|
|
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Blood, Vol. 90 No. 12 (December 15), 1997:
pp. 4876-4885
Characterization of Cryptic Rearrangements and Variant Translocations in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia
By
David Grimwade,
Patricia Gorman,
Estelle Duprez,
Kathy Howe,
Stephen Langabeer,
Fiona Oliver,
Helen Walker,
Dominic Culligan,
Jonathan Waters,
Mark Pomfret,
Anthony Goldstone,
Alan Burnett,
Paul Freemont,
Denise Sheer, and
Ellen Solomon
From the Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Division of Medical & Molecular Genetics, UMDS, London, UK; the Human Cytogenetics and Protein Structure Laboratories, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London, UK; the Department of Haematology, UCL Hospitals, London, UK; the Department of Haematology, Aberdeen Royal Hospitals NHS trust, Aberdeen, UK; and the Department of Haematology, University of Wales, Cardiff, UK; and the Regional Genetic Services, Cytogenetics Laboratory, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
 |
ABSTRACT |
Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is typified by the reciprocal translocation, t(15; 17)(q22; q21), leading to the formation of PML-RAR and RAR -PML fusion genes. We have characterized 7 cases of morphologic APL found to lack the t(15; 17) on conventional cytogenetic assessment. In 6 of 7 cases, cryptic PML-RAR rearrangements were identified by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH); whereas, in the remaining patient, APL was associated with the variant translocation, t(11; 17)(q23; q12-21), leading to the formation of PLZF-RAR and RAR -PLZF fusion genes. In each of the cases with cryptic PML-RAR rearrangements, PML-RAR transcripts were detected in the absence of RAR -PML, consistent with the concept that PML-RAR is the critical oncogenic fusion protein. In 4 of these cases with evaluable metaphase spreads, the occurrence of a nonreciprocal translocation was confirmed by FISH with sole formation of the PML-RAR fusion gene; in 3 cases with morphologically normal chromosomes 15 and 17, RAR was inserted into PML on 15q, whereas in the remaining patient the PML-RAR fusion arose due to insertion of 15q-derived material including PML into RAR on 17q. Immunofluorescence studies were performed using antibodies raised against PML and PIC 1, a ubiquitin-homology domain protein previously identified as an interaction partner of PML. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) of subtypes other than M3, PIC 1 was localized to the nuclear membrane and colocalized with PML within discrete nuclear bodies. In APL cases with cryptic PML-RAR rearrangements, the characteristic microparticulate pattern of PML staining was detected with partial colocalization with PIC 1, indicative of disruption of the nuclear bodies; whereas in t(11; 17)-associated APL, PML and PIC 1 remained colocalized within discrete nuclear bodies, as observed in non-APL cases. Although deregulation of the putative growth suppressor PML and delocalization of other nuclear body constituents have been advocated to play a key role in the development of t(15; 17)-associated APL, the present study shows that disruption of PML nuclear bodies per se is not a prerequisite for the pathogenesis of APL.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
ACUTE PROMYELOCYTIC leukemia (APL) is typified by the reciprocal translocation, t(15; 17)(q22; q21),1 leading to the formation of PML-RAR and RAR -PML fusion genes (reviewed by Grimwade and Solomon2 and references therein). PML-RAR , transcribed from add(15q), retains virtually all the domains considered to be of functional importance to both PML and RAR and has therefore traditionally been considered to play a key role in leukemogenesis, which has recently been confirmed using a transgenic model.3,4 Any role for del(17q)-derived RAR -PML in the development of APL remains unclear, particularly because reciprocal transcripts are detected in only 81% of patients5; nevertheless, a case of APL apparently lacking a PML-RAR fusion gene and in which only RAR -PML transcripts could be detected has recently been reported.6 The molecular pathogenesis of APL is believed to reflect two key processes: leukemic transformation coupled with a block in myeloid differentiation such that the marrow becomes replaced by abnormal promyelocytes.7 In APL cases associated with a PML-RAR rearrangement, this differentiation block may be overcome by retinoids such as all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA).8 To understand these phenomena, much effort has been devoted to the study of the physiologic roles of RAR and PML.
RAR is a member of the steroid hormone nuclear receptor family, serving as a transcription factor mediating the effect of retinoic acid at specific response elements (reviewed by Stunnenberg9 ). In common with vitamin D and thyroid hormone receptors, high-affinity DNA binding of retinoic acid receptors (RARs) requires heterodimerization with a member of the retinoid X receptor family.10,11 Integrity of these retinoid signaling pathways is critical for normal embryogenesis (reviewed by Grimwade and Solomon2 and references therein) and postnatal myeloid differentiation.12,13
In contrast to RAR , the role of PML remains less clearly defined. Initial claims that it also serves as a transcription factor on the basis of N-terminal zinc-binding RING finger and B-box domains14,15 remain unsubstantiated, and indeed more recent work has failed to demonstrate specific DNA-binding for the majority of RING-family members (reviewed by Saurin et al16 ). With the development of appropriate antisera, PML has been found to be predominantly localized to the nucleus within structures known as PML nuclear bodies.17-20 These are composed of several proteins of unknown function, including NDP52,21 Sp100, and Sp140, which were identified as targets for autoantibodies in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis,22,23 and PIC 1, a ubiquitin-homology domain protein, which has been found to interact directly with PML.24 A variety of experimental approaches have implicated PML in immunologic responses (Grimwade and Solomon2 and references therein) and there is some evidence to suggest that PML itself or components of the nuclear bodies are cell-cycle regulated and can mediate growth-suppressor activity.25-28 Cells from a wide range of tissues and blasts from leukemic subtypes other than APL typically demonstrate 10 to 30 discrete nuclear bodies when stained with PML antisera. Whereas, in APL cases associated with the t(15; 17), a microparticulate pattern of PML staining is characteristic,17-19 reflecting disruption of nuclear bodies due to an interaction between PML and PML-RAR .29 This process may promote leukemogenesis by delocalizing the putative growth-suppressor PML and other nuclear body components; this, coupled with an abnormal pattern of retinoid responses also mediated by the fusion protein, compounded by RXR sequestration could account for the block in myeloid differentiation that characterizes the disease. Treatment of such cases with ATRA leads to complete remission by terminal differentiation of the leukemic clone associated with release of inhibitory effects of PML-RAR at retinoid response elements14,30-32 and degradation of the fusion protein33,34 accompanied by normalization of nuclear body architecture.17-20 Rare cases of PML-RAR -mediated APL have been identified that fail to respond to retinoids associated with persistence of the microparticulate PML nuclear staining pattern.19,35 On the basis of these findings it has been suggested that disruption of PML nuclear bodies is critical to the pathogenesis of APL; furthermore, it has been advocated that reconstitution of normal nuclear architecture is essential to permit differentiation in the presence of retinoids.19
Although ATRA therapy is unable to sustain long-term remission in APL,36-38 recent studies have shown that a combined treatment approach using ATRA and chemotherapy confers significant improvements in disease-free survival compared with chemotherapy alone.39,40 Because a favorable response to ATRA appears to be restricted to patients with the t(15; 17),8,41 establishing the presence of this cytogenetic change, or in its absence identification of a PML-RAR rearrangement, is fundamental for optimal treatment of patients and meaningful analysis of APL trials. Although early studies in specialized centers reported the presence of the t(15; 17) in all cases of APL42; it is now clear that some cases with morphologic acute myeloid leukemia (AML) M3 reflect cryptic PML-RAR rearrangements,6,43,44 whereas in others RAR is fused to a partner other than PML. Thus far, three such alternative fusion partners have been identified, including the novel Krüppel-like zinc finger protein PLZF involved in the t(11; 17)(q23; q21)45; nucleophosmin, an RNA processing protein disrupted by the t(5; 17)(q32; q12)46; and most recently NuMA, which is involved in control of mitosis and is rearranged by the t(11; 17)(q13; q21).47 Although such variant translocations are extremely rare, accounting for less than 1% of morphologic APL,48 elucidation of the mechanisms underlying leukemogenesis in these cases is likely to provide considerable insight into the processes involved in the development of PML-RAR -mediated disease and in particular as to whether disruption of PML nuclear bodies is fundamental to the pathogenesis of APL. Cases with variant fusion translocations also afford the opportunity to dissect out mechanisms leading to leukemic transformation from those mediating the block in myeloid differentiation and its reversal by retinoids. In the present study, we have characterized 7 cases of morphologic APL found to lack the t(15; 17) on conventional cytogenetic assessment and considered their implications for the pathogenesis of APL as a whole.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Patients and cytogenetics.
