|
|
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Blood, Vol. 91 No. 6 (March 15), 1998:
pp. 2180-2188
Inactivation of Leukocytes in Platelet Concentrates by Photochemical
Treatment With Psoralen Plus UVA
By
Joshua A. Grass,
Derek J. Hei,
Ken Metchette,
George D. Cimino,
Gary P. Wiesehahn,
Laurence Corash, and
Lily Lin
From the Cerus Corp, Concord, CA.
 |
ABSTRACT |
A photochemical treatment (PCT) process using a novel psoralen and
long wavelength ultraviolet light (UVA, 320-400 nm) has been developed
to inactivate bacteria and viruses in platelet concentrates. This study evaluated the efficacy of PCT for
inactivation of leukocytes that contaminate platelet preparations.
Three psoralens, 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP), 4 -aminomethyl
4,5 ,8-trimethylpsoralen (AMT), and the novel psoralen S-59, were
compared using the following four independent but complementary
biological and molecular assays. (1) T-cell viability: Treatment with
150 µmol/L S-59 and 1.0 to 3.0 Joules/cm2 UVA inactivated
>5.4 ± 0.3 log10 of T cells in full-sized single-donor plateletpheresis units. Using 1.0 Joule/cm2 UVA, the lowest
dose of S-59, AMT and 8-MOP required to reduce the number of T cells to
the limit of detection was 0.05 µmol/L, 1.0 µmol/L, and 10.0 µmol/L, respectively. (2) Cytokine synthesis: Treatment with 1.9 Joules/cm2 UVA and 150 µmol/L S-59 or AMT completely
inhibited synthesis of the cytokine IL-8 by contaminating leukocytes
during 5 days of platelet storage. After treatment with 75 µmol/L
8-MOP and 1.9 Joules/cm2 UVA, only low levels of IL-8 were
detected. (3) Psoralen-DNA adduct formation: The combination of 1.9 Joules/cm2 UVA and 150 µmol/L S-59, AMT, or 8-MOP induced
12.0 ± 3.0, 6.0 ± 0.9, and 0.7 psoralen adducts per 1,000 bp DNA,
respectively. (4) Replication competence: Polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) amplification of small genomic DNA sequences (242-439 bp) after
PCT was inhibited. The degree of PCR amplification inhibition
correlated with the level of adduct formation
(S-59 > AMT > 8-MOP). In contrast, 2,500 cGy gamma radiation, a
dose that inactivates >5 log10 of T cells in blood
products, had minimal effect on cytokine synthesis and did not induce
sufficient DNA strand breaks to inhibit PCR amplification of the same
small DNA sequences. These results demonstrate that leukocytes are
sensitive to PCT with psoralens and among the psoralens tested S-59 is
the most effective. Therefore, PCT has the potential to reduce the
incidence of leukocyte-mediated adverse immune reactions associated
with platelet transfusion.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
TRANSFUSION OF CELLULAR blood products is
associated with a number of adverse immune reactions.
Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease (TA-GVHD) has been
well documented for severely immunocompromised patients1-3
as well as immunocompetent patients who have received blood from donors
homozygous for shared HLA haplotypes.4-7 T cells
contaminating cellular blood components have been implicated as the
initiating agents for TA-GVHD.8,9 There is no effective therapy for TA-GVHD which is 80% to 90% fatal.10 At
present, the primary prophylactic measure is irradiation of cellular
blood products using a gamma source.11,12 Based on more
than 30 years of clinical practice, gamma radiation has been shown to
be effective in reducing the incidence of TA-GVHD. The effective
clinical dose of gamma radiation has been determined to be 2,500 cGy
based on a clonogenic expansion assay using limiting dilution analysis (LDA).8,13 This dose is required for the inactivation of
>5 log10 of T cells in cellular blood products.
While gamma irradiation is efficacious in reducing the incidence of
TA-GVHD, transfusion-associated viral and bacterial diseases remain a
persistent problem for blood products.14 To reduce the
risks of viral and bacterial diseases associated with platelet transfusion, a photochemical treatment (PCT) process using psoralens and long wavelength ultraviolet radiation (UVA 320-400 nm) has been
developed.15-17 Psoralens are planar, aromatic molecules
that can bind reversibly to nucleic acids by
intercalation.18 On illumination with UVA, intercalated
psoralens form covalent monoadducts and interstrand crosslinks with RNA
and DNA. In the absence of repair, the psoralen-modified genomes of
viruses and bacteria are inactivated because replication cannot occur.
Because platelets do not have nuclei, they are unaffected by treatment
with psoralens and UVA. Novel psoralens have been synthesized to
maximize viral inactivation efficiency.19-22 PCT with a
novel psoralen, S-59, has been shown to be effective in inactivating a
broad spectrum of viruses and bacteria without adversely affecting in
vitro or in vivo platelet function.15,23
This report describes the additional benefits derived from a PCT
process that is antiviral and antibacterial. Because psoralens are
nucleic acid specific reagents, contaminating nucleated leukocytes in
platelet concentrates are susceptible targets for inactivation. In this
study, the inactivation of leukocytes by PCT with psoralens is
evaluated using four independent but complimentary biological and
molecular assays. Evidence is presented to demonstrate that (1) T cells
in platelet concentrates are extremely susceptible to PCT inactivation;
(2) cytokine synthesis by PCT-inactivated leukocytes is inhibited
during platelet storage because PCT is performed before storage; (3)
leukocyte genomic DNA is heavily modified by psoralens after PCT; and
(4) psoralen-DNA adducts block DNA polymerase activity and inhibit the
polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Three psoralens, 8-methoxypsoralen
(8-MOP), 4 -aminomethyl 4,5 ,8-trimethylpsoralen (AMT), and
S-59,24 were evaluated for their relative efficiency in
leukocyte inactivation. In addition, the effect of 2,500 cGy gamma
radiation was evaluated in parallel for its effect on cytokine
synthesis by leukocytes during platelet storage and on DNA
amplification by PCR. Results from this study suggest that PCT with
S-59 has the potential to serve as a superior alternative to gamma
radiation for prevention of TA-GVHD.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Preparation of Platelet Concentrates in 35% Plasma
Random donor platelet concentrates.
