Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 January 2004, Vol. 103, No. 2, pp. 369.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vose, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vose, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow


InsideBlood

Reduced intensity allogeneic transplantation: updated results using alternative regimens

The use of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens for hematologic malignancies and solid tumors has been designed to reduce treatment-related mortality (TRM) and provide a platform of durable donor engraftment in order to exploit a graft-versus-tumor effect. First-generation regimens were designed to be primarily immunosuppressive in an effort to facilitate donor engraftment. However, the lack of significant antitumor effects of some regimens has been a problem, allowing disease progression prior to the development of any graft-versus-tumor effects. Furthermore, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a significant clinical problem.

In this issue of Blood, 2 reports of alternative RIC regimens are included. Faulkner and colleagues (page 428) evaluated 65 patients with lymphoproliferative disorders treated with an RIC regimen consisting of alemtuzumab (Campath) and BEAM (BCNU [1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea], etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) followed by transplantation involving an HLA-matched sibling (n = 57) or a matched unrelated donor (n = 6). At a median follow-up of 1.4 years, 37 of 65 patients remain alive in complete remission. Acute GVHD (grades I-II) occurred in 11 (17%) of 64 patients. The estimated one-year TRM was 8% for patients receiving their first transplant but 57% for those patients who had received a prior autologous transplant. Histologic diagnosis of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma and age at transplantation of older than 46 years were significantly associated with a higher relapse rate and worse event-free survival.

In a second report, Blaise and colleagues (page 435) evaluated a regimen consisting of fludarabine, antithymocyte globulin (ATG), and busulfan for the treatment of refractory solid tumors consisting of renal cell carcinoma, breast carcinoma, malignant melanoma, and ovarian carcinoma. The TRM with this regimen was low at 9%, and the overall response rate was 14%. Patients without disease progression at the time of transplantation had an improved response. Responses were seen in all tumor types with the overall cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at 65% and chronic GVHD at 44%.

Both of these studies demonstrate a proof of principle for the RIC regimens. Continuous alterations in an attempt to increase the antitumor effects while decreasing GVHD are evolving. The data so far have demonstrated promising results in the indolent lymphoproliferative disorders and Hodgkin disease in some patients; however, most studies in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas and solid tumors have not demonstrated as much disease responsiveness. Alterations with a moderate increase in the antitumor effects and the addition of immune suppressive agents and/or monoclonal antibodies may improve the disease control while decreasing the GVHD associated with allogeneic transplantation. These 2 studies represent a step in the right direction; however, additional improvements will be needed to increase the antitumor effects, particularly in patients with aggressive lymphoma and solid tumors.

--- Julie M. Vose
University of Nebraska Medical Center


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vose, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vose, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
Sponsor: Genentech BioOncology and and Biogen Idec
Blood Online is supported in part by
Genentech BioOncology and Biogen Idec
  Copyright © 2004 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020