Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 1 January 2007, Vol. 109, No. 1, pp. 389-390.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wouters, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Delwel, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wouters, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Delwel, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents

CORRESPONDENCE

A recurrent in-frame insertion in a CEBPA transactivation domain is a polymorphism rather than a mutation that does not affect gene expression profiling–based clustering of AML

To the editor:

Mutations in CEBPA, the gene encoding the transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBPalpha), have been reported in multiple studies, and are found in approximately 8% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).1,2 Specific regions of the gene tend to be most commonly mutated: (1) in-frame insertions in the basic/leucine zipper (bZIP) region and (2) truncating out-of-frame insertions or deletions in the N-terminus.1,2 Although mutations are most frequently found in these 2 regions, other abnormalities have been described as well.2 Fröhling et al reported in 6 of 236 AML cases the existence of an in-frame insertion mutation of 6 nucleotides.3 This insertion is predicted to result in a histidine-proline duplication (HP196-197ins) in a transactivation domain of C/EBPalpha. In vitro studies have suggested that this proline-histidine–rich region may play a role in antiproliferative control, although this notion has not been supported by in vivo experiments.4,5 Remarkably, in none of the other initial CEBPA mutation studies was the insertion reported as either a mutation or a polymorphism, notwithstanding the fact that investigators frequently applied single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis or nucleotide-sequenced the complete CEBPA cDNA (see Leroy et al2 for references). More recently, one other group described the HP duplication in 20 (20%) of 100 AML samples.6 In this study, the insertion was reported in 7 (39%) of 19 healthy volunteers as well, questioning its role in AML.6

In a cohort of 285 AML cases, we previously selectively screened for the 2 major mutation types and identified 17 patients with mutations.7,8 Here, we asked whether this cohort also included cases with HP196-197ins. By means of a denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC) approach9 and subsequent nucleotide sequencing, we identified the heterozygous HP196-197ins in 9 patients (3.2% of 282 available samples). We also screened an independent second cohort of 305 AML cases, and again found 12 cases (3.9%) to present with this duplication. Finally, we analyzed a series of 274 nonleukemic blood samples and found 22 individuals (8.0%) to carry the same insertion.

Cases with CEBPA mutations were found predominantly in 2 distinct gene expression clusters8 (Figure 1). We asked whether cases with HP196-197ins associated with specific gene expression clusters as well. The 9 specimens carrying HP196-197ins in the first cohort of 285 AML cases did not cluster with CEBPA mutant cases. Moreover, they did not belong to one single previously defined cluster of AML, but were spread out over several subgroups instead (Figure 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Correlation view of 285 AML cases including CEBPA status. Pairwise correlations between samples are displayed using 2856 probe sets as described.8 Colors of boxes visualize Pearson correlation coefficient: red indicates higher positive correlation; blue indicates higher negative correlation. Bars next to each sample represent CEBPA status: mutation in bZIP region and/or N-terminus (red), presence of HP196-197ins (blue), or neither (green). For 3 specimens, depicted in white, no material was available for dHPLC analysis. The figure was generated using HeatMapper software (http:www.erasmusmc.nl/hematologie/heatmapper/).10

 
We conclude that HP196-197ins represents a common CEBPA polymorphism, rather than a mutation, that does not influence gene expression profiling–based clustering of AML specimens. Whether the higher percentage of HP196-197ins observed in nonleukemic samples compared with AML cases is due to chance, or represents an important difference, remains to be elucidated in larger series.

4294967295

Bas J. Wouters, Irene Louwers, Peter J. M. Valk, Bob Löwenberg, and Ruud Delwel

This work was supported by a grant from the Dutch Cancer Society "Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds" (EMCR 2006-3522).

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Ruud Delwel,Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Hematology, Room Ee1342, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands; e-mail: h.delwel{at}erasmusmc.nl.

References

  1. Nerlov C. C/EBPalpha mutations in acute myeloid leukaemias. Nat Rev Cancer 2004; 4:394–400.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  2. Leroy H, Roumier C, Huyghe P, Biggio V, Fenaux P, Preudhomme C. CEBPA point mutations in hematological malignancies. Leukemia 2005; 19:329–334.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  3. Fröhling S, Schlenk RF, Stolze I, et al. CEBPA mutations in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics: prognostic relevance and analysis of cooperating mutations. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:624–633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Wang H, Iakova P, Wilde M, et al. C/EBPalpha arrests cell proliferation through direct inhibition of Cdk2 and Cdk4. Mol Cell 2001; 8:817–828.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  5. Porse BT, Pedersen TA, Hasemann MS, et al. The proline-histidine-rich CDK2/CDK4 interaction region of C/EBPalpha is dispensable for C/EBPalpha-mediated growth regulation in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:1028–1037.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Lin LI, Chen CY, Lin DT, et al. Characterization of CEBPA mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: most patients with CEBPA mutations have biallelic mutations and show a distinct immunophenotype of the leukemic cells. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11:1372–1379.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani S, Erpelinck C, Meijer J, et al. Biallelic mutations in the CEBPA gene and low CEBPA expression levels as prognostic markers in intermediate-risk AML. Hematol J 2003; 4:31–40.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  8. Valk PJ, Verhaak RG, Beijen MA, et al. Prognostically useful gene-expression profiles in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1617–1628.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  9. Verhaak RG, Goudswaard CS, van Putten W, et al. Mutations in nucleophosmin (NPM1) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): association with other gene abnormalities and previously established gene expression signatures and their favorable prognostic significance. Blood 2005; 106:3747–3754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  10. Verhaak RG, Sanders MA, Bijl MA, et al. HeatMapper: powerful combined visualization of gene expression profile correlations, genotypes, phenotypes and sample characteristics. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7:337.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Frohling, A. Corbacioglu, R. F. Schlenk, H. Dohner, and K. Dohner
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol., June 10, 2007; 25(17): 2494 - 2495.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wouters, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Delwel, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wouters, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Delwel, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
Sponsor: Genentech BioOncology and and Biogen Idec
Blood Online is supported in part by
Genentech BioOncology and Biogen Idec
  Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020