| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Blood, 1 August 2004, Vol. 104, No. 3, pp. 719-726. Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on April 13, 2004; DOI 10.1182/blood-2003-09-3016.
HEMOSTASIS, THROMBOSIS, AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY
Characterization of plasminogen as an adhesive ligand for integrins
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
M
2 and
5
1. The immobilized Glu-Pg, but not its derivatives with the N-terminal peptide lacking, plasmin and Lys-Pg, supported efficient adhesion that was abolished by anti-
M
2 and anti-
5
1 integrin-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). In addition, lysine binding sites of Glu-Pg contributed to cell adhesion inasmuch as tranexamic acid and
-aminocaproic acid inhibited cell adhesion. The involvement of
M
2 and
5
1 in adhesion to Glu-Pg was demonstrable with blood neutrophils, U937 monocytoid cells, and genetically engineered
M
2-transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells. In
M
2, the
MI-domain is the binding site for Glu-Pg because the "I-less" form of
M
2 did not support cell adhesion and the recombinant
MI-domain bound Glu-Pg directly. In comparison with cell adhesion, the binding of soluble Glu-Pg to cells and the concomitant generation of plasmin activity was inhibited by anti-
5
1 but not by anti-
M
2. These findings identify Glu-Pg as an adhesive ligand for integrins
M
2 and
5
1 and suggest that
5
1 may participate in the binding of soluble Glu-Pg and assist in its activation. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Binding of Pg to fibrin clots or cell surfaces enhances t-PAinduced Pg activation many fold (reviewed by Nieuwenhuizen5 and Plow et al6). The association of Pg with several extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, including fibronectin, collagen IV, laminin, and fibrin(ogen), also dramatically stimulates its activation,7,8 suggesting that the ECM proteins may provide alternative surfaces for assembly and regulation of Pg conversion to Pm. The interactions of Pg with the ECM proteins in vitro point to the Pg potential to be deposited within the extravascular interstitial tissues. Pg is not synthesized by other tissues except liver and, therefore, should traverse the endothelial barrier in blood vessels to become associated with the underlying ECM. This might occur during the inflammatory response when plasma proteins leak through the vessels. Deposition of plasma proteinsfor example, fibrin(ogen)is well documented within inflamed tissues.9,10 Indeed, recent immunohistochemical studies localized Pg in human atherosclerotic coronary arteries in cellular and acellular portions of the plaque.11 The binding of Glu-Pg, the native form of the molecule, and its Lys-Pg derivative, which does not contain the N-terminal 77/78 residues, to cells and the ECM proteins is mediated primarily by low-affinity lysine binding sites (LBSs) present in kringle domains 1, 2, 4, and 5 of Pg.12-15 The occupation of LBSs induces a large conformational change in Pg and facilitates its activation.16 LBSs of Pg are responsible for multiple interactions of this protein and are of high capacity and ubiquitous in their nature. A growing list of candidate receptors on the cell surface for soluble Pg and their structural and functional heterogeneity supports the LBS-mediated recognition mechanism. Several proteins with carboxy-terminal lysines (
-enolase, annexin II) have been identified as Pg receptors on the cell surface,17,18 while other Pg-binding molecules (amphoterin, integrin glycoprotein IIbIIIa [GPIIbIIIa], cytokeratin-8, dipeptidyl peptidase, tissue factor) appear to utilize internal lysines.11,19-22 The interactions of surface-bound Pg with several proteins involves, in addition to LBSs, some other binding regions,23,24 suggesting that the alteration of Pg conformation may control recognition.
