| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Blood, 1 April 2008, Vol. 111, No. 7, pp. 3562-3570. Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on January 15, 2008; DOI 10.1182/blood-2007-08-107664.
IMMUNOBIOLOGY
Crosstalk between the
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2β1 integrin, a receptor for collagens, laminins, decorin, E-cadherin, matrix metalloproteinase-1, endorepellin, and several viruses, is required for innate immunity and regulation of autoimmune/allergic disorders. We demonstrated that the innate immune response to Listeria monocytogenes required
2β1 integrin expression by peritoneal mast cells (PMCs). Ligation of the
2β1 integrin by C1q contained in immune complexes comprised of Listeria and antibody was required for PMC activation in vitro and in vivo. However, ligation of the
2β1 integrin alone was insufficient to activate cytokine secretion, suggesting that one or more additional signals emanating from a coreceptor were required for PMC activation. Here, we demonstrate that C1q, but neither other complement proteins nor FcR
, is required for early innate immune response to Listeria. The binding of Listeria's Internalin B (InlB) to hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGF-R)/c-met provides the costimulatory function required for PMC activation. Either HGF or Listeria InlB bound to c-met and either C1q or type I collagen bound to
2β1 integrin stimulates PMC activation. These findings suggest that crosstalk between c-met and the
2β1 integrin may contribute to mast-cell activation in autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2β1 integrin in the innate and acquired immune response has been an area of active investigation. We initially reported that the
2β1 integrin-deficient mice exhibited markedly diminished inflammatory responses to Listeria monocytogenes because of a requirement for
2β1 integrin expression on peritoneal mast cells (PMCs) for mast-cell activation and cytokine release in vivo.1 Although the
2β1 integrin serves as a receptor for several matrix and nonmatrix ligands, the ligand for the integrin during the PMC response to infection was unknown.2,3 We demonstrated that C1q complement protein and collectin family members, including mannose binding lectin and surfactant protein A, all served as ligands for the integrin.4 In addition, the
2β1 integrin was required for mast-cell activation in vitro in response to Listeria. However, ligation of the
2β1 integrin alone was insufficient to activate cytokine secretion because mast-cell adhesion to collagen or C1q alone failed to support cytokine secretion.4
We hypothesized that one or more additional signals emanating from an additional receptor was required to activate mast-cell cytokine secretion in response to immune complexes. At that time, we presented 2 alternative models by which
2β1 integrin-ligand interactions may stimulate mast-cell activation and cytokine secretion. Our first model proposed that ligation of the
2β1 integrin simultaneously with a second, costimulatory receptor elicited mast-cell activation, in a manner reminiscent of the role proposed for the
2β1 integrin and the glycoprotein VI/Fc receptor common
chain (FcR
) during platelet adhesion to collagen.5,6 In our second model, binding of the
2β1 integrin to an immune complex containing C1q may directly activate the complement cascade, resulting in the deposition of C3b or iC3b and generation of complement byproducts, such as C3a or C5a, which would subsequently stimulate mast cell activation.7–9
We now report that neither the FcR
nor components of the complement cascade are required in
2β1 integrin-dependent mast-cell activation. Instead, we describe a novel coreceptor required for mast-cell activation, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF-R)/c-met. The Listeria-specific molecule, Internalin B (InlB), binds to its host cell receptor, c-met to mediate internalization into epithelial and hepatic cells.10 We demonstrate that activation of mature PMCs by Listeria plus immune complex requires costimulatory signals from
2β1 integrin ligation to either type I collagen or C1q and c-met binding to either InlB or HGF. The synergistic signals from the 2 coreceptors result in mast-cell activation and the release of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) that induce the early innate immune responses to L monocytogenes.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 integrin-subunit (
2–/–), FcR
(FcR
–/–), C1q (C1q–/–)-deficient mice, and WT (WT) littermate controls on a C57BL/6 x 129/Sv background were used at 6 to 20 weeks of age. FcR
-deficient mice were obtained from Dr Paul Allen (Washington University School of Medicine). C1q-deficient mice, originally generated by Drs Walport and Botto, were obtained on a pure C57BL/6 background from Drs Michael Diamond (Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO) and Gregory L. Stahl (Harvard University School of Medicine, Boston, MA).11 Mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions in the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine (Nashville, TN) mouse facilities. Within individual experiments, mice were age and sex matched. Wild-type Listeria (EGD) and its isogenic mutants,
InlA and
InlB (provided by Dr E. Unanue from Washington University, St Louis, MO), were cultured in brain heart infusion broth (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) at 37°C.