Five freshly drawn ABO- matched random donor platelet concentrates
(Alameda Contra Costa Medical Association, Oakland, CA) were pooled and
transferred to sterile 50 mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes in 30 mL
aliquots. After centrifugation (3,000g for 6 minutes at
22°C), the supernatant plasma concentration was adjusted to 35% by
removing 65% of the total volume and replacing it with a platelet
additive solution (PAS III) and then resuspending the pelleted
material. PAS III is a modified platelet synthetic medium (115 mmol/L
Na chloride, 30 mmol/L Na acetate, 10 mmol/L Na citrate, and 26 mmol/L
Na phosphate) similar to that used by others.25 The pH of
PAS III is 7.2 and the osmolarity is 300 mOsm/L. The platelet counts of
concentrates ranged between 1.5 to 2.5 × 106/µL.
Single donor plateletpheresis units.
Single donor plateletpheresis units were collected using a CS3000 Blood
Cell Separator (Baxter-Fenwal, Round Lake, IL) equipped with a PLT30
collection chamber with a modified procedure (Sacramento Blood Center,
Sacramento, CA). The platelets (2.5 to 5.0 × 1011)
were collected in approximately 105 mL of plasma. After resuspension, 195 mL of PAS III was added. The final platelet concentrate in approximately 300 mL was transferred into a 1-L PL2410 plastic container (Baxter-Fenwal) and placed on a reciprocal platelet shaker
(Helmer Labs, Nobelsville, IN) for storage with temperature control
(20°C to 24°C) until use. Concurrent plasma (100 to 150 mL) was
also collected and centrifuged (3,000g for 10 minutes at
22°C) to make platelet poor plasma (PPP). The platelet counts of SDP
concentrates were similar to random donor platelet concentrates.
Characterization of Platelet Concentrates
A 0.5 mL aliquot was withdrawn from each platelet concentrate using
aseptic techniques to measure plasma pH (CIBA-Corning Blood Gas System,
CIBA-Corning Diagnostics Corp, Alameda, CA). The platelet and white
blood cell counts were determined using an electrical impedance cell
counter (Hematology Analyzer, SysmexTM F-800, TOA Medical Electronics
Co, Los Alamitos, CA).
Preparation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs)
PBMCs were isolated from freshly drawn whole blood or buffy coat
(Alameda Contra Costa Medical Association) by Ficoll (Sigma, St Louis,
MO) density gradient centrifugations according to the manufacturer's
instructions. The buffy coat was diluted 4× with phosphate buffered
saline (PBS), pH 7.2 (Mediatech, Herndon, VA) before use. The final
PBMC pellet was resuspended in the appropriate volume of a mixture made
of 35% autologous PPP and 65% PASIII.
Preparation of Psoralen Stock Solutions
Stock aqueous solutions of AMT (HRI Associates, Concord, CA), 8-MOP
(Sigma), and S-59 (Cerus Corp, Concord, CA) were optically measured
with a Shimadzu UV160U spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Pleasanton, CA). The concentration was calculated using
the absorbance at 250 nm and the extinction coefficient of 26,900 M 1cm 1 for S-59, 25,000 M 1cm 1 for AMT, and 22,900 M 1cm 1 for 8-MOP. S-59 and AMT are water
soluble. In aqueous medium, 8-MOP saturates at approximately 30 µg/mL. Concentrated stock solutions of 8-MOP were made in dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO) (Research Industries Corp, Salt Lake City, UT). The
structure and synthesis of the novel psoralen S-59 are as described
previously.24 S-59 is an amino alkylated psoralen
formulated as a hydrochloride salt; it is an odorless, white
microcrystalline powder, with solubility greater than 50 mg/mL in 0.9%
NaCl. Solid S-59 is stable at high temperature. Aqueous solutions of
S-59 show good long-term stability and can be terminally sterilized by
autoclaving.
UVA Illumination
After adding psoralens at the indicated concentrations in platelet
concentrates, they were illuminated with UVA on a modified Baxter
Ultraviolet Irradiation System (Model #4R4440; Baxter-Fenwal) while
being mixed. This illumination device is air-cooled, mounted on a
reciprocal platelet shaker (Helmer Labs), and capable of maintaining
the temperature rise of the platelet concentrate to less than 1°C per
Joule/cm2 during the course of the illumination. There are
two opposing banks of seven F15T12-BL fluorescent lamps (Spectronics,
Westbury, NY) mounted approximately 8 inches from each other. Platelet
samples were placed in the center on a piece of glass between the two banks of lights. The output of this device was approximately 15 to 20 mW/cm2 permitting delivery of 3 Joules/cm2 in
approximately 3 to 4 minutes.
UVA Dosimetry
Chemical actinometry was used to normalize UVA doses for platelet
concentrates with volumes less than 300 mL. The configuration that has
been validated for viral and bacterial inactivation while preserving in
vitro and in vivo platelet function is 3 Joules/cm2 UVA
with 150 µmol/L S-59 for a 300 mL platelet concentrate.15 To deliver an equivalent dose of UVA for a 20 mL platelet concentrate, only 1.9 Joules/cm2 was required. LDA experiments with 30 mL platelet concentrates received 1.0 Joule/cm2 of UVA,
which is equivalent to a dose of 1.4 Joules/cm2 for a 300 mL platelet concentrate.
Limiting Dilution Analysis (LDA)
Preparation of allostimulator cells.
Whole blood was drawn into two 10 mL ACD collection tubes (Vacutainer,
Rutheford, NJ) from each of 10 volunteers. The PBMCs were isolated by
Ficoll density gradient centrifugation as described above. After two
washings (250g, 20 min, 22°C) in PBS, the final PBMC pellets
were pooled in RPMI 1640 (Mediatech) supplemented with 2.0 mmol/L
L-glutamine (Sigma), 50 µg/mL penicillin, 50 U/mL streptomycin (GIBCO
Life Technologies, Baltimore, MD), and 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS)
(Hyclone, Logan, UT) (RPMI/20% FBS) and counted with the Hematology
Analyzer. DMSO was added to a final volume of 10%. Aliquots of 2.0 × 106 cells/mL were placed into 1.5 mL sterile cryotubes
(Sarstedt, Newton, NC) and frozen at 80°C.
