE degradation of marrow SDF-1
.37 In this report we investigated molecular and cellular mechanisms responsible for synergistic PBSC mobilization by G-CSF in combination with GRO
and GRO
T. Our results indicate that mobilization by GRO
, GRO
T, and G-CSF is dependent on proteases derived from mature neutrophils and that the synergistic PBSC mobilization response observed when GRO
or GRO
T are used with G-CSF is mediated by a synergistic increase in polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN)derived plasma MMP-9.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SPF BALB/c, B6D2F1, and C57Bl/6 mice were purchased from Harlan Sprague-Dawley (Indianapolis, IN) and housed in microisolators for 3 weeks or more before use. Homozygous MMP-9deficient C57Bl/6 mice38 were obtained from Dr Zena Werb (University of California at San Francisco) and bred in our facility. Maintenance of the MMP-9null phenotype was monitored by zymography. The Indiana University School of Medicine Animal Care and Use Committee (ICUC) approved all protocols.
Reagents
Lyophilized, carrier-free, endotoxin-free GRO
derived from Escherichia coli was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Recombinant GRO
T was produced as previously described.39 G-CSF (filgrastim) was purchased from Amgen (Thousand Oaks, CA). Purified carrier and preservative-free, endotoxin-free, rat-antimouse PMN monoclonal antibody (mAb; antiGR-1, clone RB6-8C5) and rat IgG2b and mouse IgG1
isotype control mAbs were from eBiosciences (San Diego, CA). NE and CG were obtained from Elastin Products (Owensville, MO). Mouse antiMMP-9 mAb (clone 6-6B),40 which blocks MMP-9 activation, was from Oncogene Research Products (Cambridge, MA). Murine GM-CSF was purchased from Biovision (Mountain View, CA). Recombinant murine IL-1
(rmIL-1
) and SDF-1
were from R&D Systems. Recombinant murine SCF (rmSCF) was a gift from Dr Karl Nocka (UCB, Cambridge, MA).
Peripheral blood mobilization and preparation of cell suspensions
PBSC mobilization was quantitated 15 minutes after a single subcutaneous injection of 2.5 mg/kg GRO
or GRO
T, after 4 days of administration of G-CSF (50 µg/kg/d, twice a day, subcutaneously), or 15 minutes after administration of chemokine to mice mobilized with G-CSF, about 16 hours after the last dose of G-CSF. Injections were scheduled so that control and mobilized mice were evaluated at the same time in every experiment. Mice were killed by CO2 asphyxiation and blood was obtained by cardiac puncture using syringes coated with EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid). Plasma was isolated from aliquots of blood for each animal and stored at 20°C. PBMCs were obtained by separation on Lympholyte-M (Cedarlane Labs, Hornby, ON, Canada) as previously described.9 Marrow cells were harvested by flushing femurs with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Spleen cells were prepared by pressing between microscope slides as previously described.41 Complete blood counts (CBCs) were performed on a Hemavet Mascot (CDC Technologies, Oxford, CT). Manual differentials were performed on Wright-Giemsastained (Hema-Tek 1000, Bayer, Elkhart, IN) blood smears or spleen and bone marrow cell cytospin preparations (Shandon, Pittsburgh, PA).
Preparation of marrow extracellular extracts
Immediately following CO2 asphyxiation and cardiac puncture, femurs were removed and the contents of one femur from each mouse flushed with 1.0 mL ice-cold PBS. The marrow plug was dispersed, centrifuged at 1700g for 4 minutes, and supernates frozen at 20°C.
In vivo depletion of PMNs
To evaluate neutrophil contribution to PBSC mobilization, mice were treated with antiGR-1 before mobilization. Mice mobilized by GRO
or GRO
T received 150 µg/mouse of antiGR-1 either 1 or 4 days before administration of chemokine. For G-CSF or G-CSF plus GRO
/GRO
T mobilization studies, mice received antiGR-1 prior to the first dose of G-CSF and again midway through the G-CSF regimen. In every experiment, control animals received equivalent amounts of rat antimouse IgG2b isotype mAb (eBiosciences). As described,42 we observed a selective depletion of circulating PMNs between 24 and 96 hours after a single administration of antiGR-1, with rebound neutrophilia observed at 120 hours after administration.
Gelatin zymography
Gelatinolytic activity was measured by zymography. Plasma and marrow supernates were diluted in Novex Tris (tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane)glycine sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), loaded on 10% Tris-glycine acrylamide gels containing 0.1% gelatin and electrophoresed for 4 hours at 4°C. Gels were renatured in Novex zymogram renaturing buffer (Invitrogen) containing 2.5% Triton X-100, developed in Novex zymogram developing buffer (Invitrogen) with shaking for 30 minutes, resuspended in fresh developing buffer, and incubated overnight at 37°C. Gelatinolytic activity appeared as colorless bands against a blue background after staining with colloidal blue (Invitrogen). MMP-9 and MMP-2 bands were confirmed by comparison with molecular weight (MW) standards and recombinant enzymes (R&D Systems). Band intensities on digitized gels were quantified in Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA).
