|
|
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Blood, Vol. 93 No. 1 (January 1), 1999:
pp. 25-33
RAPID COMMUNICATION
Inhibition of Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cell Proliferation by
the CXC Chemokine, Platelet Factor 4 (PF4), Is Associated With
Impaired Downregulation of p21Cip1/WAF1
By
Grazia Gentilini,
Nancy E. Kirschbaum,
James A. Augustine,
Richard
H. Aster, and
Gian Paolo Visentin
From the Blood Research Institute, The Blood Center of Southeastern
Wisconsin and the Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Medical
College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
 |
ABSTRACT |
Human PF4 is a heparin-binding chemokine known to be capable of
inhibiting endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis. To explore
the biological mechanisms responsible for this action, we investigated
the effect of PF4 on epidermal growth factor (EGF)-stimulated human
umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC), a model system in which
stimulation is essentially independent of interaction with cell-surface
glycosaminoglycans. Based on previous findings that PF4 blocks
endothelial cell cycle entry and progression into S phase, we studied
the molecular mechanism(s) of PF4 interference with cell cycle
machinery. PF4 treatment of EGF-stimulated HUVEC caused a decrease in
cyclin E-cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (cdk2) activity with resulting
attenuation of retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation. PF4-dependent
downregulation of cyclin E-cdk2 activity was associated with increased
binding of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor,
p21Cip1/WAF1, to the cyclin E-cdk2 complex. Analysis of
total cellular p21Cip1/WAF1 showed that in the presence of
PF4, p21Cip1/WAF1 levels were sustained at time points when
p21Cip1/WAF1 was no longer detectable in cells stimulated
by EGF in the absence of PF4. These findings indicate that PF4
inhibition of HUVEC proliferation in response to EGF is associated with
impaired downregulation of p21Cip1/WAF1 and provide the
first evidence for interference with cell cycle mechanisms by a
chemokine.
© 1999 by The American Society of Hematology.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
HUMAN PLATELET factor four (PF4), a
heparin-binding protein contained in platelet -granules, is secreted
upon activation of platelets. Structurally, human PF4 is a symmetrical,
tetrameric molecule made up of four identical subunits, each containing
70 amino acid residues. PF4 is a member of the chemokine family, a
group of homologous proteins1,2 separated into four
branches, designated CXXXC, CXC, CC, and C, based on the relative
position of the first two conserved cysteines. Although its structure
places it among the members of the CXC family of chemokines, PF4 does not share certain proinflammatory properties of other CXC family members because it is missing a critical N-terminal GLU-LEU-ARG sequence, the "ELR motif," which precedes the first cysteine
residue. In addition, PF4 has not been shown to bind to any
characterized chemokine receptor in mammals, with the possible
exception of the Duffy antigen.3
The high affinity of PF4 for heparin and heparan sulfate4-6
and its competition with antithrombin III (ATIII) for binding to
heparan sulfate on the endothelial surface7-9 has provided the basis for a postulated role of this chemokine in the regulation of
hemostasis as a procoagulant. However, a recent report has suggested an
anticoagulant role for PF4 as a cofactor in the generation of activated
protein C by the thrombin-thrombomodulin complex.10 A role
for PF4 as a regulator of hemostasis deserves serious consideration because its glycosaminoglycan (GAG) binding properties, coupled with
its release from activated platelets, leads to concentration of PF4 on
the endothelial surface at sites of vessel injury where effective
hemostasis is needed.
In the last decade, several reports have identified PF4 as an inhibitor
of both angiogenesis11,12 and hematopoietic progenitor cell
proliferation.13,14 Because angiogenesis is critical for tumor growth,15 characterization of naturally occurring
angiostatic factors, virtually free of drug-resistance
phenomena,16 has become an important focus of cancer
research. In vivo studies conducted in several animal models have
characterized PF4 as an inhibitor of murine melanoma and human colon
carcinoma tumor growth and metastasis.17-20 However, in
vitro studies have shown that although PF4 was unable to inhibit
proliferation of cultured melanoma or colon carcinoma cell lines, this
chemokine could inhibit cultured endothelial cell
proliferation,18 leading to the conclusion that PF4
antiproliferative action on the endothelium was responsible for the
tumor suppression. At present, clinical trials are being conducted with
several angiostatic drugs, including PF4.21 The observations cited above, together with in vivo evidence in animal models demonstrating the preferential binding of PF4 to the endothelium of regenerating vessels,22 suggest a physiologic role for
PF4 as a regulator of angiogenesis.15,23
The mechanism by which PF4 inhibits endothelial cell proliferation is
unknown. Gupta and Singh24 have reported that PF4 blocks
endothelial cell cycle entry and progression into S phase, suggesting that its antiproliferative action may involve direct interference with the cell cycle machinery. Cell proliferation is
achieved through a complex and ordered sequence of events controlled by
cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks), a group of related serine/threonine kinases whose activation depends on their association with protein subunits, the cyclins, and regulatory phosphorylation.25
Each phase of the cell cycle is characterized by a unique pattern of cdk activity. Under the influence of mitogens, progression in early
G1 depends on the activity of cyclin D-cdk4/6. The main substrate for cyclin D-cdk4/6 is the retinoblastoma protein (pRb), the
product of a tumor suppressor gene. In late G1,
phosphorylation of pRb is completed by cyclin E-cdk2. Activation of
cyclin D- and cyclin E-associated kinases, and consequent
hyperphosphorylation of pRb, may constitute the molecular events that
take a proliferating cell over the biological threshold between
mitogen-dependent and -independent stages of the G1 phase
(restriction point or "R point"). Passage through the R point is
required for cellular commitment to the remainder of the growth cycle,
unless DNA damage or metabolic disturbances occur.26-29 pRb
in its hypophosphorylated active form binds to and inhibits the
activity of the E2F family of transcription factors. E2F proteins
released from hyperphosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (ppRb) promote
transcription of a number of genes with key roles for progression into
S phase.26-28
Cyclin-cdk activity is tightly regulated because of its central
importance in cell cycle progression. Regulatory mechanisms include:
variations in the cyclin levels,29-31 phosphorylation status of the kinase subunit,25 and the action of specific
inhibitors, the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors
(CKIs).32 Two classes of CKIs have been defined according
to structural homology. The INK4 (p15, p16, p18, p19) family is
specific for cdk4/6; the Cip-Kip (p21, p27, p57) family contains
universal inhibitors of all cyclin-cdk pairs. A large body of evidence
is accumulating which supports the idea that certain regulators of cell
proliferation modulate cyclin-cdk activity by affecting CKI expression.
