Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 November 2005, Vol. 106, No. 10, pp. 3646-3649.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on August 11, 2005; DOI 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4603.


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figure
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2004-12-4603v1
106/10/3646    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reyes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reyes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, J. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells
Right arrow Transplantation
Right arrow Stem Cells in Hematology
Right arrow Brief Reports
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

STEM CELLS IN HEMATOLOGY
Brief report

Donor origin of multipotent adult progenitor cells in radiation chimeras

Morayma Reyes, Sheng Li, Jessica Foraker, En Kimura, and Jeffrey S. Chamberlain

From the Departments of Neurology, Pathology, Biochemistry, and Medicine, and the Muscular Dystrophy Cooperative Research Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 
Multipotent adult progenitor cells (MAPCs) are bone marrow-derived stem cells that have extensive in vitro expansion capacity and can differentiate in vivo and in vitro into tissue cells of all 3 germinal layers: ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. The origin of MAPCs within bone marrow is unknown. MAPCs are believed to be derived from the bone marrow stroma compartment as they are isolated within the adherent cell component. Numerous studies of bone marrow chimeras in the human and the mouse point to a host origin of bone marrow stromal cells. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which coexist with stromal cells, have also been proven to be of host origin after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in numerous studies. We report here that following syngeneic bone marrow transplants into lethally irradiated C57BL6 mice, MAPCs are of donor origin.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 
Stromal cells constitute the cell population that supports the hematopoietic system. They play a key role in the maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) by modulating their self-renewal, proliferation, commitment, maturation, and apoptosis.1 Stromal cells are defined in vitro as the adherent cell component that supports hematopoietic cells in long-term cultures. This population is very heterogonous and includes adipocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, osteoblasts, and osteocytes.1-4

Because of the close relationship between the stroma and the hematopoietic compartments, the idea of a common precursor has been contemplated for more than half a century. However, numerous studies of bone marrow (BM) chimeras demonstrate that BM stromal cells, including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), are host derived after BM transplantation.1,4-10

Multipotent adult progenitor cells (MAPCs) are stem cells obtained from BM that can differentiate into mesodermal (eg, osteoblast, chondrocytes, adipocytes, myoblasts, and endothelial cells), endodermal (eg, hepatocytes), and ectodermal (eg, neurons, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes) cells.11-15 MAPCs are isolated within the BM adherent cell component, but their origin is still unknown.

MAPCs have extensive expansion capacity in vitro, are easily transduced, and can differentiate both in vitro and in vivo into cells of the 3 germinal layers; thus, MAPCs hold great promise for cell therapy. Here we studied if MAPCs are transplantable within unfractionated BM transplants into irradiated recipients. Two million mononuclear BM cells from green fluorescent protein (GFP) congenic mice were transplanted into lethally irradiated mice. BM cells from chimeras were analyzed 1, 2, and 3 months after transplant and MAPCs were isolated. Surprisingly, we consistently found that chimeric BM contained both host- and donor-derived MAPCs.


    Study design
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 
BM transplants

Transplants were performed as described previously.16 Briefly, 2 million BM mononuclear cells from 4-week-old GFP transgenic mice17 were injected via tail vein into lethally irradiated (11 Gy) syngeneic C57BL6 mice (4 to 6 weeks old).

MAPC culture and differentiation

MAPCs were isolated from the BM of C57BL6 mice and expanded in culture as described previously.12 MAPCs were expanded in serum-free (SF) medium, (60% low-glucose Dulbecco modified Eagle medium [DMEM-LG]; 40% MCDB-201 (a modification of Ham nutrient mixture F-12); insulin, transferrin, and selenic acid [ITS]; linoleic acid [LA]-bovine serum albumin [BSA]; 10 nM dexamethasone; 0.1 µM ascorbic acid 2-phosphate; 100 U penicillin; and 1000 U streptomycin) with 2% fetal calf serum (Hyclone Laboratories, Logan, UT), 10 ng/mL human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (hPDGF-BB; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), 10 ng/mL mouse epidermal growth factor (mEGF; Sigma, Saint Louis, MO), and 1000 U/mL mouse leukemia inhibitory factor (mLIF; Chemicon, Temecula, CA). Differentiation medium contained SF supplemented with respective growth factors.

