Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 November 2006, Vol. 108, No. 10, pp. 3420-3427.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on August 3, 2006; DOI 10.1182/blood-2006-03-010850.


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2006-03-010850v1
108/10/3420    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernández-Malavé, E.
Right arrow Articles by Terhorst, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fernández-Malavé, E.
Right arrow Articles by Terhorst, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Immunobiology
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

IMMUNOBIOLOGY

Overlapping functions of human CD3{delta} and mouse CD3{gamma} in {alpha}beta T-cell development revealed in a humanized CD3{gamma}-deficient mouse

Edgar Fernández-Malavé, Ninghai Wang, Manuel Pulgar, Wolfgang W. A. Schamel, Balbino Alarcón, and Cox Terhorst

From the Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain; the Division of Immunology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Max Planck-Institut für Immunobiologie, Freiburg, Germany; and the University of Freiburg, Germany.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Humans lacking the CD3{gamma} subunit of the pre-TCR and TCR complexes exhibit a mild {alpha}beta T lymphopenia, but have normal T cells. By contrast, CD3{gamma}-deficient mice are almost devoid of mature {alpha}beta T cells due to an early block of intrathymic development at the CD4CD8 double-negative (DN) stage. This suggests that in humans but not in mice, the highly related CD3{delta} chain replaces CD3{gamma} during {alpha}beta T-cell development. To determine whether human CD3{delta} (hCD3{delta}) functions in a similar manner in the mouse in the absence of CD3{gamma}, we introduced an hCD3{delta} transgene in mice that were deficient for both CD3{delta} and CD3{gamma}, in which thymocyte development is completely arrested at the DN stage. Expression of hCD3{delta} efficiently supported pre-TCR–mediated progression from the DN to the CD4+CD8+ double-positive (DP) stage. However, {alpha}betaTCR-mediated positive and negative thymocyte selection was less efficient than in wild-type mice, which correlated with a marked attenuation of TCR-mediated signaling. Of note, murine CD3{gamma}-deficient TCR complexes that had incorporated hCD3{delta} displayed abnormalities in structural stability resembling those of T cells from CD3{gamma}-deficient humans. Taken together, these data demonstrate that CD3{delta} and CD3{gamma} play a different role in humans and mice in pre-TCR and TCR function during {alpha}beta T-cell development.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The pre–T-cell receptor (TCR) and the {alpha}betaTCR are multimeric protein complexes expressed on the surface of developing T cells at different stages of their ontogeny in the thymus. The pre-TCR complex consists of a disulfide-linked heterodimer of an invariant pre-T{alpha} (pT{alpha}) and a variable TCRbeta chain noncovalently associated with the CD3{gamma}, {delta}, {epsilon}, and {zeta} polypeptides.1 The TCR contains an identical subunit composition but with a variable TCR{alpha} chain in lieu of pT{alpha}. Within the pre-TCR and TCR, the CD3 subunits are assembled as {gamma}{epsilon}, {delta}{epsilon}, and {zeta}{zeta} dimers, with all but CD3{zeta}{zeta} being structurally related.2 Functionally the CD3 proteins play a role in the assembly, surface transport, and signal capacity of the pre-TCR and TCR complexes.3,4

During thymocyte development, the pre-TCR and {alpha}betaTCR control discrete developmental checkpoints through which T-cell precursors have to pass to mature successfully.5,6 Signals initiated at the pre-TCR trigger progression from a CD44CD25+ CD4CD8 double-negative (DN) to a CD4+CD8+ double-positive (DP) differentiation stage, through CD44CD25 DN intermediates. Thus, only cells with a productive TCRbeta gene rearrangement undergo this transition (a checkpoint termed beta selection). Subsequently, signals emanating from the TCR determine the positive (survival and differentiation) and negative (clonal deletion) selection of immature DP thymocytes, processes that shape the repertoire of mature CD4+CD8 and CD4CD8+ single-positive (SP) T cells that exit from the thymus and populate the peripheral lymphoid organs. The position of the CD3 proteins at the initiation of the pre-TCR and TCR-mediated signaling cascade implies a critical role of these molecules in alternate signal transduction during thymic selection.

The overall structure and functioning of the pre-TCR and TCR complexes in mice and humans are quite similar. Despite this similarity, ablation of the highly related CD3{delta} and CD3{gamma} subunits has markedly different effects in mice and humans. In mice made deficient for CD3{delta}, thymocyte development is completely blocked at the DP stage due to defective TCR expression and function,7,8 but pre-TCR function is normal. On the other hand, CD3{delta}-deficient humans exhibit an earlier developmental block at the pre-TCR–controlled checkpoint.9,10 Loss of CD3{gamma} in the mouse results in a severe block at the DN-to-DP transition, indicating that pre-TCR signaling is defective.11 In particular, the majority of CD3{gamma}-deficient thymocytes cannot pass the CD44CD25+ DN checkpoint. In contrast, CD3{gamma}-deficient humans show only slightly reduced numbers of peripheral T cells, which display decreased TCR surface expression, and functional defects that lead to immunodeficiency with a variable spectrum of clinical signs.12 Since CD3{gamma}-deficient mice possess a different phenotype, a mouse model for this human disease is lacking to date.

To further dissect the roles of CD3{gamma} and CD3{delta} in mouse and human T-cell development, we crossed mice lacking CD3{gamma} and CD3{delta}, in which thymocyte development is completely arrested at the DN stage,13 with mice transgenic for a human CD3{delta} (hCD3{delta}) chain,14 resulting in the {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mouse strain. These mice incorporated the hCD3{delta} protein in surface pre-TCR and TCR complexes, and displayed a nearly normal-sized population of TCR-expressing DP cells, indicative of normal pre-TCR function. In contrast, {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg TCR complexes displayed an impaired capability to signal for efficient positive as well as negative selection and differentiation of DP thymocytes into mature T cells. Of importance, the T-cell compartment of {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice, in contrast to the previously reported mice lacking CD3{gamma},11 resembled that of CD3{gamma}-deficient humans. Therefore, this "humanized" mouse strain might be an adequate model system for the human CD3{gamma} immunodeficiency.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

