Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mongini, P. K.A.
Right arrow Articles by Inman, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mongini, P. K.A.
Right arrow Articles by Inman, J. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Immunobiology
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, Vol. 92 No. 10 (November 15), 1998: pp. 3756-3771

Evidence for an Upper Affinity Threshold for Anti-IgM-Induced Apoptosis in a Human B-Cell Lymphoma

By Patricia K.A. Mongini, Qingyang Liu, Maria A. Vilensky, Patricia F. Highet, and John K. Inman

From the Department of Rheumatology, Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY; the Department of Pathology, Kaplan Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY; and the Laboratory of Immunology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The influence of ligand:receptor affinity on B-cell antigen receptor (BCR)-induced apoptosis in the IgM+ Burkitt lymphoma line, Ramos, was evaluated with a group of affinity-diverse murine monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) specific for human B-cell IgM. The studies showed not only a minimal affinity threshold for the induction of apoptosis, but, interestingly, also a maximal affinity threshold above which increases in affinity were associated with diminished apoptosis. The lesser capacity of high-affinity MoAb to induce apoptosis was paralleled by a lesser capacity to induce receptor cross-linking. At high ligand concentration, high MoAb affinity was also associated with a diminished capacity to induce early protein tyrosine phosphorylation. The compromised capacity of two high-affinity MoAbs to trigger apoptosis may be, at least in part, explained by two separate phenomena that can impair the formation of mIgM cross-links: (1) more stable univalent binding and (2) a tendency for monogamous binding of both MoAb Fab to two Fab epitopes on mIgM. These in vitro studies suggest that the use of the highest affinity MoAbs for antireceptor immunotherapies that depend on receptor cross-linking might, on occasion, be contraindicated.
© 1998 by The American Society of Hematology.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

IN ADDITION TO serving as a transducer of signals for clonal proliferation, the membrane Ig (mIg) receptor complex on B cells can, when cross-linked, initiate signals that lead to growth inhibition and apoptosis. The biochemical explanation for these diverse functional effects is only beginning to be understood. Although the signal transducing pathways for both proliferation and apoptosis involve early protein tyrosine phosphorylation and upregulation of intracellular Ca2+,1-5 the pathway for apoptosis results in the activation of cysteine proteases characteristic of programmed cell death.6 Studies with normal untransformed B lymphocytes have shown that immature B cells are more susceptible to apoptosis than are mature B lymphocytes given the same degree of mIg engagement by antigen or surrogate antigen, ie, anti-Ig antibody (Ab).7 However, mature B lymphocytes are not refractory to induction of apoptosis via the mIg signaling pathway and can be induced to programmed cell death upon very extensive receptor cross-linking.8-10 Importantly, transformed B-lymphocyte clones are also susceptible to growth regulation after signal transduction through the antigen receptor complex. Evidence in support of Ag-mediated positive selection during the clonal expansion of B-cell malignancies is fairly abundant,11-15 and primary cultures of certain malignant B cells can proliferate in response to mIg cross-linking.16,17 Conversely, transformed B cells can also receive signals for growth cessation and apoptosis upon culture with mIg cross-linking ligands.3-6,10,16,18 Certain malignant B-cell populations have been described that respond either positively or negatively depending upon the apparent degree of receptor cross-linking and the presence or absence of cytokines.16,17

The above-described and other19-28 evidence strongly suggest that the qualitative response of both B and T lymphocytes to antigen engagement is influenced by the quantitative amount of signal. Importantly, the quantitative amount of signal is strongly influenced by the interrelationship between mIg:Ag affinity, Ag concentration, Ag valency, and mIg density.19-29 These factors must be taken into consideration in determining whether a given mIg-binding ligand might be useful in therapies designed to negatively regulate malignant B-cell growth.

In the present study, we use a series of well-characterized antihuman IgM monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) of known binding site specificity and known binding site affinity30 to explore how a ligand's affinity for mIg might influence the induction of apoptosis in the human Burkitt lymphoma B-cell line, Ramos. This cell line has been previously shown to be triggered into apoptosis upon cross-linking of its mIgM receptors.10,31 Interestingly, the study shows that, above an upper threshold, an increase in ligand:receptor affinity diminishes the potential for triggering apoptosis. Evidence is presented in support of two mechanisms that may contribute to this phenomenon.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Cells.   The IgM+, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-negative Burkitt lymphoma B-cell line, Ramos,32 was kindly provided by Dr Vince Tsiagbe (New York University Medical Center, New York, NY) and was maintained in RPMI-1640 + 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) + 20 mmol/L HEPES + 2 mmol/L glutamine + 5 × 10-5 mol/L 2-mercaptoethanol.

Murine antihuman IgM MoAb and anti-IgM:dextran conjugates.   Previous reports have described the derivation, epitope specificity, and intrinsic Fab' affinity of the seven anti-IgM MoAbs used in the present study.30,33 MoAbs with specificity for the Cµ1, Cµ2, and Cµ4 domains of IgM are represented. Fab' fragments of each MoAb have been shown to bind two identical epitopes per mIgM molecule.30 The MoAb that we have designated HB57 in this and previous studies30,33 is of the same clonal origin as MoAb DA4.4 used in other studies10 (American Type Culture Collection, Bethesda, MD). All MoAbs are of murine IgG1 isotype and were purified from hybridoma ascitic fluid by Affigel Protein-A-column chromatography (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). MOPC-21 was used as an isotype control for the anti-IgM MoAbs. The preparations of MoAb:dextran conjugates used in this study have also been described previously and contained either 15-21 anti-IgM MoAb per dextran20 or 10-12 anti-IgM MoAb plus a similar number of B-cell nonspecific MoAb (UPC-10) covalently conjugated to each high molecular weight (MW) dextran molecule.34 In the latter case, UPC-10 had been cocoupled to the dextran as an isotype control for another cocoupled B-cell-specific MoAb tested in the previous study.34 The anti-IgM MoAbs coupled to dextran were all specific for the same or proximal epitope on the Cµ2 domain of human mIgM, but bound with varying intrinsic affinities, ie, MoAb HB57 (Ka = 5 × 108 mol/L-1), MoAb Mu53 (Ka = 2 × 107 mol/L-1), and MoAb P24 (Ka = 2 × 106 mol/L-1).30,33

