Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 January 2007, Vol. 109, No. 2, pp. 792-794.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on September 12, 2006; DOI 10.1182/blood-2006-07-033985.


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2006-07-033985v1
109/2/792    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertwistle, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sherr, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bertwistle, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sherr, C. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neoplasia
Right arrow Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressors
Right arrow Brief Reports
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

NEOPLASIA

Brief report

Regulation of the Arf tumor suppressor in Eµ-Myc transgenic mice: longitudinal study of Myc-induced lymphomagenesis

David Bertwistle1, and Charles J. Sherr2,

1 Department of Genetics & Tumor Cell Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Memphis, TN; 2 Department of Genetics & Tumor Cell Biology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 References
 
Lymphomagenesis in Eµ-Myc mice is opposed by the Arf tumor suppressor, whose inactivation compromises p53 function and accelerates disease. Finding nascent Eµ-Myc–induced tumors in which p19Arf causes cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis is problematic, since such cells will be eliminated until Arf or p53 function is lost. Knock-in mice expressing a green fluorescent protein (GFP) in lieu of Arf coding sequences allow analysis of Arfpromoter regulation uncoupled from p19Arf action. Prior to frank lymphoma development, unexpectedly low levels of Eµ-Myc–induced p19Arf or GFP were expressed. However, as lymphomas arose in Arf+/GFP heterozygotes, additional oncogenic events synergized with Eµ-Myc to further induce the functionally null Arf-Gfp allele. Concomitant up-regulation of p19Arf was not observed; instead, the wild-type allele was inactivated. We infer that very low levels of Arf are tumor suppressive, and that further induction provides the selective pressure for the emergence of tumors that have inactivated the gene.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 References
 
The CDKN2A (INK4A/ARF) locus, which encodes 2 distinct tumor suppressors (p16INK4a and p14ARF) from partially overlapping reading frames, is commonly inactivated in human cancers.1,2 Mice homozygous or heterozygous for an Arf-null allele are predisposed to cancer, and tumors arising in Arf+/– mice inactivate the wild-type Arf allele, indicating that Arf behaves as a classical "2-hit" tumor suppressor gene. Arf is induced by abnormally sustained, increased thresholds of mitogenic signals emanating from mutationally activated or dysregulated oncogenes. In turn, the Arf protein (p19Arf in mice) antagonizes the activity of the p53-negative regulator Mdm2 to induce a p53 transcriptional response that leads to cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis.2,3

Consequences of Arf inactivation have been widely studied in Eµ-Myc transgenic mice46 in which Myc, regulated by the immunoglobulin heavy chain enhancer-promoter, is expressed in B lymphocytes.79 Eµ-Myc mice exhibit an initial preneoplastic phase characterized by polyclonal expansion of pre-B cells already evident before birth.8 Within their first year of life, these mice develop malignant monoclonal lymphomas (mean latency of 25 weeks). Biallelic loss of Arf occurs in approximately 25% of these animals, whereas another 33% display p53 mutations.4 Arf+/– Eµ-Myc mice more rapidly develop tumors (mean latency, 7-10 weeks depending on strain background) in which the wild-type Arf allele is commonly inactivated, thus canceling selective pressure for p53 mutations. Arf–/– Eµ-Myc mice are even more prone to lymphoma development and die of aggressive lympholeukemias by only 4 to 7 weeks of age. Although the evidence that Arf acts as a tumor suppressor gene in this model is unequivocal, no longitudinal study of Arf regulation has yet been undertaken. Aided by use of a high-affinity monoclonal antibody to p19Arf and a knock-in Arf-Gfp reporter mouse,10,11 we have now evaluated the response of Arf throughout the course of lymphoma development in Eµ-Myc mice.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 References
 
Work with mice has been approved by the St Jude Children's Research Hospital Animal Care and Use Committee under Animal Protocol no. 225 (function of INK4a/ARF in pediatric neoplasia). A purified monoclonal antibody (5-C3-1) directed to mouse p19Arf, which is 25-fold more sensitive than previously derived reagents,10 was conjugated to AlexaFluor-647 and used to score Arf expression in fixed B lymphoid cells by fluorescence-activated flow cytometry (FC). All other procedures for analysis of B cells from Eµ-Myc mice of various Arf genotypes have been described in detail.4,11,12


