Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 1 December 2005, Vol. 106, No. 12, pp. 3678-3679.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, W. H.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow


InsideBlood

CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS

Comment on Hiddemann et al, page 3725

R-CHOP strikes again with survival benefit in follicular lymphoma

Wyndham H. Wilson

NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE

Hiddemann and colleagues demonstrate improved response duration and overall survival with the addition of rituximab to CHOP, compared with CHOP alone, in symptomatic patients with untreated advanced-stage follicular lymphoma.

The arrival of rituximab (R) onto the therapeutic landscape heralded a new era in the treatment of B-cell lymphoma and provided a rational basis for its combination with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). Czuczman et al1 first demonstrated the benefits of R-CHOP in indolent lymphomas, but the broad applicability of their findings was uncertain due to limited sample size and absence of a control group. A recent 9-year follow-up of their study and the results of the present report, however, provide new evidence for the merits of R-CHOP and reshape treatment recommendations.2Go



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Molecular prognostic model of follicular lymphoma based on signatures of infiltrating "immune" cells.

 
In this issue of Blood, Hiddemann and colleagues report the results of a randomized study of CHOP versus R-CHOP in 428 patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma of grade I or II histology and requiring treatment. Responding patients younger than 60 years of age were offered a second randomization following CHOP or R-CHOP of either intensification with stem cell support or long-term interferon-{alpha} maintenance, whereas older patients received interferon-{alpha} maintenance. At the median follow-up time of 18 months (range, 1-38 months), the risk of treatment failure was reduced by 60% in the R-CHOP arm with benefit observed in patients younger or older than 60 years and with low or high international prognostic index scores. The time to next therapy also demonstrated an advantage for R-CHOP. Of great interest was the significant improvement in overall survival with R-CHOP, albeit only modest at the relatively short follow-up time. A justifiable caveat to a broad embrace of these findings is found in the secondary treatment requirement. It is reassuring that the secondary randomizations were stratified for risk and that the R-CHOP benefit was irrespective of interferon-{alpha} maintenance. It is notable though that the R-CHOP benefit was not observed among patients randomized to stem cell consolidation, suggesting that enhanced treatment efficacy and not the unique biologic attributes of rituximab may underlie the benefits of R-CHOP. It should also not escape notice that differential access to rituximab containing salvage treatment for patients on the 2 arms could account for the survival advantage of R-CHOP. Nevertheless, these results as well as those of Czuczman et al,2 where the observation time is quite mature, raise the specter of survival advantage, if not cure, with R-CHOP in follicular lymphoma. While many opinions might favor the notion that rituximab combined with CHOP delays relapse in follicular lymphoma, the prospect of cure should be considered with appropriate circumspection.

These results are of sufficient measure to reshape the debate from "if" to "when" patients should receive R-CHOP for the initial treatment of advanced-stage disease, not to mention its role in early-stage disease. Questions of who will benefit from treatment with R-CHOP, versus less "hair-razing" regimens like R-CVP (rituximab–cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone), will occupy the minds of oncologists and patients.3 Gene expression profiling, while providing insight into tumor biology, is also a powerful prognostic tool that may help identify beneficiaries of such treatment. This technology has revealed a central biologic role for infiltrating "reactive" cells, termed the immune reaction (IR), within the malignant lymph node on the survival of follicular lymphoma.4 The relative expression of 2 signatures, termed IR-1 and IR-2, that differentially express genes related to T-cell markers, macrophages, and/or dendritic cells, can be used to predict survival (see figure). It is not unreasonable, given the early benefits of rituximab on survival, to hypothesize that rituximab may impact tumors that predominantly express IR-2, as this signature is associated with short survival. Indeed, a recent study on gene expression associated with rituximab responsiveness suggested the relevance of immune cells albeit as negative predictors.5 The prospective application of these technologies to future trials is vital for understanding outcome biology and to guide the rational clinical development and use of new treatments. {blacksquare}

References

  1. Czuczman MS, Grillo-Lopez AJ, White CA, et al. Treatment of patients with low-grade B-cell lymphoma with the combination of chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and CHOP chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17: 268-276.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Czuczman MS, Weaver R, Alkuzweny B, Berlfein J, Grillo-Lopez AJ. Prolonged clinical and molecular remission in patients with low-grade or follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy: 9-year follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22: 4711-4716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Marcus R, Imrie K, Belch A, et al. CVP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CVP as first-line treatment for advanced follicular lymphoma. Blood. 2005;105: 1417-1423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Dave SS, Wright G, Tan B, et al. Prediction of survival in follicular lymphoma based on molecular features of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. N Engl J Med. 2004;351: 2159-2169.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Bohen SP, Troyanskaya OG, Alter O, et al. Variation in gene expression patterns in follicular lymphoma and the response to rituximab. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100: 1926-1930.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Frontline therapy with rituximab added to the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) significantly improves the outcome for patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma compared with therapy with CHOP alone: results of a prospective randomized study of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group
Wolfgang Hiddemann, Michael Kneba, Martin Dreyling, Norbert Schmitz, Eva Lengfelder, Rudolf Schmits, Marcel Reiser, Bernd Metzner, Harriet Harder, Susanna Hegewisch-Becker, Thomas Fischer, Martin Kropff, Hans-Edgar Reis, Mathias Freund, Bernhard Wörmann, Roland Fuchs, Manfred Planker, Jörg Schimke, Hartmut Eimermacher, Lorenz Trümper, Ali Aldaoud, Reza Parwaresch, and Michael Unterhalt
Blood 2005 106: 3725-3732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, W. H.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020