Mast-cell preparation
PMCs were isolated from resident peritoneal exudates using Percoll gradient centrifugation (
85% purity).1 Expression of c-kit,
2β1 integrin, or c-met was carried out by flow cytometric analysis using the following antibodies (all from BD Biosciences): fluorescein isothiocyanate-anti-CD117 (c-kit; 2B8), phycoerythrin–anti-CD49b (integrin subunit; HM
2).
In vitro adhesion and activation assays
Adhesion assays were performed as previously described.4 Static adhesion assays were performed in 96-well plates (Immulon 2HB; Thermo Electron, Waltham, MA).12,13 Wells were coated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) (5 µg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), type 1 collagen (25 µg/mL rat tail; BD Biosciences), human C1q (25 µg/mL; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), a matrix of L monocytogenes, anti-Listeria antibody, and serum, or a matrix of BSA, anti-BSA, and serum. The Listeria or BSA matrix was formed by allowing Listeria (strain EGD, 108 organisms/mL in 0.1 M carbonate buffer, pH 8.5) or BSA (5 µg/mL in phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]) to adhere to wells of a 96-well plate overnight. Unattached Listeria or BSA was removed and polyclonal anti-Listeria antibody (1:200 dilution in PBS; Difco, Detroit, MI) or anti-BSA antibody (1:1000 dilution in PBS; Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) was added and incubated at 37°C for 1 hour. Fresh mouse serum from WT, C1q–/–, C3–/–, C4–/–, C5–/– or factor B–/– mice (sera from C3–/–, C4–/–, C5–/–, and factor B–/– kindly provided by Michael Diamond, Washington University, St Louis, MO, 50%) was added for 1 hour at 37°C. PMCs (2000 cells/well) were allowed to adhere for 1 hour at 37°C in the presence of 2 mM MgCl2 or 2 mM EDTA. Nonadherent cells were removed and adherent cells were quantitated as previously described.13
For in vitro mast-cell activation by Listeria, purified PMCs (5 x 104 cells/well) were incubated for 1 hour at 37°C with a washed suspension of Listeria (107 organisms), incubated with rabbit anti-Listeria antibody, and 50% serum from either WT, C1q–/–, C3–/–, C4–/–, C5–/–, or factor B–/– mice. For in vitro mast-cell activation by BSA immune complexes, purified PMCs (5 x 104 cells/well) were incubated with a washed suspension of latex beads (Polysciences, Warrington, PA) coated with BSA (3 mg/mL), anti-BSA antibody, and serum (50%) alone or in the presence of lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 100 ng/mL, Sigma-Aldrich), Pam3Cys-Ser-(Lys)4 x 3HCl (Pam3Cys, 100 ng/mL, EMC Microcollections, Tuebingen, Germany), Listeria (108), heat-killed L monocytogenes (108 heated for 30 minutes at 60°C), or HGF (2 mg/mL, R&D Systems Minneapolis, MN). Anti–c-met antibody was obtained from R&D Systems. Supernatants were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for IL-6 (BD Biosciences).