Endothelial, neuronal, and hepatocyte differentiation were induced with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) plus fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF4; all purchased from R&D Systems), respectively, as described.11,12,15

Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence analysis

Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence were performed as described previously.11,12 Antibodies against CD73-phycoerythrin (PE), CD45-PE, CD14-PE, CD44-PE, Flk-1-PE (VEGF-R2), Sca-1-PE, and CD13-PE were from BD Pharmingen (San Diego, CA). Antibody against von Willebrand factor (VWF) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Antibody against neurofilament 200 (NF-200), smooth muscle actin-Cy-3, and albumin were from Sigma. Antibody against CD105 was from eBiosciences (San Diego, CA). Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde or methanol, and incubated sequentially for 30 minutes each with primary and secondary antibodies. Immunofluorescence staining was analyzed with a Nikon Eclipse E-1000 fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), using a Plan Apochromat 20 x/0.75 numeric aperture objective (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY). Images were captured with a SPOT 1.4.0 camera and SPOT Advanced 3.5.8 acquisition software (both from Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI).

Karyotypes

For karyotyping, 50% confluent cultures were exposed to 0.1 µg/mL colcemid (Sigma) for 12 hours, harvested, washed, and exposed to 75 mM KCl hypotonic solution for 5 minutes. Hypotonic solution was washed out by centrifugation and cells were fixed in 5 mL methanol/acetic acid (3:1) fixative. Fixed cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in 0.5 mL methanol/acetic acid (3:1) fixative. Cells were dropped onto a hot glass slide. Chromosomes were stained using 10% Giemsa solution. Twenty chromosomal spreads were read per population to rule out mosaicisms more than 14% with a confidence interval of 95%.

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)

Cells were fixed onto slides as per the karyotype protocol specified in "Karyotypes," followed by dehydration with serial ethanol washes and denaturation with a 70% formamide and 30% 2x standard saline citrate (SSC) solution. Nuclei were stained with a whole mouse Y chromosome fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) probe (purchased from Cambio, Cambs, United Kingdom) overnight, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and coverslipped with DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) mounting medium.


    Results and discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 
Mouse BM MAPCs were isolated by adhesion of unfractionated BM mononuclear cells to a Petri dish, followed by removal of nonadherent cells after 24 hours. In early cultures, MAPCs coexisted with other types of adherent cells including stromal cells, macrophages, and endothelial cells. When MAPCs were isolated from BM chimeras (n = 12, 4 to 12 weeks after syngeneic BM transplant from a transgenic mouse ubiquitously expressing GFP under the control of the constitutively active cytomegalovirus [CMV]/{beta}-actin promoter), a mixture of large and small GFP-positive and GFP-negative cells were seen (Figure 1A-C). After 3 weeks, colonies of small cells resembling MAPCs emerged adjacent to larger cells (Figure 1C).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.. Mononuclear cells from BM chimeras were replated in MAPC medium at a density of 106 cells/cm2. (A) After 1 week, large GFP-negative cells (arrows) and small GFP-positive and GFP-negative cells were seen. (B) After 2 weeks, colonies of the small GFP-positive cells began to be observed adjacent to larger cells. (C) After 3 weeks, colonies of small, MAPC-like cells were seen (arrowheads). (D) Staining for CD73-PE, a marker for mesenchymal cells. (E) Staining for smooth muscle actin-Cy-3, which is a marker for activated stromal cells. (F) Staining for CD14-PE, a marker for macrophages. Notice the presence of small GFP-positive spindle-shaped cells that resemble MAPCs, which were negative for the above markers. (G) MAPC colony seen after 5 weeks. (H) MAPC immunophenotype: negative for CD45, CD105, CD44, CD73, but positive for Flk-1, Sca-1, CD13. Original magnification, x20 for panels A-G. Arrowheads indicate MAPC-like cells; arrows, large GFP-negative cells.

 
These colonies were composed of GFP-positive and GFP-negative cells. Some of the medium-sized cells stained positive for CD73 (Figure 1D) and other MSC markers (not shown). Other medium-sized cells stained positive for smooth muscle actin (Figure 1E), which is a marker for activated stromal cells. These medium-sized cells were always GFP negative, indicating that stromal cells and MSCs were of host origin in our culture system from BM chimeras. The largest cells, which contained both GFP-positive and -negative cells, were identified as macrophages as they stained positive for CD45, a pan-hematopoietic marker (not shown), and CD14 (Figure 1F), a macrophage-specific marker. After 5 weeks of culture, MAPCs outgrew the stromal cells (including MSCs and macrophages) emerging as colonies of homogeneous cells, some of which were 100% GFP positive (Figure 1G).