Cell culture conditions and assays for apoptosis.   Ramos cells were cultured in triplicate microtiter wells at 105 cells per 200 µL in culture medium containing various concentrations of anti-IgM MoAb or anti-IgM:dextran conjugate. Apoptosis was assessed by staining with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-annexin and flow cytometric analysis (Becton Dickinson FACScan; Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) as described elsewhere35 (Apoptosis Detection Kit from R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Positive staining with FITC-annexin reflects a shift of phosphatidyl serine from the inner to the outer layer of the cytoplasmic membrane that occurs early in apoptosis.35 In an assay in which four identical replicates of control cultures or anti-IgM-treated apoptotic cultures were evaluated for the percentage of annexin-positive cells and mean fluorescence intensity of FITC-annexin binding, we observed minimal intraexperimental variability, ie, standard deviation (SD) values were less than 6% of the mean values. In some experiments, apoptotic cells were monitored for nuclear fragmentation by staining overnight (ON) with a hypotonic propidium iodide (PI) solution and subsequent flow cytometric analysis to detect nuclei with hypodiploid levels of DNA, as described by Nicoletti et al.36

Culture conditions for protein tyrosine phosphorylation and preparation of lysates.   For measurements of protein tyrosine phosphorylation, Ramos cells were washed in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) + 20 mmol/L HEPES, equilibrated in this serum-free medium at 37°C for 30 minutes, and incubated at 4 × 106 cells per 2 mL with the indicated concentrations of bivalent anti-IgM MoAb or anti-IgM:dextran for 1 or 5 minutes. After the appropriate culture interval, 8 mL of ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) + 1 mmol/L Na3VO4 were added and the cells were spun at 1,500 rpm for 5 minutes. After one additional wash with 8 mL of the same buffer, the cells were resuspended in 0.5 mL PBS + 1 mmol/L Na3VO4, transferred into prechilled microfuge tubes, and spun at 14,000 rpm for 10 seconds. The pellets were resuspended in 100 µL of ice-cold 1× lysis buffer (20 mmol/L Tris-Cl, pH 8, 10% vol/vol glycerol, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 2 mmol/L EDTA, 1 mmol/L Na3VO4, 1% Triton X-100, 1% aprotinin, 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.06 mg/mL ovomucoid trypsin inhibitor, 0.3 mmol/L TLCK, 20 µmol/L leupeptin). After 10 minutes of incubation on ice, the lysates were spun at 14,000 rpm at 4°C for 15 minutes and the supernatants were transferred into prechilled microtubes. Two 10-µL aliquots were removed for a BCA protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL), and the remainder of each lysate was stored at -70°C until further use.

Analysis of lysates for tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins.   Lysates (5 to 20 µg protein per lane, depending on the experiment; identical loading of samples within an experiment) were electrophoretically separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) under reducing conditions for 2 hours (200 V) on minislab 10% acrylamide gels, together with prestained MW markers (Sigma #1677; Sigma, St Louis, MO) and a positive control for tyrosine phosphorylated proteins (1:20 dilution of an epidermal growth factor-stimulated cell lysate [gift of J. Schlessinger Laboratory, New York University Medical Center] that had been aliquoted and frozen at -70°C). After electrophoresis, the separated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose. A blocking step was performed at room temperature (RT) for 20 minutes with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in washing buffer (10 mmol/L Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 100 mmol/L NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20), and the blots were then incubated for 40 minutes at RT on a rocker with a 1:5,000 dilution of horseradish-peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated recombinant anti-P(tyr) RC20H (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, NY) before washing and reincubation with ECL reagents purchased from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL). ECL detection was on autoradiographic film (Dupont NEF-496; Dupont, Wilmington, DE).

As a check for the amount of protein loaded per lane, blots were reprobed with a 1:10,000 dilution of rabbit anticatalase (kind gift of Dr Paul Lazarow, Mt Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY)37 in blocking buffer (5% milk [Bio-Rad] in washing buffer) after the following steps: (1) a stripping procedure that involved incubation of the dry nitrocellulose blot, while rocking, with washing buffer adjusted to pH 2.3 for 10 minutes at RT; (2) 4 quick (~5 seconds) washes with a large volume of washing buffer at normal pH 7.5; and (2) a 20-minute blocking step with 5% milk in washing buffer. The bound rabbit anticatalase was detected, after washing steps (4 quick washes plus 4 additional 5-minute washes while rocking), by the addition of a 1:5,000 dilution of HRP-conjugated goat antirabbit Ab (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc, Santa Cruz, CA) and ECL as described above.

