Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 September 2008, Vol. 112, No. 6, pp. 2579-2582.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on June 23, 2008; DOI 10.1182/blood-2007-11-118893.


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Table
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2007-11-118893v1
blood-2007-11-118893v2
112/6/2579    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Narimatsu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Narimatsu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Transplantation
Right arrow Free Research Articles
Right arrow Brief Reports
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

TRANSPLANTATION

Brief Report

Chronic graft-versus-host disease following umbilical cord blood transplantation: retrospective survey involving 1072 patients in Japan

Hiroto Narimatsu1, Shigesaburo Miyakoshi2, Takuhiro Yamaguchi3, Masahiro Kami1, Tomoko Matsumura2, Koichiro Yuji2, Naoko Murashige4, Eiji Kusumi5, Yuko Kodama1, Tsunehiko Komatsu6, Hisashi Sakamaki7, Yasushi Kouzai8, Masaya Okada9, Yuko Osugi10, Ryoji Kobayashi11, Masami Inoue12, Satoshi Takahashi13, Shunro Kai2, Koji Kato2, Tokiko Inoue-Nagamura2, Shuichi Taniguchi2, Shunichi Kato2, for the Japan Cord Blood Bank Network

1 Divison of Exploratory Research, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo; 2 Japan Cord Blood Bank Network, Tokyo; 3 Department of Clinical Trial Data Management, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo; 4 Office for Life-Style Related Diseases Control, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Tokyo; 5 Department of Hematology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo; 6 The Third Department of Internal Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo; 7 Division of Hematology, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo; 8 Department of Transfusion, Tokyo Metropolitan Fuchu Hospital, Tokyo; 9 Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya; 10 Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka; 11 Department of Paediatrics, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo; 12 Department of Hematology/Oncology, Osaka Medical Center and Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Osaka; and 13 Division of Molecular Therapy, Advanced Clinical Research Center, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
We have little information on chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after cord blood transplantation (CBT). We investigated its clinical features in 1072 Japanese patients with hematologic malignancies who received a transplant through the Japan Cord Blood Bank Network. The primary end point was to investigate the incidence of any chronic GVHD. Median age of the patients was 33 years (range, 0-79 years). The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD 2 years after transplantation was 28%. Chronic GVHD was fatal in 29 patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that development of chronic GVHD was favorably associated with both overall survival and event-free survival. Multivariate analysis identified risk factors of chronic GVHD: higher patient body weight, higher number of mismatched antigens for GVHD direction, myeloablative preparative regimen, use of mycophenolate mofetil in GVHD prophylaxis, and development of grades II to IV acute GVHD. Although chronic GVHD is a significant problem after CBT, it is associated with improved survival, perhaps due to graft-versus-malignancy effects.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a significant concern in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Many studies have been published on clinical features of chronic GVHD following bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). In contrast, we have limited information on chronic GVHD following cord blood transplantation (CBT)


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
Informed consent was obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. According to local policy, the study was approved by Japan Cord Blood Bank Network. We had no direct contact with human subjects during our study; data on patients who underwent CBT were obtained from the Japan Cord Blood Bank Network. The primary end point of this study was to investigate the incidence of any chronic GVHD after CBT. Cord blood units are provided with written informed consent. Between June 1997 and August 2006, 2713 cord blood transplant recipients were registered with the Japan Cord Blood Bank Network. All recipients received a single cord blood unit. We included those with hematologic malignancies who underwent CBT without T-cell depletion. We excluded patients with a history of any type of allogeneic HSCT prior to CBT. A total of 2015 patients met the criteria. Of those, we excluded 943 with disease progression, death without progression, and graft failure within 100 days after transplantation. In this study, we retrospectively investigated clinical features of chronic GVHD in the remaining 1072 patients. Cytomegalovirus-seropositive cord blood unit was not provided to transplantation centers. Acute and chronic GVHD were diagnosed and graded according to standard criteria.1,2 GVHD that developed after day 100 was defined as chronic GVHD. If the mode of presentation for chronic GVHD was progressive, the date of onset was defined as day 100. SAS version 9.1.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all statistical analyses.


    Results and discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
The median age of the 1072 patients was 33 years (range, 0-79 years) and the median patient body weight was 50.0 kg (range, 4.0-96.1 kg). The median follow up of the surviving patients was 18.1 months (range, 3.3-110.1 months). Of the 1072 patients, 492 (46%) developed grades II to IV acute GVHD within 100 days of transplantation. Chronic GVHD was diagnosed in 312, and the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD 2 years after transplantation was 28% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25%-31%; Figure 1). Of the 299 patients in whom the information on types of chronic GVHD was available, 184 and 115 patients developed limited and extensive diseases, respectively.


Figure 1
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD 2 years after transplantation was 28% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25%-31%). Cumulative incidence curves were used to calculate the probability of chronic GVHD to take account of competing risks: disease progression, death without disease progression, and onset of graft failure.