NE and CG protease activities
Proteolytically active NE and CG were quantified using the respective specific NE and CG chromogenic substrates MeOSuc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Val-pNa and Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNa43 (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). Purified NE was diluted in 0.1 mL/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5 M NaCl, and 0.01% NaN3 creating standards spanning 0.25 to 2.0 µg/mL. CG was diluted in 0.1 mL/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, with 0.01% NaN3 to create a reference range from 2 to 50 µg/mL. Standards and plasma or bone marrow extract diluted in substrate buffer were added to duplicate wells containing substrate, incubated at 37°C for 3 hours and ØD405 nm determined. Sample concentrations were calculated from the linear regression equation of the standard curve.
Mouse SCF and SDF-1
measurement
Mouse SCF was quantitated using the R&D Systems mSCF Quantikine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Mouse SDF-1
was measured by ELISA. Plates were coated with 100 µL SDF-1 mAb79018 (R&D Systems) at 2 µg/mL in PBS and incubated overnight at room temperature. After incubation, wells were washed with 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS, pH 7.4, and blocked with 300 µL PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 5% sucrose, and 0.05% NaN3 for 60 minutes. The wells were washed, duplicate 100-µL aliquots of standard or sample added, sealed, and incubated for 2 hours. After incubation, the wells were washed; 100 µL biotinylated goat antihuman SDF-1 (R&D Systems) at 200 ng/mL was added and incubated for 2 hours. The wells were washed and 100 µL streptavidinhorseradish peroxidase (HRP; R&D Systems) added for 20 minutes, washed again, and 100 µL tetramethylbenzidine substrate solution (R&D Systems) added and incubated for 30 minutes. The reaction was stopped with 50 µL1 M H2SO4 and ØD determined at 450 nm with correction set to 570. rmSDF-1
was used to generate a standard curve and sample concentrations were calculated from the linear regression equation.
CFU-GM assay
PBMCs and unseparated marrow or spleen cells were assayed for CFU-GM in McCoy 5A media with 15% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Hyclone Sterile Systems, Logan, UT) and 0.3% agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI).9 PBMCs were cultured at 2 x 105/mL, bone marrow cells at 5 x 104/mL, and spleen cells at 5 x 105/mL. CFU-GM were stimulated with 10 ng/mL recombinant murine GM-CSF (rmGM-CSF), 10 ng/mL rmIL-1
, and 50 ng/mL rmSCF. Triplicate cultures from individual animals were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2, 5% O2 in air for 7 days. Total CFU-GM/mL blood was determined by multiplying CFU frequencies by PBMC/mL blood corrected for white blood cell (WBC) recovery after Lympholyte-M separation. Total CFU/spleen and femur were determined by multiplying CFU frequencies by total spleen and femur nucleated cells.
PBSC transplantation in mice
BALB/c mice received 875 cGy total body irradiation (lethal dose [LD]100) from a Gammacel-40 irradiator (Nordon International, Kanata, ON, Canada) in 2 sessions 6 hours apart. Irradiated mice received mobilized PBMCs via the tail vein in 0.2 mL saline.