In vivo model of peritonitis
Listeria strain EGD and its isogenic mutants were stored at mid-log growth as glycerol stocks at –80°C and diluted in pyrogen-free saline for injection into mice. Bacteria were injected at a dose of 5 x 104 Listeria/mouse intraperitoneally in 500 µL. At indicated time points after injection, mice were killed and peritoneal exudates were collected by lavage in 10 mL RPMI. Cell-free supernatants were stored at –20°C and later used for the determination of IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
), and IL-1β by ELISA (BD Biosciences). Total cell number was determined for each mouse, and cells were cytospun onto slides and stained with the Hem 3 staining kit (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). The percentage of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) was determined by differential cell counting.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2β1 integrin-dependent mast-cell activation results in IL-1β secretion
Previously, we reported that
2β1 integrin expression on mast cells is required for IL-6 production at 1 hour and neutrophil recruitment at 6 hours after infection with Listeria. However, IL-6 is not a chemoattractant. To define chemoattractants responsible for neutrophil influx after Listeria infection, we measured the levels of IL-1β, leukotriene B4 (LTB4), and TNF-
in the peritoneal fluid of WT and
2-null mice. Wild-type mice, but not
2-null mice, demonstrated a marked increase of IL-1β and IL-6 levels at 1 hour after infection with Listeria that was diminished by 6 hours after infection (Figure 1A,B).14 In addition, there was a small increase in the level of TNF-
in the WT, but not
2-null, mice at 1 and 6 hours (Figure 1C). Wild-type mice, but not
2-null mice, manifested a robust influx of PMNs into the peritoneal cavity that peaked at 6 hours after infection, as previously reported (Figure 1D). The level of IL-1β that we observe is consistent with several reports demonstrating the neutrophil chemotactic properties of IL-1β. Although LTB4 is secreted by mast cells and is a potent stimulator of neutrophil migration, we did not observe increased LTB4 above baseline at the time points tested (data not shown). Therefore, in addition to IL-6, several chemoattractants are secreted in an
2β1 integrin-dependent manner that may contribute to the acute inflammatory response to L monocytogenes.
|
is not required for mast-cell activation
We demonstrated that
2β1 integrin-C1q-immune complex interaction was required, but not sufficient, for mast-cell activation in response to L monocytogenes. These data suggested that one or more additional signals emanating from an additional receptor, such as the FcR
chain, was required to activate cytokine secretion (Figure 2A).1 To determine whether the FcR
chain was required, we compared the ability of purified PMCs from WT or FcR
–/– mice to bind to a matrix of either Listeria-containing immune complexes or type I collagen. PMCs from both WT and FcR
–/– mice adhered to collagen and Listeria containing immune complexes in an
2β1 integrin-mediated, divalent cation-dependent manner (Figure 2B). These data demonstrate that PMC adhesion to immune complex via the
2β1 integrin does not require FcR
. To determine whether
2β1 integrin-dependent PMC activation requires signaling downstream of the FcR
, we measured the release of IL-6 from WT and FcR
–/– PMCs after stimulation with a complex of Listeria plus anti-Listeria IgG antibody or an immune complex of Listeria plus anti-Listeria IgG antibody plus serum. Neither WT nor FcR
–/– PMCs were activated in the presence of Listeria and antibody alone. In contrast, both, WT and FcR
–/– mice released similarly high levels of IL-6 in response to Listeria plus antibody plus serum (Figure 2C). These results indicate that FcR
is not required in vitro for the
2β1 integrin-dependent activation of PMC by Listeria plus immune complex. In addition, these data suggest that the FcR
does not serve as a coreceptor for the
2β1 integrin in immune complex–stimulated mast-cell activation.
|
in many immune responses to Ig complexes, we wanted to determine whether the FcR
was required for the early neutrophil recruitment in response to Listeria. To determine the role of the FcR
in vivo in response to Listeria, PMN influx and IL-6 secretion into the peritoneal cavity were evaluated in WT and FcR
–/– mice. Both WT and mice deficient in the FcR
exhibited maximal IL-6 secretion at 1 hour and a robust neutrophil response at 6 hours (Figure 2D,E). These data demonstrate that signals downstream of the FcR
are not required for the early innate immune response to Listeria. Complement activation is not required for mast-cell activation
We therefore hypothesized that mast-cell binding via the
2β1 integrin to an immune complex containing C1q may directly activate the complement cascade, resulting in the deposition of C3b or iC3b and the generation of complement byproducts such as C3a or C5a. In turn, binding of complement components to their cognate receptors on mast cells (complement receptor 1 [CR1], CR3, CR4, C3aR, or C5aR) would then stimulate mast-cell activation, as has previously been shown.7–9
To determine whether complement activation provided the costimulatory signal for IL-6 release, we evaluated adhesion and activation of WT PMCs in response to immune complex formed from Listeria plus anti-Listeria antibody and murine serum from WT mice or mice deficient in classic complement cascade components, C1q, C3, C4, or C5, or the alternate cascade component, factor B. Listeria plus anti-Listeria antibody plus serum from WT mice and mice deficient in C3, C4, C5, and factor B resulted in formation of an adhesive substrate (Figure 3A). As previously demonstrated, C1q-deficient serum failed to form an adhesive substrate for the
2β1 integrin.4 To evaluate PMC activation, we measured secretion of IL-6 by PMCs after stimulation with Listeria plus anti-Listeria antibody plus WT serum or serum deficient in C1q, C3, C4, C5, or factor B. Wild-type PMCs secreted high levels of IL-6 in response to immune complexes formed with WT serum, as well as with serum deficient in C3, C4, C5, or factor B. As expected from our earlier report,4 immune complexes from C1q-deficient serum failed to activate WT PMCs (Figure 3B). Therefore, C1q, but not other complement components, is required for mast-cell activation. These results indicate that neither FcR
nor complement components other than C1q act as costimulatory signals for PMC activation by Listeria immune complexes.
