|
|
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Blood, Vol. 91 No. 6 (March 15), 1998:
pp. 1917-1923
The Smad5 Gene Is Involved in the Intracellular Signaling
Pathways That Mediate the Inhibitory Effects of Transforming
Growth Factor- on Human Hematopoiesis
By
Edward Bruno,
Stephen K. Horrigan,
David Van Den Berg,
Elen Rozler,
Priscilla R. Fitting,
Steven T. Moss,
Carol Westbrook, and
Ronald Hoffman
From the Hematology/Oncology Section, Department of Medicine of the
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
 |
ABSTRACT |
Signals from transforming growth factor- (TGF- ), a
bifunctional regulator of the proliferation of hematopoietic progenitor cells, have been recently shown to be transduced by five novel human
genes related to a Drosophila gene termed MAD (mothers against the
decapentaplegic gene). We showed by reverse transcriptase polymerase
chain reaction that the RNA from one homologue gene, Smad5, was present
in the immortalized myeloid leukemia cell lines, KG1 and HL60, in bone
marrow mononuclear and polymorphonuclear cells, as well as in purified
CD34+ bone marrow cells. Therefore, we studied the role
of this gene in the regulation of human hematopoiesis by TGF- .
TGF- 1 and TGF- 2 significantly inhibited myeloid, erythroid,
megakaryocyte, and multilineage colony formation as assayed in
semisolid culture systems. The levels of Smad5 mRNA in
CD34+ cells were decreased by antisense but not sense
oligonucleotides to Smad5. Preincubation of CD34+ marrow
cells with two sense oligonucleotides to Smad5 did not reverse the
inhibitory effects of TGF- on hematopoietic colony formation.
However, preincubation with two antisense oligonucleotides to Smad5
reversed the inhibitory effects of TGF- . These data show that the
Smad5 gene is involved in the signaling pathway by which TGF-
inhibits primitive human hematopoietic progenitor cell proliferation
and that Smad5 antisense oligonucleotides can interrupt this signal.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
THE HUMAN HEMATOPOIETIC system is
regulated by the interaction between the hematopoietic
microenvironment, a complex network composed of stem cells, progenitor
cells, stromal cells, endogenous growth factors, extracellular matrix
proteins, and various exogenous cytokines.1-5 Several
cytokines, which exhibit both in vitro and in vivo effects on
hematopoietic cells, have been shown to be involved in the regulation
of hematopoiesis.6-25 A number of cytokines are known to
promote hematopoietic cell proliferation, whereas other factors have
been shown to actually inhibit this biological process.6-25
Transforming growth factor- (TGF- ) has been shown to exhibit
unique biological properties because it acts as a bifunctional regulator of in vitro hematopoietic progenitor cell proliferation. Several groups have shown that TGF- is a potent inhibitor of myeloid
(CFU-GM), erythroid (BFU-E), megakaryocytic (CFU-MK), and multilineage
(CFU-MIX) progenitor cells.8,26-33 By contrast, Ottmann and
Pelus32 and Jacobsen et al33 have reported that TGF- can also significantly enhance the growth of human CFU-GM stimulated by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF),
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and
interleukin-3 (IL-3). Recently five novel human genes related to a
Drosophila gene termed MAD (mothers against the decapentaplegic gene)
have been identified and shown to transduce intracellular signals
elicited by the interaction of TGF- family members with their
respective receptors.34-37 One of these MAD-homologues
recently designated as Smad5,34 also known as JV5-1 or
MAD5, has been shown to be located on human chromosome 5q31, which has
been proposed to be the site of a tumor suppressor gene in human
myeloid leukemia.38
The above studies showing an involvement of the Smad5 gene with the
signaling pathway regulating the multipotential effects of TGF-
encouraged our laboratory to study this gene to determine if it indeed
plays a significant role in mediating TGF- signaling in primitive
human hematopoietic cells. Antisense oligonucleotides were designed to
a coding region unique to the Smad5 gene and subsequently used to study
the intracellular pathway by which TGF- exerts its inhibitory affect
on human hematopoietic cells in vitro. Our studies indicate that the
inhibitory effect of TGF- on human hematopoietic progenitor cells is
clearly mediated through the Smad5 gene.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bone marrow (BM) aspirate specimens were obtained under local
anesthesia from healthy, hematologically normal volunteer donors. Informed consent was obtained from donors according to guidelines established by the Institutional Review Board of the University of
Illinois at Chicago.
Cell separation.
BM aspirates were diluted 1:1 with Iscove's modified Dulbecco's
medium (IMDM) containing 20 U/mL of preservative-free sodium heparin
(GIBCO-BRL, Grand Island, NY) and layered over an equal volume of
Ficoll-Paque (specific gravity 1.077 g/mL; Pharmacia Biotech,
Piscataway, NJ).2,6-10,17 Density centrifugation was performed at 500g for 25 minutes at 4°C. The interface low
density BM (LDBM) mononuclear cells were collected and washed with IMDM containing no defined growth factors.2,6-10,17
Positive selection of CD34+ BM cells.
Washed LDBM cells were pre-enriched for a CD34+ cell
population using the Miltenyi Magnetic Cell Sorting System (Miltenyi
Biotech, Auburn, CA). Briefly, the CD34+ subpopulation of
LDBM cells were indirectly magnetically labeled using an
hapten-conjugated primary monoclonal antibody (QBEND/10) and an
antihapten antibody coupled to colloidal super-paramagnetic MACS
Microbeads (Miltenyi Biotech). The magnetically labeled
cells are then enriched on positive selection columns. The average
purity of CD34+ BM cells was 85% to 90% (data not shown).
