| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Blood, Vol. 91 No. 10 (May 15), 1998:
pp. 3901-3908
By
From the Department of Pathology, Centre Médical Universitaire,
Geneva, Switzerland.
CD44 is the major cell surface receptor for the extracellular matrix
glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan and is implicated in a variety of
biological events that include embryonic morphogenesis, lymphocyte recirculation, inflammation, and tumor metastasis. CD44 delivers activation signals to T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, natural killer cells, polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and macrophages by stimulating protein tyrosine phosphorylation and calcium influx. The mechanism of
signal transduction via CD44 remains undefined, although CD44 was shown
to physically associate with intracellular protein tyrosine kinase Lck
in T lymphocytes. In the present report, we show that a significant
proportion of CD44 in human peripheral blood T lymphocytes and
endothelial cells is associated with low-density plasma membrane fractions that represent specialized plasma membrane domains enriched in glycosphingolipids and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins. CD44 and the GPI-anchored CD59 do not appear to directly interact in the low-density membrane fractions. In human peripheral blood T lymphocytes, 20% to 30% of the Src family protein tyrosine kinases, Lck and Fyn, are recovered from these fractions.
CD44-associated protein kinase activity was selectively recovered from
the low-density membrane fractions, corresponding to
glycosphingolipid-rich plasma membrane microdomains. Reprecipitation of
the in vitro phosphorylated proteins showed that CD44 associates not
only with Lck but also with Fyn kinase in these membrane domains. Our
results suggest that cellular stimulation via CD44 may proceed through
the signaling machinery of glycosphingolipid-enriched plasma membrane
microdomains and, hence, depend on the functional integrity of such
domains.
CD44 IS A TYPE I transmembrane
glycoprotein expressed in a variety of cell types, including
lymphocytes, macrophages, erythrocytes, fibroblasts, epithelial cells,
and endothelial cells.1 Although CD44 is encoded by a
single gene, alternative RNA splicing gives rise to a large number of
isoforms with distinct cellular distribution patterns.
Posttranslational addition of N- and O-glycans and chondroitin/heparan sulfate moieties make CD44 a highly heterogeneous molecule.
Furthermore, expression of certain defined isoforms is associated with
specific cellular behavior.2 CD44 is a major receptor for
the extracellular glycosaminoglycan hyaluronic acid (HA).3
Interaction with HA underlies a wide spectrum of CD44 functions in
embryonic morphogenesis and organogenesis, lymphocyte homing,
hematopoiesis, cellular activation, and tumor
progression.1,4-6
Signaling via CD44 has been well documented using anti-CD44 monoclonal
antibody (MoAb) as well as its natural ligand. Specific anti-CD44 MoAb
induces T lymphocytes to secrete interleukin-2 and proliferate, both
directly and in response to suboptimal doses of mitogenic anti-CD3 or
anti-CD2 pairs7-12; stimulates cytotoxic effector functions
in cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and polymorphonulear leukocytes
(PMNs)12-14; and augments natural killer (NK)
cell cytotoxicity15-17 and macrophage proinflammatory
cytokine secretion.18 Similarly, HA binding to
CD44 stimulates T lymphocytes19,20 and
macrophages.21-24 In B cells, both anti-CD44 MoAb and HA
stimulate proliferation and differentiation into antibody-producing
cells.25 Marked differences were shown in the ability of
cell surface CD44 to bind HA and in the capacity of anti-CD44 MoAbs to
stimulate target cells.1 Recent studies have shown that HA
fragments, but not polymeric HA, activate macrophages via
CD44.23,24 HA fragments are generated by activated
leukocytes in chronic inflammatory lesions26,27 that might
lead to further recruitment of leukocytes. CD44-HA interaction
contributes directly to tumor development,28 and elevated
hyaluronidase production by tumors generates HA fragments that promote
neoangiogenesis.29
Despite the well-documented signaling capacity of CD44, the mechanism
of signal transduction via CD44 remains poorly understood. The recent
demonstration that CD44 coprecipitates Lck in human T
lymphocytes30 provides one important link in the CD44
signaling pathway. A significant proportion of CD44 resists
solubilization in nonionic detergents,31 and recent
investigations have shown that CD44 molecules lacking the cytoplasmic
tail are still detergent-insoluble, possibly because of their
association with Triton X-100 (TX-100)-insoluble lipids.31,32 This behavior is similar to that of most
glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored
glycoproteins,33 which are confined to the external leaflet
of the plasma membrane. Because many GPI-anchored molecules transduce
signals34 and associate with Src family PTKs in specialized plasma membrane domains,35,36 we investigated whether CD44 also shares this property. Our results show that only the CD44 molecules present in glycosphingolipid (GSL)-rich low-density membrane
domains associate with active Lck as well as Fyn kinases.