Because Pg is deposited within the ECM at the sites of vascular injury and can bind multiple cell surface proteins, we have examined whether integrins can engage Pg as an adhesive ligand. Our previous studies with model cells expressing integrin
M
2 demonstrated that Pg is capable of supporting cell adhesion.25 However, the relationships between Pg/Pm and
M
2 and/or other integrins on leukocytes that abundantly express this integrin have not been defined. The data presented in this paper show that integrins
M
2 (CD11b/CD18, Mac-1, CR3) and
5
1 (CD49e/CD29, very late antigen-5 [VLA-5]) on leukocytes can bind Glu-Pg and that
5
1 is involved in Pg activation.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human Glu-Pg was purified from fresh human plasma using affinity chromatography on lysine-Sepharose followed by gel filtration as described.26 The N-terminal fragment of Pg (residues 1 to 78) was generated during spontaneous conversion of native Glu-Pg into Lys-Pg due to the traces of active Pm. For that purpose, Glu-Pg (5 to 10 mg/mL) purified without inhibitors was incubated at 4° C for 24 to 26 hours, and the progress of Glu-Pg to Lys-Pg conversion was monitored by sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) using 7.5% homogeneous gel (Pharmacia Fast Gel; Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). Its identity was confirmed by N-terminal sequence analysis, and a single EPLDDYVNTQ sequence was determined. Lys-Pg was prepared as described.26 Lys-Pm was from Enzyme Research Laboratories (South Bend, IN). Glu-Pg was labeled with 125I using IODO-GEN according to the manufacturer's protocol (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The expression, purification, and characterization of the
MI-domain as a fusion protein with glutathione S-transferase (GST) have been previously described.27 The free
MI-domain was prepared by cleavage of the fusion construct with thrombin (Enzyme Research Laboratories, South Bend, IL). Streptokinase, t-PA, N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP), tranexamic acid, and
-aminocaproic acid (
-ACA) were from Sigma (St Louis, MO). The chromogenic plasmin substrate Val-Leu-Lys-p-nitroanilide (S-2251) was from Chromogenix Diapharma Group (Franklin, OH). The peptide P2, corresponding to the
-chain residues
377 to
395 of human fibrinogen (YSMKKTTMKIIPFNRLTIG), was described previously.28 Anti-
M
2 function-blocking monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) 44a and IB4 recognize the epitopes within the
MI-domain29 and the
2 subunit,30 respectively. The mechanism by which mAb IB4 blocks adhesion is not direct and apparently involves the allosteric mechanism.31 Monoclonal antibody 1965 (clone JBA1), directed against the
1 integrin subunit, and polyclonal anti-
5
1 antibody 1950 were from Chemicon (Temecula, CA). Polyclonal anti-Pg antibody was from Accurate Chemicals (Westbury, NY), and anti-GST mAb (clone DG122-2A7) was from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). Monoclonal antibody 8A11, directed against human fibronectin,32 and mAb 4-2,33 recognizing human fibrinogen, were described previously.
Cell culture
Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells expressing
M
2 and mock-transfected cells were described previously.34 To generate cells that express the "I-less" form of
M
2, the construct in which the
M sequence Glu131-Gly321 was deleted from the
M reading frame was generated by overlap extension mutagenesis.35 Briefly, the 2 pairs of primers were designed, and
M coding regions 73 to 509 bp and 1083 to 3543 bp were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and then fused together in the subsequent PCR reaction. The modified
M sequence was cloned into pcDNA3.1. HEK 293 cells were stably transfected with a created plasmid and pcDNA3.1-
2 vector as previously described.25 Erythroleukemic K562 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Rockville, MD). The cell lines were maintained in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM)F12 (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 25 mM HEPES (N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid). U937 monocytoid cells were obtained from ATCC and cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS. Neutrophils were isolated under sterile conditions from peripheral blood obtained from consenting volunteers and anticoagulated with acid-citrate-dextrose essentially as described.36
Cell adhesion assays
The wells of polysterene microtiter plates (Immulon 4HBX, Dynex Technologies, Chantilly, VA) or Costar (Bethesda, MD) were coated with various concentrations of protein ligands for 3 hours at 37° C and postcoated with 0.5% polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) for 1 hour at 37° C. The cells were labeled with 10 µM calcein acetoxymethyl ester (calcein-AM) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), and assays were performed as described previously.37 Fluorescence was measured in a fluorescence plate reader (CytoFluorII, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), and the number of adherent cells was determined from a standard curve constructed using the fluorescence of aliquots with a known number of labeled cells.
