Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aricò, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pui, C.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aricò, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pui, C.-H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Review Articles
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, Vol. 90 No. 2 (July 15), 1997: pp. 479-488

REVIEW ARTICLE

Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia

By Maurizio Aricò, Andrea Biondi, and Ching-Hon Pui

From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Department of Pediatrics, University of Milano, Ospedale S. Gerardo, Monza, Italy; Departments of Hematology-Oncology and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and the University of Tennessee, Memphis, College of Medicine, Memphis, TN.

    INTRODUCTION
Introduction
References

ABOUT 40 YEARS ago two forms of chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML) were recognized in children. One had the typical features of CML of adulthood and usually appeared in children older than 4 years; the other affected younger children and presented as a myelomonocytic proliferation associated with hemorrhage, infection, lymphadenopathy, and skin rash. The prognosis of the latter group of patients was invariably poor.1-3 In subsequent attempts to identify clinico-biological features that would further discriminate between these leukemias, Reisman and Trujillo4 found the absence of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome to be a hallmark of the juvenile-type entity (JCML). Signs of disturbed erythropoiesis were also reported to be typical of JCML, including low levels of hemoglobin (Hb) A2 and erythrocyte carbonic anhydrase,5 together with a marked increase of HbF,6 and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity.7 Maurer and others concluded that JCML is accompanied by a reversion to fetal-like erythropoiesis.8-10 The observation of chromosomal translocations in leukemic bone marrow cells of different lineages suggested that the pathologic process might involve a multipotent stem cell.7,11 We review here the salient clinical and biological features of this disease, emphasizing recent advances in its treatment and in understanding its pathological origin.

In an effort to resolve most of the above described discrepancies, the International Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia Working Group has recently proposed the term juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML; R. Castleberry, personal communication, December 1996), which has been accepted and widely used in some recent publications.21-23 It will be used throughout the remainder of this review.

    CLASSIFICATION

The classification of chronic childhood myeloproliferative disorders remains controversial. Although the proposed categories of the French-American-British (FAB) system do not always correspond to the clinical features of such cases,12 they still constitute the standard for comparative evaluation of different series of patients. Patients who present with peripheral blood monocytosis and bone marrow dysplasia (often in association with monosomy 7) with a morphological picture of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) in the absence of the t(9; 22) translocation are generally considered to have the juvenile form of CML. However, in different reports, patients sharing most of the above features are variously described as having JCML,7,8,10,13-15 monosomy 7 syndrome,16,17 or CMML in accord with the FAB system.12,18,19 Using features such as cytogenetic abnormalities and pretreatment HbF level, Passmore et al20 recently reclassified their cases as (1) JCML if there was CMML cellular morphology and raised HbF (>10%), and no monosomy 7; or (2) infantile monosomy 7 syndrome if the presenting age was less than 4 years, with any type of myelodysplasia and monosomy 7. All other patients, including older children with monosomy 7, were classified according to FAB criteria. The revised classification led the authors to propose a new prognostic scoring system.20 Although the aim of providing an improved system of risk assessment is laudable, the utility of the scoring system proposed by Passmore et al20 may be compromised by the criteria they used to reclassify cases of childhood myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). In particular, some categories, such as the monosomy 7 syndrome, are widely debated or not accepted by some investigators.18,19 Thus, the uncertainty of diagnostic criteria in this group of disorders can be expected to limit the utility of the proposed scoring system.

    EPIDEMIOLOGY

The exact incidence of JMML is not yet known. In the only population-based study reported to date,18,24 JMML accounted for 18% of all cases of myelodysplastic syndrome in children less than 15 years old and 1.62% of all hematologic malignancies (0.61 new cases per year per million children at risk). The disease predominates in children younger than 4 years with 40% of cases occurring before the age of 1 year and 60% before the age of 2; however, 26% of patients with JMML are 3 years of age or older. Boys are affected more often than girls (M/F ratio, 2.5). Associated conditions include neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)25-27 in 7%, and a variety of occasional clinical abnormalities in an additional 9% of cases. At least three pairs of affected twins have been described.15,20,28 In another study, an identical twin was healthy at the time his brother presented with JMML and remained free of leukemia during preparation of the written report.29

    CLINICAL AND LABORATORY FEATURES

The onset of JMML is often heralded by acute or subacute symptoms of a recent infection. Table 1 summarizes clinical and laboratory features of patients variably referred to as juvenile chronic granulocytic leukemia (JCGL),11,29 JCML,13,15,20,30-35,36,37-42 CMML20,28,43 or monosomy 7.20,40 As shown, more than half of the patients have fever and signs of respiratory involvement, such as pharyngo-tonsillitis or bronchitis; pulmonary infection is infrequent. Bleeding symptoms are observed in about 50% of cases. Prominent findings are those common to most proliferative diseases: enlarged spleen, hepatomegaly, and lymphadenopathy. Skin involvement is apparent in about one half of the patients, with maculo-papular rash (often starting from the face) and xanthomas, or cafe-au-lait spots, seen in patients with NF1.

