Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 October 2008, Vol. 112, No. 8, pp. 3508-3516.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on July 9, 2008; DOI 10.1182/blood-2007-09-113670.


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2007-09-113670v1
112/8/3508    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Blazar, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Blazar, B. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Transplantation
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

TRANSPLANTATION

TLR agonists regulate alloresponses and uncover a critical role for donor APCs in allogeneic bone marrow rejection

Patricia A. Taylor1, Michael J. Ehrhardt1, Christopher J. Lees1, Angela Panoskaltsis-Mortari1, Arthur M. Krieg2, Arlene H. Sharpe3, William J. Murphy4, Jonathan S. Serody5, Hiroaki Hemmi6, Shizuo Akira6, Robert B. Levy7, and Bruce R. Blazar1

1 Cancer Center and the Department of Pediatrics, Division of BMT, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; 2 Pfizer, Cambridge, MA; 3 Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; 4 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno; 5 Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; 6 Department of Host Defense, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan; and 7 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Miami, FL


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
Cytosine-phosphorothioate-guanine oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODNs) are synthetic ODNs with unmethylated DNA sequences that mimic viral and bacterial DNA and protect against infectious agents and tumor challenge. We show that CpG ODNs markedly accelerated graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) lethality by Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) ligation of host antigen-presenting cells (APCs), dependent upon host IFN{gamma} but independent of host IL-12, IL-6, or natural killer (NK) cells. Imaging studies showed significantly more green fluorescent protein–positive (GFP+) effector T cells in lymphoid and nonlymphoid organs. In engraftment studies, CpG ODNs promoted allogeneic donor bone marrow (BM) rejection independent of host IFN{gamma}, IL-12, or IL-6. During the course of these studies, we uncovered a previously unknown and critical role of donor BM APCs in modulating the rejection response. CpG ODNs promoted BM rejection by ligation of donor BM, but not host, TLR9. CpG ODNs did not impair engraftment of TLR9–/– BM unless wild-type myeloid (CD11b+) but not B-lineage (CD19+) BM cells were added to the donor inoculum. The importance of donor BM APCs in modulating the strength of the host antidonor rejection response was underscored by the finding that B7-1/B7-2–/– BM was less likely than wild-type BM to be rejected. Collectively, these data offer new insight into the mechanism of alloresponses regulating GVHD and BM rejection.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
Cytosine-phosphorothioate-guanine oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODNs) are synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides with unmethylated DNA sequences that mimic viral and bacterial DNA and are recognized by Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), a pattern-recognition receptor, expressed in certain innate immune cells, including dendritic cell (DC) subsets, macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, and natural killer (NK) cells, and also in activated CD4+ T cells and B cells.118 CpG ODNs are known to trigger innate immune activation, resulting in the expression of costimulatory molecules, resistance to apoptosis, and the secretion of T helper 1 (Th1)–promoting chemokines and cytokines, including macrophage inflammatory protein-1, IFN-inducible protein-10, and other IFN-inducible proteins.9,1824 This innate immune activation typically is followed by the generation of potent adaptive immune responses. Immunostimulatory CpG ODNs have been shown to protect against a broad range of viruses, bacteria, intracellular parasites, prions, immune disorders, and tumors in numerous animal and human models of disease (reviewed in Krieg9,25).

Our previous studies showed that CpG ODNs were highly effective in reducing tumor-related mortality in murine recipients of syngeneic bone marrow transplants and acute myeloid leukemia.26 However, although CpG ODNs increased the graft-versus-leukemia effect of delayed lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) recipients, resulting in enhanced survival, CpG ODNs also increased DLI-induced graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) as indicated by clinical appearance and weight curves.26 The present study was undertaken to directly determine the effects of CpG ODNs on donor antihost alloresponses that can culminate in GVHD and also on host antidonor alloresponses that can culminate in allogeneic BM graft rejection. We found that CpG ODNs, administered at the time of transplantation, accelerated GVHD lethality by TLR9 ligation of host antigen-presenting cells (APCs). In addition, we demonstrated that CpG ODNs promoted allogeneic BM rejection by TLR9 ligation of donor BM APCs. CpG ODN–mediated BM rejection occurred independently of host TLR9 ligation. An important and unexpected result of these studies was the finding that donor BM APCs modulate the strength of the rejection process. These data give new insight into the mechanisms of GVHD and allogeneic BM rejection and suggest that donor BM APCs may be a potential therapeutic target for the enhancement of alloengraftment in BMT.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
Mice

BALB/c (H2d) and C57BL/6 (H2b; termed B6) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) or the National Institutes of Health (NIH; Bethesda, MD). B10.BR (H2k), B6 IL-12–/–, B6 IL-6–/–, B6 IFN{gamma}–/–, and BALB/c severe combined immune deficient (SCID) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. B6 Ly5.2 (CD45 allelic) mice were purchased from NIH. B6 MHC class II–/– mice were purchased from Taconic (Cambridge City, IN). B6 green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic (Tg) mice were obtained from J.S.S. TLR9–/– mice on a BALB/c and B6 background were backcrossed 4 and 6 generations, respectively. N4 BALB/c and N6 B6 TLR9+/+ mice were used as controls. TLR9–/– and B6 MyD88–/– mice were obtained from H.H. and S.A. BALB/c B7–1/B7–2–/– mice were obtained from A.H.S. B6 IFN{gamma}/IL-12–/– mice were a kind gift of Dr Zuhair Ballas (University of Iowa, Iowa City). GFP Tg, TLR9–/–, MyD88–/–, and B7–1/B7–2–/– mice were bred at the University of Minnesota. Mice were housed in a specific pathogen–free facility in microisolator cages and were used at 8 to 12 weeks of age. All protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Minnesota.

