Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 1 February 2005, Vol. 105, No. 3, pp. 1365-1366.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chiba, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chiba, S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

CORRESPONDENCE

To the editor:

SCL/Tal1 and lymphoid versus myeloid lineage assignment

In their recent paper, Kunisato et al1 describe the role of stem cell leukemia gene (SCL) in regulating lineage fate in hematopoietic stem cells. Their experiments involve retroviral expression of SCL and a "dominant-negative" mutant of SCL (DN-SCL) in hematopoietic stem cells and their progeny. They propose that levels of SCL regulate lineage commitment: enforced expression of SCL favored myeloid differentiation, while expression of the DN-SCL favored lymphoid differentiation. We query the interpretation of the results obtained with the DN-SCL mutant, as its design and effects are not suggestive of a specific dominant-negative function. The authors cite Aplan et al2 and Krosl et al3 for the design of the dominant-negative SCL. In these papers the basic domain of SCL was deleted. This mutant is unable to bind to DNA, however, heterodimerization with E2A proteins remains intact through the presence of the helix-loop-helix (HLH) domain. The DN-SCL mutant used by Kunisato et al1 lacks both the basic and HLH domains. Such a mutant would be predicted to abrogate not only DNA binding, but also the ability to interact with E2A proteins. The remaining N- and C-terminal portions of SCL have no known function—indeed, a truncation mutant comprising only the basic and HLH domains could rescue hematopoiesis of SCL-null embryonic stem cells,4 suggesting that the N- and C-terminal amino acids are not essential. Since a dominant-negative mutant usually relies on deletion of specific functional domains while retaining vital protein interactions, it is difficult to understand how this mutant could act as a dominant negative. Moreover, enforced expression of the DN-SCL only mildly affects erythroid cell production in vitro or in vivo (Figures 3 and 7), whereas loss of SCL by conditional deletion has demonstrated that SCL is essential for erythroid burst-forming units (BFU-E) and production of red cells in vivo.5-7 Thus, there is no available data to positively suggest that the DN-SCL used by Kunisato and colleagues1 inhibits the function of SCL. Nonetheless, it is possible that the N- and C-terminal portions of SCL have an unknown function that causes the observed effects on lineage specification. However, without the correct controls, such as rescue of the DN-SCL effect with wild-type SCL, it is impossible to discriminate specific from nonspecific effects. In light of this and since the effects on myeloid and lymphoid lineage output are subtle and transient, it is important to regard with caution the assertion that the effects are due to a dominant-negative effect on SCL.

Mark Hall, and David Curtis

Correspondence: Mark Hall, Rotary Bone Marrow Research Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia; e-mail: hall{at}wehi.edu.au.

References

  1. Kunisato A, Chiba S, Saito T, et al. Stem cell leukemia protein directs hematopoietic stem cell fate. Blood. 2004;103: 3336-3341.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Aplan PD, Nakahara K, Orkin SH, Kirsch IR. The SCL gene product: a positive regulator of erythroid differentiation. EMBO J. 1992;11: 4073-4081.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  3. Krosl G, He G, Lefrancois M, et al. Transcription factor SCL is required for c-kit expression and c-Kit function in hemopoietic cells. J Exp Med. 1998;188: 439-450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Porcher C, Liao EC, Fujiwara Y, Zon LI, Orkin SH. Specification of hematopoietic and vascular development by the bHLH transcription factor SCL without direct DNA binding. Development. 1999;126: 4603-4615.[Abstract]

  5. Mikkola HK, Klintman J, Yang H, et al. Haematopoietic stem cells retain long-term repopulating activity and multipotency in the absence of stem-cell leukaemia SCL/tal-1 gene. Nature. 2003;421: 547-551.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  6. Hall MA, Curtis DJ, Metcalf D, et al. The critical regulator of embryonic hematopoiesis, SCL, is vital in the adult for megakaryopoiesis, erythropoiesis, and lineage choice in CFU-S12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100: 992-997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Curtis DJ, Hall MA, Van Stekelenburg LJ, Robb L, Jane SM, Begley CG. SCL is required for normal function of short-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 2004;103: 3342-3348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