Reagents and antibodies.
TX-100 was from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Brij-58 (polyoxyethylene 20 cetyl ether) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated cholera toxin
were from Sigma Chemie (Buchs, Switzerland). Protease inhibitors
aprotinin, leupeptin, Pefabloc SC, biotin-X-NHS ester, and
octylglucoside (OTG) were from Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany).
HRP-conjugated streptavidin and the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL)
reagent were from Amersham (Buckinghamshire, UK). Mouse MoAb against human CD2 (MEM-65), CD44 (MEM-85), CD45 (MEM-28), CD59
(MEM-43), and major histocompatibility antigen I (MHC-I; MEM-147) were
kind gifts from Dr Vaclav Horejsi (Institute of Molecular Genetics,
Prague, Czech Republic). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against Lck and
Fyn kinases, HRP-conjugated goat antimouse and goat antirabbit IgG and
protein A/G immunoprecipitation beads were from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology Inc (Santa Cruz, CA). Rabbit polyclonal antibody against
caveolin and antiphosphotyrosine MoAb PY20 were from Transduction Labs
(Lexington, KY). Alkaline phosphatase (AP)-conjugated goat antimouse
IgG was from PharMingen (San Diego, CA). BCA protein quantitation kit
and AP-ECL detection kit were from Bio-Rad (Richmond, CA).
Distribution of cellular proteins and GM1 ganglioside in equilibrium
density gradients.
Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from
buffy coats. One hundred million PBMC or PHA blasts were washed in TKM
buffer (50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 25 mmol/L KCl, 5 mmol/L
MgCl2, and 1 mmol/L EGTA) and lysed in 0.750 mL of lysis buffer (TKM buffer containing 0.5% TX-100 or 0.5% Brij-58 and the
protease inhibitors leupeptin [1 µmol/L], aprotinin [2 µg/mL], and Pefabloc SC [2 mmol/L] and 100 µmol/L sodium orthovanadate) for
30 minutes on ice. After adding sucrose to 40%, the lysate was placed
at the bottom of a SW41 tube, overlaid with 6.0 mL of 36% sucrose
followed by 3.5 mL of 5% sucrose in TKM buffer, and centrifuged at
250,000g for 16 to 20 hours at 4°C. Eleven 1-mL fractions
(excluding the pellet) were collected from the top and stored at
Cell surface biotinylation and immunoprecipitation.
Confluent cultures of ECV304 cells were biotinylated with 50 µg/mL
Biotin-X-NHS ester in 5 mL of biotinylation buffer (10 mmol/L sodium
borate buffer, pH 8.9) at room temperature for 15 minutes, washed in
TKM buffer, and lysed in 0.750 mL of lysis buffer containing 0.5%
TX-100. After equilibrium gradient centrifugation, low-density
fractions (3 through 6, that correspond to the 5% to 36% sucrose
interface; Fig 1) were pooled. One
milliliter of the pool, precleared with Pansorbin (Calbiochem, San
Diego, CA), was added to protein A/G beads coated with MoAb against
CD44 or CD59. After incubation at 4°C for 2 hours, the beads were
washed in lysis buffer and proteins eluted by boiling in reducing
sample buffer were detected by Western blot using streptavidin-HRP and ECL reagent.