Isolation and detection of Smad5 RNA.
Total RNA was isolated from cells using the guanidine-acid phenol
method (TRIZOL; Life Technologies, Gaithersburg,
MD).39 After isopropanol precipitation, RNA
was resuspended in water and quantified by ultraviolet absorbance. For
isolation of RNA from CD34+ cells, 20 µg glycogen was
added to the initial homogenate as a carrier and
coprecipitant.39
To detect Smad5 mRNA, RNA isolated both from cell lines and normal bone
marrow-derived cells were used in a coupled reverse transcription
polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay (Titan RT-PCR system,
Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) using those oligonucleotides
designed to span the entire coding region of Smad5
(f-TGAGTTACAGGAAGGTCTCCGA, r-TCCAAATTCTTCTCAGGAATAAGACC).34 Approximately 200 ng total RNA was added to a master mix containing 1X
Titan RT-PCR buffer, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L dNTPs, 5 mmol/L DTT, 10 U Rnasin, AMV reverse transcriptase and Expand PCR
enzyme mix, and 0.3 µmol/L of each primer. The samples were incubated
as follows: 50°C for 30 minutes, then cycled 34 times at 94°C
for 30 seconds, 57°C for 30 seconds, and 68°C for 1 minute. Samples were then incubated at 68°C for 7 minutes and loaded onto a
1.5% agarose gel for analysis by EtBr staining.
The presence of Smad5 mRNA in CD34+ BM cells after
treatment with oligonucleotides was assayed by RT-PCR as follows:
Briefly a master mix containing all components except the primers of
the coupled RT-PCR system was assembled as above.38 The
master mix was divided, and oligonucleotides for amplification were
added to 0.3 µmol/L of each aliquot and divided into individual assay tubes. This primer-master mix was then aliquoted into individual assay
tubes. Total RNA from approximately 10,000 cells for experimental samples was added to each tube containing the RT-PCR mix. Using similar
numbers of CD34+ BM cells (10,000), control experiments
determined that at this RNA concentration and cycle number, samples
were still within the exponential phase of amplification and,
therefore, should be representative of the starting amount of
mRNA.38 Samples were amplified and analyzed as above.
Amplification primer sequences were as follows: Smad5,
f-GAAGCTTGCTGGTAATCTTAAGAATTTTC, r-GCTTGTATCCATAGGCTGGGAA; Smad2,
f-CGAAATGCCACGGTAGAAAT, r-CGGCTTCAAAACCCTGATTA; Smad4, f-GTGAAGATCAGGCCACCT, r-TGTCTGAGCATTGTGCATAG; TGF- R1,
f-CTATATCTGCCACAACCGCACTGTC, r-CGCCACTTTCCTCTCCAAACTTCTC;
TGF- R2, f-CTGCAAGATACATGGCTCCA, r-CTCGATCTCTCAACACGTTGTC; and
transferrin receptor (TFR), f-AGCATTTGCAACCTTTT, r-CTCAGAGCGTCGGGATATC (as a nonspecific control).
Sense and antisense oligonucleotide synthesis.
Sense and antisense phosphothioate oligonucleotides overlapping the
translational initiation codon of the Smad5 gene were synthesized
(Research Genetics Inc, Huntsville, AL). Two sense oligonucleotides,
S-1 (5 -GATTTGTGTCAAATGACG-3 ) and S-2
(5 -TGTCAAATGACGTCAATG-3 ) and two antisense
oligonucleotides, AS-1 (5 -CGTCATTTGACACAAATC-3 ) and AS-2
(5 -CATTGACGTCATTTGACA-3 ) were used in the progenitor cell
assays. All oligonucleotides were resuspended in sterile distilled
H2O to a stock concentration of 1,750 µg/mL and diluted in the culture assay to yield a final concentration of 70 µg/mL. Distilled H2O was used as a negative control in all assays
performed.
Progenitor cell assays.
The effects of oligonucleotides to the MAD-homologue, Smad5, on the
ability of TGF- 1 and TGF- 2 to inhibit the proliferation of
multiple classes of hematopoietic progenitor cells (CFU-GM, BFU-E,
CFU-MIX, and CFU-MK) cloned from BM CD34+ cells were
studied. Oligonucleotides were either added directly to cultures
containing CD34+ BM cells plus selected cytokines with or
without the addition of TGF- or CD34+ cells were
preincubated with oligonucleotides according to the method of Methia et
al.40 After pretreatment with oligonucleotides, the cells
were washed with IMDM and cultured in both a standard methylcellulose
assay6,10 and a serum-depleted fibrin-clot culture
system.2,7-9,17,23,24 CFU-GM, BFU-E, and CFU-MIX-derived colony formation in the methylcellulose culture system was stimulated by the addition of erythropoietin (EPO), IL-3, GM-CSF, and
stem cell factor (SCF; kindly provided by Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA)
at plateau level concentrations (100 ng/mL), previously shown to be
capable of stimulating optimal numbers of colonies in vitro. The
proliferation of CFU-MK-derived colonies in the fibrin-clot system was
stimulated by the addition of IL-3 alone.
Immunofluorescent identification of human MK colonies.