|
2β1 integrin provided a signal that could not be duplicated by peritoneal matrix components, such as collagen. Listeria surface molecules stimulate PMC activation
We had previously shown that WT PMCs adhere to plate-bound immune complexes formed between BSA, anti-BSA antibody, and serum in an
2β1 integrin-dependent manner.4 To determine whether binding of WT PMCs to an immune complex alone, without Listeria, was sufficient to mediate cytokine secretion, we compared IL-6 secretion by PMCs after 1-hour stimulation with immune complexes consisting of BSA-coated latex beads plus anti-BSA antibody and serum or immune complexes consisting of Listeria plus anti-Listeria antibody plus serum. Wild-type PMCs secreted abundant IL-6 in response to Listeria plus immune complex, as previously shown, but failed to secrete IL-6 in response to BSA plus immune complex. Therefore, the immune complex alone was not sufficient to stimulate PMC activation (Figure 4A). The addition of Listeria alone to the BSA-immune complex restored IL-6 secretion to levels similar to activation with Listeria containing immune complex (Figure 4A). This result suggested that interactions of the PMC with Listeria were providing the additional activation signal required after
2β1 integrin-ligation to immune complex.s
|
2β1 integrin-dependent mast-cell activation. To examine the role of Listeria and TLRs in immune complex–mediated mast-cell activation, we compared IL-6 secretion from PMCs after stimulation with BSA-immune complexes plus either live Listeria, heat-killed L monocytogenes, the TLR2 agonists Pam3Cys, or the TLR4 agonist, LPS. The addition of heat-killed Listeria, TLR2, or TLR4 agonist to the BSA immune complexes failed to result in activation of PMCs (Figure 4A). These results suggest that a heat-labile protein serves as the coreceptor for mast-cell activation and that TLR2 and TLR4 do not provide costimulatory activity. c-met acts as a coreceptor for mast-cell IL-6 release
Listeria is an intracellular pathogen that infects humans using 2 bacterial surface receptors for bacterial internalization, InlA and InlB, that bind to E-cadherin and c-met, respectively, on the host cell.10,15,16 Mouse E-cadherin does not bind to InlA because of a single point mutation in its binding site on mouse E-cadherin.17 We evaluated the expression of c-met on mature peritoneal mast cells by flow cytometric analysis. As shown in Figure 4B, WT and
2-null PMCs express high levels of c-met.
To determine whether Listeria–c-met interaction was required, inhibitory anti–c-met or anti–E-cadherin antibodies were used to block PMC-Listeria interactions. Preincubation of WT PMCs with anti–c-met antibody before stimulation with Listeria-containing immune complexes significantly diminished the IL-6 release by 40% (P = .03), suggesting that c-met may serve as a coreceptor. As expected, the inhibitory anti–E-cadherin did not significantly alter IL-6 release (Figure 4C).
