|
|
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Blood, Vol. 90 No. 1 (July 1), 1997:
pp. 306-312
RAR 1/RAR 2-PML mRNA Expression in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Cells: A Molecular and Laboratory-Clinical Correlative Study
By
Yun-Ping Li,
Janet Andersen,
Arthur Zelent,
Sreenivas Rao,
Elisabeth Paietta,
Martin S. Tallman,
Peter H. Wiernik, and
Robert E. Gallagher
From the Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Bronx, NY; the Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; the Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL; and the Leukaemia Research Fund, London, UK.
 |
ABSTRACT |
In addition to the major fusion gene PML-RAR , the t(15; 17) in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) produces the reciprocal fusion gene RAR -PML. To determine the scope of RAR -containing mRNA expression in APL cells, we tested PML-RAR -positive APL cells for the presence of mRNAs initiated from two distinct RAR gene promoters, 1 and 2. From the normal allele, both RAR 1 and RAR 2 mRNAs were expressed in all APL cases (N = 24). From the translocated allele, RAR 1-PML mRNA was expressed in 77% and RAR 2-PML mRNA in 28% of cases (N = 98). RAR 2-PML mRNA was not observed in the absence of RAR 1-PML mRNA. There was no association between RAR 1-PML or RAR 2-PML mRNA expression and the type of PML-RAR mRNA formed by either 5' or 3' breaksites in the PML gene. RAR 1-PML mRNAs and RAR 2-PML mRNAs from 5' PML breaksite cases coded for full-length RAR -PML proteins but RAR 2-PML mRNAs from 3' PML breaksite cases encoded a truncated RAR 2 peptide. RAR 1/ 2-PML mRNA expression was not associated with differences in APL cell sensitivity to all-trans retinoic acid(tRA)-induced differentiation in vitro or in clinical outcome after tRA or chemotherapy induction therapy (protocol E2491). Our analysis indicated that RAR 1/ 2-PML mRNA expression markedly differs from normal RAR 1/ 2 mRNA expression, that the difference in RAR 1-PML and RAR 2-PML mRNA expression frequency is primarily related to the genomic separation of the RAR 1 and RAR 2 coding exons, and that variations in RAR 1/ 2-PML mRNA expression likely have no clinically relevant function in APL cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
THE t(15; 17) associated with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) results in the formation of two reciprocal fusion genes, PML-RAR and RAR -PML. Because hybrid mRNA for the PML-RAR fusion gene is expressed in virtually all APL cases, and because it encodes the most essential functional domains of both fusion gene proteins, it is regarded as the critical product for both the genesis and maintenance of the disease.1-5 RAR -PML mRNA has been reported to be expressed in 67% to 80% of APL cases.6,7 The putative proteins coded by RAR -PML contain the A-region of RAR that has ligand-independent modulatory effects on the transcriptional regulatory activity of RAR , a short common region of PML encoded by exon 7 that contains a unique casein kinase II phosphorylation site, and a variety of serine/proline-rich segments in different transcripts caused by variable PML exon splicing.6,8 Although this information content seems limited, RAR -PML has been considered to have potential biological significance, because the coding exons are consistently retained, ie, they are not deleted in the translocation process,9 and because the translational open reading frame (ORF ) is maintained in RAR -PML-positive cases.6 The possibility that RAR -PML may have selective value for the leukemic phenotype was recently stimulated by the report of a t(15; 17)-negative APL case with cryptic formation of an RAR -PML fusion gene in the absence of PML-RAR .10
The current study was performed to evaluate essentially three questions related to RAR -PML mRNA expression in APL cells. First, what is the extent of heterogeneity of RAR -PML mRNA expression, taking into consideration that two different forms of RAR (RAR 1 and RAR 2) have been reported in some mammalian cells11 and that previous APL cell studies only measured RAR 1-PML mRNA expression?6,7,10 Normal RAR 1 and RAR 2 mRNA expression is governed by two independent gene promoters, and the respective proteins differ at the amino end because of alternative selection of exons encoding either the A1 or A2 region joined to a common body of the RAR molecule, the B to F regions.11 Second, is there any relationship of heterogeneity in RAR 1-PML and/or RAR 2-PML mRNA expression and the type of PML-RAR mRNA expressed in the same APL cells? In individual APL cases, one of three possible types of PML-RAR mRNA is expressed because of alternative break sites in the PML gene, one 5'-situated (in intron 3, the short(S)-form type) and two 3'-situated (in intron 6, the long(L)-form type, or in variable sites in exon 6, the variable(V)-form type).4,5,12 Third, is there any relationship between the heterogeneity of RAR 1/ 2-PML mRNA expression and important biological characteristics measured by differences in APL cell responsiveness to all-trans retinoic acid (tRA)-induced differentiation in vitro and by differences in patient pretreatment characteristics or responsiveness to therapy? The latter could be investigated because most RNA specimens were derived from APL patients entered on a randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of tRA versus standard chemotherapy as remission induction therapy (Protocol INT 0129/E2491).13
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Patients and pretreatment clinical laboratory studies.