Plating of allostimulator cells.
On the day of each assay, the required number of allostimulator cells
was thawed and washed with 6 to 7 volumes of RPMI/20% FBS. The cells
were pooled, resuspended in 10 to 15 mL of RPMI/20% FBS, and
irradiated with 5,000 cGy of gamma using a Nordion Gamma Cell-1000
irradiator (Alameda Contra Costa Medical Association). After
gamma-irradiation, the allostimulator cells were centrifuged at
250g for 10 minutes at 22°C and resuspended in 2× T-cell
medium (80% RPMI/20% FBS, 20% TCGF [Cellular Products Inc, Buffalo,
NY], 100 U/mL rIL-2 [Cellular Products Inc], and 16 µg/mL PHA-M
[Sigma]). To each well of the 96-well flat bottom tissue culture
plates (VWR Scientific, Foster City, CA) 1.0 × 105 cells
in 100 µL of 2× T-cell medium were plated.
Isolation of leukocytes from platelet concentrates.
The leukocytes from a platelet concentrate sample were pelleted
(350g for 5 minutes at 22°C) and resuspended in 20 mL of PBS. This cell suspension was underlayed with 20 mL of 1-Step Platelets (Accurate Chemical and Scientific, Westbury, NY) and centrifuged at
350g for 15 minutes at 22°C. The resulting cell pellet was washed with 40 mL PBS (250g for 10 minutes at 22°C),
resuspended in 20 mL PBS, and underlayed with 10 mL of Ficoll (Sigma).
After centrifuging at 400g for 30 minutes at 22°C, the buffy
coat (8 to 10 mL) was removed and diluted 3 to 4× with PBS. The cells were recovered by centrifugation (250g for 20 minutes at
22°C) and washed twice with 40 mL of PBS (250g for 10 minutes
at 22°C). The final cell pellet was resuspended in 2 to 10 mL of
RPMI/20% FBS for plating.
Plating of control samples.
Leukocytes from control platelet concentrates that contained no
psoralen and were not UVA illuminated were diluted in RPMI/20% FBS to
achieve the following concentrations: 3,000, 1,000, 333, 110, and 37 cells/mL. Leukocytes from platelet concentrates treated with UVA alone
(1.0 Joule/cm2 or 4.0 Joules/cm2) and from
platelet concentrates treated with S-59 alone (1.0 µmol/L or 0.05 µmol/L) were diluted in RPMI/20% FBS to achieve the following
concentrations: 10,000, 1,000, 100 cells/mL. Aliquots of 100 µL of
each dilution were plated in ten replicates into wells containing 1.0 × 105 allostimulator cells plated previously as described
above. To the allostimulator cells control wells, 100 µL of RPMI/20%
FBS was added.
Plating of treated samples.
Leukocytes from platelet concentrates (30 mL) treated with low doses of
psoralen and 1 Joule/cm2 UVA were serially diluted (1:10)
in RPMI/20% FBS to achieve the following range of concentrations:
106 to 101 cells/mL. For each dilution 100 µL
was plated in each of 10 wells containing 1.0 × 105
allostimulator cells. Two experiments were performed with two independent sources of platelet concentrate. Leukocytes from platelet concentrates (300 mL) treated with 150 µmol/L S-59 and 3 Joules/cm2 UVA were adjusted to 106 cells/mL
with RPMI/20% PBS and 100 µL aliquots were plated into each of 110 wells containing 1.0 × 105 allostimulator cells. Four
replicate experiments were performed using four independent 300 mL
units of single donor platelet concentrate.
Incubation and feeding.
Cells were incubated at 37°C for 3 weeks in a humidified 5%
CO2 incubator (Forma Scientific, Marietta, OH). After 3 days, 1 week, and 2 weeks, cells in each well were fed with 25 µL of media consisting of 50% FBS, 50% TCGF, 500 U/mL rIL-2, and 80 µg/mL
PHA-M.
Data analysis.
LDA plates were scored visually after 3 weeks using an inverted
microscope (Model # CK2, Olympus, Japan). Wells with at least one
T-cell clone were scored positive. Wells without a T-cell clone were
scored negative. The T-cell frequencies were calculated by minimum
chi-square analysis based on a Poisson distribution.13,26 The log10 T-cell reduction was calculated as
log10 (fcontrol/ftreated), where
fcontrol is the T-cell frequency of the control platelet concentrate and ftreated is the T-cell frequency of the
photochemically treated platelet concentrate. Mean and standard
deviations were calculated using standard methods.
Measurement of Cytokine Levels
These experiments were performed with random donor platelet
concentrates with higher levels of contaminating leukocytes. The leukocyte level was quantified using a procedure as previously described.27 If necessary the platelet concentrates were
supplemented with leukocytes isolated from a buffy coat unit so that
the final pooled leukocyte count was 4.33 × 106/mL for
all of the samples.
Twenty milliliter aliquots of the pooled random donor platelet
concentrates in 35% plasma were transferred into mini PL2410 plastic
containers. One aliquot was not treated and served as the control. A
second aliquot was treated with 2,500 cGy gamma radiation. The other
aliquots were treated with 150 µmol/L S-59, 150 µmol/L AMT, or 75 µmol/L 8-MOP. The samples containing psoralen were illuminated with
1.9 Joules/cm2 UVA. After treatment, they were stored in
parallel with the control platelet concentrate on a reciprocal platelet
shaker with temperature control (20°C to 24°C). Samples (1.0 mL)
from each mini- platelet unit were taken on day 0 and day 5 and
centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 minutes at room temperature (IEC
Micromax centrifuge, Needham Heights, MA). The supernatant was stored
at 70°C for later analysis of the level of cytokine IL-8 by ELISA
(R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). After thawing, the plasma samples were
centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 5 minutes at room temperature and the
clarified supernatant samples were used for analysis. ELISA assays were
performed according to the protocol supplied by the manufacturer and
the absorbance measured at 450 nm (Bio-Tek EL 312 Microplate reader,
Bio-Tek Instruments Inc, Winooski, VT). Results were evaluated by
comparing absorbance measurements for each sample to a standard curve
generated by cytokine standards that were supplied with each kit.
