|
|
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Blood, Vol. 91 No. 7 (April 1), 1998:
pp. 2326-2333
245 bp of 5 -Flanking Region From the Human Platelet
Factor 4 Gene Is Sufficient to Drive Megakaryocyte-Specific
Expression In Vivo
By
Zheng Cui,
Michael P. Reilly,
Saul Surrey,
Elias Schwartz, and
Steven E. McKenzie
From the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA;
Departments of Pediatrics and Research, duPont Hospital for Children,
Wilmington, DE; and Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
 |
ABSTRACT |
Platelet factor 4 (PF4) serves as a lineage-specific marker of
megakaryocyte development. We previously identified two positively acting sequences in the human platelet factor 4 (hPF4) gene promoter that synergized to drive high-level luciferase reporter gene expression in vitro. Using portions of the hPF4 5 -flanking region linked to
the lacZ reporter gene, we observed in this investigation that constructs with 245 bp of 5 -flanking region were more active than constructs with 2 kb of 5 -flanking region in vitro. We created two independent transgenic mouse lines with a 245-bp hPF4/lacZ construct. Cells from these mice were tested for
-galactosidase ( -gal) expression at the mRNA level
by Northern blot and semiquantitative reverse transcription polymerase
chain reaction (RT-PCR) and at the protein level by
immunohistochemistry assay. Mice from one line showed -gal
expression specifically in all megakaryocytes of all ploidy classes
from bone marrow and in platelets. Expression level was comparable to
that driven by the 1.1-kb rat PF4 promoter in other transgenic mouse
lines. Those in the second line showed no -gal expression in
megakaryocytes, platelets, or any of the eight organs tested. The
245-bp hPF4 promoter is capable of driving reporter gene expression
in a megakaryocyte-specific manner in transgenic mice. The small size
of this megakaryocyte-specific promoter is compatible with that
required in some viral vectors and may provide a model for targeting
gene expression to megakaryocytes.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
HEMATOPOIESIS IS the process of
differentiation of pluripotential bone marrow stem cells to mature
progeny. Normal differentiation is accompanied by distinct changes in
gene expression. The platelet factor 4 (PF4) gene encodes an abundant
-granule protein and serves as a lineage-specific marker of
megakaryocyte development.1 PF4 is a protein that is
synthesized by megakaryocytes,2 packaged into -granules
of platelets, and released during platelet activation.3-6 PF4 inhibits megakaryocyte differentiation, affects angiogenesis and
tumor growth, neutralizes the anticoagulant activity of heparan sulfate
on endothelial cells, and functions as a chemokine, an immunomodulatory
substance that induces the chemotaxis of blood cells.1,7-9
The transcriptional regulation of the rat (r) PF4 gene in vitro and in
vivo has been studied.10-15 These results identified a
1104-bp fragment containing three positively acting sequences. A
prominent poly-T stretch, homologous to one in the human PF4 gene, was
defined as a negative element. This 1.1-kb fragment was used to create
transgenic mice in which the promoter drove expression of lacZ or other
reporter genes. Recently, we reported our study of the transcriptional
regulation of the hPF4 gene in vitro using transient transfection of
reporter genes driven by its promoter.16 Two
cis-acting sequences located from 107 to 239 were
critical and synergized high-level expression in TPA-stimulated human erythroleukemia cell line (HEL) cells. One sequence,
at 134 and including GATTA, may bind a GATA factor, whereas the other binds an as-yet unknown factor to a poly-T stretch
(unpublished observations, December 1995). In contrast to
the rPF4 findings, the poly-T sequence acted positively, and only one
of the three other positively acting sequences identified for rPF4 was
necessary for expression mediated by the hPF4 promoter in vitro.
The transcriptional regulation of hPF4 in vivo has not been reported.
In studies in vitro, leukemic cell lines like HEL cells are not
completely representative of the normal megakaryocyte, because they
express gene products of other hematopoietic lineages.17,18 How accurately the data from studies in vitro reflect the regulation of
the hPF4 gene during normal megakaryocyte development remains to be
determined. Given the differences with the rPF4 promoter, we were
interested in investigation of the hPF4 promoter in vivo. In
this study, a 245-bp fragment of the hPF4 promoter, the portion most
active in vitro in comparison with fragments up to 2 kb in length, was linked to the lacZ reporter gene and used to create transgenic mice. -gal expression in megakaryocytes and other tissues
of the transgenic mice was examined to determine hPF4 promoter function
in vivo.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Creation of Transgenic Mice
A 2-kb fragment encompassing the hPF4 5 -flanking
region15,19 was introduced into the pNASS vector at the
Xho I site (Clontech, Pal Alto, CA). This 2-kb
hPF4/pNASS plasmid DNA was digested with Xba I and
Sty I to create the 245-bp hPF4/lacZ DNA. The latter
plasmid included the sequence of the hPF4 gene from 245 bp to
+49 bp and 3882 bp of the lacZ gene (Fig
1). Before using the lacZ reporter gene in vivo in transgenic mice, we
first tested these two lacZ constructs in vitro, in the way we had done
previously with the luciferase reporter gene in TPA-induced HEL
cells.16 Our rationale was to use the highest expression
construct for the transgenic studies and to verify the utility of the
expression assays we planned to use for the mice. The transfected HEL
cells were stained with X-gal11 and also examined by
measurement of the enzymatic activity of -gal
(Galacto-Light Kit; Tropix, Bedford, MA) following the manufacturer's
instructions.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 1.
