Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 April 2007, Vol. 109, No. 8, pp. 3125-3126.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blanchard, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Corey, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blanchard, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Corey, S. J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Next Article next article arrow

InsideBlood

NEOPLASIA

Comment on Hirbe et al, page 3424

Filgrastim therapy: a bone of contention

Elisabeth G. Blanchard, and Seth J. Corey

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M. D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER

Every therapy comes with a cost, both fiscal and physical. Hirbe and colleagues report in this issue of Blood that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) can promote tumor metastases by enhancing osteoclast function.

Since its approval in 1992 for use of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression, filgrastim has become widely used, with a worldwide market of $3.5 billion. Filgrastim is effective in shortening the length of profound neutropenia in a diverse population of patients being treated with increasingly more myelosuppressive regimens, mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells for autotransplantation or allotransplantation, and protecting children with severe chronic neutropenia. Concerns about the long-term safety of filgrastim have been raised regarding the last group. Children with severe chronic neutropenia are treated to boost their neutrophil counts to a level protective against opportunistic infections. Whereas once these children died from life-threatening infection, they now lead a normal life, albeit one punctuated with near daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim. Reports of an increasing incidence of myelodysplasia or acute myeloid leukemia in children and adolescents with severe chronic neutropenia have raised suspicions of a putative role for filgrastim in enhancing or accelerating leukemogenesis.1,2 In addition, osteoporosis/osteopenia, as defined by abnormal bone densities, was found in half of studied patients.3 Some of the children have benefited from bisphosphonate therapy.4

For patients with myeloid malignancies, the use of filgrastim has been a bone of contention. First identified as an inducer of myeloid leukemia differentiation,5 granulocyte colony-stimulating factor has been used to ameliorate patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing time-intensive induction chemotherapy. Spirited debates arose in myeloid leukemia protocol committees over filgrastim's growth stimulation of acute myeloid leukemia blasts, many of which express the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor. Fortunately, those who were treated with filgrastim to reduce adverse effects of chemotherapy had remission and overall survival rates that were superior to those without treatment.6 Filgrastim has been used in an adult cohort to drive blasts into cell cycle for enhanced cytarabine cytotoxicity. Overall survival was not different between the groups.7 Lack of adverse outcome was also observed in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.8

Many more patients with nonmyeloid cancers today receive filgrastim, but is this practice safe? Breast, colorectal, prostate, and lung cancers frequently metastasize to the bone, causing severe morbidity. Injecting a melanoma and a breast cancer line directly into the bone, Hirbe and colleagues observed greater tumor growth through increased osteoclast and decreased osteoblast activities. Several molecules, including PU.1, RANKL, and M-CSF, directly regulate osteoclastogenesis.9 Since the authors found G-CSF receptors on both osteoclasts and precursor cells, suggesting a direct role for filgrastim (see figure).


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
G-CSF (filgrastim) stimulation in the bone promotes, in concert with M-CSF and RANKL, the expansion and differentiation of macrophages (Ms) to osteoclasts (OCs), increasing osteoclast activity and leading to decreased bone mineral density and increased tumor cell production.

 
Mouse models that have been developed to study metastases have been useful, but in the end, highly passaged cell lines of a particular type in a genetically defined mouse strain cannot mimic the complexity of human cancer. Nonetheless, this study underscores the dynamic relationship between tumor graft and microenvironment, which can be modified by cytokine therapy. Better therapeutic results may arise from greater understanding of the "seed and soil" of cancer metastases. Many factors likely contribute to the declining deaths due to cancer. Filgrastim treatment has become an important part of supportive care that allows patients to tolerate intensive chemotherapy. Investigation into possible secondary effects of this treatment has important clinical implications. To date, increased metastases have not been observed in the clinic.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests. {blacksquare}

REFERENCES

  1. Germeshausen M, Ballmaier M, Welte K. Incidence of CSF3R mutations in severe congenital neutropenia and relevance for leukemogenesis: results of a long-term survey. Blood 2007; 109:93–99.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Rosenberg PS, Alter BP, Bolyard AA, et al. The incidence of leukemia and mortality from sepsis in patients with severe congenital neutropenia receiving long-term G-CSF therapy. Blood 2006; 107:4628–4635.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Dale DC, Cottle TE, Fier CJ, et al. Severe chronic neutropenia: treatment and follow-up of patients in the Severe Chronic Neutropenia International Registry. Am J Hematol 2003; 72:82–93.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. Borzutzky A, Reyes ML, Figueroa V, Garcia C, Cavieres M. Osteoporosis in children with severe congenital neutropenia: bone mineral density and treatment with bisphosphonates. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2006; 28:205–209.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  5. Nicola NA, Begley CG, Metcalf D. Identification of the human analogue of a regulator that induces differentiation in murine leukaemic cells. Nature 1985; 314:625–628.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  6. Alonzo TA, Kobrinsky NL, Aledo A, Lange BJ, Buxton AB, Woods WG. Impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use during induction for acute myelogenous leukemia in children: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2002; 24:627–635.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  7. Lowenberg B, van Putten W, Theobald M, et al. Effect of priming with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the outcome of chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:743–752.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  8. Jadersten M, Montgomery SM, Dybedal I, Porwit-MacDonald A, Hellstrom-Lindberg E. Long-term outcome of treatment of anemia in MDS with erythropoietin and G-CSF. Blood 2005; 106:803–811.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  9. Teitelbaum SL and Ross FP. Genetic regulation of osteoclast development and function. Nat Rev Genet 2003; 4:638–649.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor enhances bone tumor growth in mice in an osteoclast-dependent manner
Angela C. Hirbe, Özge Uluçkan, Elizabeth A. Morgan, Mark C. Eagleton, Julie L. Prior, David Piwnica-Worms, Kathryn Trinkaus, Anthony Apicelli, and Katherine Weilbaecher
Blood 2007 109: 3424-3431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blanchard, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Corey, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blanchard, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Corey, S. J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
Sponsor: Genentech BioOncology and and Biogen Idec
Blood Online is supported in part by
Genentech BioOncology and Biogen Idec
  Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020