 
View this table:
[in this window] [in a new window]
  		Table 1. Presenting Features of Children With JMML

Leukocyte counts tend to remain less than 50 × 109/L; in fact, fewer than 8% of cases have counts greater than 100 × 109/L. Monocytosis exceeding 5 × 109/L with circulating immature myeloid cells, erythroblasts, and a few blasts (<3% in 56% cases) are typical findings. A decreased leukocyte alkaline phosphatase score is not characteristic, occurring in less than 50% of the patients. The Hb level is usually low and is accompanied by erythrocyte abnormalities and low serum iron concentrations. An altered Hb pattern affords a readily accessible and reliable marker of JMML; at diagnosis the HbA2 concentration is reduced, whereas HbF level greater than 10% is found in two-thirds of patients. Thrombocytopenia is common and often severe. Elevated levels of serum vitamin B12 are frequently observed and appear related to active protein synthesis by granulocytes.44 Polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia is also common, but its significance remains unclear.45 Increased serum levels of lysozyme are reported in two thirds of the patients in association with a higher number of immature circulating granulocytic precursors.19 Autoantibodies with different reactivities (antinuclear type or positive Coombs test) and no apparent clinical relevance have been observed in fewer than one fourth of the patients.19

An analysis of peripheral blood usually provides more reliable diagnostic information than does an examination of the bone marrow smear. Typically, marrow cellularity is increased, with the vast majority of cells belonging to the myeloid series in all stages of maturation. Monocytes account for 5% to 10% of all myeloid cells, with the blast cell population far below the level seen in acute leukemia. Follow-up marrow evaluations rarely yield informative results. In contrast to other types of childhood leukemia, JMML has few discernible constitutional or clonal chromosome abnormalities, partly explaining the slow progress in understanding the pathobiology of this disease. In one study, 68% of the reported cases of JMML lacked cytogenetic abnormalities, the remainder having either dissimilar lesions (16%) or monosomy 7 (16%).46-48

More recently in a retrospective analysis of 110 patients defined by entry criteria and treated in five European countries,19 the European Working Group on Myelodysplastic Syndromes in childhood (EWOG-MDS) found a constellation of features to have diagnostic relevance: hepatosplenomegaly in greater than 90%, lymphadenopathy in 76%, pallor in 64%, fever in 54%, skin rash in 36%, absence of the 9; 22 translocation, bone marrow blasts less than 20%, and peripheral blood monocytosis greater than 1 cell × 109/L. Additional criteria required for definite diagnosis included at least two of the following: spontaneous in vitro growth of granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (CFU-GM), HbF elevated for age, peripheral blood myeloid precursors, leukocyte count greater than 10 × 109/L, and chromosomal abnormalities.

    NATURAL COURSE OF THE DISEASE AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS

The observation of patients who either were not treated or did not respond to treatment has provided useful information on the natural history of JMML. Approximately one third of the patients present with a rapidly progressive disease in which cachexia, organomegaly, and complications of marrow failure may lead to early death, whether or not treatment is instigated. About another third of the patients show a more indolent disease course characterized by clinical improvement with partial or even complete normalization of the blood count after minimal or no treatment. Such patients may enjoy a stable clinical remission, even when there is persistence of a variable pattern of disease markers, including splenomegaly, moderate leukocytosis, or monocytosis. During this true chronic phase of the disease, they may occasionally experience reactivation of their leukemia, sometimes in association with infectious episodes. Because these episodes are often self-limiting, introduction of chemotherapy at this time may produce what appears to be a clinical response. The ultimate outcome of leukemia is difficult to predict, but a significant proportion of patients eventually develop massive disease reactivation evolving into a rapid progression, often referred to as blastic crisis.15,29,49 The remaining patients have an intermediate prognosis.

Because the course of JMML is highly variable and the therapeutic choices wide, some investigators have attempted to identify factors that predict outcome or at least time to progression. The major role in defining prognosis seems to be played by age at the time of disease onset. Most published series support the generalization that children who develop the disease when younger than 1 or 2 years have a longer survival.15,20,30,50 In our review, infants younger than 1 year of age had a significantly higher probability of long-term survival than did older patients; there was no significant difference between infants presenting at the age of less than 6 months or 6 to 12 months. These relationships were valid whether patients treated with bone marrow transplantation were excluded (Fig 1) or included (not shown) in the analysis. This analysis should be regarded with caution both because we can only refer to published data and because data were taken from sources without uniform entry criteria and do not represent randomized clinical trials.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig 1. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of 177 children with JMML according to age at the diagnosis. The curves were generated by pooling the data from the following references, by including only cases for which both informations (ie, age at diagnosis and duration of survival) were available.8,11,13,27,28,30-37,41,47,82,85,97-99,101,103

Among the proposed unfavorable risk factors are a low platelet count and an increased HbF level15,20 (Table 2). In a recent review of their single-center series of childhood MDS patients, Passmore et al20 advocated a pediatric scoring system based on HbF level, platelet count, and cytogenetic results. The so-called FPC score was predictive of a good prognosis (60% survival at 5 years) when HbF was greater than 10%, platelets greater than 40 × 109/L, and clonal cytogenetic abnormalities were absent.

