Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 August 2007, Vol. 110, No. 4, pp. 1089.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lillicrap, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lillicrap, D.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

InsideBlood

GENE THERAPY

Comment on Cao et al, page 1132

Inducing Tregs with hepatic gene therapy

David Lillicrap

QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY

The development of a humoral immune response to the transgene product is a potential complication of gene transfer in inherited disease, in which the transgene product may represent a neoantigen. The report of Cao and colleagues in this issue of Blood has documented how adeno-associated viral (AAV)–mediated gene transfer to the liver can suppress this antibody development through the generation of antigen-specific T regulatory cells (Tregs).

The success of gene therapy in the treatment of inherited diseases has been predictably complicated by responses from the host immune system.1 Systemic delivery of therapeutic transgenes by viral vectors may result in humoral and cell-mediated responses to both the vector and the transgene product. These responses adversely influence the potential for vector readministration and the likelihood of achieving success of long-term expression of the transgene product. In addition, the development of antibodies to the transgene product also has the potential of neutralizing the therapeutic benefit derived from the exogenously administered protein. Examples of these immunologic scenarios have now been documented in many preclinical animal studies of gene-transfer replacement strategies, with the lysosomal storage diseases and hemophilias being prime examples.

The development of antibodies to the transgene product appears to be influenced by several factors, including the type of vector, the vector dose, the transgene promoter, and the site of transgene expression.2 In a previous study, this same group had already provided evidence indicating that hepatic gene transfer mediated by an AAV vector could generate tolerance to the factor IX transgene product in a murine model of hemophilia B.3 However, until the current report, the mechanism of this tolerance induction had been unclear.

In these new studies, the authors have first utilized a mouse model in which the animals are transgenic for a T-cell receptor (TCR) specific for a chicken ovalbumin peptide but lack endogenous TCRs due to a knockout of the RAG-2 locus. After delivery of an ova transgene by portal-vein injection of an AAV2 vector, the authors were able to demonstrate induction of ova-specific CD4+CD25+ Tregs (see figure). These cells were first detectable as early as 14 days after vector administration, and continued to increase in number in the thymus and secondary lymphoid organs during the 2 months after gene transfer. The hepatic gene-transfer–induced Tregs expressed FoxP3, GITR, and CTLA4, and suppressed CD4+CD25 cells in a standard in vitro assay.


Figure 1
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Characterization of regulatory CD4+CD25+ cells isolated from AAV-EF1{alpha}-ova–transduced DO11.10-tg RAG-2–/– mice. See the complete figure in the article beginning on page 1132.

 
In subsequent studies of AAV-mediated hepatic factor IX transgene delivery to hemophilia B mice, the authors have used adoptive transfer of CD4+GITR+ cells to demonstrate that these cells can suppress anti–factor IX antibody generation after factor IX immunization. Finally, in vivo depletion of the CD4+CD25+ cells in hepatic gene-transfer–treated mice resulted in the development of an anti–factor IX response in 4 of 5 animals, demonstrating the requirement for Tregs for tolerance induction following this form of gene transfer.

These studies provide the first definitive evidence of antigen-specific Treg generation following hepatic gene transfer. As such, they remind us that while gene-transfer approaches can mediate immunogenic responses in the host, they also have the potential of inducing tolerance to the transgene product.

Footnotes

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author declares no competing financial interests. {blacksquare}

REFERENCES

  1. Brown BD and Lillicrap D. Dangerous liaisons: the role of "danger" signals in the immune response to gene therapy. Blood 2002; 100:1133–1140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Rawle FE, Shi CX, Brown B, et al. Heterogeneity of the immune response to adenovirus-mediated factor VIII gene therapy in different inbred hemophilic mouse strains. J Gene Med 2004; 6:1358–1368.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  3. Mingozzi F, Liu YL, Dobrzynski E, et al. Induction of immune tolerance to coagulation factor IX antigen by in vivo hepatic gene transfer. J. Clin. Invest 2003; 111:1347–1356.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Induction and role of regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells in tolerance to the transgene product following hepatic in vivo gene transfer
Ou Cao, Eric Dobrzynski, Lixin Wang, Sushrusha Nayak, Bethany Mingle, Cox Terhorst, and Roland W. Herzog
Blood 2007 110: 1132-1140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lillicrap, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lillicrap, D.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
Sponsor: Genentech BioOncology and and Biogen Idec
Blood Online is supported in part by
Genentech BioOncology and Biogen Idec
  Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020