Of the 98 PML-RAR -positive patients involved in this study, 72 were participants in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) clinical trial E2491. The other 26 PML-RAR -positive as well as the 38 PML-RAR -negative patients were derived from ECOG ancillary study E1485. Patient materials were obtained under an ECOG protocol-approved consent form and/or individual institutional review board approval. Baseline patient data were obtained from the ECOG central data registry and hemogram parameters, eg, white blood cell (WBC) counts, represent the presenting values before antileukemic therapy.
Cell preparation and culture.
Heparinized bone marrow BM and peripheral blood (PB) specimens were received by overnight express mail from ECOG institutions at room temperature. A low-density WBC fraction (d 1.077 g/mL) was isolated and evaluated as previously described.12 Only low-density cell fractions with 75% myeloblasts/promyelocytes were used for cell culture studies and for the assessment of RAR 1 and RAR 2 mRNA expression. Cell culture procedures for the assessment of APL cell tRA sensitivity to tRA in vitro were as previously described.14,15
RT-PCR analysis.
Total cellular RNA was prepared by a modification of the guanidine isothiocyanate extraction-cesium chloride gradient ultracentrifugation procedure, as previously described,14 or using the TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD), according to the supplier's directions. Reverse transcription of RNA from random hexamer primers (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) and PCR were performed essentially as previously described,14 except that amplification conditions were modified to be optimal for each primer pair used. Primer pairs and conditions for their application were selected with the assistance of OligoTM software (National Biosciences, Inc, Plymouth, MN). The upstream and downstream primers used to amplify first strand cDNA for each gene/hybrid gene transcript were as follows: RAR 1, 5'-GCCAGGCGCTCTGACCACTC-3' and 5'-AGCCCTTGCAGCCCTCACAG-3'; RAR 2, 5'-CCACCCCTAATCCCTTCCTA-3' and 5'-AGCCCTTGCAGCCCTCACAG-3'; RAR 1-PML, 5'-TCCCTACGCCTTCTTCTTCC-3' and 5'-CCGAGCTGCTGATCACCACA-3'; and RAR 2-PML, 5'-CCACCCCTAATCCCTTCCTA-3' and 5'-CCGAGCTGCTGATCACCACA-3'. The housekeeping gene, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH) was used as an RNA integrity control by a competitive RT-PCR method, and primers and RT-PCR conditions for the determination of PML-RAR type were as previously described.12 The relative intensity of ethidium bromide-stained PCR gel electrophoretic bands were determined by densitometric volume measurements using a scanning laser densitometer and ImageQuant software analysis (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
DNA sequence analysis.
The nucleotide sequences of the junctions between exons 2 or 3 of the A1- or A2-regions of RAR 1 and RAR 2 and exon 4 of the common B-region of RAR in RAR 1/ 2 mRNAs and between RAR exons 2 or 3 and PML exons 4 or 7 in RAR 1/ 2-PML mRNAs were determined by bidirectional direct sequencing, as previously described.14
Statistical methods.
Univariate differences between dichotomous variables were evaluated with Fisher's Exact test.16 Differences in the distribution of disease free survival (DFS) were compared between groups with a log-rank test.17 Survival curves were estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier.18
 |
RESULTS |
Expression of RAR 1 and RAR 2 mRNAs in APL cells.