Immunofluorescent studies
The binding of Pg to the ECM deposited by fibroblasts was analyzed by immunofluorescent staining. WI38 human lung fibroblasts were obtained from ATCC and were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM glutamine, and 2 mM sodium pyruvate. Cells were harvested from the flasks with trypsin-EDTA (trypsinethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), washed, and cultured on glass coverslips in 12-well plates in DMEM-F12 supplemented with 10% FBS and 2 mM sodium pyruvate for 72 hours. Cells in selected wells were rinsed, and fresh medium supplemented with 0.25 mg/mL fibrinogen was added. A thin film of fibrin that formed on the top of the fibroblast layer after 1 hour was removed, and 0.5 mL of 0.1 mg/mL Pg was added to the wells with and without added fibrinogen. After 1 hour of incubation at 37° C, the media were removed and cells were fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes. After blocking with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (blocking buffer), primary antibodies directed against human fibronectin, fibrinogen, and Pg diluted in the blocking buffer were added. After 2 hours of incubation, the slides were washed with triethanolamine-buffered saline (TBS) plus 0.05% Tween 20, and the secondary goat antimouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) conjugated to Alexa 594 (1:1500 dilution) or goat antirabbit IgG conjugated to Alexa 488 (1:1500 dilution) was added for 30 minutes. Images of the fluorescent-labeled ECM were obtained using a Leica TCS-NT laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica, Heidelberg, Germany) and HCX Plan Apo x 63 NA 1.4 oil (
) lenses. Leica's Confocal software was used for image acquisition, and Corel Photo-Paint 8.0 software (Jericho, NY) was used for image processing.
Solid-phase binding assays
To test the interaction of immobilized Pg or its derivatives with soluble
MI-domain, 96-well microtiter plates were coated overnight at 4° C with Pg and Pm (100 µL, 5 µg/mL in the presence of 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF]) or the N-terminal Pg peptide (100 µL, 20 µM) and postcoated with 0.4% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). The
MI-domain (100 µL, 10 µg/mL) as a fusion with GST was added for 1 hour at 25° C, the plates were washed, and anti-GST mAb was added. The bound
MI-domain was quantitated after the reaction with goat antimouse IgG conjugated with alkaline phosphatase. Nonspecific binding of the
MI-domain to PVA-coated wells was subtracted.
To measure the binding of soluble Pg to the immobilized
MI-domain, microtiter plates were coated with free
MI-domain (100 µL, 5.0 µg/mL) and postcoated with 0.4% PVA. 125I-Pg (100 µL per well, 20 µg/mL, 106 cpm) was added with or without the peptide P2 (100 µM), tranexamic acid (5 mM), or
-ACA (50 mM). After 60 minutes of incubation at 25° C, the wells were washed with TBSTween 20, the bound Pg was eluted with 200 µLof1%SDS5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) at 60° C for 30 minutes, and the radioactivity was measured.
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) studies
Binding parameters for the interaction of soluble Glu-Pg with the
MI-domain were measured by using a Biacore 3000 SPR-based biosensor (Biacore, Uppsala, Sweden). The
MI-domain was coupled with a CM5 chip (Biacore) at a concentration of 1100 response units according to the manufacturer's protocol. Different concentrations of Glu-Pg in HSB-P buffer (Biacore; 10 mM HEPES [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 0.005% polysorbate 20 adjusted to 1 mM MgCl2) were flowed over the chip containing the
MI-domain. All data were corrected for the response obtained using a blank reference flow cell that was activated with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethyl aminopropyl) carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide (EDC/NHS) and then blocked with ethanolamine. Steady-state experiments were performed by injecting the
MI-domain at 10 µL/min for 8 minutes. The chip surface was regenerated with 2 M NaCl and 50 mM NaOH. Data were analyzed using the BIAevaluation 3.1 program. Nonspecific binding to the blank flow cell was subtracted.
Binding of 125I-Pg to cells in suspension
Neutrophils,
M
2-expressing HEK 293, or U937 cells were washed in Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS) and resuspended in the same media containing 0.1% BSA. Cells (107/mL) were incubated with 125I-Pg (10 µg/mL, 5 x 105 cpm/mL) in the presence or absence of mAb 44a (40 µg/mL), mAb IB4 (30 µg/mL), tranexamic acid (5 mM), and phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) (10 nM) in a total volume 150 µLat 25° C for 30 minutes; 50 µL aliquots were layered over 300 µL of 20% sucrose in HBSS-BSA and centrifuged for 3 minutes in a Beckman microfuge (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA). The tube tips were amputated, and radioactivity was counted in a gamma counter.
