Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maaskant-van Wijk, P.A.
Right arrow Articles by Kr. von dem Borne, A.E.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maaskant-van Wijk, P.A.
Right arrow Articles by Kr. von dem Borne, A.E.G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, Vol. 90 No. 4 (August 15), 1997: pp. 1709b-1711

CORRESPONDENCE

Evidence That the RHDVI Deletion Genotype Does Not Exist

    LETTER

To the Editor:

The Rhesus (RH) blood group system, one of the most complex polymorphic systems in humans, encompasses at least 45 antigens. These antigens are carried by at least two red blood cell membrane proteins that are encoded by two homologous genes, RHD and RHCE.1 The RHD antigen is a mosaic structure of at least 37 epitopes. Rearrangements of the RHD gene with the RHCE gene or point mutations in the RHD gene result in the loss of one or more D epitopes. Individuals with partial D phenotypes can produce antibodies to the missing epitopes in response to transfusion with D-positive blood or by pregnancy with a D-positive fetus. Until now, the following partial D phenotypes have been described: DII, DIIIa, DIIIb, DIIIc, DIVa, DIVb, DVa, DVI, DVII, DDFR, DDBT, DDNU, DHMi, DHMii, and RoHar.2

Of the partial DVI phenotype, the partial D category that is most frequently leading to alloimmunization, two genotypes have been described3: the conversion type and the deletion type. In the conversion type, exons 4, 5, and 6 of the RHD gene are replaced by RHCE equivalents occurring in individuals of the DVI Ccee phenotype. Individuals of the DVIccEe phenotype were originally described as belonging to the deletion type in which exons 4, 5, and 6 of the RHD gene are lost. Recent evidence suggests that these two types can also be distinguished at the serologic level using anti-BARC serum4 or several monoclonal antibodies (IgG MoAbs NOI, SAL17-4E8, BRAD-3 and IgM MoAb CA27-4C5, all distributed via the Third International Workshop on Monoclonal Antibodies5 ).

In contrast to our previous results,3 we show now that exon replacement is involved in both DVI genotypes. In the present study, 12 individuals of the DVI phenotype were analyzed: 9 individuals of the DVICcee phenotype and 3 individuals of the DVIccEe phenotype, including the 2 individuals (307 and DEL) who were described as having the deletion type of DVI.3

Standard RHD genotyping6 suggested the absence of RHD exon 4 and RHD intron 4 and the presence of RHD exon 7 and RHD 3'-noncoding region in all DVI individuals. In addition, six exon-specific primer sets amplifying RHD exons 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 were developed. From DNA of 3 individuals of the DVICe haplotype, RHD exons 3, 7, and 9 could be amplified, whereas exons 4, 5, and 6 could not. This is in agreement with the DVI exon 4/5/6 conversion genotype. From the DNA of 2 individuals of the DVIcE haplotype, RHD exons 3, 6, 7, and 9 could be amplified, whereas exons 4 and 5 could not. Furthermore, in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) experiments that were performed on the reticulocyte transcripts from the DVI variants previously described,3 we amplified hybrid D(exon 3)-CE(exon 4) fragments from both DVIccEe and DVICcee samples and a hybrid CE(exon 5)-D(exon 6) fragment only from the DVIccEe sample (Fig 1). From genomic DNA, a hybrid CE(exon 6)-D(exon 7) fragment could only be amplified from DVICcee samples.7 As expected, no amplification product was obtained with control dccee and DccEE samples.


View larger version (K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Hybrid D-CE and CE-D PCR of reticulocyte transcripts from DVI phenotype individuals. cDNAs derived from reticulocytes of donors with the indicated phenotypes were amplified between two sets of primers in which one oligonucleotide is specific of the RHD gene and the other one of the RHCE gene. Set 1: 5'TTTGTCGGTGCTGATCTCAGTGGA3' (RHD, exon 3); 5'GAACACGTAGAAGTGCCTCAG3' (RHCE, exon 4). Set 2: 5'GGATGTTCTGGCCAAGTG3' (RHCE, exon 5); 5'AGGTACTTGGCTCCCCCGGAC3' (RHD, exon 6). PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis on 2.5% agarose gel and characterized by hybridization with the Rh cDNA probe.

Together with the sequence analysis of full-length RHD cDNA of individual 307, previously described as having the DVI deletion genotype,3 these results showed replacement of RHD exons 4 and 5 by their equivalent exons from the RHCE gene and not the deletion of exons 4, 5, and 6 in variants with the DVIcE haplotype.

The different conclusions from our previous published results could be explained by (1) the comigration of the rearranged CE(exon 4-5)-D(exon 6) BamHI genomic fragment with the restriction fragment of 5.3 kb carrying exons 4, 5, and 6 of the RHCE gene, which resulted in a higher intensity of this band in the DVIccEe (DEL and 307) as compared with the other DVICcee samples and D controls; and (2) the fact that the original sequence analysis of the DVI DEL transcripts was most likely performed on a splice variant of the Rh transcripts lacking exon 4-5-6.