Using RT-PCR with an upstream primer specific for the A1-region of RAR 1 or the A2-region of RAR 2 in combination with a common downstream primer anchored in the C-region of RAR (Fig 1), constitutive expression of RAR 1 and RAR 2 mRNA was readily detected in pretreatment BM or PB cell preparations containing 75% leukemic promyelocytes or blasts in 24/24 PML-RAR -positive APL cases tested (data not shown). Experiments in which the RAR 2-specific primer was competed with an equal amount of RAR 1-specific primer in the same reaction tube indicated that RAR 2 mRNA was expressed at a lower level than RAR 1 mRNA in all of 17 cases tested (Fig 2). The mean and median ratios of RAR 2 to RAR 1 were, respectively, 0.58 ± 0.14 and 0.60, range 0.35 to 0.78. The RAR 2 to RAR 1 mRNA ratio was similar for low-density mononuclear cells from normal BM and PB. No ratio could be determined for the APL cell line NB4, because the RAR 2 signal was completely competed by the RAR 1 signal (Fig 2). In the absence of the RAR 1 primer competitor, a low level of RAR 2 mRNA was detectable in NB4 cell RNA under the same RT-PCR conditions (data not shown).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 1.
Schematic representation of the intron-exon structure of relevant parts of the RAR and PML genes and of the formation of RAR 2 mRNA and of RAR 2-PML mRNAs from APL cases with S-form or L/V-forms of PML-RAR mRNA. Introns are represented by heavy lines. The boxes in the top (RAR gene) and lower (PML gene) panels indicate exons. The dashed lines indicate how RAR exons are joined to form RAR 1 or RAR 2 mRNAs. The asterisk indicates the RARE site in the promoter region of RAR 2. Open boxes indicate noncoding regions. The simple hatched areas indicate the coding regions of RAR 1 (A1) and RAR 2 (A2), which become fused to the variable PML carboxy-termini in RAR -PML mRNAs. Stippled boxes indicate PML exons (P4, P5, P6, P7a, and P7b), which are variably spliced in different PML-containing isoforms. Cross-hatched boxes indicate coding regions that are consistently retained in RAR - or PML-containing transcripts. ckII is the unique casein kinase-II site in constantly retained region of PML exon 7. Arrowheads indicate the site of PCR primers used in the present studies. The perijunctional nucleotide sequence and codon assignment is indicated below the schematic RAR 2 and RAR 2-PML mRNAs with the sequence derived from RAR exon 3 italicized and the junctional codon (derived from the last nucleotide of RAR 2 exon 3 and the first two nucleotides of RAR exon 4/B-region, PML exon 4 or PML exon 7) underlined.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 2.
Gel electrophoretic analysis of ethidium bromide-stained DNA products synthesized in primer competition experiments from RAR 2 mRNA (upper band) or RAR 1 mRNA (lower band). Five picomoles each of upstream primers specific for RAR 1 or RAR 2 were used with 10 pmol of a common downstream primer anchored in the C-region of RAR to amplify 1 µg-RNA equivalent of cDNA, as described in Materials and Methods. The abbreviations are: M, 100-bp ladder; L1 to L3, products from 3 APL patients with L-form PML-RAR mRNA; V1, product from an APL patient with V-form PML-RAR mRNA; S1 and S2, products from 2 APL patients with S-form PML-RAR mRNA; NB4, product from APL cell line NB4 mRNA; BM, product from normal bone marrow; PB, product from normal peripheral blood. All illustrated APL RNAs were derived from specimens containing greater than 90% blasts plus promyelocytes.
|
|
Expression of RAR 1-PML and RAR 2-PML mRNAs in APL cells.
RAR 1-PML and RAR 2-PML are formed, using normal splicing signals by joining the 3' terminus of RAR exon 2 or exon 3, respectively, to the 5'-terminus of either PML exon 4 (S-form PML-RAR cases) or exon 7 (L- and V-form PML-RAR cases)6 (Fig 1). In L-form and V-form cases, only one gel electrophoretic band was visualized (Fig 3), because the alternatively spliced exons are retained in the reciprocal PML-RAR product,4,12 and because the exon 6 breaksite in V-form cases lacks an appropriate splice acceptor site.6 In S-form cases, three specific gel bands were observed because of alternative splicing between PML exons 4, 5, and 6. The upper band represents full-length RAR 1-PML or RAR 2-PML RNAs, ie, PML exons 4 to 7 are present; the middle band lacks PML exon 5; and the lower band lacks PML exons 5 and 66 (confirmed by our sequencing results).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 3.