Pg activation by cultured cells.
A total of 1.5 x 106 U937 monocytoid,
M
2-expressing, or mock-transfected HEK 293 cells in HBSS were incubated in the solution containing the chromogenic substrate S-2251 (0.7 mM) in the presence or absence of Glu-Pg (7.0 µg/mL), anti-
M (mAb 44a), anti-
5
1 (mAb 1950), anti-
1 (1965), and t-PA (70 ng/mL) in a total volume of 150 µL at 25° C. Absorbance was measured at 405 nm after 180 minutes, and absorbance of the samples that did not contain cells or Pg was subtracted.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous in vitro studies demonstrated that Pg is capable of interacting with ECM proteins, including fibronectin, laminin, collagen IV, and fibrin.7,8,23,24,38 In 2 recent reports, Pg was found in the atherosclerotic plaque11 and in the zona pellucida of mammalian oocytes.39 However, the pattern of Pg deposition within the ECM has not been investigated. Therefore, we have examined whether Pg localizes with fibronectin and fibrinogen within the ECM produced by live cells using immunofluorescence. WI38 human lung fibroblasts were cultured to confluence in the presence or absence of fibrinogen, and then soluble Glu-Pg was added to cell layers. After several days in culture, fibroblasts develop an extensive extracellular fibronectin matrix (Figure 1A-B). Coculturing of fibrinogen with cells resulted in deposition of fibrin(ogen) into the matrix (Figure 1C). Binding of exogenous Glu-Pg to fibronectin- or fibrinogen-containing matrices was demonstrated by staining the matrix with anti-Pg antibodies (Figure 1E-F). The presence of endogenous Pg was not detected (Figure 1D). The fibrillar pattern of Pg staining was similar to that of fibronectin and fibrinogen, indicating that Glu-Pg binds to these proteins within the ECM and potentially can serve as an adhesive ligand for cell surface integrins.
|
Adhesion of
M
2-expressing cells to Pg and its derivatives
We have previously demonstrated that integrin
M
2 can bind Glu-Pg.25 Therefore, adhesion of the
M
2-expressing HEK 293 cells to immobilized Glu-Pg was examined further. As shown in Figure 2, Pg supported efficient adhesion, which was dependent on the concentration of Pg used. The specificity of the
M
2-Pg interaction was determined using function-blocking antibodies directed to the
M (mAb 44a) and
2 (mAb IB4) subunits. Cell adhesion was reduced by both mAbs (Figure 2, shown for mAb 44a). Monoclonal antibodies inhibited adhesion more effectively at the low Pg concentrations: at 1.5 to 2 µg/mL Pg, mAb 44a inhibited adhesion by about 90% to 75%, whereas about 50% inhibition was achieved at higher coating concentrations of Pg. Specificity of the interaction between
M
2 and Pg was also confirmed by the finding that at 100 µM, the fibrinogen peptide P2, a specific inhibitor of
M
2-ligand interactions,25,28 abolished adhesion to Glu-Pg by 90% (not shown). Mock-transfected cells also adhered to Glu-Pg, but the level of adhesion was about 1.6 times lower than that of the
M
2-expressing cells, and mAb 44a did not block adhesion. Thus, these results suggest that
M
2 can mediate adhesion to Pg and that other cell surface molecules may contribute to adhesion (see below).
