| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Blood, 1 June 2005, Vol. 105, No. 11, pp. 4353-4361. Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on February 10, 2005; DOI 10.1182/blood-2004-08-3098.
HEMOSTASIS, THROMBOSIS, AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY
Endothelial apoptosis induced by inhibition of integrins
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
v
3/
v
5 is critical for endothelial survival and angiogenesis. We have previously shown that ceramide, a proapoptotic lipid second messenger, increases during endothelial anoikis (detachment-induced apoptosis). We now show that RGDfV, an integrin
v
3/
v
5 cyclic function-blocking peptide, increased ceramide and decreased sphingomyelin in human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs) plated on vitronectin, suggesting that sphingomyelin hydrolysis contributes to RGDfV-induced ceramide increase. Desipramine and imipramine, inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase), suppressed RGDfV-induced ceramide increase. Importantly, desipramine, imipramine, and a third ASMase inhibitor, SR33557, but not inhibitors of neutral sphingomyelinase, suppressed RGDfV-induced apoptosis, suggesting that ASMase was required for integrin-mediated apoptosis. Myriocin, an inhibitor of de novo ceramide synthesis, had no effect on RGDfV-induced HBMEC apoptosis. Interestingly, ASMase inhibitors also suppressed the RGDfV-induced loss of spreading on vitronectin. RGDfV induced a similar increase in ceramide and apoptosis in HBMECs on poly-L-lysine or vitronectin, although cells detached only from vitronectin, indicating that cell detachment was not required for RGDfV-induced apoptosis. Our results suggest involvement of ASMase and ceramide in endothelial apoptosis induced by inhibition of integrins
v
3/
v
5, and propose a novel molecular mechanism for the antiangiogenic effect of RGDfV. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and
subunits. Integrins regulate functions such as cell movement, gene expression, cell cycle regulation, and cell survival, using complex signaling cascades with both inside-out as well as outside-in signaling.1-4 Integrins
v
3 and
v
5 are preferentially expressed on angiogenic endothelial cells, and their inhibition induces apoptosis.5-9 The signal mediated by
v
3 and
v
5 requires their binding to matrix proteins such as vitronectin, fibronectin, osteopontin, and tenascin. This binding is via arginineglycineaspartic acid (RGD) sequences and can be specifically abrogated by function-blocking cyclic RGDfV peptides containing this sequence.10 In vivo, inhibition of integrins
v
3 and/or
v
5 results in suppression of new blood vessel formation, disruption of existing angiogenic vasculature, inhibition of tumor growth, and tumor regression,5-8,11-13 providing rationale for inhibition of integrins
v
3 and
v
5 in antiangiogenic therapy. Indeed, one of the cyclic RGDfV peptides (cilengitide, EMD 121974), monoclonal antibodies, and other inhibitors of integrins
v
3 and/or
v
5 are currently in clinical trials that attempt to harness their antiangiogenic potential.14-17
Integrin
v
3/
v
5 signaling regulates migration, proliferation, and survival of endothelial cells, thereby affecting angiogenesis. Signaling from integrin
v
3 leads to inhibition of p53 transcriptional activity, decreased expression of p21WAF1/CIP1, and suppression of the bax cell death pathway in endothelial cells.12 However, as demonstrated in wild-type and p53-null mice, inhibition of
v-integrin ligation in developing retinas induces p21WAF1 independently of p53, underscoring the complexity and diversity of this pathway.18 On osteopontin, the
v
3-dependent signals for endothelial cell survival are mediated via nuclear factor
B (NF-
B).13 Interestingly, when its ligation to matrix is prevented, integrin
v
3 recruits caspase-8 to the cytoplasmic tail of its
-subunit to induce apoptosis in a death receptorindependent manner.19 Despite this large body of knowledge, the signaling mechanism by which inhibition of integrins
v
3 and
v
5 induces endothelial apoptosis is not well understood. This is exemplified by the observed dichotomy between increased tumor angiogenesis observed in
3/
5 knock-out mice that completely lack
v
3/
v
5,20 and the opposite, antiangiogenic effect, observed when using pharmacologic inhibition of these integrins.7,11
Stress stimuli such as irradiation, tumor necrosis factor
(TNF
), lipopolysaccharide, and some drugs such as fenretinide mediate endothelial apoptosis by generation of the intracellular lipid second messenger, ceramide.21-25 Two of the ceramide synthesis pathways that can mediate apoptosis are de novo ceramide synthesis and hydrolysis of membrane sphingomyelin by neutral and/or acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase).22,24-29 The apoptotic signal of ceramide can be transmitted by a variety of mediators, such as BAD, Ras, Raf-1,30 Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK),23 ceramide-activated protein phosphatase,31 and protein kinase C zeta,32 underscoring the complexity of these proapoptotic lipid signaling pathways. We have previously shown that inhibition of endothelial cell anchorage to matrix, including that resulting from blockade of
v integrins by the function-blocking cyclic peptide, RGDfV, increases endogenous ceramide.33 However, it is not known whether loss of
v-integrin ligation without endothelial cell detachment is sufficient to induce the ceramide increase. Moreover, it is unknown whether the increase in ceramide, induced by
v-integrin inhibition, is required for endothelial apoptosis.