CpG ODNs

Phosphorothioate-modified ODN 2006, used in these studies and previously described, has an ODN sequence of TCGTCGTTTTGTCGTTTTGTCGTT and was provided by the Coley Pharmaceutical Group (Wellesley, MA). CpG ODNs had undetectable endotoxin levels. CpG ODNs were injected at a 100 µg/dose intraperitoneally once weekly for 4 weeks starting at day 0 (d0) for GVHD experiments and on d0 and d7 for engraftment experiments. This dose was determined to be optimal for the induction of antitumor responses.

3M-011

3M-011 (kindly provided by Dr Anna Masellis, 3M Pharmaceuticals, St Paul, MN), an imidazoquinoline and known TLR7/8 agonist,27 was injected at 1.0 mg/kg subcutaneously every other day starting at d0 for 4 weeks for GVHD experiments and for 2 weeks for engraftment experiments. This dose and schedule were determined to be a potent inducer of antitumor responses in an acute myeloid leukemia murine cell line model (B. J. Weigel and B.R.B., unpublished data, May 2008).

GVHD experiments

Recipients of the indicated strain and genotype were lethally irradiated with 8.0 Gy total body irradiation (TBI) by x-ray on d–1 and infused intravenously with 10 x 106 T cell–depleted (TCD) donor BM cells and whole splenocytes from the indicated allogeneic donor strain at the indicated cell number on d0. Where indicated, B6 recipients were depleted of NK cells with anti-NK1.1 mAb (clone PK136; National Cell Culture Center, Minneapolis, MN) by intraperitoneal injection of 400 µg on d–1 and d5, a dose and schedule previously determined to be highly depleting for NK cells, while controls received rat IgG (Rockland, Gilbertsville, PA). Nonirradiated BALB/c SCID recipients were depleted of NK cells by injection of anti–ASGM-1 (25 µL on d–4 and d–2 intraperitoneally; Wako, Richmond, VA) and infused intravenously with 106 or 3 x 106 purified T cells obtained from a pool of axillary, inguinal, and mesenteric lymph nodes (LNs) from B6 mice. T cells were purified by negative selection using Miltenyi depletion columns (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) and determined to be 98% of the desired phenotype. Mice were monitored daily for survival and weighed twice weekly for the first month, then once weekly thereafter as well as examined for the clinical appearance of GVHD.

Engraftment experiments

Recipients were irradiated on d–1 with a reduced dose of irradiation as indicated. Irradiation dose was chosen to generally result in mixed donor chimerism in most control mice to optimize the likelihood of uncovering a detrimental effect by TLR agonist. On d0, mice received 10 x 106 TCD BM cells of indicated strain by intravenous injection. BM was T-cell depleted to permit the evaluation of engraftment without the complication of GVHD. CD19+CD11b+ BM cells were purified by incubation with PE-labeled anti-CD19 and anti-CD11b antibodies (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), followed by incubation with anti-PE microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) and passage over selection columns (Miltenyi Biotec), and were then added to the donor BM inoculum. A subsequent add-back experiment investigating the role of CD19+ versus CD11b+ BM cells involved the depletion of DX5+, CD4+, CD8+, CD11c+, {gamma}{delta}+, and either CD11b+ or CD19+ cells by incubation with PE-labeled antibodies (eBioscience) followed by incubation with anti-PE microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) and passage over depletion columns (Miltenyi Biotec). This depletion was followed by positive selection of CD19+ or CD11b+ BM cells by incubation with PE-labeled anti-CD19 or CD11b antibodies (eBioscience), followed by incubation with anti-PE microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) and passage over selection columns. Cells were determined to be more than 99% of the desired phenotype by flow cytometry. A dosage of 5 x 106 of the positively selected BM subset was chosen for the add-back experiments because this is the approximate absolute number of CD11b+ or CD19+ cells contained in a 10 x 106 TCD BM inoculum, since BALB/c BM is 47% (± 5%) CD11b+ and 44% (± 7%) CD19+ (average ± 1 SD; n = 7). In some experiments, packed red blood cell volumes (PCVs) were monitored on d14 as a measure of BM aplasia as previously described.28 Donor chimerism was evaluated by peripheral blood leukocyte (PBL) phenotyping at about d35. PBLs were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies (class I or Ly allele and isotype controls; BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) and analyzed using CellQuest software on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). Mice were monitored for survival and weighed as described for GVHD experiments.

GFP in vivo imaging

B10.BR recipients were lethally irradiated with 8.0 Gy TBI on d–1 and infused intravenously on d0 with 10 x 106 B6 wild-type BM cells and 2 x 106 purified T cells obtained from a pool of axillary, inguinal, and mesenteric LNs from B6 GFP mice. T cells were purified by negative selection using Miltenyi depletion columns (Miltenyi Biotec) and determined to be more than 98% of the desired phenotype. CpG ODN (100 µg) was given intraperitoneally on d0 and d7. To obtain optimal images, mice were killed and dissected for imaging, but no tissue processing was required. A total of 3 to 4 mice per group were examined at d14. Images were taken with a Retiga Exi color camera and QCapture software (Qimaging, Burnaby, BC) mounted onto a Leica MZFLIII stereomicroscope using a GFP2 or a GFP/dsRED-bandpass filter and a 1.0x transfer lens (Leica Microsystems, Bannockburn, IL). Zoom factors from 3.5x to 10x were used for imaging (3.5x for inguinal LN, ileum, peyer patch, and skin; 7.0x for liver, spleen and kidney; and 10.0x for lung). Exposure times were optimized for each organ, and identical times and settings were used for all mice. Mice within a group yielded very similar results at each time point, so a representative image is illustrated.

