Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 1 August 2005, Vol. 106, No. 3, pp. 768-769.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fenaux, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ades, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fenaux, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ades, L.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow


InsideBlood

CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS

Comment on Jädersten et al, page 803

Erythropoietin for the anemia of low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Pierre Fenaux, and Lionel Ades

HÔPITAL AVICENNE; PARIS 13 UNIVERSITY

Recombinant EPO + G-CSF is an effective treatment of anemia in 40% of low-risk MDS, often with prolonged response and without increasing the risk of progression to AML.

There is now strong evidence that erythropoietin (EPO) + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) can correct anemia in about 40 % of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs), with a synergistic effect between the 2 drugs.1,2 The Stanford and Nordic MDS groups showed that low pretreatment serum EPO levels (< 500 U/L) and relatively low transfusion requirement (≤ 2 RBC units/month) were favorable prognostic factors of response to EPO + G-CSF, whereas patients classified in the low or intermediate-1 groups according to the MDS International prognostic scoring system (IPSS; based on percentage of marrow blasts, number of cytopenias, and karyotype) also had better response.1-3 However, most published studies with EPO in MDS had short follow-up and the long-term effect of EPO + G-CSF on anemia, natural disease history, and survival remained uncertain. In particular, the risk that those growth factors (especially G-CSF) could trigger progression to AML remained of concern.Go



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Multivariate Cox regression curves of the Epo-G compared with the IPSS/IMRAW cohort. See the complete figure in the article beginning on page 803.

 
In this issue, Jädersten and colleagues report the long term outcome of 129 MDS patients treated between 1990 and 1999 with EPO + G-CSF. The response rate was 39%. In the 41 responders (out of 48) who received maintenance treatment, median response duration was 23 months (range, 3-116+ months). Responses were more durable in patients with no excess of marrow blasts (RA and RARS), with an IPSS of low or intermediate 1 and in complete responders. Many patients required only low-maintenance doses of EPO and G-CSF (the latter could be stopped in several cases). Relapses that occurred on treatment were associated with disease progression in 30% of the cases, but remained unexplained in the other patients. Responders to EPO + G-CSF had better survival rates than nonresponders, and only 1 of the 20 patients with a response duration greater than 2 years progressed to AML.

The authors also compared their 129 patients with 334 well-matched untreated MDS patients selected from the cohort that served to establish the IPSS.3 They found that the incidence of progression to more aggressive disease, especially AML, and survival were similar in the 2 patient populations (Figure 3 of Jädersten et al). Although the comparison did not result from a randomized study, these findings are reassuring. Indeed, EPO, with or without G-CSF, is largely administered worldwide to improve anemia in MDS.

The authors finally confirm that, in high- and intermediate-2–risk MDS (according to IPSS), EPO, with or without G-CSF, is of limited use. In low- and intermediate-1–risk MDS patients, on the contrary, EPO remains a strong contender for new investigational treatments of anemia (with the probable exception of MDS with the 5q–syndrome, where responses to lenalidomide appear clearly superior).4 Whether novel erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins with prolonged half-life, like darbepoietin alpha, will further improve the results obtained with human recombinant EPO, as recently suggested,5 will have to be confirmed. {blacksquare}

References

  1. Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Gulbrandsen N, Lindberg G, et al. A validated decision model for treating the anaemia of myelodysplastic syndromes with erythropoietin + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: significant effects on quality of life. Br J Haematol. 2003;120: 1037-1046.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  2. Casadevall N, Durieux P, Dubois S, et al. Health, economic, and quality-of-life effects of erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomized, controlled trial. Blood. 2004;104: 321-327.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Greenberg P, Cox C, Le Beau MM, et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 1997;89: 2079-2088.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. List A, Kurtin S, Roe DJ, et al. Efficacy of lenalidomide in myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2005;352: 549-557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Manonne L, Gardin C, Quarre MC, et al. High response rate to darbopoetin alpha in "low risk" MDS: results of a phase II study [abstract]. Blood. 2004;104: 24a. Abstract no. 69.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Long-term outcome of treatment of anemia in MDS with erythropoietin and G-CSF
Martin Jädersten, Scott M. Montgomery, Ingunn Dybedal, Anna Porwit-MacDonald, and Eva Hellström-Lindberg
Blood 2005 106: 803-811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
S. D. Ross, I. E. Allen, C. A. Probst, B. Sercus, S. M. Crean, and G. Ranganathan
Efficacy and Safety of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Proteins in Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Oncologist, October 1, 2007; 12(10): 1264 - 1273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fenaux, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ades, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fenaux, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ades, L.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020