In the work presented here we demonstrate that (1)
v-integrin inhibition was sufficient to increase endothelial ceramide and induce apoptosis, even without cell detachment from the matrix; (2)
v-integrin inhibition decreased cellular sphingomyelin content; and (3) inhibitors of ASMase, but not inhibitors of neutral sphingomyelinase or de novo ceramide synthesis, inhibited endothelial apoptosis induced by
v-integrin inhibition. This suggests a distinction in the mechanism of anoikis compared with integrin-mediated endothelial apoptosis, and constitutes the first studies on ceramide and ASMase in the mechanism of integrin-mediated apoptosis.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Apoptosis was assessed by staining of ethanol-fixed, RNAase-treated cells with propidium iodide (PI; 5 µg/mL in phosphate-buffered saline [PBS] containing 5 mM EDTA [ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid], 10 minutes on ice) and identifying cells with a sub-G0/G1 DNA content, indicative of apoptosis, using a Coulter Epics ELITE flow cytometer (Coulter, Miami, FL). Apoptosis was also assessed in live cells by annexin-V and PI staining and by the Apo-Direct kit, and analyzed by flow cytometry according to the manufacturer's instructions (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA).
Cell adhesion
Cells plated in 48-well nontissue culturetreated plates coated and blocked with matrix proteins were treated as indicated in figure legends. After incubation, wells were washed 3 times to remove nonadherent cells, and incubated 2 hours in 200 µL RPMI-1640 containing 250 µg/mL MTT (thiazolyl blue; 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; Sigma, St Louis, MO).34 The MTT-containing medium was removed, and remaining cells were solubilized in 200 µL dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO; 37°C, 15 minutes). Optical density (OD) was determined in a microtiter plate reader (Molecular Devices, Menlo Park, CA) at 550 nm and subtracted from OD at 650 nm.
Cell culture
Human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs; 2 different isolates) were maintained as described25,35 and used between passages 13 and 40. For RGDfV experiments, nontissue culturetreated dishes were incubated overnight at 4°C with vitronectin (2 µg/mL) or poly-L-lysine (PLL; 10 µg/mL) and then washed (PBS, 3 times). For vitronectin- and PLL/bovine serum albumin (BSA)coated plates, but not unblocked PLL, dishes were then blocked with 1% heat-inactivated fatty acidfree BSA (2 hours, 37°C) and then washed (PBS, 3 times). Peptide (RGDfV or RADfV control, in DMSO) was added 2 to 4 hours after seeding 106 HBMECs/100-mm coated plates, when the cells were already adherent and spread. C16-ceramide was prepared in dodecane-ethanol (2:98, vol/vol; 0.05% final concentration) as described36 and used in 0.1% fatty acidfree BSA in RPMI-1640.
Immunohistochemistry
HBMECs grown in chamber slides were fixed in ice-cold acetone and blocked with 2% goat serum (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). Primary antibodies used were as follows: rabbit antihuman vitronectin (1:50; Biogenesis, Kingston, NH), rabbit antihuman fibronectin (1:800; DAKO, Carpinteria, CA), and mouse antihuman tenascin (1:100; NeoMarkers, Lab Vision, Fremont, CA). Secondary antibodies used were as follows: biotinylated goat antirabbit (1:300; DAKO) and biotinylated rabbit antimouse (1:100; DAKO). Detection was with streptavidinhorseradish peroxidase (HRP, 1:300; DAKO) followed by 3,3-diaminobenzidine. Counterstain was with Mayer hematoxylin. Negative controls were as follows: rabbit universal negative control (no. 034144; DAKO) and mouse universal negative control (no. 093107; DAKO).