 

Response:

Dominant-negative activity of stem cell leukemia (SCL) lacking bHLH domain

Queries from Hall and Curtis on our paper1 in Blood include some important issues. As they argue, the construct of interest ({Delta}bHLH SCL) may not have an ability to interact with E2A proteins. Indeed, our experiment showed that it does not interact with wild-type (WT) stem cell leukemia (SCL) (data not shown). However, this does not imply that {Delta}bHLH SCL consisting only of the N- and C-terminal portions of SCL does not have any function. Contrary to the argument by Porcher et al,2 their results could indicate that the N- and C-terminal portions of SCL have some roles, since it appears that the bHLH domain alone does not completely rescue the SCL-null phenotype. In addition, as was described in our paper (Figure 7), we found maturation arrest in the erythroid progenitors by introducing {Delta}bHLH SCL. This observation is considered to be biologic evidence of dominant-negative effect of {Delta}bHLH SCL on wild-type SCL, given the phenotype of SCL conditional knockout mice.3 In this regard, we are afraid that the questioners may misunderstand our description in the paper.

To explore the proteins that interact with {Delta}bHLH SCL, we have performed a coprecipitation analysis (Figure 1). We transfected HEK293 peak cells with plasmids containing FLAG-tagged WT SCL and {Delta}bHLH SCL under the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter. Two days after the transfection, lysates were prepared and immunoprecipitated with the anti-FLAG antibody-coated beads (Sigma, St Louis, MO). The samples then were resolved through sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and the gel was silver-stained (Dai-ichi Kagaku, Tokyo, Japan). We found that some proteins coprecipitated commonly with WT SCL and {Delta}bHLH SCL (solid arrows), and others coprecipitated with WT SCL alone (dotted arrows). It is possible that the commonly precipitated proteins interact with the N- or C-terminal region of SCL, and thus, it is speculated that {Delta}bHLH SCL functions against WT SCL through the competition for binding to these proteins. To further explore the underlying biochemical mechanisms, we have sequenced some of these coprecipitated proteins, which we hope will be reported in the near future.



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.. Proteins co-precipitated with WTSCL or {Delta}bHLH SCL. WT SCL and {Delta}bHLH SCL are indicated by asterisks. The bands indicated by arrows are reproducibly precipitated.

 

We disagree with the comment by the questioners that we should be able to show the rescue of the effect of {Delta}bHLH SCL with WT SCL. This is not an appropriate experiment to show the dominant-negative effect of {Delta}bHLH SCL.

Although the biochemical mechanisms need to be further disclosed, clear are our findings on the distinct biologic functions of WT SCL and {Delta}bHLH SCL on the commitment fate determination of hematopoietic stem cells. We hope that our ongoing study will give a clear answer to the mechanisms for how {Delta}bHLH SCL functions in a dominant-negative fashion against WT SCL.

Atsushi Kunisato, Seishi Ogawa, and Shigeru Chiba

Correspondence: Shigeru Chiba, Department of Cell Therapy and Transplantation Medicine, University of Tokyo Hospital 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo; e-mail: schiba-tky{at}umin.ac.jp.

References

  1. Kunisato A, Chiba S, Saito T, et al. Stem cell leukemia protein directs hematopoietic stem cell fate. Blood. 2004;103: 3336-3341.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Porcher C, Liao EC, Fujiwara Y, Zon LI, Orkin SH. Specification of hematopoietic and vascular development by the bHLH transcription factor SCL without direct DNA binding. Development. 1999;126: 4603-4615.[Abstract]

  3. Mikkola HK, Klintman J, Yang H, et al. Haematopoietic stem cells retain long-term repopulating activity and multipotency in the absence of stem-cell leukaemia SCL/tal-1 gene. Nature. 2003;421: 547-551.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Stem cell leukemia protein directs hematopoietic stem cell fate
Atsushi Kunisato, Shigeru Chiba, Toshiki Saito, Keiki Kumano, Etsuko Nakagami-Yamaguchi, Tomoyuki Yamaguchi, and Hisamaru Hirai
Blood 2004 103: 3336-3341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chiba, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chiba, S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020