    Results and discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 References
 
Spleen and bone marrow cells were harvested from groups of overtly healthy Eµ-Myc and nontransgenic control mice of various ages, and B lineage cells, isolated using magnetic beads coated with the B220 antibody to CD45R, were lysed and immunoblotted using the monoclonal antibody (mAb) 5-C3-1 to p19Arf. Low levels of p19Arf were detected in B220+ cells from Eµ-Myc (M) but not control (Con) mice of 2 weeks of age and did not increase thereafter as long as disease was latent (Figure 1A). The p53 protein and p21Cip1, a p53-responsive gene product, were also weakly induced, compared with more robust p53 induction in Arf-null B cells exposed to ionizing radiation (lane 2 vs lane 1). The levels of p19Arf expressed were about 20-fold less than those observed in p53-null lymphomas, in which Arf is induced to high levels but is without effect,4 and at least 200-fold less than those in cultured, immortalized p53-null B cells (Figure 1A, lane 3; Figure 1B). Dual-color FC analysis performed on gated B220+ cells using the mAb 5-C3-1 conjugated to AlexaFluor-647 revealed that the entire population of prelymphomatous B cells exhibited modestly increased fluorescence (Figure 1C). Given that Arf inactivation greatly accelerates lymphomagenesis,46,11 these very low levels of p19Arf and p53 expressed throughout the B220+ population must contribute to tumor suppression. However, protection is by no means absolute because the proliferative fraction of B cells in the spleen and bone marrow is significantly increased in the presence of Eµ-Myc,8,12 and all such animals ultimately develop lymphomas.


Figure 1
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Arf induction in prelymphomatous Eµ-Myc mice. (A) B220+ cells were purified from the bone marrow (BM) and spleens (Sp) of nontransgenic control C57BL/6 (Con) mice or from syngeneic animals expressing the Eµ-Myc (M) transgene. Cells were harvested from healthy mice at biweekly (w) intervals after birth. Cell lysates (25 µg protein per lane from B220+ cells purified from BM or Sp) were separated on denaturing gels, and proteins were immunoblotted with antibodies directed to p19Arf (5-C3-1),10 c-Myc (N-262; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), p53 (NCL-p53-505; Novocastra, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom), p21 (F5; Santa Cruz), or beta-actin (A-5441; Sigma, St Louis, MO), as indicated at the left of the panels. Cultured Arf-null B cells were untreated (lane 1) or irradiated with 5 Gy 2 hours prior to lysis (lane 2) to induce higher levels of p53. Cultured p53-null B cells express very high levels of p19Arf (lane 3). (B) Lysates (in micrograms of total protein as indicated at the bottom of the panel) of B220+ BM cells and splenocytes (Sp) purified from control (Con) or Eµ-Myc (M) transgenic mice were immunoblotted with antibodies to p19Arf. The signals were compared with those generated with various quantities of lysate protein obtained from a representative p53-null lymphoma and from cultured p53-null B cells. (C) Cultured B cells from p53-null mice were stained with an isotype-matched control mAb (panel Ci, negative control) or with mAb 5-C3-1 to p19Arf (panel Cii; p53-null cells as positive control) conjugated to AlexaFluor-647. Arf-null cells served as an additional negative control for mAb 5-C3-1 staining (Ciii). BM and Sp cells from control [Myc (–)] or transgenic [Myc (+)] mice of 2 weeks of age were assayed by dual-color FC using antibodies to B220 and to p19Arf (panels Civ-Cix). Gated B220+ cells in BM (Civ-Cvi) and Sp cells (Cvii-Cix) were analyzed for reactivity with AlexaFluor-647–conjugated mAb 5-C3-1 directed to p19Arf. Vertical dashed lines indicate fluorescence intensities in negative control panels (Ci, Civ, Cviii).

 
We next performed longitudinal studies with Arf+/GFP heterozygotes in which one Arf allele has been replaced by a cDNA cassette encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of the Arf promoter.11 The Arf-Gfp allele behaves as a null and accelerates Eµ-Myc–induced lymphomagenesis. Tumors arising in Arf+/GFP mice inactivate the wild-type Arf allele, retain functional p53, and are brightly green fluorescent.

In Eµ-Myc mice, lymphoblastic lymphoma is accompanied by lympholeukemia, so an increase in the peripheral blood white cell count precedes the appearance of clinically palpable tumors. Animals were considered to be in an intermediate phase of disease when their white blood cell counts, monitored weekly, rose to 30 x 109/L (30 000/µL); moribund mice with frank tumor masses were classified as terminal. Expression of GFP and p19Arf in lymphoid organs was monitored throughout.

