| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Blood, 1 March 2008, Vol. 111, No. 5, pp. 2495-2496.
Imatinib and the neoplastic bone microenvironmentM. D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER
The effects of aging, medical comorbidity, and systemic therapeutics interplay with the varied and distinctive capacities of neoplasms to usurp the physiological machinery regulating bone structure and function, thus determining skeletal morbidity and related mortality. In this issue of Blood, Fitter and colleagues report frequent increases in trabecular bone volume—a 2-fold increase over baseline in nearly half of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)—treated with the multi–tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor, imatinib mesylate. Although the clinical significance of this anabolic and/or anticatabolic effect remains to be determined, these mechanistic studies offer a plausible explanation for the outcome.
Fitter and colleagues suggest that emerging long-term safety data justify the study of imatinib for disorders associated with bone loss if bone-mass data are confirmed. Concerns raised with respect to the potential cardiotoxicity of imatinib via c-abl inhibition in cardiomyocytes3 will have to be sufficiently dispelled to justify its long-term use in treating nonneoplastic conditions. Engineered variants of imatinib that retain beneficial activity without cardiac effects4 present an interesting alternative. Further studies of imatinib or its variants alone, in combination with, or in sequence with anticatabolic agents such as raloxifene, bisphosphonates, and denusomab, or anabolic agents such as the parathormone fragment teriparetide, may then follow. Might imatinib favorably influence neoplastic bone microenvironments that generate significant skeletal morbidity, unlike CML? There are few observations to this effect in the literature; however, in advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer with osteoblastic bone metastases, potent reduction in a marker of bone resorption (urine N-telopeptide) with a stable or increased marker of bone formation (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) was seen when imatinib was combined with docetaxel.5 These data are in concordance with the inferences from Fitter and colleagues, although no clinical benefit to patients was identified. Tumor resistance may arise from an imatinib-driven tilt in the balance of neoplastic allegiance to osteoblast-generated growth factors rather than from osteoclasts. Studies in pure or dominant-lytic phenotypes of metastatic bone disease may thus be worth exploring; designs that incorporate pharmacodynamic monitoring, bone turnover markers, and skeleton-related endpoints may assist in defining biological subsets that benefit from the addition of imatinib to existing standard therapeutics.
Footnotes
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author declares no competing financial interests.
REFERENCES
Related Article in Blood Online:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||