Gel electrophoretic analysis of ethidium bromide-stained RT-PCR products generated from mRNAs encoding RAR 1-PML (left panel) or RAR 2-PML (right panel) from L-form, V-form, and S-form PML-RAR mRNA type cases, including one atypical S-form case (Sv). M is Hae III-digested X174 DNA marker; 0 is 0 RNA control.
|
|
Of 98 PML-RAR -positive cases tested, RAR 1-PML mRNA was detected in 75 cases (77%) and RAR 2-PML mRNA in 27 cases (28%). RAR 2-PML mRNA was never detected in the absence of RAR 1-PML mRNA. NB4 cells, which contain the L-form of PML-RAR , expressed RAR 1-PML but not RAR 2-PML mRNA. The typical gel electrophoretic band pattern described above was observed in all but one S-form case (Sv) in which all three bands were coordinately reduced in size because of the absence of exon 4 (Fig 3).
RAR -PML mRNA junctional sequence analyses.
Compared with the amino acid codons formed by inter-exonic splicing of normal RAR 1 or PML transcripts, a novel codon is generated at the RAR 1-PML junction in both S-form (ATT; asparagine) and L/V-form cases (AAG; lysine) of APL with maintenance of the translational ORF 6 (confirmed by our sequencing results). Similarly, in RAR 2-PML-positive S-form APL cases, the ORF is maintained with a change in the junctional codon from the TCC (serine) of normal RAR 2 to TAT (tyrosine) (Fig 1). In L- and V-form cases, however, the junctional codon changes to an amber termination codon (TAG), such that the translation product is limited to the A2 region of RAR 2 (Fig 1). Also, in the single Sv noted to lack PML exon 4 in RAR 1-PML mRNA (Fig 3), sequence analysis confirmed that the splicing events altered the ORF for all three RAR 1-PML isoforms, each of which encodes only the A1 region of RAR 1 with a short carboxy-terminus of non-PML amino acids (data not shown).
RAR 1/ 2-PML mRNA expression and PML-RAR fusion gene type.
As summarized in Table 1, 22% to 25% of cases lacked RAR 1-PML mRNA expression and, conversely, 75% to 78% of cases expressed RAR 1-PML mRNA in all three PML-RAR mRNA types. In contrast to this tight range of values, the fraction of RAR 2-PML mRNA expressors varied from 19% in S-form cases to 50% in V-form cases or 33% in L-form plus V-form cases, although these differences did not achieve statistical significance (P .17).
Tests for RAR 1-PML mRNA in PML-RAR -negative leukemia cells.
Thirty-eight leukemic cell specimens submitted to our laboratory with the suspected diagnosis of APL based on initial clinical evaluation and/or the immunophenotypic profile that, subsequently, turned out to be PML-RAR mRNA-negative were tested for the expression of RAR 1-PML mRNA. All tests were negative.
Studies for possible correlation with in vitro APL tRA sensitivity.
In vitro tests for tRA-induced terminal differentiation were performed in the majority of PML-RAR -positive cases analyzed for RAR 1-PML and RAR 2-PML mRNA expression, by the nitroblue tetrazolium dye reduction (NBT) test in 79 cases, and by the expression of CD11b, a surface membrane antigen marker for terminal myeloid cell differentiation, in 67 cases. As summarized in Table 2, no correlation was observed by either of these measures at 10-7 mol/L tRA (P .37) or by the NBT test at 10-8 mol/L tRA (data not shown). At 10-7 mol/L tRA, these values for the atypical S-form case lacking PML exon 4 in RAR 1-PML mRNA were 78.5% NBT-positive and 85% CD11b-positive.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2.
Correlative Analysis of RAR -PML mRNA Expression and Two Tests of In Vitro Differentiation in Response to 10-7 mol/L tRA
|
|
Studies for possible correlation with clinical characteristics and response to therapy.