The best defined ligand for c-met is HGF. We hypothesized that Listeria-stimulated PMC activation would be mimicked by HGF binding to c-met. To determine whether HGF binding alone was sufficient to activate WT PMCs when the
2β1 integrin was ligated, we compared secretion of IL-6 by WT PMCs after stimulation by BSA-immune complex plus Listeria, BSA-immune complex plus HGF, or Listeria-immune complex. The level of IL-6 produced by WT PMCs stimulated by Listeria-immune complex, BSA-immune complex plus Listeria, and BSA-immune complex plus HGF was equivalent (Figure 4D). HGF failed to stimulate IL-6 secretion when incubated with PMCs in the absence of BSA-immune complex (Figure 4D). These data suggest that stimulation of c-met by either Listeria or HGF mediates WT PMC activation in the presence of ligated
2β1 integrin.
To determine whether coactivation of the
2β1 integrin and c-met is sufficient for PMC activation, we stimulated WT PMCs adherent via the
2β1 integrin to either C1q or type I collagen with either Listeria or HGF.
2β1 integrin-dependent adhesion of WT PMCs to either collagen or C1q alone failed to result in IL-6 release, as previously shown.4 c-met activation of PMCs by Listeria or HGF alone failed to result in IL-6 secretion. However, ligation of both the
2β1 integrin and c-met resulted in PMC activation and IL-6 release (Figure 4E). These data indicate that costimulation of c-met and the
2β1 integrin is sufficient to induce mast-cell activation in the absence of additional stimuli such as immune complexes.
c-met–InlB interactions are required for the innate immune response to Listeria
InlB and InlA promote Listeria internalization into host cells. The c-met receptor on the host cell binds to InlB on Listeria; E-cadherin binds to InlA. To determine the role of InlB–c-met interaction in PMC activation, we quantitated IL-6 secretion by WT PMCs after stimulation with immune complexes formed by WT Listeria or mutant Listeria containing mutations in either InlA (
InlA) or InlB (
InlB). Activation of WT PMCs with
InlA Listeria-immune complex resulted in secretion of IL-6 at similar levels to that secreted by PMCs stimulated by WT Listeria-immune complex. In contrast, activation of WT PMCs with
InIB Listeria-immune complex resulted in significantly reduced secretion of IL-6 to baseline levels (Figure 5A).
|
2β1-dependent innate immune responses to Listeria mediated by PMC secretion of IL-6 resulted in neutrophil recruitment at 6 hours,1 we hypothesized that the c-met–InlB interaction was required not only in vitro but also for
2β1 integrin-dependent response in vivo. Wild-type and
2-null mice were infected intraperitoneally with WT,
InlA, or
InlB Listeria. As reported, WT mice, but not
2-null mice, when infected with WT Listeria, demonstrate high levels of IL-6 in the peritoneal cavity 1 hour after infection and robust neutrophil recruitment at 6 hours after infection. Wild-type, but not
2-null, mice responded with a rapid cytokine secretion and a similar robust neutrophil response to
InlA Listeria. In contrast,
InlB Listeria failed to elicit IL-6 secretion or neutrophil recruitment in either WT or
2-null mice (Figure 5A,B). These data demonstrate that binding of c-met to InlB cooperates with
2β1 integrin binding to C1q or collagen in the early mast cell–dependent innate immune response to Listeria both in vivo and in vitro. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2β1 integrin-dependent mast-cell activation. The synergistic contributions of
2β1 integrin and c-met receptor in immune modulation were entirely unexpected. We initially reported that the
2β1 integrin-deficient mouse demonstrated a profound and surprising defect in the innate immune response to L monocytogenes.1
2β1 integrin expression on the PMCs was required for activation and cytokine secretion in vivo.1 Here, we demonstrate that the
2β1 integrin-dependent immune response is characterized by IL-6, IL-β, and low level TNF-
release at 1 hour after infection, followed by neutrophil recruitment at 6 hours. IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-
have been described to have roles in response to Listeria infection.18–23
In addition, our previous studies demonstrated a requirement for
2β1 integrin ligation for PMC activation.4 However,
2β1 integrin-ligand interactions alone were insufficient for PMC activation because
2β1 integrin-dependent adhesion to collagen or C1q alone failed to support cytokine secretion.4 We hypothesized that one or more additional signals emanating from an additional receptor, similar to that downstream of glycoprotein VI/FcR
on platelets, was required for PMC activation.5,6 Alternatively,
2β1 integrin binding to C1q may result in activation of the complement cascade. We now demonstrate that neither complement receptors nor FcR
provides the necessary costimulatory signal for
2β1 integrin-dependent IL-6 release in vivo or in vitro. Indeed, the FcR
is not required for the early innate immune response to Listeria either in vitro or in vivo.