 
The onset of chronic GVHD was quiescent (n = 225), de novo (n = 48), progressive (n = 18), and unknown (n = 8). Information on involved organs of chronic GVHD was available in 145 patients. Their involved organs were skin (n = 94), oral cavity (n = 35), liver (n = 32), lung (n = 24), gastrointestinal tract (n = 20), and eye (n = 16). Of 224 patients from whom information on both the treatment of chronic GVHD and its response was available, 93 patients (42%) received systemic immunosuppressive agents including corticosteroids (n = 63), calcineurin inhibitors (n = 15), both (n = 13), and others (n = 2). Of those 93 patients, 64 patients (68%) responded to the treatment. Chronic GVHD was refractory in the remaining 29, and fatal in 5.

Multivariate analysis identified prognostic factors of chronic GVHD: higher patient body weight (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01-1.02; P = .001), higher number of mismatched antigens for graft-versus-host direction (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.07-1.60; P = .01), reduced-intensity preparative regimen (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 1.11-3.28, P = .02), use of mycophenolate mofetil in GVHD prophylaxis (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.11-3.28, P = .02), and development of grades II to IV acute GVHD (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.18-1.93; P = .001; Table S1Table S1, available on the Blood website; see the Supplemental Materials link at the top of the online article).

Of the 1072 patients, 307 died during follow up due to disease progression (n = 189), chronic GVHD (n = 29), infection (n = 23), and others (n = 66). Prognostic factors of transplantation outcomes are shown in Table 1. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) at 3 years after CBT were 63% (95% CI, 36%-90%) and 54% (95% CI, 27%-80%), respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Risk factors of overall survival and event-free survival in multivariate analysis

 
The present study is the first larger report addressing features of chronic GVHD in CBT. The incidence of chronic GVHD after CBT was 28% in our study, which was comparable with the previous smaller reports on CBT conducted in Western countries36 and was lower than that after BMT from unrelated donors (UR-BMT) in Japanese patients.7,8 Since the genetic backgrounds of the Japanese people are relatively homogeneous compared with those of the Western people, the incidences of chronic GVHD following UR-BMT are reportedly low in Japanese patients; our results in CBT contrast with such previous investigations.7,8 The present study suggests that the mechanism of GVHD development is possibly affected by factors other than the genetic backgrounds of the patients' ethnicities. There are few previous studies on treatment responses of chronic GVHD after CBT. The present study suggests a higher response rate and lower mortality in chronic GVHD patients after CBT than that after UR-BMT and PBSCT.916 The low overall incidence despite HLA mismatches, relatively low need for systemic immunosuppression, and positive survival impact indicate milder nature of chronic GVHD after CBT. This may be related to the immature lymphocytes in cord blood that are immunologically tolerant,17,18 although the basic mechanism is unknown and awaits further investigations.

The present study demonstrated that chronic GVHD after CBT improved EFS and reduced the risk of disease progression. Although graft-versus-malignancy (GVM) effects of chronic GVHD after CBT have not been reported, our results were comparable with previous studies in BMT and PBSCT.2,19,20 Chronic GVHD following CBT probably has clinically significant GVM effects. Interestingly, chronic GVHD after CBT improved OS as well. These findings contrasted with the unclear effects of chronic GVHD on OS improvement in conventional allogeneic HSCT.2,19,20 The observations are probably associated with the possible favorable impact of chronic GVHD after CBT on nonrelapse mortality.

The present study provided useful information on chronic GVHD after CBT, although some issues remain to be discussed. First, since our study was retrospective, unrecognized bias may have affected the results. Second, we used the classical diagnostic criteria of chronic GVHD2 and did not distinguish the late onset acute GVHD that occurs after day 100 from the classic chronic GVHD as the National Institutes of Health consensus project proposed.21 Third, suggestions by our study on future strategies for cord unit selection and GVHD prophylaxis would be informative. Our multivariate analysis suggested an association of mycophenolate mofetil with development of chronic GVHD, whereas methotrexate was associated with better nonrelapse mortality. Although the mechanism is uncertain, clinicians may prefer to use methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis. Since GVM effects of chronic GVHD were suggested, risk stratification may be possible in cord blood selection. Using cord blood with higher HLA mismatches for patients with high-risk primary diseases might be permissible. Finally, the applicability of our results to patients with higher body weight with heterogeneous genetic backgrounds in Western countries remains to be discussed. All of our patients received single cord blood units, whereas the majority of cord blood transplants are double cord blood units in Western countries. However, the incidence of chronic GVHD is lower and response to immunosuppressants is better in CBT than in UR-BMT in Western countries22; hence, the milder nature with lower incidence in chronic GVHD following CBT is probably common among Japanese and Westerns patients. The features of chronic GVHD following CBT in Western adult patients require further investigations.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that the incidence of chronic GVHD after CBT is probably lower than BMT or PBSCT, and is associated with improved survival. More intensive studies on the biology of chronic GVHD in CBT are warranted for our understanding and better management of chronic GVHD.


