Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 September 2007, Vol. 110, No. 6, pp. 2128-2131.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on June 18, 2007; DOI 10.1182/blood-2007-01-069542.


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2007-01-069542v1
110/6/2128    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pine, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sandoval, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pine, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sandoval, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells
Right arrow Neoplasia
Right arrow Gene Expression
Right arrow Brief Reports
Right arrow Clinical Trials and Observations
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

NEOPLASIA

Brief Report

Incidence and clinical implications of GATA1 mutations in newborns with Down syndrome

Sharon R. Pine1, Qianxu Guo1, Changhong Yin1, Somasundaram Jayabose1, Charlotte M. Druschel2, and Claudio Sandoval1

1 Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Maria Fareri Children's Hospital and Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY; 2 Congenital Malformations Registry New York State Department of Health, Troy


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients, materials, and methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
Somatic mutations in the GATA1 gene are present in almost all cases of Down syndrome (DS)–associated acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL) and transient leukemia (TL). An in utero origin of the GATA1 mutation suggests it is an early leukemogenic event. To determine the detectable incidence and clinical relevance of GATA1 mutations in DS newborns, we screened Guthrie cards from 590 DS infants for mutations in the GATA1 gene. Twenty-two (3.8%) of 585 evaluable infants harbored a predicted functional GATA1 mutation; 2 were identified exclusively within intron 1. Hispanic newborns were 2.6 times more likely to have a mutated GATA1 gene than non-Hispanics (P = .02). Two newborns with a GATA1 mutation subsequently developed AMKL, and none of the infants without a functional GATA1 mutation were reported to have developed leukemia. In addition to screening for TL, a GATA1 mutation at birth might serve as a biomarker for an increased risk of DS-related AMKL.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients, materials, and methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
Newborns with Down syndrome (DS) are at an increased risk of being diagnosed with transient leukemia (TL), or transient myeloproliferative disorder, which is characterized by an accumulation of immature clonal megakaryoblasts in the peripheral blood and liver. The disease usually spontaneously resolves within 3 months, although in rare cases it is fatal due to hepatic fibrosis or liver failure.13 Children with DS have a 1 in 500 chance of developing acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL),46 and 19% of DS (or trisomy 21 mosaic) neonates who are diagnosed with TL develop AMKL within 4 years.3,7

Somatic mutations of GATA1 are found in almost all cases of DS or mosaic trisomy 21–associated TL and AMKL.8 GATA1 mutations have not been detected in healthy children without DS, in DS children with other types of leukemia, or in AMKL cells of non-DS/non–trisomy 21 mosaic children, with the exception of a single case of adult AMKL without DS or acquired trisomy 21.8,9 This suggests that GATA1 mutations play an important role in TL and AMKL development in the DS/mosaic trisomy 21 setting. We and others have shown that the GATA1 mutation is cleared after resolution of TL or AMKL,1013 and therefore the GATA1 mutation appears to be restricted to the blast cells. All reported mutations occur in the 5' end of the gene, mostly within exon 2. Mutations either introduce a premature stop codon, a frameshift, or the loss of exon 2 from altered splicing, resulting in the expression of a shortened GATA1 protein, termed GATA1s, that lacks exon 2 and its N-terminal transactivation domain.14

The overall incidence of GATA1 mutations in DS infants and their clinical relevance for predicting development of AMKL is uncertain. GATA1 mutations were detected in 2 of 21 neonatal blood-spot samples from DS children.10 GATA1 mutations were also found at birth in DS infants who later developed AMKL, including cases that did not have diagnosed TL,10 suggesting that either the TL was subclinical or that GATA1 mutations in the absence of TL still participate in leukemia development. To determine the incidence of GATA1 mutations in a large cohort of DS newborns, we screened 590 blood spots from DS neonates. We then examined the association between the GATA1 mutations and risk of developing AMKL in the study population.


