Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wickremasinghe, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hoffbrand, A. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wickremasinghe, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hoffbrand, A. V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Review Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, Vol. 93 No. 11 (June 1), 1999: pp. 3587-3600

REVIEW ARTICLE

Biochemical and Genetic Control of Apoptosis: Relevance to Normal Hematopoiesis and Hematological Malignancies

By R. Gitendra Wickremasinghe and A. Victor Hoffbrand

From the Department of Hematology, Royal Free and University College School of Medicine, London, UK.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1. MORPHOLOGICAL AND...
2. GENETIC STUDIES IN...
3. SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION...
4. THE BCL-2 PROTEIN...
5. THE p53 PROTEIN
6. THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ROLES...
7. THE INFLUENCE OF...
8. ALTERED EXPRESSION OF...
9. DELETION AND MUTATION...
10. THE CHIMERIC BCR/ABL...
11. CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATIONS...
PERSPECTIVES
REFERENCES

GENETIC CHANGES involving oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes contribute to the deregulated expansion of malignant cells. While some of these changes result in increased proliferation, others contribute to an increase in cell numbers by inhibiting apoptosis (programmed cell death).1 Because cytotoxic drugs or irradiation result in cell killing by apoptosis, the genetic changes underlying malignancy often reduce the ability of these agents to destroy malignant cells.1,2 The elucidation of the pathways involved in the regulation of apoptosis in normal and malignant hematopoietic cells is therefore likely to contribute to the development of improved therepeutic stategies in the treatment of leukemia and lymphoma. This review first summarizes recent advances in the understanding of the control of apoptosis. Examples of how this control is altered in leukemic cells is then described.


    1. MORPHOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL FEATURES OF APOPTOSIS
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1. MORPHOLOGICAL AND...
2. GENETIC STUDIES IN...
3. SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION...
4. THE BCL-2 PROTEIN...
5. THE p53 PROTEIN
6. THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ROLES...
7. THE INFLUENCE OF...
8. ALTERED EXPRESSION OF...
9. DELETION AND MUTATION...
10. THE CHIMERIC BCR/ABL...
11. CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATIONS...
PERSPECTIVES
REFERENCES

Apoptosis is a tightly regulated form of physiological cell death which is dependent on the expression of cell-intrinsic suicide machinery.3 Prominent morphological changes include cell shrinkage, condensation of the nuclear chromatin, fragmentation of the nucleus, and cleavage of chromosomal DNA at internucleosomal sites, resulting in the generation of a characteristic ladder pattern of DNA fragments on electrophoresis. Blebbing of the cell surface results in the release of membrane-bound apoptotic bodies.3 Phosphatidylserine, which is normally located on the inner face of the plasma membrane, becomes exposed on the outer surface and provides a recognition signal for engulfment by phagocytes.4,5 Thus, apoptosis results in the rapid and efficient removal of superfluous or damaged cells.


    2. GENETIC STUDIES IN CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROVIDE A FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING PATHWAYS OF APOPTOSIS REGULATION
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1. MORPHOLOGICAL AND...
2. GENETIC STUDIES IN...
3. SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION...
4. THE BCL-2 PROTEIN...
5. THE p53 PROTEIN
6. THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ROLES...
7. THE INFLUENCE OF...
8. ALTERED EXPRESSION OF...
9. DELETION AND MUTATION...
10. THE CHIMERIC BCR/ABL...
11. CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATIONS...
PERSPECTIVES
REFERENCES

Genetic studies in the nematode C elegans have resulted in the identification of a set of genes involved in the regulation of apoptosis.6 The ced-3 gene encodes a cysteine protease, which is homologous to members of the caspase protease family that execute the apoptotic program in mammalian cells (see section 3.1). The ced-4 gene product is required for the activation of CED-3. This activation step is blocked by the CED-9 protein, which is homologous to mammalian BCL-2. BCL-2 can substitute for CED-9 in blocking apoptosis in C elegans7,8 whereas overexpression of CED-4 induces apoptosis in mammalian cells,9 suggesting a high degree of conservation of the mechanisms of apoptosis regulation. Therefore, the C elegans model has been of value in the identification of the proteins that control apoptosis in human cells (see sections 3 and 4).


    3. SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION PROCESSES IN THE REGULATION OF APOPTOSIS
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1. MORPHOLOGICAL AND...
2. GENETIC STUDIES IN...
3. SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION...
4. THE BCL-2 PROTEIN...
5. THE p53 PROTEIN
6. THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ROLES...
7. THE INFLUENCE OF...
8. ALTERED EXPRESSION OF...
9. DELETION AND MUTATION...
10. THE CHIMERIC BCR/ABL...
11. CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATIONS...
PERSPECTIVES
REFERENCES

The induction of apoptosis may conveniently be divided into three stages: (1) the interaction of the inducing signal with the cell, (2) biochemical transduction of the death signal, and (3) the execution of apoptosis. Because different extracellular signals and signal transduction pathways converge on a final common pathway during the execution phase, this terminal stage of apoptosis will be summarized first.