Of the 98 total APL patients analyzed, 72 were entered on protocol E2491 and were analyzed for RAR 1-PML and RAR 2-PML mRNA expression. The distribution of the three possible combinations of RAR 1/ 2-PML mRNA expression for this subset were virtually identical to those for the entire group (compare Tables 1 and 3). As shown in Table 3, there were no significant differences (P .1) in the presenting clinical characteristics of patients when analyzed for a difference in: (1) any one of the three possible RAR 1-PML/RAR 2-PML combinations compared with the other two; (2) RAR 1-PML mRNA expressors versus nonexpressors; and (3) RAR 2-PML mRNA expressors versus nonexpressors. A similar analysis of on-study hematologic characteristics (Table 4) indicted a trend toward a higher proportion of RAR 1-PML mRNA nonexpressors than expressors with a presenting WBC count greater than 5,000 cells/uL (50% v 21%; P = .054).
No indication of any difference was found in the complete remission (CR) rate related to RAR 1/2-PML mRNA expression with the rates of all three combinations tightly clustered around the mean of 77% (Table 5). Similarly, there was no indication of any difference in DFS in RAR 1-PML expressors versus nonexpressors (Fig 4A) or RAR 2-PML expressors versus nonexpressors (Fig 4B).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 4.
Kaplan-Meier curves of disease-free survival in RAR 1-PML mRNA (A) or RAR 2-PML mRNA (B) expressors versus nonexpressors. The legend denominators indicate the number of protocol cases at risk in successive 6-month intervals up to 2.5 years of followup beginning from the time of the clinical diagnosis of complete remission. The legend numerators indicate the number of cases at risk that experienced adverse events leading to an off-protocol status (relapse or death).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
This report documents that both RAR 1 and RAR 2 mRNAs are universally expressed from the nontranslocated allele in fresh APL cells. RAR 2 mRNA is expressed at a lower level than RAR 1 mRNA in all cases. Further studies are required to evaluate possible selective quantitative changes in the expression level of RAR 2 mRNA in APL cells following tRA exposure. In murine cells, RAR 1 and RAR 2 can be independently regulated by tRA related to a retinoic acid response element (RARE) in the promoter region of RAR 2 but not RAR 1.11 On the translocated allele in APL cells, the RAR 2 coding exon 3, like RAR 1 coding exons 1 and 2, could be expressed as a fusion product with downstream PML exons as RAR 2-PML mRNA. The incidence of RAR 2-PML mRNA expression, however, was much lower than RAR 1-PML mRNA with 27.6% versus 76.5% of APL cases positive, respectively. This lower incidence of RAR 2-PML mRNA is not unexpected, because a complex recombinational event would be required to form RAR 2-PML mRNA in cases with gene breaks between RAR exons 2 and 3. Because RAR exon 3 is situated approximately two-thirds of the distance between exon 2 and exon 4 that encodes the B-region in humans,5,15 the observed frequency of RAR 2-PML mRNA expression is approximately that predicted (ie, 76.5 × 0.33 = 25.2%), if the breaksites between RAR exons 2 and 4 are equally distributed, and if no other element differentially affects the probability of forming stable RAR 2-PML mRNA versus RAR 1-PML mRNA. Reported mapping data of RAR "intron 2" breaksites, in fact, indicate a fairly even distribution.5,9 These considerations, as well as our observation that RAR 2-PML mRNA is not expressed in the absence of RAR 1-PML mRNA, suggest that the expression of these two gene products are not independently regulated in APL cells. Our finding that RAR 1-PML mRNA is expressed in the absence of RAR 2-PML mRNA in NB4 cells in which the RAR breaksite has been determined to lie between exons 3 and 4 without deletion9 indicates, however, that sequential regulation is not universally obligate. More generally, it is not understood why 25% of APL cases do not express RAR 1-PML mRNA, although the lack of deletion suggests involvement of a transcriptional or posttranscriptional regulatory mechanism. Our calculation that the reduced incidence of RAR 2-PML mRNA expression is proportionate to that for RAR 1-PML mRNA also suggests involvement of a common mechanism not operative on the normal RAR allele.