Cell stimulation via CD44.
Twenty-four-well Falcon microtiter plates were coated with 50 µg/mL
anti-CD44 MoAb (MEM-85) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 2 hours
at 37°C. Freshly isolated PBMC from healthy volunteers were
suspended in RPMI at 2 × 106/mL and equilibrated to
37°C, and 1 mL was added to the wells. At the indicated time
points, cells were pelleted down in a microfuge. The cell pellet and
cells adhering to the plate were lysed in 100 µL of boiling sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS) lysis buffer (10 mmol/L Tris pH 7.4, 1% SDS, 100 µmol/L sodium orthovanadate), pooled, and sonicated briefly. Aliquots
of the lysates were analyzed for phosphotyrosylated proteins or the
kinases by Western blot.
Immune complex kinase assays.
Twenty-five microliters of protein A/G plus beads was incubated with 5 µg of the indicated antibodies in 500 µL PBS for 30 minutes at
4°C and FCS was added to 0.5% (to minimize nonspecific background). This mixture was incubated for a further 30 minutes and
pelleted down. For immunoprecipitation from the total cell lysates, 10 ×106 PBMC were lysed in 1 mL of lysis
buffer containing 0.5% Brij-58 and the nuclei were removed by
centrifugation. One milliliter of total lysate or pooled floating
membrane fractions (3 through 6) or the bottom fractions (9 through 11)
from the equilibrium gradients of Brij-58 lysate were precleared with
Pansorbin and added to Ab-coated protein A/G beads. After incubation at
4°C for 2 to 4 hours on a rotating wheel, the beads were washed
twice in TKM-0.5% Brij-58, washed once in kinase buffer (20 mmol/L
MOPS, pH 7.4, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, 5 mmol/L MnCl2,
100 µmol/L sodium orthovanadate), and finally suspended in 25 µL of
kinase buffer. Kinase reaction was initiated by the addition of 2 µCi
of [ Solubility of CD44 in non-ionic detergents has been reported to be cell
type specific.31 Whereas a significant fraction of CD44 in
fibroblasts was detergent-insoluble, lymphocyte and epithelial CD44
were completely solubilized in TX-100. In fibroblasts, only the
detergent-insoluble fraction of CD44 floated up to the low-density
fractions in equilibrium density gradients.32 However, when
we analyzed the flotation properties of different cell surface molecules with GPI or polypeptide membrane anchor in human peripheral blood T lymphocytes lysed in 0.5% TX-100, we observed that 20% to
30% of the extracted CD44 floated up to the low-density fractions at
the 5% to 36% sucrose interface (Fig 1). All CD44 was extracted under
these conditions (data not shown). Almost all of the GPI-anchored CD59
(Fig 1) and more than 60% of the cholera toxin binding GM1 ganglioside
(Fig 2A) were recovered from the floating
fractions 3 through 6, which also contained small amounts of MHC-I and
CD45 (Fig 1). Similar results were obtained with PHA blasts (Fig 1, right panel; and Fig 2A). Protein estimation by BCA method showed that
the floating low-density fractions (3 through 6) contained less than
20% of the total cellular proteins extracted, and the bulk remained at
the bottom of the gradient; the total protein profile across the
gradient is shown in Fig 2B.
CD44 transduces activation signals in T lymphocytes, CTLs, PMNs, NK
cells, B lymphocytes, and macrophages,7-25 but how exactly these signals are transduced across the plasma membrane remains poorly
understood. MoAb-induced CD44 cross-linking increases protein tyrosine
phosphorylation, calcium influx, and gene activation in target
cells.10,12,22,43 Interaction of CD44 with cytoskeletal networks and GTP,47 intracellular PTK Lck,30
and p185 HER2 transmembrane oncoprotein with PTK activity48
have been implicated as transmembrane signaling mechanisms. In the
present report, we show that (1) only a small proportion of all CD44
receptors associates with Lck, (2) this interaction occurs in
specialized plasma membrane microdomains, and (3) in addition to Lck,
Fyn is also recovered in association with CD44 from these membrane domains. These membrane domains, enriched in GSLs and GPI-anchored glycoproteins, also harbor a number of other signaling molecules and
thus represent privileged signaling sites in the plasma
membrane.39
Submitted June 30, 1997;
accepted January 12, 1998.