Statistics

Survival data were analyzed by life-table methods; actuarial survival rates are shown. Group comparisons were made by log-rank test statistics. To assess chimerism data, group comparisons of percentage donor chimerism were analyzed by the Student t test. Engraftment and survival rates were analyzed by chi-square test. P values less than or equal to .05 were considered significant in all tests.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
CpG ODNs given at the time of BMT markedly accelerated GVHD-induced mortality

Numerous studies indicate that immunostimulatory CpG ODNs confer potent anti-infectious and antitumor properties (reviewed in Krieg9,25). Although patients who undergo allogeneic BMT are at significant risk of infectious complications and tumor relapse, and therefore might be expected to benefit from CpG ODNs, we hypothesized that CpG ODNs might increase GVHD via their stimulatory effects on the innate and adaptive immune systems. To study the effect of CpG ODNs in the context of allogeneic BMT, lethally irradiated B10.BR mice were infused with MHC-disparate C57BL/6 (B6) BM and splenocytes, and CpG ODNs were injected weekly beginning on the day of BMT (d0) and continuing for a total of 4 weeks (Figure 1A). CpG ODN reduced the median survival time (MST) from 94 days to 40 days in recipients of 5 x 106 splenocytes (P = .036) and 28.3 days to 16 days in recipients of 25 x 106 splenocytes (P = .015; Figure 1A).


Figure 1
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. CpG ODNs accelerate GVHD mortality. (A-C) CpG ODNs were given intraperitoneally to cohorts of mice on d0, d7, d14, d21, and d28 (100 µg/dose). CpG indicates CpG treatment. (A) Lethally irradiated B10.BR mice were given B6 BM and 5 x 106 or 25 x 106 splenocytes (eg, 5S = 5 x 106, 25S = 25 x 106 splenocytes). n = 8/group, P ≤ .036. (B) Lethally irradiated B6 mice were given BALB/c BM and 5 x 106 or 15 x 106 splenocytes. n = 16 to 24 per group, pool of 2 to 3 experiments; P ≤ .009. (C) Nonirradiated, NK cell–depleted BALB/c SCID mice were given 106 or 3 x 106 purified B6 T cells; n = 8/group, P < .05.

 
To determine whether CpG ODN–induced GVHD acceleration was strain dependent, CpG ODNs were evaluated in a second strain combination. CpG ODNs accelerated GVHD and increased mortality in lethally irradiated B6 mice receiving fully allogeneic BALB/c BM and splenocytes (Figure 1B). CpG ODNs increased mortality from 29% to 83% in recipients of 5 x 106 splenocytes (P = .004) and decreased MST from 46 days to 23 days in recipients of 15 x 106 splenocytes (P = .009; Figure 1B).

Lethal irradiation creates a proinflammatory milieu that is known to contribute to optimal GVHD generation and lethality.29 CpG ODN–mediated acceleration of GVHD was not dependent upon irradiation because CpG ODNs accelerated mortality in nonirradiated BALB/c SCID recipients of B6 T cells (Figure 1C; P < .05 for both cell doses).

Collectively, these data indicate that CpG ODNs administered early after BMT markedly accelerate GVHD lethality in the presence or absence of radiation-induced injury and in several MHC-disparate donor-recipient strain combinations.

CpG ODNs increased effector T cell number in lymphoid, parenchymal, and epithelial GVHD target tissues

To determine if CpG ODNs had differential effects on effector T-cell expansion and homing, GFP imaging studies were performed. Purified B6 GFP T cells were infused with B6 wild-type BM into lethally irradiated B10.BR mice, and CpG ODNs were given on d0 and d7. Consistent with survival studies indicating acceleration of GVHD mortality, CpG ODNs increased donor T-cell number in lymphoid and nonlymphoid parenchymal and epithelial GVHD target organs 14 days after BMT (Figure 2). CpG ODNs significantly increased effector T-cell number in inguinal and other peripheral LNs, spleen, Peyer patch, and gut-associated lymphoid tissue of the ileum and colon (Figure 2A,B; data not shown). CpG ODNs also increased GFP effector number in parenchymal organs, including liver, lung, and kidney (Figure 2C; data not shown). Donor T-cell number was also dramatically increased in the skin and oral mucosal tissue of CpG ODN–treated mice (Figure 2D).


Figure 2
View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. CpG ODNs markedly increase GFP+ effector T-cell number in lymphoid and nonlymphoid organs on d14 after BMT. B10.BR mice were lethally irradiated and infused with B6 wild-type BM and B6 GFP+ purified T cells. CpG ODNs (100 µg) was administered on d0 and d7. On d14, mice were killed and indicated organs were imaged. Representative images from 1 of 3 or 4 mice are shown. See "GFP in vivo imaging" for imaging details.

 
CpG ODN–mediated acceleration of GVHD was dependent upon both host APC TLR9 ligation and IFN{gamma} production

In the irradiated GVHD models, APCs (host or donor origin) or alloactivated donor CD4+ T cells were the most likely target cell candidates for GVHD acceleration after CpG ODN administration. However, donor APCs were not infused in the nonirradiated SCID GVHD model, thereby reducing the putative target cell candidates to host APCs or donor T cells. To determine whether TLR9 signaling of host or donor cells was essential for CpG ODN–mediated GVHD acceleration, studies were performed with TLR9–/– recipient or donor mice. CpG ODNs did not accelerate GVHD in TLR9–/– recipients of wild-type BM and splenocytes but did reduce the MST of wild-type recipients given donor BM and TLR9–/– splenocytes from 50 days to 19 days, indicating that CpG ODN accelerated GVHD by TLR9 ligation of host APCs (P = .012; Figure 3A,B). Because the immune effects of TLR9 (and TLR7) are mediated through the adapter protein MyD88,30,31 complementary studies were performed examining the effect of CpG ODNs in MyD88–/– recipients. As expected, and similar to results with TLR9–/– recipients, CpG ODNs did not accelerate GVHD in MyD88–/– mice (P = .432; Figure 3C). Of special note, TLR9–/– and MyD88–/– mice were not resistant to lethal GVHD.


Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. CpG ODNs accelerate GVHD by TLR9 ligation of host but not donor APCs. CpG ODNs were given intraperitoneally to cohorts of mice on d0, d7, d14, d21, and d28 (100 µg/dose). Recipients were lethally irradiated on d–1. (A) B6 TLR9–/– mice were given wild-type BALB/c BM and splenocytes (15 x 106). n = 8 per group, P = .085. (B) Wild-type B6 mice were given BALB/c wild-type BM and BALB/c TLR9–/– splenocytes (15 x 106). n = 8 per group, P = .012. (C) B6 MyD88–/– mice were given wild-type BALB/c BM and splenocytes (5 x 106). n = 7 to 8 per group, P = .432.

 
Previously, we reported that splenocytes exposed to CpG ODN in vitro released proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, IL-12p70, and IFN{gamma}.26 To determine whether CpG ODN–induced GVHD was dependent upon specific host proinflammatory cytokine production, a series of experiments was performed using B6 allogeneic recipients deficient in proinflammatory cytokine production. Whereas B6 IL-6–/– or B6 IL12p40–/– BM transplant recipients given CpG ODN had a marked acceleration in GVHD lethality (P ≤ .003; Figure 4A,B), mice deficient in IFN{gamma} alone or in conjunction with IL-12p40 did not have a significant acceleration in GVHD mortality (P > .21, control vs CpG; Figure 4C,D). Although CpG ODNs stimulate NK cells that are major producers of IFN{gamma}, host NK production of IFN{gamma} was not required for CpG ODN–mediated GVHD acceleration because CpG ODNs accelerated GVHD mortality in NK-depleted wild-type recipients (P = .041; Figure 4E). At a lower spleen dose, CpG ODNs significantly increased the mortality rate in NK-depleted mice from 0% to 63% (P = .005; Figure 4F). Collectively, these data indicate that CpG ODNs accelerate GVHD and increase GVHD mortality by TLR9 ligation of host APCs in a host IFN{gamma}-dependent, NK cell–independent fashion.


Figure 4
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. CpG ODN–mediated GVHD acceleration is independent of host IL-6, IL-12, and host NK cells, but is dependent on host IFN{gamma}; a TLR7/8 agonist also increased GVHD. CpG ODNs were given intraperitoneally to cohorts of mice on d0, d7, d14, d21, and d28 (100 µg/dose). Recipients were lethally irradiated on d–1. (A) B6 IL-6–/– mice were given BALB/c BM and splenocytes (5 x 106). n = 8 per group, P < .001. (B) B6 IL-12–/– mice were given BALB/c BM and splenocytes (15 x 106). n = 8 per group, P = .003. (C) B6 IFN{gamma}–/– mice were given BALB/c BM and 2 x 106 or 5 x 106 splenocytes. n = 8 per group, P ≥ .273. (D) B6 IFN{gamma}/IL-12–/– mice were given BALB/c BM and splenocytes (5 x 106). n = 6 per group, P = .213. (E,F) NK cell–depleted B6 mice were given BALB/c BM and splenocytes. (E) 5 x 106, P = .041. (F) 2.5 x 106, P = .005; n = 8 per group. (G) B6 mice were given BALB/c BM and splenocytes (5 x 106), and 3M-011 or drug vehicle was given subcutaneously to cohorts of mice every other day for 4 weeks starting d0. n = 10 per group, P = .006. Data were reproduced in a second experiment.

 
In addition to TLR9 agonists, TLR7 and TLR8 agonists have been developed to target a range of diseases, including cancers, infections, asthma, and allergies, and to serve as potent vaccine adjuvants.3240 Like TLR9, TLR7 and TLR8 are located in the intracellular endosomal compartment of innate immune cells with highest expression in plasmacytoid DCs, a DC subset that produces large amounts of type I IFN in response to viral infections (reviewed in Kawai and Akira,36 Krieg and Vollmer,37 and Takeda and Akira41). Whereas TLR9 detects unmethylated CpG motifs in bacterial and viral DNA, TLR7/8 detects viral and synthetic single-stranded RNA.36,37,41 To determine the effect of other TLR agonists on GVHD, 3M-011, a potent TLR7/8 agonist found to be protective against influenza virus in rats,27 was administered to B6 recipients of BALB/c BM and a low splenocyte dose. Similar to TLR9 ligation by CpG ODNs, 3M-011 increased the GVHD mortality rate from 0% to 50% (P = .006; Figure 4G).

CpG ODNs significantly decreased allogeneic donor BM engraftment via TLR9 signaling effects on donor but not host APCs

CpG ODNs accelerated GVHD via TLR9 signaling of host but not donor cells. We hypothesized that TLR9 signaling of host cells, with the resultant proinflammatory cytokine production, would stimulate allogeneic donor BM graft rejection. To study the effect of CpG ODNs on engraftment, recipients were given a lower dose of irradiation to permit the survival of some host T cells that would be able to reject donor BM in the event that CpG ODNs mediated increased rejection, and TCD BM to avoid the complication of GVHD. CpG ODN significantly decreased the d35 survival rate of B6 mice given BALB/c TCD BM from 88% to 55% (Table 1; P < .003). Significantly lower d14 PCVs in CpG ODN–treated mice indicated deaths were due to accelerated BM rejection resulting in BM aplasia (20.2% vs 39.6% PCV; P < .001, n = 25, pool of 2 experiments; data not shown). Consistent with this hypothesis, CpG ODN decreased the engraftment rate of surviving mice from 86% to 50% and reduced the average donor chimerism from 70% to 31% (Table 1; P ≤ .007).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. CpG ODNs promote donor BM graft rejection independent of host IFN{gamma}, IL-12, and IL-6

 
To determine if CpG ODNs increased rejection mediated by both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets, B6 BM was infused into sublethally irradiated class II–disparate bm12 or class I–disparate bm1 recipients in which rejection is mediated by CD4+ or CD8+ T cells, respectively (Table 1). CpG ODNs reduced donor chimerism in bm12 recipients from 77% to 39% and in bm1 recipients from 91% to 37%, indicating that both host CD4+ and CD8+ T cell–mediated rejection were increased (P < .001).

