|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blood, 9 July 2009, Vol. 114, No. 2, pp. 230-231.
Visualize eHPCs in different zonesSTOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH
In this issue of Blood, Köhler and colleagues developed a time-lapse intravital imaging method to observe BM cells within long bones of live mice, and found that aged eHPCs localized more distantly to the endosteum than young eHPCs.
Recently, 2 labs have developed imaging technologies using 2-photon microscopy that allow for observation of HSCs in their niches in real time, both in vivo and ex vivo. Lo Celso and colleagues have monitored the behavior of individual hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in the calvarium BM of live mice.6 Xie and colleagues have established a new method for ex vivo imaging stem cells (EVISCs) to trace the homing of purified green fluorescent protein (GFP)–expressing HSCs.7 Both groups determined the distribution patterns of homed HSCs and examined the relationship of transplanted HSCs with blood vessels and osteoblastic cells. The primary conclusion obtained from these 2 studies is that HSCs localize predominantly closer to the endosteum, while more differentiated progenitors reside progressively farther away,6 indicative of the important role the endosteum plays in supporting HSCs. Surprisingly, both studies found that osteoblastic and vascular components are not far apart from each other as expected, but coexist in the endosteal zone. However, in the central marrow (CM) zone where vasculature is dominant, the endosteal and CM zones can form different microenvironments for HSCs, the former being more inhibitory and the latter more stimulatory. In this issue of Blood, Köhler et al establish a multiphoton intravital microscopy technique to visualize the interaction of immature hematopoietic cells and stromal cells in the endosteal microenvironment of live mouse tibias.8 They find that aged early hematopoietic progenitor cells (eHPCs) increased changes in cell volume and surface area compared with young eHPCs. Furthermore, aged eHPCs localize farther away from the endosteum than do young eHPCs, with the former displaying significantly reduced adhesion to stromal cells. Using certain cytoskeletal molecules as polarization markers, they observe that aged eHPCs have defects in their adhesive ability. This reduction in adhesion is also reciprocally correlated with elevated protrusion movements, resulting in distant localization from the endosteum. These data for the first time reveal profound location differences within BM between young and aged eHPCs. Together, these findings suggest that alterations in stem cell property during aging, such as reduced self-renewal and altered differentiation, are, at least in part, due to changes in localization of hematopoietic cells within the marrow microenvironment, away from the endosteal zone. This indicates there are different zones in BM. The novel technique discussed above and in this issue of Blood allows researchers to monitor the behavior of individual HSCs and their dynamic interactions with niches in vivo and ex vivo in various skeletal sites in mice. Although the techniques can be further improved, such as observing the behavior of endogenous HSCs and successfully conducting lineage tracing studies in vivo, this new method is ready to address many important biological questions.
Footnotes
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
REFERENCES
  CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
Related Article in Blood Online:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
| Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||