In particular, transforming growth factor- (TGF- ) and
interferons- and - , whose activities extend to endothelial cells,
have been reported to upregulate p27Kip1 and/or
p21Cip1/WAF1 levels33-35 with
consequent inhibition of pRb phosphorylation.
p21Cip1/WAF1 was originally cloned and characterized both
as a cdk-binding inhibitor of cdk kinase activity36 and a
p53-inducible inhibitor of tumor growth.37
p21Cip1/WAF1 was reported to inhibit growth by blocking
cells in the G1 phase in a p53-dependent response to DNA
damaging agents.38-40 However, its ability to inhibit the
cell cycle in a p53-independent manner has also been shown in several
recent reports.41,42 p21Cip1/WAF1 has also been
shown to inhibit DNA replication, but not repair, by binding to
proliferating-cell nuclear antigen (PCNA).43
In this report, we describe studies of the mechanism by which PF4
inhibits the proliferation of mitogen-stimulated human umbilical vein
endothelial cells (HUVEC). Epidermal growth factor (EGF) instead of
basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) was chosen to exclude possible
GAG-dependent interference of PF4 with mitogen-receptor interactions.
Here we report that PF4 inhibits cell cycle progression by preventing
the downregulation of p21Cip1/WAF1, with consequent
inhibition of cyclinE-cdk2 activity and pRb phosphorylation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Chemicals and reagents.
These were obtained from the following sources: recombinant human bFGF
and EGF from R&D Systems Inc (Minneapolis, MN);
[methyl-3H]-thymidine (37 MBq/mL) and
[ 32P]ATP (370 MBq/mL) from NEN Inc (Boston, MA);
heparin derived from porcine intestinal mucosa (10,000 IU/mL, specific
activity: 176 IU/mg) and protamine sulfate (10 mg/mL) from Elkins-Sinn, ESI Pharmaceuticals (Cherry Hill, NJ); human PF4, either isolated from
human platelets or expressed as a recombinant protein, was purified in
our laboratory as previously described,44,45 the specific
cDNA encoding human PF4 was a gift from Dr Mortimer Poncz (University
of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia); rabbit IgG anti-pRb, mouse monoclonal
IgG antibodies to cdk2, cyclin E, p53, agarose beads conjugated with
rabbit IgG anti-cdk2, and the glutathione S-transferase-fused murine
pRb (GST-Rb, amino acid residues 769-921) from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc (Santa Cruz, CA); mouse monoclonal antibodies to
p21Cip1/WAF1 and p27Kip1 from Transduction
Laboratories (Lexington, KY); RPMI-1640 medium, EDTA, ethylene glycol
bis-( aminoethyl ether) N,N,N ,N -tetraacetic acid (EGTA), NaF,
NaVO4, leupeptin, aprotinin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride
(PMSF), 3-cyclohexylamino-1-propanesulfonic acid (CAPS), Tween-20,
Triton X-100, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) from Sigma Chemical Co (St
Louis, MO); okadaic acid from Calbiochem-Novabiochem (La Jolla, CA),
Immobilon-P, polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) transfer membrane from
Millipore Co (Bedford, MA); fetal bovine serum (FBS) and horse serum
from HyClone Laboratories Inc (Logan, UT); sodium dodecyl sulfate
(SDS), acrylamide, N,N -methylene-bisacrylamide, and Tris from Bio-Rad
Laboratories (Richmond, CA); Super Signal Ultra chemiluminescent
substrate and bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay from Pierce (Rockford,
IL); enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system from Amersham Co
(Arlington Heights, IL); peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and
anti-mouse IgG from Jackson Immunoresearch (West Grove, PA). All other
chemicals were reagent grade.
HUVEC culture and stimulation.
Endothelial cells were isolated from human umbilical veins by
collagenase digestion and were cultured46,47 by the
Endothelial Cell Biology Core Laboratory of the Blood Research
Institute (Milwaukee, WI). The cells were grown to confluence in T75
flasks (Corning, Corning, NY), coated with 2% gelatin, in RPMI-1640
medium supplemented with 15% horse serum, 100 µg/mL endothelial cell
growth supplement (ECGS; Collaborative Research Inc, Lexington, MA),
100 µg/mL heparin, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin
(Sigma Chemical Co). Cell cultures were incubated at 37°C in a
water-saturated atmosphere of 95% air-5% CO2, and were
used at the third passage. To synchronize the cells in a quiescent
state (G0), the cells were cultured in "starvation
medium" (RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 1% horse serum, 0.25%
BSA) for 20 to 24 hours and were then stimulated with either EGF (20 ng/mL) alone or EGF (20 ng/mL) and PF4 (2 µg/mL) in "stimulation
medium" (RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 2.5% FBS).
DNA synthesis.
DNA synthesis was assessed by the level of thymidine (TdR)
incorporation. Cells, 3 × 103, were seeded in 96-well
plates (Corning), coated with 2% gelatin, and cultured to confluence
in growth medium. The cells were washed in "starvation medium"
and were then incubated in the same medium for 24 hours to synchronize
the cells in G0 phase. The cells were labeled with 37 kBq/mL [3H]TdR in "stimulation medium" and then
stimulated with either EGF (20 ng/mL) alone or EGF (20 ng/mL) and PF4
(2 µg/mL) in the same medium for 20 hours. Alternatively, bFGF at 2 ng/mL was used instead of EGF. For the experiment shown in Fig
1A, EGF was used at concentrations ranging
from 20 to 200 ng/mL, bFGF from 1 to 10 ng/mL, and PF4 from 0.2 to 10 µg/mL. The medium was discarded, the cells were obtained using a
FilterMate 196 harvester (Packard Co, Meriden, CT), and radioactivity
was measured using a Matrix 9600 (Packard) gas scintillation
-counter. Assays were performed in triplicate. [3H]TdR
incorporation, determined in starving cells, was considered background
and was subtracted from the value obtained in growth factor-stimulated
cells. Background values were always less than 10% of the values
obtained with growth factor stimulation.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 1.
(A) PF4 dose-dependently inhibits bFGF- (left) and
EGF-induced (right) DNA synthesis in endothelial cells. HUVEC were
plated in 96-well dishes as described in Materials and Methods. After
reaching confluence they were kept in starvation medium for 24 hours,
then stimulated with growth factor in the presence of the indicated
concentrations of PF4. [3H]-thymidine incorporation was
evaluated after 20 hours and was expressed as a percent of the maximum
incorporation achieved with the highest dose of growth factor in the
absence of PF4 (ordinate). Data shown are mean values ± SE of three
independent experiments performed in triplicate. (B) Heparin and
protamine inhibit bFGF- but not EGF-stimulated proliferation of HUVEC.
HUVEC were treated as in (A), except that bFGF was used at 2 ng/mL, EGF
at 20 ng/mL, and PF4 at 2 µg/mL, in the presence of the indicated
concentrations of heparin (H) or protamine. Data are expressed as a
percent of the maximum incorporation achieved with the highest dose of
growth factor in the absence of PF4 (ordinate), and are mean values ± SE of three independent experiments performed in triplicate.
|
|
In preliminary experiments, using these assay conditions, we determined
that recombinant human PF4 is indistinguishable from human PF4 isolated
from platelets in respect to its effects on mitogen-stimulated HUVEC.
