Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 1 January 2005, Vol. 105, No. 1, pp. 111-114.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on July 1, 2004; DOI 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1306.


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figure
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2004-04-1306v1
105/1/111    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells
Right arrow Hemostasis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Right arrow Brief Reports
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

HEMATOPOIESIS
Brief report

Modulation of hematopoietic and endothelial cell differentiation from mouse embryonic stem cells by different culture conditions

Wen Jie Zhang, Changwon Park, Elizabeth Arentson, and Kyunghee Choi

From the Department of Pathology and Immunology, Developmental Biology Program, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 
Embryonic stem (ES) cells can differentiate into many different somatic cells in culture. To better correlate hematopoietic and endothelial cell differentiation of ES cells in currently available protocols, we compared fetal liver kinase-1 (Flk-1)–, stem cell leukemia (Scl)–, and vascular endothelial–cadherin (VE-cadherin)–expressing cells generated in embryoid bodies (EBs) and on OP9 cells. We report that the kinetics of Scl and Flk-1 expression were similar in EBs and OP9 cells, although Flk-1 expression was extended on OP9 cells. CD45+ and Ter-119+ cells developed more efficiently in EBs, whereas VE-cadherin+ cells developed largely on OP9 cells. Cell sorting and replating studies showed that Scl+ cells, not Flk-1+ or VE-cadherin+ cells, were enriched for primitive and definitive hematopoietic progenitors. Our studies indicate that optimal hematopoietic and endothelial cell differentiation occur in EBs and on OP9 cells, respectively. Regardless of the culture systems used, Scl is the most relevant marker for enriching primitive and definitive hematopoietic progenitors.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 
There is great interest in generating different types of somatic cells from in vitro–differentiated embryonic stem (ES) cells, as they can potentially be used for therapies for human diseases for which there are currently no effective treatments. Accordingly, many studies are aimed toward understanding mechanisms for maintaining the stem cell state and pathways leading to lineage specification. Successful generation and application of ES-derived somatic cells will require reproducible protocols to obtain desired cell types. There are currently 2 widely used protocols to generate blood and blood vessel cells in culture. In the first protocol, ES cells differentiate and form 3-dimensional cell masses called embryoid bodies (EBs).1-5 In the second protocol, ES cells differentiate on type IV collagen or stromal cells, such as OP9, in 2-dimensional sheets.6-8

In both the EB and OP9 culture systems, primitive erythroid cells develop prior to the definitive erythroid cell population.2,6 In addition, the putative common progenitor of hematopoietic and endothelial cells, the hemangioblast, has been reported to develop within EBs and on OP9 cells.7,9 Endothelial cells also develop in both culture systems.3-5,8 While these studies would argue that these 2 different methods could be used interchangeably, there has not yet been a systematic comparison of whether hematopoietic and endothelial cell development proceeds in parallel in these 2 culture systems. To better correlate hematopoietic and endothelial cell differentiation in EBs and the OP9 system, we compared fetal liver kinase-1 (Flk-1), stem cell leukemia (Scl), CD45, Ter-119, and vascular endothelial–cadherin (VE-cadherin) expression and performed cell sorting and hematopoietic replating studies. We demonstrate that hematopoietic cells develop more efficiently in EBs, whereas endothelial cell maturation is better supported by OP9 cells. We further demonstrate that Scl, not VE-cadherin, is ideal for isolating hematopoietic progenitors.


    Study design
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 
Scl+/hCD4 ES culture and hematopoietic colony assays were performed as described previously.10,11 EBs were formed in 20% fetal calf serum (FCS; preselected lot) in {alpha}–modified Eagle minimum essential medium ({alpha}-MEM) with ascorbic acid (50 µg/mL), L-glutamine (2 mM), and monothioglycerol (MTG; 4.5 x 10-4 M). OP9 differentiation was carried out in 20% FCS (preselected lot) in {alpha}-MEM.6 OP9 cells were treated with mitomycin C prior to ES seeding and differentiation, as the mitomycin C treatment consistently gave a higher number of differentiated cells (Supplemental Figure S1, available on the Blood website; see the Supplemental Figure link at the top of the online article). Cell staining and fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analyses were carried out as described previously,10,11 except that differentiated cells were dissociated with collagenase (0.25%; Sigma, St Louis, MO) and anti-CD45 antibody used in this study was biotin labeled (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA).