The 245 hPF4/lacZ DNA construct used in the creation
of transgenic mice. Primers used in PCR screening (mss3 and 2),
semiquantitative RT-PCR ( 5 and 2), and the probe for Southern
blots (3.5 kb BamHI fragment) are indicated with approximate
locations of a spliceable intron (int) and polyadenylation signal (pA)
sequences.
|
|
The purified 245-bp hPF4/lacZ DNA lacking exogenous vector
sequences was microinjected into the pronuclei of fertilized eggs from
superovulated female mice (C57Bl/6). The injected eggs were transferred
to the oviducts of pseudopregnant female mice (CD-1) by the Transgenic
Mouse Core Facility of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. All
studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committee. Pups were analyzed for incorporation of the hPF4/lacZ
transgene by PCR and Southern blot analyses as described below.
Genomic DNA was isolated from a tail biopsy of 3-week-old mice and
amplified using one primer located in the 5 -flanking region of
the hPF4 gene (mss-3, sense,
5 -GGTAATCTTGGCTGGCCAGAACCC-3 ) and a second primer ( -2,
antisense, 5 -TTAACAGGCTCTTTCGATCCC-3 ) located in the lacZ
gene (Fig 1). PCR was done for 25 cycles, with each cycle consisting of
denaturing at 94°C for 45 seconds, annealing at 65°C for 45 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 1 minute using GeneAmp PCR
System 9600 (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT). The products were analyzed by
agarose gel electrophoresis for the presence of the appropriately sized
band (417 bp). As an internal control, a fragment of the mouse
endogenous whey acidic protein (WAP) gene was also amplified using a
second set of primers, WAP-S (sense,
5 -ATCCATGTCTCCATGCCTTCTTCT-3 ) and WAP-A (antisense, 5 -TGTTGACAGGAG TTTTGCGGGTCC-3 ).20
Southern blot analysis was used to confirm PCR-positive mice and to
estimate transgene copy number. Genomic DNA (10 µg) was digested with
EcoRV or BamHI, separated in a 1% (w/v) agarose gel,
and transferred to a Zetabind filter (Cuno Inc, Meridien, CT).
BamHI-digested plasmid DNA was used as a standard for
estimating copy number by application of 1, 2, and 4 genome-equivalent
copies. The filter was prehybridized in Rapid-hyb buffer (Amersham,
Arlington Heights, IL) and then hybridized at 65°C overnight to a
radiolabeled probe made with the Random Primers Labeling Kit
(Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) using a 3.5-kb BamHI
fragment of the -gal gene as a template. The filter was washed in
2× SSC/0.1%(w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.2×
SSC/0.1% (w/v) SDS, and finally 0.1× SSC/0.1% (w/v) SDS at
65°C, and then exposed to film at 70°C with an
intensifying screen. Three bands, the 5 -junction band, the
3 -junction band, and a 4.2-kb internal band, were present if the
mouse genomic DNA had incorporated the transgene at more than one copy.
The intensity of bands on film was analyzed by Imagequant
PhosphorImager software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). The
5 - or 3 - junction band had an intensity that was
considered equivalent to one copy per genome. Transgene copy number was
calculated by comparing the intensity of the internal band with each
junction band. This calculation was also verified by comparing
transgene intensity with known amounts of plasmid DNA on the same
Southern blot (Fig 2). Equivalent loading
of DNA from genomic samples was verified by hybridization to the
endogenous mouse -actin cDNA.21

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 2.
Transgene detection by Southern blot analysis of two
transgenic mouse lines. Lanes 1, 2, and 3 contain 30, 60, and 120 pg of
transgene construct DNA, BamHI-digested. Lanes 4 and 7 are blank. Lane 5 contains 10 µg of BamHI-digested genomic DNA
from F0 no. 3, and lane 6 F0 no. 16. Lane 8 contains 10 µg of BamHI-digested genomic DNA from a negative
littermate control. The blot was hybridized with the labeled lacZ probe
shown in Fig 1. The expected 3.5-kb band for the transgene is denoted
by the arrow. Hybridization with an endogenous mouse gene showed the
expected band for lanes 5, 6, and 8 (data not shown).
|
|
Collecting Bone Marrow and Tissues
The transgenic mice and normal littermates were killed. Tissues,
including brain, lung, heart, liver, spleen, kidney, and adrenal, were
immediately fixed in 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde and 0.2% (v/v)
glutaraldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 4°C for 4 hours. Tissues were dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and 5-µm
sections were made. Femoral and humeral bones were fixed in 4% (v/v)
paraformaldehyde and decalcified in Decal F (Stephens Scientific,
Riverdale, NJ) for 30 minutes. Serial 5-µm sections of fixed,
decalcified bone marrow were prepared for subsequent labeling with
-gal and antiplatelet antibodies as described below.