    Patients, materials, and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients, materials, and methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
Guthrie cards from 590 DS infants born in New York State between January 1997 and December 1999 were obtained from the New York Congenital Malformation Registry. Infants were matched to the New York State Cancer Registry (Albany, New York State Department of Health). The institutional review boards of New York Medical College, Westchester Medical Center, and the New York State Department of Health approved this project. Informed consent was obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

DNA samples were screened for GATA1 mutations by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and sequencing of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products, as described.11 Sixty samples were randomly chosen and analyzed in an independent assay.

Potential single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were compared with known SNPs.15,16 Potential splicing aberrations were analyzed by using GENSCAN17,18 and NNSPLICE version 0.9.19

Calculations were performed using STATA software v.9.0 (Stata, College Station, TX) using 2-tailed {chi}2 or Fisher exact tests or analysis of variance (ANOVA).


    Results and discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients, materials, and methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
Frequency and spectrum of GATA1 mutations in DS infants

Table 1 summarizes the selected demographic characteristics of the infants. There was a 99.2% completion rate (585 samples) and a 100% concordance rate (3/60 duplicated samples harbored a mutation). Twenty-eight (4.8%) of 585 DS infants had mutations within intron 1 or exon 2 (Table 2). The sensitivity of detection was 5% (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Characteristics of Down syndrome infants and incidence of GATA1 mutations

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Mutation characteristics and cancer outcome in DS neonates with GATA1-mutations

 
Twenty-one GATA1 mutations from 20 patients were within exon 2 and predicted to express only the GATA1s protein starting at codon 84. Two distinct GATA1 mutations were identified in patient 7, confirming previous reports10,21 that multiple independent GATA1 mutations can be simultaneously present. Three additional DS infants (patients [pts] 26-28) harbored synonymous substitutions within exon 2 that did not match currently known polymorphisms.

Interestingly, 5 GATA1 mutations (pts 21-25) were detected within the 3' end of intron 1. One of the mutations (pt 23) matched a known SNP (rs12849226). The mutations in patients 21 and 22 were predicted to abolish the exon 2 splicing site and result in expression of only the GATA1s isoform (Table 2). Functional analysis is required to confirm that the splicing site was abolished. There was no change in the predicted splicing sites for the mutations identified in patients 23 to 25, and those mutations did not match any known polymorphisms. The mutations identified in pts 23 to 28 were likely germ line and nonfunctional, but future studies are necessary for confirmation. In total, a predicted functional GATA1 mutation was identified in 22 (3.8%) of 585 analyzed neonatal blood spots.

Characteristics of DS infants carrying a GATA1 mutation

Because the incidence and frequency of genetic abnormalities in childhood leukemia vary by race and ethnicity, we examined the frequency of GATA1 mutations based on these variables. White individuals had an elevated, nonsignificant risk of having a GATA1 mutation compared with African Americans and Asians. Hispanic infants had a higher incidence of GATA1 mutations compared with non-Hispanics (7.6% and 2.9%, respectively; P = .02). The observation of a higher GATA1 mutation incidence among Hispanics in this study may have occurred by chance; thus, additional studies are required for confirmation. Males had an elevated, nonsignificant risk of having a GATA1 mutation compared with females. There was no difference in the mean age of the mothers of DS newborns with or without a mutated GATA1 sequence.

Concordance of GATA1 mutations in twins

Three sets of twins were revealed after the analyses were completed. Two sets were African-American females who carried wild-type GATA1. The third set, Hispanic males (pts 12 and 13), carried identical GATA1 exon 2 mutations. This finding is consistent with previous reports of the same GATA1 mutation being present in twins with AMKL12,22 and confirms the prenatal origin of GATA1 mutations.

Subsequent leukemia in DS infants

Two of the patients with a known functional GATA1 mutation were reported to subsequently develop leukemia. Patients 10 and 22 were both Hispanic males who developed AMKL at the ages of 11 and 17 months, respectively. The mutation in patient 22 was located within intron 1. Unfortunately, DNA was not available from the time of AMKL diagnosis, so it is unknown if this mutation was present in the AMKL blasts. Of the 563 DS infants who had only a wild-type GATA1 detected, there were no cases of leukemia reported. Based on estimates from migration data from the United States Census Bureau,23 approximately 56 (9.6%) children in our study population moved outside New York State and thus were lost to follow-up of cancer. Because 1 in 500 DS children will develop AMKL, it is possible, but unlikely, that a child in our study population who moved out of New York State developed AMKL.

