Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 February 2008, Vol. 111, No. 4, pp. 2385-2387.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on December 12, 2007; DOI 10.1182/blood-2007-10-117010.


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Appendix
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2007-10-117010v1
111/4/2385    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Determann, O.
Right arrow Articles by Klapper, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Determann, O.
Right arrow Articles by Klapper, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neoplasia
Right arrow Brief Reports
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

NEOPLASIA

Brief Report

Ki-67 predicts outcome in advanced-stage mantle cell lymphoma patients treated with anti-CD20 immunochemotherapy: results from randomized trials of the European MCL Network and the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group

Olaf Determann1, Eva Hoster2, German Ott3,4, Heinz Wolfram Bernd5, Christoph Loddenkemper6, Martin Leo Hansmann7, Thomas E. F. Barth8, Michael Unterhalt2, Wolfgang Hiddemann2, Martin Dreyling2, Wolfram Klapper1, for the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network and the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group

1 Department of Pathology, Hematopathology Section and Lymph Node Registry, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel; 2 Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Munich; 3 Department of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg; 4 Department of Clinical Pathology, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart; 5 Department of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck; 6 Department of Pathology, University Hospital Charité, Campus Benjamin-Franklin, Berlin; 7 Department of Pathology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt; and 8 Department of Pathology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
Clinical outcome of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is highly heterogeneous. Tumor cell proliferation as assessed by the Ki-67 index has been shown to yield prognostic information on MCL in many studies using heterogeneously treated patient cohorts. The prognostic value of the Ki-67 index in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy has not been studied so far. We analyzed the Ki-67 index at primary diagnosis in 249 advanced-stage MCL patients treated within randomized trials. Ki-67 showed high prognostic relevance for overall survival (relative risk 1.27 for 10% higher Ki-67, P < .001), also independently from clinical prognostic factors. The 3 groups with different Ki-67 index of less than 10%, 10% to less than 30%, and 30% or more showed significantly different overall survival in patients treated with CHOP (P = .001) as well as in patients treated with CHOP in combination with anti-CD20 therapy (R-CHOP, P = .013). Thus, the Ki-67 index remains an important prognostic marker in the era of anti-CD20 therapy. The Euro-pean MCL study is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT00016887 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) with a median overall survival (OS) of the patients of 3 to 5 years.1 Clinical outcome of this disease is highly heterogeneous.2 Since MCL patients often present at an advanced age and treatment strategies differ in terms of their potential side effects, several attempts have been made to identify high- and low-risk patients for a risk-adapted therapy.25 In contrast to many other B-NHLs, increased proliferation of the tumor cells has been shown to be distinctly correlated with shorter survival in MCL. Thus, the proliferation index as assessed by the percentage of Ki-67 positive cells represents an important prognostic marker in several studies.2,6,7 However, the studies published so far aiming at the prognostic value of Ki-67 analyzed patients with heterogeneous therapeutic regimens that were not treated within prospective randomized trials.2,6,7 The addition of anti-CD20 (rituximab) to the chemotherapy protocols improved the outcome and might have changed the risk-factor profile of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). Thus, BCL2 expression, a marker for unfavorable outcome in DLBCL, might lose its predictive value in DLBCL patients treated with rituximab.8 The introduction of rituximab into the treatment protocols for MCL has improved the outcome substantially.9 However, to date it is uncertain, whether proliferation can predict outcome in MCL treated with rituximab. We studied the tumor-cell proliferation rate in 249 newly diagnosed patients with advanced-stage MCL treated within the randomized trials of the European MCL Network and the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG; a list of the members of the study group is available as Document S1 on the Blood website; see the Supplemental Materials link at the top of the online article).


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
Patients

Local ethics committees of the participating centers approved the study protocol, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patient specimens were collected from 3 randomized trials of the GLSG9,10 and the European MCL Network.11 One hundred sixteen patients in our cohort received CHOP therapy and 96 patients received CHOP in combination with rituximab (R-CHOP). An additional 37 patients received mitoxantrone, chlorambucil, and prednisone (MCP) without rituximab.

Ki-67 index

Specimens were analyzed in agreement with the local ethical guidelines as well as the approved study protocols. Staining for Ki-67 was done on lymph node biopsies using the antibody Mib-1 or Ki-S5 as described before.2 The proliferation index (percentage of Ki-67 positive lymphoma cells) was assessed by counting 1000 cells in at least 2 representative areas of the lymphoma and the average of both values was used for further analysis.