Immunohistochemistry
Transgene detection.
Deparaffinized 5-µm sections were hydrated with deionized water and
briefly air dried. After antigen retrieval the tissues were blocked
with CAS block (Zymed, San Francisco, CA) and incubated with the primary antibody, a rabbit anti-Escherichia coli
-gal (1:10; 5 -3 , Inc, Boulder, CO), in a humidity
chamber overnight at room temperature. Normal goat serum (10% v/v) was
used in place of the primary antibody as a negative control. The slides
were washed three times in PBS and treated with gold conjugated IgG (H + L) for the rabbit primary antibody (Zymed) for 1 hour at room
temperature. The slides were rinsed in deionized water and treated with
silver enhancement according to the manufacturer's protocol (Zymed).
Slides were rinsed with deionized water and lightly counterstained with
hematoxylin and mounted in Advantage aqueous medium (Inovex, Richmond,
CA).
In some experiments paraffin sections of tissues and bone marrow on
slides were stained with immunogold-silver stain (IGSS). Slides were
blocked with 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA)/0.3%(v/v) Triton
X-100 for 30 minutes and incubated with primary antibody, a rabbit
anti-E coli -gal (1:100; 5 -3 , Inc) in a
humidity chamber for 1 hour at room temperature. Normal rabbit serum
was used in place of the primary antibody as a negative control. The
slides were washed three times with PBS before incubation with
secondary antibody, gold-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:30; Amersham), in the humidity chamber for 1 hour at room temperature. Slides were
subsequently treated with silver enhancement (as per manufacturer's protocol; Amersham) after washing three times with PBS. Finally they
were lightly counterstained with hematoxylin and visualized by light
microscopy.
Megakaryocyte detection.
Deparaffinized sections were rehydrated with deionized water and
briefly air dried. After antigen retrieval the tissues were blocked
with Peroxo block (Zymed) and CAS block. The slides were incubated with
4A5, a rat anti-mouse platelet antibody22 in a
humidity chamber overnight at room temperature. The 4A5 antibody was
purified from the supernatant of a culture of 4A5 hybridoma cells
(generously provided by Dr S. Burstein22) using a MAb Trap
G II kit (Pharmicia, Piscataway, NJ) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Normal goat serum (10%) was used in place of the primary
antibody as a negative control. Slides were rinsed three times in PBS
and incubated with the second antibody, a goat anti-rat IgG (1:100;
Jackson Immuno Labs, West Grove, PA) for 1 hour at room temperature.
Slides were rinsed in PBS and developed in horseradish peroxidase (HRP)
streptavidin and aminoethyl carbazole (AEC) chromogen (Zymed). Slides were rinsed with deionized water and lightly
counterstained with hematoxylin and mounted in Advantage aqueous
medium.
As a positive control for the function of the reporter construct and
the immunohistochemistry methods, pCMV/lacZ and 245hPF4/lacZ reporter constructs were transiently transfected into TPA-stimulated HEL cells. Mice expressing -gal in the liver under the control of a
viral promoter (kindly provided by Dr J. Wilson, Institute for Human
Gene Therapy, University of Pennsylvania) served as a positive control
for tissue analysis.
RNA Isolation and Northern Blot Analysis
Total RNA was isolated from bone marrow and spleen using RNA STAT-60
(Tel-Test, Inc, Friendswood, TX) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Thirty micrograms of total RNA was fractionated on a 1%
(v/v) formaldehyde/agarose gel and then transferred by capillary action
to a Zetabind filter (Cuno, Inc). The filter was prehybridized at
68°C for 1 hour, hybridized at 68°C overnight with
32P-labeled probe made from the 3.5-kb BamHI
fragment of the -gal gene, and washed in 0.5× SSC/0.1% (w/v)
SDS and in 0.2× SSC/0.1%(w/v) SDS at 68°C. The filter was
exposed to film at 70°C with an intensifying screen. To
ensure the loading of equivalent amounts of RNA per lane and the
quality of the all RNA samples, the same filter was stripped and
rehybridized with a 32P-labeled probe of mouse endogenous
-actin cDNA.21
RT-PCR
RT of known input amounts of RNA from bone marrow was performed with
random hexamers and SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Life
Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). Then PCR of -gal cDNA was performed
with primers ( 5, sense, GAGGAACTGAAAAACCAGAAAG-3 ; 2,
antisense, 5 -TTAACAGGCTCT TTCGATCCC-3 ) designed to span a
potentially spliceable intron (Fig 1). We observed with bone marrow RNA
that this intron was not spliced out. Additional studies, including use
of primers for mouse endogenous genes, which spanned small introns,
verified that RT-PCR was working appropriately on RNA and not on
contaminating DNA. The control primers for murine glyceraldehyde
phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were the same as those reported by Guy
et al.13 RT-PCR was performed for 25 cycles (94°C × 45 seconds, 60°C × 30 seconds, 72°C × 60 seconds) using 50, 100, 200, 300, or 1,000 ng of input RNA. The PCR
products were analyzed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and
visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
 |
RESULTS |
Generation of Transgenic Mice Carrying 245 bp hPF4/lacZ Gene
Based on our prior work in which we used a luciferase reporter
gene,16 we created two constructs ( 2 kb and
245 bp hPF4) linked to the lacZ gene. These were then
transiently transfected into TPA-stimulated HEL cells. -gal
expression was analyzed in one of three ways: X-gal staining, enzymatic
assay, and immunohistochemistry. The results verified that (1) both
hPF4 promoters drove expression of the lacZ reporter gene; (2) the
245-bp hPF4 promoter was more active than the 2 kb promoter; and
(3) that immunohistochemistry provided a valid alternative to X-gal
staining and enzymatic assays (Fig 3).