3.1. The caspase family of proteases mediates the terminal stages of apoptotic cell death.   The terminal stages of apoptosis involve the activation of a related family of proteases, the caspases.10,11 These enzymes possess an essential cysteine residue within their active sites and cleave substrates adjacent to aspartate residues. The cDNAs encoding 10 caspases have been cloned.10

Caspases are expressed as inactive pro-enzymes. Cleavage of these pro-caspases adjacent to aspartate residues results in the generation of active subunits of approximately 10 and 20 kD (Fig 1). These subunits dimerize, with the resultant generation of a complete active site.10 The N-terminal pro-domains (Fig 1) of some pro-caspases, which are removed during activation, nevertheless play important roles in mediating regulatory interactions between caspases and other proteins. The requirement for cleavage adjacent to aspartate residues during caspase activation, together with the aspartate specificity of caspases, raises the possibility that cascades of caspase activation events may be involved in apoptosis regulation (see sections 3.3 and 4.3).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Structure and activation of caspases. The peptide sequences that contribute to the enzymatically active caspase are shown in cross-hatch. Asp, aspartate residues at which the inactive pro-caspase is proteolytically cleaved with the resultant generation of the active subunits.

Caspases 3, 6, and 7 are terminal members of caspase cascades and recognize critical cellular substrates, whose cleavage contributes to the morphological and functional changes associated with apoptosis.10 Caspase 3 substrates include poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase,12,13 an enzyme involved in regulation of DNA repair and gelsolin, a cytoskeletal protein.14 Caspase 3 activation also results in DNA cleavage via inactivation of an inhibitor of DNA fragmentation factor, the endonuclease responsible for internucleosomal cleavage of chromatin.15 Caspase 6 substrates include the nuclear structural protein, lamin.16 Thus, the cleavage of a relatively restricted set of critical caspase substrates contributes to the apoptotic demise of cells via disassembly of structural components, cleavage of the genetic material, and prevention of DNA repair.

3.2. Specific protease inhibitors block cell death by targetting terminal caspases.   In vitro studies suggest that the inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) family of proteins may modulate cell death via abrogation of caspase activity.

These proteins are similar to the baculovirus-encoded caspase inhibitor p35. IAP1 and 2, XIAP (X-linked IAP) and survivin contain one to three BIR (baculovirus IAP repeat) motifs that are essential to their function.17 IAPs 1 and 2 and XIAP specifically target caspases 3 and 7, which function at the distal end of proteolytic cascades. Therefore, IAP expression may serve to reprieve cells otherwise committed to apoptotic death. However, the Drosophila IAPs (DIAP-1 and DIAP-2) block apoptosis by direct binding via the BIR motifs to noncaspase death-inducing proteins encoded by the reaper, hid, and grim genes.18 Therefore, it is possible that the mammalian IAPs may also inhibit cell death by mechanisms other than binding to caspases.

The key question regarding cell death regulation concerns the mechanisms by which caspase activation steps are triggered by apoptotic signals. Different extracellular signals interact with the caspase system in different ways.

3.3. Ligation of FAS or the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor results in the direct activation of caspases.   FAS and the TNF receptor are structurally related transmembrane receptor proteins. Their extracellular domains bind FAS ligand and TNF, respectively, resulting in the formation of receptor trimers. The cytoplasmic domain of FAS contains a "death domain" (Fig 2), whose elimination results in the abrogation of cell killing.19 The death domain of FAS recruits the death domain of the FADD (Fas-associated death domain) protein following receptor trimerization.20 FADD also contains a death-effector domain, which mediates interaction with similar amino acid sequences in the pro-domain of pro-caspase 8.21,22 Trimerization of the FAS/FADD/pro-caspase 8 complex after ligand binding results in the cleavage of the pro-caspase and generation of active caspase 8. Caspase 8 then cleaves pro-caspase 3, probably via activation of an unidentified intermediate caspase (Fig 2).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Signal transduction by FAS. Protein-protein interactions between the death domains (horizontal stripes) of FAS and FADD and the death-effector domains (stippled) of FADD and pro-caspase 8 are shown. Trimerization of receptor complexes after binding of FAS to FAS ligand results in the cleavage of pro-caspase 8 and the release of active caspase 8.

