Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 1 June 2008, Vol. 111, No. 11, pp. 5268.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, T. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

InsideBlood

CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS

Comment on Ferrajoli et al, page 5291

Lenalidomide: what is the right dose in CLL?

Thomas S. Lin

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

Ferrajoli and colleagues present the results of a phase 2 study in which lenalidomide was administered by continuous daily dosing to 44 patients with relapsed CLL. Clinical activity (ORR 32%, CR 7%) was observed, and responses were seen in patients with poor-risk cytogenetic abnormalities and unmutated IgVH. However, the mechanism(s) of action and the optimal dosing schedule of lenalidomide remain undefined.

The immunomodulating drug lenalidomide is approved for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM)1 and 5q- myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).2 However, its mechanism of action remains unclear and may be disease specific. The maximal tolerated dose was 25 mg daily in MM,1 but 10 mg daily was as effective as, and caused less hematologic toxi-city than, 25 mg daily in MDS.2 Thus, lenalidomide's tolerability and optimal dose, like its mechanism of action, may be disease specific.

Chanan-Khan and colleagues administered lenalidomide at a dose of 25 mg daily on days 1 to 21 every 28 days to 45 patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).3 Lenalidomide was active (overall response rate [ORR] 47%, complete remission [CR] 9%), although hematologic toxicity at grades 3 and 4 was significant, and 2 patients developed tumor lysis syndrome. Furthermore, 58% of patients experienced a unique tumor flare reaction, occurring within 24 hours of the first dose and lasting a median of 14 days, which was not observed in MM or MDS.

In this issue of Blood, Ferrajoli and colleagues present the results of a phase 2 study in which lenalidomide was administered at 10 mg per day by continuous daily dosing to 44 patients with relapsed CLL. The dose could be escalated 5 mg every 28 days up to 25 mg daily, but significant hematologic toxicity resulted in 10 mg being the median delivered dose. The authors observed an ORR of 32% (CR 7%), with activity apparent in patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (ORR 31%) and unmutated IgVH (ORR 25%), although 6 to 9 months were needed to achieve optimal response. In contrast to agents such as fludarabine and alemtuzumab, lenalidomide caused no reduction in T-cell counts, although 1 patient died of pneumonia and 1 patient died of mucormycosis during cycle 1, perhaps due to prior immunosuppression.

Thirteen patients (30%) developed tumor flare reactions, which were treated with a 6-day solumedrol pack; lymph node size greater than 5 cm was the only identified risk factor. Clinical response did not depend upon development of tumor flare. In contrast to its ability to reduce IL-6 production in MM,4 which may be critical to its activity in that disease, lenalidomide did not reduce IL-6 levels in responding CLL patients, and actually induced a dramatic increase in IL-6 in nonresponders. No significant change in TNF-{alpha} was observed with therapy, although responders had a mean baseline TNF-{alpha} level twice that of nonresponders. The correlative study discussed by Ferrajoli et al suggests an immunostimulatory effect, although lenalidomide's mechanism of action in CLL remains unclear.

The article by Ferrajoli and colleagues indicates that continuous low-dose lenalidomide may be as effective as an interrupted schedule using higher doses. At 5 mg daily, 3 of 11 patients responded, and a CR was observed at 10 mg daily. However, this study also illustrates the toxicity of lenalidomide in heavily treated, relapsed CLL patients. Despite a median dose of 10 mg daily, significant hematologic toxicity was observed, and 30% of patients developed tumor flare reactions. Although lenalidomide appears to exert an immunostimulatory effect, its mechanism of action in CLL remains unclear and requires further investigation. Although lenalidomide is clearly active in CLL, more clinical studies are needed to define the optimal dosing schedule and confirm the safety of lenalidomide in treating this malignancy.

Footnotes

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author has served on advisory boards for Celgene, which produces and licenses lenalidomide (Revlimid). {blacksquare}

REFERENCES

  1. Richardson PG, Schlossman RL, Weller E, et al. Immunomodulatory drug CC-5013 overcomes drug resistance and is well tolerated in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2002;100:3063–3067.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. List A, Dewald G, Bennett J, et al. Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromsome 5q deletion. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1456–1465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Chanan-Khan A, Miller KC, Musial L, et al. Clinical efficacy of lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results of a phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5343–5349.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Anderson KC. Lenalidomide and thalidomide: Mechanisms of action—similarities and differences. Semin Hematol. 2005;42(4, Suppl 4):S3–S8.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Lenalidomide induces complete and partial remissions in patients with relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Alessandra Ferrajoli, Bang-Ning Lee, Ellen J. Schlette, Susan M. O'Brien, Hui Gao, Sijin Wen, William G. Wierda, Zeev Estrov, Stefan Faderl, Evan N. Cohen, Changping Li, James M. Reuben, and Michael J. Keating
Blood 2008 111: 5291-5297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, T. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020