Despite the important role of IFN{gamma} on Th1-mediated immune responses and CpG ODN–induced GVHD acceleration, CpG ODNs decreased allogeneic BM engraftment in IFN{gamma}–/– as well as IL-12p40–/– and IL-6–/– mice, indicating that CpG ODN–mediated rejection was independent of host IFN{gamma}, IL-12, or IL-6 (Table 1; P ≤ .05).

Given the critical role of host TLR9 signaling and IFN{gamma} production on GVHD acceleration, we considered 2 possibilities. The explanation we favored was that TLR9 signaling of host cells was required for graft rejection, but that these effects were not mediated via IFN{gamma}, IL-12p40, or IL-6 production. The alternative and seemingly less likely explanation was that TLR9 signaling was mediating rejection via effects on donor BM cells rather than host cells. To determine the role of donor versus host TLR9 signaling requirements of CpG ODN–mediated BM rejection, B6 wild-type or TLR9–/– mice were given allogeneic BALB/c wild-type or TLR9–/– TCD BM, and engraftment was assessed (Table 2). Contrary to our expectations, CpG ODNs increased rejection in TLR9–/– recipients, indicating that signaling of host TLR9 was not required for CpG ODN–mediated rejection (P < .001). Moreover, CpG ODNs did not increase rejection of TLR9–/– TCD BM by wild-type recipients, demonstrating the critical role of donor TLR9 signaling for CpG ODN–mediated rejection of allogeneic donor BM (P = .869). Together, these data indicated that CpG ODN signaling of TLR9 on a donor BM cell was the critical mechanism by which CpG ODNs increased allogeneic donor BM rejection.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. CpG ODNs promote rejection by ligation of donor BM TLR9 but not host TLR9

 
To determine whether CpG ODN–stimulated donor APCs were essential for inducing donor BM graft rejection, studies were performed in sublethally irradiated recipients of BM obtained from allogeneic MHC class II–/– mice that have a functional defect in donor APCs. Importantly, CpG ODNs did not significantly impair engraftment unless CD19+CD11b+ BM cells from wild-type mice were added to the MHC class II–/– donor BM inoculum (Table 3; experiment 1). These data implied that either the wild-type MHC class II+ donor BM CD19+ or the CD11b+ subset or both subsets could serve as the target cell for CpG ODN–mediated BM rejection.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. CpG ODN–mediated BM graft rejection is dependent upon functional donor BM APCs

 
To further investigate which donor APC subset was responsible for CpG ODN–mediated BM rejection, sublethally irradiated B6 mice were given BALB/c TLR9–/– BM. Cohorts of mice received either highly purified BALB/c wild-type DX5CD4CD8CD11cTCR{gamma}{delta}CD19-CD11b+ or DX5CD4CD8CD11cTCR{gamma}{delta}CD11bCD19+ BM cells added to the TLR9–/– donor BM inoculum. Only the add-back of donor wild-type CD11b+ BM cells induced CpG ODN–mediated BM rejection of the TLR9–/– BM, indicating that donor BM TLR9+CD11b+ but not TLR9+CD19+ cells were the target cells of CpG ODNs (Table 3; experiment 2).

As further evidence of the importance of donor APCs in modulating host antidonor rejection, B6 mice were irradiated with 5.0 Gy TBI and infused with 10 x 106 TCD BM from BALB/c wild-type or B7–1/B7–2–/– mice. CpG ODNs were not administered to any mice in this experiment. None of the 10 mice receiving wild-type BM engrafted. In contrast, 8 of 10 mice receiving B7–1/B7–2–/– BM had donor chimerism levels ranging from 86% to 98% as measured by PBL phenotyping 3 months after BMT (data not shown; P < .001). Collectively, these data indicate that TLR9 signaling of donor BM CD11b+ cells, but not CD19+ cells and not TLR9 signaling of host cells, was critical for CpG ODN–mediated BM rejection. These data further identify B7 ligands expressed on donor BM cells as an important factor in host rejection of donor BM.

Since the TLR7/8 agonist 3M-011 increased GVHD, it was also evaluated for its effect on engraftment. B6 mice were irradiated with 6.0 Gy TBI on d–1 and given 10 x 106 TCD BALB/c BM on d0; 3M-011 or drug vehicle was administered every other day for 2 weeks (1.0 mg/kg subcutaneously). Like CpG ODN, 3M-011 promoted BM rejection. Day 14 PCVs were significantly lower in 3M-011–treated mice, indicating accelerated BM rejection resulting in BM aplasia (12.9% vs 38.1% PCV; P < .001, n = 12-15/group; data not shown). Moreover, all 3M-011–treated recipients died by d34 compared with an 85% d60 survival rate in control mice (P < .001; n = 15/group; data not shown). These data indicated that acceleration of graft rejection by TLR ligation could be mediated by either a TLR9 or a TLR7/8 agonist.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
CpG ODNs have demonstrated efficacy in numerous animal models of infectious agents and tumors (reviewed in Krieg9,25). We showed that although beneficial for increased antitumor effects in syngeneic BMT, CpG ODNs increased the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect of DLI at the risk of increased GVHD in allogeneic BMT.26 Data presented here directly demonstrate that a TLR9-agonistic CpG ODN administered at the time of allogeneic BMT increased donor antihost and host antidonor T-cell responses, resulting in increased GVHD and increased rates of donor BM rejection, respectively. Similarly, a TLR7/8 agonist also increased GVHD mortality and promoted donor BM rejection, indicating that these findings were not unique to TLR9 stimulation. These data counsel caution in the use of TLR agonists in the early period following allogeneic BMT for the intended purpose of increasing GVL effects and/or promoting immune responses against infectious agents.