In vivo MMP-9 and NE neutralization
To block MMP-9 activation, mice received either 3 mg/kg antiMMP-9 antibody or isotype mAb, intravenously, either 2 and 4 days or 2 hours before GRO
or GRO
T. For G-CSF mobilization, animals received 3 mg/kg antiMMP-9, intravenously, 2 hours before the first injection of G-CSF and again midway through the regimen. To block NE, mice received 1 mg of the selective NE inhibitor MeOSuc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Val-CMK (NE-I) in 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Calbiochem, LaJolla, CA), intraperitoneally, every day they received G-CSF. DMSO at 10% (vol/vol) had no effect on PBSC mobilization. NE-I significantly inhibits elastase-induced paw edema in mice at 10 mg/kg with a median effective dose (ED50) for inhibiting elastase-induced lung hemorrhage and pulmonary emphysema of about 8 mg/kg.44 In preliminary studies, we observed 57% to 78% inhibition of NE in plasma and marrow between 1 and 8 hours after administration of G-CSF, and 78% to 85% inhibition of marrow NE on day 5, after 4 days of dosing with NE-I and our standard 4-day G-CSFmobilizing regimen. This dose of NE-I has also been shown to block CFU-GM mobilization and SDF-1 degradation in marrow in G-CSFmobilized mice.37
Statistical analysis
Differences were evaluated using the 2-tailed t test function in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Seattle, WA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and G-CSF mobilization
We and others have implicated MMP-9 in PBSC mobilization by GRO
and GRO
T 9,31 and IL-832 used as single agents. Recently, MMP-9mediated release of SCF was implicated in mobilization by G-CSF.34 Accumulation of NE and CG within marrow35,36 and degradation of SDF-1
by NE, altering SDF-1
gradients,37 have been shown to be associated with G-CSF mobilization. Because we routinely observe elevated plasma MMP-9 levels in mice mobilized by the GRO
chemokines and MMP-9, NE, and CG can degrade SDF-1
,37,45,46 it is possible that either or both of these mechanisms could be relevant to mobilization by GRO
or GRO
T, alone or in combination with G-CSF. We quantitated MMP-9, NE, and CG enzyme activities and SDF-1
and SCF protein in plasma and marrow extravascular fluid, to evaluate molecular mechanisms associated with mobilization by GRO
T, G-CSF, and, in particular, the combination of G-CSF plus GRO
(Figure 1). As we described previously, GRO
and GRO
T mobilize PBSCs within 15 minutes, which is equivalent to a multiday regimen of G-CSF, and synergize when used with G-CSF.9,31 GRO
T elevated CFU-GM/mL blood by more than 30-fold compared to PBS-treated controls (Figure 1A) and was associated with a 6-fold elevation of both plasma and marrow MMP-9 levels (Figure 1B). Plasma (not shown) and marrow NE and CG levels were unchanged (Figure 1C), as were SDF-1
(Figure 1D) and SCF protein levels (Figure 1E). G-CSF elevated blood CFU-GM levels by more than 40-fold after 4 days and was associated with a 4- to 7-fold elevation of plasma and marrow MMP-9 levels, respectively (Figure 1B), with corresponding 8-fold and 2-fold increases in marrow NE and CG (Figure 1C). Plasma levels of NE and CG remained unchanged (not shown). G-CSF administration was associated with a 60% ± 0.03% reduction in plasma and 84% ± 0.1% reduction in marrow SDF-1
concentration (Figure 1D). No significant changes in plasma SCF concentration were observed (Figure 1E). In mice receiving G-CSF plus GRO
T, a highly synergistic, more than 200-fold, mobilization of CFU-GM was observed (Figure 1A) coincident with a synergistic 22-fold increase in plasma MMP-9 levels, which was 4- to 5-fold higher than observed with either GRO
T or G-CSF used alone (Figure 1B). Marrow MMP-9 and NE levels were elevated compared to PBS controls (4.8- and 3.8-fold, respectively), but were significantly lower than observed when either compound was used alone (Figure 1B-C). G-CSFmediated enhancement of marrow CG was not observed in mice undergoing combination mobilization (Figure 1C). SDF-1
protein levels in plasma and marrow were equivalent to those observed with mobilization by G-CSF alone and did not correlate with synergistic mobilization. SCF levels were unchanged in plasma and marrow (Figure 1E).
|
Synergistic mobilization of long-term repopulating cells (LTRCs) was also observed. Eighty percent (8 of 10 mice) of lethally irradiated BALB/c mice survived more than 180 days after receiving grafts of 2 x 106 PBMCs mobilized by either GRO
T or G-CSF alone, whereas no mice (0 of 10) survived after receiving grafts of 2 x 105 PBMCs from either group. In contrast, 10 of 10 mice and 7 of 10 mice survived more than 180 days after receiving 2 x 106 or 2 x 105 PBMCs, respectively, from mice mobilized with GRO
T plus G-CSF.
MMP-9 plays a role in GRO
and G-CSF mobilization and is essential for synergistic mobilization by GRO
plus G-CSF
Elevation of MMP-9 activity in both GRO
and G-CSF mobilized mice but elevation of NE and CG only in G-CSF mobilized mice suggest that MMP-9 may represent a common mediator, whereas NE and CG are involved only in G-CSFinduced mobilization. To determine the importance of MMP-9 and NE in combination mobilization, mice were treated with antiMMP-9 or the NE inhibitor MeOSuc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Val-CMK prior to or during (or both) mobilization. AntiMMP-9 blocked GRO
- or GRO
T-induced CFU-GM mobilization by 84% ± 2% and 92% ± 3%, respectively (Figure 2). Administration of antiMMP-9 as a single dose 2 hours before administration of GRO
or GRO
T resulted in more than 97% inhibition of CFU-GM mobilization (not shown).9,31 MeOSuc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Val-CMK given for 1 or 4 days had no effect on GRO
-induced CFU-GM mobilization (not shown). In mice receiving antiMMP-9 or MeOSuc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Val-CMK plus G-CSF, CFU-GM mobilization was reduced by 42% ± 4% and 62% ± 3%, respectively, indicating that both MMP-9 and NE contribute to G-CSFinduced mobilization but neither alone is fully effective. Mobilization by G-CSF plus GRO
or GRO
T was highly synergistic and completely abrogated in mice treated with antiMMP-9, with levels of CFU-GM/mL blood equivalent to antiMMP-9treated mice mobilized with G-CSF alone. MeOSuc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Val-CMK had no effect on synergistic mobilization by G-CSF plus GRO