View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 3.
Detection of -gal expression in TPA-stimulated HEL
cells. LacZ was driven by cytomegalovirus (CMV) (A and B)
or 245 bp hPF4 promoters (C and D). (A) X-gal staining (positive
cells blue); (B) IGSS staining (positive cells brown); (C) IGSS
staining; and (D) negative control, IGSS with no primary antibody (no
brown signal). Original magnification × 500.
|
|
The 245-bp hPF4 promoter linked to the lacZ gene was chosen for
use as the transgene construct. Two of 20 founder mice (F0 no. 3 and F0 no. 16) contained the transgene as assessed by
PCR and Southern blot analysis. These two founders were bred with normal mice (B6SJLF1) to produce offspring, which were screened by PCR
with transgene specific primers (Fig 1). A second set of primers for
the endogenous WAP gene was used as a PCR control for the DNA quality.
Positive transgenic mice exhibited two bands, which were 417 bp for the
transgene and 216 bp for the endogenous gene on agarose gel (data not
shown). Negative transgenic mice exhibited only the 216-bp band. Both
founders showed germline transmission of the hPF4 transgene. Selected
PCR-positive offspring were confirmed by Southern blot, which was also
used to assess transgene copy number (Fig 2). F0 no. 3 and
F0 no. 16 contained 5 and 25 copies of the transgene,
respectively.
The 245-bp hPF4 Promoter Is Sufficient to Direct
Tissue-Specific Expression of a -gal Reporter Gene in Transgenic
Mice
Nine tissues (blood, bone marrow, brain, heart, lung, liver, spleen,
kidney, and adrenal) were obtained and analyzed from positive and
negative offspring of the two founders. Expression was analyzed at the
protein and mRNA levels. Immunohistochemistry was performed to detect
-gal protein expression in these tissues. An anti-E coli
-gal polyclonal antibody was used to compare stained positive and
negative controls by immunohistochemistry
(Figs 4 and
5).

View larger version (217K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 4.
Serial sections of bone marrow from transgenic progeny of
F0 no. 16 show megakaryocyte-specific -gal expression.
(A) In the bone marrow of transgenic mice, positive megakaryocyte
staining by IGSS (brown color) is shown. Hematoxylin counterstaining
provides the nuclear blue staining. (B) 4A5-labeled (red stained) bone marrow shows the location of immature and mature megakaryocytes. Comparison of (A) and (B) documents transgene expression in all identifiable immature (small arrows) and mature (large arrows) megakaryocytes. (C) IGSS negative control; IGSS staining of transgenic mouse without primary antibody shows absence of brown color. (D) 4A5
negative control; 4A5 staining of transgenic mouse without primary
antibody shows absence of red color. (Original magnification × 400).
(E, F) Nontransgenic negative control; IGSS (E, wider field under lower
magnification) and 4A5 (F) staining of the bone marrow of a wild-type
mouse under identical conditions as (A) and (B), respectively. IGSS is
negative, whereas 4A5 is positive as expected.
|
|

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 5.
-gal staining of megakaryocyte and platelets. (A)
Close-up of positive megakaryocyte. (B) Platelets seen in a
cross-section of a blood vessel from bone marrow of an F0
no. 16 mouse. The unstained cells are red blood cells (anucleuate) and
white blood cells (blue nuclei). Original magnification × 400.
|
|
Positive yellow-brown cells were visualized in the bone marrow from
transgene-positive offspring of F0 no. 16. Counterstaining was performed to identify cell morphology after IGSS and 4A5 staining. All morphologically identifiable megakaryocytes in the bone marrow from
positive offspring of F0 no. 16 stained positively with
IGSS (Figs 4A and 5A). No other tissues were positive. In particular, no staining was noted in the adrenal gland in the medulla or cortex. No
cells in any tissue of transgene-positive offspring of F0
no. 3 or in any transgene-negative littermates were positive for
staining with IGSS. Figure 5B is a cross-section of a blood vessel from the bone marrow from an F0 no. 16 mouse showing
-gal-stained platelets surrounded by unstained red blood cells.