CD3{gamma}-deficient mice expressing a human CD3{delta} chain (hereafter referred to as {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice) were generated by breeding CD3{gamma}{delta} doubly-deficient mice13 with a strain of transgenic mice, termed Tg{delta}4, which carries a low copy number of a human CD3{delta} transgene.14 Double mutant mice were identified by Southern blot and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). CD3{gamma}{delta} doubly-deficient mice expressing a mouse CD3{delta} transgene ({gamma}{delta} x m{delta}Tg) will be described in detail elsewhere. In all experiments, C57BL/6 mice were used as wild-type (WT) controls. Mice were analyzed at 6 to 8 weeks of age. CD3{gamma}-deficient and HY, OT-I, and AND TCR transgenic mice have been described elsewhere.11,15-17

Antibodies

For flow cytometry, the following biotinylated, FITC-, PE-, or PE-Cy5–conjugated antibodies were obtained from BD Biosciences Pharmingen (San Jose, CA): anti-CD3{gamma}{epsilon}/{delta}{epsilon} (clone 145-2C11), anti-CD3{gamma}{epsilon} (clone 17A2), anti-CD4 (clone RM4-5), anti-CD5 (clone 53-7.3), anti-CD8{alpha} (clone 53-6.7), anti-CD69 (clone H1.2F3), anti-TCRbeta (clone H57-597), anti-TCRV{alpha}2 (clone B20.1), anti-TCRVbeta3 (clone KJ25), and anti-TCRVbeta8 (clone MR5-2). Streptavidin-PE-Cy5 was used as second-step reagent. Immunoblottings were performed using the following antibodies: anti–phosphotyrosine 4G10 (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), anti–ZAP-70 (Zap4; a gift from S. Ley), anti–Cbl-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), anti-LAT (Upstate Biotechnology), anti-CD3{zeta} antibody 448,18 anti–phospho-MAPK (ERK, JNK, and p38), and anti–total MAPK (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA).

Flow cytometry

Cells were stained with specific fluorochrome-conjugated or biotinylated antibodies and analyzed by 2- or 3-color flow cytometry in a FACSCalibur flow cytometer using the CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA).

TCR stimulation, immunoprecipitation, and immunoblotting

Thymocytes were resuspended in PBS and incubated for 10 minutes at 4°C in the presence or absence of biotin-conjugated anti-CD3 (145-2C11) and anti-CD4 (RM4-5) antibodies. After removal of unbound antibody, the cells were incubated at 37°C for varying periods of time with 100 µg/mL streptavidin. After stimulation, cells were lysed in a buffer containing 1% Brij-96, 20 mM Tris-HCL (pH 7.8), 150 mM NaCl, and a cocktail of protease and phosphatase inhibitors. For immunoprecipitations, lysates were incubated overnight with specific antibodies preadsorbed to protein G–sepharose beads. The beads were washed 4 times in lysis buffer and resuspended in SDS sample buffer. Total cell lysates or immunoprecipitates were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), transferred to Immobilon-P (Millipore) membranes, and immunoblotted with specific antibodies. Bound antibodies were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham).

Protein analysis

For analysis of the TCR organization under nondenaturing conditions, blue native–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (BN-PAGE)19,20 was performed. Briefly, the TCR complex from digitonin lysates of pervanadate-stimulated thymocytes was immunoprecipitated with antiphosphotyrosine-coupled protein G–sepharose and eluted with phenylphosphate. After separation of the samples by BN-PAGE,21,22 the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and detected by immunoblotting with anti-CD3{zeta} antiserum 448. Ferritin was used as the marker protein in its 24-mer, 48-mer, and 72-mer forms (440 kDa, 880 kDa, and 1320 kDa, respectively). For antibody-shift assays, the antibody amounts indicated were added to the samples and incubated for 30 minutes on ice before BN-PAGE loading, as described.22

TCR-induced thymocyte death assays

Mice were injected with either vehicle alone (PBS) or anti-TCRbeta antibody (H57-597). After 48 hours, thymi were removed for analysis of thymocyte numbers and CD4/CD8 expression. For in vitro thymocyte death assay, cells were cultured in plastic wells precoated with the indicated amount of anti-TCRbeta antibody. After 48 hours, thymocytes were harvested and cell death was assessed by propidium iodide (PI) staining followed by flow cytometry. Specific cell death (%) denotes the percentage of dead (PI positive) cells in antibody-coated wells, normalized to control wells without antibody as follows:

Formula

Calcium mobilization

Calcium mobilization was measured by flow cytometry in Fluo-3-AM–loaded thymocytes upon addition of biotin-conjugated antibodies to CD3 and CD4 followed by cross-linking with streptavidin.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Restored DN-to-DP and impaired DP-to-SP transition in the thymus of CD3{gamma}{delta} doubly-deficient mice expressing a human CD3{delta} transgene

{gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice were generated by crossing mice lacking both CD3{gamma} and CD3{delta}, in which thymocyte development is completely arrested at the CD44CD25+ DN stage, with mice carrying a low copy number of a complete human CD3{delta} transgene controlled by its own regulatory elements. The size of the thymi and total thymocyte number of these {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice were relatively normal compared with control WT mice. Total thymocyte numbers (n = 10) were as follows: WT, 88 ± 31 x 106; {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg, 74 ± 17 x 106. Total splenocyte numbers (n = 9) were as follows: WT, 48 ± 15 x 106; {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg, 25 ± 6 x 106. Further, all thymocyte subsets defined by expression of CD4 and CD8 coreceptors were present in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice (Figure 1A).