Radiolabeling and analysis of cellular ceramide and sphingomyelin
Ceramide was assessed as described,25,33 with some modifications. Endothelial cells (106 cells/100-mm dish) were seeded on matrix-coated plates in medium containing 0.1% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) for 2 hours. Cells were labeled with [3H]palmitic acid (1 µCi/mL [0.037 MBq], 10 mL per 100-mm dish), and RGDfV or RADfV was added either simultaneously with [3H]palmitic acid or following 6 to 24 hours of labeling. To measure sphingomyelin or ceramide in the absence of de novo synthesis, cells were prelabeled with [3H]palmitic acid for 24 hours and washed (PBS, 3 times). Cells were then trypsinized, washed, replated for 2 hours on matrix-coated plates in fresh medium lacking isotope and containing 0.1% FBS, and then incubated with RGDfV, RADfV, or vehicle control (DMSO). Cells were then collected and washed (PBS, 3 times; 4°C). Total cellular lipids were extracted using equal volumes of methanol/2% acetic acid (vol/vol), water, and chloroform. After phase separation by centrifugation, the lower phase was dried under N2 and stored at -20°C. Lipids were solubilized in chloroform/methanol (2:1, vol/vol), and aliquots were analyzed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) using commercial lipid standards as markers visualized in iodine vapors, as described.25,33,37,38 Solvent systems were chloroformacetic acid (9:1, vol/vol) for ceramide25,33,37,38 and chloroformmethanolacetic acidddH20 (50:30:7:4, vol/vol) for sphingomyelin.25,37 Tritium in the scraped TLC-resolved lipid band and total tritium in an equal aliquot of the total extracted cellular lipids were quantitated by liquid scintillation counting. The amount of [3H]ceramide or [3H]sphingomyelin is expressed as percent cpm of the total lipid tritium cpm in the aliquot. For radiographs, aliquots with identical total tritium were resolved by TLC. TLC plates were sprayed with EN3HANCE (NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA) and exposed to film (-80°C, 3-7 days).
Reagents
RGDfV (Cyclo[Arg-Gly-Asp-D-Phe-Val]; AM no. 100) and RADfV (Cyclo[Arg-Ala-Asp-D-Phe-Val]; AM no. 101) cyclic peptides, BOC-D-FMK (BOC-Asp(OMe)-fluoromethyl ketone), and myriocin (ISP-1; 2S,3R,4R,6E-2-Amino-3,4-dihydroxy-2-hydroxymethyl-14-oxo-6-eicosenoic acid) were from BIOMOL Research Laboratories (Plymouth Meeting, PA). Z-VAD-FMK (Z-Val-Ala-Asp-FMK), Z-DEVD-FMK (Z-Asp(OMe)-Glu(OMe)-Val-Asp(OMe)-CH2F), and the caspase-negative control Z-Phe-Ala-CH2F were from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Spiroepoxide ([N-[(1R)-1-(Hydroxymethyl)-2-oxo-2-[(8-oxo-1-oxaspiro[2.5]octa-4,6-dien-5-yl)amino]ethyl]decaneamid]) and epoxyquinone G109 were from Alexis Biochemicals (San Diego, CA). Fumonisin B1, desipramine, and imipramine were from Sigma. C16-cermaide was from Toronto Research Chemicals (North York, ON, Canada). [9,10-3H-(N)]Palmitic acid (50 Ci/mmol) was from Dupont NEN Research Products (Boston, MA). Lipid standards were from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL). Uniplate Silica gel G TLC plates were from Analtech (Newark, DE). Hyperfilm was from Amersham Biosciences (Piscataway, NJ). Ecolume scintillation cocktail was from ICN Biomedicals (Costa Mesa, CA). SR33557 ((2-isopropyl-1-((4-(3-N-methyl-N-(3,4-dimethoxy-b-phenethyl) amino) propyloxy) benzenesulphonyl)) indolizine) was a kind gift from Dr Jean-Marc Herbert, Sanofi-Synthelabo Recherche, Toulouse, France. All other reagents were from Sigma Chemical (St Louis, MO).