This study considers 7 patients with morphologic APL who were found to lack the t(15; 17) on conventional cytogenetic assessment. Five patients were drawn from the MRC ATRA trial; details of the treatment protocol have been described elsewhere.5 Cytogenetic assessment was undertaken at local centers or by the central UK MRC AML trials cytogenetics service at University College Hospital, London, according to standard methods.49 In each case in which APL was associated with a normal karyotype, preparations were subject to at least 24 hours of culture and a minimum of 20 metaphases were examined.
Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and sequence analysis.
Details of bone marrow and peripheral blood sample preparation, RNA extraction, and RT-PCR protocols to detect PML-RAR and RAR 1-PML fusion transcripts in conjunction with RAR and PML as controls for RNA integrity have been fully described elsewhere.5,50 Using cDNA generated by the same method, PLZF-RAR and RAR -PLZF transcripts were amplified using nested PCR in material derived from a patient with t(11; 17)(q23; q12-21) identified by cytogenetics. Primers used for PLZF-RAR PCR were as follows: PLZF external, 5'-TCCAGAGGGAGCTGTTCAGC-3'; RAR external, 5'-TCTTCTGGATGCTGCGGCGG-3'; PLZF internal, 5'-TCGAGCTTCCTGATAACGAG-3'; and RAR internal, 5'-GGCGCTGACCCCATAGTGGT-3'. Primers for RAR 1-PLZF nested PCR comprised the following: RAR external, 5'-GGCCAGCAACAGCAGCTCCT-3'; PLZF external, 5'-ATGTCAGTGCCAGTATGGGT-3'; RAR internal, 5'-GGTGCCTCCCTACGCCTTCT-3'; and PLZF internal, 5'-CACTGATCACAGACAAAGGC-3'.
PCR was performed in a 50 µL reaction, with 1 µL of the first round PCR products used as template for the second round of PCR, as previously described.51 First and second round PCR reactions comprised 35 cycles, each consisting of 1 minute of denaturation at 95°C, 1 minute of annealing at 57°C, and 1 minute of extension at 72°C, followed by 10 minutes of extension at 72°C (OmniGene apparatus; Hybaid, Teddington, Middlesex, UK). PCR products were size-separated on ethidium bromide-stained 1.5% agarose gels, as previously described.50 Bcr 1 (intron 6) and bcr 2 (exon 6) PML breakpoints were distinguished by sequence analysis of PML-RAR PCR products using previously described methods and primers.5 PLZF-RAR and RAR -PLZF PCR products were similarly sequenced, using appropriate internal primers, with an automated sequencer (377; ABI, Perkin-Elmer, CA).
Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).
FISH using ICRF PML and RAR cosmid probes (15.5 and 121, respectively) was performed to detect PML-RAR fusion genes in patients lacking the t(15; 17), using previously described methods.43 PML cosmid 15.5 encompasses the 5' region of the gene, including exons 1 and 2, whereas RAR cosmid 121 spans the APL breakpoint region on chromosome 17.43 In APL cases associated with the t(15; 17), a dual signal is detected with these probes on the derivative chromosome 15, identifying the site of the PML-RAR fusion, in addition to single hybridization signals corresponding to the normal PML and RAR loci on 15q and 17q, respectively. FISH was also performed, using PML and RAR probes (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD), which detect the formation of the reciprocal RAR -PML fusion gene on del(17q) in APL cases associated with the t(15; 17), in addition to single signals relating to the normal PML and RAR loci. To further characterize cases with cryptic PML-RAR fusion genes, whole chromosome paints (WCPs; Vysis, Richmond, Surrey, UK) and biotinylated centromere probes (Oncor) for chromosomes 15 and 17 were used, in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Images were captured with a Zeiss Axioskop epifluorescence microscope and cooled CCD camera (Photometrics, AZ), controlled by an Apple Macintosh computer (Apple Computer Inc, Cupertino, CA). Image capture and processing software were obtained from Vysis, UK.
Immunofluorescence.
The PML immunofluorescence technique as applied to crude bone marrow or peripheral blood smears using polyclonal PML antisera has been described in detail previously.5 Dual immunofluorescence studies were also undertaken using a polyclonal antiserum raised against the PML nuclear body constituent, PIC 1,24 and a monoclonal antibody (PG-M3; kindly provided by P.G. Pelicci, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy) directed against the amino-terminal of PML, which recognizes both wild-type PML and the PML-RAR fusion protein.52 Bone marrow/peripheral blood smears were fixed in methanol at -20°C for 15 minutes, allowed to air dry, and preblocked with 10% fetal calf serum. Slides were then incubated simultaneously with PG-M3 and PIC 1 antibodies at a dilution of 1/5 and 1/200, respectively, in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-Tween 0.5% for 1 hour at room temperature. Slides were subsequently incubated with Texas-Red-coupled antimouse (Dako Ltd, High Wycombe, UK) and fluorescein-coupled antirabbit (Amersham Intl, Amersham, UK) secondary antibodies, each at 1/200 dilution, for 30 minutes at room temperature. All incubations were followed by three washes in PBS followed by a final wash comprising 0.05% Tween in PBS for 10 minutes. Preparations were examined by confocal laser scanning as previously described.5,24
 |
RESULTS |
Cytogenetic and molecular characterization of APL cases lacking the t(15; 17).