Statistical methods

The outcome parameter was OS calculated from the day of trial recruitment to death from any cause or the latest follow-up date. The prognostic relevance of Ki-67 as continuous parameter was tested by univariate Cox regression in the entire cohort and then adjusted for the MCC International Prognostic Index (MIPI) prognostic score12 using multiple Cox regression. If Ki-67 was identified as independent prognostic factor, 2 optimal cut-off points were searched maximizing the log-rank statistic for OS and defining 3 reasonably sized risk groups. The candidate cut-off points were 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%. Using the identified cut-off points we then calculated Kaplan-Meier plots and performed log-rank tests for the subgroups of CHOP– and R-CHOP–treated patients separately. In addition, for each subcohort we adjusted the statistical significance of the categorized Ki-67 index for the MIPI prognostic score12 using the likelihood ratio test in multiple Cox regression.


    Results and discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
As a continuous parameter, Ki-67 showed strong prognostic relevance for OS with a relative risk (RR) of 1.27 for 10% higher Ki-67 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.39, P < .001) in the entire cohort. This was also true independently from the MIPI prognostic score12 (adjusted RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.33, P = .001). All combinations of 2 cut-off points yielded significantly different OS curves. Taking group size into account, the combination of 10% and 30% showed the highest statistical significance (log rank-{chi}2 32.70, P < .001) with 32%, 52%, and 16% of the patients having a Ki-67 index less than 10%, 10% to less than 30%, and 30% or more.

The statistically significant difference in OS between the groups of less than 10%, 10% to less than 30%, and 30% or higher Ki-67 index was also seen in the subgroups of CHOP– (median OS 112, 59, and 30 months, 3 years OS 81%, 75%, 46%, P = .001) and R-CHOP–treated patients (median OS not reached, not reached, 52 months, 3 years OS 93%, 74%, and 66%, P = .013 for R-CHOP, Figure 1). After adjusting for the MIPI score12 the P values were .003 for CHOP- and .14 for R-CHOP–treated patients. The median follow-up was 63 for CHOP– and 39 months for R-CHOP–treated patients, respectively. The follow-up in the R-CHOP–treated cohort was shorter because randomization between CHOP and R-CHOP was started in 2000,9 whereas in the preceding trial CHOP was randomly compared with MCP.10 However, the cohort of CHOP and R-CHOP patients did not differ in respect to clinical parameters like age, stage, lactate dehydrogenase, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, or bone marrow involvement (data not shown).


Figure 1
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier plot for overall survival of patients treated with CHOP (A) and R-CHOP (B) stratified in 3 groups according to the Ki-67 index of less than 10% (< 10), 10% to less than 30% (≥10), and 30% or more (≥30) Ki-67 positive cells.

 
We have recently shown that Ki-67 index shows strong prognostic relevance in combination with the clinical prognostic index for advanced stage MCL.12 The data presented herein indicate that the Ki-67 index might be a valuable prognostic parameter for MCL patients treated with immunochemotherapy including rituximab. However, compared with CHOP therapy, R-CHOP immunochemotherapy improves response and time to treatment failure of MCL but does not improve OS in our cohort (data not shown) and the randomized comparison.9 Therefore, the prognostic value of the Ki-67 index has to be validated in treatment protocols that improve OS of MCL patients.

In contrast to polymerase chain reaction– or array-based techniques for prediction of prognosis, the Ki-67 index can be cost-effectively evaluated on paraffin embedded tissue. The Ki-67 index thus might be the first biologic parameter that can be included for further risk stratification of MCL. However, standardized methods and guidelines to assess Ki-67 in MCL are needed for future use.


    Authorship
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
Contribution: O.D., G.O., H.W.B., C.L., M.L.H., T.E.F.B., and W.K. generated data; E.H. and M.U. analyzed data; W.H. and M.D. provided data and administrative support; and W.K. and E.H. designed the study and wrote the manuscript.

A list of the participants in the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group and the European MCL Network can be found on the Blood website; see the Supplemental Materials link at the top of the online article.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Wolfram Klapper, Department of Pathology, Hematopathology Section, Niemannsweg 11, 24105 Kiel, Germany; e-mail: wklapper{at}path.uni-kiel.de.