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting
Sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (10%) and Western blotting were performed as previously described.33,39,40 Primary antibodies were as follows: antitubulin, mouse monoclonal antibody, 1:10 000 (Sigma); antipoly(adenosine diphosphateribose) polymerase (PARP), rabbit polyclonal antibody, 1:1000 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 3.0c for MacIntosh (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Values are given as mean plus or minus standard error of the mean (SEM). All error bars are SEM. When 2 means are compared, P values are based on unpaired or paired t test. When 3 or more means are compared based on doses or time (ie, on a continuum), the overall P value is based on the F-test from an analysis of variance (ANOVA). All experiments were repeated at least 3 times, unless indicated otherwise. Digitization of radiographs and blots and densitometry was by Un-Scan-It Gel 4.3 for Macintosh (Silk Scientific, Orem, UT).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
v-integrin ligation does not require cell detachment
Inhibition of integrin
v
3/
v
5 ligation in endothelial cells using the function-blocking cyclic peptide, RGDfV, but not the control peptide, RADfV, induces apoptosis6,33 (Figure 1A-B). When plated on vitronectin and treated with RGDfV, HBMECs detached from the matrix within 2 to 4 hours following addition of RGDfV (Figure 1C left panels). This raised the question of whether cell detachment was required for RGDfV-induced apoptosis, that is, whether apoptosis was due to anoikis (apoptosis due to cell detachment41), or whether loss of integrin
v
3/
v
5 ligation itself, without cell detachment, was sufficient to induce apoptosis. To examine this, we seeded HBMECs on Petri dishes coated with the cationic polymer, poly-L-lysine (PLL), thus providing a matrix that is not a substrate for integrin ligation.42 To prevent potential deposition of matrix proteins by the cells, dishes were blocked with 1% heat-denatured BSA (PLL/BSA).42,43 HBMECs adhered to the PLL/BSA plates but could only minimally spread (Figure 1C right top panel). Importantly, HBMECs on PLL/BSA remained adherent to the plate at all times, and did not detach even following integrin inhibition with RGDfV (Figure 1C right bottom panel). Under these conditions, on PLL/BSA, where cells remained attached but could not engage their integrins, apoptosis in control cells was similar to that in HBMECs seeded on vitronectin and treated with RGDfV (12.0% ± 0.5% vs 16.1% ± 0.4%, respectively; n = 3), and both were higher than the 2.3% ± 0.5% baseline apoptosis observed in HBMECs on vitronectin (n = 3, P = .001; Figure 1D). Neither RGDfV nor the control peptide, RADfV, increased apoptosis on PLL/BSA beyond that observed with vehicle. Since both vitronectin and PLL/BSA plates were blocked with BSA, but baseline apoptosis increased only on PLL/BSA, this excluded possible toxicity of BSA as a cause of apoptosis. This also indicated that, although unlikely, if any integrins bound to PLL/BSA, this binding could not protect HBMECs from apoptosis.
We next examined apoptosis in HBMECs seeded on PLL that was not blocked by BSA (PLL; Figure 1C middle panels), thus providing a matrix that by itself will likely not protect from apoptosis, but that can allow deposition of matrix proteins onto the PLL.43 By 2 hours after seeding on unblocked PLL, HBMECs were partially spread, to an extent intermediate between cells plated on vitronectin and those on PLL/BSA. Following overnight incubation on PLL, spreading was indistinguishable from HBMECs on vitronectin (data not shown). Importantly, on unblocked PLL, untreated HBMECs were mostly protected from apoptosis compared with cells on BSA-blocked PLL/BSA (PLL: 4.7% ± 0.1% vs PLL/BSA: 12.0% ± 0.5%; n = 3, P = .001), similar to the low apoptosis on vitronectin (2.3% ± 0.5%; Figure 1D).
|
v
3/
v
5-integrin inhibition did not require cell detachment.