Cytogenetic and molecular findings in 7 patients with morphologic features of APL, but lacking the t(15; 17), are presented in Table 1. In 6 of 7 patients, RT-PCR confirmed the presence of a PML-RAR rearrangement, and in each of these cases PML-RAR transcripts were detected in the absence of RAR -PML. In the remaining patient (case no. 7), APL was associated with t(11; 17) (q23; q12-21); RT-PCR confirmed expression of both PLZF-RAR and reciprocal RAR -PLZF transcripts (Fig 1). Sequencing of PLZF-RAR and RAR -PLZF PCR products was consistent with breakpoints within the second intron of RAR and within the intron separating the exons coding for the second and third zinc fingers of PLZF, as identified in 5 of 6 previously described cases.41,53

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 1.
Detection of PLZF-RAR and RAR -PLZF transcripts by nested RT-PCR in t(11; 17)(q23; q12-21)-associated APL. PLZF-RAR and RAR -PLZF cDNA sequences are shown on the right; the positions of RAR and PLZF fusion junctions are delineated by vertical arrows.
|
|
FISH analysis of APL cases with cryptic PML-RAR rearrangements.
FISH using ICRF probes, PML cos 15.5 and RAR cos 121, confirmed formation of a PML-RAR fusion in each of the 6 APL cases in which PML-RAR rearrangements were identified by RT-PCR (Table 1). In 4 patients with available diagnostic metaphase spreads, the mechanism underlying the PML-RAR rearrangement was further characterized, using ICRF cosmid probes that specifically detect the PML-RAR fusion gene, in conjunction with centromere probes and WCPs for chromosomes 15 and 17. In 3 patients, in each of whom morphologically normal chromosomes 15 and 17 were identified by conventional cytogenetics (cases no. 1 through 3, Table 1), the PML-RAR fusion gene was localized to chromosome 15q (Fig 2a and b). In each case, 15 and 17 specific paints hybridized solely to their respective chromosomes (Fig 2c and d), consistent with an interstitial insertion of RAR into PML on 15q. Furthermore, in each of these cases, using commercially available probes (Oncor), RAR was found to hybridize to two normal appearing chromosome 17s in addition to forming a fusion signal on 15q, again consistent with formation of a PML-RAR fusion on 15q and absence of the reciprocal RAR -PML fusion gene as suggested by RT-PCR analyses. In the remaining patient with evaluable metaphases, PML 15.5 and RAR 121 probes localized the PML-RAR fusion to 17q (case no. 4; Fig 3a and b). In addition to the PML-RAR fusion signal, a more centromeric RAR hybridization signal was observed. WCPs demonstrated insertion of chromosome 15 material into 17q, such that chromosome 17 appeared abnormally large on conventional cytogenetic assessment (Fig 3c and d). These results indicate that the PML-RAR fusion in this patient reflected insertion of PML with more centromeric chromosome 15-derived material into the genomic region spanned by RAR cos 121; again, this was consistent with detection of PML-RAR in the absence of RAR -PML fusion transcripts by RT-PCR.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 2.
Cryptic PML-RAR fusion resulting from interstitial insertion of RAR into PML on 15q (case no. 2; Table 1). (a) FISH analysis using ICRF PML 15.5 (green) and RAR 121 (red) cosmid probes. The RAR probe hybridized to two chromosome 17s of normal appearance, whereas 1 normal PML locus was observed on chromosome 15. The PML-RAR fusion was detected on 15q (yellow arrow). Localization of the fusion gene was confirmed by subsequent hybridization with a chromosome 15 centromere probe, shown in red in (b). (c) Chromosome 15 paint (red); chromosome 17 centromere probe (green). (d) Chromosome 17 paint (green); chromosome 15 centromere probe (red)
|
|

View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 3.
PML-RAR fusion resulting from interstitial insertion of PML with associated chromosome 15-derived material into RAR on 17q (case no. 4; Table 1). (a) FISH analysis using ICRF PML (green) and RAR (red) cosmid probes. PML-RAR fusion gene was detected on 17q (yellow arrow), adjacent to RAR hybridization signal (red arrow). Splitting of the RAR - derived signal on der(17q) was indicative of insertion of PML and adjacent sequence into the genomic region covered by RAR cosmid 121. Localization of the PML-RAR fusion gene was confirmed by subsequent hybridization with a chromosome 17 centromere probe shown in green in (b). (c) Chromosome 15 paint (red) and chromosome 17 centromere probe (green), confirming insertion of chromosome 15-derived material into 17q. (d) Chromosome 17 paint (green), chromosome 15 centromere probe (red). Chromosome 17 paint remained localized to 17; der(17q) showed a region of absent signal corresponding to the inserted region of 15q shown in (c).
|
|
Nuclear architecture in APL cases lacking the t(15; 17).
Immunofluorescence studies were performed using polyclonal PML antisera. In 3 patients, cryptic PML-RAR rearrangements detected by FISH and RT-PCR were confirmed by the presence of the characteristic microparticulate nuclear staining pattern in leukemic cells (Table 1 and Fig 4a), identical to that observed in the NB4 cell-line and APL cases associated with the t(15; 17)5; whereas, in the APL case associated with the t(11; 17) leading to a PLZF-RAR rearrangement, a wild-type pattern of PML nuclear staining was observed within the leukemic blasts (Fig 4c), identical to that seen in 2 non-APL AML patients (Fig 4b) and to that previously described for HL60 and U937 cell-lines.5

View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 4.
PML immunofluorescence in AML using polyclonal antisera. Phase contrast is shown in left-hand panels and corresponding PML immunofluorescence on the right. In APL cases with cryptic PML-RAR rearrangements, a microparticulate pattern of PML nuclear staining was observed as shown in (a). In non-APL cases, a wild-type pattern of PML nuclear staining was detected, as shown in AML M2 blasts in (b); similar nuclear staining was observed in t(11; 17)-associated APL (case no. 7; Table 1), shown in (c).
|
|
Dual immunofluorescence studies were subsequently undertaken using a PML monoclonal antibody and polyclonal antiserum directed against PIC 1, a newly described constituent of PML nuclear bodies. In 3 non-APL AML cases, PML and PIC 1 were colocalized within discrete nuclear bodies as shown in Fig 5b; as distinct from the pattern detected in a patient with a cryptic PML-RAR rearrangement (case no. 5) in which microparticulate PML staining was observed, with only partial colocalization with PIC 1 (Fig 5a). In the patient with t(11; 17)-associated APL, PML and PIC 1 were colocalized within discrete nuclear bodies (Fig 5c), as observed in non-APL cases. In addition to discrete punctate nuclear staining, PIC 1 was also localized to the nuclear membrane, as clearly shown in Fig 5b and c.