Western blot analysis performed with a monoclonal antibody recognizing a nonconformation epitope of the RhD antigen8 showed a 30- to 34-kD RhD polypeptide in the red blood cell membrane of DVIccEe (DEL and 307) and DVICcee (861 and BOU) variants, as in control DccEE samples (Fig 2). These results provided the definitive proof that the variant phenotypes of the DVIccEe samples previously investigated3 did not result from the expression of a deleted isoform of the RhD polypeptide.


View larger version (K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Western blot analysis of RhD proteins from red blood cells of different DVI and common Rh phenotypes. Total membrane proteins from red blood cells of different DVI (DVI ccEe and DVI Ccee) and common (dccee and DccEE) Rh phenotypes were separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (12.5%) in nonreducing conditions, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (0.45 mm; Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany), and immunostained with LOR-15C9 monoclonal antibody.8 Immunoblots were finally stained with antihuman IgG peroxidase-tagged antibodies (Biosys, Compiegne, France) and the peroxidase activity was shown by the ECL chemoluminescence system from Amersham (Bucks, UK).

In conclusion, our results show that the DVI deletion genotype does not exist. In the conversion type described before, exons 4, 5, and 6 of the RHD gene are replaced by RHCE equivalents occurring in individuals of the DVICcee phenotype. Individuals of the DVIccEe phenotype have the newly described conversion type in which RHD exons 4 and 5 are replaced by RHCE equivalents. Our results confirm the recent analysis of unrelated DVIccEe samples performed by Avent et al9 and Huang.10 Based on the serologic heterogeneity among DVI variants, it may be possible that, in the future, more rare DVI genotypes will be described.

P.A. Maaskant-van Wijk
E.A.M. Beckers
D.J. van Rhenen
Red Cross Bloodbank
Rotterdam, The Netherlands

I. Mouro
Y. Colin
J.P. Cartron
INSERM
Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine
Paris, France

B.H.W. Faas
C.E. van der Schoot
Central Laboratory of the Netherlands Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service and Laboratory of
Experimental and Clinical Immunology
Amsterdam, The Netherlands

P.A. Apoil
A. Blancher
Laboratoire d'Immunologie
Hôpital Purpan
Toulouse, France

A.E.G. Kr. von dem Borne
Academic Medical Center
Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  

    REFERENCES

1. Smythe JS, Avent ND, Judson PA, Parsons SF, Martin PG, Anstee DJ: Expression of RHD and RHCE gene products using retroviral transduction of K562 cells establishes the molecular basis of Rh blood group antigens. Blood 87:2968, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Cartron JP, Rouillac C, Le Van Kim C, Mouro I, Colin Y: Tentative model for the mapping of D epitopes on the RhD polypeptide. Transfus Clin Biol 6:497, 1996

3. Mouro I, Le Van Kim C, van Rhenen DJ, Le Pennec PY, Bailly P, Cartron JP, Colin Y: Rearrangements of the blood group RhD gene associated with the DVI category phenotype. Blood 83:1129, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Daniels G: Human Blood Groups. Oxford, UK, Blackwell Science, 1995

5. van Rhenen DJ, Vermeij J, Ligthart P, Overbeeke MAM: Serological differences between partial D VI of the deletion type and partial D VI of the conversion type. Transfus Clin Biol 3:17s, 1996

6. Simsek S, Faas BHW, Bleeker PMM, Overbeeke MAM, Cuijpers HThM, van der Schoot CE, von dem Borne AEGKr: Rapid Rh D genotyping by polymerase chain reaction-based amplification of DNA. Blood 85:2975, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Maaskant-van Wijk PA, Faas BHW, Beckers EAM, Wildoer P, Ligthart PC, Overbeeke MAM, von dem Borne AEGKr, van Rhenen DJ, van der Schoot CE: PCR-based genotyping of partial D category VI conversion type. Transfus Clin Biol 3:32s, 1996

8. Apoil PA, Reid ME, Halverson G, Mouro I, Colin Y, Roubinet F, Cartron JP, Blancher A: A human monoclonal anti-D antibody detecting by immunoblotting a non conformation dependent epitope on the RhD protein. Br J Haematol (submitted)

9. Avent ND, Liu W, Jones JW, Scott ML, Voak D, Pisacka M, Watt J, Fletcher A: Molecular analysis of Rh transcripts and polypeptides from individuals expressing the DVI variant phenotype: An RHD gene deletion event does not generate all DVIccEe phenotypes. Blood 89:1779, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Huang CH: Human DVI category erythrocytes: Correlation of the phenotype with a novel hybrid RhD-CE-D gene but not an internally deleted RhD gene. Blood 89:1834, 1997[Free Full Text]


© 1997 by The American Society of Hematology.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maaskant-van Wijk, P.A.
Right arrow Articles by Kr. von dem Borne, A.E.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maaskant-van Wijk, P.A.
Right arrow Articles by Kr. von dem Borne, A.E.G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
Sponsor: Genentech BioOncology and and Biogen Idec
Blood Online is supported in part by
Genentech BioOncology and Biogen Idec
  Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020