In addition to confirming the previously reported incidence of RAR 1-PML mRNA expression in leukemic cells from 67% to 80% of APL cases,6,7 this report establishes that its incidence is equal among all three PML-RAR fusion gene types. Although RAR 2-PML mRNA expression appeared to be expressed at a somewhat lower frequency in S-form cases (7/37; 19%) compared with L-form and V-form cases (20/57; 33%), this difference was not statistically significant (P = .17; Fisher's exact test). Further, in a recent genomic mapping study, PML intron 3 breaksites, ie, S-form cases, were not selectively associated with RAR exon 3 to 4 breaksites (7/25 cases; 28%) compared with RAR exon 2 to 3 breaksites (9/36 cases; 25%).9 Thus, we conclude that there is no measurable association between RAR 2-PML mRNA expression and PML-RAR type.
Most importantly, this study found no evidence for a biologically significant role of RAR 1-PML mRNA or RAR 2-PML mRNA expression in APL cells. At a molecular level, we found that RAR 2-PML mRNA encodes a truncated RAR 2 peptide restricted to the A2-region because of a translational reading frame shift at the RAR 2-PML junction in all RAR 2-PML-positive L- and V-form PML-RAR cases. It seems improbable that such a short peptide, even if stably produced, could have a positive functional role, although it conceivably could have a negative action by somehow interfering with its normal counterpart. Studies at the cellular level were against the latter possibility. APL cells from RAR 2-PML-positive L-form cases had high-level sensitivity to tRA-induced differentiation in vitro, and, similarly, APL cells from a variant S-form PML-RAR case (Sv) that expressed only a truncated RAR 1 peptide restricted to the A1-region were fully sensitive to tRA-induced differentiation in vitro. More generally, we found no correlation between the expression of either RAR 1-PML or RAR 2-PML mRNAs and sensitivity to tRA-induced differentiation of APL cells in vitro. At the clinical level in protocol E2491 patients, we also found no differences related to RAR 1/ 2-PML mRNA expression in the CR rate after randomization to either tRA or standard chemotherapy induction treatment or in the distribution of overall DFS with a median follow-up of 16 months.13 In the patient subgroup that lacked expression of either RAR 1-PML or RAR 2-PML mRNA, we found a trend toward a higher presenting WBC count (P = .054), a characteristic consistently associated with a poor long-term prognosis in APL.13,19,20 This weak association and limitations of statistical power related to sample size are our only reservations to the conclusion that the current study provides no indication of a clinically relevant role of the RAR 1-PML or RAR 2-PML fusion gene products in APL. This conclusion is analogous to that reached in a recent study of chronic myelogenous leukemia in which it was reported that the presence or absence of expression of the reciprocal product of the BCR-ABL hybrid gene associated with the t(9; 22), ie, ABL-BCR mRNA, was not correlated with clinical response to interferon- therapy.21
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Submitted August 9, 1996;
accepted February 20, 1997.
Supported by Public Health Service Grants No. CA56771, CA21115, CA23318, CA14985, and P30CA13330 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health and the Department of Health and Human Services, the Chemotherapy Foundation, and the Leukaemia Research Fund of Great Britain.
This study was conducted in the majority by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (Robert L. Comis, MD, Group Chair).
The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute.
Address reprint requests to Robert E. Gallagher, MD, Department of Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
charge payment. This article must therefore be hearly marked
``advertisment'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734 solely to
indicate this fact.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
The authors thank the physicians, nursing staffs, and data managers of the Albert Einstein Cancer Center and other ECOG affiliated institutions for their cooperation in obtaining and sending the clinical specimens used for performing these studies. We also thank Johanna Epstein for technical assistance and for performing the densitometric readings of ethidium bromide-stained PCR products after gel electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
de The H,
Lavau C,
Marchio A,
Chomienne C,
Degos L,
Dejean A:
The PML-RAR fusion mRNA generated by the t(15; 17) translocation in acute promyelocytic leukemia encodes a functionally altered RAR.
Cell
66:675,
1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Kakizuka A,
Miller WH Jr,
Umesono K,
Warrell RP Jr,
Frankel SR,
Murty VVVS,
Dmitrovsky E,
Evans RM:
Chromosomal translocation t(15; 17) in human acute promyelocytic leukemia fuses RAR with a novel putative transcription factor, PML.