View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 5.
PML and PIC 1 localization in AML. Dual immunofluorescence using PML monoclonal (left-hand panel) and PIC 1 polyclonal (center panel) antibodies. Images are fused in the right-hand panel; yellow signal denotes regions of PML/PIC 1 colocalization. (a) In APL cases associated with cryptic PML-RAR rearrangements, a microparticulate pattern of PML nuclear staining was associated with partial colocalization with PIC 1. In non-APL cases, eg, AML M4, shown in (b) and in t(11; 17)-associated APL (case no. 7; Table 1), shown in (c), PIC 1 was localized to the nuclear membrane and colocalized with PML within discrete nuclear bodies.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Early studies in specialist cytogenetic centers reported that the t(15; 17) could be detected in all cases of APL.42 In the light of such claims, clinicians encountering AML cases with morphologic features of APL could lose faith in the initial clinical diagnosis if subsequent cytogenetic assessment failed to provide appropriate confirmatory evidence. However, since the characterization of the PML-RAR rearrangement that underlies the t(15; 17) and identification of the rare variant translocations whereby RAR is fused to partners other than PML, it is clear that absence of the t(15; 17) does not preclude a morphologic diagnosis of APL, although it remains the diagnostic hallmark of the disease. Large multicenter studies such as the UK MRC ATRA trial afford the opportunity to determine the frequency of cryptic rearrangements and variant translocations among patients with suspected APL. In this regard, in only 87% of APL patients with molecular evidence of a PML-RAR rearrangement was the t(15; 17) detectable by conventional cytogenetics. In most cases, absence of the t(15; 17) was a reflection of failed cytogenetics; however, 2% of cases were due to cryptic PML-RAR rearrangements.5
In the present study, we have characterized a series of 7 patients with morphologic APL found to lack the t(15; 17) on successful conventional cytogenetic assessment. In 6 patients, of whom 5 had morphologically normal chromosomes 15 and 17, the diagnosis was confirmed by the presence of a PML-RAR rearrangement; in each case, PML-RAR transcripts were detected by RT-PCR in the absence of the reciprocal derived RAR -PML species. FISH analyses in 4 such patients with evaluable metaphase spreads confirmed the presence of a nonreciprocal translocation and in each case were consistent with formation of PML-RAR as the sole fusion gene as a result of an interstitial insertion event, most commonly due to insertion of RAR into PML on 15q. This phenomenon was observed in 3 cases and has been the subject of two previous case reports in which chromosomes 15 and 17 also appeared normal by conventional cytogenetics.6,44 In the remaining patient with evaluable metaphases in the present study, the PML-RAR fusion was found to result from insertion of PML into RAR on 17q, which has not been previously described. Future characterization of the genomic breakpoints of these cases may provide insights not only into mechanisms mediating interstitial insertions but also into mechanisms underlying the more typical classical reciprocal translocation.
Demonstration of PML-RAR as the sole fusion gene formed in each of the APL cases with cryptic PML-RAR rearrangements in this study is consistent with the proposed role of its gene product as a critical mediator of leukemogenesis.2,43,51 This has recently been confirmed in a transgenic model3,4 whereby expression of PML-RAR was associated with impairment of normal myeloid differentiation accompanied by accumulation of primitive precursors and predisposition to the development of an APL-like syndrome responsive to ATRA. Although the presence of a latent period before developing the leukemia argues in favor of a requirement for additional mutational events, as has been suggested in theoretical models of tumorigenesis,54 it could also imply that high-level expression of the transgene did not occur within equivalent progenitors to those forming the targets of leukemic transformation in human APL. Although PML-RAR is clearly established as playing a key role in leukemogenesis and determining the differentiation response to ATRA, any role for RAR -PML in the pathogenesis of the disease remains to be determined. Although a single case of APL in which a RAR -PML fusion gene was apparently formed in isolation has been reported,6 the present study demonstrating a series of cases in which PML-RAR was the sole fusion gene formed argues against a significant role for RAR -PML in the pathogenesis of APL. Furthermore, this study, when considered in conjunction with previous series establishing that RAR -PML transcripts are not detectable in approximately 20% APL patients,5 shows that, at least in a proportion of cases, absence of RAR -PML transcripts reflects the occurrence of PML-RAR rearrangements due to interstitial insertion events rather than the classic reciprocal translocation.
In 1 patient in the present study, APL was associated with t(11; 17)(q23; q12-21), leading to a PLZF-RAR rearrangement. In common with the index case,53 both PLZF-RAR and RAR -PLZF transcripts could be detected by RT-PCR, consistent with the concept that, in contrast to t(15; 17)-mediated APL, both fusion partners are implicated in leukemogenesis.41,55 Whereas PLZF bears no structural similarities to PML, being characterized by an amino-terminal POZ motif, and 9 carboxy-terminal zinc finger domains implicated in its role as a transcription factor41,53,55-58; the two proteins and their respective fusion products share a number of common features. In particular, PLZF is localized to discrete nuclear bodies56,58 whose formation is dependent on the integrity of the POZ domain57 and exhibits growth-suppressor activity in transformation assays.48,59 Furthermore, in common with PML-RAR , PLZF-RAR may sequester RXR and binds retinoid response elements inhibiting transactivation.56,57,60 These processes involving disrupted growth-suppressor function coupled with deregulation of retinoid signaling pathways appear to provide a final common pathway for the pathogenesis of APL. However, in marked contrast to the disease associated with PML-RAR rearrangements, in vitro differentiation assays have shown that blasts derived from t(11; 17)(q23; q21) APL cases are resistant to retinoids.41 This may be accounted for by a number of factors, including differing repertoire and character of response between the respective fusion proteins in the presence of ligand,57,60,61 possibly compounded by the absence of ATRA-induced degradation of PLZF-RAR 34 and by upregulation of RAR -PLZF leading to persistent deregulation of the cell cycle.41,55,59