T. This suggests that MMP-9 is the sole protease involved in the synergistic mobilization response.
|
PBSC mobilization by GRO
and G-CSF depends on peripheral PMNs
Because mobilization by G-CSF plus GRO
is associated with synergistic elevation in plasma but not marrow MMP-9 (Figure 1B) and MMP-9, NE, and CG involved in G-CSF mobilization are stored in PMN granules,47,48 we investigated the requirement for peripheral versus marrow neutrophils for mobilization by GRO
or GRO
T and G-CSF, alone and in combination. AntiGR-1 administration results in a selective time-dependent depletion of PMNs.42,49 At 96 hours, a more than 95% depletion of circulating PMNs and a more than 97% reduction in marrow PMNs were observed (Table 1; PBS). Immature marrow neutrophilic cells (INCs) were reduced by 63%, but substantial INCs remained (Table 1). Because the kinetics of GRO
and G-CSF mobilization differ, we used 2 protocols to evaluate mobilization in antiGR-1 or isotype-treated mice. Animals were mobilized with a single dose of chemokine 24 or 96 hours after administration of antiGR-1 or IgG2b mAbs. For G-CSF mobilization, mice received antiGR-1 or IgG2b mAbs 2 hours before initiation of G-CSF dosing and again halfway through the mobilizing regimen. Mice mobilized with G-CSF plus GRO
were treated as described for G-CSF. In control mAb-treated mice, GRO
, GRO
T, and G-CSF used as single agents mobilized CFU-GMs by 19- to 27-fold (Table 1). The combination of GRO
or GRO
T with G-CSF demonstrated synergy, elevating CFU-GM levels by 135- to 147-fold. In contrast, no mobilization by GRO
, GRO
T, G-CSF, or their combination was observed in mice treated with antiGR-1. Peripheral blood and marrow PMNs were reduced by more than 98% in antiGR-1treated mice compared to isotype mAb-treated animals; however, INCs still comprised about 12% of total marrow nucleated cells (Tables 1-2).
|
|
Levels of plasma and marrow MMP-9, NE, and CG were barely detectable in antiGR-1treated mice, in the absence of mature neutrophils, and no elevations in plasma or marrow were observed following GRO
/GRO
T or G-CSF administration, alone or in combination (not shown). At the time that G-CSFinduced and GRO
-or GRO
T plus G-CSFinduced CFU-GM mobilization was quantitated, circulating PMNs were less than 0.04 x 106/mL blood (< 1.2% PMNs) but with 0.27 to 0.44 x 106 segmented neutrophils/femur (15%-24% PMNs). These results suggest that MMP-9, NE, and CG accumulating following G-CSF or GRO
/GRO
T plus G-CSF administration are PMN derived and that a threshold effect is involved, because mature PMN/femur were still within about 20% of normal. It was also noted that the increase in peripheral PMNs (2.3 ± 0.2-fold) observed after G-CSF treatment in control mice was significantly increased by administration of GRO
(4.0 ± 0.2-fold; P < .001) or GRO
T (4.1 ± 0.3-fold; P < .001). The increase in marrow PMNs (2.0 ± 0.2-fold) observed after G-CSF treatment was absent in mice mobilized by G-CSF plus GRO
or GRO
T; in fact, marrow PMN levels in these mice were about 25% lower than in controls. These data in conjunction with the observation of lower marrow protease levels in mice receiving combination mobilization (Figures 1B-C) support a role for peripheral neutrophil-derived proteases, particularly MMP-9, in synergistic mobilization.
The lack of CFU-GM mobilization by GRO
or GRO
T and G-CSF in antiGR-1treated mice was not due to antiGR-1 toxicity, because antiGR-1 treatment was without significant effect on CFU-GM/femur (Table 2), consistent with the fact that more than 90% of CFU-GM reside in the GR-1neg population.49 Nucleated marrow cells were reduced by about 25%, resulting from selective depletion of neutrophils. AntiGR-1 did not affect spleen cellularity. G-CSF or G-CSF plus GRO
/GRO
T mobilized substantial CFU-GM to the spleen that was also blocked by antiGR-1 (Table 2). Unlike G-CSF, GRO
and GRO
T do not mobilize CFU-GM to the spleen. Mobilization of CFU-GM by GRO
or GRO
T and G-CSF, alone and in combination, and the absence of mobilization after treatment with antiGR-1 in splenectomized mice were equivalent to those observed in normal mice (not shown).
