Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 30 July 2009, Vol. 114, No. 5, pp. 930-931.

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, D.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

InsideBlood

CLINICAL TRIALS

Comment on Witt et al, page 952

Avoiding "sticker" shock

David Green

NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY

Abstract

In this issue of Blood, Witt and colleagues show that it is safe to alter the frequency of laboratory monitoring from every 4 weeks to every 8 weeks in stable patients on long-term anticoagulant therapy.1

Long-term administration of a coumarin drug is currently the only option for chronic oral anticoagulation therapy in the United States. Coumarins are effective and inexpensive, but close monitoring and frequent dose adjustments are usually required to achieve the desired antithrombotic effect and avoid bleeding. Monitoring requires venipuncture, performing a prothrombin time, and calculating the International Normalized Ratio (INR). Studies have established that an INR of 2 to 3 (or 2.5 to 3.5 in patients with mechanical heart valves) best balances safety and efficacy. The task of the clinician is to determine the dose of drug that consistently produces an INR in the therapeutic range. Current recommendations call for testing to begin 2 to 3 days after therapy is initiated. Once the INR is therapeutic, the monitoring frequency is decreased to 2 to 3 times weekly for 1 to 2 weeks, and if the INR remains in the therapeutic range, eventually to once every 4 weeks for as long as the patient is on the drug.2 Patients whose INRs remain in the therapeutic range on repeated testing are considered to have achieved stable anticoagulation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Explanations to patients taking coumarins (5)

 
Can the frequency of monitoring be decreased in patients on stable anticoagulation? This question has been addressed by Witt et al in this issue of Blood. They conducted an observational study of more than 6000 patients followed by a centralized clinical pharmacy anticoagulation service. Forty-one percent had all INR values within the therapeutic reference interval for a continuous 6-month interval (stable patients), and the remainder (59%) served as comparator patients. Patients had at least 1 INR determination every 8 weeks. In the comparator group, only 47% of INR values were in the therapeutic range, and this group had a significantly higher rate of bleeding (2.8% vs 0.8%; P < .001). Stable patients were less likely to have a goal INR ≥ 3.0 (OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.38-0.61). Other predictors of a stable INR were age older than 70, and absence of diabetes, heart failure, or other chronic disease. Thus, the authors have identified and characterized patients potentially requiring less frequent anticoagulant monitoring. To confirm that such patients can be safely managed with less testing, they suggest a prospective trial of stably anticoagulated patients in whom the interval between INR determinations is progressively increased to 8 or even 12 weeks.

While such a suggestion is reasonable, the dismal track record of coumarins with respect to bleeding must be recognized. Despite careful monitoring of anticoagulant intensity, the risk of major hemorrhage in several large clinical trials has ranged from 0.3% to 0.5% per year as compared with controls,3 and during long-term anticoagulation, 1.1% per patient-year.4 Some of the hemorrhages might have occurred because of unpredictable events such as intercurrent illnesses or trauma. Changes in patient medications and use of nonprescription drugs and alcohol might have precipitated other bleeding events. Perhaps the best approach to limit these complications is a well-informed patient. In this regard, the 10 key issues for patient explanation (see table) are as valid today as they were when published 25 years ago by Errichetti et al.5 These issues should be continually reinforced while patients are taking these drugs. Well-educated patients who have achieved stable anticoagulation are candidates for less frequent monitoring and fewer needle sticks.

Footnotes

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author declares no competing financial interests. {blacksquare}

REFERENCES

  1. Witt DM, Delate T, Clark NP, et al. Outcomes and predictors of very stable INR control during chronic anticoagulation therapy. Blood. 2009;114:952–956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Ansell J, Hirsh J, Hylek E, et al. Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists. Chest. 2008;133:160S–198S.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  3. Schulman S, Beyth RJ, Kearon C, et al. Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant and thrombolytic treatment. Chest. 2008;133:257S–298S.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. Ost D, Tepper J, Mihara H, et al. Duration of anticoagulation following venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2005;294:706–715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Errichetti AM, Holden A, Ansell J. Management of oral anticoagulant therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1984;144:1966–1968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Outcomes and predictors of very stable INR control during chronic anticoagulation therapy
Daniel M. Witt, Thomas Delate, Nathan P. Clark, Chad Martell, Thu Tran, Mark A. Crowther, David A. Garcia, Walter Ageno, and Elaine M. Hylek, on behalf of the Warfarin Associated Research Projects and other EnDeavors (WARPED) Consortium
Blood 2009 114: 952-956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, D.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020