The authors thank Dr Vaclav Horejsi for his generous gift of
antibodies.
1.
Lesley J,
Hyman R,
Kincade PW:
CD44 and its interactions with extracellular matrix.
Adv Immunol
54:271,
1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Herrlich P,
Zoller M,
Pals ST,
Ponta H:
CD44 splice variants: Metastases meet lymphocytes.
Immunol Today
14:395,
1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Aruffo A,
Stamenkovic I,
Melnick M,
Underhill CB,
Seed B:
CD44 is the principal cell surface receptor for hyaluronate.
Cell
61:1303,
1990[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Haynes BF,
Telen MJ,
Hale LP,
Denning SM:
CD44
5.
Underhill C:
CD44: The hyaluronan receptor.
J Cell Sci
103:293,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Aruffo A:
CD44: One ligand, two functions.
J Clin Invest
98:2191,
1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Huet S,
Groux H,
Caillou B,
Valentin H,
Prieur A-M,
Bernard A:
CD44 contributes to T cell activation.
J Immunol
143:798,
1989[Abstract]
8.
Simizu Y,
van Seventer GA,
Siringanian R,
Wahl L,
Shaw S:
Dual role of CD44 molecule in T cell adhesion and activation.
J Immunol
143:2457,
1989[Abstract]
9.
Denning SM,
Le PT,
Singer KH,
Haynes BF:
Antibodies against the CD44 p80 lymphocyte homing receptor molecule augment human peripheral blood T cell activation.
J Immunol
144:7,
1990[Abstract]
10.
Conrad P,
Rothman BL,
Kelly KA,
Blue M-L:
Mechanism of peripheral T cell activation by coengagement of CD44 and CD2.
J Immunol
149:1833,
1992[Abstract]
11.
Pierres A,
Lipcey C,
Mawas C,
Olive D:
A unique monoclonal antibody identifies a new T cell activation pathway.
Eur J Immunol
22:413,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Galandrini R,
Albi N,
Tripodi G,
Zarcone D,
Terenzi A,
Moretta A,
Grossi CE,
Velardi A:
Antibodies to CD44 trigger effector functions of human T cell clones.
J Immunol
150:4225,
1993[Abstract]
13.
Seth A,
Gote L,
Nagarkatti M,
Nagarkatti PS:
T-cell-receptor-independent activation of cytolytic activity of cytotoxic T lymphocytes mediated through CD44 and gp90MEL-14.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
88:7877,
1991
14.
Pericle F,
Sconocchia G,
Titus JA,
Segal DM:
CD44 is a cytotoxic triggering molecule on human polymorphonuclear cells.
J Immunol
157:4657,
1996[Abstract]
15.
Tan PHS,
Santos EB,
Rossbach H-C,
Sandmaier BM:
Enhancement of natural killer activity by an antibody to CD44.
J Immunol
150:812,
1993[Abstract]
16.
Sconocchia G,
Titus JA,
Segal DM:
CD44 is a cytotoxic triggering molecule in human peripheral blood NK cells.
J Immunol
153:5473,
1994[Abstract]
17.
Galandrini R,
De Maria R,
Piccoli M,
Frati L,
Santoni A:
CD44 triggering enhances human NK cell cytotoxic functions.
J Immunol
153:4399,
1994[Abstract]
18.
Webb DSA,
Shimizu Y,
van Seventer GA,
Shaw S,
Gerrard TL:
LFA-3, CD44, and CD45: Physiologic triggers of human monocyte TNF and IL-1 release.