Transplantation of 2 x 106 G-CSF, GRO
,orGRO
T-mobilized PBMCs from isotype mAb-treated mice into lethally irradiated mice resulted in 8 of 10, 7 of 10, and 8 of 10 mice/group, respectively, surviving more than 180 days, with 0 of 10 mice surviving if receiving transplants with 2 x 105 mobilized PBMCs from each group. Transplantation of 2 x 106 and 2 x 105 PBMCs from mice mobilized by G-CSF plus GRO
or GRO
T resulted in 10 of 10 and 8 of 10 mice/group surviving more than 180 days, respectively. Transplantation of 2 x 106 PBMCs from GRO
-, G-CSF, or G-CSF plus GRO
-mobilized antiGR-1treated mice or nonmobilized PBMCs did not protect recipients (0 of 10 mice/group surviving > 16 days) indicating that like CFU-GM, LTRC mobilization by GRO
, GRO
T, and G-CSF and the synergistic mobilization by either chemokine with G-CSF are absent in neutropenic mice.
Attenuated mobilization by GRO
T and absence of synergistic mobilization by GRO
T plus G-CSF in MMP-9/ mice
We investigated the requirement of MMP-9 for synergistic mobilization by G-CSF plus GRO
T in MMP-9/ mice (Figure 3). Mobilization of CFU-GM by GRO
T was significantly lower but not absent in MMP-9/ mice (Figure 3A) despite the absence of detectable plasma or marrow MMP-9 (Figure 3B). A 2.4 ± 0.6-fold (P < .05) greater mobilization by GRO
T was observed in male mice. Mobilization by GRO
T in female and male knockout mice was 27% and 42% of that observed in normal female and male mice, respectively. G-CSFinduced mobilization was equivalent in male and female control and MMP-9/ mice. Equivalent mobilization by G-CSF in control and antiMMP-9treated male and female MMP-9/ mice supports the specificity of the antiMMP-9 antibody (Figure 3C). Absolute PMN counts between control and knockout mice did not differ significantly; however, the percentage of PMNs in male knockout mice was significantly higher than in female knockout mice or control mice of either sex (Figure 3D). Synergistic mobilization of CFU-GMs by G-CSF plus GRO
T was observed in control mice as expected (Figure 3A), coincident with a synergistic increase in plasma MMP-9 levels (Figure 3B), but was completely absent in MMP-9/ mice, with CFU-GM/mL blood equivalent to that observed with G-CSF alone. No difference in marrow NE and CG accumulation was observed between male and female control mice (not shown). G-CSFinduced mobilization was associated with equivalent elevation of both enzymes in control and knockout mice in agreement with equivalent CFU-GM mobilization, although a trend toward lower CG levels was observed in male and female MMP-9/ mice (Figure 3C). As described, NE and CG levels were lower in mice mobilized by G-CSF plus GRO
T compared to mice mobilized by G-CSF, and no significant differences were noted between control and knockout mice.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and GRO
T represents a means to enhance PBSC mobilization by G-CSF, particularly in some patients and healthy donors who respond poorly. We demonstrate unequivocally and for the first time that mobilization by GRO
or GRO
T and G-CSF, used alone or in combination, depends on PMN-derived proteases. In addition, synergistic PBSC mobilization observed when these chemokines and G-CSF are used in combination is dependent on PMN-derived plasma MMP-9.