The densitometric intensity of P(tyr) bands and catalase bands on autoradiographic film was quantitated by a Molecular Dynamics (Sunnyvale, CA) scanning densitometer and associated Molecular Dynamics ImageQuaNT software. For each blot, band volume measurements for anti-P(tyr) intensity were corrected by a protein loading adjustment factor. The protein adjustment factor was determined by quantitating the densitometric intensity (volume) of each catalase band in the various lanes of the stripped and reprobed blot. The lane with the lowest densitometric intensity of catalase was given an adjustment factor value of 1. The adjustment factor values for other lanes were determined by dividing the densitometric intensity of the catalase band in each of the other lanes in a given blot by the densitometric intensity of the catalase band in the lane with the lowest intensity. Division of the intensity values for P(tyr) proteins in each lane by that lane's protein adjustment factor compensated for variations in the loading of protein between lanes. (The mean ± SD of the adjustment factors calculated for the various reported lanes was 1.9 ± 1.0.) The corrected P(tyr) intensity value for each protein in lysates from control (MOPC-21-incubated) cells was then subtracted from the corrected P(tyr) intensity value for the respective protein in lysates from anti-IgM-stimulated B cells to give Delta  values for anti-IgM-stimulated protein tyrosine phosphorylation of each protein band. Finally, the Delta  values were expressed as a percentage of the maximum Delta  values observed for that protein under the conditions of high-, intermediate-, or low-affinity anti-IgM stimulation at a given time point (1 or 5 minutes). The mean percentage of maximum Delta  values ± SD for several pooled experiments is presented.

Assay of tyrosine phosphorylation in proteins associated with the insoluble cytoskeleton.   To assess the degree of tyrosine phosphorylation in proteins associated with the insoluble cytoskeleton, the Triton X-100 insoluble pellet was washed once with 1 mL lysis buffer before being resuspended in 100 µL SDS-PAGE sample buffer + 5% 2-ME. The samples were boiled for 5 minutes and passed 10× through a 25-gauge needle as described by Gold et al.38 The samples were then spun for 5 minutes (14,000 rpm) and the supernatants were stored at -70°C. At the time of assay, a 10-µL aliquot of each boiled sample was separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and assayed for protein tyrosine phosphorylation by ECL as described above.

Cell immunofluorescence assays.   In experiments with intact MoAb, the relative potential of the various anti-IgM MoAb to bind Ramos cells was assessed by indirect immunofluorescence assays followed by flow cytofluorimetric analysis with a FACScan equipped with Lysys II software (Becton Dickinson), as described elsewhere.34 In one set of experiments (see Fig 3), 1 × 105 cells were incubated for 5 minutes with the primary MoAb at 37°C in a volume of 200 µL RPMI-1640 + 1% BSA + 15 mmol/L sodium azide + 50 mmol/L 2-deoxy-D-glucose to prevent receptor internalization and capping,39 before washing, reincubation with FITC-conjugated sheep F(ab')2 antimouse IgG Ab for 30 minutes at 4°C in assay buffer, additional washing, and fixation in 1% paraformaldehyde. In another set of experiments (see Fig 4), 1 × 105 cells were stained with the anti-IgM MoAbs (or isotype control MoAb) in a volume of 100 µL assay buffer (PBS + 1% BSA + 0.1% sodium azide) at 4°C for 45 minutes, before staining with secondary Ab, as described above.