Science
249:1295,
1990
19.
Bourguignon LYW,
Lokeshwar VB,
Chen X,
Kerrick WG:
Hyaluronic acid-induced lymphocyte signal transduction and HA receptor (GP85/CD44)-cytoskeleton interaction.
J Immunol
151:6634,
1993[Abstract]
20.
Galandrini R,
Galluzzo E,
Albi N,
Grossi CE,
Velardi A:
Hyaluronate is costimulatory for human T cell effector functions and binds to CD44 on activated T cells.
J Immunol
153:21,
1994[Abstract]
21.
Noble P,
Lake F,
Henson P,
Riches D:
Hyaluronate activation of CD44 induces insulin-like growth factor expression by a tumor necrosis factor-
22.
Noble PW,
McKee CM,
Cowman M,
Shin HS:
Hyaluronan fragments activate an NF-
23.
McKee CM,
Penno MB,
Cowman M,
Burdick MD,
Strieter RM,
Bao C,
Noble PW:
Hyaluronan (HA) fragments induce chemokine gene expression in alveolar macrophages
24.
McKee CM,
Lowenstein CJ,
Horton MR,
Wu J,
Bao C,
Chin BY,
Choi AMK,
Noble PW:
Hyaluronan fragments induce nitric-oxide synthase in murine macrophages through nuclear factor
25.
Rafi A,
Nagarkatti M,
Nagarkatti PS:
Hyaluronate-CD44 interactions can induce murine B-cell activation.
Blood
89:2901,
1997
26.
Bjermer L,
Lundgren R,
Hallgren R:
Hyaluronan and type III procollagen peptide concentrations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
Thorax
44:126,
1989[Abstract]
27. Poole A, Dieppe P: Biological markers in rheumatoid arthritis.
Semin Arthritis Rheum 23S:17, 1994
28.
Bartolazzi A,
Peach R,
Aruffo A,
Stamenkovic I:
Interaction between CD44 and hyaluronate is directly implicated in the regulation of tumor development.
J Exp Med
180:53,
1994
29.
West DC,
Hampson IN,
Arnold F,
Kumar S:
Angiogenesis induced by degradation products of hyaluronic acid.
Science
228:1324,
1985
30.
Taher TE,
Smit L,
Griffioen AW,
Schilder Tol EJ,
Borst J,
Pals ST:
Signaling through CD44 is mediated by tyrosine kinases. Association with p56lck in T lymphocytes.
J Biol Chem
271:2863,
1996
31.
Neame SJ,
Uff CR,
Sheikh H,
Wheatley SC,
Isacke CM:
CD44 exhibits a cell type dependent interaction with triton X-100 insoluble, lipid rich, plasma membrane domains.
J Cell Sci
108:3127,
1995[Abstract]
32.
Perschl A,
Lesley J,
English N,
Hyman R,
Trowbridge IS:
Transmembrane domain of CD44 is required for its detergent insolubility in fibroblasts.
J Cell Sci
108:1033,
1995[Abstract]
33.
Low MG:
The glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchor of membrane proteins.
Biochim Biophys Acta
988:427,
1989[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Robinson PJ:
Phosphatidylinositol membrane anchors and T-cell activation.
Immunol Today
12:35,
1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Stefanova I,
Horejsi V,
Ansotegui IJ,
Knapp W,
Stockinger H:
GPI-anchored cell-surface molecules complexed to protein tyrosine kinases.
Science
254:1016,
1991
36.
Brown DA:
The tyrosine kinase connection: How GPI-anchored proteins activate T cells.
Curr Opin Immunol
5:349,
1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Ilangumaran S,
Briol A,
Hoessli DC:
Distinct interactions among GPI-anchored, transmembrane and membrane associated intracellular proteins, and sphingolipids in lymphocyte and endothelial cell plasma membranes.
Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembranes
1328:227,
1997 [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Lisanti MP,
Scherer PE,
Vidugiriene J,
Tang ZL,
Hermanowski-Vosatka A,
Tu YH,
Cook RF,
Sargiacomo M:
Characterization of caveolin-rich membrane domains isolated from an endothelial-rich source: Implications for human disease.
J Cell Biol
126:111,
1994
39.
Simons K,
Ikonen E:
Functional membrane rafts in cell membranes.
Nature
387:569,
1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Brown DA,
Rose JK:
Sorting of GPI-anchored proteins to glycolipid-enriched membrane subdomains during transport to the apical cell surface.
Cell
68:533,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Kurzchalia TV,
Hartmann E,
Dupree P:
Guilt by insolubility
42.
Hunter T:
Protein kinases and phosphatases: The Yin and yang of protein phosphorylation and signaling.
Cell
80:225,
1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Galandrini R,
Piccoli M,
Frati L,
Santoni A:
Tyrosine kinase-dependent activation of human NK cell functions upon triggering through CD44 receptor.
Eur J Immunol
26:2807,
1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Ohta S,
Yoshida J,
Iwata H,
Hamaguchi M:
Hyaluronate activates tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins including focal adhesion kinase via CD44 in human glioma cells.
Int J Oncol
10:561,
1997
45.
Schraven B,
Schirren A,
Kirchgessner H,
Siebert B,
Meuer SC:
A CD45/p56lck-associated phosphoproteins (pp29-pp32) undergo alterations in human T-cell activation.
Eur J Immunol
22:1857,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46.
Arni S,
Senaldi G,
Poincelet M,
Hoessli DC:
Selective association of the p59fyn tyrosine kinase with murine T lymphoma membrane phosphoproteins.
Oncogene
8:2485,
1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
47.
Bourguignon LYW:
Interactions between the membrane-cytoskeleton and CD44 during lymphocyte signal transduction and cell adhesion.
Curr Top Membranes
43:293,
1996
48.
Bourguignon LYW,
Zhu H,
Chu A,
Iida N,
Zhang L,
Hung M-C:
Interaction between the adhesion receptor, CD44, and the oncogene product, p185HER2, promotes human ovarian tumor cell activation.
J Biol Chem
272:27913,
1997
49.
Schroeder R,
London E,
Brown DA:
Interactions between saturated acyl chains confer detergent resistance on lipids and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins: GPI-anchored proteins in liposomes and cells show similar behavior.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:12130,
1994
50.
Spiegel S,
Fishman PH,
Weber RJ:
Direct evidence that endogeneous GM1 gangliosides can mediate thymocyte proliferation.
Science
230:1285,
1985
51.
Gouy H,
Debre P,
Bismuth G:
Triggering of a sustained calcium response through a p56lck-dependent pathway by exogenous ganglioside GM1 in human T lymphocytes.
J Immunol
155:5160,
1995[Abstract]
52.
Hakomori S-I,
Igarashi Y:
Gangliosides and glycosphingolipids as modulators of cell growth, adhesion, and transmembrane signalling.
Adv Lipid Res
25:147,
1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
53.
Massague J:
Neurotrophic factors
54.
Bohuslav J,
Horejsi V,
Hansmann C,
Stockl J,
Weidle UH,
Majdic O,
Bartke I,
Knapp W,
Stockinger H:
Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, beta 2-integrins, and Src-kinases within a single receptor complex of human monocytes.
J Exp Med
181:1381,
1995
55.
Petty HR,
Todd RF:
Integrins as promiscuous signal transduction devices.
Immunol Today
17:209,
1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
56.
Lisanti MP,
Scherer PE,
Tang ZL,
Sargiacomo M:
Caveolae, caveolin-rich membrane domains: A signalling hypothesis.
Trends Cell Biol
4:231,
1994 [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
57.
Field KA,
Holowka D,
Baird B:
Fc epsilon RI-mediated recruitment of p53/56(lyn) to detergent-resistant membrane domains accompanies cellular signaling.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:9201,
1995 |