Recent studies suggest that there is at least partial colocalization of PML and PLZF within the nucleus,61,62 raising the possibilities that their growth-suppressor activities might be interrelated and that fusion proteins associated with variant APL translocations could promote leukemogenesis by disruption of PML nuclear bodies. Therefore, in the context of such a model, one might expect ATRA-resistant t(11; 17) cases to maintain a disrupted pattern of PML nuclear bodies, reminiscent of that reported in retinoid-resistant PML-RAR -mediated cases.19,35 However, the present study refutes such a hypothesis; disruption of PML nuclear bodies was only observed in APL cases associated with cryptic PML-RAR rearrangements in which PML nuclear staining patterns were identical to t(15; 17)-positive cases, whereas a wild-type pattern of PML nuclear staining was detected in blasts derived from t(11; 17)(q23; q21)-associated APL, reminiscent of that observed in other subtypes of AML. Furthermore, using dual immunofluorescence techniques, we were able to show that PIC 1 (GMP 1,63 SUMO 164), a novel-ubiquitin homology domain protein identified as an interaction partner of PML in a yeast-two hybrid screen,24 interacts with PML in vivo in AML blasts as well as in nonhemopoietic cell lines, as previously described.24 In t(11; 17)-associated APL and in non-APL cases, in addition to perfect colocalization with PML within discrete nuclear bodies, a perinuclear pattern of PIC 1 staining was observed consistent with its reported interaction with RanGap1, targeting it to the nuclear pore complex.63,64 In contrast, in APL cases associated with cryptic PML-RAR rearrangements, only partial colocalization of PML and PIC 1 was observed, confirming results previously obtained with the APL cell-line NB4,24 reflecting disruption of PML nuclear bodies in the presence of the PML-RAR fusion protein. Recent work has established that the second heptad repeat of the coiled-coil domain of PML-RAR is critical for nuclear body disruption, which does not appear to be necessary either for the block in differentiation or its reversal by retinoids; both of these effects are dependent on the integrity of the first heptad repeat of the coiled-coil region.29 Whether this perturbation of nuclear architecture is involved in the process of leukemic transformation is still undetermined. It remains a possibility that disruption of the nuclear bodies is merely a secondary phenomenon reflecting an interaction between the PML-RAR fusion protein and wild-type PML and is of no importance to leukemogenesis. Nevertheless, the present study underlines the fact that disruption of PML nuclear bodies provides a valuable marker for the PML-RAR fusion protein in cases lacking the t(15; 17) and confirms PML immunofluorescence as a suitable technique for rapid identification of the subgroup of APL patients likely to benefit from retinoids.5,65 In conclusion, although deregulation of the putative growth-suppressor PML and delocalization of other nuclear body constituents have been advocated to play a key role in the development of t(15; 17)-associated APL, the present study shows that disruption of PML nuclear bodies per se is not a prerequisite for the pathogenesis of APL.
 |
NOTE ADDED IN PROOF |
A wild-type PML nuclear localization pattern has also recently been reported in an APL case with the variant translocation t(11;17)(q13;q21) leading to a NUMA/RAR rearrangement.47 PIC 1 has been designated UBL 1 by the Gene Nomenclature Committee.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Submitted May 27, 1997;
accepted August 1, 1997.
D.G. was supported by an MRC clinical training fellowship. E.S. and K.H. were supported by EEC grants BIOMED-CT92-0755 and Biotech BI02-CT-930450. E.D. was supported by an EC TMR fellowship. D.G. and K.H. are currently supported by ICRF. S.L. and DNA/RNA banking facilities at University College Hospital, London are currently supported by the Kay Kendall Leukaemia Fund.
Address reprint requests to Dr David Grimwade, Cancer Genetics Laboratory, UMDS, 8th Floor, Guy's Tower, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
charge payment. This article must therefore be hearly marked
``advertisment'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734 solely to
indicate this fact.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
The authors are grateful to all the clinicians who entered patients into the MRC ATRA trial and forwarded material for molecular and cytogenetic analyses, particularly Dr Steve Kelsey. We thank Steve Chatters and Joanne Rogers in the Cytogenetics Laboratory at University College Hospital, London, and the cytogeneticists involved in karyotyping these patients who provided material for FISH analyses, particularly Debra Lillington, Michael Neat, and David Stevenson. We are grateful to Peter Jordan for assistance with immunofluorescence studies, to the photographic department at ICRF, Lincoln's Inn Fields, and to Iain Goldsmith and the oligonucleotide synthesis service at ICRF, Clare Hall. We also thank Hans Nicolai, Dr Melissa Brown, Dr Aurélie Catteau, and Dr Chun-Fang Xu for helpful discussions and assistance with sequence analyses.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Rowley JD,
Golomb HM,
Dougherty C:
15/17 translocation, a consistent chromosomal change in acute promyelocytic leukaemia.
Lancet
1:549,
1977[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Grimwade D,
Solomon E:
Characterisation of the PML/RAR rearrangement associated with t(15; 17) acute promyelocytic leukaemia.
Curr Topics Microbiol Immunol
220:81,
1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Brown D,
Kogan S,
Lagasse E,
Weissman I,
Alcalay M,
Pelicci PG,
Atwater S,
Bishop JM:
A PMLRAR transgene initiates murine acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:2551,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4.
Grisolano JL,
Wesselschmidt RL,
Pelicci PG,
Ley TJ:
Altered myeloid development and acute leukemia in transgenic mice expressing PML-RAR under control of cathepsin G regulatory sequences.
Blood
89:376,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5.
Grimwade D,
Howe K,
Langabeer S,
Davies L,
Oliver F,
Walker H,
Swirsky D,
Wheatley K,
Goldstone A,
Burnett A,
Solomon E:
Establishing the presence of the t(15; 17) in suspected acute promyelocytic leukaemia: Cytogenetic, molecular and PML immunofluorescence assessment of patients entered into the M.R.C. ATRA trial.
Br J Haematol
94:557,
1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Lafage-Pochitaloff M,
Alcalay M,
Brunel V,
Longo L,
Sainty D,
Simonetti J,
Birg F,
Pelicci PG:
Acute promyelocytic leukemia cases with nonreciprocal PML/RAR or RAR /PML fusion genes.
Blood
85:1169,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7.
Grignani F,
Ferrucci PF,
Testa U,
Talamo G,
Fagioli M,
Alcalay M,
Mencarelli A,
Peschle C,
Nicoletti I,
Pelicci PG:
The acute promyelocytic leukemia-specific PML-RAR fusion protein inhibits differentiation and promotes survival of myeloid precursor cells.
Cell
74:423,
1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Miller WH,
Kakizuka A,
Frankel SR,
Warrell RP,
DeBlasio A,
Levine K,
Evans R,
Dmitrovsky E:
Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for the rearranged retinoic acid receptor clarifies diagnosis and detects minimal residual disease in acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
89:2694,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9.
Stunnenberg HG:
Mechanisms of transactivation by retinoic acid receptors.
Bioessays
15:309,
1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Kliewer SA,
Umesono K,
Mangelsdorf DJ,
Evans RM:
Retinoid X receptor interacts with nuclear receptors in retinoic acid, thyroid hormone and vitamin D3 signalling.