10E5 monoclonal mouse IgG2a antibodies recognizing the
human platelet glycoprotein IIb-IIIA complex41 (graciously
provided by Dr Barry S. Coller, Mt Sinai School of Medicine, New
York, NY) were used as immunologic probes for identifying
human CFU-MK-derived colonies.2,7-9,17,23,24
Statistical analysis.
Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM)
obtained from multiple experiments. Statistical significance was
determined using the Student's t-test.
 |
RESULTS |
Because the expression of Smad5 RNA in human hematopoietic tissues was
essential for its possible role in the signaling pathway by which
TGF- affects hematopoietic cells, we first attempted to detect Smad5
RNA in various cell populations. The entire coding region of Smad5 was
amplified by PCR from RNA isolated from two immortalized human myeloid
leukemia cell lines, KG1 and HL-60 as well as from human low and high
density BM and CD34+ BM cells. The amplification product
was subsequently analyzed on an agarose gel. As can be clearly seen in
Fig 1, in all cases, a single band
representing the full length coding region was found in all cell
populations. Smad5 mRNA levels in antisense oligonucleotide-treated CD34+ cells were analyzed to study the effects of the
oligonucleotides on Smad5. Antisense oligonucleotides were carefully
designed to correspond to sequences unique to the Smad5 coding region,
and had no homology with sequences of other Smad family members.
Figure 2 shows a significant reduction in
Smad5 mRNA levels in those CD34+ cells treated for 22 hours
with antisense oligonucleotides. Although samples treated with sense
oligonucleotides or mock-treated controls contained similar amounts of
Smad5 message, samples treated with antisense to Smad5 contained barely
detectable levels of Smad5 mRNA (Fig 2). Transferrin receptor mRNA,
used as a nonspecific control, was unaffected in all samples. To
evaluate the effect of Smad5 antisense oligonucleotides on other
members of the TGF- signaling pathway we also analyzed the mRNA
levels of two Smad family members known to transmit the TGF- signal,
Smad2 and Smad4 (also known as DPC4), and the two TGF- receptor
subunits, TGF- R1 and TGF- R2. No change was found in the levels of
any of these mRNA species.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 1.
Detection of Smad5 mRNA in the immortalized myeloid
leukemia cell lines KG1 and HL-60, as well as low density mononuclear, high density polymorphonuclear and CD34+ selected cells
isolated from normal human BM. The entire coding region of Smad5 was
amplified by PCR from RNA isolated from the various sources and
analyzed on an agarose gel. In all cell populations analyzed, a single
band representing the full length coding region was found.
|
|

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 2.
Analysis of Smad5 mRNA levels in antisense-treated
CD34+ cells. RNA from approximately 10,000 CD34+ BM cells preincubated with antisense
oligonucleotides to the Smad5 gene were analyzed by RT-PCR for the
presence of Smad5, Smad2, Smad4, TGF- receptor subunit 1 (TGF- R1), TGF- receptor subunit 2 (TGF- R2) and TFR (as a
nonspecific control) mRNA. Amplifications were done under identical
conditions and RNA concentrations and represent time points within the
exponential phase of the assay. Samples treated with antisense
oligonucleotides to Smad5 (AS1 and AS2) contain barely detectable or
undetectable levels of Smad5 mRNA, whereas samples treated with sense
oligonucleotides (S1 and S2) or mock-treated samples (control) contain
similar amounts of Smad5 message. The levels of all other mRNA species
were unaffected for all treatments.
|
|
Several isoforms of TGF- have been recently identified. Therefore,
we studied the effects of antisense oligonucleotides to the Smad5
coding sequences on the ability of two forms of TGF- , TGF- 1, and
TGF- 2 to inhibit hematopoietic progenitor cell proliferation. CD34+ BM cells were preincubated with oligonucleotides to
the Smad5 gene using previously reported methods.40
Preincubation of CD34+ BM cells with each of the
oligonucleotides had no significant effect on colony formation when
compared with control values (data not shown). The cells were then
plated in both methylcellulose and fibrin-clot assays in the presence
of TGF- 2. Figure 3 shows that TGF- 2
had a significant inhibitory effect on human hematopoietic colony
formation in vitro as has been reported previously.8,26-32 When TGF- 2 was added to either methylcellulose or fibrin-clot assays
at 5 ng/mL, CFU-GM, BFU-E, CFU-MIX, and CFU-MK-derived colony
formation was significantly reduced (P < .5; Fig 3).
Preincubation of CD34+ BM cells with sense oligonucleotides
to the Smad5 gene maintained the inhibition, whereas preincubation with
antisense oligonucleotides to Smad5 reversed the incubation by TGF- 2
back to control values (Fig 3). The direct addition of either sense or
antisense oligonucleotides to cultures containing TGF- 2 produced
results similar to those studies in which CD34+ cells were
preincubated with the oligonucleotides (data not shown).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 3.