We previously reported that a rapid and transient up-regulation of plasma MMP-9 precedes PBSC mobilization by GRO
T.9,31 We now extend these observations by demonstrating that both GRO
and GRO
T also elevate marrow MMP-9 levels. Furthermore, the accumulation of both plasma and marrow MMP-9 associated with GRO
-induced PBSC mobilization is absent in mice depleted of mature PMNs despite the presence of appreciable numbers of immature marrow neutrophilic cells, and absent when MMP-9 activation is blocked in vivo, strongly suggesting that the peripheral neutrophil is the source of MMP-9. We have also observed that the return of PBSC mobilization by GRO
following PMN depletion coincides exactly with the endogenous return of peripheral blood PMNs and plasma MMP-9 activity, but not marrow PMNs or the accumulation of marrow MMP-9 (L.M.P., unpublished observations, January 2003). These results are consistent with a neutrophil requirement for IL-8induced CFU-GM mobilization.50
A positive correlation between neutrophils and NE and CG accumulating in marrow during G-CSF administration and CFU-GM mobilization resulting from proteolytic cleavage of VCAM-135,36 has been described. However, although highly correlative and consistent with the protease repertoire of neutrophils, a requirement for either PMNs or their proteases for mobilization in G-CSFtreated mice was not demonstrated. In addition, administration of NE-I was shown to block G-CSFinduced mobilization37; however, because macrophages,51,52 lymphocytes,53 and fibroblasts,54 as well as PMNs, release elastases, one cannot conclude selective involvement of PMNs. We now show that selective PMN depletion blocks G-CSFinduced stem and progenitor cell mobilization and accumulation of marrow NE and CG and plasma and marrow MMP-9 but not MMP-2, clearly demonstrating that the marrow proteases implicated in G-CSF mobilization are in fact derived from PMNs. Furthermore, because plasma NE and CG activity does not change appreciably during G-CSFinduced mobilization, a preferential role for marrow PMN-derived proteases is suggested, which contrasts with GRO
. In vivo neutralization with antiMMP-9 or NE inhibitor also demonstrates that G-CSFmediated mobilization requires PMN-derived proteases. The fact that NE and CG accumulation was blocked in antiGR-1treated mice, despite the appreciable presence of immature marrow neutrophilic cells, suggests that these residual neutrophilic cells are insufficient to mediate/contribute to mobilization or may not contain sufficient proteases. However, primary granules that contain NE and CG and specific granules containing gelatinases are present by the promyelocyte stage of neutrophil maturation48 and these and more mature neutrophilic cells are present in marrow after antiGR-1 treatment.
A critical role for PMNs in PBSC mobilization is supported by studies in gene-deficient mice. IL-8, which binds the same receptor as GRO
/GRO
T in mice, and G-CSF do not mobilize in G-CSF receptor (G-CSFR)deficient mice.55,56 Similarly, we have shown that GRO
T and G-CSF do not mobilize in CXCR2-deficient mice.31 These studies suggest possible cross-talk between these receptors expressed on PMNs. Alternatively, lack of mobilization by IL-8 in G-CSFRdeficient mice may result from the fact that these mice have few circulating PMNs and protease release in response to IL-8 may not reach threshold levels. In CXCR2-deficeint mice, peripheral PMN levels are normal or elevated57 and granulopoiesis is enhanced58; however, impaired PMN migration and chemoattraction59,60 and increased susceptibility to infection60 suggest defects in responses downstream of G-CSFR.
Important novel mechanistic information was identified by analyzing PBSC mobilization by G-CSF plus GRO
or GRO
T.A summary of the changes in protease and cytokine levels in plasma and marrow are shown in Table 3. The synergistic mobilization response was mediated solely by a synergistic rise in plasma MMP-9. This was demonstrated by loss of the synergistic response on MMP-9 neutralization but not NE inhibition in vivo and the lack of synergistic mobilization in MMP-9 knockout mice. The importance of plasma MMP-9 was also reflected in the reduction of marrow MMP-9, NE, and CG compared to mice mobilized with G-CSF alone. This can potentially be explained by the shift in neutrophil populations to the periphery. Peripheral blood levels PMNs increased 4-fold (2-fold above G-CSF alone), whereas marrow PMN levels were reduced by 2-fold compared to G-CSF alone and were about 25% lower than controls.
|
The ability of plasma MMP-9 to mediate HSC release from marrow is not completely understood. MMP-9,61-64 NE, and CG35,36 can degrade extracellular matrix and adhesion molecule/receptor interactions within marrow. In addition, PMN adhesion and release of proteases causes disorganization of endothelial junctions,64-66 facilitating HSC transmigration and egress. In this regard, we observe degradation of recombinant VCAM-1 by activated MMP-9 or marrow supernates from GRO
T-mobilized mice and 11% and 31% reduction in CXCR4 expression levels on mobilized c-kit+, lin cells from GRO
T-treated and G-CSF plus GRO
T-treated mice, respectively, compared to G-CSF alone (L.M.P. and S.F., unpublished observations, January 2003). Furthermore, administration of recombinant MMP-9 to rabbits induces a rapid peripheral leukocytosis,67 although HSCs were not quantitated. It is likely that in GRO
/GRO
T-mobilized mice, elevation of marrow MMP-9 that degrades matrix and releases HSCs, plus disruption of endothelial junctions by plasma MMP-9, coordinately result in HSC transmigration. In mice mobilized by G-CSF plus GRO
/GRO
T, release of HSCs within marrow as a consequence of the proteolytic environment created by G-CSF plus the peripheral effect of augmented PMNs and synergistic elevation of plasma MMP-9 levels results in greatly facilitated HSC egress. Although we do not observe an increase in marrow MMP-9 on combination mobilization, we cannot exclude efflux of plasma MMP-9 into marrow that participates in matrix degradation, which is inactivated or complexes with substrate and cannot be detected.