There were no -gal-stained platelets observed in any F0
no. 3 or nontransgenic offspring (data not shown).
Cells labeled with the 4A5 antibody appear red in the bone marrow
sections and represent cells of the megakaryocytic lineage (Fig 4B and
F). All morphologically distinct megakaryocytes, as well as smaller
megakaryocytes, in both the transgene-positive and wild-type specimens
are labeled with 4A5. Serial sections of bone marrow show that
4A5-lableled cells that are morphologically distinct megakaryocytes
(Fig 4A and B; large arrows) are also stained with IGSS. The smaller
4A5-labeled (red stained) cells that also stain with -gal document
transgene expression in less mature megakaryocytes (Fig 4A and B; small
arrows).
Expression of the transgene in transgenic mice was detected at the mRNA
level as well as at the protein level. Total RNA was isolated from bone
marrow and spleen from positive and negative offspring of the two
founders. A 32P-labeled 3.5-kb fragment of the lacZ gene
(Fig 1) was used as a probe to detect -gal mRNA expression in bone
marrow and spleen on Northern blots. As an internal control, a mouse
endogenous -actin cDNA probe was used to rehybridize the same filter
after the 3.5-kb -gal probe was stripped from the filter. All RNAs were detectable after rehybridization with the -actin cDNA probe, indicating that high quality RNA was loaded in each lane in amounts that were approximately the same (Fig 6).
Expression of -gal mRNA was detected clearly in the bone marrow from
offspring of F0 no. 16 (Fig 6). Expression was undetectable
in the spleen of mice from either line and in the bone marrow of the
F0 no. 3 line, in agreement with the protein analysis by
immunohistochemistry.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 6.
Demonstration of mRNA expression in transgenic mice by
Northern blot. (A) RNA from wild-type mouse bone marrow (lane 1) and transgenic line F0 no. 16 bone marrow (lane 2) and spleen
(lane 3) probed with radiolabeled -gal probe. The major expected
5-kb upper band is shown, along with a lower cross-hybridizing band of
uncertain origin. In (B), the same blot is shown as in (A), after it
was stripped and reprobed with control mouse -actin cDNA probe.
Several bands hybridizing to the -actin probe are present in each
lane, allowing relative quantification of the amounts of hybridizable
RNA in each lane.
|
|
Level of Expression With RT-PCR
Semiquantitative RT-PCR was used to compare the level of expression of
the human 245 bp PF4 promoter with that of the rat 1.1-kb rat PF4
promoter, described by Guy et al.13 F0 no. 16, F0 no. 3, and wild-type mice were examined for expression
of hPF4/lacZ mRNA and GAPDH mRNA (Fig 7).
The amplified products for the hPF4/lacZ and GAPDH primers are 164 bp
and 352 bp, respectively. GAPDH primers were used to show that similar
amounts of RNA were added and that the efficiency of amplification was
similar among the samples.13 We detected expression of
-gal mRNA in the bone marrow from the F0 no. 16 line
with 50 ng of input RNA at 25 cycles. No -gal mRNA signal was
detected in the F0 no. 3 line or the wild-type mice, even
at 20-fold increases in the amount of input RNA (data not shown). These
results confirm and extend the Northern blot analysis. The steady-state
mRNA levels of -gal driven by the 245 hPF4 promoter and that
reported for E2F-1 driven by the 1.1-kb rat PF4 promoter are
equivalent.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 7.
Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis of 245 hPF4/lacZ
expression in bone marrow RNA. Increasing amounts of total input RNA
(50, 100, and 200 ng) from bone marrow of transgenic (F0
no. 16 and F0 no. 3) and wild-type (WT) mice were reverse
transcribed and amplified for 25 cycles. The PCR products for the
245 hPF4/lacZ (164 bp) and GAPDH primers (392 bp13) were
visualized by ethidium bromide staining with 2% agarose gels.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We showed expression of hPF4/lacZ reporter gene constructs by transient
transfection in vitro of TPA-stimulated HEL cells in a way similar to
our previous report for hPF4/luciferase reporter gene
constructs.16 Using the 245-bp hPF4/lacZ DNA, we
created and characterized new transgenic mouse lines. We showed that
the 245-bp hPF4 promoter is sufficient for driving expression of a linked lacZ reporter gene in megakaryocytes in the bone marrow of
transgenic mice.