Taga et al44 previously demonstrated that endothelial apoptosis by RGDfV required presence of vitronectin or fibronectin. This was intriguing, since it suggested that deposition of such matrix proteins on unblocked PLL in our experiment may have provided the protection from apoptosis at baseline, while allowing the subsequent RGDfV-induced apoptosis. Matrix proteins were not provided by the medium, since our experiments were done under serum-free conditions. However, the matrix proteins could have been deposited by the endothelial cells, as previously shown.45-49 Indeed, immunohistochemical staining demonstrated that HBMECs expressed at least 3
v-integrinbinding matrix proteins: fibronectin, vitronectin, and tenascin (Figure 1E). This may explain the difference between spreading on unblocked PLL, where matrix proteins can be efficiently deposited,43 and PLL/BSA, where they cannot.42,43 Since the HBMECs expressed more than one matrix protein, in subsequent experiments, where a defined matrix was required, in order to eliminate contribution of matrix proteins expressed by HBMECs, only vitronectin-coated BSA-blocked dishes were used. Taken together, these data indicate that inhibition of endothelial
v
3/
v
5 integrins is distinct from anoikis in that it does not require cell detachment.
Inhibition of
v
3/
v
5-integrin ligation increases endothelial ceramide even without cell detachment
We have previously shown that ceramide increases in bovine BMECs that lose matrix ligation and undergo anoikis.33 In HBMECs, mean [3H]ceramide in vehicle controltreated cells spread on vitronectin was 0.60% ± 0.05% of total cellular [3H]lipids (mean ± SEM of 27 experiments in triplicate; Figure 2A). Inhibition of integrins
v
3/
v
5 by RGDfV increased [3H]ceramide to 1.17% ± 0.07% of total [3H]lipids (33 experiments in triplicate, P < .001; Figure 2A). In HBMECs treated with the control peptide, RADfV, [3H]ceramide was 0.72% ± 0.05% of [3H]lipids (31 experiments in triplicate). This is only slightly higher than vehicle controltreated cells, indicating the specificity of the inhibition of the arginineglycineaspartic acid sequence in RG-DfV in inducing the ceramide increase. RGDfV-induced ceramide increase was similar in cells that were prelabeled with [3H]palmitic acid for 24 hours and washed prior to addition of peptide and in cells in which isotope was added at the time of plating and was present for the remainder of the experiment (data not shown). Taken together, these data demonstrate that
v
3/
v
5-integrin inhibition by RGDfV increases cellular ceramide in HBMECs.
|
v-integrin ligation by RGDfV was associated with increased endogenous ceramide, and this increase did not require cell detachment from the matrix.
Endogenous ceramide increases
-irradiation and B-cell receptorinduced apoptosis and is required for apoptosis induced by these stress stimuli.26,28,36,50,51 In our cells, exogenously added natural ceramide (C16-ceramide) effectively induced apoptosis (Figure 2F-G), further supporting investigation of its role in integrin-mediated apoptosis.
Inhibition of de novogenerated ceramide does not suppress RGDfV-mediated apoptosis
We next asked whether inhibition of ceramide generation will prevent RGDfV-induced apoptosis. Endogenous ceramide can be generated via several pathways, 2 of which are hydrolysis of sphingomyelin and de novo ceramide synthesis. Both can mediate apoptosis, depending on the apoptotic stimulus.25,26,52 We first examined whether inhibitors of de novo ceramide synthesis could block RGDfV-induced ceramide. Myriocin, an inhibitor of serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT), the rate-limiting enzyme in de novo ceramide synthesis, effectively suppressed the RGDfV-induced ceramide increase starting at 1 nM (Figure 3A black circles). Fumonisin B1 (FB1), another inhibitor of de novo ceramide synthesis (inhibitor of ceramide synthase), also suppressed the RGDfV-induced ceramide increase (Figure 3B). Myriocin and FB1 suppressed the RGDfV-induced ceramide increase equally well whether they were added at the time of addition of [3H]palmitic acid or in prelabeled cells (data not shown). However, neither inhibitor was able to completely decrease RGDfV-induced ceri amide to the levels of ceramide observed in RADfV-treated cells. Interestingly, despite inhibiting the ceramide increase, myriocin was not able to suppress the apoptosis induced by RGDfV, even when used at concentrations of up to 50 µM (Figure 3C and data not shown). Thus, although contributing to the ceramide increase following inhibition of integrins
v
3/
v
5, de novogenerated ceramide was not responsible for mediating the RGDfV-induced endothelial apoptosis.