|
We next examined whether Pm, the proteolytically active form of Pg, supports
M
2-mediated adhesion. As shown in Figure 3A, Pm supported a much lower extent of adhesion than Glu-Pg; at 5 µg/mL coating concentration, about 3.5-fold fewer cells adhered to Pm. The low level of cell adhesion mediated by Pm could not be attributed to its proteolytic activity because Pm was inactivated by phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) prior to immobilization onto the plastic. Because Pm varies from its native zymogen form, Glu-Pg, by the absence of the N-terminal peptide (residues 1 to about 78), we tested cell adhesion to the Lys-Pg form, which also lacks this segment. No cell adhesion to immobilized Lys-Pg was detected at any concentration of coated protein (Figure 3A). In parallel experiments, almost equal signals were obtained using anti-Pg polyclonal antibodies, indicating that similar amounts of Glu-Pg, Lys-Pm, and Lys-Pg were immobilized (not shown). The difference in the adhesion-promoting activity between Glu-Pg and its N-terminally truncated derivatives prompted us to examine the ability of the 78-residue N-terminal Pg domain to support adhesion. When immobilized on microtiter plates, the N-terminal fragment supported efficient adhesion of the
M
2-expressing cells, and the cell treatment with mAb 44a inhibited adhesion completely (Figure 3B). These data suggested that the N-terminal domain of Pg contains the
M
2-binding site. However, on a molar basis, about 340-fold higher coating concentrations of the N-terminal fragment were required for maximal adhesion than that of Pg, suggesting that other site(s) in Pg can contribute to its binding to
M
2.
|
To probe the structural requirements of
M
2 binding, the interactions of Glu-Pg, Pm, and the N-terminal fragment with the
MI-domain were tested. Previous data demonstrated that within
M
2, the independently folded 24 kDa
MI-domain is responsible for binding of several ligands.40 Initially, we examined the ability of the integrin, in which the
MI-domain was deleted by genetic manipulation, to interact with Glu-Pg. Adhesion of cells expressing the "I-less" integrin was about 10% of that of wild-type
M
2-expressing cells, suggesting the requirement of the
MI-domain in Pg recognition (these experiments were performed in the presence of anti-
5
1; not shown). To substantiate the role of the
MI-domain, Glu-Pg, Lys-Pm, and the N-terminal fragment were immobilized on microtiter plates, and their interactions with soluble
MI-domain were tested. Each of the proteins bound the
MI-domain (Figure 4), with Glu-Pg being the most active substrate, and the interactions were inhibited by the fibrinogen peptide P2. Because this peptide binds to the site within the
MI-domain implicated in binding of several
M
2 ligands,25 these data suggest that the common ligand-binding site of the
MI-domain is involved in binding to Pg. However, the additional interactions of the
MI-domain may account for the incomplete inhibition. Taken together, these observations demonstrate that the
MI-domain within
M
2 is the critical structure for Glu-Pg binding.
|
The expression of cell surface binding sites for Pg was shown previously for many cells, including leukocytes, and was implicated in generating the proteolytic activity required for degradation of the ECM during leukocyte migration (reviewed by Plow et al6). Therefore, we have investigated whether
M
2 serves as a cell surface receptor for soluble Pg by measuring the binding of Glu-Pg to the
M
2-expressing cells in suspension. As shown in Figure 5A, the incubation of cells with 125I-Glu-Pg resulted in its binding, but neither anti-
M
2 mAb inhibited this interaction. Similar results were obtained when the binding of Glu-Pg was tested indirectly by measuring the activity of Pm generated upon the conversion of cell-bound Glu-Pg in the presence of t-PA (not shown). In contrast, the carboxy-terminal lysine analog tranexamic acid, at 5 mM, inhibited the Pg binding completely. This is in agreement with previous findings that the binding of soluble Pg to cell surfaces is mediated by its LBS.41 Also, when the immobilized
MI-domain was tested for its ability to bind soluble 125I-Glu-Pg, only tranexamic acid and