Expression driven by the 245-bp hPF4 promoter was megakaryocyte
specific, as no other tissue examined showed transgene expression. This
245-bp hPF4 5 -flanking region includes positive
cis-acting megakaryocyte-specific elements, in agreement with
our previous studies in vitro.16 A critical region from
107 to 239 includes a poly-T stretch and a putative
GATA-binding site. GATA sites are seen as functional elements in gene
regulation in erythroid, megakaryocyte, and mast cell
lineages.23-27 The identity of transcription factors in the
megakaryocyte binding to the critical region, including the poly-T
sequence, is under investigation. In combination, these sites may play
a central role in megakaryocyte-specific expression.
In addition to PF4, a number of genes expressed in the
megakaryocyte/platelet lineage have had their promoters characterized in vitro, including GPIIb,26, 28-30 GPIb ,31
GPIb ,32 Fc RIIA,33 and
PECAM,34 among others. Several classes of sites for
interaction with DNA-binding proteins, notably GATA and ets,
have been identified. Elucidation of the factors regulating
differentiation is important, as abnormal differentiation of
megakaryocytic cells may be related to both thrombocytopenic disorders
and megakaryocytic leukemia.12-14,33 For platelet genes studied in transgenic mice (rPF4, hGPIIb, hGPIb , and hFc RIIA 11-14, 31, 35-37 [and unpublished observations, December
1996]), to date no construct has been studied for its ability to
provide copy-number-dependent expression in transgene-positive mice
independent of the position of chromosomal integration. In the
-globin and other gene clusters, the sequences that confer
position-independent expression in vivo are found in locus control
regions outside of the immediate gene promoter.38,39 In
this study, no reporter gene expression was detectable in one founder
line that had five copies of the transgene. The sensitivity of our RNA
analysis was such that, despite the lower copy number in that line
versus the line with megakaryocyte-specific expression, we would have
seen expression had it occurred. This suggests that 245-bp hPF4
promoter-driven expression of the reporter gene in vivo may depend on
the position of chromosomal integration, but analysis of a large number
of transgenic lines is necessary to show conclusively that expression
is position dependent.
Both protein and RNA analyses show that 245-bp hPF4 directs
-gal reporter gene expression in the megakaryocytes in the bone marrow but not in spleen. A study of rat PF4 gene regulation in transgenic mice found that the transgene was expressed in all ploidy
classes of megakaryocytes from bone marrow, but at extremely low
frequency in the spleen.11 Further studies are needed to identify reasons for the difference in transgene expression in the
megakaryocytes in bone marrow versus spleen. It is known that exogenous
factors can induce functional, morphological, and biochemical changes
in megakaryocytic cell lines.11, 17, 40-42 Soluble
extracellular factors and/or cell-cell contacts in the microenvironment of the spleen may affect the properties of
megakaryocytes there such that they differ from those developing in
bone marrow.
X-gal staining is a common method to detect -gal in tissues and was
used in studies with the 1.1-kb rat PF4 promoter.11 In our
study, X-gal staining of megakaryocytes from transgenic line no. 16 was
seen, but high background was observed. When using IGSS
immunohistochemistry to stain tissues we observed very clear, robust
positive cells in the bone marrow of transgenic mice. The use of the
anti-E coli -gal antibody to detect transgene expression results in high specificity and distinguishes transgene-encoded -gal
from endogenous -gal. With X-gal staining, we and others have found
endogenous -gal activity difficult to block completely, especially
when measuring low levels of E coli -gal
activity.43 Our study suggests that immunohistochemistry is
more specific and sensitive than X-gal staining, and others have had
similar experience.44 We did not see expression of -gal
in the adrenal gland, in contrast to the observation with the rPF4
promoter.11 This may reflect differences in the human
versus the rat promoter and/or differences in the sensitivity
of the detection methods.
There are a number of potential reasons why -gal expression in our
mice could not be detected above background using X-gal staining. The
245-bp hPF4 promoter may drive lower level expression than the
1.1-kb rat PF4 promoter in the mouse. To investigate this possibility,
we compared our transgene RNA level of expression with the report in
which transgene E2F-1 was driven by the 1.1-kb rPF4
promoter.13 We found an equivalent level of expression in
our F0 no. 16 and their highest expressing line in that the products were detected with 50 ng of input RNA and 25 cycles of RT-PCR.
Formal comparison of RNA expression levels on a per-gene-copy basis was
not possible because in the rPF4 work no correlation between expression
and copy number was seen (M.O. Robinson, personal communication, June 1997). Within the limits of current technology, we
cannot with certainty invoke chromosomal integration site effects, promoter strength effects, or other factors as the cause of any differences in the level of protein expression as manifested by different X-gal staining properties of megakaryocytes in the hPF4 and
rPF4 transgenic mouse lines.