Preincubation of CD34+ cells with antisense
oligonucleotides to the Smad gene reverses the inhibitory effects of
TGF- 2 on human hematopoietic colony formation. CD34+
BM cells were preincubated with oligonucleotides to the Smad5 gene and
plated at a concentration of 2 × 103/mL in the
presence of EPO (5 U/mL), IL-3 (100 ng/mL), GM-CSF (100 ng/mL), and SCF
(100 ng/mL) in a methylcellulose culture assay or at 2 × 104/mL in the presence of IL-3 (100 ng/mL) in a fibrin-clot
assay system. TGF- 2 was added at 5 ng/mL. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of data taken from three separate
experiments performed in duplicate. *P .5 when compared
with control values. Control CFU-GM = 45.0 ± 3.4 colonies, control
BFU-E = 39.8 ± 4.8 colonies, control CFU-MIX = 11.2 ± 1.5 colonies, and control CFU-MK = 27.0 ± 5.2 colonies. ( ) CFU-GM;
( ) CFU-E; ( ) CFU-MIX; ( ) CFU-MK.
|
|
The effects of oligonucleotides to the Smad5 gene on the ability of
TGF- 1 to inhibit hematopoietic progenitor cell proliferation is
shown in Fig 4. TGF- 1 also significantly
inhibited (P < .5) human CFU-GM, BFU-E, CFU-MIX, and
CFU-MK-derived colony formation in vitro (Fig 4). As was seen in Fig 3
with TGF- 2, the inhibitory effect of TGF- 1 was maintained by
preincubation with sense oligonucleotides and reversed when
CD34+ BM cells were preincubated with antisense
oligonucleotides to Smad5 (Fig 4). Although all oligonucleotides used
to preincubate CD34+ cells were at a concentration of 70 µg/mL, preincubation of CD34+ cells with an increased
concentration of oligonucleotides (105 µg/mL) failed to further
reverse the inhibitory effect of either TGF- 1 or TGF- 2 (data not
shown). Again, the direct addition of oligonucleotides to cultures
containing TGF- 1 gave similar results (data not shown).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 4.
Preincubation of CD34+ cells with antisense
oligonucleotides to the Smad5 gene reverses the inhibitory effects of
TGF- 1 on human hematopoietic colony formation. CD34+
BM cells were preincubated with oligonucleotides to the Smad5 gene and
plated at a concentration of 2 × 103/mL in the
presence of EPO (5 U/mL), IL-3 (100 ng/mL), GM-CSF (100 ng/mL), and SCF
(100 ng/mL) in a methylcellulose culture assay or at 2 × 104/mL in the presence of IL-3 (100 ng/mL) in a fibrin-clot
assay system. TGF- 1 was added at 2 ng/mL. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of data taken from three separate
experiments performed in duplicate. * P .5 when compared
with control values. Control CFU-GM = 63.6 ± 8.0 colonies, control
BFU-E = 61.5 ± 8.4 colonies, control CFU-MIX = 21.0 ± 3.6 colonies, and control CFU-MK = 26.0 ± 5.0 colonies. ( ) CFU-GM;
( ) CFU-E; ( ) CFU-MIX; ( ) CFU-MK.
|
|
The reversal of the inhibitory effect of TGF- 1 was inversely
proportional to the concentration of TGF- 1, as shown in
Fig 5. Although TGF- 1 at 5 ng/mL
exhibited a greater degree of inhibition than TGF- 1 at 2 ng/mL, the
antisense oligonucleotides to the Smad5 gene were better able to
reverse the inhibitory effect of TGF- 1 at the lower concentration of
2 ng/mL (Fig 5). The inhibitory effect of TGF- 1 on in vitro human
hematopoietic colony formation was also significantly greater than the
inhibitory effect of TGF- 2, as shown in Fig 6.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 5.
The reversal of the inhibitory effects of TGF- 1 on
hematopoietic colony formation by antisense oligonucleotides to the
Smad5 gene is inversely related to the concentration of TGF- 1.
CD34+ BM cells were preincubated with oligonucleotides to
the Smad5 gene and plated either at 2 × 103/mL in the
presence of EPO (5 U/mL), IL-3 (100 ng/mL), GM-CSF (100 ng/mL), and SCF
(100 ng/mL) in a methylcellulose culture assay or at 2 × 104/mL in the presence of IL-3 (100 ng/mL) in a fibrin-clot
assay system. TGF- 1 was added either at 2 ng/mL or at 5 ng/mL. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of total colony numbers. The
data was taken from three separate studies performed in duplicate. *
P .5 when compared with control values. ( ) TGF- 1 at 2 ng/mL; ( ) TGF- 1 at 5 ng/mL.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 6.
The inhibitory effect of TGF- 1 on hematopoietic colony
formation is more profound than that exhibited by TGF- 2.
CD34+ BM cells were preincubated with oligonucleotides to
the Smad5 gene and plated either at 2 × 103/mL in the
presence of EPO (5 U/mL), IL-3 (100 ng/mL), GM-CSF (100 ng/mL), and SCF
(100 ng/mL) in a methylcellulose culture assay or at 2 × 104/mL in the presence of IL-3 (100 ng/mL) in a fibrin-clot
assay system. TGF- 1 and TGF- 2 were both added at 5 ng/mL. The
results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of total colony numbers. The
data was taken from three separate studies performed in duplicate. *P .5 when compared with control values.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
TGF- is a secretory polypeptide growth factor that is expressed and
released by several different cell types while being stored in human
blood platelets.27,28,42,43 TGF- was originally purified
from human platelets, human placenta, and bovine kidney27 and identified as a disulfide-linked dimer of two usually identical chains of 112 amino acids.27,28,42 However, heterodimers of TGF- isotypes have also been identified.42 TGF- is
recognized as a multifunctional regulator of hematopoietic cellular
activity because of its ability to either stimulate (cells of
mesenchymal origin) or inhibit (cells of epithelial or neuroectodermal
origin) cell proliferation and growth.27,28,42 Although
specific receptors for TGF- are present on almost all mammalian
cells, its effects on hematopoiesis varies depending on the cell type,
growth conditions, the state of cell differentiation, and the presence
of other growth factors.27,28,42
TGF- 1, the originally described isoform of TGF- , is but one
member of a superfamily of regulatory proteins, including the activins,
inhibins, bone morphogenetic proteins, and a number of more closely
related proteins designated TGF- 2, TGF- 3, TGF- 4, and
TGF- 5.43 Although most studies analyzing the effects of TGF- on hematopoiesis used TGF- 1, additional isoforms including TGF- 2 and TGF- 3 have also been reported to exhibit biological activity equivalent to that of TGF- 1.44,45 However, both
Jennings et al46 and Ohta et al47 have reported
that TGF- 1 exhibits a higher potency of biological activity in vitro
than TGF- 2. Therefore, we used both TGF- 1 and TGF- 2 in the
studies described here in this report.