 
View this table:
[in this window] [in a new window]
  		Table 2. Unfavorable Prognostic Factors in JMML

    PATHOBIOLOGY

Two consistent abnormalities have been shown by in vitro studies of JMML patients: the exuberant spontaneous growth of colony forming units-granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM) in the absence of exogenous growth factors,51-54 and the impaired growth of normal hemopoietic progenitors. Spontaneous cell growth has been ascribed to the peculiar hypersensitivity of the JMML bone marrow or peripheral blood progenitors to very low levels of cytokines and growth factors probably produced by adherent cells.55 Removal of monocytes by adherence to plastic before culture of bone marrow or peripheral blood progenitor cells abrogates spontaneous growth.55 The observed hypersensitivity response appears to be quite selective, as it occurs in tests with GM-CSF, but not other growth factors regulating early steps of myelopoiesis, such as inteleukin-3 (IL-3) or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF ).52 To date, binding studies and molecular analysis of the GM-CSF receptor have shown no abnormality,56 although several provocative clues have emerged (Fig 2). During neoplastic transformation of myeloid progenitors, RAS genes often acquire activating point mutations that lead to elevated levels of Ras-GTP, resulting in constitutive activation of this common signal transduction pathway.57 In this regard, mutated RAS genes have been found in 30% of cases of JMML.34,58-60 In one series most of the patients with mutated RAS were in the older age group with poor prognosis.34 Loss of the normal NF1 allele is a common finding in JMML cells from patients with NF1.61,62 As a tumor suppressor, the NF1 protein acts as GTPase, which in turn downregulates Ras-GTP. Primary leukemic cells from children with NF1 show a selective decrease in NF1-like GTPase activating protein (GAP) activity for RAS, but retain normal cellular GAP activity. Leukemic cells also show an elevated percentage of Ras in the GTP-bound conformation.63 These genetic and biochemical data from studies of primary JMML cells strongly support the hypothesis that inactivation of NF1 with consequent Ras deregulation plays an important role in leukemogenesis in children with NF1 who develop JMML. This idea is reinforced by a number of observations in mice with a targeted disruption of Nf1. First, heterozygous Nf1 mice are predisposed to myeloid leukemia and these leukemias delete the wild-type Nf1 allele.64 Second, fetal hematopoietic cells from embryos with homozygous inactivation of Nf1 show a pattern of selective in vitro GM-CSF hypersensitivity that is reminiscent of that seen in JMML.62,63 Finally, transplanting these Nf1 -/- fetal liver cells into irradiated recipients consistently induces a myeloproliferative disorder with clinical and pathologic features of JMML62 (K.M. Shannon, personal communication, December 1996). Taken together these human and murine data point to deregulated signaling through the RAS pathway as the central event in the abnormal growth of JMML progenitor cells. Activation of the JAK-2 tyrosine kinase65 or overexpression of the Shc proteins57 might represent an additional mechanism(s) to be involved in GM-CSF hypersensitivity.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig 2. Schematic diagram of GM-CSF signal transduction from cell surface to nucleus. GM-CSF binds to the alpha and beta subunits of its cell surface receptor. Two distinct signaling pathways are triggered by GM-CSF: the Ras signaling pathway and the one that involves activation of the Jak2 tyrosine kinase. The first one includes Shc phosphorylation, increases in GTP-bound Ras and activation of mitogen activated (MAP) kinases. The presence of RAS points mutations or the inactivation of neurofibromin (the protein encoded by the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene, NF1 ), constitutively activate the Ras pathway by increasing intracellular levels of Ras-GTP. Modified from Emanuel et al.23

Several other cytokines secreted by malignant JMML cells have been implicated in autocrine or paracrine pathways of growth stimulation in JMML54 or in suppression of normal hematopoiesis.53 Bagby et al54 reported that monocytes from these patients secrete high levels of IL-1, which in turn stimulate the release of another growth factor(s) by normal accessory cells. In recent studies, an IL-1 receptor antagonist was reported to inhibit spontaneous JMML proliferation in vitro.66 Tumor necrosis factor (TNF ) alpha has been suggested to inhibit normal hematopoietic progenitors,53 resulting in anemia and thrombocytopenia, both clinical hallmarks of JMML.

The involvement of the erythroid lineage is a common feature of JMML, as indicated by the presence of mature but morphologically aberrant erythroid cells, the conversion to a fetal-type erythropoiesis, and the abnormal in vitro growth properties of peripheral erythroid progenitors.52,67 Cytogenetic analysis of burst-forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E) colonies from patients with a chromosome marker suggested that JMML may arise from early progenitors capable to differentiate into monocytic-macrophage-erythroid cells.38,39 The involvement of the erythroid lineage in this clonal disorder has been also confirmed by the observation of increased expression of GATA-1, erythropoietin receptor, and alpha and gamma globin genes in JMML.68 More recently, loss of the normal NF1 allele in erythroblasts harvested from the BFU-E colonies of JMML patients has added support to this hypothesis.69

Several lines of evidence indicate the clonal nature of JMML. First, clonality was shown by the presence of a cytogenetic marker in the bone marrow of rare patients with JMML,38 and more recently by a clonal pattern of X chromosome inactivation in girls with this disease.56 Loss of the normal NF1 allele in CD34+ cells in some JMML patients represents a third independent line of evidence.69 Cell separation studies have also traced the origin of JMML stem cells to the level of the most primitive myeloid progenitor.56,69 Highly purified CD34+ CD38- early progenitor cells (as well as the reticulocytes, platelets, monocytes, and granulocytes) from a JMML patient have been shown to be clonally derived when examined by HUMARA (human androgen receptor assay).56 Loss of the normal NF1 allele in unfractionated bone marrow samples and in CD34+ cells lends further support to this view. The chronic and rapidly progressive (blast crisis) phase of JMML15 is likely to have the same clonal origin. In one report, a child with JMML and cytogenetic evidence of monosomy 7 developed pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia49; the karyotypic analysis of the lymphoblasts in this case confirmed the presence of monosomy 7, as typically seen in pure stem cell disorders such as the Ph-chromosome-positive CML, in which involvement of both lymphocytes and myeloid cells is well recognized.70 Whether JMML represents a true stem cell disorder or the consequence of malignant transformation occurring in hematopoietic cells restricted to the myeloid differentiation remains controversial. Miles et al69 recently reported the retention of the normal NF1 allele in cell lines derived from pre-B lymphocytes of a JMML patient carrying an NF1 gene mutation. However, Nf1 -/- cells can reconstitute both myeloid and lymphoid cells in mice, but abnormal proliferation is observed only in the myeloid compartment63 (K.M. Shannon, personal communication, December 1996). The recent successful engraftment of the human JMML stem cells in primary and secondary SCID mice should provide a model with which to further delineate the stem-cell properties of JMML.71

