Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 August 2006, Vol. 108, No. 4, pp. 1421-1423.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on April 6, 2006; DOI 10.1182/blood-2006-02-001933.


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2006-02-001933v1
108/4/1421    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jabbour, E.
Right arrow Articles by de Lima, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jabbour, E.
Right arrow Articles by de Lima, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neoplasia
Right arrow Transplantation
Right arrow Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressors
Right arrow Brief Reports
Right arrow Clinical Trials and Observations
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents

TRANSPLANTATION
Brief report

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphocytic leukemia after Bcr-Abl kinase mutation–related imatinib failure

Elias Jabbour, Jorge Cortes, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Sergio Giralt, Dan Jones, Roy Jones, Francis Giles, Borje S. Andersson, Richard Champlin, and Marcos de Lima

From the Departments of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Leukemia, and Hematopathology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 
Resistance to imatinib mesylate is an emerging problem in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), often associated with point mutations in the Bcr-Abl kinase domain. Outcome of patients with such mutations after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) is unknown. Ten imatinib-resistant patients with Bcr-Abl kinase mutations received a transplant: 9 had CML (3 in chronic phase, 4 in accelerated phase, and 2 in blast phase) and 1 had Philadelphia-positive acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). Patients harbored 9 different protein kinase mutations (T315I mutation, n = 2). Preparative regimens were ablative (n = 7) and nonablative (n = 3). All patients engrafted; there were no treatment-related deaths. Disease response was complete molecular (CMR; n = 7), major molecular (n = 2), and no response (n = 1). Three patients (mutations Q252H, E255K, and T315I) died of relapse after Allo-SCT. Seven patients are alive (6 in CMR) for a median of 19 months. Allo-SCT remains an important salvage option for patients who develop resistance to imatinib through Bcr-Abl mutations.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 
Imatinib mesylate is a potent and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has become standard therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).1,2 Most newly diagnosed CML patients with chronic-phase (CP) disease treated with imatinib achieve durable responses. However, a small percentage of CP patients and most advanced-phase subjects relapse on therapy.3-5

Resistance to imatinib occurs at a rate of approximately 4% per year among patients treated in early CP and at higher rates in those treated in advanced stages. Resistance is most frequently mediated by mutations within the kinase domain of Bcr-Abl and, to a lesser extent, by amplification of the Bcr-Abl genomic locus and other mechanisms.6,7 Point mutations have been reported in 30% to 90% of resistant patients.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) is a potentially curative treatment for CML.8 However, there is little data in patients with imatinib resistance–associated mutations. In order to address this problem, we analyzed the outcome of patients with Bcr-Abl kinase mutations treated with related or unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) at our institution.


    Study design
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 
Between July 2002 and October 2005, 10 patients with imatinib-refractory CML (n = 9) or Philadelphia-positive (Ph-positive) acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL; n = 1) received allo-SC transplants from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)–matched related (n = 5) or unrelated (n = 5) donors. Failure to imatinib was defined as (1) loss of a cytogenetic or complete hematologic response (CHR) while on therapy; (2) failure to achieve a CHR (for patients in CP) or any hematologic response (for patients in accelerated phase [AP] or blast phase [BP]) after 3 months of imatinib therapy; or (3) persistence of 100% Ph-positive metaphases after 6 months or greater than 35% after 12 months of therapy.

Preparative regimens are described in Table 1. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and methotrexate 5 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 3, 6, and 11 after transplantation. All patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 µg/kg daily from day 7 until neutrophil engraftment. Antithymocyte globulin was given to recipients of unrelated donor transplants. Informed consent was obtained in all cases. The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.. Patient and transplantation characteristics

 
Standard criteria were used to score CML response.9 A complete molecular response (CMR) was defined as an undetectable Bcr-Abl transcript level. A major molecular response (MMR) was defined as Bcr-Abl/Abl ratio less than 0.05%.

Bcr-Abl transcripts were quantitated in a single-tube multiplex real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay using TaqMan chemistry (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).10 Total RNA was isolated from peripheral blood or bone marrow samples by Trizol solubilization (Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) and cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcriptase (Superscript II; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The resulting cDNA was subjected to PCR to amplify b2a2, b3a2, and e1a2 Bcr-Abl fusion transcripts, and quantitative Bcr-Abl levels were normalized to total abl transcript levels as described previously.10

For mutational analysis, the entire kinase domain of the Bcr-Abl fusion transcript was sequenced using a nested PCR method. The Bcr-Abl fusion transcript was first amplified followed by 2 separate PCR reactions that cover exons 221 to 390 and codons 350 to 500 of the Abl kinase domain, respectively, essentially as described.11 Standard dideoxy chain termination cycle sequencing was done using a 3100 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems) with analysis using Seqscape v2.0 software (Applied Biosystems). All mutations were confirmed by sequencing of forward and reverse strands, with approximate sensitivity of 15% mutation-bearing cells.11

Hematopoietic chimerism was evaluated on peripheral blood or bone marrow by multiplex PCR-based DNA microsatellite polymorphism analysis using PCR D6S264, D3S1282, D18S62, and D3S1300 fluorescence-labeled primer sets, followed by separation by capillary electrophoresis and analysis using GeneScan software (Applied Biosystems). Mixed chimerism was defined as the presence of any detectable (1%) recipient DNA.

Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute criteria. GVHD was graded according to consensus criteria.12


    Results and discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 
A total of 10 patients (3 in CP, 4 in AP, 2 in BP, and 1 with Ph-positive ALL) received a transplant. The median age was 44 years (range, 26-63 years). Nine different protein kinase mutations were detected. Five patients harbored a P-loop mutation. At the time of Allo-SCT, 1 patient (patient unique identifier [UPIN] 5) was in MMR (Ph-positive ALL, mutation Q252H), 1 (UPIN 7) was in major cytogenetic response, and 2 (UPIN 4 and 10) were in complete hematologic response. The 6 remaining patients were in CP (n = 2) and AP (n = 4) with no hematologic response. Patients' characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

All patients engrafted at a median of 13 days (range, 10-17 days). There were no major toxicities and no treatment-related deaths. Chimerism studies at days 30 and 100 after HSCT were 100% of donor type in all but 1 patient. Nine patients achieved a complete cytogenetic response 1 month after transplantation. All patients were assessed for molecular response more than once: 7 achieved a CMR at a median of 2 months (range, 1-6 months) after transplantation; 2 achieved an MMR (mutations F359V and T315I) by 3 and 4 months after transplantation, with transcript levels of 0.012% and 0.04%, respectively (the first one [UPIN 9] is still responding with the last transcript level of 0.004%, while the second relapsed [UPIN 6] after 6 months). Three patients (ALL with Q252H [UPIN 5], AP with T315I [UPIN 6], and BP with E255K [UPIN 10]) progressed and died of their disease, respectively, 7, 11, and 4 months after Allo-SCT. Patients UPIN 5 and 6 had achieved a CMR and an MMR, whereas patient UPIN 10 did not respond to Allo-SCT. Seven patients are alive (6 in CMR and 1 in MMR) after a median follow-up of 19 months (range, 13-24 months). Outcomes of treatment are summarized in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.. Transplantation outcomes

 
This is the first report on the outcome of imatinib mesylate–refractory patients with kinase mutations undergoing Allo-SCT. Specifically, we showed that in such cases, Allo-SCT is feasible, safe, and frequently effective. A high rate of complete clinical and molecular responses was achieved, despite the fact that most patients received a transplant with imatinib-resistant advanced disease. In this small series, we could detect no difference in outcome between P-loop versus non–P-loop mutations.9 Interestingly, 1 of the 2 patients with the T315I mutation responded and remains in molecular remission after 17 months of follow-up, whereas the other relapsed 6 months after transplantation and died shortly after that. This mutation confers resistance to imatinib and to the novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors (NTKIs).13,14

The NTKIs dasatinib (BMS-354825) and AMN-107, currently being evaluated in clinical trials, have shown promising results in patients with CML resistant to imatinib.15-17 Both drugs are active in patients with mutant Bcr-Abl kinase except when the disease is driven by the T315I mutation. In advanced-stage patients such as ours, consideration should be given to maintenance use of NTKI or other agents after transplantation.

These preliminary results support the use of Allo-SCT as a salvage option for patients developing resistance to imatinib through Bcr-Abl mutations. This subset of patients is likely to benefit from early transplantation, should a suitable related or unrelated donor be identified. Long-term follow-up of a larger number of patients will be necessary to fully document the efficacy and benefit of allogeneic transplantation in this setting.


    Footnotes
 
Submitted February 6, 2006; accepted March 26, 2006.

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, April 6, 2006; DOI 10.1182/blood-2006-02-001933.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

Reprints: Marcos de Lima, Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 423, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: mdelima{at}mdanderson.org.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 

  1. Faderl S, Talpaz M, Estrov Z, O'Brien S, Kurzrock R, Kantarjian HM. The biology of chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1999;341: 164-172.[Free Full Text]

  2. Goldman JM, Melo JV. Chronic myeloid leukemia: advances in biology and new approaches to treatment. N Engl J Med. 2003;349: 1451-1464.[Free Full Text]

