Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 1 July 2006, Vol. 108, No. 1, pp. 8-9.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prchal, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Prchal, J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow


InsideBlood

HEMATOPOIESIS

Comment on Bellanné-Chantelot et al, page 346

Does JAK2 1849G>T initiate polycythemia vera?

Joseph Prchal

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE

In this issue of Blood, Bellanné-Chantelot and colleagues report on a remarkable and likely unparalleled collection of 72 families with 174 relatives who have myeloproliferative disorders.

The familial clustering of sporadic disorders of acquired clonal hematopoietic disorders is indeed rare.1 This clinical gold mine, which has taken decades and a cadre of academic hematologists in France and Belgium to accumulate, was subjected to molecular studies searching for the presence or absence of JAK2 1849G>T mutation. Multiple papers within a short period of time have reported on a somatic mutation in the autoinhibitory domain of JAK-2 present in the vast majority of polycythemia vera cases (reviewed in Emanuel and Prchal2). When the proportion of mutant JAK2 was enumerated, it was seen in either a minority and interpreted as a heterozygous mutation or in a majority and then interpreted as a homozygous mutation. This heterogeneity of mutation dose was previously shown to be generated by a process of uniparenteral disomy.3 Of importance, this mutation was shown to emulate the in vitro behavior of native polycythemia vera cells, such as erythropoietin independence of erythroid growth, and when introduced into mouse stem cells (only as a mutant transgene, ie, akin to "homozygous mutation") resulted in development of polycythemia and subsequently myelofibrosis.4 Additionally, the JAK2 1849G>T mutation was seen, albeit less often, in other myeloproliferative disorders and in patients with other clonal blood malignancies. This has raised the question of whether this is indeed the polycythemia vera-causing mutation. Of the 174 affected relatives in this French/Belgian study, 81 had polycythemia vera; 68, essential thrombocythemia; 11, myelofibrosis; and 12, chronic myeloid leukemia. About three quarters of polycythemia vera patients, and a significant proportion of the primary myelofibrosis and essential thrombocythemia patients, also had JAK2 1849G>T mutation. The prevalence of the JAK2 1849G>T mutation in these familial polycythemia vera patients was less than that seen in sporadic polycythemia vera by others.2

This convincing study of Bellanné-Chantelot and colleagues clearly points out that JAK2 1849G>T is not the disease-causing mutation; after all, the mutation in this large study was found only in myeloid progenitors and not in the germ line, and in some families, only some of the affected relatives had the JAK2 mutation. This contention is supported by other accumulating observations. First, if only one allele of JAK2 is mutated, then 50% of JAK2 should be JAK2 1849G>T; if both alleles are mutated, then 100% should be JAK2 1849G>T. However, careful quantitative studies of the proportion of JAK2 1849G>T mutation reveal that the mutant is less than 50%, more than 50%, and generally less than 100% in clonal polycythemia vera granulocytes, while 0%, 50%, or 100% proportions are seen in cells from single polycythemia vera erythroid burst-forming unit (BFU-E) colonies. Second, studies of clonogenic polycythemia vera erythroid BFU-Es show that those that are erythropoietin-independent are mainly those that contain approximately 100% of mutant Jak2 (regardless of the proportion of JAK2 mutant in clonal granulocytes) but occasional colonies are also 50% mutant JAK2 (J.P., unpublished data, 2006).

Clearly, this paper will serve as an invaluable resource to identify the polycythemia vera-initiating mutation(s) and may eventually elucidate why a single nucleotide mutation is a recurrent theme in so many acquired somatic mutations that constitute phenotypes of myeloproliferative and other clonal hematopoietic disorders. {blacksquare}

References

  1. Kralovics R, Stockton DW, Prchal JT. Clonal hematopoiesis in familial polycythemia vera suggests the involvement of multiple mutational events in the early pathogenesis of the disease. Blood. 2003;102: 3793-3796.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Emanuel P, Prchal JT. The molecular basis of polycythemia vera unraveled? Hematologist. 2005;2: 1-2.

  3. Kralovics R, Guan Y, Prchal JT. Acquired uniparental disomy of chromosome 9p is a frequent stem cell defect in polycythemia vera. Exp Hematol. 2002;30: 229-236.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. James C, Ugo V, Le Couedic JP, et al. A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera. Nature. 2005;434: 1144-1148.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Genetic and clinical implications of the Val617Phe JAK2 mutation in 72 families with myeloproliferative disorders
Christine Bellanné-Chantelot, Isabelle Chaumarel, Myriam Labopin, Florence Bellanger, Véronique Barbu, Claudia De Toma, François Delhommeau, Nicole Casadevall, William Vainchenker, Gilles Thomas, and Albert Najman
Blood 2006 108: 346-352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prchal, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Prchal, J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020