CpG ODN–mediated acceleration of GVHD was dependent on TLR9 ligation of host APCs and host IFN{gamma} production, but was independent of host NK cells, host IL-12 or IL-6 production, or TLR9 ligation of donor BM APCs. These data are consistent with reports implicating host APCs as being critical in optimal GVHD generation.4247 CpG ODNs given on d0 and d7 or a single injection on d7 were sufficient to accelerate GVHD mortality, the latter potentially due to a second burst of proinflammatory cytokine production, resulting in sustained expansion of effector T cells (data not shown). The effect of CpG ODNs on driving effector T-cell expansion was supported by d14 GFP+ effector imaging indicating markedly increased donor T-cell number in lymphoid and nonlymphoid organs. Moreover, the GVHD acceleration was potent since CpG ODNs significantly increased the d14 histologic GVHD scores in colon, liver, skin, and spleen as well as reduced the long-term survival of lethally irradiated mice that received only allogeneic donor BM with no supplemental T cells (data not shown). Although T-cell number in donor BM is low and donor inoculum was depleted of T cells, sufficient numbers of donor BM T cells may have escaped depletion to mediate GVHD tissue destruction sufficient to impair survival of CpG ODN–treated recipients. Alternatively, the release of proinflammatory cytokines induced by CpG ODNs may have resulted in tissue destruction independent of the donor T cells.45 Although CpG ODNs significantly impaired engraftment of mice conditioned with lower doses of irradiation, PBL phenotyping revealed that the reduced long-term survival of the lethally irradiated mice given allogeneic TCD donor BM was not due to poor engraftment (data not shown).

The results implicating host APCs as a critical target for CpG ODN–mediated GVHD acceleration were not so surprising given the data incriminating host APCs as the major target of GVHD effector T cells.4247 However, the results implicating donor APCs as the target for CpG ODN–mediated BM graft rejection were unexpected. Because CpG ODN is referred to as the universal vaccine due to the potent adjuvant-like, nonspecific immune stimulus delivered to the recipient's innate immune system,13,14,18,4852 we predicted that CpG ODN signaling of host TLR9 would be sufficient to increase rejection. We hypothesized that CpG ODN would ligate host TLR9, resulting in the increased production of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-12, IFN{gamma}, TNF{alpha}, and IL-6 that would amplify a host antidonor T-cell response sufficient to increase BM rejection regardless of the precise target cell or whether T cell–mediated rejection was the result of direct or indirect alloantigen recognition. Contrary to our expectations, CpG ODN promoted rejection in TLR9–/– recipients and even more surprising, CpG ODN did not promote rejection in wild-type recipients given TLR9–/– donor BM. Nor did CpG ODN significant impair engraftment of MHC class II–/– BM unless wild-type CD19+CD11b+ cells were added to the donor BM inoculum. These data implicated a donor APC as the target cell of CpG ODN–mediated rejection, although the precise APC subset was not identified. As TLR9 is expressed in many BM cell types, including myeloid cells and B cells, we hypothesized that either the CD19+ or CD11b+ BM subset could serve as the target cell for CpG ODN–mediated donor BM rejection. Contrary to expectations, only wild-type CD11b+ donor BM cells added to the TLR9–/– donor BM restored CpG ODN–mediated BM rejection. Imaging data indicate that donor BM homes to lymphoid organs very early after intravenous infusion.28 CpG ODN stimulation of TLR9+CD11b+ myeloid donor BM cells may result in an early burst of proinflammatory cytokines that amplifies and accelerates the host antidonor immune response locally in the microenvironment of secondary lymphoid organs where host T cells directly encounter donor BM. Perhaps it is the absence of proinflammatory cytokine production that makes wild-type TLR9+CD19+ donor BM cells unable to restore CpG ODN–mediated BM rejection. Alternatively, the array of costimulatory molecules induced and up-regulated on donor myeloid cells by TLR agonists may provide a more potent signal to rejecting host T cells compared with that induced and up-regulated on donor B-lineage cells.

Although these studies were undertaken to discover the mechanism behind CpG ODN–mediated graft rejection, the data identified an important and heretofore overlooked role for donor BM APCs in modulating the strength of the rejection process. The finding that costimulation-deficient B7–1/B7–2–/– allogeneic BM was far less likely than wild-type BM to be rejected further underscores the critical role of donor BM APCs and in particular APC B7 interactions in the BM rejection process. A critical role for donor APC B7 expression has also been demonstrated for the elicitation of resistance following transplantation of MHC-matched, minor antigen–disparate BM in reduced intensity–conditioned recipients (R.B.L., manuscript in preparation). It remains to be determined what other cell-surface molecules on donor BM cells play a role in BM rejection.

Finally, although not directly addressed, these data, implicating donor APCs as the cellular target of rejection, suggest that BM rejection is more likely to be the result of direct host T-cell recognition of alloantigen rather than indirect presentation of donor alloantigen by host APCs to host T cells.

Clinical intervention for the enhancement of BM engraftment has focused primarily on reducing the number and function of host T and NK cells. Our data suggest that donor BM APCs merit further investigation as potential therapeutic targets for the promotion of engraftment in BMT.