Interestingly, an increased percentage of GFP-positive MAPCs was seen in cultures derived from mice at longer intervals after transplant, suggesting that the BM cells responsible for the generation of MAPCs when cultured in vitro may be susceptible to irradiation (Table 1, Figure 1). After 30 cell doublings, these cells displayed the classic phenotype of MAPCs, as they did not display immunoreactivity for CD45 or MSC markers, such as CD105, CD44, or CD73, but they stained positive for FLK-1 (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 [VEGFR2]), Sca-1, and CD13 (Figure 1H).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.. Percentage of successful MAPC cultures obtained from primary and secondary BM recipients and age-matched controls

 
In a second experiment, BM obtained 1 month after BM transplant (n = 3) was harvested and mononuclear cells were sorted as GFP-positive and GFP-negative cells and were cultured in MAPC expansion medium. MAPCs grew from the GFP-positive fraction. These GFP-positive cells displayed the typical MAPC-like immunophenotypes and were expanded for more than 50 cell doublings and differentiated into endothelial cells, hepatocytes, and neurons (Figure 2A-I). Karyotypic analysis performed on randomly selected clones (n = 5) that were expanded for more than 50 cell doublings revealed diploid karyotypes (Figure 2J). Although stromal cells and MSCs were seen in the early cultures of the GFP-negative fraction, no MAPCs grew out of this population.

MAPCs may require support or assistance from other types of hematopietic cells in early culture, which were absent in the GFP-negative population. This possibility might explain why mouse MAPCs cannot be expanded if the mononuclear cells are depleted of CD45-positive cells, in contrast to human MAPC isolation, which requires upfront depletion of CD45-positive cells.14

To rule out the possibility that MAPCs are the product of cell fusion between a host and a donor cell either in vivo or in our in vitro culture conditions, we performed sex-mismatched transplants of female GFP donor BM cells into a male host. In this setting, if fusion occurs we should find Y chromosome-positive cells in the donor population even if reduction from a tetraploid cell to a triploid or diploid cell occurred. If fusion did not occur, no Y chromosome-positive cells would be present in the donor population.



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.. MAPCs derived from sorted GFP-positive BM mononuclear cells were cultured for more than 50 cell doublings, then induced to differentiate into endothelial cells (mesodermal lineage), hepatocytes (endodermal lineage), or neurons (ectodermal lineage). (A,D,G) GFP-positive MAPCs treated with VEGF (A-C; notice vascular tubelike structures), FGF-4/HGF (D-F), or bFGF (G-I) for 14 days. Cultures were stained with anti-VWF labeled with Cy3 (B), anti-albumin-Cy3 (E), or anti-NF200-Cy3 (H). (C,F,I) An overlay of Cy3 staining with green fluorescence and DAPI. (A,C,D,F, G,I) 100% of these cells were eGFP positive. (J) Cytogentic analysis of selected clones revealed a diploid karyotype. (K) BM from secondary recipients showed trilineage hematopoietic differentiation (% GFP-positive cells determined by FACS). (L) MAPCs from secondary recipients contained GFP-positive cells. Inset: Binucleated cells. Bar equals 200 µm.

 
BM from 5 chimeras were harvested 4 weeks after transplant and MAPC cultures were established from either fresh BM sorted as GFP-positive cells or unsorted BM cells. After 5 weeks, colonies of MAPCs were seen. Those derived from the sorted GFP-positive fraction were prepared for karyotyping and Y chromosome FISH analysis. Cytogenetic analysis of the GFP-positive cells revealed a diploid female karyoptype (40, XX). MAPC colonies derived from unsorted BM cells were then sorted as GFP positive and GFP negative and analyzed for the presence of the Y chromosome by FISH analysis. We analyzed more than 1 million cells per population by FISH in 5 different chimeras. As expected, all GFP-negative (host cells) contained the Y chromosome, whereas all GFP-positive cells (donor cells) were negative for the Y chromosome by FISH (Supplemental Figure S1, available at the Blood website; click on the Supplemental Figure link at the top of the online article). This result proves that MAPCs are not derived from an in vitro or in vivo fusion event.

In a third study, BM mononuclear cells from mice that had been previously undergone BM transplantation with syngeneic GFP-positive donors (n = 3) were transplanted into a second set of syngeneic recipients (n = 9). Two months after the second transplant, BM was harvested and mononuclear cells were cultured in MAPC medium. The secondary recipients showed multilineage engraftment, as GFP-positive cells were present in all 3 hematopoietic lineages (Figure 2K). Interestingly, the MAPC population isolated from the secondary recipients also contained GFP-positive cells (Table 1, Figure 2L).