Measurement of Psoralen-DNA Adduct Formation
The platelet concentrates were spiked with 3H-labeled
psoralens (HRI Associates) to achieve a final specific radioactivity for each psoralen of 5 mCi/mmol. Platelet concentrates were treated with 10 µmol/L, 75 µmol/L, 100 µmol/L and 150 µmol/L S-59; 150 µmol/L AMT; or 75 µmol/L and 150 µmol/L 8-MOP. After
photochemical treatment, 1.0 mL samples were centrifuged as described
above. The pelleted material was used for measurement of psoralen-DNA adduct formation.
The cell pellets were resuspended in 3 mL of 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH
8.0) containing 1 mmol/L EDTA and 0.1 mg/mL Proteinase K (Sigma), and
incubated at room temperature overnight. DNA was isolated from the
digest by equal volume extractions (2×) with phenol-chloroform
(Sigma), followed by equal volume extractions with chloroform and then
ether, and three ethanol precipitations. The ethanol precipitate was
redissolved in 10 mmol/L Tris pH 8.0, 100 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA
between precipitation steps and in water after the final precipitation.
The DNA content of each sample was determined by absorbance
measurements at 260 nm (1 O.D. unit = 50 µg/mL). The number of
psoralen adducts was calculated from residual radioactivity levels in
the DNA samples determined by liquid scintillation (Wallac Scientific,
Gaithersberg, MD) counting. Data is from two independent experiments.
PCR Amplification Inhibition Assay
Samples containing 1.0 µg DNA obtained from above were amplified for
a 242 bp sequence in the HLA-DQ locus using the primer pair
GH26/GH2728 and for a 439 bp sequence in the -globin
gene using the primer pair PC03/RS42.29 PCR reactions were
set up in 50 µL of 1× Taq Buffer (Perkin Elmer, San Francisco, CA)
containing 200 µmol/L each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP (Perkin
Elmer), 0.5 µmol/L each of the respective primer set and 2.5 U Taq
polymerase (Perkin Elmer). The control DNA sample was serially diluted
(1:10) and then amplified. The treated DNA samples were amplified
undiluted. Amplification was carried out to 35 cycles on a Perkin Elmer
Cetus DNA thermal cycler with the denaturing temperature at 95°C (30 seconds), the annealing temperature at 55°C (30 seconds), and the
extension temperature at 72°C (1 minute). The amplification products
were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 2.5% NuSieve agarose gel (FMC
bioproducts, Rockland, ME). The extent of PCR signal reduction was
estimated by comparing the degree of ethidium bromide staining of the
amplification products of treated samples with the serially diluted
untreated samples.
 |
RESULTS |
Photochemical Inactivation of T Cells in Platelet Concentrates
PBMCs isolated from freshly prepared whole blood by Ficoll density
gradient centrifugation were spiked into each of four full-sized (300 mL) single donor plateletpheresis units to achieve final leukocyte
concentrations of 4.8 × 105 to 3.4 × 106/mL. After photochemical treatment with 150 µmol/L
S-59 and 1.0 or 3.0 Joules/cm2 UVA, no viable T cells were
detected using the LDA assay. The mean ± standard deviation of T-cell
inactivation under these conditions was greater than 5.4 ± 0.3 log10 in four replicates (Table
1). These results indicate that
photochemical treatment conditions (150 µmol/L S-59 and 3.0 Joules/cm2 UVA) that are virucidal and bactericidal are
capable of inactivating high levels of T cells in platelet
concentrates.15
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1.
Inactivation of T Cells in Platelet Concentrates by
Photochemical Treatment With 150 µmol/L S-59 and UVA Light
(N = 4)
|
|
The minimum dose of 8-MOP, AMT, or S-59 required to inactivate T cells
was determined. The sensitivity of T cells to photochemical treatment
was evaluated in two dose response experiments using 1 Joule/cm2 UVA and 0.0005 to 1.0 µmol/L S-59, 0.001 to 1.0 µmol/L AMT, and 0.0002 to 100 µmol/L 8-MOP. The platelet
concentrates used for these studies had an average leukocyte count of
3.9 ± 2.0 × 106/mL. The viable T-cell frequencies of
the untreated (no psoralen, no UVA) controls in four replicates were
1/19, 1/27, 1/34, and 1/88. In the first experiment, the UVA only (1.0 Joule/cm2) control and S-59 only (1.0 µmol/L) control
reduced the number of viable T cells by 0.8 log10 and 0.7 log10, respectively. In the second experiment, the UVA only
(1.0 Joule/cm2 and 4.0 Joules/cm2) control
and S-59 only (0.05 µmol/L) control did not cause a reduction in the
number of viable T cells. These results indicate that T cells are
essentially stable to UVA or psoralen treatment alone.
However, T cells were sensitive to treatment with a combination of
psoralen and 1.0 Joule/cm2 UVA in platelet concentrates
(Fig 1). In one experiment, 0.10 µmol/L
S-59 reduced the number of viable T cells to the limit of detection by
LDA. There were no viable T-cell clones present in any of the 10 wells
plated (>4.5 log10 of reduction). In another experiment,
the lowest dose required to inactivate T cells to the limit of
detection by LDA (>4.1 log10 of reduction) was 0.05 µmol/L S-59. This concentration of S-59 is 3,000-fold lower than the
150 µmol/L used to inactivate viral and bacterial contaminants in
platelet concentrate.15 AMT was slightly less efficient. At
0.1 µmol/L, AMT reduced the T-cell frequency by 2.7 log10. The T-cell frequency was reduced to the limit of
detection at 1.0 µmol/L AMT (>4.7 log10 of reduction).