    Authorship
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Authorship
 References
 
Contribution: P.A.T. designed and executed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the paper; M.J.E. and C.J.L. executed experiments; A.P.-M. interpreted and scored histopathologic sections; A.M.K., A.H.S., W.J.M., J.S.S., H.H., S.A., and R.B.L. contributed unique reagents and insights; and B.R.B. designed experiments, analyzed data, and edited the paper.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: A.M.K. is an employee of Pfizer. The other authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Bruce Blazar, MMC 109, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455; e-mail: blaza001{at}umn.edu.


    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by NIH grants R01 AI034495, R37 HL56067, R01 HL63452 (B.R.B.) and P01 AI056299 (B.R.B. and A.H.S.).


    Footnotes
 
Submitted September 19, 2007; accepted June 27, 2008.

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, July 9, 2008 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-09-113670

An Inside Blood analysis of this article appears at the front of this issue.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Authorship
 References
 

  1. Ahonen CL, Gibson SJ, Smith RM, et al. Dendritic cell maturation and subsequent enhanced T-cell stimulation induced with the novel synthetic immune response modifier R-848. Cell Immunol. 1999;197:62–72.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  2. Ballas ZK, Rasmussen WL, Krieg AM. Induction of NK activity in murine and human cells by CpG motifs in oligodeoxynucleotides and bacterial DNA. J Immunol. 1996;157:1840–1845.[Abstract]