Our results show that the 245-bp hPF4 construct contains
elements that drive megakaryocyte-specific expression in vivo. It may
be a good model to use for targeting gene expression to megakaryocytes. Some viral vectors used for human gene therapy, such as
adeno-associated virus, have limitations on the size of
DNA that can be accommodated. Thus, there is a real utility in defining
short promoter fragments that drive megakaryocyte-specific expression
in vivo, because more room is left for the structural gene of interest
(eg, those for coagulation factors, etc). Work is in progress in our
laboratory on the identification of sequences, which may confer
high-level and position-independent expression in the
megakaryocyte/platelet in vivo.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Submitted March 4, 1997;
accepted November 14, 1997.
Supported by a grant from the Public Health Service, NIH RO1 DK16691.
Address reprint requests to Steven E. McKenzie, MD, PhD, duPont
Hospital for Children, 1600 Rockland Rd, Wilmington, DE 19899.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" is accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
We thank Dr Mortimer Poncz for sharing reagents and critical input. We
thank Drs Lin Hu and Toshio Asakura of the Transgenic Mouse Core
Facility of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Carol Barone and
the staff of the Research Histology Core at the duPont Hospital for
Children provided invaluable assistance. We thank Drs Diana Cassel and
Chris Stoeckert for their advice and encouragement, and Scott M. Taylor, Chris Chien, and Marybeth Helfrich for technical assistance.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Doi T,
Greenberg SM,
Rosenberg RD:
Structure of rat platelet factor 4 gene: A marker for megakaryocyte differentiation.
Mol Cell Biol
7:898,
1987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2.
Zucker MB,
Katz J:
Platelet factor 4: Production, structure, and physiologic and immunologic action.
Exp Biol Med
198:693,
1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Conley CL,
Hartman RC,
Lalley JS:
The relationship of heparin activity to platelet concentration.
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med
69:248,
1948
4.
Broekman MJ,
Handin RI,
Cohen P:
Distribution of fibrinogen and platelet factor 4 and XII in subcellular fractions of human platelet.
Br J Haematol
31:51,
1975[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Kaplan KL,
Broekman MJ,
Chernoff A,
Lesznik GR,
Drillings M:
Platelet -granule proteins: Studies on release and subcellular localization.
Blood
53:604,
1979[Free Full Text]
6.
Ryo R,
Nakeff A,
Huang SS,
Ginsberg M,
Deuel TF:
New synthesis of a platelet-specific protein: Platelet factor 4 synthesis in a megakaryocyte-rabbit bone marrow culture system.
J Cell Biol
96:515,
1983[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7.
Walz DA,
Hung G-L:
In vivo studies on the binding of heparin and its fraction with platelet factor 4.
Thromb Haemost
11:40,
1985
8.
Senior RM,
Griffin GL,
Huang JS,
Walz DA,
Deuel TF:
Chemotactic activity of platelet Alpha granule proteins for fibroblasts.
J Cell Biol
96:382,
1983[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9.
Bebawy ST,
Gorka J,
Hyers TM,
Webster RO:
In vitro effects of platelet factor 4 normal human neutrophil functions.
J Leukoc Biol
39:434,
1986
10.
Ravid K,
Doi T,
Beeler DL,
Kuter D,
Rosenberg RD:
Transcriptional regulation of the rat platelet factor 4 gene: Interaction between an enhancer/silencer domain and the GATA site.
Mol Cell Biol
11:6116,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11.
Ravid K,
Beeler DL,
Rabin MS,
Ruley HE,
Rosenberg RD:
Selective targeting of gene products with the megakaryocyte platelet factor 4 promoter.
Proc Natl Acad Sci
88:1521,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12.
Robinson MO,
Zhou W,
Hokom M,
Danilenki DM,
Hsu RY,
Atherton RE,
Xu W,
Mu S,
Saris CJ,
Swift S,
Elliot G,
Castillo JD,
Hunt P,
Bosselman RA:
The tsA58 simian virus 40 large tumor antigen disrupts megakaryocyte differentiation in transgenic mice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci
95:12798,
1994
13.
Guy CT,
Zhou W,
Kaufman S,
Robinson MO:
E2F-1 blocks terminal differentiation and causes proliferation in transgenic megakaryocytes.
Mol Cell Biol
16:685,
1996[Abstract]
14.
Thompson A,
Zhang Y,
Kamen D,
Jackson CW,
Cardiff RD,
Ravid K:
Deregulated expression of c-myc in megakaryocytes of transgenic mice increases megakaryopoiesis and decreases polyploidization.
J Biol Chem
271:22976,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15.
Ravid K,
Li YC,
Rayburn HB,
Rosenberg RD:
Targeted expression of a conditional oncogene in hematopoietic cells of transgenic mice.
J Cell Biol
123:1545,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16.
Ramachandran B,
Surrey S,
Schwartz E:
Megakaryocyte-specific positive regulatory sequence 5 to the human PF4 gene.
Exp Hematol
23:49,
1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Papayannopoulou T,
Nakamoto B,
Yokochi T,
Chait A,
Kannagi R:
Human erythroleukemia cell line (HEL) undergoes a drastic macrophage-like shift with TPA.
Blood
62:832,
1983[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18.
