Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 1 April 2006, Vol. 107, No. 7, pp. 3010-3011.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geiger, H.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geiger, H.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, B. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

CORRESPONDENCE

To the editor:

Mutagenic potential of temozolomide in bone marrow cells in vivo

Therapy-related myeloid leukemias (t-MLs) occur in as many as 5% to 10% of patients who are otherwise cured of a primary neoplasm with aggressive multimodal regimens. Many patients with t-MLs or therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (t-MDS) have previously received chemotherapeutic agents that alkylate DNA, such as bis-chloroethyl-nitrosourea (BCNU) and cyclophosphamide (CP).1 We and other investigators have shown CP to be mutagenic in preclinical studies both in vitro and in vivo.2

Temozolomide (TMZ) is a more recently developed alkylating agent that has been effective in the treatment of adult high-grade glioma and refractory leukemia.3,4 TMZ is now being incorporated into initial therapy in more than 40 studies for a range of cancers, including glioblastoma and melanoma.5 TMZ's cytotoxicity depends on the methylation of guanine bases at the O6 position, resulting in O6-methylguanine and G:C->A:T transitions.6 Despite initial hopes that TMZ would be less leukemogenic than traditional alkylating agents, 2 groups have recently reported secondary myeloid malignancies after TMZ treatment in clinical studies.7,8 As TMZ moves into the front line of our chemotherapeutic armamentarium, further investigation of its in vivo mutagenic potential is warranted.

We used a transgenic mutation indicator mouse strain (small blue mouse) to compare the in vivo mutagenic potential of TMZ on bone marrow (BM) cells with that of CP. In this mouse model, the mutational target is the nontranscriptionally active lacZ portion of the plasmid pUR288. The mutation frequency was determined with a plasmid rescue procedure applied to genomic DNA derived from BM and with a subsequent selection for lac-Z negative clones, according to published protocols.9 The type of mutation was further determined by PCR amplification and restriction digestion.


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.. Strong mutagenic potential of TMZ in vivo. (A) Mutation frequency of BM cells derived from animals treated with either CP or TMZ in vivo, measured with the small blue mouse mutation indicator strain. (B) Frequency of point mutations (PM) in BM cells derived from animals treated with either CP or TMZ in vivo. Values shown are mean ± 1 SEM; n = 18 for untreated/vehicle, n = 4 for CP, and n = 4 for CP. *P < .05.

 
Animals were treated with TMZ (175 mg/kg/d intraperitoneally for 5 days), CP (200 mg/kg intraperitoneally either once or weekly for 6 weeks), or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and BM was harvested 10 days after the last treatment (Figure 1). TMZ and CP doses were chosen by treating C57BL/6 mice in groups of 10 to 20 until the development of neutropenia without mortality. Determination of the mutation frequency revealed that the 1-day CP treatment increased the mutational load in BM 2-fold over the control, whereas the TMZ regimen resulted in a 22-fold increase over control. BM cells in animals treated 6 times with CP did not show an increase in the mutation frequency over animals treated with only a single dose of CP. As we expected from TMZ's mechanism of action, over 90% of all mutations in response to TMZ treatment were point mutations.10 Fewer than 30% of the mutations in BM cells from animals treated with CP were point mutations, with the remaining mutations being either translocations or deletions. These data emphasize TMZ's mutagenic potential for BM cells in vivo in the mouse model system and may indicate that TMZ's mutagenic potential is the underlying cause of the recently reported t-MLs in TMZ-treated patients. We suggest close long-term hematological monitoring of patients receiving TMZ in clinical trials. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether the increased mutation rate seen with TMZ exposure results in a comparable elevated risk of therapy-induced leukemia.

Acknowledgements

Generation of the data was supported by The Mouse Core of the Division of Experimental Hematology, the Somatic Mutation Frequency Core at the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC), and funds from the Translational Research Initiative at CCHMC. We thank Jan Vijg and Martijn Dollé for their support in establishing the mutation assay at CCHMC. TMZ was obtained from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Developmental Therapeutics Program.