    Results and discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 
To compare hematopoietic and endothelial cell differentiation in EBs and the OP9 system, we used Scl+/hCD4 ES cells.10 As a first step, we compared the kinetics of Flk-1, Scl, and VE-cadherin expression. As previously reported10 and shown in Figure 1A, Flk-1 was readily detectable by day 2.75 in EBs. Flk-1+ cells continued to develop up to day 4 and declined thereafter. Cells expressing Flk-1 were also readily detectable on OP9 cells. A similar percentage of Flk-1+ cells was detected in EBs and OP9 cells until day 4. However, Flk-1 expression was prolonged when ES cells were differentiated on OP9 cells, such that Flk-1+ cells were still present at higher levels at later times: 13.4% (19.3% ± 5.1%) in day-6 EBs versus 37.7% (40.5% ± 3.4%) in OP9 cells (Student t test P value < .01). Scl-expressing (ie, human CD4 [hCD4]–expressing) cells developed slowly in EBs but expanded rapidly between days 4 and 5. About 60% to 70% of the total cells expressed hCD4 at days 5 to 7. On OP9, a higher percentage of cells expressed hCD4 at early time points: 8% (7.7% ± 1.8%) in day-3 EBs versus 29% (28.6% ± 6.6%) on OP9 cells (P < .05). However, the percentage of hCD4+ cells detected at later times (days 5-7) was similar in both EBs and OP9 cells. While most of hCD4+ cells present in days 5 to 7 EBs did not express Flk-1, a higher percentage of hCD4+ cells also expressed Flk-1 when ES cells were differentiated on OP9 cells. As hCD4–single-positive cells were more abundant in EB cells, we examined CD45 and Ter-119 expression patterns. As shown in Figure 1B, a higher percentage of CD45 (~7% [7.1% ± 1.1%] in day-6 EBs vs ~2.7% [3.5% ± 1.5%] in OP9 cells; P < .01) and Ter-119 (~4.5% [3.9% ± 0.5%] in day-6 EBs vs ~1.1% [1.9% ± 0.8%] in OP9-expressing cells; P < .05) was readily detectable in EBs. This suggests that hematopoietic differentiation was achieved more efficiently within EBs.



View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.. Kinetic analyses of Flk-1, Scl, VE-cadherin, CD45, and Ter-119 expression. In vitro–differentiated Scl+/hCD4 ES cells during EB and OP9 differentiation (from day 2.75 to day 7) were subjected to FACS analyses for Flk-1, hCD4, VE-cadherin (A) and CD45 and Ter119 (B) expression. Numbers in a given box indicate the percentage of each population. In each 2-row group of scatterplots, the top row shows EB differentiation while the bottom row shows OP9 differentiation.

 

VE-cadherin–expressing cells developed very poorly in EBs. On OP9 cells, however, VE-cadherin expression was readily detectable. VE-cadherin was first detected at day 2.25 (data not shown) and about 10% (14.4% ± 3.6%) of the cells at day 3 (Figure 1A) expressed VE-cadherin. VE-cadherin expression increased up to day 5 and then gradually decreased. By day 6, about 16% (16.7% ± 2%) of the cells expressed VE-cadherin. More important, VE-cadherin+ cells at all stages (days 2.75-7) were always within the Flk-1+ hCD4+ cell population (Figures 1 and 2A). Our data suggest that endothelial progenitors will develop in EBs and OP9 cells, but that endothelial cell maturation, based on VE-cadherin expression, occurs more efficiently in the OP9 system. Thus, the Flk-1–expressing cells present at later times on OP9 cells would represent mature endothelial cells. Consistent with this interpretation, Flk-1+ cells, sorted from OP9 culture 6 days after differentiation, showed poor endothelial cell replating (data not shown).As our previous studies demonstrated that Flk-1+ cells sorted from day-6 EBs exhibited a robust endothelial cell differentiation,10 we propose that endothelial progenitors developing on OP9 cells concomitantly differentiate into VE-cadherin+ endothelial cells, whereas endothelial progenitors developing in EBs cannot. OP9-derived factor(s) could play a role in this process. Alternatively, a simple 2-dimensional culture condition could be sufficient.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.. Hematopoietic cells develop from Scl-expressing cells. (A) VE-cadherin–expressing cells also express Flk-1 and Scl. Scl+/hCD4 ES cells differentiated on OP9 for 6 days were subjected to FACS analyses for Flk-1, hCD4, and VE-cadherin expression. Based on the FACS data, the relationship between Flk-1–, Scl-, and VE-cadherin–expressing cells is presented in a Venn diagram (B). (C) VE-cadherin is not a marker for definitive hematopoietic cells. ES cells were differentiated on OP9 for 6 days, sorted for VE-cadherin- and VE-cadherin+ cells, and replated. Subsequently, erythroid/macrophage mixed colonies were subjected to globin gene analyses as described.10 As shown, erythroid cells developing from both VE-cadherin- and VE-cadherin+ cell populations expressed the {beta}-major globin gene. N indicates H2O, negative control; P, RNA from day 3 EBs, positive control. L32, ribosomal subunit protein is shown as a loading control.