During the prelymphomatous latent phase, we detected low levels of p19Arf in splenocytes from Eµ-Myc Arf +/GFP mice, but not in nontransgenic control animals (Figure 2A, lanes 1-3). At this time, GFP expression could not be detected by FC or immunoblotting in these same tissues, most likely due to the relatively reduced sensitivities of these assays. However, GFP-positive cells appeared in peripheral blood and accumulated as total white cell counts rose (Figure 2B), implying that at least one additional oncogenic event synergizes with Eµ-Myc to further activate the Arf promoter. In direct contrast to the Arf-Gfp allele, expression of p19Arf protein encoded by the wild-type Arf allele was reduced (Figure 2A, lanes 5, 6, and 8) or completely absent (Figure 2A, lane 4) in splenocytes from Arf+/GFP mice in the intermediate phase of disease and was almost invariably undetectable in 22 mice during their terminal phase (examples in Figure 2A, lanes 9 and 10). Thus, while further Arf induction might transiently enhance tumor suppression during the intermediate phase (as can only be inferred from the behavior of the Arf-Gfp allele), this process must also provide a concomitant selective pressure favoring the outgrowth of lymphoma cells that no longer express the wild-type Arf allele.


Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Analysis of p19Arf and Arf-Gfp reporter expression in Eµ-Myc transgenic mice. (A) Levels of p19Arf were determined in splenocytes from control (lane 1) and Eµ-Myc transgenic animals at the designated stages of disease (lanes 2-10). Cultured Arf-null (lane 11) and p53-null B cells (lane 12) served as controls. Whereas splenocytes from mice in the latent phase do not express GFP, significant proportions of splenocytes (more than 20%) expressed the Arf-Gfp allele at later stages of disease. The overall levels of p19Arf were diminished or absent in 4 of 5 intermediate-phase mice (lanes 4-8) and almost invariably absent in terminal-phase mice (2 examples of 22 mice are shown in lanes 9 and 10). (B) High-level expression of the Arf-Gfp allele was initially detected by FC analysis in a subset of peripheral white blood cells ({blacksquare}) just prior to the development of lympholeukemia, as manifested by white blood cell counts of more than 30 x 109/L (30 000/µL) ({diamondsuit}). Animals that became moribund were killed approximately 2 weeks later ({blacktriangleup}; terminal phase). Error bars indicate SD from the mean. (C) B220+ BM and Sp cells taken during the intermediate phase of disease from Eµ-Myc ArfGFP/GFP mice initially generated a subpopulation of cells that express high levels of the Arf-Gfp allele.

 
In further support of the idea that Arf inactivation is itself insufficient to trigger lymphomagenesis in Eµ-Myc transgenic mice, GFP was not detectably expressed in the lymphoid tissues of 2-week-old Eµ-Myc ArfGFP/GFP homozygous mice that are even more highly tumor-prone. When GFP-positive cells later appeared in their peripheral blood, FC analysis of gated B220+ spleen and bone marrow cells revealed the emergence of subpopulations exhibiting high GFP fluorescence, as would result from an expanding clonal malignancy (Figure 2C). Tumor masses and invasive malignant cells at terminal phase were uniformly and brightly fluorescent.11 In short, cryptic mutations other than Arf loss accompany the conversion of premalignant Eµ-Myc B cells to tumor cells; this precedes robust Arf induction, but also precipitates Arf inactivation.

The nature of these additional mutations remains unknown. Various genetic alterations that attenuate apoptosis have been documented in cultured tumor cells and in bone marrow recovered from Eµ-Myc mice,1317 but this process is difficult to detect in vivo, probably because dying B cells are very rapidly eliminated.18 Activating mutations in Myc itself16 or those affecting other collaborating oncogenes15,17 could well exert similar inductive effects on the Arf promoter.

Together, these findings argue that seemingly negligible levels of p19Arf or p53 observed in incipient tumor cells sustaining initiating oncogenic mutations exert significant tumor-suppressive effects. This may be particularly important in the analysis of human tumor material, where antibodies capable of detecting equally low levels of p14ARF are not yet available and where ARF may therefore not be inferred to play any tumor suppressive role.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank the members of the Sherr-Roussel laboratory for advice and criticism and Richard A. Ashmun for assistance with FC analysis.

This work was supported by Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cancer Center Core Grant CA-21765, and by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities of St Jude Children's Research Hospital. C.J.S. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.


    Footnotes
 
Submitted July 6, 2006; accepted August 18, 2006.

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, September 12, 2006 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-033985

Contributions: D.B. performed the experiments. D.B. and C.J.S. designed the research, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Charles J. Sherr,St Jude Children's Research Hospital, 332 N. Lauderdale, Memphis, TN 38105; e-mail: sherr{at}stjude.org.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 References
 