The GRO
chemokines and G-CSF were without effects on plasma MMP-2 levels and we did not detect MMP-2 in marrow after mobilization, suggesting that MMP-2 does not play a role in mobilization by these cytokines. Detection of elevated levels of plasma MMP-9 but not MMP-2 after 4 to 5 days in patients mobilized with G-CSF68 supports our results. Although surprising, because both are stored in neutrophil granules and share substrate specificity, MMP-2 and MMP-9 are structurally divergent in the hemopexin domain and are differentially regulated by the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP) family of specific inhibitors.69 Because it is the stoichiometry between MMP and TIMP that determines MMP activation, differential activation is possible. G-CSF stimulation of the release of MMP-2 alone or with MMP-9 from nonhematopoietic G-CSFR+ cancer cells has been reported70,71 and also supports differential regulation of MMP-2 versus MMP-9 production from the same receptor.
We did not observe absence of GRO
/GRO
T-induced mobilization in MMP-9/ mice despite the absence of proMMP-9 protein and MMP-9 activity. No compensatory rise in MMP-2 or other gelatinolytic activity or NE or CG was seen, and neutrophil transmigration is normal in MMP-9/ mice.72 Mobilization was, however, significantly attenuated. This contrasts with the report of equivalent mobilization results by IL-8 in normal and MMP-9/ mice.50 However, in this report, attenuation of mobilization in response to IL-8 is actually observed in MMP-9/ mice if total CFU-GM mobilized above control is quantitated rather than fold change, to normalize for different backgrounds in normal versus knockout mice, which is consistent with our results. It is well known that compensatory mechanisms can counteract lifelong gene disruption73 and compensation to development of autoimmune encephalomyelitis in MMP-9/ mice has been reported.74 The MMPs are a large family of endopeptidases,38, 61,75 with each MMP having preferred as well as overlapping substrate specificity.61,76 The ability of other MMPs to participate in GRO
/GRO
T mobilization in the absence of MMP-9 is unknown. The fact that antiMMP-9 blocked virtually all GRO
/GRO
T-induced mobilization in normal mice, but MMP-9 gene deletion only partially attenuated the response, argues that the acute MMP-9 block induced by antibody occurs too rapidly to permit compensation. In contrast to mobilization by GRO
/GRO
T alone, synergistic mobilization was completely absent in MMP-9/ mice, indicating that the potential compensatory mechanisms that allow some mobilization in response to chemokines cannot substitute for plasma MMP-9, supporting the specificity of the plasma MMP-9mediated synergistic response.
MMP-9mediated elevation of plasma SCF levels that facilitates HSC mobilization by G-CSF has been described,34 which could explain the lack of GRO
/GRO
T mobilization by antiMMP-9.9,31 However, we were unable to detect elevated plasma or marrow SCF after mobilization by GRO
/GRO
T, G-CSF, or their combination and did not observe reduced G-CSFinduced CFU-GM mobilization in MMP-9/ mice.34 The reasons for these differences are not clear; however, our MMP-9/ mice are on the C57Bl/6 background, whereas theirs are on the CD1 background.34 Genetic differences in mobilization response to G-CSF77 and GRO
(L.M.P., unpublished observations, January 1997) are known and may be involved. Consistent with our results, 2 recent reports also demonstrate equivalent G-CSFinduced mobilization in normal and MMP-9/ mice.78,79 In addition, MMP-9 was linked to synergistic mobilization by G-CSF plus pertussis toxin,78 which supports our earlier studies implicating G
i proteins in MMP-9 production in response to GRO
.31
SDF1-CXCR4 interactions are believed to be involved in HSC homing and mobilization.12,80-82 A correlation between reduction in marrow SDF-1
by NE and PBSC mobilization by G-CSF was reported, suggesting that altered blood/marrow SDF-1 gradients might be responsible.37 This attractive potential mechanism is supported by the fact that SDF-1
can be processed and inactivated by NE,37 CG,46 and MMP-9.45 However, we observed no effect of GRO
or GRO
T on plasma or marrow SDF-1, making it unlikely that it plays a role in GRO
mobilization. We did observe preferential reduction in marrow SDF-1 in G-CSFmobilized mice consistent with this report.37 However, comparison of absolute protein in plasma versus marrow extract does not allow comparison of gradient at the marrow/plasma interface. When expressed as molarity, assuming a 10-µL femoral extravascular compartment volume,35 we observed 0.51 ± 0.03 nM in plasma versus16 ± 0.4 nM/femur, that is, a 31:1 gradient favoring marrow (n = 15 mice). However, in G-CSFtreated mice, despite a 90% reduction of marrow SDF-1, a plasma-marrow gradient of 0.2 ± 0.01 nM versus 3.0 ± 0.01 nM was observed, still favoring marrow by 15:1. It is unlikely that a 2-fold change in SDF-1