Nature
355:446,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Zhang X-K,
Hoffmann B,
Tran PB-V,
Graupner G,
Pfahl M:
Retinoid X receptor is an auxiliary protein for thyroid hormone and retinoic acid receptors.
Nature
355:441,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Tsai S,
Collins SJ:
A dominant negative retinoic acid receptor blocks neutrophil differentiation at the promyelocyte stage.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
90:7153,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13.
Onodera M,
Kunisada T,
Nishikawa S,
Sakiyama Y,
Matsumoto S,
Nishikawa S-I:
Overexpression of retinoic acid receptor suppresses myeloid cell differentiation at the promyelocyte stage.
Oncogene
11:1291,
1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Kakizuka A,
Miller WH,
Umesono K,
Warrell RP,
Frankel SR,
Murty VVVS,
Dmitrovsky E,
Evans RM:
Chromosomal translocation t(15; 17) in human acute promyelocytic leukemia fuses RAR with a novel putative transcription factor, PML.
Cell
66:663,
1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Goddard AD,
Borrow J,
Freemont PS,
Solomon E:
Characterization of a zinc finger gene disrupted by the t(15; 17) in acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Science
254:1371,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16.
Saurin AJ,
Borden KLB,
Boddy MN,
Freemont PS:
Does this have a familiar RING?
Trends Biochem Sci
21:208,
1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Daniel MT,
Koken M,
Romagné O,
Barbey S,
Bazarbachi A,
Stadler M,
Guillemin MC,
Degos L,
Chomienne C,
de Thé H:
PML protein expression in hematopoietic and acute promyelocytic leukemia cells.
Blood
82:1858,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18.
Weis K,
Rambaud S,
Lavau C,
Jansen J,
Carvalho T,
Carmo-Fonseca M,
Lamond A,
Dejean A:
Retinoic acid regulates aberrant nuclear localization of PML-RAR in acute promyelocytic leukaemia cells.
Cell
76:345,
1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Dyck JA,
Maul GG,
Miller WH,
Chen JD,
Kakizuka A,
Evans RM:
A novel macromolecular structure is a target of the promyelocyte-retinoic acid receptor oncoprotein.
Cell
76:333,
1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Koken MHM,
Puvion-Dutilleul F,
Guillemin MC,
Viron A,
Linares-Cruz G,
Stuurman N,
de Jong L,
Szostecki C,
Calvo F,
Chomienne C,
Degos L,
Puvion E,
de Thé H:
The t(15; 17) translocation alters a nuclear body in a retinoic acid-reversible fashion.
EMBO J
13:1073,
1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Korioth F,
Gieffers C,
Maul GG,
Frey J:
Molecular characterization of NDP52, a novel protein of the nuclear domain 10, which is redistributed upon virus infection and interferon treatment.
J Cell Biol
130:1,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22.
Szostecki C,
Guldner HH,
Netter HJ,
Will H:
Isolation and characterization of cDNA encoding a human nuclear antigen predominantly recognized by autoantibodies from patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
J Immunol
145:4338,
1990[Abstract]
23.
Bloch DB,
de la Monte SM,
Guigaouri P,
Filippov A,
Bloch KD:
Identification and characterization of a leukocyte-specific component of the nuclear body.
J Biol Chem
271:29198,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24.
Boddy MN,
Howe K,
Etkin LD,
Solomon E,
Freemont PS:
PIC 1, a novel ubiquitin-like protein which interacts with the PML component of a multiprotein complex that is disrupted in acute promyelocytic leukaemia.
Oncogene
13:971,
1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Mu Z-M,
Chin K-V,
Liu J-H,
Lozano G,
Chang K-S:
PML, a growth suppressor disrupted in acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Mol Cell Biol
14:6858,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26.
Koken MHM,
Linares-Cruz G,
Quignon F,
Viron A,
Chelbi-Alix MK,
Sobczak-Thépot J,
Juhlin L,
Degos L,
Calvo F,
de Thé H:
The PML growth-suppressor has an altered expression in human oncogenesis.
Oncogene
10:1315,
1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Liu J-H,
Mu Z-M,
Chang K-S:
PML suppresses oncogenic transformation of NIH/3T3 cells by activated neu.
J Exp Med
181:1965,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28.
Chang K-S,
Fan Y-H,
Andreeff M,
Liu J,
Mu Z-M:
The PML gene encodes a phosphoprotein associated with the nuclear matrix.
Blood
85:3646,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29.
Grignani F,
Testa U,
Rogaia D,
Ferrucci PF,
Samoggia P,
Pinto A,
Aldinucci D,
Gelmetti V,
Fagioli M,
Alcalay M,
Seeler J,
Grignani F,
Nicoletti I,
Peschle C,
Pelicci PG:
Effects on differentiation by the promyelocytic leukemia PML/RAR protein depend on the fusion of the PML protein dimerization and RAR DNA binding domains.
EMBO J
15:4949,
1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
de Thé H,
Lavau C,
Marchio A,
Chomienne C,
Degos L,
Dejean A:
The PML-RAR fusion mRNA generated by the t(15; 17) translocation in acute promyelocytic leukemia encodes a functionally altered RAR.
Cell
66:675,
1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Pandolfi PP,
Grignani F,
Alcalay M,
Mencarelli A,
Biondi A,
Lo Coco F,
Grignani F,
Pelicci PG:
Structure and origin of the acute promyelocytic leukemia myl/RAR cDNA and characterization of its retinoid-binding and transactivation properties.
Oncogene
6:1285,
1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Kastner P,
Perez A,
Lutz Y,
Rochette-Egly C,
Gaub M-P,
Durand B,
Lanotte M,
Berger R,
Chambon P:
Structure, localisation and transcriptional properties of two classes of retinoic acid receptor fusion proteins in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL): Structural similarities with a new family of oncoproteins.
EMBO J
11:629,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Raelson JV,
Nervi C,
Rosenauer A,
Benedetti L,
Monczak Y,
Pearson M,
Pelicci PG,
Miller WH:
The PML/RAR oncoprotein is a direct molecular target of retinoic acid in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells.
Blood
88:2826,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34.
Yoshida H,
Kitamura K,
Tanaka K,
Omura S,
Miyazaki T,
Hachiya T,
Ohno R,
Naoe T:
Accelerated degradation of PML-Retinoic acid receptor (PML-RARA) oncoprotein by all-trans-retinoic acid in acute promyelocytic leukemia: Possible role of the proteosome pathway.
Cancer Res
56:2945,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35.
Rosenauer A,
Raelson JV,
Nervi C,
Eydoux P,
DeBlasio A,
Miller WH:
Alterations in expression, binding to ligand and DNA, and transcriptional activity of rearranged and wild-type retinoid receptors in retinoid-resistant acute promyelocytic leukemia cell-lines.