  3. O'Brien SG, Guilhot F, Larson RA, et al. Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2003;348: 994-1004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Druker BJ, Sawyers CL, Kantarjian H, et al. Activity of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in the blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Philadelphia chromosome. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 1038-1042.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Talpaz M, Silver RT, Druker BJ, et al. Imatinib induces durable hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia: results of a phase 2 study. Blood. 2002;99: 1928-1937.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Gorre ME, Mohammed M, Ellwood K, et al. Clinical resistance to STI-571 cancer therapy caused by BCR-ABL gene mutation or amplification. Science. 2001;293: 876-880.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Hochhaus A, Kreil S, Corbin AS, et al. Molecular and chromosomal mechanisms of resistance to imatinib (STI571) therapy. Leukemia. 2002;16: 2190-2196.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  8. Zaucha JM, Prejzner W, Giebel S, et al. Imatinib therapy prior to myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005;36: 417-424.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  9. Kantarjian HM, O'Brien S, Cortes JE, et al. Treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive, accelerated-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia with imatinib mesylate. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8: 2167-2176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  10. Cortes J, Talpaz M, O'Brien S, et al. Molecular responses in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase treated with imatinib mesylate. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11: 3425-3432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Branford S, Rudzki Z, Walsh S, et al. Detection of BCR-ABL mutations in patients with CML treated with imatinib is virtually always accompanied by clinical resistance, and mutations in the ATP phosphate-binding loop (P-loop) are associated with a poor prognosis. Blood. 2003;102: 276-283.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  12. Przepiorka D, Smith TL, Folloder J, et al. Risk factors for acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation. Blood. 1999;94: 1465-1470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  13. Shah NP, Tran C, Lee FY, Chen P, Norris D, Sawyers CL. Overriding imatinib resistance with a novel ABL kinase inhibitor. Science. 2004;305: 399-401.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  14. O'Hare T, Walters DK, Stoffregen EP, et al. In vitro activity of Bcr-Abl inhibitors AMN107 and BMS-354825 against clinically relevant imatinib-resistant Abl kinase domain mutants. Cancer Res. 2005;65: 4500-4505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Kantarjian HM, Ottman O, Cortes J, et al. AMN107, a novel aminopyrimidine inhibitor of Bcr-Abl, has significant activity in imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia-chromosome positive acute lymphoid leukemia (Ph + ALL) [abstract]. Blood. 2005;106: 15a. Abstract 37.

  16. Talpaz M, Kantarjian HM, Paquette R, et al. A phase I study of BMS-354825 in patients with imatinib-resistant and intolerant chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): results from CA180002. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23: 564s.

  17. Sawyers CL, Shah NP, Kantarjian HM, et al. A phase I study of BMS-354825 in patients with imatinib-resistant and intolerant accelerated and blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): results from CA180002. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23: 565s.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
haematolHome page
F. Palandri, F. Castagnetti, G. Alimena, N. Testoni, M. Breccia, S. Luatti, G. Rege-Cambrin, F. Stagno, G. Specchia, B. Martino, et al.
The long-term durability of cytogenetic responses in patients with accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib 600 mg: the GIMEMA CML Working Party experience after a 7-year follow-up
Haematologica, February 1, 2009; 94(2): 205 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. M. Goldman
How I treat chronic myeloid leukemia in the imatinib era
Blood, October 15, 2007; 110(8): 2828 - 2837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
H. de Lavallade, J. S. Khorashad, H. P. Davis, D. Milojkovic, J. S. Kaeda, J. M. Goldman, J. F. Apperley, and D. Marin
Interferon-{alpha} or homoharringtonine as salvage treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia patients who acquire the T315I BCR-ABL mutation
Blood, October 1, 2007; 110(7): 2779 - 2780.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
haematolHome page
F. E. Nicolini, S. Hayette, S. Corm, E. Bachy, D. Bories, M. Tulliez, F. Guilhot, L. Legros, F. Maloisel, J.-J. Kiladjian, et al.
Clinical outcome of 27 imatinib mesylate-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia patients harboring a T315I BCR-ABL mutation
Haematologica, September 1, 2007; 92(9): 1238 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
F. J. Giles, J. Cortes, D. Jones, D. Bergstrom, H. Kantarjian, and S. J. Freedman
MK-0457, a novel kinase inhibitor, is active in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia or acute lymphocytic leukemia with the T315I BCR-ABL mutation
Blood, January 15, 2007; 109(2): 500 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
S. Branford
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Molecular Monitoring in Clinical Practice
Hematology, January 1, 2007; 2007(1): 376 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2006-02-001933v1
108/4/1421    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jabbour, E.
Right arrow Articles by de Lima, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jabbour, E.
Right arrow Articles by de Lima, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neoplasia
Right arrow Transplantation
Right arrow Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressors
Right arrow Brief Reports
Right arrow Clinical Trials and Observations
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020