The exact mechanism by which TGF- inhibits human hematopoiesis is
not presently known. The retinoblastoma gene (RB1), a nuclear phosphoprotein, exhibits growth-suppression activity similar to that of
TGF- .48 Using both mink lung epithelial cells and human lung adenocarcinoma cells, several groups have linked the growth inhibition by TGF- to its ability to keep RB1 in its
unphosphorylated, growth-suppressive state.48,49 They show
that RB1 can regulate TGF- gene expression and suggest that both
TGF- and RB1 function together in a common growth inhibitory
pathway.48,49
The signaling pathway that regulates the multipotential effects of
TGF- is only partially understood. Although the cellular effects of
TGF- are known to be mediated by transmembrane receptors with
cytoplasmic serine-threonine kinase activity, most other components of
the TGF- signaling pathway, including the targets of receptor kinase
activity and components of the signal transduction pathway, remain
unknown.36,50 However, recently several groups have linked
the transduction of signals from TGF- family members to five novel
human genes.34-37 These genes are related to a Drosophila gene called MAD and apparently function downstream of the TGF- receptors.34 Two MAD-homologues, Smad4 (DPC4)51
and Smad2 (JV18-1),34 have recently been shown to be
present on chromosome 18q21.1 as candidate tumor suppressor genes whose
inactivation may lead to pancreatic, colon, and other human cancers.
Smad5 is another MAD-homologue gene bound on human chromosome
5q31,38 the site of a putative tumor suppressor gene in
acute myeloid leukemia. Therefore, we studied the involvement of this
gene in the signaling pathway by which TGF- is able to exert an
inhibitory effect on human hematopoiesis in vitro. Smad5 RNA was shown
by reverse transcriptase PCR to be present in two immortalized human myeloid leukemia cell lines, KG1 and HL60, in human BM mononuclear and
polymorphonuclear cells, as well as in human BM cells positively selected for the CD34 antigen. CD34+ cells, which are
enriched for human hematopoietic progenitor cells, were incubated with
sense and antisense oligonucleotides designed to a unique Smad5 region
encompassing the translational start site. The level of Smad5 mRNA was
significantly decreased by antisense oligonucleotides to Smad5, whereas
sense oligonucleotides or control treated samples contained similar
amounts of mRNA. These antisense oligonucleotides to Smad5 had no
effect on the mRNA levels of Smad2, Smad4, TGF- R1, or TGF- R2
suggesting that the other components of the TGF- signaling pathway
are intact. The effects of these oligonucleotides on the ability of
both TGF- 1 and TGF- 2 to inhibit human hematopoietic colony
formation was studied in vitro. As was previously
reported,8,26-32 TGF- 1 and TGF- 2 both significantly
inhibited CFU-GM, BFU-E, CFU-MK, and CFU-MIX-derived colony formation.
TGF- 1 exhibited a greater degree of inhibition than TGF- 2, as
also reported by different laboratories.46,47 Preincubation
of human CD34+ adult bone marrow (ABM) cells
with two sense oligonucleotides to the Smad5 gene maintained the
inhibitory effect of TGF- 1 and TGF- 2. However, preincubation of
ABM CD34+ cells with antisense oligonucleotides to Smad5
reversed the inhibitory effects of TGF- 1 and TGF- 2, allowing
colony numbers to return to control values. Although TGF- 1 exerted a
higher degree of inhibition than TGF- 2, the reversal of TGF- 1
inhibition by antisense oligonucleotides was significantly less. In
addition, the reversal of the inhibitory effect of TGF- 1 by the
antisense oligonucleotides was inversely proportional to the
concentration of TGF- 1 used in culture. The incomplete reversal at
high TGF- concentrations by antisense oligonucleotides may be caused
by residual Smad5 activity or to the presence of alternative signaling
pathways.
Overall, these studies suggest that the Smad5 gene plays a critical
role in the signaling pathway controlling the inhibitory effect of
TGF- on human hematopoietic progenitor cells. It remains possible
that disruption of the function of Smad5 or of other members of this
signaling pathway could lead to unrestrained hematopoietic cell
proliferation and, thus, provide one of the important steps toward
human leukemogenesis. This hypothesis is currently being explored in
our laboratory.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Submitted February 20, 1997;
accepted October 30, 1997.
Supported in part by Grant No. PO1HL 53762-03 from the National
Institutes of Health and by a generous gift from the W. M. Keck
Foundation.
Address reprints requests to Ronald Hoffman, MD,
University of Illinois at Chicago, MBRB 3150, M/C 734, 900 S Ashland
Ave, Chicago, IL 60607.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
 |
REFERENCES |
1. Bagby GC Jr, Segal GM: Growth factors and the control of
hematopoiesis, in Hoffman R, Benz EJ Jr, Shattil SJ, Furie B, Cohen HJ,
Silberstein LE (eds): Hematology: Basic Principles and Practice. New
York, NY, Churchill Livingstone, 1995, p 207
2.