-ACA inhibited the interaction whereas the P2 peptide was not effective (Figure 5B). To characterize the binding of soluble Glu-Pg with the
MI-domain further, we have determined the dissociation constant (Kd) for this interaction using surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Figure 5C shows that the binding of Glu-Pg to the
MI-domain was dose dependent and saturable. The Scatchard plot constructed from the binding data (Figure 5C, inset in the bottom panel) demonstrated the presence of a major class of binding sites with a Kd of 0.3 ± 0.01 µM, which falls within the range reported for the interactions of Pg LBSs with cells (reviewed by Plow et al42). Taken together, these analyses suggest that soluble Glu-Pg can bind the
MI-domain entirely through the Pg LBSs and that the specific ligand-binding site of the
MI-domain is engaged with the immobilized Glu-Pg only. This pattern of binding is consistent with the conclusion that
M
2 utilizes different mechanisms for binding of the 2 forms of Glu-Pg (immobilized versus soluble). Such differential ligand recognition is a hallmark of many integrins, including
M
2.43,44
|
Integrin
5
1 contributes to cell adhesion to Pg
The above findings (Figure 2) showed that function-blocking antibodies directed against
M
2 were not able to inhibit adhesion of the
M
2-expressing cells to Pg completely. To test whether other integrins are involved in cell adhesion to Pg, mock-transfected HEK 293 cells were tested. The cells efficiently adhered to Glu-Pg but not Pm (Figure 6A). Because HEK 293 cells express several
1 integrins, with
5
1 being the predominant integrin species,34 the effect of function-blocking antibodies against these integrins was tested. Anti-
5
1 and anti-
1 antibodies inhibited adhesion to Glu-Pg by about 50% (shown for anti-
5
1 antibody 1950). These antibodies inhibited cell adhesion to fibronectin completely. As a control, anti-
M
2 blocking reagents (mAb 44a and P2) had no effect on adhesion of HEK 293 cells. To ascribe the contribution of the anti-integrinresistant component of adhesion to the function of Pg LBSs, cell adhesion was conducted in the presence of tranexamic acid. At 5 mM, tranexamic acid inhibited cell adhesion by 50%, and a combination of anti-
5
1 Ab 1950 and tranexamic acid blocked adhesion by 90%. To determine if
5
1-mediated adhesion to Glu-Pg occurs with cells other than HEK 293 cells, we tested K562 human erythroleukemic cells. These cells express integrin
5
1 and do not express
M
2. As shown in Figure 6B, Glu-Pg supported efficient adhesion of K562 cells, and adding anti-
5
1 antibody 1950 inhibited adhesion by about 75%. In addition, the LBS of Glu-Pg participated in K562 cell adhesion because tranexamic acid alone blocked adhesion by 35%. A combination of anti-
5
1 and tranexamic acid decreased adhesion more effectively (95%) than either agent separately.
|
To extend our findings with transfected cells, we examined whether Glu-Pg and Pm can support adhesion of blood neutrophils. Neutrophils express
5
1 and
M
2, and the latter can be up-regulated further by agonist stimulation. Neutrophils isolated from fresh human blood adhered to both Glu-Pg and Pm, with Glu-Pg being a 2- to 3-fold better substrate. Activation with 100 nM fMLP increased adhesion to Pg and Pm by about 5-fold (not shown). To dissect the contribution of specific integrin-binding sites and LBSs, neutrophil adhesion to Glu-Pg was tested in the presence of tranexamic acid and integrin-specific mAbs. As shown in Figure 7, inhibition of the LBSs decreased adhesion of fMLP-activated neutrophils to Glu-Pg by only 23%, and anti-
M
2 and anti-
5
1 alone produced 66% and 28% inhibition, respectively. The combination of each mAb with tranexamic acid inhibited adhesion more effectively, and the treatment of neutrophils with a mixture of 2 mAbs and tranexamic acid resulted in the almost complete inhibition of adhesion. These results suggest that adhesion of neutrophils to Glu-Pg depends on both integrins
M
2 and
5
1 and that the LBSs of Glu-Pg contribute to adhesion by binding to cell surface proteins. The participation of the 2 integrins and LBSs in adhesion to Glu-Pg was also demonstrable with U937 cells (not shown).