Flow cytometric evaluation of the kinetics of anti-IgM Fab' and F(ab')2 dissociation.   FITC-conjugated HB57 and Mu53 F(ab')2 were prepared by conjugation of purified F(ab')2 fragments with 6-(fluorescein-5-(and -6)-carboxyamido) hexanoic acid, succinimidyl ester (Molecular Probes F-2181; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) using methods provided by the probe manufacturer. The conjugation ratios for these F(ab')2 fragments were 12.9 and 13.2 mol of dye/mol of protein for HB57 and Mu53, respectively. The FITC-conjugated F(ab')2 were reduced and alkylated using previously described procedures30 to form FITC-Fab' fragments and the reduction confirmed by SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions. For the dissociation experiments, Ramos cells (105) were incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature in a 0.3 mL volume with FITC-conjugated anti-IgM fragments (16.5 µg/mL; MoAb protein:cell ratio of 5 µg/105 cells) in medium containing 0.02% azide and 10 mmol/L 2-deoxy-D-glucose to prevent capping and internalization.39 After the 5-minute incubation period, a 0.3 mL volume of excess unlabeled MoAb HB57 (1 mg/mL) diluted in FACScan sheath fluid or, alternatively, sheath fluid alone was added. Flow cytometric analysis of the level of FITC fluorescence on scatter-gated cells was begun immediately after addition of sheath fluid with or without unlabeled protein, using a low flow rate and time as a parameter, for a total of 560 seconds. The events acquired throughout this period were gated into 80-second intervals (0 to 80 seconds, 81 to 160 seconds, etc), and the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the cells acquired during each interval was determined with the use of the FACScan-associated Lysys II software (Becton Dickinson). The amount of nonspecific fluorescence of each ligand on Ramos cells was determined by preculturing Ramos cells for 5 minutes with a 90-fold excess of unlabeled MoAb HB57 before the 5 minutes of incubation with each FITC-conjugated F(ab')2 or F(ab') ligand, as described above. The MFI values obtained during acquisition of cells during the first 40 seconds after the addition of 0.3 mL sheath fluid to the latter cells was taken as the amount of nonspecific binding. (Importantly, past experiments have shown that MoAb HB57 and MoAb Mu53 bind to proximal Cµ2 epitopes and that high-affinity MoAb HB57 is more effective at inhibiting binding of Mu53 to IgM than is intermediate-affinity MoAb Mu53 itself.33 Recent experiments confirmed that unlabeled HB57 and unlabeled Mu53 were equivalent at inducing the dissociation of FITC-Mu53 F(ab')2 from Ramos IgM; data not shown.) The values for nonspecific binding were subtracted from each of the binding values obtained during the dissociation experiments. The amount of specific FITC-anti-IgM F(ab')2 or Fab' remaining bound after each 80-second interval was divided by the specific fluorescence noted during the initial 0- to 20-second time interval (t = 0), and this ratio was plotted versus time to obtain dissociation curves.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Assessment of affinity-diverse anti-IgM MoAbs for potential to induce apoptosis in Ramos B cells.   Three antihuman IgM MoAbs, specific for the same or proximal epitopes on the Cµ2 domain of mIgM but differing significantly in binding affinity,30,33 were evaluated for their potential to induce the in vitro apoptosis of Ramos B cells, as assessed by a change in the annexin-binding properties of the cells after 42 hours of culture. In these cultures, the MoAb was present at a concentration of 10 µg/mL (MoAb:cell ratio of 2 µg/105 cells; Fig 1). Consistent with prior reports,10,31 Ramos cells were induced to undergo apoptosis upon culture with anti-IgM Ab. However, the relative degree of apoptosis varied considerably depending on the ligand tested. Whereas nearly all of the Ramos cells became brightly annexin-positive after culture with intermediate-affinity MoAb Mu53 (Fab' binding affinity of Ka = 2 × 107 mol/L-1), somewhat surprisingly, only a portion of the cells incubated with high-affinity MoAb HB57 (Ka = 5 × 108 mol/L-1) did so. Cultures incubated with low-affinity MoAb P24 (Ka = ~2 × 106 mol/L-1) did not become notably apoptotic. Additional studies with F(ab')2 fragments have shown a similar pattern of apoptosis (data not shown), indicating that the difference between MoAb HB57 and MoAb Mu53 does not reflect a differing capacity of the MoAb to coengage mIgM and Fcgamma RII (a molecule with negative regulatory effects on signal transduction through the mIg receptor complex).40 Assessment of apoptosis by monitoring nuclei with hypodiploid levels of DNA36 or cells with a change in light scatter properties41 also showed that MoAb Mu53 induces a greater frequency of apoptotic cells than MoAb HB57 (data not shown). Time course studies showed that, although mIgM-triggered annexin-positive cells could be observed as early as 30 minutes after exposure to MoAb Mu53, maximal apoptosis was observed at 24 to 36 hours of culture (Fig 2). The proportion of annexin-positive B cells in cultures containing the high-affinity MoAb HB57 was always substantially less than that containing the intermediate-affinity MoAb, even after more prolonged incubation up to 60 hours (Fig 2; data not shown). Thus, the diminished level of apoptosis observed in cultures exposed to high-affinity MoAb HB57 does not appear to reflect slower kinetics for mIgM-triggered apoptosis by this ligand.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Murine MoAb with diverse affinities for human mIgM (Cµ2) differ in capacity to induce apoptosis in Ramos B cells. Cells were incubated with MoAb HB57, MoAb Mu53, MoAb P24, or isotype control MOPC-21 (MoAb concentration of 10 µg/mL; MoAb:cell ratio = 2 µg/105 cells) for 42 hours before staining with FITC-annexin V and flow cytometric analysis. Apoptotic cells are indicated as those brightly positive for FITC-annexin V (see Materials and Methods). The intrinsic Fab' binding affinities (Ka) of MoAbs HB57, Mu53, and P24 for B-cell mIgM are 5 × 108, 2 × 107, and approximately 2 × 106 mol/L-1, respectively.30 When the gate for annexin-positivity in the above experiment was set at a FITC-annexin intensity of 25 (horizontal log scale), Ramos cells incubated with isotype control MOPC or anti-IgM MoAbs P24, Mu53, and HB57 exhibited 4%, 4%, 90%, and 22% annexin-positive cells, respectively. Results similar to those above have been obtained in 12 replicate experiments. The difference between the percentage of annexin-positive cells in HB57 versus Mu53-treated cultures in the 12 replicate experiments was highly significant (mean ± SD of 38.2 ± 12.2 and 80.0 ± 10.3, respectively; P < .0001). Furthermore, the differences in the percentage of annexin-positive cells in HB57- or Mu53-treated cultures as compared with MOPC-treated control cultures (16.1 ± 8.8) were also both highly significant (P < .001).


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Kinetics of anti-IgM-induced apoptosis in Ramos B cells. Cells were incubated for the varying time intervals in the presence of isotype control MOPC-21 (A through G), HB57 anti-IgM (H through N), or Mu53 anti-IgM (O through U) (10 µg/mL; MoAb:cell ratio = 2 µg/105 cells). Cultured cells were stained with FITC-annexin V and analyzed by flow cytometry as in Fig 1. The value shown in the upper right-hand corner of each histogram represents the percentage of cells that were brightly annexin-positive after each culture interval.

Figure 3 shows the relative degree of apoptosis (Fig 3A) and the relative degree of cell binding (Fig 3B) associated with various MoAb concentrations of high-affinity MoAb HB57 and intermediate-affinity MoAb Mu53 (MoAb:cell ratios of 0.04 µg/105 cells to 20 µg/105 cells). These experiments indicated (1) that the lower-binding anti-IgM MoAb Mu53 is superior to the high-binding anti-IgM MoAb HB57 at inducing apoptosis at all concentrations tested and (2) that maximal apoptosis by each ligand appears to occur at concentrations for maximal receptor occupancy by that MoAb.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Comparison of various concentrations of high-affinity MoAb HB57 and intermediate-affinity MoAb Mu53 for induction of apoptosis and binding to membrane IgM. (A) Apoptosis assay. Ramos B cells were cultured (22 to 24 hours) with the indicated concentrations of MoAb or medium alone before staining with FITC-annexin, as in Fig 1. The percentage of annexin-positive cells in medium cultures was subtracted from the percentage of annexin-positive cells in anti-IgM cultures to give triangle  percentage annexin-positive cells. The data shown represent the mean ± SD from two experiments. (B) Binding assay. Cells were exposed to the indicated concentrations of MoAb HB57, Mu53, or isotype control MOPC-21 for 5 minutes at 37°C, under conditions that prevent ligand internalization and capping (Materials and Methods). MoAb binding was detected by indirect immunofluorescence. The data are expressed as the MFI above the background noted with isotype control MOPC-21 (ie, triangle  MFI). Similar results to the binding experiment shown were obtained in an additional experiment performed at 37°C and in two experiments performed at 4°C. For both the apoptosis and the binding experiments, MoAb concentrations of 1, 10, and 100 µg/mL correspond to MoAb:cell ratios of 0.2 µg/105 cells, 2 µg/105 cells, and 20 µg/105 cells, respectively.