gradient alone is sufficient to mediate HSC egress. In checkerboard assays in vitro, 10- to 100-fold differences in SDF-1 gradient were required for migration of MO7e cells83 and more than 10-fold differences were required for maximal migration of primary CFU-GM.84
In summary, we demonstrate that PBSC mobilization by the GRO
chemokines and G-CSF requires PMN-derived proteases. Differential but overlapping protease utilization and preferential sites of release of these proteases are involved, consistent with the different yet synergistic activities of these 2 mobilizers. Lastly and most importantly, we demonstrate that the synergistic PBSC mobilization in response to G-CSF plus GRO
is mediated by a synergistic increase in peripheral PMN-derived plasma MMP-9, strongly suggesting that the peripheral proteolytic environment is responsible for the synergistic mobilization response. Our data also suggest that MMP-9 release or activation may be a common mechanism downstream of both the CXCR2 and G-CSF receptors that can be manipulated for therapeutic utility.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, September 4, 2003; DOI 10.1182/blood-2003-04-1115.
A.G.K. is employed by GlaxoSmithKline, whose potential product was studied in the present work.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Supported by grant HL69669 from the National Institutes of Health.
Reprints: Louis M. Pelus, Walther Oncology Center, 950 W Walnut St, Indianapolis, IN 46202; e-mail: lpelus{at}iupui.edu.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. Blood. 2001;97: 1534-1542.
. Blood. 1995;85: 3412-3415.
chemokines with potent hematopoietic and anti-infective activities. J Immunol. 2000;164: 3774-3782.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Christopher, F. Liu, M. J. Hilton, F. Long, and D. C. Link Suppression of CXCL12 production by bone marrow osteoblasts is a common and critical pathway for cytokine-induced mobilization Blood, August 13, 2009; 114(7): 1331 - 1339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Kim, H.-N. Pak, J. H. Park, J. I. Choi, M.-H. Nam, Y. Jo, and Y.-H. Kim Non-ischaemic titrated cardiac injury caused by radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation mobilizes CD34-positive mononuclear cells by non-stromal cell-derived factor-1{alpha} mechanism Europace, August 1, 2009; 11(8): 1024 - 1031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Smart and P. R. Riley The Stem Cell Movement Circ. Res., May 23, 2008; 102(10): 1155 - 1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Papayannopoulou and D. T. Scadden Stem-cell ecology and stem cells in motion Blood, April 15, 2008; 111(8): 3923 - 3930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. van Pel, H. Hagoort, M. J. Kwakkenbos, J. Hamann, and W. E. Fibbe Differential role of CD97 in interleukin-8-induced and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor-induced hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell mobilization Haematologica, April 1, 2008; 93(4): 601 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fukuda, H. Bian, A. G. King, and L. M. Pelus The chemokine GRO{beta} mobilizes early hematopoietic stem cells characterized by enhanced homing and engraftment Blood, August 1, 2007; 110(3): 860 - 869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Selleri, N. Montuori, P. Ricci, V. Visconte, A. Baiano, M. V. Carriero, B. Rotoli, G. Rossi, and P. Ragno In vivo Activity of the Cleaved Form of Soluble Urokinase Receptor: A New Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cell Mobilizer. Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 66(22): 10885 - 10890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tefferi Pathogenesis of Myelofibrosis With Myeloid Metaplasia J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2005; 23(33): 8520 - 8530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fukuda, H. E. Broxmeyer, and L. M. Pelus Flt3 ligand and the Flt3 receptor regulate hematopoietic cell migration by modulating the SDF-1{alpha}(CXCL12)/CXCR4 axis Blood, April 15, 2005; 105(8): 3117 - 3126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Selleri, N. Montuori, P. Ricci, V. Visconte, M. V. Carriero, N. Sidenius, B. Serio, F. Blasi, B. Rotoli, G. Rossi, et al. Involvement of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization Blood, March 1, 2005; 105(5): 2198 - 2205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Papayannopoulou Current mechanistic scenarios in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell mobilization Blood, March 1, 2004; 103(5): 1580 - 1585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. O'Brien, A. Tefferi, and P. Valent Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia and Myeloproliferative Disease Hematology, January 1, 2004; 2004(1): 146 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2004 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||