Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 September 2004, Vol. 104, No. 6, pp. 1592.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R. P.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow


InsideBlood

IMMUNOBIOLOGY

Comment on Teeling et al, page 1793

CD20 Trek: the next generation

Ronald P. Taylor

UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA

A collaboration between investigators in basic science and biotechnology has produced a new set of human mAbs which may have superior efficacy in the immunotherapy of B-cell lymphoma.

Teeling and colleagues have demonstrated that slower may be better when the issue is the relationship between the rate of dissociation of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from B cells and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). Based on the notable but only partial success of anti-CD20 mAb rituximab (RTX) in B-cell lymphoma treatment, the authors developed candidates for the next generation of anti-CD20 mAbs. Clinical investigations and basic science studies with RTX have raised important questions regarding its cell-killing mechanism(s) and the reasons why RTX is effective for only about half of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), with less success in treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).1,2 Complete elucidation of the RTX in vivo mechanism should facilitate design of optimized treatment paradigms for mAb-based targeting of B-cell-associated CD20.Go



Caption to come. See the complete figure in the article beginning on page 1793.

 

Most CLL patient B cells are resistant to RTX-mediated CDC, presumably due to the combination of enhanced expression of complement regulatory proteins and relatively low CD20 expression compared with levels in NHL.1,2 Teeling et al provide compelling evidence that 2 fully human high-affinity anti-CD20 mAbs effectively promote CDC in a variety of B cells, many of which are resistant to RTX. In the presence of complement, immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) mAbs 2F2 and 7D8 lyse B-cell lines and isolated patient CLL cells.

Cell-bound mAbs 2F2 and 7D8 apparently induce greater CDC than RTX because they dissociate more slowly from targeted cells, thus increasing their biologically active concentration on the cell surface. Therefore, the cell-bound mAbs can more effectively engage and activate C1q and interact with downstream-activated complement components including C4b and C3b. The authors recognize that, based on steady-state considerations, 2 different mAbs may bind to B cells at the same CD20 epitopes with comparable levels of saturation, but the slower dissociating mAb will activate complement more effectively because there will be more time for mAb aggregates (2 or more IgGs) to interact with C1q. Covalent deposition of C3b should occur in close proximity to cell-bound mAbs3,4; although the authors did not evaluate C3 fragment deposition, in whole blood these mAbs should facilitate deposition of 100 000 or more C3b/iC3b molecules per cell.3 Therefore, the mAbs may also enhance antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity by promoting synergy between Fc receptors and complement receptor 3, which binds iC3b, the breakdown product of C3b.4

Increasing evidence argues that complement plays an important role in the RTX mechanism,5 and therefore, mAbs 2F2 and 7D8 may be more effective clinically than RTX. However, several caveats are in order. Rapid complement activation and cell lysis may induce serious side effects,1 and careful consideration of clinical and laboratory parameters will be required to optimize the treatment dose of mAb as well as its infusion rate. Moreover, the usual high dose of RTX (375 mg/m2), when used in CLL treatment, induces acute loss of CD204; therefore, whether the new anti-CD20 mAbs promote CD20 loss in CLL must be evaluated.

The mAbs developed and characterized by Teeling et al provide a powerful and reasoned extension in mAb-based immunotherapy. The simple and elegant paradigms set forth in the paper may ultimately be applicable to other tumor-associated antigens.

References

  1. Huhn D, von Schilling C, Wilhelm M, et al. Rituximab therapy of patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2001;98: 1326-1331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Manches O, Lui G, Chaperot L, et al. In vitro mechanisms of action of rituximab on primary non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Blood. 2003;101: 949-954.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Kennedy AD, Solga MD, Schuman TA, et al. An anti-C3b(i) mAb enhances complement activation, C3b(i) deposition, and killing of CD20+ cells by Rituximab. Blood. 2003;101: 1071-1079.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Kennedy AD, Beum PV, Solga MD, et al. Rituximab infusion promotes rapid complement depletion and acute CD20 loss in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Immunol. 2004;172: 3280-3288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. di Gaetano N, Cittera E, Nota R, et al. Complement activation determines the therapeutic activity of rituximab in vivo. J Immunol. 2003;171: 1581-1587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Characterization of new human CD20 monoclonal antibodies with potent cytolytic activity against non-Hodgkin lymphomas
Jessica L. Teeling, Ruth R. French, Mark S. Cragg, Jeroen van den Brakel, Marielle Pluyter, Haichun Huang, Claude Chan, Paul W. H. I. Parren, C. Erik Hack, Michael Dechant, Thomas Valerius, Jan G. J. van de Winkel, and Martin J. Glennie
Blood 2004 104: 1793-1800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R. P.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2004 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020