Thus, AMT is approximately 20-fold less effective than S-59 for the
inactivation of T cells in platelet concentrates. When 8-MOP was used,
no T-cell inactivation was obtained up to 0.1 µmol/L. At 1.0 µmol/L, 8-MOP reduced the number of viable T cells by approximately
2.0 log10, and accomplished inactivation to the limit of
detection at 10.0 µmol/L (>4.4 log10 of reduction).
These results demonstrate the following relative psoralen efficiency
for T-cell inactivation: S-59 > AMT > 8-MOP.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 1.
Inhibition of T-cell proliferation by photochemical
treatment of platelet concentrates with various psoralens. The dose
related effect of photochemical treatment with S-59 ( and ), AMT
( ), and 8-MOP ( ) on T cells in platelet concentrates was
characterized. Leukocytes from photochemically treated and untreated
pooled random donor platelet concentrates were plated in the LDA assay.
The minimum psoralen concentrations required to inactivate T cells to
the limit of detection by LDA ( ) after 1.0 Joule/cm2 UVA
were 0.05 µmol/L S-59, 1.0 µmol/L AMT, and 10.0 µmol/L 8-MOP. The
results in Fig 1 are from two independent experiments. Arrows indicate
the psoralen concentrations at which no viable T cells were found.
|
|
Inhibition of Cytokine Synthesis by Photochemical Treatment
The inhibition of cytokine IL-8 synthesis by contaminating leukocytes
in control and photochemically treated random-donor platelet
concentrates was compared using S-59, AMT, and 8-MOP (Fig
2). Although IL-1 , IL-6, and TNF-
have also been detected in platelet concentrate after storage, we chose
to measure IL-8 because it is produced in larger quantities during
platelet concentrate storage. Concentrations of IL-8 were found to
increase to high levels in the control platelet concentrate with
leukocyte counts greater than 1.0 × 106/mL. The level of
IL-8 increased from day 0 to day 5 suggesting that active synthesis of
IL-8 by viable leukocytes was occurring during storage. Similar
results, although with partially reduced levels of IL-8 synthesis, were
obtained for the platelet concentrate treated with the clinical dose of
gamma radiation (2,500 cGy). In contrast, photochemical treatment with
150 µmol/L AMT or 150 µmol/L S-59 and 1.9 Joules/cm2
UVA resulted in complete inhibition of IL-8 synthesis. During the five
days of platelet storage, the IL-8 level did not rise above the day 0 baseline level. After photochemical treatment with 75 µmol/L
8-MOP and 1.9 Joules/cm2 UVA, IL-8 levels rose slightly by
day 5. These results are consistent with inhibition of leukocyte
protein synthesis and correlate with the level of psoralen-DNA adduct
formation after photochemical treatment of platelet concentrates.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 2.
Inhibition of cytokine synthesis by photochemical
treatment and gamma irradiation. The synthesis of cytokine IL-8 was
measured after 5 days of storage in pooled random donor platelet
concentrates treated separately with S-59, AMT, or 8-MOP plus 1.9 Joules/cm2 UVA, and 2,500 cGy gamma radiation. The level of
IL-8 measured on day 0 before treatment served as a baseline
measurement. IL-8 levels increased significantly after 5 days of
storage in untreated platelet samples. Photochemical treatment with 150 µmol/L S-59 or AMT completely inhibited IL-8 production during
storage. Low levels of IL-8 were present after treatment with
75-µmol/L 8-MOP. A partial reduction in IL-8 production was obtained
after 2,500 cGy gamma radiation. Each data point is the average of
duplicate ELISA measurements. Error bars indicate the standard
deviation which is only significant for the untreated and gamma groups
after 5 days of storage (error bars for the other groups are not large enough to resolve on the scale in this figure). The data shown is from
a representative of five experiments.
|
|
Psoralen Modification of Leukocyte Genomic DNA After Photochemical
Treatment
Following photochemical treatment, the level of psoralen-DNA adduct
formation was measured using leukocytes isolated from platelet
concentrates (Fig 3). No psoralen-DNA
adducts were detected in leukocytes of platelet samples either
untreated or treated with psoralen or UVA alone. After treatment with
psoralen plus UVA, psoralen-DNA adducts were formed and the level of
psoralen-DNA adduct formation increased as a function of psoralen
concentration. Using 1.9 Joules/cm2 UVA, 10 µmol/L, 75 µmol/L, 100 µmol/L, and 150 µmol/L S-59 induced 1.4 ± 0.5, 5.7, 8.9 and 12 ± 3.0 adducts per 1,000 bp, respectively. At 150 µmol/L
plus 1.9 Joules/cm2, the number of psoralen-DNA adducts
were 6.0 ± 0.9/1,000 bp and 0.7/1,000 bp for AMT and 8-MOP,
respectively. These results indicate the following order of DNA binding
efficiency: S-59 > AMT > 8-MOP.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 3.
Psoralen-DNA adduct formation following photochemical
treatment with various psoralens in platelet concentrates. Psoralen adducts on leukocyte genomic DNA were measured after photochemical treatment in pooled random donor platelet concentrates by using 3H radiolabeled S-59 ( ), AMT ( ), and 8-MOP ( ) plus
1.9 Joules/cm2 UVA. Photochemical treatment with 150 µmol/L S-59, AMT, and 8-MOP induced 12.0 ± 3.0, 6.0 ± 0.9, and
0.7 adducts/1,000 bp of DNA, respectively. Points with error bars
(standard deviation) represent averages of duplicate samples obtained
from two independent experiments.
|
|
Psoralen-DNA Adducts Inhibit PCR DNA Amplification
Leukocyte DNA samples isolated from control, photochemically treated,
and gamma-irradiated platelet samples were amplified under standard PCR
conditions using a primer set for a 242 bp sequence in the HLA-DQ
locus and for a 439 bp sequence in the -globin gene (Fig
4). Similar results were obtained for both sequences. While the PCR amplification proceeded normally to plateau values with DNA of control untreated platelet samples, the
amplification of DNA of photochemically treated samples was reduced.