Bruno E,
Luikart SD,
Long MW,
Hoffman R:
Marrow-derived heparan sulfate proteoglycan mediates the adhesion of hematopoietic progenitor cells to cytokines.
Exp Hematol
23:1212,
1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Long MW,
Briddell R,
Walter AW,
Bruno E,
Hoffman R:
Human hematopoietic stem cell adherence to cytokines and matrix molecules.
J Clin Invest
90:251,
1992
4.
Gordon MY,
Greaves MF:
Physiological mechanisms of stem cell regulation in bone marrow transplantation and haemopoiesis.
Bone Marrow Transplant
4:335,
1989[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Ryan DH,
Tang J:
Regulation of human B cell lymphopoiesis by adhesion molecules and cytokines.
Leuk Lymphoma
17:375,
1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Brandt J,
Srour EF,
van Besien K,
Briddell RA,
Hoffman R:
Cytokine-dependent long term culture of highly enriched precursers of hematopoietic progenitor cells from human marrow.
J Clin Invest
82:1017,
1988
7.
Bruno E,
Briddell R,
Hoffman R:
Effect of recombinant and purified hematopoietic growth factors on human megakaryocyte colony formation.
Exp Hematol
16:371,
1988[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Bruno E,
Miller ME,
Hoffman R:
Interacting cytokines regulate in vitro human megakaryocytopoiesis.
Blood
73:671,
1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9.
Bruno E,
Hoffman R:
Effect of interleukin 6 on in vitro human megakaryocytopoiesis: Its interaction with other cytokines.
Exp Hematol
17:1011,
1989[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Tong J,
Gordon MS,
Srour EF,
Cooper RJ,
Orazi A,
McNiece I,
Hoffman R:
In vivo administration of recombinant methionyl human stem cell factor expands the number of human hematopoietic stem cells.
Blood
82:784,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11.
Quesenberry PJ,
Ihle JN,
McGrath E:
The effect of interleukin-3 and GM CSA-2 on megakaryocyte and myeloid clonal colony formation.
Blood
65:214,
1985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12.
Emerson SG,
Yang Y-C,
Clark SC,
Long MW:
Human recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor and interleukin 3 have overlapping but distinct hematopoietic activities.
J Clin Invest
82:1282,
1988
13.
Nemunaitis J:
Cytokine-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells.
Semin Oncol
23:9,
1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Peschel C,
Paul WE,
Ohara J,
Green I:
Effects of B cell stimulating factor-1/interleukin 4 on hematopoietic progenitor cells.
Blood
70:254,
1987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15.
Sawada K,
Sato N,
Koike T:
Inhibition of GM-CSF production by recombinant human interleukin-4: Negative regulator of hematopoiesis.
Leuk Lymphoma
19:33,
1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Valent P:
Cytokines involved in growth and differentiation of human basophils and mast cells.
Exp Dermatol
4:255,
1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Bruno E,
Briddell RA,
Cooper RJ,
Hoffman R:
Effects of recombinant interleukin-11 on human megakaryocyte progenitor cells.
Exp Hematol
19:378,
1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Goldman SJ: Preclinical biology of interleukin 11: A
multifunctional hematopoietic cytokine with potent thrombopoietic activity. Stem Cells (Dayt) 13:462, 1995
19.
Du XX,
Williams DA:
Interleukin-11: A multifunctional growth factor derived from the hematopoietic microenvironment.
Blood
83:2023,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20.
Kibayashi S,
Telamura M,
Oshinni K,
Mizoguchi:
Interleukin-11.
Leuk Lymphoma
15:45,
1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Hassan HT,
Zauder A:
Stem cell factor as a survival and growth factor in human, normal and malignant hematopoiesis.
Acta Haematol
95:257,
1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Segal GM,
McCall E,
Stueve T,
Bagby GC Jr:
Interleukin 1 stimulates endothelial cells to release multilineage human colony stimulating activity.
J Immunol
138:172,
1987
23.
Briddell RA,
Bruno E,
Cooper RJ,
Brandt JE,
Hoffman R:
Effect of c-kit ligand on in vitro human megakaryocytopoiesis.
Blood
78:2854,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24.
Bruno E,
Cooper RJ,
Wilson EL,
Gabrilovic JL,
Hoffman R:
Basic fibroblast growth factor promotes the proliferation of human megakaryocyte progenitor cells.
Blood
82:430,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25.
Wilson EL,
Rifkin DB,
Kelly F,
Hannocks MJ,
Gabrilove J:
Basic fibroblast growth factor stimulates myelopoiesis in long-term human bone marrow cultures.
Blood
77:954,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26.
Keller JR,
Sing GK,
Ellingsworth LR,
Ruscetti FW:
Transforming growth factor : Possible roles in the regulation of normal and leukemic hematopoietic cell growth.
J Cell Biochem
39:175,
1988
27.
Sporn MB,
Roberts AB,
Wakefield LM,
de Crombrugghe B:
Some recent advances in the chemistry and biology of transforming growth factor-beta.
J Cell Biol
105:1039,
1987[Free Full Text]
28.
Sporn MB,
Roberts AB:
Transforming growth factor- : Recent progress and new challenges.
J Cell Biol
119:1017,
1992[Free Full Text]
29.