All subsequent experiments were performed using human recombinant PF4.
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting.
To prepare cdk2 immunoprecipitates, 6 × 106 cells, washed
twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS: 0.02 mol/L
phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 0.145 mol/L NaCl), were lysed in 0.5 mL of
"lysis buffer" (0.05 mol/L Tris pH 8.0, 0.150 mol/L NaCl, 1%
Triton X-100, 0.1 mol/L NaF, 0.0025 mol/L EGTA, 0.001 mol/L EDTA,
0.0014 mol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF], 0.001 mol/L
NaVO4, 1 µg/mL aprotinin, 0.5 µg/mL leupeptin, 0.2 µg/mL okadaic acid). Protein concentration was determined by the
bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay. Four hundred micrograms of total
protein lysate diluted in "immunoprecipitation buffer" (lysis
buffer without okadaic acid) to a final volume of 1 mL was incubated
for 1 hour on ice with 50 µL of a 50% suspension of agarose beads
conjugated with nonimmune rabbit IgG (preclearing), followed by
centrifugation to remove beads. The supernatant was incubated for 1 more hour on ice with 50 µL of a 50% suspension of agarose beads
conjugated with rabbit IgG anti-human cdk2. To reduce nonspecific
binding, the beads were preincubated for 1 hour in immunoprecipitation
buffer containing 3% BSA. After six washes with immunoprecipitation
buffer, adsorbed proteins were dissociated by boiling in 1×
SDS-sample loading buffer (0.05 mol/L Tris/HCl pH 6.8, 10% glycerol,
1% SDS, 0.02% bromphenol blue, and 5% -mercaptoethanol),
fractionated by 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE),
and electroblotted (0.01 mol/L CAPS, 10% methanol, pH 11) onto a PVDF
membrane. After blocking of nonspecific binding (blocking buffer: 0.02 mol/L Tris pH 7.8, 0.145 mol/L NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20, 20% FBS), the
membrane was immunoblotted (0.02 mol/L Tris pH 7.8, 0.145 mol/L NaCl,
0.05% Tween-20) with the indicated antibodies. Secondary antibodies
(horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG)
were visualized using the Super Signal Ultra (Pierce) or ECL (Amersham)
chemiluminescent substrates. Immunoblotting of total protein was
performed as described above, but only 50 µg of total protein diluted
in 2× SDS-sample loading buffer was loaded per lane. In preliminary
experiments, equal protein loading was assessed by Coomassie staining
of the blotted membrane. Discontinuous 12.5% SDS-PAGE was used in all cases except for pRb analysis, where a 5% to 8.5% SDS-PAGE gradient gel was chosen. Immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analyses were performed for each of three (or more) independent, but identical experiments and demonstrated reproducibility of results.
Cyclin-dependent kinase assay.
To measure the activity of cdk2, a glutathione S-transferase-fused
murine pRb fragment (GST-Rb) was used as substrate. The cdk2
immunoprecipitate was suspended in 50 µL of 0.02 mol/L Tris/HCl (pH
7.4) containing 0.01 mol/L MgCl2, 0.001 mol/L
dithiotreitol, 50 µmol/L [ 32P]ATP/ATP, and 20 µg/mL GST-Rb. This mixture was incubated for 30 minutes at 30°C
with occasional mixing. The reaction was terminated by adding an equal
volume of 2× SDS-sample loading buffer. Samples were then centrifuged
to remove the agarose beads and the supernatant was boiled for 5 minutes and fractionated by 10% SDS-PAGE. Phosphorylated proteins were
visualized by autoradiography and incorporated radioactivity was
quantified directly on the dried gel with an AMBIS (Automated MicroBiological Imaging System) computerized imaging/radio scanning 4000 system (CSP Inc, Billerica, MA).
 |
RESULTS |
PF4 inhibits HUVEC proliferation induced by either bFGF or EGF.
Figure 1A illustrates the ability of two mitogens, bFGF and EGF, to
stimulate, in a dose-dependent manner, DNA synthesis in cultured HUVEC
as estimated by [3H]thymidine incorporation. Although
bFGF and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have been reported
to be the most potent endothelial cell mitogens, EGF, albeit at a
10-fold higher concentration, stimulated endothelial cell DNA synthesis
as well as bFGF. PF4 effectively inhibited the action of both mitogens
in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 1A).
EGF-induced HUVEC proliferation is glycosaminoglycan-independent.
bFGF, like PF4, is a heparin-binding protein and the interaction of
bFGF with cell-surface GAGs is required for its mitogenic action.48 In agreement with other
investigators,23,49,50 we found that heparin
dose-dependently inhibits bFGF-induced DNA synthesis and that further
inhibition is achieved by adding PF4 (Fig 1B). This finding is
consistent with a possible synergistic action by both heparin and PF4
to inhibit bFGF dimerization and to displace bFGF from its cell-surface
receptor.51 Protamine, a positively charged protein known
to bind to GAGs,48-50 also inhibited bFGF-induced DNA
synthesis (Fig 1B), supporting the view that bFGF can be inhibited by
competing for its binding to cell-surface GAGs. In contrast, GAGs do
not act as cofactors in EGF-dependent stimulation of cell
growth.52 As shown in Fig 1B, neither heparin nor protamine
alone affected EGF-induced DNA synthesis; however, PF4 inhibited DNA
synthesis to the same extent whether or not heparin was present. The
data in Fig 1B and our finding that PF4 fails to block EGF-stimulated
MAP kinase signaling as reflected by phosphorylation of
p44ERK and p42ERK (data not shown) indicate
that PF4 does not interfere with the binding of EGF to its receptor or
with the initiation of EGF signaling. Therefore, we chose
EGF-stimulated endothelial cells as a model for further investigation
of the angiostatic effect of PF4.
PF4 inhibits EGF-induced hyperphosphorylation of pRb.
As already noted, a necessary step in G1 progression is the
phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein by specific cyclin-cdk pairs. Therefore, we investigated the time-dependent accumulation of
ppRb in HUVEC stimulated by EGF in the presence and absence of 2 µg/mL PF4. On the basis of its delayed mobility shift in SDS-PAGE,
ppRb (114 kD) can be readily separated from pRb (110 kD)53,54 and detected by immunoblotting. As shown in Fig
2, there was significant accumulation of
ppRb in cells stimulated by EGF for 15 hours. In the presence of PF4,
however, this accumulation was impaired.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 2.
PF4 attenuates EGF-induced pRb phosphorylation. HUVEC
lysates, collected at the specified times after stimulation with 20 ng/mL EGF in the absence ( ) or presence (+) of 2 µg/mL PF4, were
separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for pRb as described in
Materials and Methods. Results shown are representative of three
independent experiments.
|
|
PF4 prevents downregulation of the CKI p21Cip1/WAF1 and
enhances its association with cdk2 in EGF-stimulated HUVEC.