More detailed analysis of the DN population revealed that progression beyond the CD44CD25+ DN stage, severely impaired in CD3{gamma}-deficient and CD3{gamma}{delta} doubly-deficient mice,11,13 proceeds efficiently in the thymi of {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice (Figure 1B upper panel). In contrast to DP cells in CD3{gamma}-deficient mice,11 numbers of DP thymocytes were comparable between {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg and WT mice (Figure 1A). Further, {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg DP cells lacked surface CD25 (Figure 1B lower panel). Together, these data indicate that expression of a human CD3{delta} transgene is able to restore pre-TCR function in the absence of CD3{gamma} in the mouse, resulting in the generation of DP thymocytes that were phenotypically normal. However, the numbers of CD4+ SP and CD8+ SP thymocytes in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice were reduced on average to 36% and 42%, respectively, of those in WT mice (Figure 1A). These mature thymocytes were able to migrate to and accumulate in peripheral lymphoid organs, as shown by the presence of CD4+ and CD8+ SP cells in the spleens of {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice, in numbers averaging 50% of those in WT mice (Figure 1A).


Figure 1
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.. Intrathymic T-cell development in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice. (A) Thymocytes and splenocytes from WT and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice were surface stained with anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry. Percentages of cells in quadrants and total cell numbers are shown within and above plots, respectively. (B) Dot plots show CD44/CD25 subsets in DN-gated cells (top panel), and CD25 expression in total thymocytes (bottom panel). TCR expression in total thymocytes (C) and in thymic and splenic CD4/CD8 subsets (D) of WT (dotted line) and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg (solid line) mice. Numbers within histograms indicate mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ratios of {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg versus WT cells. (E) Thymic CD4/CD8 subpopulations in CD3{gamma}-deficient and {gamma}{delta} x m{delta}Tg mice. Numbers within and above plots represent percentages of cells in the gated region and total cell numbers, respectively.

 
The pattern of {alpha}betaTCR expression on the surface of mutant thymocytes was indistinguishable from that of control WT thymocytes (Figure 1C upper panel), despite the specific absence of {gamma}{epsilon} dimers in the TCRs of these cells (Figure 1C lower panel). Furthermore, the up-regulation of {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg TCR expression was normal during intrathymic development in the absence of CD3{gamma} (Figure 1D). Yet, TCR surface expression in thymic and splenic SP cells from {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice was reduced in comparison with their WT counterparts (Figure 1D), although the extent of decrease was less than that reported for CD3{gamma}-deficient mice23 or humans.24 Also, the impairment of TCR expression in peripheral mature T cells from {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice was more prominent in CD4+ SP than in CD8+ SP cells (Figure 1D). This was in contrast with either CD3{gamma}-deficient mice or humans, where TCR expression is more markedly diminished in the CD8+ lineage.23,24 Collectively, these data confirm previous findings indicating that CD3{gamma} is not essential for TCR assembly and surface expression in mouse T cells.11 Further, these results demonstrate that a human CD3{delta} transgene can effectively support the DN-to-DP and, albeit with lesser efficiency, the DP-to-SP transition in mice lacking both CD3{delta} and CD3{gamma}. Rescue of intrathymic T-cell development does not appear to be related to simply transgene overexpression, since a mouse CD3{delta} transgene was unable to restore thymocyte cellularity and maturation in CD3{gamma}{delta} doubly-deficient mice (Figure 1E). Accordingly, thymic development in this {gamma}{delta} x m{delta}Tg strain resembled that of CD3{gamma}-deficient mice (Figure 1E), with most of the thymocytes arrested at the DN stage.

Human CD3{delta} substitutes both mouse CD3{gamma} and CD3{delta} in the {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg TCR

To determine the native structure of the TCR in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg T cells, and to characterize the impact of the CD3{gamma}-deficiency and incorporation of a human CD3{delta} on the composition and stability of the TCR complex, we performed blue native (BN)–PAGE analysis of the TCR expressed by WT and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg thymocytes (Figure 2A). The digitonin-extracted native TCR/CD3 complex isolated from WT thymocytes was visualized with anti-CD3{zeta} as a single band with mobility just below the 440-kDa ferritin marker. It had the stoichiometry of {alpha}beta{gamma}{epsilon}{delta}{epsilon}{zeta}{zeta} as reported before.22,25 In contrast, anti-CD3{zeta} detected 3 bands in the {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg complexes. The largest 2 bands had a size similar to the WT TCR complex. The highest mobility band consisted of free CD3{zeta} as a band with similar mobility appeared upon SDS treatment of the WT TCR (data not shown). SDS is a harsh detergent that disrupts all TCR complexes.

To characterize the subunit composition and stoichiometry of the TCR in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg T cells, we used a novel technique combining antibody-mediated gel-shift and BN-PAGE, termed native antibody-based mobility-shift (NAMOS) assay22 (Figure 2B). Digitonin lysates from WT and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg splenocytes were used to purify the TCR complex. Subsequently, the purified receptor was incubated with different amounts of the anti-CD3{epsilon} antibody 2C11 and then subjected to BN-PAGE. The WT TCR was shifted to 2 new bands (Figure 2B left). Since the complete ({alpha}beta{delta}{epsilon}{gamma}{epsilon}{zeta}{zeta}) TCR complex has 2 binding sites for 2C11 ({gamma}{epsilon} and {delta}{epsilon}), and since each antibody molecule bound to the complex produces a discrete change in electrophoretic mobility, the band appearing at the lowest amount of antibody tested is consistent with one antibody molecule bound to one TCR complex. The highest antibody amount generates a band likely corresponding to 2 antibody molecules associated with a single TCR complex, with an intermediate amount generating a mixture of the products observed at the highest and lowest amounts of shifting antibody (Figure 2B left). These data show that the WT TCR complex has 2 binding sites for 2C11 and, therefore, possesses 2 CD3 dimers ({gamma}{epsilon} and {delta}{epsilon}).


Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.. Native structure and composition of the TCR complex expressed in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg T cells. (A) The TCR complex was immunoprecipitated with antiphosphotyrosine antibodies from digitonin lysates of pervanadate-stimulated WT and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg thymocytes, and subsequently eluted with phenylphosphate. After separation by BN-PAGE, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and blotted with an anti-CD3{zeta} antibody. The positions of the complete TCR complex ({alpha}beta{gamma}{epsilon}{delta}{epsilon}{zeta}{zeta} in WT and {alpha}beta(h{delta}{epsilon})2{zeta}{zeta} in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg thymocytes), free CD3{zeta}, and a partial TCR complex (arrowhead) are indicated. (B) Phenylphosphate-eluted TCR complexes from WT and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg splenocytes were incubated with the indicated amounts of the antibodies 17A2 (anti-CD3{gamma}{epsilon}) or 2C11 (anti-CD3{gamma}{epsilon}/{delta}{epsilon}), and subsequently resolved by BN-PAGE. The Western blot membrane was developed with anti-CD3{zeta} antibodies. The number of antibody-mediated shifts of the TCR complex is indicated to the right.