Instead, we identified c-met as a novel
2β1 integrin coreceptor that is essential for activation of the innate immune response to Listeria. In addition, we demonstrated cooperation between the
2β1 integrin and HGF-R/c-met in immune modulation (Figure 6). In the innate immune response to Listeria, the surface receptor InlB, a ligand for the c-met, provides the costimulatory signal. In our initial in vitro observations, mast-cell activation required Listeria-generated immune complexes. Because
2β1 integrin-dependent adhesion to either type I collagen or C1q alone was required but not sufficient for mast-cell activation, we suggested that perhaps the correct orientation of the immune complex was required for recognition.4 We have demonstrated that the orientation of the immune complex is not required for activation. Simple coligation of the integrin with either type I collagen or C1q and c-met with either Listeria organisms or c-met's natural ligand HGF is sufficient to induce activation. InlB binding to host receptor c-met is essential for infectivity and internalization into epithelial cells and hepatocytes. However, because stimulation with HGF and an
2β1 integrin ligand is sufficient for activation, we propose that internalization is not required for mast-cell activation.15 Our data now support a role for the
2β1 integrin–c-met interaction for the innate inflammatory response to Listeria.
|
2β1 integrin results in activation of the innate immune response and the recruitment of neutrophils to the site of Listeria infection. Mast cells also secrete chymases that hydrolyze HGF to generate an HGF antagonist.33 This may serve as a negative feedback loop to inhibit subsequent immune activation.
Several different cell-surface receptors for C1q and other collectin family members have been reported, including the C1q receptor for phagocytosis enhancement (C1qRp), CR1, calreticulin (CRT), and binding protein for the globular head of C1q (gC1qbp).34–47 The precise role of each receptor remains an area of active investigation. Although the ability of InlB to interact with the cellular glycoprotein gC1q-R/p3248 raised questions concerning whether gC1q-R was involved in the
2β1 and c-met–dependent PMC response, our studies suggest that gC1q-R cannot replace the
2β1 integrin in initiating the innate immune response. Using isolated components in an in vitro system, we demonstrated that PMC activation required
2β1 integrin binding to either C1q or type I collagen plus the additional interaction of c-met with either Listeria or HGF. Although C1q and Listeria both interact with gC1q-R through either the globular head of C1q or InlB of Listeria, neither type I collagen nor HGF interacts with gC1q-R. IL-6 secretion is similar regardless of whether the
2β1 integrin interacts with C1q or type I collagen and whether c-met is bound by Listeria or HGF. These data suggest that, although gC1q-R may play a role in Listeria internalization, there is no role for gC1q-R in
2β1 integrin/c-met–induced mast-cell activation. Although HGF and InlB are both ligands for c-met, they lack sequence and structural similarity.49,50 In addition, the data illustrate that these 2 ligands bind separate sites on c-met.10,51,52 Despite their differences, both HGF and InlB activate the intrinsic phosphorylation activity of Met and induce tyrosine phosphorylation at Y134910 as well as cellular changes, such as scattering and DNA synthesis.52
We now describe an example of cooperation between the
2β1 integrin and a receptor for either a critical growth factor, HGF, or for a Listeria protein required for internalization. This cross-talk then leads to activation of the mast cell, a cell critical to the innate immune system. The crosstalk between integrins and c-met in endothelial and epithelial cells regulates cell migration and invasion downstream of signaling pathways that activate FAK, which transduces signals to adaptor molecules, such as Src family kinases, PI3K, phospholipase C, and Grb2.53 After HGF or InlB binding, c-met is phosphorylated on Y1349 and 1356, which serve as docking sites for multiple signal transducers, such as Grb2-associated binder1 (Gab1) and multiple Src homology 2 domains. Given the fact that isolated ligands of
2β1 integrin and c-met can stimulate mast-cell activation in the absence of immune complex, we propose that the
2β1 integrin–c-met crosstalk occurs via downstream signaling pathways rather than by direct interaction at the cell membrane. Studies to determine the mechanism of convergence of these downstream pathways are currently under way.54–56