In G1, pRb must be phosphorylated sequentially by
cyclin-cdk pairs, cyclin D-cdk4/6 (early G1) and cyclin
E-cdk2 (late G1),55 to achieve the
hyperphosphorylated state necessary for G1/S transition. We
immunoprecipitated cdk2 from lysates of HUVEC stimulated for 15 hours with EGF in the presence or absence of 2 µg/mL PF4 and assayed the precipitates for cdk2-associated kinase activity. The
15-hour time point was chosen because in preliminary experiments we
observed an increase of cdk2-associated kinase activity beginning after
9 hours and peaking at 15 hours from the time HUVECs were induced with
EGF (data not shown). Figure 3A shows that
cdk2 immunoprecipitated from extracts of PF4-treated cells was much
less effective in phosphorylating GST-Rb than cdk2 immunoprecipitated
from PF4-untreated cells. Quantification of cdk2 kinase activity showed
that the level in PF4-treated cells was about half that of cells
treated with EGF alone. Inhibition of cdk2 kinase activity was also
achieved with 10 ng/mL rapamycin (data not shown), a known inhibitor of cyclin-cdk activity.56,57 To determine whether cdk2
activity levels correlated with the amount of cdk2 protein, the cdk2
immunoprecipitates used for kinase activity assays were assayed for
cdk2 protein levels by immunoblotting. Figure 3B indicates that cdk2
protein levels were essentially the same in the absence as in the
presence of PF4. Because cyclin E is a necessary cofactor for cdk2
activity in G1 phase, we evaluated the amount of
cdk2-associated cyclin E in the extracts used for kinase assays. Figure
3C shows that PF4 did not affect the amount of cyclin E associated with
cdk2. These findings indicate that loss of cdk2 activity associated with PF4 treatment is due to inhibition of function rather than to
reduction of cdk2 or cyclin E protein levels.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 3.
Enhanced association of cdk2 with
p21Cip1/WAF1 occurs in EGF-stimulated HUVEC
treated with PF4. (A) Immunoprecipitated cdk2, from HUVEC lysate,
collected 15 hours after EGF stimulation in the absence ( ) or
presence (+) of 2 µg/mL PF4, was assayed with GST-pRB in the
presence of [ 32P]ATP/ATP as described in Materials and
Methods. Phosphorylated GST-pRb was then analyzed by SDS-PAGE and
autoradiography and was quantified with an AMBIS scanner. (B) cdk2
levels in aliquots of the samples used to generate the results shown in
panel (A), were determined by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. (C) The
quantity of cyclin E immunoprecipitated with cdk2 was determined by
SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblot analysis. (D) p21Cip1/WAF1
associated with cdk2 was similarly assayed. The results shown are
representative of three independent experiments.
|
|
Cyclin-cdk activity can be modulated by specific CKIs, that bind
directly to cyclin-cdk pairs to inhibit their activity.
p21Cip1/WAF1, a CKI capable of inhibiting all cyclin-cdk
pairs, has been shown by in vitro studies to likely have higher
affinity for cyclin E-cdk2 than other cyclin-cdk pairs.39
Therefore, we determined whether PF4 could affect the amount of
p21Cip1/WAF1 associated with cyclin E-cdk2. Immunoblot
analysis for p21Cip1/WAF1, from the same
immunoprecipitates used to determine cdk2-associated kinase activity,
showed that the level of cdk2-associated p21Cip1/WAF1 was
significantly higher in EGF-stimulated cells treated with PF4 than in
cells incubated without PF4 (Fig 3D). The levels of p21Cip1/WAF1 associated with cdk2 were not appreciably
affected by PF4 at early time points, but began to increase relative to
control at 9 hours (data not shown), the time at which cyclin E-cdk 2 activity becomes detectable. Serial studies of the time-dependent
accumulation of total cellular p21Cip1/WAF1 in
EGF-stimulated HUVEC incubated with or without PF4 showed persistence
of p21Cip1/WAF1 levels over the course of 15 hours in the
presence but not in the absence of PF4 (Fig
4). This effect of PF4 was specific for p21Cip1/WAF1 because the cellular content of
p27Kip1, another CKI inhibitory toward cyclin E-cdk2, was
not altered either in the presence and absence of PF4 (data not shown).
Moreover, p21Cip1/WAF1 levels were independent of p53
expression which did not change during the period of observation (data
not shown). Together, these findings indicate that PF4 inhibits cell
cycle progression into S phase by sustaining high levels of
p21Cip1/WAF1 which, in turn, inhibit cyclin E-cdk2 activity
and, consequently, pRb phosphorylation.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 4.
PF4 prevents p21Cip1/WAF1 downregulation in
HUVEC stimulated by EGF. HUVEC lysates collected at the specified times
following EGF (20 ng/mL) stimulation with (+) or without ( ) 2 µg/mL PF4 were separated by SDS-PAGE and p21Cip1/WAF1 was
immunoblotted. Results shown are representative of three independent
experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The goal of these studies was to obtain clues to the mechanism by which
PF4 exerts its antiproliferative effect on mitogen-stimulated HUVEC. We
chose EGF, a mitogen whose action is independent of GAG, for HUVEC
stimulation to eliminate the possibility that inhibition by PF4 might
simply be the result of displacement by PF4 of mitogen from GAG, an
interaction known to be important for bFGF function.48 We
confirmed this phenomenon by showing dose-dependent inhibition of
bFGF-induced cell proliferation by PF4, heparin, and the highly cationic protein, protamine (Fig 1). Heparin and protamine exert this
effect by binding to bFGF and cell-surface GAGs respectively, thus
interfering with bFGF-receptor interaction as shown previously by
several groups.24,58-61
Although bFGF is not an ideal mitogen for studying inhibition of cell
proliferation by PF4 because of its dependence on GAG, Maione et
al18 obtained evidence that PF4 might act to inhibit proliferation by a mechanism independent of GAG by showing that recombinant PF4, modified to delete the major heparin-binding site,
retained inhibitory activity. We found that HUVEC proliferation induced
by the GAG-independent mitogen EGF was unaffected by heparin and by
protamine (Fig 1B), but was inhibited by PF4 in a dose-dependent manner
(Fig 1A). Moreover, PF4 failed to block EGF-stimulated MAP kinase
signaling, indicating that it does not interfere with the binding of
EGF to its cell-surface receptor. These findings are consistent with
the possibility that the inhibitory effect of PF4 is exerted through a
specific receptor not yet characterized. Alternatively the inhibitory
signal could be delivered directly through GAG and their associated
protein core.