Technical factors could account for a low frequency of GATA1 mutations in this DS population, such as a sensitivity of 5%, low numbers of cells on the Guthrie cards, and our inability to detect deletions of the entire exon 2 or within exon 3.

The presence of a GATA1 mutation in our cohort of DS newborns conferred an elevated risk of developing AMKL. We propose that GATA1 mutations can serve as an early biomarker for a subgroup of DS children with an increased risk of developing AMKL. Because the samples analyzed in our study were blinded, we were unable to obtain clinical records regarding a TL diagnosis or blood counts. A large prospective DS screening study is needed to make a direct comparison between TL, GATA mutations, and subsequent AMKL development in DS newborns to determine the prognostic usefulness of GATA1 mutations in addition to TL screening.


    Authorship
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients, materials, and methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
Contribution: S.R.P. designed and supervised research and wrote the manuscript; Q.G. performed research and analyzed data; C.Y. performed research and analyzed data; S.J. designed research and reviewed the manuscript; C.M.D. contributed patients and data; and C.S. designed and supervised research and reviewed the manuscript.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Sharon R. Pine, Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Building 37, Room 3060, 37 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-4255; e-mail: pines{at}mail.nih.gov; or Claudio Sandoval, Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, New York Medical College, Munger Pavilion, Room 110, Valhalla, NY 10595; e-mail: claudio_sandoval{at}nymc.edu.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are in debt to Amy R. Kahn and Maria J. Schymura from the New York State Cancer Registry who provided cancer incidence records for the DS newborns. We are also grateful to Dr Alvin Zipursky and Dr John D. Crispino, who kindly offered advice during the preparation of the manuscript.

This work was supported by the Children's Cancer Fund (Millwood, NY).


    Footnotes
 
Submitted January 24, 2007; accepted June 10, 2007.

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, June 18, 2007 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-01-069542

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients, materials, and methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 

  1. Zipursky A, Brown E, Christensen H, Sutherland R, Doyle J. Leukemia and/or myeloproliferative syndrome in neonates with Down syndrome. Semin Perinatol 1997; 21:97–101.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  2. Al-Kasim F, Doyle JJ, Massey GV, Weinstein HJ, Zipursky A. Incidence and treatment of potentially lethal diseases in transient leukemia of Down syndrome: Pediatric Oncology Group Study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2002; 24:9–13.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  3. Massey GV, Zipursky A, Chang MN, et al. A prospective study of the natural history of transient leukemia (TL) in neonates with Down syndrome (DS): Children's Oncology Group (COG) study POG-9481. Blood 2006; 107:4606–4613.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Lange BJ, Kobrinsky N, Barnard DR, et al. Distinctive demography, biology, and outcome of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome in children with Down syndrome: Children's Cancer Group Studies 2861 and 2891. Blood 1998; 91:608–615.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Ross JA, Spector LG, Robison LL, Olshan AF. Epidemiology of leukemia in children with Down syndrome. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2005; 44:8–12.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  6. Zipursky A, Poon A, Doyle J. Leukemia in Down syndrome: a review. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1992; 9:139–149.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  7. Sandoval C, Pine SR, Guo Q, et al. Tetrasomy 21 transient leukemia with a GATA1 mutation in a phenotypically normal trisomy 21 mosaic infant: case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2005; 44:85–91.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  8. Vyas P and Crispino JD. Molecular insights into Down syndrome-associated leukemia. Curr Opin Peart 2007; 19:9–14.