Cell
66:663,
1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Kastner P,
Perez A,
Lutz Y,
Rochette-Egly C,
Gaub M-P,
Durand B,
Lanotte M,
Berger R,
Chambon P:
Structure, localization and transcriptional properties of two classes of retinoic acid receptor fusion proteins in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL): Structural similarities with a new family of oncoproteins.
EMBO J
11:629,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Pandolfi PP,
Alcalay M,
Fagioli M,
Zangrilli D,
Mencarelli A,
Diverio D,
Biondi A,
Lo Coco F,
Rambaldi A,
Grignani F,
Rochette-Egly C,
Gaub M-P,
Chambon P,
Pelicci PG:
Genomic variability and alternative splicing generate multiple PML/RAR transcripts that encode aberrant PML proteins and PML/RAR isoforms in acute promyelocytic leukaemia.
EMBO J
11:1397,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Chen S-J,
Chen Z,
Chen A,
Tong J-H,
Dong S,
Wang Z-Y,
Waxman S,
Zelent A:
Occurrence of distinct PML-RAR fusion gene isoforms in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia detected by reverse transcriptase/polymerase chain reaction.
Oncogene
7:1223,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Alcalay M,
Zangrilli D,
Fagioli M,
Pandolfi P,
Mencarelli A,
Lo Coco F,
Biondi A,
Grignani F,
Pelicci P:
Expression pattern of the RAR -PML fusion gene in acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
89:4840,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7.
Borrow J,
Goddard AD,
Gibbons B,
Katz F,
Swirsky D,
Fioretos T,
Dube I,
Winfield DA,
Kingston J,
Hagemeijer A,
Rees JKH,
Lister TA,
Solomon E:
Diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukaemia by RT-PCR detection of PML-RARA and RARA-PML fusion transcripts.
Br J Haematol
82:529,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Fagioli M,
Alcalay M,
Pandolfi P,
Venturini L,
Mencarelli A,
Simeone A,
Acampora D,
Grignani F,
Pelicci P:
Alternative splicing of PML transcripts predicts coexpression of several carboxy-terminally different protein isoforms.
Oncogene
7:1083,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Yoshida H,
Naoe T,
Fukutani F,
Kiyoi H,
Kubo K,
Ohno R:
Analysis of the joining sequences of the t(15; 17) translocation human acute promyelocytic leukemia: Sequence non-specific recombination between the PML and RARA genes within identical short sequences.
Genes Chromosom Cancer
12:37,
1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Lafage-Pochitaloff M,
Alcalay M,
Brunel V,
Longo L,
Sainty D,
Simonetti J,
Birg F,
Pellici P:
Acute promyelocytic leukemia cases with nonreciprocal PML/RAR or RAR /PML fusion genes.
Blood
85:1169,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11.
Leroy P,
Krust A,
Zelent A,
Mendelsohn C,
Garnier J-M,
Kastner P,
Dierich A,
Chambon P:
Multiple isoforms of the mouse retinoic acid receptor are generated by alternative splicing and differential induction by retinoic acid.
EMBO J
10:59,
1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Gallagher RE,
Li Y-P,
Rao S,
Paietta E,
Andersen J,
Etkind P,
Tallman MS,
Wiernik PH:
Characterization of acute promyelocytic leukemia cases with PML-RAR break/fusion sites in PML exon 6: Identification of a subgroup with decreased in vitro responsiveness to all-trans retinoic acid.
Blood
86:1540,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Tallman MS, Andersen J, Schiffer CA, Appelbaum FR, Feusner JE, Woods WG, Ogden A, Weinstein H, Shepherd L, Rowe JM, Wiernik PH: Phase III randomized study of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) versus daunorubicin (D) as induction therapy and ATRA versus observation as maintenance therapy for patients with previously untreated acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 86:125a, 1995 (abstr, suppl 1)
14.
Li Y-P,
Said F,
Gallagher R:
Retinoic acid-resistant HL-60 cells exclusively contain mutant retinoic acid receptor-alpha.
Blood
83:3298,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15.
Paietta E,
Andersen J,
Gallagher R,
Bennett J,
Yunis J,
Cassileth P,
Rowe J,
Wiernik P:
The immunophenotype of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL): An ECOG study.
Leukemia
8:1108,
1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Mehta CR,
Patel NR,
Tsiatis AA:
Exact significance testing to establish treatment equivalence with ordered categorical data.