 
The 2C11 antibody also produced 2 shifted bands when the {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg TCR complex was analyzed (Figure 2B right). This indicated that the mutant receptor contained 2 binding sites for 2C11 and corresponds therefore to a {alpha}beta(h{delta}{epsilon})2{zeta}{zeta} complex. The shift pattern of the band migrating immediately below the predominant TCR complex (Figure 2A arrowhead) was consistent with a partial TCR complex containing only one h{delta}{epsilon} dimer ({alpha}betah{delta}{epsilon}{zeta}{zeta}) (data not shown). As expected, the TCR of {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg T cells was not shifted by the anti-CD3{gamma}{epsilon} antibody 17A2 (Figure 2B right), whereas its WT counterpart was (Figure 2B left). Collectively, these data indicate that the majority of TCRs in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg T cells incorporates 2 h{delta}{epsilon} dimers per complex, thus keeping with the typical architecture of the WT TCR.22 Further, a minor fraction of partial TCR containing only one CD3 dimer (h{delta}{epsilon}) within the complex was detected. To date, it is unclear whether these complexes existed on the cell surface or were generated upon detergent lysis. Both cases could indicate that the chimeric TCR is less stable than the WT TCR.

Inefficient positive selection of thymocytes in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice

The decrease in the number of mature CD4+ and CD8+ SP thymocytes observed in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice suggested an impairment of positive selection. To test this, 3 transgenic TCRs were independently introduced onto the {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg background: HY, OT-I, and AND. The HY TCR recognizes a male-specific peptide in the context of MHC class I H-2b. Thymocytes expressing the HY TCR are positively selected as CD8+ SP cells in female H-2b mice.15 Consequently, 20.7% ± 7.6% of total thymocytes are CD8+ SP (Figure 3A upper panel and 3C). In contrast, only 2.3% ± 1.7% CD8+ SP cells were present in female HY {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice (Figure 3A upper panel and 3C). Numbers of CD8+ SP thymocytes were also reduced by 90% in the HY TCR mutant mice (Figure 3C). Positive selection of another MHC class I–restricted TCR (OT-I,16 specific for an ovalbumin peptide in the context of H-2b) was also affected in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice, albeit to a lesser degree (Figure 3A middle panel). In this case, the number of CD8+ SP cells was reduced by only 45% in OT-I transgenic {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg compared with WT mice (Figure 3C).

We next used mice expressing the pigeon cytochrome-C–specific TCR AND17 crossed with {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice to assess whether positive selection of class II–restricted CD4+ SP thymocytes was also affected. In AND {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice, the percentage and number of CD4+ SP cells were reduced to 32% and 43%, respectively, of those in WT mice (Figure 3A lower panel and 3C). This result demonstrated that the efficiency of positive selection of CD4+ T cells was also decreased in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice. Thus, positive selection of both class I– and class II–restricted T cells appeared to proceed less efficiently in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice. Yet, surface up-regulation of CD526 (data not shown) and the TCR (Figure 3B) along the DP-to-SP transition was comparable in WT and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg TCR transgenics, suggesting that positive selection is not qualitatively affected in the mutant mice.


Figure 3
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3.. Impaired positive selection in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice. (A) Dot plots show CD4 and CD8 expression in thymocytes from WT and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice expressing transgenic HY (females), OT-I, or AND TCR. Numbers within dot plots indicate the percentage of CD8+ or CD4+ SP cells in the gated region. (B) Histograms depict transgenic TCR expression, assessed with anti-TCRV{alpha} or anti-TCRVbeta antibodies, in DP and positively selected CD8+ (HY and OT-I) or CD4+ (AND) SP cells from WT (dotted line) and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg (solid line) mice. (C) Percentages (top panel) and absolute numbers (bottom panel) of CD8+ (HY and OT-I) or CD4+ (AND) SP thymocytes in TCR transgenic WT ({square}) and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg ({blacksquare}) mice. Five to 8 mice per group were analyzed. Error bars indicate the mean plus or minus standard deviation.

 
It could be argued that the defects in positive selection observed in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice result from a decrease in surface TCR expression on the DP population (Figure 3B), which is the one subjected to this selection process. To address this issue further, we performed functional assays of TCR signaling using the AND.DP.{gamma}–/– cell line. This cell line was established from a thymic tumor spontaneously arising in a mouse from our {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg colony bearing the AND TCR. It expresses surface CD4 and CD8, and TCR, but not CD3{gamma} (Figure 4A). Expression of the transgenic hCD3{delta} was detected by PCR (data not shown). Of interest, surface TCR expression in AND.DP.{gamma}–/– was even higher than that of DP cells from AND TCR transgenics (Figure 4B). Despite this high TCR expression, both CD69 and CD5 upregulation in response to TCR ligation with antibody or peptide-MHC,27,28 an event that correlates with positive selection,29 was clearly impaired in the DP thymocyte line when compared with its counterparts from WT AND TCR transgenics (Figure 4C). To exclude that this defect was entirely due to the transformed state of the cell line, we analyzed activation marker up-regulation in primary DP thymocytes from {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice, in which TCR surface expression is comparable with that of WT DP cells (Figure 1D). TCR-mediated up-regulation of CD69 and CD5 expression was also reduced in primary {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg DP thymocytes compared with their WT counterparts (Figure 4D), although to a lesser extent than in the thymocyte line. Together, these data suggest that TCR complexes incorporating a human CD3{delta} chain and lacking CD3{gamma} have an impaired signaling capability, and that this defect is not related to the TCR density on the thymocyte surface.