The frequency of successful MAPC cultures from transplant recipients is very similar to the frequency obtained from previous MAPC isolations of age-matched, nonirradiated, nontransplanted mice, indicating that the capacity to generate MAPC cultures is age-dependent and dramatically decreases with increasing age (Table 1). Thus, we demonstrated that MAPCs were transplantable within unfractionated BM transplants, and were able to engraft, self-renew, and repopulate secondary recipients.

This study is the first demonstration that ex vivo-cultured MAPCs are physiologically different from stromal cells and MSCs, suggesting they may be unrelated ontologically, even though they all form part of the BM adherent cell component defined in culture. This is also the first demonstration that BM transplantation leads to the transfer of cells, that upon isolation in vitro generate MAPCs and, whatever the identity of this cell, is eliminated by irradiation.

Numerous studies indicate that hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), or BM populations highly enriched for HSCs, can give rise to nonhematopoietic cells, particularly vascular cells, including endothelial and smooth muscle cells.18-21 Additional studies from single HSC transplants may help to elucidate whether MAPCs and HSCs have a common origin.

Studies by Jiang et al12 demonstrated that when in vitro-cultured MAPCs were intravenously transplanted into nonobese diabetic-severe combined immunodeficient mice, engraftment was observed in multiple tissues, including hematopoietic cells.

When BM cells from these initial recipients were transplanted into secondary recipients, similar engraftment in multiple tissues was observed. However, in these studies MAPCs were not isolated for culturing in vitro from either the primary or secondary recipients, so it could not be determined whether MAPCs engrafted and/or self-renewed, or whether they instead differentiated into progenitor cells that were responsible for the observed engraftment. Here we show that following unfractionated BM cell transplant, MAPCs or the cell type that generates MAPCs when cultured in vitro, exists in the mononuclear BM fraction in sufficient quantities to be transplantable (MAPCs are donor derived in BM chimeras), enabling self-renewal (both in vitro and in vivo) and repopulation in secondary recipients. Whether MAPCs are involved in the plasticity phenomena seen following BM transplants remains to be determined.22-25 Nonetheless, this finding has many implications for the use of BM transplants to deliver and reconstitute the MAPC population, which in turn could be of potential use for many clinical applications.


    Footnotes
 
Submitted December 3, 2004; accepted July 23, 2005.

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, August 11, 2005; DOI 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4603.

Supported by the National Institutes of Health and the Muscular Dystrophy Association.

The online version of the article contains a data supplement.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

Reprints: Jeffrey S. Chamberlain, Department of Neurology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195-7720; e-mail: jsc5{at}u.washington.edu.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 