The transit of proliferating cells through the cell cycle is tightly
regulated by various mitogenic and antimitogenic
signals.25,32 We examined the possibility that the
antimitogenic effect of PF4 is related to regulation of cdk activity in
G1. Our findings indicate that the inhibitory effect of PF4
is related to inhibition of cdk2 activity (Fig 3) with resulting
failure to phosphorylate the retinoblastoma protein (Fig 2). Reduced
cdk2 activity, in turn, appears to result from persistence of the
universal CKI, p21Cip1/WAF1 (Figs 3 and 4). These
observations provide the first evidence for interference by a chemokine
with key regulators of the cell cycle machinery. Future studies are
needed to directly link the action of PF4 to the regulation of
p21Cip1/WAF1 levels. The inhibitory action of antimitogens,
TGF- ,33,62 and interferons- / 34 has
recently been studied and appears to be related to regulation of cdk
activity in G1 by upregulation of specific CKIs. The effect
of PF4 on p21Cip1/WAF1 appears to be specific, because
there was no change in the cellular content of another CKI,
p27Kip1. Sustained levels of p21Cip1/WAF1
during growth factor stimulation could be mediated by various mechanisms: decreased protein degradation, increased mRNA production, increased mRNA translation rate, or increased mRNA half-life. p21Cip1/WAF1 mRNA contains three AUUUA
sequences36,37 in its 3 untranslated region. Such
sequences contained within A-U rich elements (ARE) are thought to serve
as mRNA destabilizing elements that trigger rapid degradation of the
messenger, and are typically present in the transcripts of cytokines,
oncoproteins, and transcription factors. mRNA stabilization may be
correlated with its association to specific RNA-binding
proteins.63 Upregulation of
p21Cip1/WAF1 protein levels through mRNA
stabilization has been proposed as a mechanism of posttranscriptional
control.64-66 Very little information is currently
available to explain how PF4 might initiate its signal. Although
cell-surface receptors have been identified for other CXC chemokines
such as interleukin-8 (IL-8), growth-related oncogene (gro ),
stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), interferon-inducible protein 10 (IP-10), and others,67 as well as for heparin-binding ligands such as bFGF and VEGF, a cell-surface receptor specific for PF4
has eluded discovery. The high affinity of PF4 for cell-surface heparan
sulfate proteoglycans has complicated the isolation of a PF4-specific
receptor. The possibility exists that PF4 signals directly through
proteoglycan receptors such as syndecan, betaglycan, or perlecan. Even
though low-affinity proteoglycan receptors generally serve in an
auxiliary manner, presenting certain ligands to high-affinity receptors
through which subsequent signaling occurs,68 direct signaling through proteoglycans cannot be ruled out for PF4, especially considering its high affinity for heparan sulfate proteoglycan, on
which it recognizes a specific structural motif.69 Added support for this possibility is provided by a recent report in which
the ability of GAGs to mediate extracellular signals was shown.70,71 PF4 could be directly internalized via
proteoglycan receptors, as has been described for the CXC chemokine,
IL-8.72 In this case, initiation of PF4 signaling could be
intracellular. Of particular relevance, Luster et al58
reported that the CXC chemokine, IP-10, competed with PF4 for binding
to cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan and inhibited endothelial
cell proliferation, suggesting similar signaling mechanisms for the two
chemokines. A specific cell-surface receptor for IP-10 has been
identified on T lymphocytes. Although the Duffy antigen erythrocyte
chemokine receptor, also expressed on postcapillary venule
endothelial cells,73,74 has been possibly implicated
as a PF4 binding site,3 it does not appear to be linked to
any postreceptor signal transduction mechanisms,75 and is,
therefore, not a good candidate for transmission of PF4
antiproliferative signals. Future investigation into how PF4 signaling
is initiated is necessary to fully characterize the mechanism of
its antiproliferative effects.
PF4 anti-angiogenic action: Implications for cancer therapy.
PF4 is capable of inhibiting tumor growth and
metastasis.11,18,19 Using both in vitro and in vivo assay
systems, Strieter's group67 has proposed a
model of angiogenesis involving interplay between CXC chemokine
angiogenic factors possessing an N-terminal ELR motif (eg, IL-8 and gro
) and CXC chemokine angiostatic factors lacking the ELR motif (eg,
PF4 and IP-10). It was postulated that a shift in the balance of
angiogenic and angiostatic CXC chemokines contributes to the
invasiveness of non-small cell lung cancers and to development of
pulmonary fibrosis through dysregulated neovascularization.12,67 The demonstration that PF4 has
angiostatic potential justifies its consideration as an agent to treat
solid tumors and chronic inflammation-dependent fibroproliferative
disorders. Several preclinical studies17-20,76 and a
clinical trial21 have been initiated to examine its
effectiveness as an antineoplastic agent. A derivative of PF4,
truncated at its N-terminus, was reported to be more potent than the
wild-type molecule in its antiproliferative action on endothelial
cells.77 Maione et al11 found that the antiangiogenic action of PF4 requires a conserved C-terminus. Lecomte-Raclet et al78 found that a peptide corresponding
to the central region of PF4, but lacking affinity for heparin, was effective in inhibiting murine hematopoietic progenitors proliferation.
Numerous naturally occurring angiostatic molecules have been
characterized, including IP-10, thrombospondin 1, angiostatin, endostatin, and PF4. Although the molecular mechanisms of their action
are as yet unknown, inhibition of angiogenesis by angiostatin and PF4
is associated with inhibition of tumor growth and
metastasis.18-20,76,79 The present study is the first to
define a role for a specific cell cycle regulatory molecule,
p21Cip1/WAF1, in mediating the antiangiogenic properties of
a CXC chemokine. An understanding of the molecular action of naturally
occurring angiostatic agents could lead to the development of targeted
therapies effective in various diseases associated with dysregulated
angiogenesis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
We thank Marco Foschi and Andrey Sorokin for their useful comments and
suggestions. We are also indebted to Mortimer Poncz for providing the
cDNA clone encoding human PF4 and Cassie Nelson for her excellent
technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Submitted September 11, 1998;
accepted October 13, 1998.
Supported in part by Grants No. HL-13629, HL-51413, and HL-44612 from
the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
The publication costs of this
article were defrayed in part by
page charge payment. This article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address reprint requests to Gian Paolo Visentin, MD, Blood Research
Institute, The Blood Center of Southeastern Wisconsin, 8727 Watertown
Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226-3548; e-mail: gpvisentin{at}bcsew.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Oppenheim JJ, Zachariae CO, Mukaida N, Matsushima K:
Properties of the novel proinflammatory supergene "intercrine" cytokine family.
Ann Rev Immunol
9:617, 1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Rollins BJ:
Chemokines.
Blood
90:909, 1997[Free Full Text]
3.
Szabo MC, Soo KS, Zlotnik A, Schall TJ:
Chemokine class differences in binding to the Duffy antigen-erythrocyte chemokine receptor.