Impaired negative selection and TCR-induced thymocyte death in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice

To study negative selection in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice, we analyzed male HY TCR transgenics. In male (but not in female) H-2b mice, thymocytes expressing the HY TCR are negatively selected as a result of extensive apoptotic cell death at the DP stage upon recognition of male-specific peptide and MHC.15 Indeed, only 3% DP cells were detected in WT HY TCR mice (Figure 5A top panel). In contrast, HY {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice exhibited a partial but clear defect in negative selection, demonstrated by the persistent DP population that constituted 56% of the thymocytes (Figure 5A top panel). Moreover, splenic CD8+ SP T cells that escaped intrathymic clonal deletion in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice were CD8high, in contrast to WT mice where they expressed characteristically low levels of surface CD830 (Figure 5A bottom panel). Furthermore, thymocyte death induced by anti-TCR antibody in vivo31 (Figure 5B), and in vitro (Figure 5C), was markedly reduced in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice. Collectively, these data indicate that effective coupling of the TCR to death-inducing pathways in thymocytes, and resulting negative selection, is impaired in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice.

Reduced strength of TCR-initiated signals in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg thymocytes

To determine whether thymocytes from {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice exhibited a TCR signaling defect, we analyzed several intracellular events associated with TCR signal transduction. Early biochemical events elicited upon TCR engagement,32 namely tyrosine phosphorylation of src- and syk-kinase substrates including ZAP-70, Cbl-1, and LAT, were markedly attenuated but not completely abrogated in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg thymocytes, and also in AND TCR transgenic {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg thymocytes compared with their WT counterparts (Figure 6A). Although a reduced level of tyrosine phosphorylation of key signal-transduction molecules was found in anti-TCR–activated thymocytes (Figure 6A), it would appear though that no single pathway was affected specifically. TCR-induced calcium mobilization32 was also decreased in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg thymocytes compared with their WT counterparts (Figure 6B).

TCR-dependent transient activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) ERK, JNK, and p38 has been shown to affect thymocyte selection.33 We therefore examined the phosphorylation levels of these enzymes as an indication of their activation state. Upon in vitro TCR ligation with antibody, phosphorylation of the ERK, JNK, and p38 kinases was diminished in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg thymocytes compared with control WT cells (Figure 6C). Thus, {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice display a general and quantitative defect in the TCR-induced activation of all MAPK pathways in the thymus. Taken together, these data demonstrate that proximal as well as distal signaling events coupled to TCR stimulation in thymocytes are markedly attenuated in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice.


Figure 4
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4.. TCR expression and signaling in a DP thymocyte line expressing hCD3{delta} and lacking CD3{gamma}. (A) The AND.DP.{gamma}–/– line was surface stained with antibodies to CD4, CD8, TCRbeta, and CD3{gamma}{epsilon} and analyzed by flow cytometry. (B) The histogram shows surface TCR (TCRbeta) expression in the AND.DP.{gamma}–/– line (solid line) compared with DP thymocytes from AND TCR transgenic mice (dotted line). (C) CD69 and CD5 up-regulation in AND TCR transgenic DP thymocytes (left panels) or the AND.DP.{gamma}–/– line (right panels) after 48-hour stimulation with 1 µg plastic-bound anti-TCRbeta antibody or with DCEK cells preloaded with 2 µM pigeon cytochrome C (PCC) peptide 88-100. Shaded curves represent marker expression in unstimulated cells. (D) CD69 and CD5 up-regulation (left panels) in WT and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg DP thymocytes stimulated for 48 hours with 0.5 µg (solid line) or 5 µg (dotted line) anti-TCRbeta antibody, or in unstimulated cells (shaded curves), as determined by 3-color flow cytometry. Numbers within histograms represent the percentage of cells in the marked region for unstimulated (upper value) or anti-TCR–stimulated (0.5 µg, middle value; 5 µg, lower value) DP thymocytes. MFI values of CD69 and CD5 expression in WT ({square}) and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg ({blacksquare}) DP thymocytes stimulated with the indicated amount of anti-TCRbeta antibody are plotted at the right.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In mice lacking CD3{gamma}, due to targeted gene disruption, the DN-to-DP transition is severely impaired,11 most likely as a consequence of defective pre-TCR function. Thus, mature T cells are practically absent in the peripheral lymphoid organs of CD3{gamma}-deficient mice. In contrast, T lymphocyte numbers are grossly normal or only slightly diminished in CD3{gamma}-deficient humans,12 suggesting that in humans, but not in mice, the highly related CD3{delta} chain is capable of functionally replacing CD3{gamma} during thymopoiesis. Here, we show that human CD3{delta} could restore mouse T-cell development in the absence of CD3{gamma} by expressing a hCD3{delta} transgene in CD3{gamma}{delta} doubly-deficient mice.

In the {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mouse strain, the pre-TCR–mediated DN-to-DP transition was efficiently restored by hCD3{delta} expression. It is rather intriguing that human but not mouse11 CD3{delta} can replace CD3{gamma} for pre-TCR–mediated thymocyte development. In the absence of CD3{gamma}, the amount of CD3{delta} could be limiting with regard to pre-TCR expression. In this scenario, enhanced expression of transgenic (relative to endogenous) CD3{delta} would overcome that limitation, allowing the expression of CD3{gamma}-lacking pre-TCR complexes. This appears unlikely as the relative amount of intracellular CD3{epsilon}-containing dimers in DN thymocytes was comparable in WT, CD3{gamma}-deficient, and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice (data not shown). Also, CD3{delta}{epsilon} dimers present on the surface of CD3{gamma}-deficient DN thymocytes are sufficient to mediate developmental progression when engaged with anti-CD3 antibodies,11 or to permit the expression of a transgenic {alpha}betaTCR and rescue of the DN-to-DP transition.34 Finally, early thymocyte development was not restored in CD3{gamma}{delta} doubly-deficient mice expressing a mouse CD3{delta} transgene. In line with this, a human CD3 transgene that encodes full-length CD3{delta} and a truncated but functional form of CD3{epsilon} restored the defective pre-TCR function in CD3{gamma}- and CD3{gamma}{delta}-deficient mice.35 Therefore, in the absence of CD3{gamma}, human but not mouse CD3{delta} appears to endow the pre-TCR complex with specific properties essential for pre-TCR function. Whatever these properties might be, they appear to be independent of the signal-transducing ITAM motif, as early thymocyte development proceeded unaffected in mice expressing a CD3{gamma} chain lacking the ITAM motif.34 Accordingly, the differential capability of human versus mouse CD3{delta} to functionally replace CD3{gamma} within the pre-TCR must map in the extracellular and/or transmembrane domain, as it has previously been shown for CD3{delta} regarding TCR function and thymocyte selection.8 In the extracellular region, there are several amino acid positions where human but not mouse CD3{delta} matches mouse CD3{gamma}. Whether these residues contribute specific structural and/or functional features to the pre-TCR complex deserves further investigation.