Stinicka E,
Ruscetti FW,
Priestley GV,
Wolf NS,
Bartelmez SH:
Transforming growth factor directly and reversibly inhibits the initial cell divisions of long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells.
Blood
88:82,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30.
Hatzfeld J,
Li M-L,
Brown EL,
Sookdeo H,
Levesque J-P,
O'Toole T,
Gurney C,
Clark SC,
Hatzfeld A:
Release of early human hematopoietic progenitors from quiescence by antisense transforming growth factor or Rb oligonucleotides.
J Exp Med
174:925,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31.
Sing GK,
Keller JR,
Ellingsworth LR,
Ruscetti FW:
Transforming growth factor selectively inhibits normal and leukemic human bone marrow cell growth in vitro.
Blood
72:1504,
1988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32.
Ottmann OG,
Pelus LM:
Differential proliferative effects of transforming growth factor- on human hematopoietic progenitor cells.
J Immunol
140:2661,
1988[Abstract]
33.
Jacobsen SEW,
Keller JR,
Ruscetti FW,
Kondaiah P,
Roberts AB,
Falk LA:
Bidirectional effects of transforming growth factor (TGF- ) on colony-stimulating factor-induced human myelopoiesis in vitro: Differential effects of distinct TGF- isoforms.
Blood
78:2239,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34.
Riggins GJ,
Thiagalingam S,
Rozenblum E,
Weinstein CL,
Kern SE,
Hamilton SR,
Willson JK,
Markowitz SD,
Kinzler KW,
Vogelstein B:
Mad-related genes in the human.
Nature Genet
13:347,
1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Hursh DA,
Padgett RW,
Gelbart WM:
Cross regulation of decapentaplegic and ultrabithorax transcription in the embryonic visceral mesoderm of Drosophilia.
Development
117:1211,
1993[Abstract]
36.
Sekelsky JJ,
Newfeld SJ,
Raftery LA,
Chartoff EH,
Gelbart WM:
Genetic characterization and cloning of mothers against dpp, a gene required for decapentaplegic function in Drosophilia melanogaster.
Genetics
139:1347,
1995[Abstract]
37.
Savage C,
Das P,
Finelli AL,
Townsend SR,
Sun C-Y,
Baird SE,
Padgett RW:
Caenorhabditis elegans genes sma-2, sma-3, and sma-4 define a conserved family of transforming growth factor pathway components.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:790,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38.
Horrigan SK,
Westbrook CA,
Kim AH,
Banerjee M,
Stock W,
Larson RA:
Polymerase chain reaction-based diagnosis of Del(5q) in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome identifies a minimal deletion interval.
Blood
88:2665,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39.
Hannon K,
Smith CK II,
Bales KR,
Stavnezer RF:
Temporal and quantitative analysis of myogenic regulatory and growth factor gene expression in the developing mouse embryo.
Dev Biol
151:137,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Methia N,
Louache F,
Vainchenker W,
Wendling F:
Oligodeoxynucleotides antisense to the proto-oncogene c-mpl specifically inhibit in vitro megakaryocytopoiesis.
Blood
82:1395,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41.
Coller BS,
Peerschke EI,
Seligsohn V,
Scudder LE,
Nurden AT,
Rosa J-P:
Studies on the binding of an alloimmune and two murine monoclonal antibodies to the platelet glycoprotein IIb-IIIa complex receptor.
J Lab Clin Med
107:384,
1986[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
42.
Cheifetz S,
Weatherbee JA,
Tsang M L-S,
Anderson JK,
Mole JE,
Lucas R,
Massagué J:
The transforming growth factor- system, a complex pattern of cross-reactive ligands and receptors.
Cell
48:409,
1987[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Massagué J:
Receptors for the TGF- family.
Cell
69:1067,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Ridley AJ,
Davis JB,
Stroobant P,
Land H:
Transforming growth factors- 1 and 2 are mitogens for rat Schwann cells.
J Cell Biol
109:3419,
1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45.
Cheifetz S,
Hernadez H,
Laiho M,
ten Dijke P,
Iwata KK,
Massagué J:
Distinct transforming growth factor- (TGF- ) receptor subsets as determinants of cellular responsiveness to three TGF- isoforms.
J Bio Chem
265:20533,
1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46.
Jennings JC,
Mohan S,
Linkhart TA,
Widstrom R,
Baylink DJ:
Comparison of the biological actions of TGF beta-1 and TGF beta-2: Differential activity in endothelial cells.
J Cell Physiol
137:167,
1988[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
47.
Ohta M,
Greenberger JS,
Anklesaria P,
Bassols A,
Massagué J:
Two forms of transforming growth factor- distinguished by multipotential haematopoietic progenitor cells.
Nature
329:539,
1987[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
48.
Laiho M,
DeCaprio JA,
Ludlow JW,
Livingston DM,
Massagué J:
Growth inhibition by TGF- linked to suppression of retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation.
Cell
62:175,
1990[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
49.
Kim S-J,
Lee H-D,
Robbins PD,
Busam K,
Sporn MB,
Roberts AB:
Regulation of transforming growth factor 1 gene expression by the product of the retinoblastoma-susceptability gene.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
88:3052,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50.
Massagué J,
Polyak K:
Mammalian antiproliferative signals and their targets.
Curr Opin Genet Dev
5:91,
1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
51.
Hahn SA,
Schutte M,
Shamsul Hoque ATM,
Moskaluk CA,
da Costa LT,
Rozenblum E,
Weinstein CL,
Fischer A,
Yeo CJ,
Hruban RH,
Kern SE:
DPC4, a candidate tumor supressor gene at human chromosome 18q21.1.