J Biol Chem
270:25348, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4.
Busch C, Dawes J, Pepper DS, Wasteson A:
Binding of platelet factor 4 to cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells.
Thromb Res
19:129, 1980[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Busch C, Owen WG:
Identification in vitro of an endothelial cell surface cofactor for antithrombin III. Parallel studies with isolated perfused rat hearts and microcarrier cultures of bovine endothelium.
J Clin Invest
69:726, 1982
6.
Rybak ME, Gimbrone MAJ, Davies PF, Handin RI:
Interaction of platelet factor four with cultured vascular endothelial cells.
Blood
73:1534, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7.
Lane DA, Denton J, Flynn AM, Thunberg L, Lindahl U:
Anticoagulant activities of heparin oligosaccharides and their neutralization by platelet factor 4.
Biochem J
218:725, 1984[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Marcum JA, McKenney JB, Rosenberg RD:
Acceleration of thrombin-antithrombin complex formation in rat hindquarters via heparinlike molecules bound to the endothelium.
J Clin Invest
74:341, 1984
9.
Stern D, Nawroth P, Marcum J, Handley D, Kisiel W, Rosenberg R, Stern:
Interaction of antithrombin III with bovine aortic segments. Role of heparin in binding and enhanced anticoagulant activity.
J Clin Invest
75:272, 1985
10.
Dudek AZ, Pennell CA, Decker TD, Young TA, Key NS, Slungaard A:
Platelet factor 4 binds to glycanated forms of thrombomodulin and to protein C A potential mechanism for enhancing generation of activated protein C.
J Biol Chem
272:31785, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11.
Maione TE, Gray GS, Petro J, Hunt AJ, Donner AL, Bauer SI, Carson HF, Sharpe RJ:
Inhibition of angiogenesis by recombinant human platelet factor-4 and related peptides.
Science
247:77, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12.
Strieter RM, Polverini PJ, Kunkel SL, Arenberg DA, Burdick MD, Kasper J, Dzuiba J, Van DJ, Walz A, Marriott D:
The functional role of the ELR motif in CXC chemokine-mediated angiogenesis.
J Biol Chem
270:27348, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13.
Han ZC, Sensebe L, Abgrall JF, Briere J:
Platelet factor 4 inhibits human megakaryocytopoiesis in vitro.
Blood
75:1234, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14.
Broxmeyer HE, Sherry B, Cooper S, Lu L, Maze R, Beckmann MP, Cerami A, Ralph P:
Comparative analysis of the human macrophage inflammatory protein family of cytokines (chemokines) on proliferation of human myeloid progenitor cells. Interacting effects involving suppression, synergistic suppression, and blocking of suppression.
J Immunol
150:3448, 1993[Abstract]
15.
Hanahan D, Folkman J:
Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis.
Cell
86:353, 1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Boehm T, Folkman J, Browder T, O'Reilly MS:
Antiangiogenic therapy of experimental cancer does not induce acquired drug resistance [see comments].
Nature
390:404, 1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Kolber DL, Knisely TL, Maione TE:
Inhibition of development of murine melanoma lung metastases by systemic administration of recombinant platelet factor 4.
J Natl Cancer Inst
87:304, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18.
Maione TE, Gray GS, Hunt AJ, Sharpe RJ:
Inhibition of tumor growth in mice by an analogue of platelet factor 4 that lacks affinity for heparin and retains potent angiostatic activity.
Cancer Res
51:2077, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19.
Sharpe RJ, Byers HR, Scott CF, Bauer SI, Maione TE:
Growth inhibition of murine melanoma and human colon carcinoma by recombinant human platelet factor 4.
J Natl Cancer Inst
82:848, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20.
Tanaka T, Manome Y, Wen P, Kufe DW, Fine HA:
Viral vector-mediated transduction of a modified platelet factor 4 cDNA inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth.
Nature Med
3:437, 1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Belman N, Bonnem EM, Harvey HA, Lipton A:
Phase I trial of recombinant platelet factor 4 (rPF4) in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.
Invest New Drugs
14:387, 1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Hansell P, Maione TE, Borgstrom P:
Selective binding of platelet factor 4 to regions of active angiogenesis in vivo.
Am J Physiol
269:H829, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23.
Watson JB, Getzler SB, Mosher DF:
Platelet factor 4 modulates the mitogenic activity of basic fibroblast growth factor.
J Clin Invest
94:261, 1994
24.
Gupta SK, Singh JP:
Inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation by platelet factor-4 involves a unique action on S phase progression.
J Cell Biol
127:1121, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25.
Morgan DO:
Principles of CDK regulation.
Nature
374:131, 1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Planas-Silva MD, Weinberg RA:
The restriction point and control of cell proliferation.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
9:768, 1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Weinberg RA:
The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control.
Cell
81:323, 1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Sherr CJ:
G1 phase progression: Cycling on cue [see comments].
Cell
79:551, 1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Sherr CJ:
Cancer cell cycles.
Science
274:1672, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30.
Sherr CJ:
D-type cyclins.
Trends Biochem Sci
20:187, 1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Sherr CJ, Roberts JM:
Inhibitors of mammalian G1 cyclin-dependent kinases.
Genes Dev
9:1149, 1995[Free Full Text]
32.
Harper JW, Elledge SJ:
Cdk inhibitors in development and cancer.
Curr Opin Genet Dev
6:56, 1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Datto MB, Li Y, Panus JF, Howe DJ, Xiong Y, Wang XF:
Transforming growth factor beta induces the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 through a p53-independent mechanism.
Proc Nat Acad Sci USA
92:5545, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34.
Mandal M, Bandyopadhyay D, Goepfert TM, Kumar R:
Interferon-induces expression of cyclin-dependent kinase-inhibitors p21WAF1 and p27Kip1 that prevent activation of cyclin-dependent kinase by CDK-activating kinase (CAK).
Oncogene
16:217, 1998[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Polyak K, Kato JY, Solomon MJ, Sherr CJ, Massague J, Roberts JM, Koff A:
p27Kip1, a cyclin-Cdk inhibitor, links transforming growth factor-beta and contact inhibition to cell cycle arrest.
Genes Dev
8:9, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36.
Harper JW, Adami GR, Wei N, Keyomarsi K, Elledge SJ:
The p21 Cdk-interacting protein Cip1 is a potent inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases.
Cell
75:805, 1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
el-Deiry WS, Tokino T, Velculescu VE, Levy DB, Parsons R, Trent JM, Lin, Mercer WE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B:
WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression.
Cell
75:817, 1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Xiong Y, Hannon GJ, Zhang H, Casso D, Kobayashi R, Beach D:
p21 is a universal inhibitor of cyclin kinases [see comments].
Nature
366:701, 1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Harper JW, Elledge SJ, Keyomarsi K, Dynlacht B, Tsai LH, Zhang P, Dobrowolski S, Bai C, Connell-Crowley L, Swindell E:
Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases by p21.