  1. Ruas M and Peters G. The p16INK4a/CDKN2A tumor suppressor and its relatives. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 1998; 1378:F115–F177.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  2. Sherr CJ and McCormick F. The RB and p53 pathways in cancer. Cancer Cell 2002; 2:103–112.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  3. Lowe SW and Sherr CJ. Tumor suppression by Ink4a-Arf: progress and puzzles. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2003; 13:77–83.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. Eischen CM, Weber JD, Roussel MF, Sherr CJ, Cleveland JL. Disruption of the ARF-Mdm2-p53 tumor suppressor pathway in Myc-induced lymphomagenesis. Genes Dev 1999; 13:2658–2669.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Jacobs JJL, Scheijen B, Vonchen J-W, et al. Bmi-1 collaborates with c-Myc in tumorigenesis by inhibiting c-Myc induced apoptosis via INK4a/ARF. Genes Dev 1999; 13:2678–2690.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Schmitt CA, McCurrach ME, De Stanchina E, Wallace-Brodeur RR, Lowe SW. INK4a/ARF mutations accelerate lymphomagenesis and promote chemoresistance by disabling p53. Genes Dev 1999; 13:2670–2677.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Adams JM, Harris AW, Pinkert CA, et al. The c-myc oncogene driven by immunoglobulin enhancers induces lymphoid malignancy in transgenic mice. Nature 1985; 318:533–538.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  8. Langdon WY, Harris AW, Cory S, Adams JM. The c-myc oncogene perturbs B lymphocyte development in E-mu-myc transgenic mice. Cell 1986; 47:11–18.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  9. Harris AW, Pinkert CA, Crawford M, et al. The E mu-myc transgenic mouse: a model for high incidence spontaneous lymphoma and leukemia of early B cells. J Exp Med 1988; 167:353–371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  10. Bertwistle D, Zindy F, Sherr CJ, Roussel MF. Monoclonal antibodies to the mouse p19Arf tumor suppressor protein. Hybrid Hybridomics 2004; 23:293–300.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  11. Zindy F, Williams RT, Baudino TA, et al. Arf tumor suppressor promoter monitors latent oncogenic signals in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100:15930–15935.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  12. Baudino TA, Maclean KH, Brennan J, et al. Myc-mediated proliferation and lymphomagenesis, but not apoptosis, are compromised by E2f1 loss. Mol Cell 2003; 11:905–914.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  13. Cory S, Vaux DL, Strasser A, Harris AW, Adams JM. Insights from Bcl-2 and Myc: malignancy involves abrogation of apoptosis as well as sustained proliferation. Cancer Res 1999; 59:1685s–1692s.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  14. Eischen CM, Woo D, Roussel MF, Cleveland JL. Apoptosis triggered by Myc-induced suppression of Bcl-X(L) or Bcl-2 is bypassed during lympho magenesis. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:5063–5070.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Nilsson JA and Cleveland JL. Myc pathways provoking cell suicide and cancer. Oncogene 2003; 22:9007–9021.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  16. Hemann MT, Bric A, Teruya-Feldstein J, et al. Evasion of the p53 tumour surveillance network by tumour-derived MYC mutants. Nature 2005; 436:787–789.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  17. Lowe SW, Cepero E, Evan G. Intrinsic tumor suppression. Nature 2004; 432:307–315.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  18. Jacobsen KA, Prasad VS, Sidman CL, Osmond DG. Apoptosis and macrophage-mediated deletion of precursor B cells in the bone marrow of Eµ-myc transgenic mice. Blood 1994; 84:2784–2794.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
N. E. Freeman-Anderson, Y. Zheng, A. C. McCalla-Martin, L. M. Treanor, Y. D. Zhao, P. M. Garfin, T.-C. He, M. N. Mary, J. D. Thornton, C. Anderson, et al.
Expression of the Arf tumor suppressor gene is controlled by Tgf{beta}2 during development
Development, June 15, 2009; 136(12): 2081 - 2089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Gromley, M. L. Churchman, F. Zindy, and C. J. Sherr
Transient expression of the Arf tumor suppressor during male germ cell and eye development in Arf-Cre reporter mice
PNAS, April 14, 2009; 106(15): 6285 - 6290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Z. Li, D. Boone, and S. R. Hann
Nucleophosmin interacts directly with c-Myc and controls c-Myc-induced hyperproliferation and transformation
PNAS, December 2, 2008; 105(48): 18794 - 18799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
J. A. Benanti, M. L. Wang, H. E. Myers, K. L. Robinson, C. Grandori, and D. A. Galloway
Epigenetic Down-Regulation of ARF Expression Is a Selection Step in Immortalization of Human Fibroblasts by c-Myc
Mol. Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 5(11): 1181 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Reimann, C. Loddenkemper, C. Rudolph, I. Schildhauer, B. Teichmann, H. Stein, B. Schlegelberger, B. Dorken, and C. A. Schmitt
The Myc-evoked DNA damage response accounts for treatment resistance in primary lymphomas in vivo
Blood, October 15, 2007; 110(8): 2996 - 3004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2006-07-033985v1
109/2/792    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertwistle, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sherr, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bertwistle, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sherr, C. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neoplasia
Right arrow Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressors
Right arrow Brief Reports
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020