Papayannopoulou T,
Nakamoto B,
Kurachi S,
Tweeddale M,
Messner H:
Surface antigenic profile and globin phenotype of two new human erythroleukemia lines: Characterization and interpretations.
Blood
72:1029,
1988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19.
Eisman R,
Surrey S,
Ramachandran B,
Schwartz E,
Poncz M:
Structural and functional comparison of the genes for human platelet factor 4 and PF4alt.
Blood
76:336,
1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20.
Drews R,
Drohan WN,
Lubon H:
Transgene detection in mouse tail digests.
Biotechniques
17:866,
1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Alonso S,
Minty A,
Bourlet Y,
Buckingham M:
Comparison of three actin-coding sequence in the mouse; Evolutionary relationship between the actin genes of warm-blooded vertebrates.
J Mol Evol
23:11,
1986[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Burstein SA,
Friese P,
Downs T,
Mei R:
Characteristics of a novel rat anti-mouse platelet monoclonal antibody: Application to studies of megakaryocytes.
Exp Hematol
20:1170,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Martin DIK,
Zon L,
Mutter G,
Orkin SH:
Expression of an erythroid transcription factor in megakaryocytic and mast cell lineages.
Nature
344:444,
1990[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Romeo P-H,
Prandini M-H,
Joulin V,
Mignotte V,
Prenant M,
Vainchenker W,
Marguerie G,
Uzan G:
Megakaryocytic and erythrocytic lineages share specific transcription factor.
Nature
344:447,
1990[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Weiss MJ,
Orkin SH:
GATA transcription factors: Key regulators of hematopoiesis.
Exp Hematol
23:99,
1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Martin F,
Prandini M-H,
Thevenon D,
Marguerie G,
Uzan G:
The transcription factor GATA-1 regulates the promoter activity of the platelet glycoprotein IIb gene.
J Biol Chem
268:21606,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27.
Aird WC,
Parvin JD,
Rosenberg RD:
The interaction of GATA-binding proteins and basal transcription factors with GATA box-containing core promoters.
J Biol Chem
269:883,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28.
Uzan G,
Prenant M,
Prandini M-H,
Martin F,
Marguerie G:
Tissue-specific expression of the platelet GPIIb gene.
J Biol Chem
266:8932,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29.
Prandini M-H,
Uzan G,
Martin F,
Thevenon D,
Marguerie G:
Characterization of a specific erythromegakaryocytic enhancer within the glycoprotein IIb promoter.
J Biol Chem
267:10370,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30.
Block KL,
Ravid K,
Phung QH,
Poncz M:
Characterization of regulatory elements in the 5 -flanking region of the rat GPIIb gene by studies in a primary rat marrow culture system.
Blood
84:3385,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31.
Ware J,
Russell SR,
Marchese P,
Ruggeri ZM:
Expression of human platelet glycoprotein Iba in transgenic mice.
J Biol Chem
268:8376,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32.
Ludlow LB,
Schick BP,
Budarf ML,
Driscoll DA,
Zackai EH,
Cohen A,
Konkle BA:
Identification of a mutation in a GATA binding site of the platelet glycoprotein Ib promoter resulting in the Bernard-Soulier syndrome.
J Biol Chem
271:22076,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33.
Kiss C,
Surrey S,
Schreiber AD,
Schwartz E,
McKenzie SE:
Human c-kit ligand induces platelet Fc receptor expression in megakaryoblastic cells.
Exp Hematol
24:1004,
1996
34.
Gumina RJ,
Kirschbaum NE,
Piotrowski K,
Newman PJ:
Characterization of the human platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 promoter: Identification of a GATA-2 binding element required for optimal transcriptional activity.
Blood
89:1260,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35.
Tronik-LeRoux D,
Roullot V,
Schweitzer A,
Berthier R,
Marguerie G:
Suppression of erythro-megakaryocytopoiesis and the induction of reversible thrombocytopenia in mice transgenic for the thymidine kinase gene targeted by the platelet glycoprotein IIb promoter.
J Exp Med
181:2141,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36.
Kitaguchi T,
Murata M,
Kuramochi T,
Kobayashi K,
Ito M,
Ueyama Y,
Nomura T,
Hikichi K,
Miyakawa Y,
Handa M,
Hiraoka Y,
Aiso S,
Ikeda Y:
Establishment and characterization of transgenic mice expressing human glycoprotein Iba.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
218:418,
1996
37. (abstr)
McKenzie SE,
Cui Z,
Taylor S,
Malladi P,
Yuhan H,
Chien C,
Surrey S,
Schwartz E:
Models of human platelet gene expression in vivo.
Blood
88:26a,
1996
38.
Felsenfeld G:
Chromatin as an essential part of the transcriptional mechanism.
Nature
355:219,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Dillon N,
Grosveld F:
Transcriptional regulation of multigene loci: Multilevel control.
Trends Genet
9:134,
1993 |