Mol Biol Cell
6:387, 1995[Abstract]
40.
Deng C, Zhang P, Harper JW, Elledge SJ, Leder P:
Mice lacking p21CIP1/WAF1 undergo normal development, but are defective in G1 checkpoint control.
Cell
82:675, 1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Michieli P, Chedid M, Lin D, Pierce JH, Mercer WE, Givol D:
Induction of WAF1/CIP1 by a p53-independent pathway.
Cancer Res
54:3391, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42.
Zeng YX, el-Deiry WS:
Regulation of p21WAF1/CIP1 expression by p53-independent pathways.
Oncogene
12:1557, 1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Waga S, Hannon GJ, Beach D, Stillman B:
The p21 inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases controls DNA replication by interaction with PCNA [see comments].
Nature
369:574, 1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Visentin GP, Ford SE, Scott JP, Aster RH:
Antibodies from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis are specific for platelet factor 4 complexed with heparin or bound to endothelial cells.
J Clin Invest
93:81, 1994
45.
Poncz M, Surrey S, LaRocco P, Weiss MJ, Rappaport EF, Conway TM, Schwartz E:
Cloning and characterization of platelet factor 4 cDNA derived from a human erythroleukemic cell line.
Blood
69:219, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46.
Barbieri B, Balconi G, Dejana E, Donati MB:
Evidence that vascular endothelial cells can induce the retraction of fibrin clots.
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med
168:204, 1981[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
47.
Balconi G, Dejana E:
Cultivation of endothelial cells: Limitations and perspectives.
Med Biol
64:231, 1986[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
48.
Sato Y, Abe M, Takaki R:
Platelet factor 4 blocks the binding of basic fibroblast growth factor to the receptor and inhibits the spontaneous migration of vascular endothelial cells.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
172:595, 1990[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
49.
Bono F, Rigon P, Lamarche I, Savi P, Salel V, Herbert JM:
Heparin inhibits the binding of basic fibroblast growth factor to cultured human aortic smooth-muscle cells.
Biochem J
326:661, 1997
50.
Laslett AL, McFarlane JR, Risbridger GP:
Developmental response by Leydig cells to acidic and basic fibroblast growth factor.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol
60:171, 1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
51.
Perollet C, Han ZC, Savona C, Caen JP, Bikfalvi A:
Platelet factor 4 modulates fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2) activity and inhibits FGF-2 dimerization.
Blood
91:3289, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52.
Aviezer D, Yayon A:
Heparin-dependent binding and autophosphorylation of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor by heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor but not by EGF.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:12173, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53.
Mihara K, Cao XR, Yen A, Chandler S, Driscoll B, Murphree AL, Ang A, Fung YK:
Cell cycle-dependent regulation of phosphorylation of the human retinoblastoma gene product.
Science
246:1300, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54.
DeCaprio JA, Ludlow JW, Lynch D, Furukawa Y, Griffin J, Piwnica-Worms H, Huang CM, Livingston DM:
The product of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene has properties of a cell cycle regulatory element.
Cell
58:1085, 1989[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
55.
Lundberg AS, Weinberg RA:
Functional inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein requires sequential modification by at least two distinct cyclin-cdk complexes.
Mol Cell Biol
18:753, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56.
Dumont FJ, Su Q:
Mechanism of action of the immunosuppressant rapamycin.
Life Sci
58:373, 1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
57.
Wiederrecht GJ, Sabers CJ, Brunn GJ, Martin MM, Dumont FJ, Abraham RT:
Mechanism of action of rapamycin: New insights into the regulation of G1-phase progression in eukaryotic cells.
Prog Cell Cycle Res
1:53, 1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
58.
Luster AD, Greenberg SM, Leder P:
The IP-10 chemokine binds to a specific cell surface heparan sulfate site shared with platelet factor 4 and inhibits endothelial cell proliferation.
J Exp Med
182:219, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59.
Bikfalvi A, Javerzat S, Perollet C, Savona C:
Angiogenesis and cancer.
Bulletin du Cancer
84:885, 1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
60.
Gengrinovitch S, Greenberg SM, Cohen T, Gitay-Goren H, Rockwell P, Maione TE, Levi BZ, Neufeld G:
Platelet factor-4 inhibits the mitogenic activity of VEGF121 and VEGF165 using several concurrent mechanisms.
J Biol Chem
270:15059, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
61.
Brown KJ, Parish CR:
Histidine-rich glycoprotein and platelet factor 4 mask heparan sulfate proteoglycans recognized by acidic and basic fibroblast growth factor.
Biochemistry
33:13918, 1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
62.
Li CY, Suardet L, Little JB:
Potential role of WAF1/Cip1/p21 as a mediator of TGF-beta cytoinhibitory effect.
J Biol Chem
270:4971, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63.
Chen CY, Shyu AB:
AU-rich elements: Characterization and importance in mRNA degradation.
Trends Biochem Sci
20:465, 1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
64.
Li XS, Rishi AK, Shao ZM, Dawson MI, Jong L, Shroot B, Reichert U, Ordonez J, Fontana JA:
Posttranscriptional regulation of p21WAF1/CIP1 expression in human breast carcinoma cells.
Cancer Res
56:5055, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
65.
Schwaller J, Koeffler HP, Niklaus G, Loetscher P, Nagel, Fey MF, Tobler A:
Posttranscriptional stabilization underlies p53-independent induction of p21WAF1/CIP1/SDI1 in differentiating human leukemic cells.
J Clin Invest
95:973, 1995
66.
Gorospe M, Wang X, Holbrook NJ:
p53-dependent elevation of p21Waf1 expression by UV light is mediated through mRNA stabilization and involves a vanadate-sensitive regulatory system.
Mol Cell Biol
18:1400, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
67.
Keane MP, Arenberg DA, Moore BB, Addison CL, Strieter RM:
CXC Chemokines and angiogenesis/angiostasis.
Proc Assoc Am Phys
110:288, 1998[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
68.
Schlessinger J, Lax I, Lemmon M:
Regulation of growth factor activation by proteoglycans: What is the role of the low affinity receptors?
Cell
83:357, 1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
69.
Stringer SE, Gallagher JT:
Specific binding of the chemokine platelet factor 4 to heparan sulfate.
J Biol Chem
272:20508, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
70.
Oh ES, Woods A, Couchman JR:
Syndecan-4 proteoglycan regulates the distribution and activity of protein kinase C.
J Biol Chem
272:8133, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
71.
Oh ES, Woods A, Lim ST, Theibert AW, Couchman JR:
Syndecan-4 proteoglycan cytoplasmic domain and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate coordinately regulate protein kinase C activity.
J Biol Chem
273:10624, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
72.