  9. Harigae H, Xu G, Sugawara T, et al. The GATA1 mutation in an adult patient with acute megakaryoblastic leukemia not accompanying Down syndrome. Blood 2004; 103:3242–3243.[Free Full Text]

  10. Ahmed M, Sternberg A, Hall G, et al. Natural history of GATA1 mutations in Down syndrome. Blood 2004; 103:2480–2489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Pine SR, Guo Q, Yin C, et al. GATA1 as a new target to detect minimal residual disease in both transient leukemia and megakaryoblastic leukemia of Down syndrome. Leuk Res 2005; 29:1353–1356.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  12. Rainis L, Bercovich D, Strehl S, et al. Mutations in exon 2 of GATA1 are early events in megakaryocytic malignancies associated with trisomy 21. Blood 2003; 102:981–986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  13. Groet J, McElwaine S, Spinelli M, et al. Acquired mutations in GATA1 in neonates with Down's syndrome with transient myeloid disorder. Lancet 2003; 361:1617–1620.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  14. Crispino JD. GATA1 mutations in Down syndrome: implications for biology and diagnosis of children with transient myeloproliferative disorder and acute megakaryoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2005; 44:40–44.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  15. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Single Nucleotide Polymorphism. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim Accessed December 4, 2006.

  16. International HapMap Project. http://snp.cshl.org Accessed December 4, 2006.

  17. Burge C. GENSCAN http://genes.mit.edu/GENSCAN.html Accessed January 15, 2007.

  18. Burge C and Karlin S. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J Mol Biol 1997; 268:78–94.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  19. Reese MG. Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project. Splice Site Prediction by Neural Network. http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/splice.html Accessed January 15, 2007.

  20. den Dunnen JT and Antonarakis SE. Human Genome Variation Society. Nomenclature for the description of sequence variations. http://hgvs.org/mutnomen Accessed January 15, 2007.

  21. Groet J, Mulligan C, Spinelli M, et al. Independent clones at separable stages of differentiation, bearing different GATA1 mutations, in the same TMD patient with Down syndrome. Blood 2005; 106:1887–1888.[Free Full Text]

  22. Shimada A, Xu G, Toki T, et al. Fetal origin of the GATA1 mutation in identical twins with transient myeloproliferative disorder and acute megakaryoblastic leukemia accompanying Down syndrome. Blood 2004; 103:366.[Free Full Text]

  23. U.S. Census Bureau. Geographical Mobility/Migration. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/migrate.html Accessed April 23, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
A. C. Xavier, Y. Ge, and J. W. Taub
Down Syndrome and Malignancies: A Unique Clinical Relationship: A Paper from the 2008 William Beaumont Hospital Symposium on Molecular Pathology
J. Mol. Diagn., September 1, 2009; 11(5): 371 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. J. Stankiewicz and J. D. Crispino
ETS2 and ERG promote megakaryopoiesis and synergize with alterations in GATA-1 to immortalize hematopoietic progenitor cells
Blood, April 2, 2009; 113(14): 3337 - 3347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Malinge, S. Izraeli, and J. D. Crispino
Insights into the manifestations, outcomes, and mechanisms of leukemogenesis in Down syndrome
Blood, March 19, 2009; 113(12): 2619 - 2628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
O. Tunstall-Pedoe, A. Roy, A. Karadimitris, J. de la Fuente, N. M. Fisk, P. Bennett, A. Norton, P. Vyas, and I. Roberts
Abnormalities in the myeloid progenitor compartment in Down syndrome fetal liver precede acquisition of GATA1 mutations
Blood, December 1, 2008; 112(12): 4507 - 4511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. T. Chou, J. B. Opalinska, Y. Yao, M. A. Fernandes, A. Kalota, J. S. J. Brooks, J. K. Choi, A. M. Gewirtz, G.-a. Danet-Desnoyers, R. L. Nemiroff, et al.
Trisomy 21 enhances human fetal erythro-megakaryocytic development
Blood, December 1, 2008; 112(12): 4503 - 4506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J.-H. Klusmann, U. Creutzig, M. Zimmermann, M. Dworzak, N. Jorch, C. Langebrake, A. Pekrun, K. Macakova-Reinhardt, and D. Reinhardt
Treatment and prognostic impact of transient leukemia in neonates with Down syndrome
Blood, March 15, 2008; 111(6): 2991 - 2998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2007-01-069542v1
110/6/2128    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pine, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sandoval, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pine, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sandoval, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells
Right arrow Neoplasia
Right arrow Gene Expression
Right arrow Brief Reports
Right arrow Clinical Trials and Observations
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020