Figure 5
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5.. Impaired negative selection and antibody-induced thymocyte death in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice. Dot plots (A) of CD4 and CD8 expression in thymocytes and splenocytes from WT and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg HY TCR male mice, or (B) of thymocytes removed from WT (left) and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg (right) mice 48 hours after intraperitoneal injection with either vehicle alone (PBS) or 200 µg anti-TCRbeta antibody. Percentages of gated cells and total thymocyte numbers are shown within and above plots, respectively. MFI denotes mean fluorescence intensity of CD8 staining in the gated region. (C) In vitro anti-TCR antibody–induced death of WT (bullet) and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg ({circ}) thymocytes cultured for 48 hours in plastic wells precoated with the indicated amount of anti-TCRbeta antibody. Cell death was assessed by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry.

 
The reduced number of mature CD4+ and CD8+ SP thymocytes in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice suggested a defect in TCR-mediated thymocyte selection. This was confirmed by using 3 different transgenic {alpha}betaTCRs expressed in the {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg background. Positive selection of both these class I– or class II–restricted TCR transgenic T cells was markedly reduced in the mutant mouse, but without any sign of alteration in lineage commitment. Negative selection was similarly impaired in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice. Further, these defects were not likely related to decreased TCR surface expression in mutant DP cells, as pointed out by our studies with the AND.DP.{gamma}–/– thymocyte line, which presented defects in TCR signaling despite expressing high levels of receptor on the cell surface. Collectively, our results demonstrate that positive and negative selection proceeded less efficiently in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice, probably because signals from CD3{gamma}-lacking TCR incorporating human CD3{delta} are weaker. The latter is supported by the observation that signaling events proximal to TCR stimulation were markedly attenuated, but not totally abrogated, in thymocytes from {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice. More distal TCR-triggered events were also quantitatively but not qualitatively affected. A recent study further supports this notion by showing that the strength of signaling by CD4 and CD8 coreceptor tails determines the number but not the lineage direction of positively selected thymocytes,36 a phenotype similar to that observed in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice. Our results are also consistent with the impairment in TCR-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation and calcium mobilization found in T cells from CD3{gamma}-deficient patients.37,38 Similarly to mature T cells in CD3{gamma}-deficient humans,24,37 but in contrast to CD3{gamma}-null mutant mice,23 splenocytes from {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice showed normal up-regulation of CD69 and CD25 in response to anti-TCR antibody stimulation (data not shown). Further, like human T cells lacking CD3{gamma},37 {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg splenocytes exhibited defective phorbol ester–stimulated but only slightly reduced anti-TCR antibody-induced TCR down-regulation (data not shown). Taken together, these results indicate that TCR signaling is grossly similar in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice and CD3{gamma}-deficient humans.


Figure 6
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6.. Attenuated TCR-mediated signaling in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg thymocytes. (A) Phosphotyrosine immunoblots of total cell lysates from WT and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg thymocytes (left), or AND TCR transgenic WT and {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg thymocytes (right), unstimulated (time 0) or stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD4 antibodies for the times indicated. The identities of some of the induced phosphoproteins were determined by immunoblotting with specific antibodies, as shown for Cbl-1 and LAT in the lower panels. (B) Calcium mobilization and (C) phosphorylated (active) MAPK (pERK, pJNK, and pp38) induction in thymocytes stimulated with cross-linked anti-CD3 and anti-CD4 antibodies. Fold activation of each MAPK relative to unstimulated (time 0) cells is indicated. Protein loading was assessed with antibodies to total ERK, JNK, and p38.

 
The {alpha}betaTCR complex expressed by thymocytes from {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice retained epitopes recognized by antibodies to murine TCRbeta (H57-597) and CD3{gamma}{epsilon}/{delta}{epsilon} dimers (145-2C11). Further, the mutant TCR complex displayed the same stoichiometry as that of the WT TCR. Together, these data indicate that the {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg TCR topologically resembles CD3{gamma}-sufficient TCR in some aspects. Of importance, abnormal glycosylation of hCD3{delta} (data not shown) was observed for the {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg TCR. This might explain its slightly reduced electrophoretic mobility under native conditions compared with the WT TCR, and its inability to trigger late T-cell activation in response to the lectin concanavalin A (data not shown). In addition, a weak association of CD3 chains, including hCD3{delta}/CD3{epsilon} and CD3{zeta}, to the TCR{alpha}beta heterodimer was observed for the {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg TCR complex. These alterations in glycosylation and stability have also been reported for T cells from human CD3{gamma}-deficient individuals,39 and they could be partly underlying the impaired signaling capability of the TCR in {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice.40,41 Whether CD3{gamma} provides specific functions to the TCR that are essential for thymocyte selection34 remains an open question, awaiting the analysis of more CD3{gamma}-deficient TCR transgenic mice.

CD3{gamma} and CD3{delta} appeared for the first time in mammals as a result of the duplication of an ancestral gene found in birds with properties of both CD3 chains.42 The evolution of CD3{gamma} and CD3{delta} as discrete subunits in mammals suggests that they might have some nonredundant but essential functions within the pre-TCR and TCR complexes. The present study further demonstrates that CD3{delta} and CD3{gamma} play different roles in pre-TCR and TCR function in mice and humans.

