Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 1 May 2007, Vol. 109, No. 9, pp. 3614-3615.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stern-Ginossar, N.
Right arrow Articles by Mandelboim, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stern-Ginossar, N.
Right arrow Articles by Mandelboim, O.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

InsideBlood

IMMUNOBIOLOGY

Comment on Nedvetzki et al, page 3776

Control LPS or get killed

Noam Stern-Ginossar, and Ofer Mandelboim

THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY

In this issue of Blood, Nedvetzki and colleagues demonstrate functional crosstalk between NK cells and macrophages; the outcome of these interactions is dependent on the extent of LPS stimulation.

Initially, natural killer (NK) cells were considered to be innate immune effectors capable of eliminating tumors or virus-infected cells. The detection of malignant or virus-infected cells is mediated by a range of different surface NK receptors that either inhibit or activate NK-cell functions.1 Recently, emerging evidence also attributed to NK cells an important function in the initiation and modulation of immune responses.2 In this context, the cellular crosstalk between NK cells and myeloid cells is of considerable interest, as it potentially shapes subsequent immune responses. Several studies have shown evidence for NK-cell–dendritic-cell (DC) crosstalk resulting in activation, cytokine production, NK-cell proliferation, and DC maturation.2 Of interest, in vitro, NK cells also kill autologous immature, but not mature, DCs, and this might maximize the efficiency of antigen presentation.

Nedvetzki and colleagues, in the current issue of Blood, further extend the possible immune-regulatory role of human NK cells by examining their interactions with macrophages. They show, using a series of elegant experiments, that macrophages, via the engagement of 2B4, activate NK-cell proliferation and cytokine secretion and increase NK-cell cytotoxicity against susceptible target cells. On the other hand, the authors demonstrate that NK cells control macrophage activity, by NKG2D-dependent killing of macrophages stimulated by high doses of LPS. In this regard, it will be interesting to test whether other TLR stimulations will induce human NKG2D ligand expression and, consequently, killing by NK cells. Finally, using macrophages or macrophages stimulated with LPS, the authors demonstrate that the distinct functions of NK-cell–macrophage interactions are translated into different structures of immune synapses (see figure).


Figure 1
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Two distinct NK-cell–activating immune synapses. See the complete figure in the article beginning on page3776.

 
Nedvetzki and colleagues demonstrate functional interactions between NK cells and macrophages. Where, in vivo, could such interactions occur? One possible place is the site of inflammation, where cytokines and chemokines produced by resident macrophages or other cell types could attract NK cells. In such a case, the interactions between NK cells and macrophages could prime NK-cell effector functions in the inflamed tissue. It is also possible that macrophages play a role in recruiting NK cells to lymph nodes, as previously demonstrated for DCs.2 Developing in vivo techniques to image NK-cell–macrophage interaction will probably lead to a better understanding of the importance of NK-cell–macrophage crosstalk.

Another issue to consider is when macrophages need to be killed. It is tempting to speculate that NK-cell–mediated killing of macrophages is important during chronic inflammatory reaction when the macrophage activity needs to be stopped, to prevent, for example, septic shock. The macrophage-mediated killing by NK cells might also be important in eliminating macrophages infected with pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In those situations, LPS-induced expression of NK-cell–activating ligands may aid in the elimination of macrophages exposed to, or infected by, the pathogens.

Finally, several reports have recently demonstrated that NK cells, themselves, might also serve as antigen-presenting cells (APCs).3 These observations, together with the results of Nedvetzki and colleagues and the accumulating evidence demonstrating interactions between NK cells and DCs,4 suggest a possible APC network communication. Such a communication might be used, for example, to transfer peptides from one APC to another, for presentation to T cells. It will be interesting to test whether B cells, which can also serve as APCs, might directly interact with NK cells.

Footnotes

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests. {blacksquare}

REFERENCES

  1. Ljunggren HG and Karre K. In search of the 'missing self': MHC molecules and NK cell recognition. Immunol Today 1990; 11:237–244.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  2. Moretta L, Ferlazzo G, Bottino C, et al. Effector and regulatory events during natural killer-dendritic cell interactions. Immunol Rev 2006; 214:219–228.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  3. Spits H and Lanier LL. Natural killer or dendritic: what's in a name? Immunity 2007; 26:11–16.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. Cooper MA, Fehniger TA, Fuchs A, Colonna M, Caligiuri MA. NK cell and DC interactions. Trends Immunol 2004; 25:47–52.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Reciprocal regulation of human natural killer cells and macrophages associated with distinct immune synapses
Shlomo Nedvetzki, Stefanie Sowinski, Robert A. Eagle, James Harris, Frédéric Vély, Daniela Pende, John Trowsdale, Eric Vivier, Siamon Gordon, and Daniel M. Davis
Blood 2007 109: 3776-3785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stern-Ginossar, N.
Right arrow Articles by Mandelboim, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stern-Ginossar, N.
Right arrow Articles by Mandelboim, O.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020