Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 11 June 2009, Vol. 113, No. 24, pp. 6043-6044.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, J. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, J. L.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

InsideBlood

IMMUNOBIOLOGY

Comment on Kang et al, page 6128

4.1R: a FERM player at the immunologic synapse

Judy L. Cannon

UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO

In this issue of Blood, Kang and colleagues show that 4.1R localizes to the immunologic synapse to negatively regulate T-cell activation. These findings contrast with other FERM family members and show that FERM proteins affect T-cell function through multiple mechanisms.

T-cell activation requires the coordination of signaling events downstream of T-cell receptor (TCR) ligation with intracellular cytoskeletal reorganization, leading to T-cell effector function. Regulators of the actin cytoskeleton have been shown to be critical mediators of the formation of the immunologic synapse and productive T-cell activation.1 4.1 proteins belong to a larger FERM (FERM: F-4.1, E-ezrin, R-radixin, M-moesin) family of cytoskeletal regulators, which also include the ERM (ezrin-radixin-moesin) proteins. In T cells, ERM proteins were initially identified as canonical markers of the pole opposite to the immunologic synapse (distal pole complex, DPC),2,3 and perturbing ERM function leads to defects in T-cell activation.4 4.1R is a key player in determining erythrocyte shape and function, but until now, its function in T cells has been unknown. This new study by Kang et al provides the first description of the role of 4.1R in T cells.5


Figure 1
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Localization of 4.1R in T cells. See the complete figure in the article beginning on page 6128.

 
Kang and colleagues find that, compared with wild-type T cells, 4.1R-deficient T cells are hyperproliferative. 4.1R deficiency also leads to increased cytokine production by T cells and hyperphosphorylation of 2 key signaling intermediates downstream of T-cell activation, LAT and ERK. 4.1R colocalizes with LAT at the site of TCR activation (see figure) and mediates its effects on T-cell activation through direct association with LAT. 4.1R binding to LAT inhibits LAT phosphorylation by ZAP-70. These results show that 4.1R is a negative regulator of T-cell function through effects on LAT phosphorylation.

Interestingly, while 4.1R and ERM proteins share significant sequence homology, this report shows that 4.1R and ERM family members play fundamentally opposing roles in their regulation of T-cell activation. ERM proteins move negative regulators to the DPC to positively regulate T-cell activation, while 4.1R localizes to the immunologic synapse to negatively regulate T-cell signaling. 4.1R negatively regulates T-cell activation via binding to LAT to inhibit LAT phosphorylation. Like ERM proteins, 4.1R binds both the actin cytoskeleton and signaling molecules downstream of TCR ligation. However, unlike ERM proteins that localize binding partners away from the immunologic synapse via its interaction with the actin cytoskeleton, 4.1R does not appear to move its binding partner LAT in order to regulate its phosphorylation. Instead, 4.1R colocalizes with LAT and ZAP-70 at the synapse. These results show that 4.1R and ERM proteins differ in the mechanism by which each links the actin cytoskeleton and signaling molecules downstream of the TCR. While the precise mechanism by which 4.1R mediates the inhibition of LAT phosphorylation by ZAP-70 remains to be determined, Kang et al contribute to our broader understanding of how actin cytoskeletal regulators can affect T-cell signaling and function.

Footnotes

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author declares no competing financial interests. {blacksquare}

REFERENCES

  1. Burkhardt JK, Carrizosa E, Shaffer MH. The actin cytoskeleton in T-cell activation. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26:233–259.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  2. Allenspach EJ, Cullinan P, Tong J, et al. ERM-dependent movement of CD43 defines a novel protein complex distal to the immunological synapse. Immunity. 2001;15:739–750.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  3. Delon J, Kaibuchi K, Germain RN. Exclusion of CD43 from the immunological synapse is mediated by phosphorylation-regulated relocation of the cytoskeletal adaptor moesin. Immunity. 2001;15:691–701.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. Shaffer MH, Dupree RS, Zhu P, et al. Ezrin and moesin function together to promote T cell activation. J Immunol. 2009;182:1021–1032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Kang Q, Yu Y, Pei X, et al. Cytoskeletal protein 4.1R negatively regulates T-cell activation by inhibiting the phosphorylation of LAT. Blood. 2009;113:6128–6137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Cytoskeletal protein 4.1R negatively regulates T-cell activation by inhibiting the phosphorylation of LAT
Qiaozhen Kang, Yu Yu, Xinhong Pei, Richard Hughes, Susanne Heck, Xihui Zhang, Xinhua Guo, Gregory Halverson, Narla Mohandas, and Xiuli An
Blood 2009 113: 6128-6137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, J. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, J. L.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020