Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 1 January 2007, Vol. 109, No. 1, pp. 387.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hollak, C. E. M.
Right arrow Articles by vom Dahl, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hollak, C. E. M.
Right arrow Articles by vom Dahl, S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

CORRESPONDENCE

Low-dose versus high-dose therapy for Gaucher disease: goals and markers

To the editor:

Zimran et al state in their commentary1 that the title of our study2 is misleading because the superior effect of a high dose of imiglucerase compared with a low dose is "limited to the response of 2 surrogate markers, serum chitotriosidase and MRI scanning of the marrow."1(p802) We agree that no superiority of the higher dose was established with respect to the most widely used parameters of disease (ie, cytopenia and organ volumes), although subtle differences may not have become apparent due to the limited number of matched pairs for each parameter. In fact, we have shown in the past that one ninth of the originally established dose leads to sustainable improvements in a subset of adults.3 The question arises: how do we best evaluate the efficacy of enzyme replacement therapy in Gaucher disease by optimally exploiting available biomarkers? By definition, biomarkers are either clinical markers or mechanism-based biochemical markers that correlate with observed outcomes. The biomarkers could be used in clinical studies as proof of concepts or clinical end points.4 For example, in diabetes, glycosylated hemoglobin can serve as a biochemical marker and measures of nephropathy as a clinical marker, which should be evaluated against clinical end points, such as life or death, cure or failure, or time to an event. Of interest, for Gaucher disease, these clinical end points are not at all clearly defined: the overall goals of treatment are still the subject of debate.5 Obvious goals are to achieve normal growth and development in children, normal blood counts, absence of symptomatic organomegaly, and absence of new skeletal events. Ultimately, complications such as fibrosis of the liver and the occurrence of malignancies should be prevented. How do these goals relate to the existing biomarkers? Earlier meta-analyses have focused on liver size as a clinical marker;6 however, its relation with these outcome measures was never thoroughly validated. The absence of a "gold standard" for disease severity in Gaucher patients hampers the validation of any marker, whether liver size or chitotriosidase. At least for chitotriosidase, there is the observation that in spleen tissue the relation between chitotriosidase levels and stored glucosylceramide is almost linear, and there is immunohistochemical evidence that chitotriosidase is secreted by Gaucher cells.7 Clinically, the enormous elevation in plasma, the prompt decrease upon successful treatment,2 and the increase of chitotriosidase upon treatment interruption8 indicate that it might even be the best of all biomarkers. As to the validity of decreased bone marrow fat fraction (the triglyceride content of the marrow and not the "Gaucher fat") in relation to clinical bone disease, a decrease in the fat fraction of 10% is associated with an increased risk for occurrence of bone complications of 85%.9 No other marker for skeletal disease has proved superior.

In summary, there is novel evidence for dose dependence for the enzymatic effects of imiglucerase on 2 well-established markers. Apparently, this finding has aroused a discussion that hopefully will stimulate a critical evaluation of clinical and biochemical markers against predefined goals of therapy.

4294967295

Carla E. M. Hollak, Maaike de Fost, Johannes M. F. G. Aerts, and Stephan vom Dahl

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Carla E. M. Hollak,Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Academic Medical Center, P. O. Box 22660, F4-279, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands; c.e.hollak{at}amc.uva.nl.

References

  1. Zimran A, Elstein D, Beutler E. Cellular origin and lineage specificity of the JAK2V617F allele in polycythemia vera Blood Prepublished on April 25, 2006 as DOI 10.1182/blood-2006-03-010801. (Now available as Blood. 2006;108:802-803).[Free Full Text]

  2. de Fost M, Hollak CE, Groener JE, et al. Superior effects of high dose enzyme replacement therapy in type 1 Gaucher disease on bone marrow involvement and chitotriosidase levels: a two center retrospective analysis. Blood Prepublished on March 9, 2006, as DOI 10.1182/blood-2005-12-5072. (Now available as Blood. 2006;108:830-835).[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Hollak CE, Aerts JM, Goudsmit R, et al. Individualised low-dose alglucerase therapy for type 1 Gaucher's disease. Lancet 1995; 345:1474–1478.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. Colburn WA and Lee JW. Biomarkers, validation and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling. Clin Pharmacokinet 2003; 42:997–1022.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  5. Weinreb NJ, Aggio MC, Andersson HC, et al. Gaucher disease type 1: revised recommendations on evaluations and monitoring for adult patients. Semin Hematol 2004; 41:(suppl 5), 15–22.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  6. Beutler E. Enzyme replacement in Gaucher disease. PLoS Med 2004; 1:118–121.

  7. Boven LA, van Meurs M, Boot RG, et al. Gaucher cells demonstrate a distinct macrophage phenotype and resemble alternatively activated macrophages. Am J Clin Pathol 2004; 122:359–369.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  8. vom Dahl S, Poll LW, Häussinger D. Clinical monitoring after cessation of enzyme replacement therapy in M. Gaucher. Brit J Haematol 2001; 113:1084–1086.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  9. Maas M, Hollak CE, Akkerman EM. Quantification of skeletal involvement in adults with type I Gaucher's disease: fat fraction measured by Dixon quantitative chemical shift imaging as a valid parameter. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179:961–965.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles in Blood Online:

Superior effects of high-dose enzyme replacement therapy in type 1 Gaucher disease on bone marrow involvement and chitotriosidase levels: a 2-center retrospective analysis
Maaike de Fost, Carla E. M. Hollak, Johanna E. M. Groener, Johannes M. F. G. Aerts, Mario Maas, Ludger W. Poll, Maaike G. Wiersma, Dieter Häussinger, Sarah Brett, Nicole Brill, and Stephan vom Dahl
Blood 2006 108: 830-835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Low-dose therapy trumps high-dose therapy again in the treatment of Gaucher disease
Ari Zimran, Deborah Elstein, and Ernest Beutler
Blood 2006 108: 802-803. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
haematolHome page
J. Schmitz, L. W. Poll, and S. v. Dahl
Therapy of adult Gaucher disease
Haematologica, February 1, 2007; 92(2): 148 - 152.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hollak, C. E. M.
Right arrow Articles by vom Dahl, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hollak, C. E. M.
Right arrow Articles by vom Dahl, S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020