 

To better define Scl and VE-cadherin expression in primitive erythroid and definitive hematopoietic progenitors,10,12 ES cells differentiated on OP9 cells were collected on day 4; sorted for hCD4+VE-cadherin+, hCD4+VE-cadherin-, or hCD4-VE-cadherin- cells; and replated for primitive erythroid colonies.As shown in Table 1, hCD4+VE-cadherin- cells, compared with hCD4+VE-cadherin+, generated a higher number of primitive erythroid colonies. To determine definitive hematopoietic potential, ES cells differentiated on OP9 cells for 6 days were initially sorted for VE-cadherin+ and VE-cadherin- cell populations and subjected to hematopoietic replating and globin gene analyses. As shown in Table 2 and Figure 2B, hematopoietic colonies developed from both cell populations. The {beta}-major globin gene was also expressed in erythroid cells developed from VE-cadherin- cell populations (Figure 2C). Subsequently, hCD4+Flk-1+VE-cadherin+, hCD4+Flk-1+VE-cadherin-, hCD4+Flk-1-VE-cadherin-, hCD4-Flk-1+VE-cadherin-, and hCD4-Flk-1-VE-cadherin- cell populations, present in day-6 culture (Figures 1 and 2A), were sorted and replated. As shown in Table 3, definitive hematopoietic colonies developed from VE-cadherin-hCD4+Flk-1-, VE-cadherin-hCD4+Flk-1+, and VE-cadherin+hCD4+Flk-1+ cell populations. The common feature of these 3 cell populations was that they expressed hCD4. Thus, these studies suggest that Scl is the most relevant marker, not Flk-1 or VE-cadherin, for enriching primitive and definitive hematopoietic progenitors. Consistent with this interpretation, VE-cadherin knockout mice show relatively normal hematopoietic differentiation but defective endothelial cell development.13-15 Similarly, long-term repopulating potential of aorta-gonad-mesonephros (AGM)–derived cells was found in both VE-cadherin+ and VE-cadherin- cell populations.16 Finally, Scl expression prior to the generation of VE-cadherin–expressing cells could rescue hematopoietic defects in Scl-/- ES cells.17 Collectively, our studies indicate that VE-cadherin expression alone is not sufficient for isolating hematopoietic progenitors and that Scl is the most reliable marker for tracking hematopoietic differentiation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.. Primitive erythroid colonies develop from Scl+ cells

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.. VE-cadherin is not a marker for definitive hematopoietic cells

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.. Definitive hematopoietic cells develop from Scl+ cells

 


    Acknowledgements
 
We would like to thank the Choi lab members for critically reading the manuscript. We would also like to thank Toru Nakano for OP9 cells and Bill Eades for his excellent help with cell sorting.


    Footnotes
 
Submitted April 9, 2004; accepted June 7, 2004.

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, July 1, 2004; DOI 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1306.

Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [NHLBI]) R01 HL55337 and R01 HL63736 (K.C.).

The online version of this article contains a data supplement.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

Reprints: Kyunghee Choi, Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Immunology, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8118, St Louis, MO 63110; e-mail: kchoi{at}immunology.wustl.edu.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 

  1. Wiles MV, Keller G. Multiple hematopoietic lineages develop from embryonic stem (ES) cells in culture. Development. 1991;111: 259-267.[Abstract]

  2. Keller G, Kennedy M, Papayannopoulou T, Wiles MV. Hematopoietic commitment during embryonic stem cell differentiation in culture. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13: 473-486.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Vittet D, Prandini MH, Berthier R, et al. Embryonic stem cells differentiate in vitro to endothelial cells through successive maturation steps. Blood. 1996;88: 3424-3431.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Wang R, Clark R, Bautch VL. Embryonic stem cell-derived cystic embryoid bodies form vascular channels: an in vitro model of blood vessel development. Development. 1992;114: 303-316.[Abstract]