    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network (No. LSHC-CT-2004-503351).


    Footnotes
 
Submitted October 5, 2007; accepted November 30, 2007.

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, December 5, 2007 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-117010

The online version of this article contains a data supplement.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 

  1. Jaffe E, Harris N, Stein H, Vardiman JW. Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoetic and lymphoid tissues. 2001;Lyon, France IARC Press.

  2. Tiemann M, Schrader C, Klapper W, et al. Histopathology, cell proliferation indices and clinical outcome in 304 patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): a clinicopathological study from the European MCL Network. Br J Haematol 2005; 131:29–38.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  3. Rosenwald A, Wright G, Wiestner A, et al. The proliferation gene expression signature is a quantitative integrator of oncogenic events that predicts survival in mantle cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell 2003; 3:185–197.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. Kienle D, Katzenberger T, Ott G, et al. Quantitative gene expression deregulation in mantle-cell lymphoma: correlation with clinical and biologic factors. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:2770–2777.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Salaverria I, Zettl A, Bea S, et al. Specific secondary genetic alterations in mantle cell lymphoma provide prognostic information independent of the gene expression-based proliferation signature. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:1216–1222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Katzenberger T, Petzoldt C, Holler S, et al. The Ki67 proliferation index is a quantitative indicator of clinical risk in mantle cell lymphoma. Blood 2006; 107:3407.[Free Full Text]

  7. Schrader C, Meusers P, Brittinger G, et al. Topoisomerase IIalpha expression in mantle cell lymphoma: a marker of cell proliferation and a prognostic factor for clinical outcome. Leukemia 2004; 18:1200–1206.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  8. Mounier N, Briere J, Gisselbrecht C, et al. Rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP) overcomes bcl-2–associated resistance to chemotherapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Blood 2003; 101:4279–4284.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  9. Lenz G, Dreyling M, Hoster E, et al. Immunochemotherapy with rituximab and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone significantly improves response and time to treatment failure, but not long-term outcome in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial of the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG). J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:1984–1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  10. Nickenig C, Dreyling M, Hoster E, et al. Combined cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisone (CHOP) improves response rates but not survival and has lower hematologic toxicity compared with combined mitoxantrone, chlorambucil, and prednisone (MCP) in follicular and mantle cell lymphomas: results of a prospective randomized trial of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group. Cancer 2006; 107:1014–1022.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  11. Dreyling M, Lenz G, Hoster E, et al. Early consolidation by myeloablative radiochemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in first remission significantly prolongs progression-free survival in mantle-cell lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial of the European MCL Network. Blood 2005; 105:2677–2684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  12. Hoster E, Dreyling M, Klapper W, et al. A new prognostic index (MIPI) for patients with advanced-stage mantle cell lymphoma. Blood 2008; 111:558–565.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Clin PatholHome page
J. Gao, L. Peterson, B. Nelson, C. Goolsby, and Y.-H. Chen
Immunophenotypic Variations in Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Am J Clin Pathol, November 1, 2009; 132(5): 699 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
haematolHome page
S. A. Pileri and B. Falini
Mantle cell lymphoma
Haematologica, November 1, 2009; 94(11): 1488 - 1492.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Ghielmini and E. Zucca
How I treat mantle cell lymphoma
Blood, August 20, 2009; 114(8): 1469 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. Martin, A. Chadburn, P. Christos, K. Weil, R. R. Furman, J. Ruan, R. Elstrom, R. Niesvizky, S. Ely, M. DiLiberto, et al.
Outcome of Deferred Initial Therapy in Mantle-Cell Lymphoma
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2009; 27(8): 1209 - 1213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. H. Geisler, A. Kolstad, A. Laurell, N. S. Andersen, L. B. Pedersen, M. Jerkeman, M. Eriksson, M. Nordstrom, E. Kimby, A. M. Boesen, et al.
Long-term progression-free survival of mantle cell lymphoma after intensive front-line immunochemotherapy with in vivo-purged stem cell rescue: a nonrandomized phase 2 multicenter study by the Nordic Lymphoma Group
Blood, October 1, 2008; 112(7): 2687 - 2693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Appendix
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2007-10-117010v1
111/4/2385    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Determann, O.
Right arrow Articles by Klapper, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Determann, O.
Right arrow Articles by Klapper, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neoplasia
Right arrow Brief Reports
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020