| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Blood, 1 July 2004, Vol. 104, No. 1, pp. 9.
Molecular monitoring of EBV-positive lymphomaERASMUS UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, ROTTERDAM
Monitoring of Epstein-Barr virus DNA by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction may serve as an accurate surrogate marker of tumor load in patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma that were demonstrated to be EBV-positive.
The hypothesis that release of EBV DNA fragments from EBV-positive lymphomas might be a general phenomenon and might be used as a surrogate marker of disease activity was the starting point for the study of Au and colleagues reported in this issue of Blood (page 243). The authors show that molecular monitoring of EBV DNA by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) closely mirrors the clinical picture of the individual patient with an EBV-positive lymphoma. In addition, patients with a high EBV DNA copy number before the start of treatment showed inferior outcome. The prognostic significance of quantified EBV DNA seemed independent from the type of lymphoma, but was especially evident in patients with NK cell lymphoma. These results compare well to earlier findings in patients with PTLD and suggest that patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma as well as patients with Hodgkin disease should be evaluated for the presence of EBV at diagnosis and during follow-up if EBV positivity has been demonstrated. Such diagnostic evaluation may include in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) on histopathologic examination and the quantification of EBV DNA in plasma by PCR. Au et al used a very sensitive real-time PCR and reported relatively high values of EBV DNA in the NK cell lymphoma and PTLD group. The copy numbers reported exceed those reported in PTLD by a number of other investigators. The different quantified levels of EBV DNA hamper the comparison and combined analysis of several studies. It strongly supports efforts aimed at standardization of recently used real-time technology, such as has been initiated by the Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD, www.qcmd.org). Furthermore, the data presented by Au et al emphasize the importance of studies aiming to elucidate the exact pathogenetic role of EBV in lymphomagenesis, as such studies may yield new targets for therapy in poor-risk EBV-positive lymphoma. So far, the interplay between the EBV gene program, type and developmental stage of infected lymphocyte, and putative additional oncogenic event has remained an open but intriguing question in most EBV-positive lymphomas. References
Related Article in Blood Online:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2004 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||