Hartmut Geiger, David Schleimer, Kalpana J. Nattamai, Stefanie R. Dannenmann, Stella M. Davies, and Brian D. Weiss

Correspondence: Hartmut Geiger, Division of Experimental Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229; e-mail: hartmut.geiger{at}cchmc.org.

References

  1. Smith SM, Le Beau MM, Huo D, et al. Clinical-cytogenetic associations in 306 patients with therapy-related myelodysplasia and myeloid leukemia: the University of Chicago series. Blood. 2003;102: 43-52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Mahgoub N, Taylor BR, Le Beau MM, et al. Myeloid malignancies induced by alkylating agents in Nf1 mice. Blood. 1999;93: 3617-3623.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Seiter K, Liu D, Siddiqui AD, Lerner R, Nelson J, Ahmed T. Evaluation of temozolomide in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Leuk Lymphoma. 2004;45: 1209-1214.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. Yung WK, Albright RE, Olson J, et al. A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse. Br J Cancer. 2000;83: 588-593.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  5. National Libraries of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Accessed October 2005.

  6. Bodell WJ, Gaikwad NW, Miller D, Berger MS. Formation of DNA adducts and induction of lacI mutations in Big Blue Rat-2 cells treated with temozolomide: implications for the treatment of low-grade adult and pediatric brain tumors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12: 545-551.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. De Vita S, De Matteis S, Laurenti L, et al. Secondary Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia after temozolomide [letter]. Ann Hematol. Prepublished online on July 26, 2005, as DOI: 10.1007/s00277-005-1093-6.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  8. Su YW, Chang MC, Chiang MF, Hsieh RK. Treatment-related myelodysplastic syndrome after temozolomide for recurrent high-grade glioma. J Neurooncol. 2005;71: 315-318.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  9. Vijg J, Dolle ME, Martus HJ, Boerrigter ME. Transgenic mouse models for studying mutations in vivo: applications in aging research. Mech Ageing Dev. 1997;99: 257-271.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  10. Gerson SL, Trey JE, Miller K, Benjamin E. Repair of O6-alkylguanine during DNA synthesis in murine bone marrow hematopoietic precursors. Cancer Res. 1987;47: 89-95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
X. Chen, N. Mitsutake, K. LaPerle, N. Akeno, P. Zanzonico, V. A. Longo, S. Mitsutake, E. T. Kimura, H. Geiger, E. Santos, et al.
Endogenous expression of HrasG12V induces developmental defects and neoplasms with copy number imbalances of the oncogene
PNAS, May 12, 2009; 106(19): 7979 - 7984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. Neyns, S. Cordera, E. Joosens, and P. Nader
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Patients With Glioma Treated With Temozolomide
J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2008; 26(27): 4518 - 4519.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. D. Milsom, M. Jerabek-Willemsen, C. E. Harris, A. Schambach, E. Broun, J. Bailey, M. Jansen, D. Schleimer, K. Nattamai, J. Wilhelm, et al.
Reciprocal Relationship between O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase P140K Expression Level and Chemoprotection of Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Cancer Res., August 1, 2008; 68(15): 6171 - 6180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
B. Verbeek, T. D. Southgate, D. E. Gilham, and G. P. Margison
O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase inactivation and chemotherapy
Br. Med. Bull., March 1, 2008; 85(1): 17 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
O. Krejci, M. Wunderlich, H. Geiger, F.-S. Chou, D. Schleimer, M. Jansen, P. R. Andreassen, and J. C. Mulloy
p53 signaling in response to increased DNA damage sensitizes AML1-ETO cells to stress-induced death
Blood, February 15, 2008; 111(4): 2190 - 2199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
R. J. Hansen, R. Nagasubramanian, S. M. Delaney, L. D. Samson, and M.E. Dolan
Role of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in protecting from alkylating agent-induced toxicity and mutations in mice
Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2007; 28(5): 1111 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geiger, H.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geiger, H.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, B. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020