The relationship between JMML and childhood monosomy 7 syndrome is uncertain. Both disorders share several clinical features including a young age at diagnosis, a preponderance of male patients, prominent hepatosplenomegaly, myelomonocytic proliferation, increased frequency of NF1, and a poor prognosis when treatment consists of chemotherapy without marrow rescue.16,72-74 However, JMML patients without demonstrable monosomy 7 tend to have higher HbF levels,19 more pronounced lymphadenopathy, and more severe skin rashes than do patients with monosomy 7, who show a tendency to develop leukopenia and bacterial infections.16,72-75 The majority of patients with JMML do not have monosomy 7 at diagnosis, whereas others acquire the cytogenetic abnormality only at the time of the disease progression.28,41 In a study that failed to detect the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of chromosome 7 in patients with JMML, Butcher et al76 speculated that JMML and monosomy 7 are distinct disorders that share some, but not all, of the multiple steps commonly seen in malignant transformation. This idea has gained further support from a recent study in which molecular analysis failed to show microscopic deletions of 7q in 22 cases of JMML.77

    TREATMENT

The treatment of JMML continues to generate controversy. Early therapeutic attempts by Lilleymann, using sequential subcutaneous cytarabine and oral mercaptopurine, provided some improvement in the condition of patients, but not in survival time.13 Castro-Malaspina et al15 reported the failure of various treatment modalities, including chemotherapy with 6-mercaptopurine (with or without prednisone) in 27 patients and more intensive chemotherapy in four patients. Regardless of the type of regimen, chemotherapy never resulted in a complete remission (CR) in this large series. These investigators concluded that neither splenectomy nor radiotherapy nor moderate or intensive chemotherapy was of value in the treatment of JMML. Thus, during a period when vastly improved results were being reported for most childhood leukemias, the prognosis for JMML remained poor.

Experience over the past decade suggests that a subset of patients with JMML will become long-term survivors when treated exclusively with chemotherapy. Chan et al32 treated four children with an intensive AML-type regimen, three of whom relapsed after 11 to 21 months with one remaining in CR at 27 months follow-up. The outcome was superior to that in five children, who received less intensive therapy, all of whom died within 1 to 29 months. Despite obtaining hematological remission, ie, reversal of the blood counts to normal within 4 to 8 weeks of initiating therapy, with intensive chemotherapy, usually directed to AML, Festa et al33 were unable to eradicate extramedullary disease in their six patients, who all showed persistent hepatosplenomegaly and thus failure to achieve complete remission; all of the patients experienced hematologic relapse and died of disease at a median of 8 months. In his recent report on the use of intensive chemotherapy for childhood MDS, Hasle et al78 described 20 patients with this syndrome, including 8 with CMML who were treated with AML-type therapy; only 2 entered remission.

In our literature review we identified 171 children treated for JMML, with or without bone marrow rescue, for whom there was adequate information to correlate the duration of survival with the type of therapy. Fourteen of the 50 nonintensively treated patients (28%) were still alive after 1 to 307 months of follow-up (median 9 months), compared with only 3 of 30 (10%) who received intensive chemotherapy (surviving at 32, 36, and 120 months). Comparison of estimated survival probabilities suggests that intensive chemotherapy is not superior to nonintensive chemotherapy or even to no chemotherapy (Fig 3). These findings should be interpreted with caution because again we can only refer to published data, which were taken from sources without uniform entry criteria, did not consider proposed risk factors (Table 2) and do not represent randomized clinical trials.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig 3. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of 171 children with JMML according to treatment applied as reviewed from the literature. The curves were generated by pooling the data from the following references, by including only cases for which both informations (ie, treatment applied and duration of survival) were available.13,15,19,20,27-29,31-35,37,40,43,47,79,82,83,85,97-103

The poor results of chemotherapy for JMML, with or without other modalities, have led to the evaluation of alternative agents, including cytokines and biological response modifiers. Castleberry et al79 recently described the efficacy of isotretinoin in producing durable clinical and laboratory responses in 10 children with this disease, two of whom had complete remissions, three partial remissions, and one a minimal response; the remaining four patients had progressive disease. Of the seven patients who did not undergo BMT, one was in complete remission 83 months after diagnosis, and two others had stable disease at 36 and 37 months while still receiving isotretinoin. Although clearly warranting further study, these data should be evaluated cautiously. First, a clinical response, defined by the authors as a reduction of leukocytosis, does not include the correction of cytopenia. Moreover, it is well known that some patients with JMML can have long periods of stable disease (up to 10 years), even when untreated. Additionally, the very young age of 10 patients who received isotretinoin (median, 10 months), probably had a favorable influence on outcome (Table 2).