Biometrics
40:819,
1984[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Mantel N:
Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.
Cancer Chemother Rep
50:163,
1966[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Kaplan EL,
Meier P:
Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations.
J Am Stat Assoc
53:457,
1958
19.
Cunningham I,
Gee TS,
Reich LM,
Kempin SJ,
Naval AN,
Clarkson BD:
Acute promyelocytic leukemia: Treatment results during a decade at Memorial Hospital.
Blood
73:1116,
1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20.
Head D,
Kopecky KJ,
Weick J,
Files JC,
Ryan D,
Foucar K,
Montiel M,
Bickers J,
Fishleder A,
Miller M,
Spier C,
Hanson C,
Bitter M,
Braziel R,
Mills G,
Welborn J,
Williams W,
Hewlett J,
Willman C,
Appelbaum F:
Effect of aggressive daunomycin therapy on survival in acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Blood
86:1717,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21.
Melo J,
Hochhaus A,
Yan X-H,
Goldman J:
Lack of correlation between ABL-BCR expression and response to interferon- in chronic myelogenous leukaemia.
Br J Haematol
92:684,
1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Walter, R. E. Ries, J. R. Armstrong, J. S. Park, E. R. Mardis, and T. J. Ley
Expression of a bcr-1 isoform of RAR{alpha}-PML does not affect the penetrance of acute promyelocytic leukemia or the acquisition of an interstitial deletion on mouse chromosome 2
Blood,
February 1, 2007;
109(3):
1237 - 1240.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Jing, N. Hellinger, L. Xia, A. Monks, E. A. Sausville, A. Zelent, and S. Waxman
Benzodithiophenes Induce Differentiation and Apoptosis in Human Leukemia Cells
Cancer Res.,
September 1, 2005;
65(17):
7847 - 7855.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X.-f. Wang, D. Z. Qian, M. Ren, Y. Kato, Y. Wei, L. Zhang, Z. Fansler, D. Clark, O. Nakanishi, and R. Pili
Epigenetic Modulation of Retinoic Acid Receptor {beta}2 by the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor MS-275 in Human Renal Cell Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res.,
May 1, 2005;
11(9):
3535 - 3542.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. F. Farias, A. Arapshian, I. J. Bleiweiss, S. Waxman, A. Zelent, and R. Mira-y-Lopez
Retinoic Acid Receptor {alpha}2 Is a Growth Suppressor Epigenetically Silenced In MCF-7 Human Breast Cancer Cells
Cell Growth Differ.,
August 1, 2002;
13(8):
335 - 341.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. B. Zimonjic, J. L. Pollock, P. Westervelt, N. C. Popescu, and T. J. Ley
Acquired, nonrandom chromosomal abnormalities associated with the development of acute promyelocytic leukemia in transgenic mice
PNAS,
November 21, 2000;
97(24):
13306 - 13311.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Pollock, P. Westervelt, A. K. Kurichety, P. G. Pelicci, J. L. Grisolano, and T. J. Ley
A bcr-3 isoform of RARalpha -PML potentiates the development of PML-RARalpha -driven acute promyelocytic leukemia
PNAS,
December 21, 1999;
96(26):
15103 - 15108.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Melnick and J. D. Licht
Deconstructing a Disease: RAR{alpha}, Its Fusion Partners, and Their Roles in the Pathogenesis of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia
Blood,
May 15, 1999;
93(10):
3167 - 3215.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. K. Murray, E. Estey, E. Paietta, R. S. Howard, W. J. Edenfield, S. Pierce, K. P. Mann, C. Bolan, and J. C. Byrd
CD56 Expression in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: A Possible Indicator of Poor Treatment Outcome?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 1, 1999;
17(1):
293 - 293.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Ding, Y.-P. Li, L. M. Nobile, G. Grills, I. Carrera, E. Paietta, M. S. Tallman, P. H. Wiernik, and R. E. Gallagher
Leukemic Cellular Retinoic Acid Resistance and Missense Mutations in the PML-RARalpha Fusion Gene After Relapse of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia From Treatment With All-trans Retinoic Acid and Intensive Chemotherapy
Blood,
August 15, 1998;
92(4):
1172 - 1183.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|