Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 20 August 2009, Vol. 114, No. 8, pp. 1717.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mead, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Drayson, M. T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mead, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Drayson, M. T.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

CORRESPONDENCE

Sensitivity of serum free light chain measurement of residual disease in multiple myeloma patients

To the editor:

We were interested to read the communication from Singhal et al.1 However, there is a misconception that serum free light chain (sFLC) measurement should provide the most sensitive measure of residual disease in all multiple myeloma patients. This appears to have arisen because normalization of the sFLC ratio has been included as one of the criteria necessary for achieving a "stringent complete response" in the proposed international response criteria.2

In fact, sFLC measurement provides a more sensitive measure of residual disease in some, but not all, myeloma patients. For patients whose tumors produce monoclonal light chains only (LCO), sFLC measurement will generally be more sensitive because (1) serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) are poor at detecting FLC, and (2) the sensitivity of urinalysis is restricted by the kidneys' capacity for reabsorbing and catabolizing FLC.3 Retrospective studies showed sFLC measurement could have aided diagnosis and monitoring in 19 of 28 nonsecretory myeloma patients4 and 224 of 224 LCO myeloma patients.3 Twenty-six of 82 non-intensively treated LCO patients became IFE-negative in the urine, but 17 of these 26 patients had abnormal sFLC, indicating their maximum response was a partial response (PR) rather than complete response (CR).3 Prospective study of 223 LCO patients in the MRC Myeloma IX trial showed 16 of 69 patients who had a PR by sFLC were IFE-negative in the urine. Furthermore, in 12 of 42 LCO patients, progression was detected by sFLC before their urine became IFE-positive.5 In the same prospective study, light chain escape occurred in 5.3% IgG patients and 14.8% IgA patients.

However, for patients producing monoclonal intact immunoglobulins, the relative sensitivity of IFE and sFLC measurement will depend upon the quantities of protein being produced. It has previously been reported that approximately 5% of myeloma patients with monoclonal intact immunoglobulin produce no detectable monoclonal sFLC at presentation.6,7 FLC ratios are only likely to be the more sensitive marker of residual disease in patients who have a relatively high production of FLC and certainly not in the approximately 5% of patients who apparently produce none.

A preliminary study by Kumar et al8 has indicated that normalization of the sFLC ratio is a meaningful measure, associated with superior overall survival in myeloma patients achieving an IFE-negative response. For myeloma patients with monoclonal intact immunoglobulin and FLC, the persistence of abnormal sFLC, after becoming negative by IFE, could indicate the presence of tumor cells producing more FLC than intact immunoglobulin. Alternatively, it could result from the presence of a subclone of tumor cells producing FLCs only.9 This latter phenomenon is more familiar when it is manifested at relapse as light chain escape.

Singhal and colleagues were right to highlight the more rapid falls shown by sFLC in response to successful therapy, which is due to the much shorter serum half-life of FLC (4-6 hours) compared with intact immunoglobulin (~ 6 days IgA, ~ 21 days IgG). However, it is wrong to conclude that normalization of the sFLC ratio will invariably predict an IFE-negative response.

Authorship

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: G.P.M. is an employee of The Binding Site, who manufacture assays for free light chain measurement. M.T.D. declares no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Graham Peter Mead, University of Birmingham and The Binding Site, PO Box 11712, Birmingham, United Kingdom; e-mail: g.p.mead{at}bham.ac.uk.

Graham Peter Mead, and Mark Trehane Drayson
University of Birmingham and The Binding Site, Birmingham, United Kingdom University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

References

  1. Singhal S, Vickrey E, Krishnamurthy J, Singh V, Allen S, Mehta J. The relationship between the serum free light chain assay and serum immunofixation electrophoresis, and the definition of concordant and discordant free light chain ratios. Blood. 2009;114(1):38–39.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Durie BGM, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2006;20(9):1467–1473.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  3. Bradwell AR, Carr-Smith HD, Mead GP, Harvey TC, Drayson MT. Serum test for assessment of patients with Bence Jones myeloma. Lancet. 2003;361:489–491.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. Drayson M, Tang LX, Drew R, Mead GP, Carr-Smith H, Bradwell AR. Serum free light chain measurements for identifying and monitoring patients with nonsecretory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2002;97(9):2900–2902.[CrossRef]

  5. Drayson MT, Morgan GJ, Jackson GH, et al. Prospective study of serum FLC and other M-protein assays: when and how to measure response? [abstract]. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2009;9(S1, Abstract 346.

  6. Mead GP, Carr-Smith HD, Drayson MT, Morgan GT, Child JA, Bradwell AR. Serum free light chains for monitoring multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2004;126:348–354.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  7. Snozek CLH, Katzmann JA, Kyle RA, et al. Prognostic value of the serum free light chain ratio in newly diagnosed myeloma: proposed incorporation into the international staging system. Leukemia. 2008;22:1933–1937.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  8. Kumar S, Dispenzieri A, Larson D, et al. Normalization of the serum free light chain (FLC) ratio is associated with superior overall survival among myeloma patients achieving immunofixation negative state: results support incorporation of serum FLC ratio in stringent CR definition [abstract]. Blood. 2008;112: Abstract 1692.

  9. Ayliffe MJ, Davies FE, de Castro D, Morgan GM. Demonstration of changes in plasma cell subsets in multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2007;92(8):1135–1138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

The relationship between the serum free light chain assay and serum immunofixation electrophoresis, and the definition of concordant and discordant free light chain ratios
Seema Singhal, Eric Vickrey, Jairam Krishnamurthy, Veerpal Singh, Sharon Allen, and Jayesh Mehta
Blood 2009 114: 38-39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mead, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Drayson, M. T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mead, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Drayson, M. T.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020