Science
271:350,
1996[Abstract]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Umans, L. Cox, M. Tjwa, V. Bito, L. Vermeire, K. Laperre, K. Sipido, L. Moons, D. Huylebroeck, and A. Zwijsen
Inactivation of Smad5 in Endothelial Cells and Smooth Muscle Cells Demonstrates that Smad5 Is Required for Cardiac Homeostasis
Am. J. Pathol.,
May 1, 2007;
170(5):
1460 - 1472.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Singbrant, J. L. Moody, U. Blank, G. Karlsson, L. Umans, A. Zwijsen, and S. Karlsson
Smad5 is dispensable for adult murine hematopoiesis
Blood,
December 1, 2006;
108(12):
3707 - 3712.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Leberbauer, F. Boulme, G. Unfried, J. Huber, H. Beug, and E. W. Mullner
Different steroids co-regulate long-term expansion versus terminal differentiation in primary human erythroid progenitors
Blood,
January 1, 2005;
105(1):
85 - 94.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Nagasako, T. Sugiyama, T. Mizushima, Y. Miura, M. Kato, and M. Asaka
Up-regulated Smad5 Mediates Apoptosis of Gastric Epithelial Cells Induced by Helicobacter pylori Infection
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 7, 2003;
278(7):
4821 - 4825.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Cao, K. C. Flanders, D. Bertolette, L. A. Lyakh, J. U. Wurthner, W. T. Parks, J. J. Letterio, F. W. Ruscetti, and A. B. Roberts
Levels of phospho-Smad2/3 are sensors of the interplay between effects of TGF-beta and retinoic acid on monocytic and granulocytic differentiation of HL-60 cells
Blood,
January 15, 2003;
101(2):
498 - 507.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Liu, Y. Sun, F. Jiang, S. Zhang, Y. Wu, Y. Lan, X. Yang, and N. Mao
Disruption of Smad5 gene leads to enhanced proliferation of high-proliferative potential precursors during embryonic hematopoiesis
Blood,
January 1, 2003;
101(1):
124 - 133.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Verma, D. K. Deb, A. Sassano, S. Uddin, J. Varga, A. Wickrema, and L. C. Platanias
Activation of the p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Mediates the Suppressive Effects of Type I Interferons and Transforming Growth Factor-beta on Normal Hematopoiesis
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 1, 2002;
277(10):
7726 - 7735.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Fan, G. Valdimarsdottir, J. Larsson, A. Brun, M. Magnusson, S. E. Jacobsen, P. ten Dijke, and S. Karlsson
Transient Disruption of Autocrine TGF-{beta} Signaling Leads to Enhanced Survival and Proliferation Potential in Single Primitive Human Hemopoietic Progenitor Cells
J. Immunol.,
January 15, 2002;
168(2):
755 - 762.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Toyota, K. J. Kopecky, M.-O. Toyota, K.-W. Jair, C. L. Willman, and J.-P. J. Issa
Methylation profiling in acute myeloid leukemia
Blood,
May 1, 2001;
97(9):
2823 - 2829.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. O. Fortunel, A. Hatzfeld, and J. A. Hatzfeld
Transforming growth factor-beta : pleiotropic role in the regulation of hematopoiesis
Blood,
September 15, 2000;
96(6):
2022 - 2036.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Jiang, H. Liang, W. Guo, L. V. Kottickal, and L. Nagarajan
Differential expression of a novel C-terminally truncated splice form of SMAD5 in hematopoietic stem cells and leukemia
Blood,
June 15, 2000;
95(12):
3945 - 3950.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Kitamura, S.-i. Aota, R. Sakamoto, S.-I. Yoshikawa, and K. Okazaki
Smad7 selectively interferes with different pathways of activin signaling and inhibits erythroid leukemia cell differentiation
Blood,
June 1, 2000;
95(11):
3371 - 3379.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Horrigan, Z. H. Arbieva, H. Y. Xie, J. Kravarusic, N. C. Fulton, H. Naik, T. T. Le, and C. A. Westbrook
Delineation of a minimal interval and identification of 9 candidates for a tumor suppressor gene in malignant myeloid disorders on 5q31
Blood,
April 1, 2000;
95(7):
2372 - 2377.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. PIEK, C.-H. HELDIN, and P. TEN DIJKE
Specificity, diversity, and regulation in TGF-{beta} superfamily signaling
FASEB J,
December 1, 1999;
13(15):
2105 - 2124.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X Yang, L. Castilla, X Xu, C Li, J Gotay, M Weinstein, P. Liu, and C. Deng
Angiogenesis defects and mesenchymal apoptosis in mice lacking SMAD5
Development,
January 4, 1999;
126(8):
1571 - 1580.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H Chang, D Huylebroeck, K Verschueren, Q Guo, M. Matzuk, and A Zwijsen
Smad5 knockout mice die at mid-gestation due to multiple embryonic and extraembryonic defects
Development,
January 4, 1999;
126(8):
1631 - 1642.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kurokawa, K. Mitani, Y. Imai, S. Ogawa, Y. Yazaki, and H. Hirai
The t(3;21) Fusion Product, AML1/Evi-1, Interacts With Smad3 and Blocks Transforming Growth Factor-beta -Mediated Growth Inhibition of Myeloid Cells
Blood,
December 1, 1998;
92(11):
4003 - 4012.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|