Blood
88:2671,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36.
Warrell RP,
Frankel SR,
Miller WH,
Scheinberg DA,
Itri LM,
Hittelman WN,
Vyas R,
Andreeff M,
Tafuri A,
Jakubowski A,
Gabrilove J,
Gordon MS,
Dmitrovsky E:
Differentiation therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia with tretinoin (all-trans-retinoic acid).
N Engl J Med
324:1385,
1991[Abstract]
37.
Chen Z-X,
Xue Y-Q,
Zhang R,
Tao R,
Xia X,
Li C,
Wang W,
Zu W,
Yao X,
Ling B:
A clinical and experimental study on all-trans-retinoic acid-treated acute promyelocytic leukemia patients.
Blood
78:1413,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38.
Castaigne S,
Chomienne C,
Daniel MT,
Ballerini P,
Berger R,
Fenaux P,
Degos L:
All-trans retinoic acid as a differentiation therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia. I. Clinical results.
Blood
76:1704,
1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Fenaux P, Chastang C, Castaigne S, Archimbaud E, Sanz M, Link H, Guerci A, Fegueux N, Zittoun R, Stoppa AM, Travade P, Lamy T, Maloisel F, Sadoun A, San Miguel J, Veil A, Rayon C, Conde E, Fey M, Bordessoule D, Ganser A, Bowen D, Dreyfus F, Huguet F, Tilly H, Guy H, Auzanneau G, Chomienne C, Degos L: Treatment of newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with all-transretinoic acid (ATRA) followed by intensive chemotherapy (CT). Updated results of the European group. Blood 84:379a, 1994 (abstr, suppl 1)
40. Tallman MS, Andersen J, Schiffer CA, Appelbaum FR, Feusner JE, Woods WG, Ogden A, Weinstein H, Shepherd L, Rowe JM, Wiernik PH: Phase III randomized study of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) vs daunorubicin (D) and cytosine arabinoside (A) as induction therapy and ATRA vs observation as maintenance therapy for patients with previously untreated acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Blood 86:125a, 1995 (abstr, suppl 1)
41.
Licht JD,
Chomienne C,
Goy A,
Chen A,
Scott AA,
Head DR,
Michaux JL,
Wu Y,
DeBlasio A,
Miller WH,
Zelenetz AD,
Willman CL,
Chen Z,
Chen S-J,
Zelent A,
Macintyre E,
Veil A,
Cortes J,
Kantarjian H,
Waxman S:
Clinical and molecular characterization of a rare syndrome of acute promyelocytic leukemia associated with translocation (11; 17).
Blood
85:1083,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42.
Larson RA,
Kondo K,
Vardiman JW,
Butler AE,
Golomb HM,
Rowley JD:
Evidence for a 15; 17 translocation in every patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Am J Med
76:827,
1984[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Borrow J,
Shipley J,
Howe K,
Kiely F,
Goddard A,
Sheer D,
Srivastava A,
Antony AC,
Fioretos T,
Mitelman F,
Solomon E:
Molecular analysis of simple variant translocations in acute promyelocytic leukaemia.
Genes Chromosom Cancer
9:234,
1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Hiorns LR,
Min T,
Swansbury GJ,
Zelent A,
Dyer MJS,
Catovsky D:
Interstitial insertion of retinoic acid receptor- gene in acute promyelocytic leukemia with normal chromosomes 15 and 17.
Blood
83:2946,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45.
Chen S-J,
Zelent A,
Tong J-H,
Yu H-Q,
Wang Z-Y,
Derré J,
Berger R,
Waxman S,
Chen Z:
Rearrangements of the retinoic acid receptor alpha and promyelocytic zinc finger genes resulting from t(11; 17)(q23; q21) in a patient with acute promyelocytic leukaemia.
J Clin Invest
91:2260,
1993
46.
Redner RL,
Rush EA,
Faas S,
Rudert WA,
Corey SJ:
The t(5; 17) variant of acute promyelocytic leukemia expresses a nucleophosmin-retinoic acid receptor fusion.
Blood
87:882,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47.
Wells RA,
Catzavelos C,
Kamel-Reid S:
Fusion of retinoic acid receptor to NUMA, the nuclear mitolic apparatus protein, by a variant translocation in acute promyelocytic leukaemia.
Nat Genet
17:109,
1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
48.
Pandolfi PP:
PML, PLZF and NPM genes in the molecular pathogenesis of acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Haematologica
81:472,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49.
Webber LM,
Garson OM:
Fluorodeoxyuridine synchronization of bone marrow cultures.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet
8:123,
1982
50.
Grimwade D,
Howe K,
Langabeer S,
Burnett A,
Goldstone A,
Solomon E:
Minimal residual disease detection in acute promyelocytic leukemia by reverse-transcriptase PCR: Evaluation of PML-RAR and RAR -PML assessment in patients who ultimately relapse.
Leukemia
10:61,
1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
51.
Borrow J,
Goddard AD,
Gibbons B,
Katz F,
Swirsky D,
Fioretos T,
Dube I,
Winfield DA,
Kingston J,
Hagemeijer A,
Rees JKH,
Lister TA,
Solomon E:
Diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukaemia by RT-PCR: Detection of PML-RARA and RARA-PML fusion transcripts.
Br J Haematol
82:529,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
52.
Flenghi L,
Fagioli M,
Tomassoni L,
Pileri S,
Gambacorta M,
Pacini R,
Grignani F,
Casini T,
Ferrucci PF,
Martelli MF,
Pelicci PG,
Falini B:
Characterization of a new monoclonal antibody (PG-M3) directed against the aminoterminal portion of the PML gene product: Immunocytochemical evidence for high expression of PML proteins on activated macrophages, endothelial cells, and epithelia.
Blood
85:1871,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53.
Chen Z,
Brand NJ,
Chen A,
Chen S-J,
Tong J-H,
Wang Z-Y,
Waxman S,
Zelent A:
Fusion between a novel Krüppel-like zinc finger gene and the retinoic acid receptor- locus due to a variant t(11; 17) translocation associated with acute promyelocytic leukaemia.
EMBO J
12:1161,
1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Vickers M: Estimation of the number of mutations necessary to cause chronic myeloid and acute promyelocytic leukaemias from epidemiologic data. Br J Haematol 93:60, 1996 (abstr, suppl 1)
55.
Sitterlin D,
Tiollais P,
Transy C:
The RAR -PLZF chimera associated with acute promyelocytic leukemia has retained a sequence-specific DNA-binding domain.
Oncogene
14:1067,
1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
56.