|
|
v
3/
v
5 decreases cellular sphingomyelin, and RGDfV-induced ceramide increase is suppressed by pharmacologic inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinaseA second pathway for ceramide generation is hydrolysis of sphingomyelin to ceramide and phosphorylcholine. Therefore, we next asked whether sphingomyelin hydrolysis contributed to the increased ceramide following RGDfV treatment. To determine whether RGDfV could induce hydrolysis of sphingomyelin, we prelabeled HBMECs with [3H]palmitic acid to steady state, plated them on vitronectin, incubated them with RGDfV, and measured decay of [3H]sphingomyelin in parallel to the increase in [3H]ceramide, compared with control cells (Figure 4A). Indeed, RGDfV decreased cellular [3H]sphingomyelin from 5.5% ± 0.11% of total [3H]lipids in control cells, to 4.41% ± 0.37% with RGDfV (P = .029; Figure 4A), consistent with sphingomyelin hydrolysis being induced by RGDfV. In the same experiment, total [3H]ceramide content increased from 0.49% ± 0.18% of total [3H]lipids in control cells to 1.23% ± 0.06% with RGDfV (P < .001; Figure 4A), again supporting that the decrease in [3H]sphingomyelin could be, at least partially, accounted for by an increase in [3H]ceramide. To further examine the relationship between sphingomyelin and RGDfV-induced ceramide generation, we investigated the effect of desipramine and imipramine, pharmacologic inhibitors of ASMase, on RGDfV-induced generation of [3H]ceramide. Imipramine and desipramine (5-20 µM) both suppressed RGDfV-induced [3H]ceramide increase in HBMECs (44% and 63% respectively, with 20 µM; Figure 4B and data not shown). These data indicate that generation of ceramide by RGDfV involves ASMase.
|
v-integrin inhibition is inhibited by pharmacologic inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase, but not neutral sphingomyelinase
To determine whether ASMase was required for endothelial apoptosis induced by integrin
v
3/
v
5 inhibition, we examined the effect of ASMase inhibitors on apoptosis of HBMECs plated on vitronectin and treated with RGDfV. As seen previously, RGDfV increased HBMEC apoptosis as measured by flow cytometry of PI-stained cells (Figure 5A-C) and by PARP cleavage (Figure 5D-E). Preincubation with desipramine (5-20 µM) resulted in an effective dose-dependent decrease in RGDfV-induced apoptosis (Figure 5A). Importantly, desipramine was similarly able to decrease apoptosis of HBMECs adherent to PLL/BSA in absence of RGDfV (Figure 5A). Inhibition of RGDfV-induced apoptosis on vitronectin was also achieved with imipramine (5-15 µM; Figure 5B) and with SR33557 (0.5-5 µM; Figure 5C), a different ASMase inhibitor belonging to the indolizin sulfone class. Both imipramine (5-20 µM) and SR33557 (1-5 µM) also decreased RGDfV-induced PARP cleavage, but not the ceramide-independent staurosporine-induced apoptosis (Figure 5D-E). In contrast, 3 inhibitors of neutral sphingomyelinase, GW4869, spiroepoxide, and epoxyquinone,53,54 could not decrease RGDfV-induced apoptosis (data not shown). Taken together, these data suggest a requirement for ASMase in apoptosis induced by
v
3/
v
5-integrin inhibition in endothelial cells.
Inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase prevent detachment and loss of spreading induced by
v
3/
v
5-integrin inhibition
Cell adhesion in the face of lack of integrin
v
3/
v
5 ligation (ie, plating on PLL/BSA, or RGDfV-treated cells on PLL) could not protect HBMECs from apoptosis (Figure 1D). We therefore asked whether suppression of RGDfV-induced apoptosis by ASMase inhibitors will prevent cell detachment from vitronectin, or whether the protected cells would detach from the vitronectin matrix despite remaining viable. We seeded HBMECs on vitronectin, incubated them with ASMase inhibitors, then added RGDfV, and finally, washed off the cells that detached. The number of cells remaining attached to the matrix was assessed by MTT (Figure 6A). As expected, RGDfV induced massive cell detachment compared with vehicle (93.8% ± 0.5% of the cells detached, n = 8; Figure 6A). However, imipramine and SR33557 suppressed this RGDfV-induced detachment, leaving up to 57% and 45% of the cells, respectively, adherent to the plate (Figure 6A). The 3 ASMase inhibitors, SR33557, imipramine, and desipramine, not only suppressed cell detachment, but also maintained partial cell spreading on the vitronectin (Figure 6B and data not shown), suggesting that their action is upstream of the RGDfV-induced morphologic changes in HBMECs. Since caspase inhibitors effectively prevented RGDfV-induced apoptosis, we tested whether they would also prevent HBMEC detachment from the matrix (Figure 6C-D). Interestingly, the pan-caspase inhibitor, Z-VAD-FMK, which effectively protected HBMECs from RGDfV-induced apoptosis, was able to suppress RGDfV-induced detachment similar to the protection afforded by the ASMase inhibitors (Figure 6C-D; between 47.4%-87.8% of the protection conferred by the ASMase inhibitors in 3 different experiments). However, BOC-D-FMK (pan-caspase inhibitor) and Z-DEVD-FMK (caspase-3 inhibitor), which also protected from RGDfV-induced apoptosis, were unable to prevent RGDfV-induced cell detachment (Figure 6C). On PLL/BSA, cells remained attached in presence of each of these inhibitors, both in presence or absence of RGDfV (data not shown). These data suggest that the molecular ordering of ASMase and caspases in integrin
v
3/
v
5 inhibition is complex, and that ASMase and ceramide increase may be upstream of the morphologic change induced by inhibition of integrins
v
3/
v
5.
Taken together, our data demonstrate that both RGDfV-induced ceramide increase and RGDfV-induced apoptosis of HBMECs could be suppressed with ASMase inhibitors, suggesting that ASMase and ceramide are causally involved in endothelial apoptosis induced by inhibition of integrins
v
3 and
v
5.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
v
3/
v
5-integrinmediated apoptosis. Our data demonstrate that RGDfV increased ceramide and decreased sphingomyelin, and that inhibitors of ASMase inhibited RGDfV-induced ceramide increase, cell detachment, and apoptosis. Taken together, this suggests that ceramide and ASMase mediate endothelial apoptosis induced by RGDfV (Figure 7).
We have previously shown that endothelial cell detachment due to RGDfV, the
v-integrin function-blocking peptide, was associated with increase in the proapoptotic lipid second messenger, ceramide.33 While ceramide generation has been shown to regulate apoptosis by stress stimuli such as irradiation, Fas, and lipopolysaccharide,26,56,57 neither ceramide nor its metabolites have previously been implicated in integrin signaling. In our experiments, both inhibitors of de novo ceramide synthesis and ASMase each partially inhibited the RGDfV-induced ceramide increase (Figures 3, 4). This suggests that RGDfV can induce ceramide generation via more than one biosynthetic pathway, similar to TNF
-induced ceramide generation and apoptosis in the MCF7 breast cancer and L929 murine fibrosarcoma cell lines.58 Since only inhibitors of ASMase, but not inhibitors of de novo ceramide synthesis, prevented RGDfV-induced apoptosis (Figures 3C and 5), this suggests that only the sphingomyelin-derived ceramide is associated with integrin regulation of survival/apoptosis. It may also be that ceramide synthesized by specific stimuli resides in more than one subcellular pool, thus compartmentalizing its effects,59 or that parallel death pathways are induced downstream of integrin ligation. It is not likely that sphingosine-1-phosphate degradation by sphingosine-1-phosphate phosphatase60 contributed to the RGDfV-induced ceramide increase, since fumonisin B1 and myriocin were similarly effective in suppressing the ceramide increase. Last, as suggested for some stress stimuli,59,61 based on our data, it is not possible to determine whether it is the increase in ceramide, the decrease in sphingomyelin, or an altogether different metabolite of these lipid pathways that functions in the RGDfV-induced apoptosis. In this respect, it would be interesting to determine the identity of the faster-migrating [3H]lipid on the TLC plate (top of plate, Figure 2C), which also increases with RGDfV, and to analyze the RGDfV-induced cellular lipids by mass spectroscopy, to determine which other lipids are affected by RGDfV.
|
|