The degree of reduction in PCR signal varied depending on the psoralen
and treatment conditions. After 35 cycles of amplification, treatment with 150 µmol/L S-59 plus 1.9 Joules/cm2 UVA resulted in
>103-fold reduction (lane 3 v lane 11) while
treatment with 150 µmol/L AMT plus 1.9 Joules/cm2 UVA
showed 101- to 102-fold reduction (lane 4 v lanes 9, 10) in PCR signal. Treatment with 100 µmol/L S-59
plus 1.9 Joules/cm2 UVA resulted in a PCR signal equivalent
to approximately a 102-fold inhibition (lane 2 v
lane 10). Treatment with 75 µmol/L and 150 µmol/L 8-MOP resulted in
low but detectable PCR reduction (100- to
101-fold reduction, lanes 5, 6 v lanes 8, 9) only
with the 439 bp amplicon. However, after 30 cycles of amplification the
PCR signal reduction was more readily detectable for both amplicons
(101-fold inhibition, data not shown). In contrast,
leukocyte DNA of the platelet sample treated with 2,500 cGy gamma
radiation amplified to plateau values similar to DNA of control
untreated platelet concentrates even with 30 cycles of amplification
(lane 7 v lane 8). These PCR DNA amplification inhibition
results correlated qualitatively with the number of psoralen-DNA
adducts.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 4.
Psoralen-DNA adducts inhibit PCR DNA amplification.
Genomic DNA was isolated from leukocytes in pooled random donor
platelet concentrates. Platelet concentrate samples were either
untreated or treated with 10, 100, and 150 µmol/L S-59, 150 µmol/L
AMT, 75 or 150 µmol/L 8-MOP plus 1.9 Joules/cm2 UVA, or
2,500 cGy gamma radiation. Inhibition of PCR DNA amplification for the
242 bp amplicon in the HLA-DQ locus and the 439 bp amplicon in the
-globin gene was measured by comparing the band intensity of treated
samples with serially diluted (1:10) untreated samples. After 35 cycles, 150 µmol/L S-59 resulted in >103-fold signal
reduction for both the HLA-DQ and -globin amplicons. AMT at a
dose of 150 µmol/L reduced the PCR signal by a factor of
101 to 102. With 8-MOP at 75 µmol/L or 150 µmol/L detectable reduction in PCR DNA amplification
(~101-fold reduction) was observed. The reduction was
more readily detectable at 30 cycles of amplification (data not shown)
and for the 429 bp amplicon in the -globin gene. Treatment with
2,500 cGy did not result in inhibition of PCR DNA amplification. One microgram human placental DNA was amplified in the positive control sample (P). A reagent-only control sample contained no DNA (N).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
To reduce the risk of viral and bacterial disease transmission through
platelet transfusion, a photochemical treatment process using a novel
psoralen, S-59, and UVA was developed.15,19-23 Treatment conditions have been optimized for platelet concentrates to inactivate high levels of a broad spectrum of viruses and bacteria while preserving platelet function.15 This study demonstrates
that contaminating leukocytes in platelet concentrates are inactivated after treatment with psoralens and UVA. More importantly, the virucidal
and bactericidal conditions provide a large margin of safety for
leukocyte inactivation.
Contaminating leukocytes cause a number of adverse immune reactions
associated with platelet transfusions. Viable T cells are implicated as
the primary cause of TA-GVHD.1 Gamma irradiation has been
used as the primary prophylactic treatment for prevention of
TA-GVHD.10,11 A clonal T-cell expansion assay, LDA, has been used to correlate the extent of T-cell inactivation with the dose
of gamma radiation.13 A dose of 2,500 cGy was shown to
inactivate >5 log10 of T cells in packed red blood cell
units. The same LDA method was used in the present study to measure the level of T-cell inactivation in platelet concentrates by treatment with
S-59 and UVA. Under the virucidal and bactericidal treatment conditions
(150 µmol/L S-59 and 3 Joules/cm2 UVA), greater than 5.4 ± 0.3 log10 of T cells were inactivated in full-sized
single-donor plateletpheresis units. This finding suggests that
photochemical treatment with S-59 and UVA, similar to gamma irradiation
treatment, inactivates high levels of T cells in platelet concentrates
and thus has the potential to prevent TA-GVHD.
In addition, results from this study indicate that T cells are
extremely sensitive to photochemical treatment. At an S-59 dose (0.05 µmol/L) that is 3,000-fold lower than that used for inactivation of
viruses and bacteria, T cells are inactivated to an undetectable level
by LDA after 1 Joule/cm2 of UVA illumination. Therefore,
the treatment dose for viral and bacterial inactivation of platelet
concentrates provides a large safety margin for T-cell inactivation. In
contrast, the safety margin for the 2,500 cGy gamma radiation is
limited. TA-GVHD has been reported in patients who received blood
products that were irradiated with 2,000 cGy.30
The accumulation of inflammatory cytokines synthesized by leukocytes
during storage of platelet concentrates has been implicated as the
cause of febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions
(FNHTR).31,32 FNHTR are the most frequently reported
adverse immune reactions associated with platelet
transfusion.32 Leukodepletion filters used to reduce the
number of leukocytes transfused are not effective in preventing FNHTR
if they are used after storage.33,34 Photochemical treatment with 150 µmol/L S-59 and 1.9 Joules/cm2 UVA
completely inhibited synthesis of the cytokine IL-8 by leukocytes during platelet storage. Similar results with IL-8 IL-1 , TNF- , and IL-6 have been reported previously.35 Suppression of
cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells treated
in vivo or in vitro by 8-MOP and UVA was also reported
by other investigators.36 These results suggest that
photochemical treatment may provide the potential to reduce the
incidence of FNHTR associated with platelet transfusion, a benefit that
is lacking by treatment with gamma radiation. Irradiating platelet
concentrates with 2,500 cGy of gamma only partially reduced the level
of cytokine synthesis during storage. Although PCT has no effect on
preformed cytokines or complement (unpublished data) PCT with S-59 and
UVA should be performed before storage before pro-inflammatory
cytokines accumulate in the stored platelets. Bacterial contamination,
which can induce cytokine secretion in stored platelets, has been
implicated as the cause of adverse transfusion reactions.37
PCT performed before storage will also prevent bacterial proliferation
and thus reduce the incidence of these platelet transfusion associated adverse immune reactions.17
Leukocyte inactivation by photochemical treatment was also confirmed at
the molecular level. The extent of S-59 photomodification of leukocyte
genomic DNA correlated with the concentration of S-59. After treatment
with 150 µmol/L S-59 and 1.9 Joules/cm2 UVA, DNA was
modified by S-59 at the level of 12 ± 3 covalent adducts
per 1,000 bp. This level of modification overwhelms cellular repair
mechanisms and is able to inhibit gene expression.18 This
finding is consistent with the observation that synthesis of IL-8 by
leukocytes during platelet storage was completely eliminated after
photochemical treatment with S-59. In comparison, gamma radiation
(2,500 cGy) induces DNA strand breaks at a level of one per 37,000 bp.38 Therefore, the short DNA coding sequence for IL-8, a
peptide of approximately 80 amino acids, is not likely to be modified
extensively. Therefore, only partial reduction in IL-8 synthesis after
gamma treatment was obtained.
