Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 June 2008, Vol. 111, No. 12, pp. 5755.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldstone, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rowe, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goldstone, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rowe, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

CORRESPONDENCE

Response: Chemotherapy or allografting for young adults with high-risk ALL?

We thank the correspondent and agree that the issue is important. We enclose Table 1 of survival at 5 years in the subgroups requested by the correspondent, where standard risk (SR) and high risk (HR) refer to white cell count and lineage only.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Five-year survival by age and risk group

 
The donor benefit is greater in young than old and in standard risk than in high risk. It may also be true that there is no benefit in the older high-risk patient. However, the differences in the magnitude of the donor versus no-donor effect in these subgroups are not statistically significant and could be due to chance. In particular, we do not see a difference by risk group in the older no-donor patient group. In summary, the subgroup analysis is consistent with the risk ratio being the same in all risk groups, but there are insufficient data to rule out a difference.

It is important to recall that the difference in survival benefits between younger (< 35 years) and older (> 35 years) patients who did and did not have a donor was related to increased treatment-related mortality (TRM). There was still a donor-attributable reduction in relapse risk for both groups but this did not translate into survival benefit due to increased TRM. Age over 35 years is the only factor that could be statistically shown to be independently responsible for the increased TRM in the high-risk group of patients. Thus, we would certainly recommend an allogeneic transplant for patients younger than 35, even with a high blast count.

This trial has taken 13 years to accrue the largest number of patients ever reported in a single study in adult ALL and yet the question posited by the correspondent still cannot be answered with certainty. It is now clear that only a meta-analysis will supply the appropriate statistical rigor to address this question. S.M.R. (one of the authors of this letter) is coordinating a meta-analysis at the Cancer Trials Support Unit (CTSU) in Oxford and the author of the letter and any other interested parties are invited to submit data to attempt to answer this and other important questions, which may otherwise go unaddressed. The fact that cytogenetic1 and molecular markers, as in AML, are likely to supersede high blast count, lineage, and age as the discriminating prognostic factors for relapse only adds complexity to the issue.


    Authorship
 Top
 Authorship
 Reference
 
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Anthony H. Goldstone, University College London Hospital (UCLH), 25 Grafton Way, Rosenheim Building, 6th Floor, London, United Kingdom WC1E 6DB; e-mail: anthony.goldstone{at}uclh.nhs.uk.

Anthony H. Goldstone, Susan M. Richards, Adele K. Fielding, and Jacob M. Rowe


    Reference
 Top
 Authorship
 Reference
 

  1. Moorman AV, Harrison CJ, Buck GA, et al. Karyotype is an independent prognostic factor in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL): analysis of cytogenetic data from patients treated on the Medical Research Council (MRC) UKALLXII/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2993 trial. Blood. 2007;109:3189–3197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Chemotherapy or allografting for young adults with high-risk ALL?
Claudio Anasetti
Blood 2008 111: 5755. [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldstone, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rowe, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goldstone, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rowe, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020