A more extensive panel of anti-IgM MoAb with differing anti-IgM domain specificities and affinities was evaluated, at a concentration of 10 µg/mL, for capacity to induce apoptosis as well as for binding to mIgM (Fig 4). (The MoAb:cell ratio for these experiments was 2 µg per 105 cells for the apoptosis assay and 1 µg per 105 cells for the binding assay.) These experiments further confirmed the observation that the MoAbs that were the best at binding mIgM, as determined by an indirect immunofluorescent assay with bivalent MoAb, were not the most effective at inducing apoptosis. Rather, the ligands that triggered the highest levels of apoptosis were those that exhibited an intermediate degree of binding to Ramos cells, ie, MoAb Mu18 and Mu53. (At this MoAb concentration, all of the ligands, with the exception of the lower-affinity MoAbs IG6, P24, and P19, exhibited plateau level binding [data not shown].)


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Comparison of the mIgM-binding and apoptosis-inducing properties of a large panel of bivalent anti-IgM MoAbs with differing intrinsic affinity and differing IgM domain specificity. The capacity of the bivalent MoAb to bind Ramos mIgM was assessed by indirect immunofluorescence following 30 minutes of incubation of Ramos cells with 10 µg/mL of MoAb at 4°C (MoAb:cell ratio = 1 µg/105 cells). Data are indicated as the MFI (). The MoAbs are listed (left to right) in descending order of their mIgM binding potential by this assay. With the notable exception of MoAb XG9, there was a relatively good correspondence between relative binding potential of the bivalent MoAb and the previously established Ka values for binding of MoAb Fab'.30 The capacity of these ligands to induce apoptosis was assessed by culturing Ramos cells with 10 µg/mL of each MoAb (MoAb:cell ratio = 2 µg/105 cells) for 42 hours and subsequent staining with FITC-annexin. The later results are shown as MFI FITC-annexin bound (bullet ) as well as the percentage of annexin-positive cells (open circle ); (mean ± SD from 2 experiments). A further replicate experiment in which all the MoAbs, with the exception of Mu18, were evaluated for MoAb binding or capacity to induce annexin-positive cells upon in vitro culture yielded similar results to those shown above.

Whereas the relative degree to which the seven bivalent anti-IgM MoAbs bound Ramos cells in the indirect immunofluorescence assay was generally in agreement with their Fab' intrinsic binding affinities for mIgM,30 this was not the case with MoAb XG9. Although previous equilibrium binding studies with MoAb Fab' fragments showed this latter Cµ1-specific MoAb to have an intrinsic affinity lower than that of MoAb HB57 (7 × 107 v 5 × 108 mol/L-1, respectively),30 bivalent MoAb XG9 bound Ramos to a greater degree than did bivalent MoAb HB57 in the indirect immunofluorescence assay. As will be discussed below, the greater binding of bivalent MoAb XG9 is probably, at least in part, attributed to the established propensity of this Cµ1-specific MoAb to bind in a monogamous fashion to mIgM, ie, both Fab binding sites on the XG9 MoAb engaged with both Fab epitopes on a single mIgM molecule.30 Others have discussed how such bivalent binding to two epitopes on the same molecule results in quite stable engagement, ie, provides a substantial avidity bonus.42 Hence, MoAb XG9 would less likely dissociate from mIgM during the washing procedures associated with the staining assay.

Assessment of affinity-diverse anti-Cµ2-specific MoAbs at inducing protein tyrosine phosphorylation in Ramos cells.   Although a tendency toward monogamous binding, and hence a lesser capacity to cross-link separate mIgM molecules, may explain the lesser capacity of high-affinity MoAb XG9 to induce apoptosis, the reason for the suboptimal apoptosis triggered by the high-affinity MoAb HB57 is less apparent. In an effort to gain further insight into why the high- and intermediate-affinity Cµ2-specific MoAbs affinity differ so substantially at triggering apoptosis, we have compared the relative capacity of these ligands to induce early protein tyrosine phosphorylation in Ramos cells. Such studies have the potential of showing whether the lowered effectiveness of the high-affinity MoAb at inducing apoptosis is due to a supraoptimal or suboptimal level of mIgM signal transduction or, alternatively, to a qualitatively different pattern of early tyrosine phosphorylation.

Ramos cells were stimulated for 1 or 5 minutes with the affinity-diverse Cµ2-specific MoAbs (HB57, Mu53, and P24) or isotype control MOPC-21 (MoAb concentration of 100 µg/mL; MoAb:cell ratio of 5 µg/105 cells). The degree of tyrosine phosphorylation of various cellular proteins was assessed after gel electrophoresis of lysates, Western blotting with HRP-conjugated anti-P(tyr) MoAb, and ECL. Our studies (data not shown) and those of others18,38 had shown that, at these time intervals, B cells typically exhibit maximal tyrosine phosphorylation of most proteins. The data in Fig 5 indicate that, as noted for apoptosis, the bivalent high-affinity anti-IgM MoAb HB57 was less effective than the intermediate-affinity MoAb Mu53 at triggering the early (1 and 5 minutes) tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple proteins in Ramos cells. No obvious qualitative differences were noted in the proteins that were tyrosine phosphorylated after MoAb HB57 or MoAb Mu53 engagement with B cells. Both MoAb HB57 and MoAb Mu53 were substantially more effective than low-affinity MoAb P24 in inducing tyrosine phosphorylation.