  5. Flamme I, Risau W. Induction of vasculogenesis and hematopoiesis in vitro. Development. 1992; 116: 435-459.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  6. Nakano T, Kodama H, Honjo T. Generation of lymphohematopoietic cells from embryonic stem cells in culture. Science. 1994;265: 1098-1101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Nishikawa SI, Nishikawa S, Hirashima M, et al. Progressive lineage analysis by cell sorting and culture identifies FLK1+VE-cadherin+ cells at a diverging point of endothelial and hemopoietic lineages. Development. 1998;125: 1747-1757.[Abstract]

  8. Hirashima M, Kataoka H, Nishikawa S, et al. Maturation of embryonic stem cells into endothelial cells in an in vitro model of vasculogenesis. Blood. 1999;93: 1253-1263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  9. Choi K, Kennedy M, Kazarov A, et al. A common precursor for hematopoietic and endothelial cells. Development. 1998;125: 725-732.[Abstract]

  10. Chung YS, Zhang WJ, Arentson E, et al. Lineage analysis of the hemangioblast as defined by FLK1 and SCL expression. Development. 2002;129: 5511-5520.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Zhang WJ, Chung YS, Eades B, Choi K. Gene targeting strategies for the isolation of hematopoietic and endothelial precursors from differentiated ES cells. Methods Enzymol. 2003;365: 186-202.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  12. Fujimoto T, Ogawa M, Minegishi N, et al. Stepwise divergence of primitive and definitive haematopoietic and endothelial cell lineages during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Genes Cells. 2001;6: 1113-1127.[Abstract]

  13. Carmeliet P, Lampugnani MG, Moons L, et al. Targeted deficiency or cytosolic truncation of the VE-cadherin gene in mice impairs VEGF-mediated endothelial survival and angiogenesis. Cell. 1999;98: 147-157.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  14. Vittet D, Buchou T, Schweitzer A, et al. Targeted null-mutation in the vascular endothelial-cadherin gene impairs the organization of vascular-like structures in embryoid bodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94: 6273-6278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Gory-Faure S, Prandini MH, Pointu H, et al. Role of vascular endothelial-cadherin in vascular morphogenesis. Development. 1999;126: 2093-2102.[Abstract]

  16. North TE, de Bruijn MF, Stacy T, et al. Runx1 expression marks long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells in the midgestation mouse embryo. Immunity. 2002;16: 661-672.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  17. Endoh M, Ogawa M, Orkin S, Nishikawa S. SCL/tal-1-dependent process determines a competence to select the definitive hematopoietic lineage prior to endothelial differentiation. EMBO J. 2002;21: 6700-6708.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
S. Senju, H. Suemori, H. Zembutsu, Y. Uemura, S. Hirata, D. Fukuma, H. Matsuyoshi, M. Shimomura, M. Haruta, S. Fukushima, et al.
Genetically Manipulated Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Dendritic Cells with Immune Regulatory Function
Stem Cells, November 1, 2007; 25(11): 2720 - 2729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
R. C. R. Perlingeiro
Endoglin is required for hemangioblast and early hematopoietic development
Development, August 15, 2007; 134(16): 3041 - 3048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
G. Shinoda, K. Umeda, T. Heike, M. Arai, A. Niwa, F. Ma, H. Suemori, H. Y. Luo, D. H. K. Chui, R. Torii, et al.
{alpha}4-Integrin+ endothelium derived from primate embryonic stem cells generates primitive and definitive hematopoietic cells
Blood, March 15, 2007; 109(6): 2406 - 2415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
H. Shibata, N. Ageyama, Y. Tanaka, Y. Kishi, K. Sasaki, S. Nakamura, S.-i. Muramatsu, S. Hayashi, Y. Kitano, K. Terao, et al.
Improved Safety of Hematopoietic Transplantation with Monkey Embryonic Stem Cells in the Allogeneic Setting
Stem Cells, June 1, 2006; 24(6): 1450 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. L. Olsen, D. L. Stachura, and M. J. Weiss
Designer blood: creating hematopoietic lineages from embryonic stem cells
Blood, February 15, 2006; 107(4): 1265 - 1275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figure
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2004-04-1306v1
105/1/111    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells
Right arrow Hemostasis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Right arrow Brief Reports
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020