Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 May 2007, Vol. 109, No. 10, pp. 4110.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

InsideBlood

CLINICAL TRIALS AND OBSERVATIONS

Comment on Guilhot et al, page 4143

Dasatinib in accelerated phase

Stephen O'Brien

NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY

The paper by Guilhot and colleagues extends the reported clinical experience with dasatinib in describing the outcome of 107 chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with the drug in accelerated phase having failed, or been intolerant of, imatinib. Although the follow-up is quite short (8 months minimum), the results are encouraging even in this difficult phase of the disease.

The long-term durability of responses to imatinib in patients with early chronic-phase CML has recently been reported,1 and thankfully the occurrence of drug resistance in this group of patients remains low. In chronic-phase patients who do develop imatinib resistance or intolerance, dasatinib has been shown to be effective salvage therapy,2 producing complete hematologic response (CHR) and major cytogenetic response (MCR) rates of 90% and 52%, respectively.3 Dasatinib has also been shown to be superior to higher-dose imatinib (800 mg) in rescuing patients failing on imatinib 400 mg.4

The data presented in this issue describe CHR and MCR rates in accelerated phase of 39% and 33%, respectively, with 24% managing to achieve a complete cytogenetic response (CCR)—quite an achievement in this difficult group of patients. The follow-up is short and so far of 69 patients who achieved good hematologic responses, 7 have progressed. The durability of the responses is, of course, still uncertain until longer follow-up is reported. The Achilles heel of both dasatinib and nilotinib is that neither of these promising new drugs is effective against leukemia cells harboring the T315I ABL kinase domain mutation. A longer-term concern, especially with advanced CML, is whether clones will inevitably emerge with this mutation and be a harbinger of inevitable drug resistance. Progress in CML drug therapy still continues at quite a remarkable pace: last month in Blood the first clinical data on MK-0457,5 a drug that does seem to be effective against T315I, were published. Other promising agents are in development.

So where do we go next in the drug treatment of CML? Dasatinib is now licensed in many countries and nilotinib may well follow before too long. Other new agents may well become available to prescribers in the next few years. We face some tough challenges: the cost of these new agents is high, presenting considerable difficulties to health funders, patients, and physicians in terms of access to effective treatment. We also need to think carefully about how to use these agents logically in terms of both clinical and cost effectiveness. Comparative studies that address not only efficacy but also quality of life and health economic considerations will certainly be required.

Footnotes

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author has received research funds for clinical trials from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, and Novartis. {blacksquare}

REFERENCES

  1. Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O'Brien SG, et al. Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:2408–2417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Talpaz M, Shah NP, Kantarjian H, et al. Dasatinib in imatinib-resistant Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:2531–2541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Hochhaus A, Kantarjian HM, Baccarani M, et al. Dasatinib induces notable hematologic and cytogenetic responses in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of imatinib therapy. Prepublished on November 30, 2006, as DOI 10.1182/blood-2006-09-047266 (Now available as Blood. 2007;109:2303-2309.).[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Kantarjian H, Pasquini R, Hamerschlak N, et al. Dasatinib or high-dose imatinib for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of first-line imatinib: a randomized phase-II trial. Blood Prepubished on February 22, 2007, as DOI 10.1182/blood-2006-11-056028.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Giles FJ, Cortes J, Jones D, et al. MK-0457, a novel kinase inhibitor, is active in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia or acute lymphocytic leukemia with the T315I BCR-ABL mutation. Blood 2007; 109:500–502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Dasatinib induces significant hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in accelerated phase
Francois Guilhot, Jane Apperley, Dong-Wook Kim, Eduardo O. Bullorsky, Michele Baccarani, Gail J. Roboz, Sergio Amadori, Carmino A. de Souza, Jeffrey H. Lipton, Andreas Hochhaus, Dominik Heim, Richard A. Larson, Susan Branford, Martin C. Muller, Prasheen Agarwal, Ashwin Gollerkeri, and Moshe Talpaz
Blood 2007 109: 4143-4150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020