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Relative capacity of MoAb with high, intermediate, and low affinity for mIgM (Cµ2) to induce early protein tyrosine phosphorylation in Ramos B cells. Cells were incubated with high-affinity MoAb HB57, intermediate-affinity MoAb Mu53, low-affinity MoAb P24, or isotype control MOPC-21 at a concentration of 100 µg/mL (MoAb:cell ratio = 5 µg/105 cells) for 1 or 5 minutes before preparation of lysates and (A) analysis of lysates (20 µg protein) for tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins by SDS-PAGE, Western blotting with HRP-conjugated anti-P(tyr) Ab, and ECL, as described in Materials and Methods. A P(tyr)-positive control lysate (1:20 dilution) was run on both the 1- and 5-minutes lysate gels. The position of MW standards is shown on the left as approximate kilodaltons. The position and designation of several P(tyr) proteins that were densitometrically analyzed (as in Fig 6) is shown in the center as p137, p96, p78, and p60. (B) Blots were stripped and reanalyzed by Western blotting with rabbit anticatalase and HRP-conjugated goat antirabbit IgG and ECL, as described in Materials and Methods, as a control for the amount of loaded protein.

Several tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were selected for densitometric evaluation based on the fact that they were the most consistently resolvable in the multiple blots performed in replicate experiments. A densitometric evaluation of the intensity of the P(tyr) proteins designated as p137, p78, and p60 (based on their approximate MW in kilodaltons) showed that the high-affinity MoAb was less effective than the intermediate-affinity ligand at inducing the phosphorylation of these proteins in multiple experiments (Fig 6). A possible exception was in the case of the protein, p96, which in several experiments appeared to be phosphorylated to a more comparable degree by the high-affinity and intermediate-affinity ligands. We have not performed analyses to confirm the identity of p137, p96, p78, and p60. However, anti-P(tyr) immunoblotting of anti-phospholipase C-gamma 2 (PLC-gamma 2) immunoprecipitates of Ramos cells stimulated with MoAbs HB57, Mu53, P24, and MOPC-21 showed a more intense tyrosine phosphorylated band of approximately 137 kD in the immunoprecipitated lysate of MoAb Mu53-stimulated cells, under conditions in which reblotting with anti-PLC-gamma 2 showed comparable levels of PLC-gamma 2 at the same position in all immunoprecipitates (data not shown). This suggests that PLC-gamma 2 is one protein whose tyrosine phosphorylation is more effectively achieved by the intermediate-affinity MoAb.


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 6. Effect of anti-IgM MoAb affinity on potential to induce tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins designated as p137, p96, p78, and p60. Ramos B cells were stimulated for 1 or 5 minutes with the affinity-diverse anti-IgM MoAbs and the lysates analyzed as in Fig 5. The designated protein bands in the antiphosphotyrosine blots (eg, Fig 5) were densitometrically analyzed as detailed in Materials and Methods. The results are expressed as the percentage of the maximal anti-IgM-induced protein tyrosine phosphorylation observed for each protein at a given time point. The mean ± SD of the percentage of maximum values for three separate experiments is shown. The paired Student's t-test was used to evaluate whether the level of tyrosine phosphorylation of a given protein induced by MoAb HB57 (Ka = 55 × 107 mol/L-1) was significantly different from that induced by MoAb Mu53 (Ka = 2 × 107 mol/L-1). P (probability) values that approached or were less than P = .05 are indicated above the bars representing the response to MoAb HB57.

To discern whether the variability in the relative degree of protein tyrosine phosphorylation observed in the diverse experiments shown in Fig 6 might represent variability intrinsic to the assay (intraexperimental variability) or variability between stimulation experiments (interexperimental variability), we compared the relative degree of protein tyrosine phosphorylation observed when a set of lysates from a single Ramos stimulation experiment was assayed on three different occasions by gel electrophoresis, Western blotting, and ECL detection of P(tyr) proteins. The data in Fig 7A through D indicate that the replicate blots from a single set of lysates (1 minute of stimulation) exhibited greater uniformity than did blots from lysates derived from multiple Ramos stimulation experiments (Fig 6A through D). This suggests that the degree of variability in the effect of MoAb affinity on protein tyrosine phosphorylation in part reflects subtle differences in the Ramos cell population used for the different experiments. The nature of these differences is not known but may possibly reflect differences in the cell cycle stage of the majority of the cells and/or in the relative IgM density or rate of receptor diffusion at the time of testing.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 7. Intraexperimental variability in the degree of protein tyrosine phosphorylation. A set of lysates from one of the three stimulation experiments in Fig 6 was reassayed on different occasions by anti-P(tyr) immunoblotting and ECL. Bands were analyzed and plotted as in Fig 6. The tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins indicated as p78 and p60 were analyzed in three replicate assays with the same lysate. Data shown for p137 and p96 represent only two of the assays, due to problems in the clear resolution of p137 and p96 in one of the assays.

Components of the mIg signaling complex have been reported to associate with cytoskeletal elements after receptor cross-linking.43 To investigate whether the diminished tyrosine phosphorylation of detergent-soluble proteins in HB57-stimulated cells might be explained by an increased phosphorylation of proteins in the detergent-insoluble cytoskeleton, we evaluated the level of tyrosine phosphorylation evident in the Triton X-insoluble pellet. Whereas tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins of approximately 70 to 77 kD MW could be detected in these fractions at 1 and 5 minutes after stimulation with 100 µg/mL anti-IgM MoAb, these proteins were not phosphorylated to a greater degree in high-affinity MoAb HB57-stimulated cells than in intermediate-affinity MoAb Mu53-stimulated cells. Rather, the inverse was the case (data not shown), as noted for the detergent-soluble proteins (Figs 5 and 6).