  3. Bauer S, Kirschning CJ, Hacker H, et al. Human TLR9 confers responsiveness to bacterial DNA via species-specific CpG motif recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:9237–9242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Gelman AE, Zhang J, Choi Y, Turka LA. Toll-like receptor ligands directly promote activated CD4+ T cell survival. J Immunol. 2004;172:6065–6073.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Hornung V, Rothenfusser S, Britsch S, et al. Quantitative expression of toll-like receptor 1-10 mRNA in cellular subsets of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and sensitivity to CpG oligodeoxynucleotides. J Immunol. 2002;168:4531–4537.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Janeway CA Jr, Medzhitov R. Innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:197–216.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  7. Kadowaki N, Ho S, Antonenko S, et al. Subsets of human dendritic cell precursors express different toll-like receptors and respond to different microbial antigens. J Exp Med. 2001;194:863–869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  8. Krieg AM. The role of CpG motifs in innate immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2000;12:35–43.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  9. Krieg AM. CpG motifs: the active ingredient in bacterial extracts? Nat Med. 2003;9:831–835.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  10. Krieg AM, Yi AK, Matson S, et al. CpG motifs in bacterial DNA trigger direct B-cell activation. Nature. 1995;374:546–549.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  11. Krug A, Towarowski A, Britsch S, et al. Toll-like receptor expression reveals CpG DNA as a unique microbial stimulus for plasmacytoid dendritic cells which synergizes with CD40 ligand to induce high amounts of IL-12. Eur J Immunol. 2001;31:3026–3037.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  12. Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F. Toll-like receptors and innate immunity in B-cell activation and antibody responses. Curr Opin Immunol. 2007;19:268–274.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  13. Liu HM, Newbrough SE, Bhatia SK, Dahle CE, Krieg AM, Weiner GJ. Immunostimulatory CpG oligodeoxynucleotides enhance the immune response to vaccine strategies involving granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Blood. 1998;92:3730–3736.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  14. Merad M, Sugie T, Engleman EG, Fong L. In vivo manipulation of dendritic cells to induce therapeutic immunity. Blood. 2002;99:1676–1682.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Ramirez-Pineda JR, Frohlich A, Berberich C, Moll H. Dendritic cells (DC) activated by CpG DNA ex vivo are potent inducers of host resistance to an intracellular pathogen that is independent of IL-12 derived from the immunizing DC. J Immunol. 2004;172:6281–6289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  16. Roda JM, Parihar R, Carson WE III. CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotides act through TLR9 to enhance the NK cell cytokine response to antibody-coated tumor cells. J Immunol. 2005;175:1619–1627.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  17. Sparwasser T, Vabulas RM, Villmow B, Lipford GB, Wagner H. Bacterial CpG-DNA activates dendritic cells in vivo: T helper cell-independent cytotoxic T cell responses to soluble proteins. Eur J Immunol. 2000;30:3591–3597.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  18. Wagner H. Bacterial CpG DNA activates immune cells to signal infectious danger. Adv Immunol. 1999;73:329–368.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  19. Chu RS, Targoni OS, Krieg AM, Lehmann PV, Harding CV. CpG oligodeoxynucleotides act as adjuvants that switch on T helper 1 (Th1) immunity. J Exp Med. 1997;186:1623–1631.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  20. Ishii KJ, Akira S. Innate immune recognition of, and regulation by, DNA. Trends Immunol. 2006;27:525–532.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  21. Krieg AM. CpG motifs in bacterial DNA and their immune effects. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:709–760.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  22. Krug A, Rothenfusser S, Hornung V, et al. Identification of CpG oligonucleotide sequences with high induction of IFN-alpha/beta in plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol. 2001;31:2154–2163.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  23. Roman M, Martin-Orozco E, Goodman JS, et al. Immunostimulatory DNA sequences function as T helper-1-promoting adjuvants. Nat Med. 1997;3:849–854.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  24. Wilson HL, Dar A, Napper SK, Marianela Lopez A, Babiuk LA, Mutwiri GK. Immune mechanisms and therapeutic potential of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides. Int Rev Immunol. 2006;25:183–213.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  25. Krieg AM. Development of TLR9 agonists for cancer therapy. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:1184–1194.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  26. Blazar BR, Krieg AM, Taylor PA. Synthetic unmethylated cytosine-phosphate-guanosine oligodeoxynucleotides are potent stimulators of antileukemia responses in naive and bone marrow transplant recipients. Blood. 2001;98:1217–1225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  27. Hammerbeck DM, Burleson GR, Schuller CJ, et al. Administration of a dual toll-like receptor 7 and toll-like receptor 8 agonist protects against influenza in rats. Antiviral Res. 2007;73:1–11.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  28. Taylor PA, Ehrhardt MJ, Roforth MM, et al. Preformed antibody, not primed T cells, is the initial and major barrier to bone marrow engraftment in allosensitized recipients. Blood. 2007;109:1307–1315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  29. Chakraverty R, Cote D, Buchli J, et al. An inflammatory checkpoint regulates recruitment of graft-versus-host reactive T cells to peripheral tissues. J Exp Med. 2006;203:2021–2031.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  30. Horng T, Barton GM, Flavell RA, Medzhitov R. The adaptor molecule TIRAP provides signalling specificity for Toll-like receptors. Nature. 2002;420:329–333.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  31. Yamamoto M, Sato S, Hemmi H, et al. Essential role for TIRAP in activation of the signalling cascade shared by TLR2 and TLR4. Nature. 2002;420:324–329.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  32. Agrawal S, Kandimalla ER. Synthetic agonists of Toll-like receptors 7, 8 and 9. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35:1461–1467.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  33. Dudek AZ, Yunis C, Harrison LI, et al. First in human phase I trial of 852A, a novel systemic toll-like receptor 7 agonist, to activate innate immune responses in patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:7119–7125.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  34. Hemmi H, Kaisho T, Takeuchi O, et al. Small anti-viral compounds activate immune cells via the TLR7 MyD88-dependent signaling pathway. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:196–200.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  35. Johnston D, Zaidi B, Bystryn JC. TLR7 imidazoquinoline ligand 3M-019 is a potent adjuvant for pure protein prototype vaccines. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2007;56:1133–1141.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  36. Kawai T, Akira S. Antiviral signaling through pattern recognition receptors. J Biochem. 2007;141:137–145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  37. Krieg AM, Vollmer J. Toll-like receptors 7, 8, and 9: linking innate immunity to autoimmunity. Immunol Rev. 2007;220:251–269.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  38. Miller RL, Meng TC, Tomai MA. The antiviral activity of Toll-like receptor 7 and 7/8 agonists. Drug News Perspect. 2008;21:69–87.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  39. Schon M, Schon MP. The antitumoral mode of action of imiquimod and other imidazoquinolines. Curr Med Chem. 2007;14:681–687.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  40. Schon MP, Schon M. TLR7 and TLR8 as targets in cancer therapy. Oncogene. 2008;27:190–199.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  41. Takeda K, Akira S. Toll-like receptors in innate immunity. Int Immunol. 2005;17:1–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  42. Duffner UA, Maeda Y, Cooke KR, et al. Host dendritic cells alone are sufficient to initiate acute graft-versus-host disease. J Immunol. 2004;172:7393–7398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  43. Merad M, Hoffmann P, Ranheim E, et al. Depletion of host Langerhans cells before transplantation of donor alloreactive T cells prevents skin graft-versus-host disease. Nat Med. 2004;10:510–517.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  44. Shlomchik WD, Couzens MS, Tang CB, et al. Prevention of graft versus host disease by inactivation of host antigen-presenting cells. Science. 1999;285:412–415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  45. Teshima T, Ordemann R, Reddy P, et al. Acute graft-versus-host disease does not require alloantigen expression on host epithelium. Nat Med. 2002;8:575–581.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  46. Zhang Y, Louboutin JP, Zhu J, Rivera AJ, Emerson SG. Preterminal host dendritic cells in irradiated mice prime CD8+ T cell-mediated acute graft-versus-host disease. J Clin Invest. 2002;109:1335–1344.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  47. Zhang Y, Shlomchik WD, Joe G, et al. APCs in the liver and spleen recruit activated allogeneic CD8+ T cells to elicit hepatic graft-versus-host disease. J Immunol. 2002;169:7111–7118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  48. Amlie-Lefond C, Paz DA, Connelly MP, Huffnagle GB, Whelan NT, Whelan HT. Innate immunity for biodefense: a strategy whose time has come. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;116:1334–1342.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  49. Daubenberger CA. TLR9 agonists as adjuvants for prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2007;9:45–52.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  50. Klinman DM, Verthelyi D, Takeshita F, Ishii KJ. Immune recognition of foreign DNA: a cure for bioterrorism? Immunity. 1999;11:123–129.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  51. McCluskie MJ, Krieg AM. Enhancement of infectious disease vaccines through TLR9-dependent recognition of CpG DNA. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2006;311:155–178.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  52. Weiner GJ, Liu HM, Wooldridge JE, Dahle CE, Krieg AM. Immunostimulatory oligodeoxynucleo-tides containing the CpG motif are effective as immune adjuvants in tumor antigen immunization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:10833–10837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Donor dendritic cells dance the do-si-do in allogeneic transplantation
Edmund K. Waller and Jian-Ming Li
Blood 2008 112: 3007-3008. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. Chen, E. Ahmed, T. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Ochando, A. S. Chong, and M.-L. Alegre
TLR Signals Promote IL-6/IL-17-Dependent Transplant Rejection
J. Immunol., May 15, 2009; 182(10): 6217 - 6225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
J. Wilson, H. Cullup, R. Lourie, Y. Sheng, A. Palkova, K. J. Radford, A. M. Dickinson, A. M. Rice, D. N.J. Hart, and D. J. Munster
Antibody to the dendritic cell surface activation antigen CD83 prevents acute graft-versus-host disease
J. Exp. Med., February 16, 2009; 206(2): 387 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2007-09-113670v1
112/8/3508    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Blazar, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Blazar, B. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Transplantation
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020