The gross phenotype of {gamma}{delta} x h{delta}Tg mice, in contrast to previously reported CD3{gamma}-deficient mice,11 resembled that of humans who lack expression of the CD3{gamma} protein.43 Thus, this humanized CD3{gamma}-deficient mouse strain may constitute a valuable tool44 to analyze the consequences of the CD3{gamma} deficiency in a more detailed way than is now possible in human patients, and for the design and preclinical evaluation of therapeutic strategies to correct human disorders associated with CD3 deficiencies.45


    Footnotes
 
Submitted March 21, 2006; accepted July 9, 2006.

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, August 3, 2006; DOI 10.1182/blood-2006-03-010850.

Supported by grants BMC2002-01431 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Education (MEC) (E.F.-M.), GR/SAL/0168/2004 from Community of Madrid (E.F.-M.), and Areces Foundation (to the Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa [CBMSO]). E.F.-M. is supported by the "Ramón y Cajal" Program of MEC. M.P. was supported by a BEFI fellowship from the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS). W.W.A.S. was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the Emmy Noether program (SCHA 976/1) and through SFB620.

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.

Reprints: Edgar Fernández-Malavé, Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain; e-mail: efernandez{at}cbm.uam.es.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. von Boehmer H, Fehling HJ. Structure and function of the pre-T cell receptor. Annu Rev Immunol. 1997;15: 433-452.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  2. Clevers H, Alarcon B, Wileman T, Terhorst C. The T cell receptor/CD3 complex: a dynamic protein ensemble. Annu Rev Immunol. 1988;6: 629-662.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  3. Alarcon B, Gil D, Delgado P, Schamel WW. Initiation of TCR signaling: regulation within CD3 dimers. Immunol Rev. 2003;191: 38-46.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. Kruisbeek AM, Haks MC, Carleton M, Michie AM, Zuniga-Pflucker JC, Wiest DL. Branching out to gain control: how the pre-TCR is linked to multiple functions. Immunol Today. 2000;21: 637-644.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  5. Malissen B, Ardouin L, Lin SY, Gillet A, Malissen M. Function of the CD3 subunits of the pre-TCR and TCR complexes during T cell development. Adv Immunol. 1999;72: 103-148.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  6. Starr TK, Jameson SC, Hogquist KA. Positive and negative selection of T cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2003;21: 139-176.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  7. Dave VP, Cao Z, Browne C, et al. CD3 delta deficiency arrests development of the alpha beta but not the gamma delta T cell lineage. EMBO J. 1997;16: 1360-1370.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  8. Delgado P, Fernandez E, Dave V, Kappes D, Alarcon B. CD3delta couples T-cell receptor signalling to ERK activation and thymocyte positive selection. Nature. 2000;406: 426-430.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  9. Dadi HK, Simon AJ, Roifman CM. Effect of CD3delta deficiency on maturation of alpha/beta and gamma/delta T-cell lineages in severe combined immunodeficiency. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 1821-1828.[Free Full Text]

  10. de Saint Basile G, Geissmann F, Flori E, et al. Severe combined immunodeficiency caused by deficiency in either the delta or the epsilon subunit of CD3. J Clin Invest. 2004;114: 1512-1517.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  11. Haks MC, Krimpenfort P, Borst J, Kruisbeek AM. The CD3gamma chain is essential for development of both the TCRalphabeta and TCRgammadelta lineages. EMBO J. 1998;17: 1871-1882.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  12. Arnaiz-Villena A, Timon M, Corell A, Perez-Aciego P, Martin-Villa JM, Regueiro JR. Brief report: primary immunodeficiency caused by mutations in the gene encoding the CD3-gamma subunit of the T-lymphocyte receptor. N Engl J Med. 1992;327: 529-533.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  13. Wang B, Wang N, Salio M, et al. Essential and partially overlapping role of CD3gamma and CD3delta for development of alphabeta and gammadelta T lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1998;188: 1375-1380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  14. Wang B, Biron C, She J, et al. A block in both early T lymphocyte and natural killer cell development in transgenic mice with high-copy numbers of the human CD3E gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91: 9402-9406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Kisielow P, Teh HS, Bluthmann H, von Boehmer H. Positive selection of antigen-specific T cells in thymus by restricting MHC molecules. Nature. 1988;335: 730-733.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  16. Hogquist KA, Jameson SC, Heath WR, Howard JL, Bevan MJ, Carbone FR. T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell. 1994;76: 17-27.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  17. Kaye J, Hsu ML, Sauron ME, Jameson SC, Gascoigne NR, Hedrick SM. Selective development of CD4+ T cells in transgenic mice expressing a class II MHC-restricted antigen receptor. Nature. 1989;341: 746-749.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  18. Sahuquillo AG, Roumier A, Teixeiro E, Bragado R, Alarcon B. T cell receptor (TCR) engagement in apoptosis-defective, but interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing, T cells results in impaired ZAP70/CD3-zeta association. J Exp Med. 1998;187: 1179-1192.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Schagger H, von Jagow G. Blue native electrophoresis for isolation of membrane protein complexes in enzymatically active form. Anal Biochem. 1991;199: 223-231.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  20. Schagger H, Cramer WA, von Jagow G. Analysis of molecular masses and oligomeric states of protein complexes by blue native electrophoresis and isolation of membrane protein complexes by two-dimensional native electrophoresis. Anal Biochem. 1994;217: 220-230.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  21. Schamel WW, Reth M. Monomeric and oligomeric complexes of the B cell antigen receptor. Immunity. 2000;13: 5-14.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  22. Schamel WW, Arechaga I, Risueno RM, et al. Co-existence of multivalent and monovalent TCRs explains high sensitivity and wide range of response. J Exp Med. 2005;202: 493-503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  23. Haks MC, Cordaro TA, van den Brakel JH, et al. A redundant role of the CD3 gamma-immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif in mature T cell function. J Immunol. 2001;166: 2576-2588.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  24. Pacheco-Castro A, Alvarez-Zapata D, Serrano-Torres P, Regueiro JR. Signaling through a CD3{gamma}-deficient TCR/CD3 complex in immortalized mature CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1998;161: 3152-3160.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  25. Zapata DA, Schamel WW, Torres PS, et al. Biochemical differences in the alphabeta T cell receptor.CD3 surface complex between CD8+ and CD4+ human mature T lymphocytes. J Biol Chem. 2004;279: 24485-24492.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  26. Azzam HS, Grinberg A, Lui K, Shen H, Shores EW, Love PE. CD5 expression is developmentally regulated by T cell receptor (TCR) signals and TCR avidity. J Exp Med. 1998;188: 2301-2311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  27. Kuhlman P, Moy VT, Lollo BA, Brian AA. The accessory function of murine intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in T lymphocyte activation: contributions of adhesion and co-activation. J Immunol. 1991;146: 1773-1782.[Abstract]