The effect of psoralen-DNA adducts on nucleic acid replication was
further demonstrated by a PCR inhibition assay. Because psoralen-DNA
adducts block DNA polymerase and inhibit replication, PCR amplification
of psoralen-modified DNA is affected.39 Using two primer
pairs, one pair encoding a 242 bp sequence in the HLA-DQ locus and
the other pair encoding a 439 bp sequence in the -globin gene, the
extent of PCR signal reduction was found to correlate with the number
of psoralen-DNA adducts. Therefore, by selecting PCR primers encoding a
sufficiently long sequence, the reduction in PCR amplification signal
can be used as an indirect measure of the psoralen-DNA modification
density. For DNA of gamma-treated samples, PCR was not affected by
using the same primer pairs. This finding is consistent with the
relatively sparse strand breaks on the DNA caused by gamma irradiation.
The results obtained from psoralen-DNA adduct formation and from PCR
inhibition assay showed that the DNA of leukocytes treated with S-59
and UVA is more extensively modified than DNA of leukocytes treated
with gamma radiation.
This study also compared the efficacy of S-59 with that of two commonly
used psoralens, 8-MOP and AMT. Results obtained from all of the
parameters evaluated are in agreement with respect to the level of
relative biological and molecular inactivation achieved. S-59 was the
most efficient psoralen of the three. Using the same dose of UVA, the
concentration of S-59 required to completely inactivate T cells in
platelet concentrates is approximately 20-fold lower than that required
for AMT and approximately 200-fold lower than that required for 8-MOP.
Under equivalent treatment conditions, DNA modification density was
lowest with 8-MOP demonstrating that 8-MOP binds to DNA less
efficiently than either AMT or S-59. Therefore 8-MOP is less efficient
than S-59 or AMT with respect to its ability to completely inhibit
cytokine synthesis.
HLA-alloimmunization that can lead to refractoriness to platelet
transfusion is another adverse immune reaction mediated by leukocytes.40 In vitro and in vivo animal studies performed with 8-MOP + UVA suggest that psoralen + UVA treatment of platelet concentrate has the potential to reduce HLA alloimmunization in platelet transfusion recipients.41 Studies with S-59 and
UVA are underway to investigate the effect of S-59 PCT on the incidence of HLA-alloimmunization.
Results presented here clearly showed that PCT with S-59 and UVA
inactivates T cells with greater potency than gamma radiation, the
current method of TA-GVHD prophylaxis in platelet concentrate transfusion recipients. Although PCT provides an alternative method for
the prevention of TA-GVHD, some physicians may choose to gamma irradiate PCT-treated platelets. In vitro platelet function studies have shown no adverse synergistic effects due to the combined treatment
of PCT and gamma radiation over 5 days of platelet storage (unpublished
data).
In summary, the results obtained from biological and molecular assays
demonstrate that photochemical treatment with S-59 has the potential to
replace gamma radiation for preventing TA-GVHD associated with platelet
transfusion. PCT provides a much larger margin of safety for the
inactivation of T cells than gamma radiation, while simultaneously
inactivating high levels of a wide variety of infectious agents
contaminating platelet concentrate. In addition, photochemical
treatment with S-59 may also provide a method that could reduce the
incidence of platelet transfusion related FNHTR. Further in vivo
transfusion studies using immunocompetent and immunocompromised
mice42-44 are underway to confirm the utility of
photochemical treatment in preventing TA-GVHD and other adverse immune
reactions associated with platelet transfusions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Submitted May 12, 1997;
accepted November 6, 1997.
Supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant No. HL 43320.
Address reprint requests to Lily Lin, PhD, Cerus Corp, 2525 Stanwell
Dr, Suite 300, Concord, CA 94520.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
The authors acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of Terri
Anderson in performing the LDA assay. Lainie Corten provided critical
contributions during the development phase of the LDA assay. The
authors also thank Dr John Hearst for his constant encouragement and
valuable suggestions throughout this study. The cooperation of Dr Paul
Holland, Vangie Schoening, and Barbara Evans of the Sacramento Blood
Center, Sacramento, CA and Dr Sherri Evans of the Alameda Contra Costa
Medical Association, Oakland, CA in supplying platelet concentrates for
this study was greatly appreciated. The Alameda Contra Costa Medical
Association also provided services for gamma irradiation of cellular
samples with the Nordion Gamma Cell-1000. David Drothler of the
Children's National Medical Center, Washington DC provided critical
information regarding the LDA assay and the IBM PC software program for
calculation of T-cell frequency from the LDA results.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Anderson KC,
Weinstein HJ:
Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease.
N Engl J Med
323:315,
1990[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Hathway WE,
Fulginiti VA,
Pierce CW,
Githens JH,
Pearlman DS,
Muschenheim F,
Kempe CH:
Graft-vs-host reaction following a single blood transfusion.
JAMA
201:139,
1967[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Greenbaum B:
Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease: Historical perspectives, incidence, and current use of irradiated blood products.
J Clin Oncol
9:1889,
1991[Abstract]
4.
Capon SM,
DePond WD,
Tyan DB,
Pepkowtz SH,
Toyoda H,
Cinman AC,
Azer PC,
Goldfinger D:
Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease in an immunocompetent patient.