The role for mast cells in immunity has traditionally been limited to their role in IgE-mediated allergic responses and immunity to parasites. Mast cells are known to play an important role in the early response of the immune system and can be stimulated through a range of receptors important in the early immune response, such as TLRs 1, 3, 4, 6, and 9, complement receptors (CR2, 4, 5, C3aR, C5aR), and cytokine/chemokine receptors (IL-1R, IL-10R, IL-12R, and IFN-gR).57 We have demonstrated a novel
2β1 integrin-dependent and c-met–dependent pathway for mast-cell activation that results in the rapid release of IL-6 and occurs independently of signals downstream of FcR
. IgE cross-linking mediates signals through FcR
and results in rapid degranulation and release of histamine and β-hexosamidase.58 The secretion of IL-6 has not been described after IgE-mediated degranulation. In addition to IgE cross-linking, TLR agonists, such as LPS (TLR4) and PGN (TLR2), are able to induce degranulation of mast cells in some circumstances, although we were unable to detect IL-6 release (Figure 3A).59,60 We are actively investigating the differential degranulation of mast cells to different stimuli.
We describe an innate immune response mediated by the
2β1 integrin binding C1q, a soluble, nonmatrix factor. We previously demonstrated that the
2β1 integrin is a cellular receptor for C1q, the first component in the complement cascade and mediator of innate immune response.4 In vitro interaction between
2β1 and C1q on mast cells resulted in activation and cytokine secretion. Here, using in vivo models, we show that the C1q/
2β1 integrin interaction is, indeed, required for innate immune response to Listeria. C1q-deficient mice do not release IL-6 or recruit PMNs into the peritoneum after Listeria infections. Although collagen and other ECM components are abundant in the peritoneum, collagen binding either does not occur or is not sufficient to mediate mast- cell activation after Listeria infection. Because the homology between C1q and the integrin binding site of collagen is high, the importance of the integrin and C1q interaction is probably significant given the low amount of genetic drift between these 2 sequences over time.
The
2β1 integrin in expressed on numerous cells, including cells of the innate immune system, such as mast cells and natural killer cells as well as cells of the adaptive immune system, such as a subset of activated T cells.61–63 The
2β1 integrin in these cells has been thought to act primarily through its ability to bind collagen in the extracellular matrix, thereby affecting cellular localization. Our work is the first to show that
2β1 integrin can bind C1q and transduce a signal that is absolutely necessary, but not sufficient, to initiate a proinflammatory cytokine response. C1q is known to play an important role in immune complex diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, Arthus reaction, autoantibody-induced arthritis, glomerulonephritis, and experimental autoimmune encephalitis.11,64–66 In addition, mast cells have been associated with these diseases.36,67–70 Our findings provide a molecular mechanism linking C1q and activation of these inflammatory cells. Mast cells act as sentinels for the immune system at the body's boundaries. C1q binding of the
2β1 integrin is an initiating event of mast-cell degranulation and, hence, an initial trigger for the subsequent inflammatory response. Therefore, inhibition ofthe C1q/
2β1 interaction would probably be an effective target for therapeutic intervention.
| Authorship |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Correspondence: Mary M. Zutter, Department of Pathology, C-3321A, 1161 21st Avenue South, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232-2561; e-mail: mary.zutter{at}vanderbilt.edu.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants RO1 CA098027 and RO1 CA115984.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, January 15, 2008
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-107664
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2β1 integrin. Blood 2004; 103:2214–2220.
2β1 integrin. J Cell Biol 2004; 166:97–109.
2 integrin, very late antigen-2). J Immunol 2001; 167:1141–1144.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. San Antonio, J. J. Zoeller, K. Habursky, K. Turner, W. Pimtong, M. Burrows, S. Choi, S. Basra, J. S. Bennett, W. F. DeGrado, et al. A Key Role for the Integrin {alpha}2{beta}1 in Experimental and Developmental Angiogenesis Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2009; 175(3): 1338 - 1347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||