|
5
1-mediated Pg activation
Previous studies demonstrated that Pg binding to cells through the LBSs enhanced its activation by t-PA. To test whether Pg-integrin interactions are accompanied by Pg activation, we have measured the Pm activity generated in the cell suspension containing Glu-Pg in the presence or absence of anti-
M, anti-
5
1, or anti-
1 function-blocking antibodies. Anti-
5
1 and anti-
1 inhibited Glu-Pg activation in a concentration-dependent manner on the 3 cell lines tested, including the
M
2-expressing, mock-transfected HEK 293, and U937 monocytoid cells (Figure 8, shown for U937 cells). The maximal inhibition achieved with both antibodies was about 50% to 55%. The binding of Glu-Pg to
5
1 on these cells appears to be RGD independent because the RGD peptide at 100 µM did not inhibit Glu-Pg activation. With each cell line, the function-blocking mAb 44a (against
M) did not affect Glu-Pg activation whereas tranexamic acid decreased the activation by 55% ± 6%. Although addition of t-PA stimulated Glu-Pg activation, it did not change the inhibitory effect of anti-
5
1 (not shown). The ability of anti-
5
1 antibody to interfere with Glu-Pg activation indicates that in contrast to
M
2,
5
1 can recognize both immobilized and soluble Glu-Pg. Moreover, because generation of the Pm activity was detected in the absence of exogenously added Pg activators, the data suggest that
5
1 is involved in Pg activation.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
M
2 and
5
1; (3) the Pg LBSs contribute to adhesion by binding cell surface lysines; and (4) cell-associated Glu-Pg activation is inhibited by anti-
5
1 mAb. The ability of Pg to support adhesion has been demonstrated with various cells expressing both
M
2 and
5
1, including neutrophils, cultured U937 monocytoid cells, and genetically engineered cells. Recent studies of Pg interactions have focused on the binding of soluble Pg to cells and provided a good understanding of events that occur during the assembly of the Pg system on cell surfaces. Similar to other proteins such as fibrinogen, vitronectin, fibronectin, and others, plasminogen can exist in 2 states: as a soluble plasma protein and in association with insoluble extracellular matrix. Previous in vitro studies demonstrated that Pg and its activators, t-PA and u-PA, bind to the components of the ECM and the basement membrane.7,8,23,24 Pg also can be found within inflamed tissues11 where it was apparently derived from circulation. Although the predominant source of Pg is the liver, recent studies demonstrated a broad expression of Pg mRNA in murine45 and several human tissues46 and hypothesized that the extrahepatic organs may be local sources of Pg in vivo. Therefore, cell binding to Pg incorporated into the ECM could have been envisioned; however, this potential mechanism of cell interactions with Pg has not been distinguished in previous studies. Accordingly, we have examined the role of Pg in supporting cell adhesion mediated by integrins.
We demonstrated that immobilized Pg supports efficient cell adhesion, and integrins
M
2 and
5
1 contribute to this process. Identification of
M
2 as a receptor for Pg was based on inhibition of cell adhesion by function-blocking mAbs to this receptor and on the interaction of Pg with the recombinant
MI-domain. The integrin
M
2 is expressed mainly on phagocytic leukocytes and mediates important leukocyte functions during the inflammatory responses.47
M
2 is a multiligand receptor that recognizes a variety of different molecules, including many ECM proteins (reviewed by Yakubenko et al25). Several proteases, including neutrophil elastase,48 myeloperoxidase,49 and catalase,44 have been previously demonstrated to bind
M
2. The present study extends this group of
M
2 ligands to include Pg. Within
M
2, the
MI-domain is primarily responsible for its ligand-binding properties40 and, accordingly, Pg falls into the category of ligands that bind this domain. Also, consistent with previous findings of ligand-binding properties of
2 integrins, the related leukocyte integrin
L
2 (CD11a/CD18, lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 [LFA-1]), which has a narrow ligand-binding specificity, does not bind Pg.25
We have found a distinction in the way immobilized and soluble Pg engage the
MI-domain. The interaction between the immobilized Pg and
M
2 was mediated by a specific ligand-binding site in the
MI-domain and the complementary site in Pg inasmuch as it was blocked by the specific inhibitor of
M
2, the peptide P2. In addition, the Pg LBSs contribute to the interaction with the
MI-domain because lysine analogs tranexamic acid or
-ACA blocked cell adhesion to Pg. In contrast, binding of soluble Pg to immobilized
MI-domain was mediated only by the Pg LBSs because tranexamic acid and
-ACA completely inhibited this interaction whereas
M
2 blocking agents were not effective. Tranexamic acid also fully blocked the binding of soluble Pg to cells in suspension, suggesting that even if
M
2 does participate in Pg binding, this should involve
M
2 lysines. The proposed molecular interactions of
M
2 with 2 forms of Pg are depicted in Figure 9. Previous studies demonstrated that stimulation of neutrophils with PMA