Licht JD,
Shaknovich R,
English MA,
Melnick A,
Li J-Y,
Reddy JC,
Dong S,
Chen S-J,
Zelent A,
Waxman S:
Reduced and altered DNA-binding and transcriptional properties of the PLZF-retinoic acid receptor- chimera generated in t(11; 17)-associated acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Oncogene
12:323,
1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
57.
Dong S,
Zhu J,
Reid A,
Strutt P,
Guidez F,
Zhong H-J,
Wang Z-Y,
Licht J,
Waxman S,
Chomienne C,
Chen Z,
Zelent A,
Chen S-J:
Amino-terminal protein-protein interaction motif (POZ-domain) is responsible for activities of the promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger-retinoic acid receptor- fusion protein.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:3624,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
58.
Reid A,
Gould A,
Brand N,
Cook M,
Strutt P,
Li J,
Licht J,
Waxman S,
Krumlauf R,
Zelent A:
Leukemia translocation gene, PLZF, is expressed with a speckled nuclear pattern in early hematopoietic progenitors.
Blood
86:4544,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. Yeyati PL, Shaknovich R, Zelent A, Li J, Waxman S, Licht JD: Cyclin A is a candidate target gene for the promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein. Blood 88:291a,1996 (abstr, suppl 1)
60.
Chen Z,
Guidez F,
Rousselot P,
Agadir A,
Chen S-J,
Wang Z-Y,
Degos L,
Zelent A,
Waxman S,
Chomienne C:
PLZF-RAR fusion proteins generated from the variant t(11; 17)(q23; q21) translocation in acute promyelocytic leukaemia inhibit ligand-dependent transactivation of wild-type retinoic acid receptors.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:1178,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
61. Ruthardt M, Testa U, Nervi C, Riganelli D, Ferrucci PF, Grignani F, Alcalay M, Puccetti E, Grignani F, Peschle C, Hoelzer D, Pelicci PG: Genetic determination of retinoic acid response in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 88:551a, 1996 (abstr, suppl 1)
62. Koken M, Reid A, Quignon F, Dong S, Chen Z, Strutt P, Licht J, Waxman S, de Thé H, Zelent A: Products of the PML and PLZF genes translocated with the RAR locus in acute promyelocytic leukemia co-localize in the nucleus and interact with each other in vivo. Blood 88:553a, 1996 (abstr, suppl 1)
63.
Matunis MJ,
Coutavas E,
Blobel G:
A novel ubiquitin-like modification modulates the partitioning of the Ran-GTPase-activating protein RanGAP1 between the cytosol and the nuclear pore complex.
J Cell Biol
135:1457,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
64.
Mahajan R,
Delphin C,
Guan T,
Gerace L,
Melchior F:
A small ubiquitin-related polypeptide involved in targeting RanGAP1 to nuclear pore complex protein RanBP2.
Cell
88:97,
1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
65.
Dyck J,
Warrell RP,
Evans RM,
Miller WH:
Rapid diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia by immunohistochemical localization of PML/RAR- protein.
Blood
86:862,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Sanz, D. Grimwade, M. S. Tallman, B. Lowenberg, P. Fenaux, E. H. Estey, T. Naoe, E. Lengfelder, T. Buchner, H. Dohner, et al.
Management of acute promyelocytic leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet
Blood,
February 26, 2009;
113(9):
1875 - 1891.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Mrozek, G. Marcucci, P. Paschka, S. P. Whitman, and C. D. Bloomfield
Clinical relevance of mutations and gene-expression changes in adult acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics: are we ready for a prognostically prioritized molecular classification?
Blood,
January 15, 2007;
109(2):
431 - 448.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Grimwade, S. V. Outram, R. Flora, S. J. Ings, A. R. Pizzey, R. Morilla, C. F. Craddock, D. C. Linch, and E. Solomon
The T-Lineage-affiliated CD2 Gene Lies within an Open Chromatin Environment in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Cells
Cancer Res.,
August 15, 2002;
62(16):
4730 - 4735.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Falini and D. Y. Mason
Proteins encoded by genes involved in chromosomal alterations in lymphoma and leukemia: clinical value of their detection by immunocytochemistry
Blood,
January 15, 2002;
99(2):
409 - 426.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. G. Thomas, J. M. Olson, S. J. Tapscott, and L. P. Zhao
An Efficient and Robust Statistical Modeling Approach to Discover Differentially Expressed Genes Using Genomic Expression Profiles
Genome Res.,
July 1, 2001;
11(7):
1227 - 1236.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. F. Ferrara, F. Fazi, A. Bianchini, F. Padula, V. Gelmetti, S. Minucci, M. Mancini, P. G. Pelicci, F. L. Coco, and C. Nervi
Histone Deacetylase-targeted Treatment Restores Retinoic Acid Signaling and Differentiation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cancer Res.,
January 1, 2001;
61(1):
2 - 7.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Sainty, V. Liso, A. Cantu-Rajnoldi, D. Head, M.-J. Mozziconacci, C. Arnoulet, L. Benattar, S. Fenu, M. Mancini, E. Duchayne, et al.
A new morphologic classification system for acute promyelocytic leukemia distinguishes cases with underlying PLZF/RARA gene rearrangements
Blood,
August 15, 2000;
96(4):
1287 - 1296.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Grimwade, A. Biondi, M.-J. Mozziconacci, A. Hagemeijer, R. Berger, M. Neat, K. Howe, N. Dastugue, J. Jansen, I. Radford-Weiss, et al.
Characterization of acute promyelocytic leukemia cases lacking the classic t(15;17): results of the European Working Party
Blood,
August 15, 2000;
96(4):
1297 - 1308.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. L. Coco, D. Diverio, B. Falini, A. Biondi, C. Nervi, and P. G. Pelicci
Genetic Diagnosis and Molecular Monitoring in the Management of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia
Blood,
July 1, 1999;
94(1):
12 - 22.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. K. Burnett, D. Grimwade, E. Solomon, K. Wheatley, and A. H. Goldstone
Presenting White Blood Cell Count and Kinetics of Molecular Remission Predict Prognosis in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Treated With All-Trans Retinoic Acid: Result of the Randomized MRC Trial
Blood,
June 15, 1999;
93(12):
4131 - 4143.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Melnick and J. D. Licht
Deconstructing a Disease: RAR{alpha}, Its Fusion Partners, and Their Roles in the Pathogenesis of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia
Blood,
May 15, 1999;
93(10):
3167 - 3215.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Grimwade, H. Walker, F. Oliver, K. Wheatley, C. Harrison, G. Harrison, J. Rees, I. Hann, R. Stevens, A. Burnett, et al.
The Importance of Diagnostic Cytogenetics on Outcome in AML: Analysis of 1,612 Patients Entered Into the MRC AML 10 Trial
Blood,
October 1, 1998;
92(7):
2322 - 2333.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|