The apparently increased sensitivity of the JMML cells to interferon-alpha ,14 together with successful use of interferon for CML,80 prompted some investigators to administer this cytokine to patients with the juvenile form of the disease.15,29 The results are difficult to evaluate because of the limited sample size, the heterogeneity of the presenting clinical features and the complex history of previous treatment. Nonetheless, in one series of 10 previously untreated patients, high dose interferon therapy (30 millions units/m2) appeared excessively toxic with no evidence of improved disease control.81

Currently, bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is the only therapy that clearly improves outcome in the clinical management of JMML. Of 91 patients treated with this modality in 16 different reports, 38 (41%) were still alive, including 30 of the 60 patients who received grafts from HLA-matched or one antigen mismatched familial donor, 2 of 12 with mismatched donors, and 6 of 19 with matched unrelated donors. The estimated survival for patients treated with grafts from HLA-matched familial donors appears significantly better than results achieved with any other treatment modalities (Fig 3). Attempts to decrease the leukemic blast cell infiltrate or to ameliorate the degree of cytopenia, such as aggressive cytoreduction or splenectomy, may be helpful in some cases as a means to reduce the risk of peritransplant complications, but there is no evidence that such procedures may actually improve the survival rate or even reduce the risk of post-transplant leukemic relapse.83 The largest study of allogeneic BMT in JMML reported to date83,84 indicates that a preparative regimen consisting of busulfan and other cytotoxic drugs offers a higher likelihood of event-free-survival (due to lower rate of leukemic relapse) in children with an HLA-compatible relative donor than does any other modality including total-body-irradiation.85 As a result, this regimen is currently being used in the EWOG-BMT cooperative study.83

For patients lacking access to BMT, novel therapeutic approaches should be considered. For instance, the significant pathogenic role of IL-1 in JMML and the inhibitory effect of its neutralization on spontaneous cell proliferation in vitro66 provide a compelling rationale for experimental treatment with an IL-1 receptor antagonist. Additionally, evidence of a significant in vitro inhibitory effect of IL-4 on the JMML growth pattern and GM-CSF, TNF, and IL-1 secretion86 would appear to support therapeutic strategies based on this cytokine as well. Recently, IL-10 was demonstrated to inhibit the autonomous in vitro growth of marrow and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from JMML patients, most likely through suppression of endogenous GM-CSF release.87 This observation suggests therapeutic evaluation of IL-10 in JMML patients.

The potent effects of the human GM-CSF analogue E21R, which completely blocks effects of the growth factor on cell proliferation and induces apoptosis, might also offer a novel therapeutic approach.22 It may also be possible to use mutant Ras peptides as targets for specific immunotherapy.88 Finally, the observation that oncogenic Ras proteins are unable to transform tissue culture cells unless they are farnesylated suggests that FPTase inhibitors may be useful in the treatment of JMML or other neoplastic disorders in which RAS contributes to dysregulated cell growth.89,90 This concept is now under investigation in model systems.91-94

    CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of JMML is based on evidence of splenomegaly, leukocytosis in the range of 20 to 30 cells × 109/L, monocytosis greater than 1.0 × 109/L, circulating myeloid precursors, and bone marrow hypercellularity with less than 20% myeloid blasts. Evidence of spontaneous growth of myelomonocytic cells in vitro, together with the verification of the absence of the t(9; 22) or the BCR/ABL fusion protein, should be obtained in all cases. High levels of HbF (usually >10%) are readily documented and strongly support a suspected diagnosis of JMML. Although JMML and monosomy 7 are probably two distinct entities, the presence of this cytogenetic abnormality should not be considered a diagnostic contraindication of JMML; patients with well-documented evidence of JMML and age greater than 1 year at disease onset should be considered at higher risk for rapidly progressive disease and thus possible candidates for early BMT from an HLA-identical sibling or an unrelated donor. Younger patients may benefit from nonintensive treatment, such as 6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine, or isotretinoin. In general, patients should not be subjected to intensive chemotherapy or BMT with poorly matched donors unless their clinical course during the first few weeks or months is unusually aggressive or strongly suggestive of a blastic crisis. Experimental agents are justifiable in children with unfavorable risk features who lack an acceptable marrow donor. Meanwhile, it will be important to clarify the origin of fetal erythropoiesis in patients with JMML, the relationship between monosomy 796 and presenting clinical features, and the mechanisms that allow the disease to progress to blastic crisis.

    FOOTNOTES

   Submitted May 9, 1996; accepted March 24, 1997.
   Supported in part by Grants No. PO1-CA-20180 and P30 CA-21765 from the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD) (C.H.P.); by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (Memphis, TN) (C.H.P.); by Grant No. 390RCR91/01 from the IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy (M.A.); by Associazione Italiana per la ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) (A.B.); by Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (PF ACRO) No. 92.02140.PF.39 (A.B.); and by Fondazione Tettamanti (A.B.).
   Address reprint requests to Maurizio Aricò, MD, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors are indebted to Catherine Klersy, MD (Biometric Unit, Scientific Direction, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy) for statistical analysis; Franco Locatelli, MD, Kevin Shannon, MD, Robert Castleberry, MD, and Charlotte Niemeyer, MD, for their critical comments and for sharing unpublished data; and John Gilbert for editorial review.