    Authorship
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
Contribution: H.N., S.M., and M.K. designed the research and wrote the paper; T.Y. analyzed data; T.M., K.Y., N.M., E.K., Y. Kodama, T.K., H.S., Y. Kouzai, M.O., Y.O., R.K., M.I., and S. Takahashi performed research; S. Kai, K.K., T.I.-N., and S. Taniguchi managed the data; and S. Kato took leadership of the authors.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Hiroto Narimatsu, Division of Exploratory Research, Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, 4-6-1, Shirokanedai, Minato-ku 180-8639, Tokyo, Japan; e-mail: narimt54{at}med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are grateful to Dr Takanori Teshima at the Center for Cellular and Molecular Medicine of Kyushu University Hospital (Fukuoka, Japan) for providing useful information.

This work was supported by a Research Grant on Tissue Engineering (H17-14) from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan.


    Footnotes
 
Submitted November 2, 2007; accepted January 19, 2008.

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, June 16, 2008 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-11-118893

The online version of this article contains a data supplement.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and discussion
 Authorship
 References
 

  1. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;15:825–828.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  2. Sullivan KM, Agura E, Anasetti C, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease and other late complications of bone marrow transplantation. Semin Hematol. 1991;28:250–259.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  3. Rubinstein P, Carrier C, Scaradavou A, et al. Outcomes among 562 recipients of placental-blood transplants from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1565–1577.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Laughlin MJ, Eapen M, Rubinstein P, et al. Outcomes after transplantation of cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2265–2275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Rocha V, Labopin M, Sanz G, et al. Transplants of umbilical-cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with acute leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2276–2285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Laughlin MJ, Barker J, Bambach B, et al. Hematopoietic engraftment and survival in adult recipients of umbilical-cord blood from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1815–1822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Morishima Y, Sasazuki T, Inoko H, et al. The clinical significance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allele compatibility in patients receiving a marrow transplant from serologically HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR matched unrelated donors. Blood. 2002;99:4200–4206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  8. Atsuta Y, Suzuki R, Yamamoto K, et al. Risk and prognostic factors for Japanese patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006;37:289–296.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  9. Sullivan KM, Witherspoon RP, Storb R, et al. Prednisone and azathioprine compared with prednisone and placebo for treatment of chronic graft-v-host disease: prognostic influence of prolonged thrombocytopenia after allogeneic marrow transplantation. Blood. 1988;72:546–554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  10. Sullivan KM, Witherspoon RP, Storb R, et al. Alternating-day cyclosporine and prednisone for treatment of high-risk chronic graft-v-host disease. Blood. 1988;72:555–561.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Siadak M, Sullivan KM. The management of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood Rev. 1994;8:154–160.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  12. Koc S, Leisenring W, Flowers ME, et al. Therapy for chronic graft-versus-host disease: a randomized trial comparing cyclosporine plus prednisone versus prednisone alone. Blood. 2002;100:48–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  13. Cutler C, Giri S, Jeyapalan S, Paniagua D, Viswanathan A, Antin JH. Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic peripheral-blood stem-cell and bone marrow transplantation: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3685–3691.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  14. Przepiorka D, Anderlini P, Saliba R, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2001;98:1695–1700.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Mohty M, Kuentz M, Michallet M, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation: long-term results of a randomized study. Blood. 2002;100:3128–3134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  16. Flowers ME, Parker PM, Johnston LJ, et al. Comparison of chronic graft-versus-host disease after transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells versus bone marrow in allogeneic recipients: long-term follow-up of a randomized trial. Blood. 2002;100:415–419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  17. Subramaniam DS, Fowler DH, Pavletic SZ. Chronic graft-versus-host disease in the era of reduced-intensity conditioning. Leukemia. 2007;21:853–859.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  18. Chen BJ, Cui X, Sempowski GD, et al. A comparison of murine T-cell-depleted adult bone marrow and full-term fetal blood cells in hematopoietic engraftment and immune reconstitution. Blood. 2002;99:364–371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Horowitz MM, Gale RP, Sondel PM, et al. Graft-versus-leukemia reactions after bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 1990;75:555–562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  20. Ringdén O. Bone marrow transplantation using unrelated donors for haematological malignancies. Med Oncol. 1997;14:11–22.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  21. Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I, diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005;11:945–956.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  22. Arora M, Nagaraj S, Wagner JE, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) following unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT): higher response rate in recipients of unrelated donor (URD) umbilical cord blood (UCB). Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13:1145–1152.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Table
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2007-11-118893v1
blood-2007-11-118893v2
112/6/2579    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Narimatsu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Narimatsu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Transplantation
Right arrow Free Research Articles
Right arrow Brief Reports
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020