Middleton J, Neil S, Wintle J, Clark-Lewis I, Moore H, Lam C, Auer M, Hub E, Rot A:
Transcytosis and surface presentation of IL-8 by venular endothelial cells.
Cell
91:385, 1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
73.
Peiper SC, Wang ZX, Neote K, Martin AW, Showell HJ, Conklyn MJ, Ogborne, Hadley TJ, Lu ZH, Hesselgesser J:
The Duffy antigen/receptor for chemokines (DARC) is expressed in endothelial cells of Duffy negative individuals who lack the erythrocyte receptor.
J Exp Med
181:1311, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
74.
Chaudhuri A, Nielsen S, Elkjaer ML, Zbrzezna V, Fang F, Pogo AO:
Detection of Duffy antigen in the plasma membranes and caveolae of vascular endothelial and epithelial cells of nonerythroid organs [see comments].
Blood
89:701, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
75.
Hadley TJ, Peiper SC:
From malaria to chemokine receptor: The emerging physiologic role of the Duffy blood group antigen.
Blood
89:3077, 1997[Free Full Text]
76.
Yoshimitsu K, Wright KC, Wallace S, Charnsangavej C, Mavligit GM:
Hepatic arterial infusion of recombinant platelet factor-4 suppresses metastases to the lungs from tumors implanted into the livers of rabbits.
Cancer
75:2435, 1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
77.
Gupta SK, Hassel T, Singh JP:
A potent inhibitor of endothelial cell proliferation is generated by proteolytic cleavage of the chemokine platelet factor 4.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:7799, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
78.
Lecomte-Raclet L, Alemany M, Sequira-Le GA, Amiral J, Quentin G, Vissac AM, Caen JP, Han ZC:
New insights into the negative regulation of hematopoiesis by chemokine platelet factor 4 and related peptides.
Blood
91:2772, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
79.
Cao Y, O'Reilly MS, Marshall B, Flynn E, Ji RW, Folkman:
Expression of angiostatin cDNA in a murine fibrosarcoma suppresses primary tumor growth and produces long-term dormancy of metastases.
J Clin Invest
101:1055, 1998[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Ziegler, M. Oberbarnscheidt, S. Bulfone-Paus, R. Forster, U. Kunzendorf, and S. Krautwald
CCR7 Signaling Inhibits T Cell Proliferation
J. Immunol.,
November 15, 2007;
179(10):
6485 - 6493.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Kasper, E. Brandt, S. Brandau, and F. Petersen
Platelet Factor 4 (CXC Chemokine Ligand 4) Differentially Regulates Respiratory Burst, Survival, and Cytokine Expression of Human Monocytes by Using Distinct Signaling Pathways
J. Immunol.,
August 15, 2007;
179(4):
2584 - 2591.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. von Hundelshausen and C. Weber
Platelets as Immune Cells: Bridging Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease
Circ. Res.,
January 5, 2007;
100(1):
27 - 40.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Kasper, E. Brandt, M. Ernst, and F. Petersen
Neutrophil adhesion to endothelial cells induced by platelet factor 4 requires sequential activation of Ras, Syk, and JNK MAP kinases
Blood,
March 1, 2006;
107(5):
1768 - 1775.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Chang, J. C. Tou, C. Hong, H.-A. Kim, J. E. Riby, G. L. Firestone, and L. F. Bjeldanes
3,3'-Diindolylmethane inhibits angiogenesis and the growth of transplantable human breast carcinoma in athymic mice
Carcinogenesis,
April 1, 2005;
26(4):
771 - 778.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Y. Liu, M. Battaglia, S. H. Lee, Q.-H. Sun, R. H. Aster, and G. P. Visentin
Platelet Factor 4 Differentially Modulates CD4+CD25+ (Regulatory) versus CD4+CD25- (Nonregulatory) T Cells
J. Immunol.,
March 1, 2005;
174(5):
2680 - 2686.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Struyf, M. D. Burdick, P. Proost, J. Van Damme, and R. M. Strieter
Platelets Release CXCL4L1, a Nonallelic Variant of the Chemokine Platelet Factor-4/CXCL4 and Potent Inhibitor of Angiogenesis
Circ. Res.,
October 29, 2004;
95(9):
855 - 857.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Daly, A. Makris, M. Reed, and C. E. Lewis
Hemostatic Regulators of Tumor Angiogenesis: A Source of Antiangiogenic Agents for Cancer Treatment?
J Natl Cancer Inst,
November 19, 2003;
95(22):
1660 - 1673.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Lasagni, M. Francalanci, F. Annunziato, E. Lazzeri, S. Giannini, L. Cosmi, C. Sagrinati, B. Mazzinghi, C. Orlando, E. Maggi, et al.
An Alternatively Spliced Variant of CXCR3 Mediates the Inhibition of Endothelial Cell Growth Induced by IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC, and Acts as Functional Receptor for Platelet Factor 4
J. Exp. Med.,
June 2, 2003;
197(11):
1537 - 1549.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Lubeseder-Martellato, E. Guenzi, A. Jorg, K. Topolt, E. Naschberger, E. Kremmer, C. Zietz, E. Tschachler, P. Hutzler, M. Schwemmle, et al.
Guanylate-Binding Protein-1 Expression Is Selectively Induced by Inflammatory Cytokines and Is an Activation Marker of Endothelial Cells during Inflammatory Diseases
Am. J. Pathol.,
November 1, 2002;
161(5):
1749 - 1759.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Sulpice, M. Bryckaert, J. Lacour, J.-O. Contreres, and G. Tobelem
Platelet factor 4 inhibits FGF2-induced endothelial cell proliferation via the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway but not by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway
Blood,
October 16, 2002;
100(9):
3087 - 3094.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Bernardini, G. Spinetti, D. Ribatti, G. Camarda, L. Morbidelli, M. Ziche, A. Santoni, M. C. Capogrossi, and M. Napolitano
I-309 binds to and activates endothelial cell functions and acts as an angiogenic molecule in vivo
Blood,
December 15, 2000;
96(13):
4039 - 4045.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. E. Van den Steen, P. Proost, A. Wuyts, J. Van Damme, and G. Opdenakker
Neutrophil gelatinase B potentiates interleukin-8 tenfold by aminoterminal processing, whereas it degrades CTAP-III, PF-4, and GRO-alpha and leaves RANTES and MCP-2 intact
Blood,
October 15, 2000;
96(8):
2673 - 2681.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Belperio, M. P. Keane, D. A. Arenberg, C. L. Addison, J. E. Ehlert, M. D. Burdick, and R. M. Strieter
CXC chemokines in angiogenesis
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
July 1, 2000;
68(1):
1 - 8.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. W. J. van der Schaft, E. A. H. Toebes, J. R. Haseman, K. H. Mayo, and A. W. Griffioen
Bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI) inhibits angiogenesis via induction of apoptosis in vascular endothelial cells
Blood,
July 1, 2000;
96(1):
176 - 181.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|