    REFERENCES
Introduction
References

1. Eisenberg AA, Wallerstein H: Chronic myelosis in children. J Lab Clin Med 19:713, 1934

2. Cooke JV: Chronic myelogenous leukemia in children. J Pediatr 42:537, 1953

3. Bernard J, Mathe G, Delorme JC, Barnoud O: La leucemie myeloide chronique de l'enfant. Arch Fr Pediatr 19:881, 1962[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Reisman LE, Trujillo JM: Chronic granulocytic leukemia of childhood. Clinical and cytogenetic studies. J Pediatr 62:710, 1963

5. Weatherall DJ, Edwards JA, Donohoe WTA: Hemoglobin and red cell enzymes changes in juvenile myeloid leukemia. BMJ 1:676, 1968

6. Hardisty RM, Speed DE, Till M: Granulocytic leukemia in childhood. Br J Haematol 10:551, 1964[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Cao A: Juvenile chronic myeloid leukemia. Lancet 1:1002, 1970[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Maurer HS, Vida LN, Honig GR: Similarities of the erythrocytes in Juvenile Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia to fetal erythropoiesis. Blood 39:778, 1972[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Wheatherall DJ, Clegg JB, Wood WG: Foetal erythropoiesis in human leukemia. Nature 257:710, 1975[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Weinberg RS, Leibowitz D, Weinblatt ME, Kochen J, Alter BP: Juvenile Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia: The only example of truly fetal (not fetal-like) erythropoiesis. Br J Haematol 76:307, 1990[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Altman AJ, Palmer CG, Baehner RL: Juvenile "Chronic Granulocytic" Leukemia: A panmielopathy with prominent monocytic involvement and circulating monocyte colony-forming cells. Blood 43:341, 1974[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Bennett M, Catovski D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton BAG, Gralnick H, Sultan C, Cox C: The chronic myeloid leukemias: Guidelines for distinguishing chronic granulocytic, atypical chronic myeloid, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Proposals by the French-American-British Cooperative leukemia group. Br J Haematol 87:746, 1994[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Lilleymann JS, Harrison JF, Black JA: Treatment of juvenile chronic myeloid leukemia with sequential subcutaneous cytarabine and oral mercaptopurine. Blood 49:559, 1977[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Estrov Z, Grunberger T, Chan H, Freedman M: Juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia: Characterization of the disease using cell cultures. Blood 67:1382, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Castro-Malaspina H, Schaison G, Passe S, Pasquier A, Berger R, Bayle-Weisgerberg C, Miller D, Seligmann M, Bernard J: Subacute and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in children (Juvenile CML). Clinical and hematologic observations, and identification of prognostic factors. Cancer 54:675, 1984[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Sieff CA, Chessels JM, Harvey BAM, Pickthall VJ, Lawler SD: Monosomy 7 in childhood: A myeloproliferative disorder. Br J Haematol 49:235, 1981[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Gyger M, Bonny Y, Forest L: Childhood monosomy 7 syndrome. Am J Hematol 13:329, 1982[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Hasle H: Myelodysplastic syndromes in childhood-Classification, epidemiology, and treatment. Leuk Lymphoma 13:11, 1994[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Niemeyer C, Aricò M, Basso G, Biondi A, Cantù Rajnoldi A, Creutzig U, Haas O, Harbott J, Hasle H, Kerndrup G, Locatelli F, Mann G, Stollmann-Gibbels B, Th Van't Veer-Korthof E, van Weering E, Zimmermann M and Members of the European Working Group on Myelodysplastic Syndromes in Childhood (EWOG-MDS): Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia in childhood: A retrospective analysis of 110 cases. Blood 89:3534, 1997

20. Passmore SJ, Hann IM, Stiller CA, Ramani P, Swansbury GJ, Gibbons B, Reeves BR, Chessels JM: Pediatric myelodysplasia: A study of 68 children and a new prognostic scoring system. Blood 85:1742, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Haas OA, Gadner H: Pathogenesis, biology, and management of myelodysplastic syndromes in children. Semin Hematol 33:225, 1996[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Iversen P, Rodwell RL, Pitcher L, Taylor KM, Lopez AF: Inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemic cells by the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor analogue E21R. Blood 86:2634, 1996

23. Emanuel PD, Shannon KM, Castleberry RP: Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia: Molecular understanding and prospects for therapy. Molec Med Today 00:468, 1996

24. Hasle H, Jacobsen BB, Pedersen NT: Myelodysplastic syndromes in childhood: A population based study of nine cases. Br J Haematol 81:495, 1992[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Royer B, Blondet C, Guilhard J: Xantholeucemie du nourisson et neurofibromatose de Recklinghausen. Ann Pediatr 5:260, 1958

26. Bader JL, Miller RW: Neurofibromatosis and childhood leukemia. J Pediatr 92:925, 1978[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Stiller CA, Chessels JM, Fitchett M: Neurofibromatosis and childhood leukemia/lymphoma: A population-based UKCCSG study. Br J Cancer 70:969, 1994[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Brandwein JM, Horsman DE, Eaves AC, Eaves CJ, Massing BG, Wadsworth LD, Rogers PCJ, Kalousek DK: Childhood myelodysplasia: Suggested classification as myelodysplastic syndromes based on laboratory and clinical findings. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 12:63, 1990[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Owen G, Lewis IJ, Morgan M, Robinson A, Stevens RF: Prognostic factors in juvenile chronic granulocytic leukemia. Br J Cancer 66:S68, 1992 (suppl XVIII)

