Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 1 June 2005, Vol. 105, No. 11, pp. 4159-4160.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smyth, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Trapani, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smyth, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Trapani, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow


InsideBlood

IMMUNOBIOLOGY

Comment on Clementi et al, page 4424

Immune surveillance of lymphoma in humans?

Mark J. Smyth, Ilia Voskoboinik, and Joseph A. Trapani

PETER MACCALLUM CANCER CENTRE

Perforin mutations may predispose some individuals to lymphoma, supporting the concept that key immune molecules may act as extrinsic tumor suppressors.

In an exciting development, Clementi and colleagues have found that a proportion of patients with Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma and displaying at least some of the common manifestations of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) harbor mono (4/29) or biallelic (4/29) mutations of their perforin genes. Perforin is a unique cytolytic protein expressed in cytotoxic lymphocytes, including natural killer (NK) cells and various cytotoxic T-cell subsets, where it is indispensable for lymphocyte granule-mediated death of target cells.1 Perforin-deficient mice have severe defects of cell-mediated immune surveillance of pathogens and transformed cells,1 and most (approximately 60%) develop aggressive B-cell lymphoma.2 At first glance, the study by Clementi and colleagues provides a possible link between perforin mutations in humans and failure of immune surveillance to prevent lymphoma development and growth.

In humans, biallelic mutations of the perforin gene, causing either complete lack or severe deficiency of the encoded protein, have been found in approximately 60% of familial HLH patients.3 HLH is a life-threatening disease of early childhood, associated with profound immune derangement and the clinical syndrome of fever, hepatosplenomegaly, pancytopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypofibrinogenemia, and often, neurological dysfunction. The underlying trigger for disease is a failure of perforin-mediated cytotoxicity in the face of an immune challenge or disturbance that remains poorly characterized in humans. Interestingly, perforin-deficient mice reared in specific pathogen–free conditions do not frequently develop HLH, although they do develop a disease mimicking HLH when infected with the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV).4

The study by Clementi et al is preliminary and a much larger cohort of patients with Hodgkin and other lymphomas need to be screened to confirm the initial findings. If validated, the study also raises the surprising finding that a single normal perforin allele is insufficient to prevent an HLH-like illness. Classically, HLH is considered an autosomal recessive disorder, and parents of affected children ("carriers") remain healthy. Recently, it has been shown that the majority of HLH-associated missense mutations resulted either in the complete loss or a dramatic reduction in cytolytic activity of perforin.5 With respect to perforin polymorphisms, the epidemiological, clinical, and in vitro reports strongly suggested that N252S was a neutral polymorphism. By contrast, the effect of perforin polymorphism A91V is yet to be fully understood. Two recent studies both indicated that A91V polymorphism affected the stability and, consequently, reduced the lytic activity of perforin by approximately 50%.5,6 The recent results strongly suggest that the combination of A91V and a detrimental mutation in the second allele may, at the very least, predispose an individual to HLH and/or significantly affect their immune surveillance. There is also a theoretical possibility that A91V homozygous individuals may be predisposed to HLH or lymphomagenesis. However, heterozygotes (with the wild-type second allele) may be significantly affected only in an unlikely event of the dominant-negative effect of A91V polymorphism, and this possibility is yet to be addressed experimentally.

It remains unclear what additional factors might contribute to lymphoma development in the patients with monoallelic mutations in the present study. Notably, one of the patients harbored a mutation of the Fas gene, raising the possibility that additional immune defects might cooperatively bring about disease when perforin expression is less than optimal. Indeed, at least 3 loci other than the perforin gene have been associated with HLH-like syndromes, indicating that an alternative explanation for disease must exist in heterozygote patients reported by Clementi et al. Clementi et al also show that some of the lymphomas arising in humans with biallelic perforin mutations are of T-cell origin. This is in distinct contrast to the B-cell lymphomas and plasmacytomas developing spontaneously in perforin-deficient or FasL mutant mice.2,7 Lymphomas derived from perforin-deficient mice are uniformly major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I positive and express abundant costimulatory molecules, suggesting a lack of immune selection pressure. It will now be of great interest and importance to characterize the disease course and lymphomas arising in HLH patients in greater detail, since this cohort may be important in defining the relationship between immune dysregulation and failed immune surveillance in humans. {blacksquare}

References

  1. Trapani JA, Smyth MJ. Functional significance of the perforin/granzyme cell death pathway. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2: 735-747.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  2. Smyth MJ, Thia KY, Street SE, MacGregor D, Godfrey DI, Trapani JA. Perforin-mediated cytotoxicity is critical for surveillance of spontaneous lymphoma. J Exp Med. 2000;192: 755-760.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Stepp SE, Mathew PA, Bennett M, de Saint Basile G, Kumar V. Perforin: more than just an effector molecule. Immunol Today. 2000;21: 254-256.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. Jordan MB, Hildeman D, Kappler J, Marrack P. An animal model of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH): CD8+ T cells and interferon gamma are essential for the disorder. Blood. 2004;104: 735-743.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Voskoboinik I, Thia MC, Trapani JA. A functional analysis of the putative polymorphisms A91V and N252S, and 22 missense perforin mutations associated with familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Blood. Prepublished on March 8, 2005 as DOI 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4935.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Trambas C, Gallo F, Pende D, et al. A single amino acid change, A91V, lead to conformational changes which can impair processing to the active form of perforin. Blood. Prepublished on March 1, 2005 as DOI 10.1182/blood-2004-09-3713.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Davidson WF, Giese T, Fredrickson TN. Spontaneous development of plasmacytoid tumors in mice with defective Fas-Fas ligand interactions. J Exp Med. 1998;187: 1825-1838.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

A proportion of patients with lymphoma may harbor mutations of the perforin gene
Rita Clementi, Franco Locatelli, Loïc Dupré, Alberto Garaventa, Lorenzo Emmi, Marco Bregni, Graziella Cefalo, Antonia Moretta, Cesare Danesino, Margherita Comis, Andrea Pession, Ugo Ramenghi, Rita Maccario, Maurizio Aricò, and Maria Grazia Roncarolo
Blood 2005 105: 4424-4428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smyth, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Trapani, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smyth, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Trapani, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020