Taken together, the available data indicate that the impaired capacity of a high-affinity bivalent anti-IgM MoAb to trigger apoptosis of Ramos B cells cannot be attributed to a supraoptimal level of mIgM signal transduction after ligand binding or to any obvious difference in the proteins that are tyrosine phosphorylated after MoAb engagement. Rather, the lowered capacity of the high-affinity ligand to induce apoptosis may correlate with a lowered capacity to induce signal transduction, as manifest by the overall degree of tyrosine phosphorylation observed after brief culture with high concentrations of MoAb.

Evidence that intermediate-affinity MoAb Mu53 induces a greater degree of receptor cross-linking than high-affinity MoAb HB57.   A lesser capacity of high-affinity ligands to induce mIgM signal transduction might reflect a diminished capacity of the high-affinity bivalent ligand to induce receptor cross-links at high, receptor-saturating concentrations. This hypothesis is supported by previous studies on the kinetics of univalent and bivalent engagement of MoAbs specific for other cell surface molecules.42,44-46 The latter studies have shown that, at high concentrations, high-affinity bivalent ligands will have a propensity for engaging stably via one binding site only (univalent binding), whereas lower-affinity ligands will more rapidly evolve into a state in which both binding sites are engaged with two surface molecules (bivalent bridge binding). We have attempted to experimentally address this through two types of experiments.

Firstly, we compared the extent to which the intermediate- and high-affinity Cµ2-specific MoAbs, Mu53 and HB57, induce mIgM patching and capping when incubated with Ramos cells for 15 minutes at 37°C (10 µg/mL MoAb; MoAb:cell ratio of 0.5 µg/105 cells). The summarized data in Table 1 indicate that, although MoAb HB57 was able to induce mIgM redistribution on Ramos B cells, it was significantly less effective at doing so than the intermediate-affinity MoAb Mu53. (Similar conclusions were reached in an additional experiment in which the MoAbs were tested at a higher concentration of 100 µg/mL [MoAb:cell ratio of 5 µg/105 cells].) Additionally, the Cµ1-specific MoAb XG9 was found to be impaired in capacity to induce mIgM cross-linking, as compared with MoAb Mu53.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Relative Capacity of MoAbs Mu53, HB57, and XG9 to Induce the Redistribution of mIgM on Ramos B Cells

The second test of the above-described hypothesis involved flow cytometric measurements of the dissociation rates of cell-bound FITC-conjugated F(ab')2 and Fab' fragments of MoAb HB57 and MoAb Mu53 in the presence of excess unlabeled MoAb (Fig 8). (FITC-labeled ligand was added at a MoAb protein:cell ratio of 5 µg/105 cells at ambient temperature.) Other studies have indicated that, in the presence of excess ligand, differences in the rate of dissociation of cell-bound labeled F(ab')2 and Fab' fragments should reflect the extent of univalent or bivalent binding to cell receptors.47-49 The competing unlabeled ligand prevents dissociated binding sites of the FITC-labeled Ab from re-engaging with their cellular epitopes; FITC-ligand bound through only one Fab' will relatively rapidly release from the cell, whereas ligand bound through both binding sites will release from the cell more slowly (due to the necessity for dissociation of two separate binding sites). The data in Fig 8 show that, whereas FITC-HB57 F(ab')2 and FITC-HB57 Fab' had comparable rates of dissociation, the dissociation of FITC-Mu53 F(ab')2 was substantially slower than that of monovalent FITC-Mu53 Fab'. This indeed suggests that, under these conditions, bivalent MoAb HB57 binds predominantly via one site (univalently), whereas bivalent MoAb Mu53 undergoes a substantial degree of bivalent engagement. In these experiments, the dissociation rate constant (k2)50 (mean ± SD of 3 experiments) for Mu53 Fab' (2.23 ± 0.25 × 10-3 [s-1]) was found to be only slightly faster than that for HB57 Fab' (1.81 ± 0.10 × 10-3 [s-1]) (P value by Student's t-test = .052). The substantially greater equilibrium binding constant (Ka) for HB57 Fab' versus Mu53 Fab'30 might be explained by temperature effects on Fab' dissociation50 or by a greater association rate for MoAb HB57 versus MoAb Mu53. These issues will require further experimentation.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 8. Dissociation of FITC-conjugated F(ab')2 and Fab' fragments of MoAb HB57 (A) or MoAb Mu53 (B) from Ramos cells in the presence or absence of excess unlabeled antibody. Cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated F(ab')2 (open circle , bullet ) or Fab' (triangle , black-triangle) fragments of high-affinity MoAb HB57 (A) or intermediate affinity Mu53 (B) (16.5 µg/mL; MoAb:cell ratio equal to that used for tyrosine phosphorylation experiment in Fig 5, ie, 5 µg/105 cells) for 5 minutes before addition of an excess of unlabeled MoAb HB57 diluted in sheath fluid or the addition of sheath fluid alone, as described in Materials and Methods. Flow cytometric analysis of the level of FITC-fluorescence was begun immediately after the addition of sheath fluid with or without unlabeled protein, using time as a parameter, for a total of 560 seconds. The amount of specific fluorescence at each 80-second time interval (t = x) was determined as described in Materials and Methods and is plotted above as a ratio of the specific fluorescence during each time interval relative to the specific fluorescence noted in the same tube at t = 0 to 20 seconds (ie, t = 0). At this latter time interval, there was no notable difference between the engagement of ligand to cells with or without unconjugated MoAb present (data not shown).