30. Aricò M, Bossi G, Schirò R, Galimberti M, Longoni D, Macchia P, Miniero R, Natale D, Pession A, Pillon M, Santoro N, Tontoli N, Rusca MP, Biondi A for the AIEOP: Juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia: Report of the Italian Registry. Hematologica 78:264, 1993[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Donadieu J, Stephan JL, Blanche S, Cavazzana-Calvo M, Baruchel A, Herbelin C, Benkerrou M, Thomas C, Girault D, Fischer A: Treatment of juvenile chronic myelomonocytic leukemia by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 13:777, 1994[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Chan H, Estrov Z, Weitzman S, Freedman MH: The value of intensive combination chemotherapy for juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia. J Clin Oncol 5:1960, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Festa R, Shende A, Lanzkowski P: Juvenile chronic myelocytic leukemia: Experience with intensive chemotherapy. Med Pediatr Oncol 18:311, 1990[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Miyauchi J, Asada M, Sasaki M, Tsunematsu Y, Kojima S, Mizutani S: Mutations of the N-ras gene in juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood 83:2248, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Toren A, Mandel M, Amariglio N, Hakim Y, Brok-Simoni F, Rechavi G, Neumann Y, Ramot B: Lack of bcr rearrangement in juvenile chronic myeloid leukemia. Med Pediatr Oncol 19:493, 1991[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Whetherall DJ, Brown MJ: Juvenile chronic myeloid leukemia: Lancet i:526, 1970

37. Hazani A, Barak Y, Berant M, Bar-Maor A: Congenital juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia: Therapeutic trial with interferon alpha-2. Med Pediatr Oncol 21:73, 1993[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Amenomori T, Tomonaga M, Yoshida Y, Kuriyama K, Matsuo T, Jinnai I, Ichimaru M, Omiya A, Tsuji Y: Cytogenetic evidence for partially committed myeloid progenitor cell origin of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and juvenile chronic myeloid leukemia: Both granulocyte-macrophage precursors and erythroid precursors carry identical markers. Br J Haematol 64:539, 1986[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Inoue S, Shibata T, Ravindranath Y, Gohle N: Clonal origin of erythroid cells in juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood 69:975, 1987[Free Full Text]

40. Shannon KM, Watterson J, Johnson P, O'Connell P, Lange B, Shah N, Steinherz P, Kan YW, Priest JR: Monosomy 7 myeloproliferative disease in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: Epidemiology and molecular analysis. Blood 79:1311, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Kaneko Y, Maseki N, Sakurai M, Shibuya A, Shinohara T, Fujimoto T, Kanno H, Nishikawa A: Chromosome pattern in juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and acute leukemia associated with neurofibromatosis. Leukemia 3:36, 1989[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

42. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital: Case 37-1994. N Engl J Med 331:1005, 1994[Free Full Text]

43. Massaad L, Prieur M, Leonard C, Dutrillaux B: Biclonal chromosome evolution of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in a child. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 44:131, 1990[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Rachmilevitz B, Rachmilevitz M: The clinical significance of serum transcobalamin in myeloid leukemia and other myeloproliferative disorders. Isr J Med Sci 13:710, 1977[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

45. Cannat A, Seligmann M: Immunoglobulin abnormalities in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Br J Med 1:71, 1973

46. Puchkova GP, Prigogina EL, Fleishmann EV, Drosdova TS, Mayakova SA, Peterson IS: Chromosome abnormalities in chronic myeloid leukemia in children. Hum Genet 64:257, 1983[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

47. Ghione F, Mecucci C, Symann M, Michaux J-L, Casteels-Van Daele M, Van Den Berghe H: Cytogenetic investigations in childhood chronic myelocytic leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 20:317, 1986[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

48. Brodeur GM, Dow LW, Williams DL: Cytogenetic features of juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood 53:812, 1979[Free Full Text]

49. Lau RC, Squire J, Brisson L, Kamel-Reid S, Grunberger T, Dubé I, Letarte M, Shannon K, Freedman M: Lymphoid blast crisis of B-lineage phenotype with monosomy 7 in a patient with juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia (JCML). Leukemia 8:903, 1994[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

50. Pui CH, Aricò M: Isotretinoin for juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia. N Engl J Med 332:1520, 1995[Free Full Text]

51. Suda T, Miura H, Mizoguchi H: Characterization of hemopoietic precursor cells in juvenile-type chronic myelocytic leukemia. Leuk Res 6:43, 1982[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

52. Emanuel P, Bates LJ, Castleberry RP, Gualtieri RJ, Zuckerman KS: Selective hypersensitivity to granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor by juvenile chronic myeloid leukemia hemopoietic progenitors. Blood 77:925, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]

53. Freedman M, Cohen A, Grunberger T, Bunin N, Luddy RE, Saunders EF, Shahidi N, Lau A, Estrov Z: Central role of tumor necrosis factor, GM-CSF, and interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis of juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia. Br J Haematol 80:40, 1992[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

54. Bagby GC, Dinarello CA, Neerhout RC, Ridgway D, McCall E: Interleukin 1-dependent paracrine granulopoiesis in chronic granulocytic leukemia of the juvenile type. J Clin Invest 82:1430, 1988

55. Emanuel PD, Bates LJ, Zu S-W, Castlebery R, Gualtieri RJ, Zuckerman KS: The role of monocyte-derived hemopoietic growth factors in the regulation of myeloproliferation in juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia. Exp Hematol 19:1017, 1991[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

56. Busque L, Gililand DG, Prchal JT, Sieff CA, Weinstein HJ, Sokol JM, Belickova M, Wayne AS, Zuckerman KS, Sokol L, Castleberry RP, Emanuel PD: Clonality in Juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood 85:21, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

