Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 1 February 2005, Vol. 105, No. 3, pp. 1367-1368.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pallis, M.
Right arrow Articles by Burnett, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pallis, M.
Right arrow Articles by Burnett, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

CORRESPONDENCE

To the editor:

Reproducible measurements of AML blast p-glycoprotein function in 2 center analyses

The review article "Targeting the Multidrug Resistance-1 Transporter in AML" by Mahadevan and List1 is thorough and thought-provoking, and we support its principal conclusions that pglycoprotein (pgp) remains one of the most powerful prognostic factors in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and that future trials of pgp modulators are called for. Since the preselection of patients with pgp-positive AML would target those who are most likely to benefit and would also improve the predictive power of modulator trials, it follows that pgp phenotyping should be carried out at diagnosis. However, Mahadevan and List were unable to indicate a suitable method for pgp measurement in the laboratory. They referred right back to the consensus recommendations of 19962 and to the French report of 1997,3 both of which highlighted discrepancies in methodology and analysis. Meanwhile, Broxterman and colleagues4 published a report of a flow cytometric assay of functional pgp, which was reproducible in 2 centers in The Netherlands. In the United Kingdom, where pgp is being measured on AML trial patients in more than one laboratory, we built on the lessons of the Dutch and the French groups and decided to use a single standard operating procedure at participating laboratories. The Dutch protocol was adopted with the minor modification of adding CD45 staining to identify blasts.5,6

Most samples were sent to one of 2 centers, Cardiff or Nottingham. Thirteen quality control samples have been shared between the 2 centers since our collaboration started in 1999. Discordant results were noted in 1 of 13 samples; 8 had negative or low values (less than 1.7), 2 had intermediate values (1.7-3.39), and 2 had high values (3.4). Furthermore, there was a remarkable similarity in the distributions of data. Figure 1 illustrates the distributions obtained on 120 samples, the first 60 analyzed at each center. At one stage in the trial a third center also participated in the functional pgp analysis. A Kolmogoroff-Smirnoff test showed no significant difference in the distribution of PSC-833 modulation ratios at each of the 3 centers.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.. Distributions of PSC 833 modulation ratios analyzed in 2 centers.

 

In contrast to the functional assays, antibody assays using MRK-16, also performed according to a standard operating procedure, showed significant differences in distribution between the 3 centers. While Mahadevan and List rightly pointed out that functional assays do not yield greater prognostic significance than antibody measurement in clinical trials, we have found that an important advantage of the functional assay lies in its greater sensitivity and reproducibility. We acknowledge that discrepancies do occur between phenotypic and functional pgp results, which are not fully understood.7,8 However, in the United Kingdom LRF AML 14 trial, an additional advantage of using a pgp functional assay was that the agent being used in the trial, PSC-833, could also be used in the assay.

Using the Dutch protocol over several years has confirmed to us that this methodology is robust and could now be passed to the safe and reliable hands of hospital immunophenotyping laboratories. From receiving a marrow sample, the assay takes about 4 hours and has been undertaken with as few as 3 x 106 cells. Using this protocol, future trial organizers can have the choice of whether to give pgp modulators to an unsorted cohort or to pgp-positive patients only.

Acknowledgements

These studies were funded by the Leukaemia Research Fund. We acknowledge the support of the NCRN Leukaemia Working Party.

Monica Pallis, Janet Fisher, Louise Truran, Martin Grundy, Nigel Russell, and Alan Burnett

Correspondence: Monica Pallis, Academic Haematology, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK; e-mail: monica.pallis{at}nottingham.ac.uk

References

  1. Mahadevan D, List A. Targeting the multidrug resistance-1 transporter in AML. Blood. 2004;104: 1940-1951.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Beck WT, Grogan TM, Willman CL, et al. Methods to detect p-glycoprotein–associated multidrug resistance in patients, tumors—consensus recommendations. Cancer Res. 1996;56: 3010-3020.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Marie JP, Huet S, Faussat AM, et al. Multicentric evaluation of the MDR phenotype in leukemia. Leukemia. 1997;11: 1086-1094.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. Broxterman HJ, Sonneveld P, Feller N, et al. Quality control of multidrug resistance assays in adult acute leukaemia: correlation between assays for P-glycoprotein expression and activity. Blood. 1996;87: 4809-4816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Hunter H, Pallis M, Seedhouse C, Grundy M, Grey C, Russell N. The expression of p-glycoprotein in AML cells with FLT3 internal tandem duplications is associated with reduced apoptosis in response to FLT3 inhibitors. Br J Haematol. 2004;127: 26-33.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  6. Pallis M, Das-Gupta E. The flow cytometric measurement of functional and phenotypic p-glycoprotein. In: Blumenthal DR, ed. Chemosensitivity: Methods and Protocols. Humana Press, Torowa, NJ. In press.

  7. Leith CP, Chen IM, Kopecky KJ, et al. Correlation of multidrug resistance (MDR-1) protein expression with functional dye/drug efflux in acute myeloid leukemia by multiparameter flow cytometry: identification of discordant MDR1-/efflux+ and MDR1+/effluxcases. Blood. 1995;86: 2329-2342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  8. Legrand O, Zompi S, Perrot JY, et al. P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance associated protein-1 activity in 132 acute myeloid leukemias according to FAB subtypes and cytogenetics risk groups. Haematologica. 2004;89: 34-41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. H. Seedhouse, M. Grundy, P. White, Y. Li, J. Fisher, D. Yakunina, A. V. Moorman, T. Hoy, N. Russell, A. Burnett, et al.
Sequential Influences of Leukemia-Specific and Genetic Factors on P-Glycoprotein Expression in Blasts from 817 Patients Entered into the National Cancer Research Network Acute Myeloid Leukemia 14 and 15 Trials
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2007; 13(23): 7059 - 7066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pallis, M.
Right arrow Articles by Burnett, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pallis, M.
Right arrow Articles by Burnett, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020