High-affinity MoAb HB57 prevents apoptosis triggered by intermediate-affinity MoAb Mu53.   As indicated in the above-described dissociation experiments and elsewhere,33 MoAb HB57 can very effectively inhibit the binding of Mu53 to its proximal Cµ2 epitope.33 One might therefore predict that, if the greater capacity of MoAb Mu53 to induce apoptosis were due to a greater capacity to induce cross-linking of mIgM, the addition of saturating concentrations of the high-affinity MoAb HB57 to cultures containing MoAb Mu53 would ablate the ability of MoAb Mu53 to induce apoptosis. Consistent with these expectations, we observed that the presence of 10 to 100 µg/mL concentrations of MoAb HB57 significantly abrogated the capacity of similar concentrations of MoAb Mu53 to induce apoptosis (Table 2).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. High-Affinity MoAb HB57 Can Prevent the Enhanced Degree of Ramos Apoptosis Induced by Intermediate-Affinity MoAb Mu53

An enhancement in the mIgM cross-linking capacity of high-affinity anti-IgM MoAb can reverse the impairment in triggering apoptosis.   We examined whether efforts to enhance the cross-linking potential of a high-affinity ligand would substantially enhance its efficacy at triggering apoptosis. This involved testing the capacity of MoAb HB57 and MoAb Mu53 to induce apoptosis as multivalent MoAb:dextran conjugates. The data in Fig 9 shows that the multivalent form of MoAb HB57 was as effective as the multivalent form of MoAb Mu53 at inducing Ramos apoptosis at a concentration (ie, 10 µg/mL) at which the bivalent forms of the two MoAbs were significantly different at inducing apoptosis. The findings given above are in agreement with the studies of Chaouchi et al10 and Marches et al18 using Ramos and Daudi cells, respectively, which had shown that secondary cross-linking Ab could increase the degree of protein tyrosine phosphorylation elicited by MoAb DA4.4 (HB57) as well as facilitate apoptosis by this MoAb. Additional studies in this laboratory with Ramos cells have shown that the addition of a secondary cross-linking Ab to MoAb HB57-containing cultures results in levels of apoptosis equivalent to that in MoAb Mu53-containing cultures (data not shown).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 9. The impaired capacity of high-affinity MoAb to induce apoptosis is not observed under conditions of ligand multivalency. Cells were cultured for 42 hours with bivalent forms of high-affinity MoAb HB57, intermediate-affinity MoAb Mu53, or isotype control MOPC-21 or with multivalent MoAb:dextran conjugates of MoAb HB57, MoAb Mu53, or MOPC-21 (as HB57:UPC:dextran, Mu53:UPC:dextran, and MOPC-21:UPC:dextran; see Materials and Methods) at a concentration of 10 µg/mL MoAb protein per culture (MoAb:cell ratio = 2 µg/105 cells). Apoptosis was assessed by FITC-annexin V binding as in Fig 1. The results represent the mean percentage of annexin-positive cells in two experiments ± SEM.

High-affinity anti-IgM MoAb is not impaired in capacity to induce early protein tyrosine phosphorylation at less saturating ligand concentrations.   Although bivalent, high-affinity MoAbs can be compromised in capacity to form cross-links at high saturating ligand concentrations,42,44-46 this is not expected at subsaturating concentrations of ligand. Under the latter conditions, a greater proportion of free receptor molecules should increase the likelihood that the bivalent MoAb can engage both its binding sites and hence bridge IgM molecules. One might thus expect a lesser disparity between MoAb HB57 and MoAb Mu53 at initiating cross-link-dependent signaling events at low MoAb concentrations. Consistent with these expectations, we did observe an enhancement in the capacity of high-affinity anti-IgM to induce early protein tyrosine phosphorylation when the concentration was lowered from 100 to 10 µg/mL (5 µg per 105 cells v 0.5 µg per 105 cells, respectively). Thus, as the concentration of ligand diminished, the high-affinity MoAb was no longer impaired, relative to the intermediate-affinity MoAb, in capacity to induce the rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of most proteins (Figs 10 and 11); indeed, in occasional experiments, MoAb HB57 was more effective than MoAb Mu53 at inducing protein tyrosine phosphorylation at the lower MoAb:cell ratio (eg, Fig 10). Furthermore, whereas intermediate-affinity MoAb Mu53 generally induced the greatest level of tyrosine phosphorylation at a concentration of 100 µg/mL, the greatest level of MoAb HB57-induced tyrosine phosphorylation was more typically noted at the lower concentration of 10 µg/mL (Fig 11). Interestingly, despite the effectiveness of the high-affinity MoAb at inducing early protein tyrosine phosphorylation at the lower ligand concentrations, we did not observe an enhancement in the apoptosis-inducing potential of the high-affinity MoAb at low subsaturating concentrations (Fig 3).


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 10. Protein tyrosine phosphorylation in Ramos B cells after 1 minute of incubation with various concentrations of high- or intermediate-affinity anti-IgM. Ramos cells were incubated for 1 minute with the indicated concentrations of high-affinity MoAb HB57, intermediate-affinity MoAb Mu53, or isotype control MOPC-21 (100 µg/mL = MoAb:cell ratio of 5 µg/105 cells; 10 µg/mL = 0.5 µg/105 cells; 1 µg/mL = 0.05 µg/105 cells). (A) Tyrosine-phosphorylated protein was assayed as described in Fig 5, with the exception that 5 µg of lysate was loaded per lane. (B) Blots were stripped and reblotted with anticatalase as described in Fig 5.