57. Lanfrancone L, Pelicci G, Brizzi MF, Arouica MG, Casciari C, Giuli S, Pegoraro L, Pawson T, Pelicci PG: Overexpression of the Shc proteins potentiates the proliferative response to the granulocyte-macropahge colony-stimulating factor and recruitment of Grb2/SoS and Grb2/p140 complexes to the B receptor subunit. Oncogene 10:907, 1995[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

58. Hirsch-Ginberg C, LeMaistre AC, Kantarjian H, Talpaz M, Cork A, Frereich EJ, Trujillo JM, Lee MS, Stass SA: RAS mutations are rare events in Philadelphia chromosome-negative/bcr gene rearrangement-negative chronic myelogenous leukemia, but are prevalent in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood 76:1214, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]

59. Tien H, Wang C-H, Chuang S-M, Chow J-M, Lee F-Y, Liu M-C, Chen Y-C, Shen M-C, Lin D-T, Lin K-H: Cytogenetic studies, ras mutation and clinical characteristics in primary myelodysplastic syndrome. A study of 68 Chinese patients in Taiwan. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 74:40, 1994[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

60. Kalra R, Paderanga DC, Olson K, Shannon KM: Genetic analysis is consistent with the hypothesis that NF1 limits myeloid cell growth through p21ras. Blood 84:3435, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

61. Shannon KM, O'Connell P, Martin G, Paderanga D, Olson K, Dinndorf P, McCormick F: Loss of the normal NF1 allele from the bone marrow of children with type 1 neurofibromatosis and malignant myeloid disorders. N Engl J Med 330:597, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

62. Bollag G, Clapp DW, Shih S, Adler F, Zhang YY, Thompson P, Lange B, Freedman M, McCormick F, Jacks T, Shannon K: Loss of NF1 results in activation of the Ras signaling pathway and leads to aberrant growth in haematopoietic cells. Nat Genet 12:144, 1996[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

63. Largaespada DA, Brannan CI, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG: NF1 deficiency causes Ras-mediated granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor hypersensitivity and chronic myeloid leukemia. Nat Genet 12:137, 1996[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

64. Jack T, Shih S, Schmitt EM, Bronson RT, Bernards A, Weinberg RA: Tumorigenic and development consequences of a targeted nf1 in the mouse. Nat Genet 7:353, 1994[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

65. Quelle FW, Sato N, Witthuhun BA, Inhorn RC, Eder M, Miyajima A, Griffin JD, Ihle JN: JAK2 associates with the beta chain of the receptor for granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, and its activation requires the membrane-proximal region. Mol Cell Biol 14:4335, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

66. Schirò R, Longoni D, Rossi V, Maglia O, Doni A, Arsura M, Carrara G, Masera G, Vannier O, Dinarello CA, Biondi A: Suppression of juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia colony growth factor by interleukin-1 receptor antagonist. Blood 83:460, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

67. Papayannopolou T, Nakamoto B, Anagnou NP, Chui D, Dow L, Sanders J: Expression of embryonic globins by erythroid cells in juvenile chronic myelocytic leukemia. Blood 77:2569, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]

68. Privitera E, Schirò R, Longoni D, Ronchi A, Rambaldi A, Bernasconi S, Ottolenghi S, Masera G, Biondi A: Constitutive expression of GATA-1, EPOR, alfa-globin, and gamma-globin genes in myeloid clonogenic cells from juvenile chronic myelocytic leukemia. Blood 86:323, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

69. Miles DK, Feedman MH, Stephens K, Pallavicini M, Sievers EL, Weaver M, Grunberger T, Thompson P, Shannon KM: Pattern of hematopoietic lineage involvement in children with neurofibromatosis, type 1 and malignant myeloid disorders. Blood 88:4314, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

70. Fialkow PJ, Denman AM, Jacobson RJ, Lowenthal MN: Chronic myelocytic leukemia: Origin of some lymphocytes from leukemic stem cells. J Clin Invest 62:815, 1978

71. Lapidot T, Gruneberger T, Vormoor J, Estrov Z, Kollet O, Bunin N, Zaizov R, Williams DE, Freedman MH: Identification of human juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemic stem cells capable of initiating the disease in primary and secondary SCID mice. Blood 88:2655, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

72. Hutter SJ, Hecht F, Kaiser-McCaw B, Hays T, Baranko P, Cohen J, Durie B: Bone marrow monosomy 7: Hematologic and clinical manifestations in childhood and adolescence. Hematol Oncol 2:5, 1984[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

73. Freedman M, Estrov Z, Chan E: Juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia. Am J Ped Hematol Oncol 10:261, 1988[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

74. Gadner H, Haas OA: Experience in pediatric myelodysplastic syndromes. Hematol Oncol North Am 6:655, 1992[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

75. Luna-Finemann S, Shannon K, Ortega J, Steinharz P, Davis J, Sanders J, Masterson M, Lange BJ: De novo childhood preleukemic conditions: Preliminary data from a retrospective study of 172 cases. Blood 86:51a, 1995

76. Butcher M, Frenck R, Emperor J, Paderanga D, Maybee D, Shannon K: Molecular evidence that childhood monosomy 7 syndrome is distinct from juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia and other childhood myeloproliferative disorders. Genes Chromosom Cancer 12:50, 1995[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

77. Le Beau MM, Larson RA, Green ED, Shannon KM: Analysis of juvenile c