Ann Intern Med
114:1025,
1991
5.
Benson K,
Marks AR,
Marshall MJ,
Goldstein JD:
Fatal graft-versus-host disease associated with transfusions of HLA-matched, HLA-homozygous platelets from unrelated donors.
Transfusion
4:432,
1994
6.
Takahashi K,
Juji T,
Kiyazaki H:
Post-transfusion graft-versus-host disease occurring in non-immunosuppressed patients in Japan.
Transfus Sci
12:281,
1991
7.
Petz LD,
Calhoun L,
Yam P,
Cecka M,
Schiller G,
Faithowicz AR,
Herron R,
Sayah D,
Wallace RB,
Belldegrun A:
Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease in immunocompetent patients: Report of a fatal case associated with transfusion of blood from a second-degree relative, and survey of predisposing factors.
Transfusion
33:742,
1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Kernan NA,
Collins NH,
Juliano L,
Cartagena T,
Dupont B,
O'reilly RJ:
Clonable T lymphocytes in T-cell-depleted bone marrow transplants correlate with development of graft-v-host disease.
Blood
68:770,
1986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9.
Vallera D,
Solderling C,
Carlson G,
Kersey J:
Bone marrow transplantation across major histocompatibility barriers in mice.
Transplantation
31:218,
1981[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Spitzer TR: Transfusion induced graft-vs-bone disease, in
Burakoff SJ, Deeg HJ, Ferrara J, Atkinson K (eds): Graft-vs.-Host Disease Immunology, Pathophysiology and Treatment. NY, Marcel Dekker,
1990, p 539
11. Anderson KC: Clinical indications for blood component
irradiation, in Baldwin ML, Jefferies LC (eds): Irradiation of Blood
Components. Bethesda, MD, American Association of Blood Banks, 1992, p
31
12.
Anderson KC,
Goodnough LT,
Sayers M,
Pisciotto PT,
Kurtz SR,
Lane TA,
Anderson CS,
Silberstein LE:
Variation in blood component irradiation practice: Implications for prevention of transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease.
Blood
77:2096,
1991[Free Full Text]
13.
Pelzynski MM,
Moroff G,
Luban NLC,
Taylor BJ,
Quinones RR:
Effect of gamma irradiation on T-cell inactivation as assessed by limiting dilution analysis: Implications for preventing transfusion associated graft vs. host disease.
Blood
83:1683,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Dodd RY: Adverse consequences of blood transfusion: Quantitative
risk estimates, in Nance SJ (ed): Blood Supply: Risks, Perceptions and
Prospects for the Future. Bethesda, MD, American Association of Blood
Banks, 1994, p 1
15.
Lin L,
Cook DN,
Wiesehahn GP,
Alfonso R,
Behrman B,
Cimino GD,
Corten L,
Damonte PB,
Dikeman R,
Dupuis K,
Fang YM,
Hanson CV,
Hearst JE,
Lin CY,
Londe HF,
Metchette K,
Nerio AT,
Pu JT,
Reames AA,
Rheinschmidt M,
Tessman J,
Isaacs ST,
Wollowitz S,
Corash L:
Photochemical inactivation of viruses and bacteria in human platelet concentrates using a novel psoralen and long wavelength ultraviolet light.
Transfusion
37:423,
1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Lin L,
Wiesehahn GP,
Morel PA,
Corash L:
Use of 8-methoxypsoralen and long wavelength ultraviolet radiation for decontamination of platelet concentrates.
Blood
74:517,
1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17.
Lin L,
Londe H,
Janda JM,
Hanson CV,
Corash L:
Photochemical inactivation of pathogenic bacteria in human platelet concentrates.
Blood
83:2698,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18.
Cimino G,
Gamper H,
Isaacs S,
Hearst J:
Psoralens as photoactive probes of nucleic acid structure and function: Organic chemistry, photochemistry, and biochemistry.
Ann Rev Biochem
54:1151,
1985[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Wollowitz S, Fang Y, Pu JT, Nerio A, Spielmann HP, Lin L,
Behrman B, Londe H, Alfonso R, Corash L, Isaacs S: Novel psoralens with
enhanced UVA dependent inactivation of human immunodeficiency virus and
reduced mutagenicity in the absence of UVA light. Blood 82(S1):402a,
1993 (abstr)
20. Alfonso R, Londe H, Cook D, Hanson CV, Rheinschmidt M, Behrman
B, Lin L: Inactivation of cell free, cell associated, and proviral
HIV-1 by the novel psoralen S-59 in human platelet concentrates. Blood
84(S1):530a, 1994 (abstr)
21. Corash L, Cook D, Reames A, Arnstein P: Photochemical
decontamination of platelet concentrates prevents transfusion induced
cytomegalovirus infection. Blood 84(S1):503a, 1994 (abstr)
22. Cook D, Lin C, Reames A, Marion PL: Inactivation of duck
hepatitis B virus in human platelet concentrate by the novel psoralen
S-59 and light. Transfusion 34(S):43S, 1994 (abstr)
23. Lin L, Behrman B, Rheinschmidt M, Mayaudon V, Payrat JM, Corash
L: Evaluation of in vitro platelet function in synthetic media
following photochemical decontamination treatment of apheresis platelet
concentrates. Transfusion 34(S):71S, 1994 (abstr)
24. Wollowittz S, Isaacs ST, Rapoport H, Spielman HP, inventors;
Cerus Corporation, assignee. Compounds for the photodecontamination of
pathogens in blood. US Patent 5,399,719. 1995, March 21
25.
Gulliksson H,
Eriksson L,
Hogman CF,
Payrat JM:
Buffy coat derived platelet concentrates prepared from half-strength citrate CPD and CPD whole blood units: Comparison between three additive solutions, in vitro studies.
Vox Sang
68:152,
1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Taswell C:
Limiting dilution assays for the determination of immunocompetent cell frequencies: I data analysis.
J Immunol
126:1614,
1981[Abstract]
27.
Kao KJ,
Scornik JC:
Accurate quantitation of the low number of white cells in white cell-depleted |