  28. Fernandez E. Thymocyte development past the CD4(+)CD8(+) stage requires an active p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. Blood. 2000;95: 1356-1361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  29. Yamashita I, Nagata T, Tada T, Nakayama T. CD69 cell surface expression identifies developing thymocytes which audition for T cell antigen receptor-mediated positive selection. Int Immunol. 1993;5: 1139-1150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  30. Kisielow P, Bluthmann H, Staerz UD, Steinmetz M, von Boehmer H. Tolerance in T-cell-receptor transgenic mice involves deletion of nonmature CD4+8+ thymocytes. Nature. 1988;333: 742-746.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  31. Shi YF, Bissonnette RP, Parfrey N, Szalay M, Kubo RT, Green DR. In vivo administration of monoclonal antibodies to the CD3 T cell receptor complex induces cell death (apoptosis) in immature thymocytes. J Immunol. 1991;146: 3340-3346.[Abstract]

  32. Alberola-Ila J, Takaki S, Kerner JD, Perlmutter RM. Differential signaling by lymphocyte antigen receptors. Annu Rev Immunol. 1997;15: 125-154.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  33. Rincon M. MAP-kinase signaling pathways in T cells. Curr Opin Immunol. 2001;13: 339-345.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  34. Haks MC, Pepin E, van den Brakel JH, et al. Contributions of the T cell receptor-associated CD3gamma-ITAM to thymocyte selection. J Exp Med. 2002;196: 1-13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  35. Pan Q, Brodeur JF, Drbal K, Dave VP. Different role for mouse and human CD3delta/varepsilon heterodimer in preT cell receptor (preTCR) function: human CD3delta/varepsilon heterodimer restores the defective preTCR function in CD3gamma- and CD3gammadelta-deficient mice. Mol Immunol. 2006;43: 1741-1750.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  36. Bosselut R, Feigenbaum L, Sharrow SO, Singer A. Strength of signaling by CD4 and CD8 coreceptor tails determines the number but not the lineage direction of positively selected thymocytes. Immunity. 2001;14: 483-494.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  37. Torres PS, Zapata DA, Pacheco-Castro A, Rodriguez-Fernandez JL, Cabanas C, Regueiro JR. Contribution of CD3 gamma to TCR regulation and signaling in human mature T lymphocytes. Int Immunol. 2002;14: 1357-1367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  38. Perez-Aciego P, Alarcon B, Arnaiz-Villena A, et al. Expression and function of a variant T cell receptor complex lacking CD3-gamma. J Exp Med. 1991;174: 319-326.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  39. Zapata DA, Pacheco-Castro A, Torres PS, et al. Conformational and biochemical differences in the TCR.CD3 complex of CD8(+) versus CD4(+) mature lymphocytes revealed in the absence of CD3gamma. J Biol Chem. 1999;274: 35119-35128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  40. Rudd PM, Elliott T, Cresswell P, Wilson IA, Dwek RA. Glycosylation and the immune system. Science. 2001;291: 2370-2376.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  41. Sun ZJ, Kim KS, Wagner G, Reinherz EL. Mechanisms contributing to T cell receptor signaling and assembly revealed by the solution structure of an ectodomain fragment of the CD3 epsilon gamma heterodimer. Cell. 2001;105: 913-923.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  42. Gobel TW, Dangy JP. Evidence for a stepwise evolution of the CD3 family. J Immunol. 2000;164: 879-883.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  43. Arnaiz-Villena A, Timon M, Rodriguez-Gallego C, Iglesias-Casarrubios P, Pacheco A, Regueiro JR. T lymphocyte signalling defects and immunodeficiency due to the lack of CD3 gamma. Immunodeficiency. 1993;4: 121-129.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  44. Macchiarini F, Manz MG, Palucka AK, Shultz LD. Humanized mice: are we there yet? J Exp Med. 2005;202: 1307-1311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  45. Simonte SJ, Cunningham-Rundles C. Update on primary immunodeficiency: defects of lymphocytes. Clin Immunol. 2003;109: 109-118.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JEMHome page
G. M. Siegers, M. Swamy, E. Fernandez-Malave, S. Minguet, S. Rathmann, A. C. Guardo, V. Perez-Flores, J. R. Regueiro, B. Alarcon, P. Fisch, et al.
Different composition of the human and the mouse {gamma}{delta} T cell receptor explains different phenotypes of CD3{gamma} and CD3{delta} immunodeficiencies
J. Exp. Med., October 29, 2007; 204(11): 2537 - 2544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Touma, Z.-Y. J. Sun, L. K. Clayton, W. E. Marissen, A. M. Kruisbeek, G. Wagner, and E. L. Reinherz
Importance of the CD3{gamma} Ectodomain Terminal beta-Strand and Membrane Proximal Stalk in Thymic Development and Receptor Assembly
J. Immunol., March 15, 2007; 178(6): 3668 - 3679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. J. Recio, M. A. Moreno-Pelayo, S. S. Kilic, A. C. Guardo, O. Sanal, L. M. Allende, V. Perez-Flores, A. Mencia, S. Modamio-Hoybjor, E. Seoane, et al.
Differential Biological Role of CD3 Chains Revealed by Human Immunodeficiencies
J. Immunol., February 15, 2007; 178(4): 2556 - 2564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2006-03-010850v1
108/10/3420    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernández-Malavé, E.
Right arrow Articles by Terhorst, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fernández-Malavé, E.
Right arrow Articles by Terhorst, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Immunobiology
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020