  1. Bianco P, Riminucci M, Gronthos S, Robey PG. Bone marrow stromal stem cells: nature, biology, and potential applications. Stem Cells. 2001;19: 180-192.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  2. Dennis JE, Charbord P. Origin and differentiation of human and murine stroma. Stem Cells. 2002;20: 205-214.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  3. Bianco P, Riminucci M, Kuznetsov S, Robey PG. Multipotential cells in the bone marrow stroma: regulation in the context of organ physiology. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 1999;9: 159-173.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. Krebsbach PH, Kuznetsov SA, Bianco P, Robey PG. Bone marrow stromal cells: characterization and clinical application. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1999;10: 165-181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Simmons PJ, Przepiorka D, Thomas ED, Torok-Storb B. Host origin of marrow stromal cells following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Nature. 1987;328: 429-432.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  6. Stute N, Fehse B, Schroder J, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells are not of donor origin in patients with severe aplastic anemia who underwent sex-mismatched allogeneic bone marrow transplant. J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2002;11: 977-984.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  7. Hongeng S, Petvises S, Rerkamnuaychoke B, et al. Host origin of marrow mesenchymal stem cells following allogeneic cord-blood stem-cell transplantation. Int J Hematol. 2001;74: 235-236.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  8. Koc ON, Peters C, Aubourg P, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells remain host-derived despite successful hematopoietic engraftment after allogeneic transplantation in patients with lysosomal and peroxisomal storage diseases. Exp Hematol. 1999;27: 1675-1681.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  9. Zhang W, Knieling G, Vohwinkel G, et al. Origin of stroma cells in long-term bone marrow cultures from patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Hematol. 1999;78: 305-314.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  10. Awaya N, Rupert K, Bryant E, Torok-Storb B. Failure of adult marrow-derived stem cells to generate marrow stroma after successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Exp Hematol. 2002;30: 937-942.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  11. Jiang Y, Vaessen B, Lenvik T, Blackstad M, Reyes M, Verfaillie CM. Multipotent progenitor cells can be isolated from postnatal murine bone marrow, muscle, and brain. Exp Hematol. 2002;30: 896-904.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  12. Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL, et al. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature. 2002;418: 41-49.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  13. Jiang Y, Henderson D, Blackstad M, Chen A, Miller RF, Verfaillie CM. Neuroectodermal differentiation from mouse multipotent adult progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(suppl 1): 11854-11860.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  14. Reyes M, Verfaillie CM. Characterization of multipotent adult progenitor cells, a subpopulation of mesenchymal stem cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;938: 231-233; discussion 233-235.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  15. Reyes M, Dudek A, Jahagirdar B, Koodie L, Marker PH, Verfaillie CM. Origin of endothelial progenitors in human postnatal bone marrow. J Clin Invest. 2002;109: 337-346.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  16. LaBarge MA, Blau HM. Biological progression from adult bone marrow to mononucleate muscle stem cell to multinucleate muscle fiber in response to injury. Cell. 2002;111: 589-601.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  17. Okabe M, Ikawa M, Kominami K, Nakanishi T, Nishimune Y. `Green mice' as a source of ubiquitous green cells. FEBS Lett. 1997;407: 313-319.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  18. Jackson KA, Majka SM, Wang H, et al. Regeneration of ischemic cardiac muscle and vascular endothelium by adult stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2001;107: 1395-1402.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  19. Sata M. Circulating vascular progenitor cells contribute to vascular repair, remodeling, and lesion formation. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2003;13: 249-253.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  20. Bittmann I, Hentrich M, Bise K, Kolb HJ, Lohrs U. Endothelial cells but not epithelial cells or cardiomyocytes are partially replaced by donor cells after allogeneic bone marrow and stem cell transplantation. J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2003;12: 359-366.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  21. Carmeliet P, Luttun A. The emerging role of the bone marrow-derived stem cells in (therapeutic) angiogenesis. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86: 289-297.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  22. Mezey E, Chandross KJ, Harta G, Maki RA, McKercher SR. Turning blood into brain: cells bearing neuronal antigens generated in vivo from bone marrow. Science. 2000;290: 1779-1782.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  23. Krause DS, Theise ND, Collector MI, et al. Multiorgan, multi-lineage engraftment by a single bone marrow-derived stem cell. Cell. 2001;105: 369-377.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  24. Ferrari G, Cusella-De Angelis G, Coletta M, et al. Muscle regeneration by bone marrow-derived myogenic progenitors. Science. 1998;279: 1528-1530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  25. Brazelton TR, Rossi FM, Keshet GI, Blau HM. From marrow to brain: expression of neuronal phenotypes in adult mice. Science. 2000;290: 1775-1779.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
D. Sun, C. O. Martinez, O. Ochoa, L. Ruiz-Willhite, J. R. Bonilla, V. E. Centonze, L. L. Waite, J. E. Michalek, L. M. McManus, and P. K. Shireman
Bone marrow-derived cell regulation of skeletal muscle regeneration
FASEB J, February 1, 2009; 23(2): 382 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
haematolHome page
M. Shi, J. Li, L. Liao, B. Chen, B. Li, L. Chen, H. Jia, and R. C. Zhao
Regulation of CXCR4 expression in human mesenchymal stem cells by cytokine treatment: role in homing efficiency in NOD/SCID mice
Haematologica, July 1, 2007; 92(7): 897 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
M. Serafini, S. J. Dylla, M. Oki, Y. Heremans, J. Tolar, Y. Jiang, S. M. Buckley, B. Pelacho, T. C. Burns, S. Frommer, et al.
Hematopoietic reconstitution by multipotent adult progenitor cells: precursors to long-term hematopoietic stem cells
J. Exp. Med., January 22, 2007; 204(1): 129 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
X. Shi and D. J. Garry
Muscle stem cells in development, regeneration, and disease.
Genes & Dev., July 1, 2006; 20(13): 1692 - 1708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figure
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2004-12-4603v1
106/10/3646    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reyes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reyes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, J. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells
Right arrow Transplantation
Right arrow Stem Cells in Hematology
Right arrow Brief Reports
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020