Activation of apoptosis after TNF receptor ligation follows a similar pattern. However, the TNF receptor does not bind FADD directly, but does so via a linking protein, TRADD (TNF receptor-associated death domain).19

3.4. Apoptosis induction by the perforin/granzyme system.   Killing of target cells by cytotoxic T lymphocytes plays a major role in defense against malignant and virus-infected cells, and contributes to transplant rejection and autoimmune disease. Killing is preceded by the release of the contents of cytotoxic T-cell granules, which contain perforin and the serine proteases granzymes A and B. Perforin forms a pore in the plasma membrane of the target cell, thereby allowing entry of granzyme B into the cytosol.23 Granzyme B cleaves and activates caspase 3 in cell-free systems.24,25 However, the primary target of granzyme B in intact cells is likely to be caspase 10, whose activation results in the subsequent activation of caspase 3.26 In cell-free systems, the addition of granzyme B initiates cleavage of several apoptosis-specific substrates and also induces chromatin condensation. Abrogation of these events by selective inhibitors suggests that activation of caspase 3 (and possibly of caspase 7) may be important mediators of apoptosis induction by cytotoxic T-cell-derived granzyme B.26 However, genetic studies have shown that the granules of cytotoxic T cells contain additional cytotoxic components in addition to perforin and granzymes A and B.27


    4. THE BCL-2 PROTEIN FAMILY
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1. MORPHOLOGICAL AND...
2. GENETIC STUDIES IN...
3. SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION...
4. THE BCL-2 PROTEIN...
5. THE p53 PROTEIN
6. THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ROLES...
7. THE INFLUENCE OF...
8. ALTERED EXPRESSION OF...
9. DELETION AND MUTATION...
10. THE CHIMERIC BCR/ABL...
11. CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATIONS...
PERSPECTIVES
REFERENCES

4.1. The BCL-2 protein family plays a central role in the regulation of apoptosis.   The 26-kD BCL-2 protein protects cells from the induction of apoptosis by diverse stimuli, including the withdrawal of survival factors, heat shock, and treatment with DNA damaging agents.28-30 BCL-2 is the prototype of a family of related proteins. Other anti-apoptotic family members include BCL-XL, BCL-w, MCL-1, and A1. In contrast, the BAX, BAK, and BAD proteins are examples of pro-apoptotic BCL-2 family members whose overexpression promotes cell killing.30 The conserved BH1 (BCL-2 homology 1) and BH2 domains of the anti-apoptotic proteins form a hydrophobic cleft which binds the BH3 domains of pro-apoptotic family members, at least in vitro.31,32

The susceptibility of cells to apoptosis is determined in part by the relative concentrations of pro- and anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members. The antagonistic actions of these two groups of proteins have been attributed to their ability to form heterodimers.33 However, at least some of the dimerization properties of the BCL-2 family may be artefacts induced by detergents in vitro.34 Furthermore, genetic studies suggest that BCL-2 and BAX function independently of one another in the regulation of apoptosis.35 Deletion of the BH4 domain of BCL-2 impairs its ability to block apoptosis without affecting its dimerization with anti-apoptotic family members.9 Deletion of the BH3 domain of BAX, which is required for its dimerization, does not impair the ability of the protein to increase the sensitivity of cells to cytotoxic agents.36 Therefore, it is plausible that the actions of pro- and anti-apoptotic members of the BCL-2 family may determine the sensitivity of cells to apoptosis induction via binding to a common target rather than to dimer formation.35,36

BCL-2 targets to the outer mitochondrial membrane, the nuclear envelope, and the endoplasmic reticulum via its C-terminal hydrophobic domain.30,37,38 However, some studies suggest that BAX shows a largely diffuse sub-cellular localization, translocating rapidly to the mitochondria (and possibly other organelles) after the induction of an apoptotic signal.39

The BCL-2 family regulates apoptosis induction via control of the activation of caspases, apparently by a mechanism involving the release of mitochondrial cytochrome c.11 However, it is unclear whether cytochrome c release is a component of the primary apoptosis induction pathway or a means of amplifying the death signal, as summarized later (see sections 4.3 and 4.4). The mechanism of cytochrome c-dependent caspase activation is discussed next.

4.2. Cytochrome c triggers caspase 3 cleavage via activation of caspase 9.   Three proteins have been purified from the cytosol of HeLa cells which, when recombined in the presence of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) (or deoxy ATP), were necessary and sufficient for the cleavage and activation of pro-caspase 3. These proteins, originally designated as Apaf 1, 2, and 3 (Apaf = apoptotic protease activating factor) have been characterized.40,41 Apaf 1 contains a central domain with homology to C elegans CED-4.40 The amino-terminal domain of Apaf 1 is homologous to the CARDs (caspase recruitment domains) of some caspases (Fig 3). The carboxy terminus consists of several WD repeats, which mediate interactions between certain regulatory proteins. Apaf 2 was found to be identical to cytochrome c,40 while Apaf 3 is identical to caspase 9.41


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Apaf-1- and cytochrome c-dependent activation of caspases.

A model11,41,42 for the cytochrome c-dependent activation of caspase 3 is depicted in Fig 3. In the absence of cytochrome c, the WD repeat domain prevents interaction of Apaf-1 with pro-caspase 9. Cytochrome c binds Apaf 1, inducing a conformational change that results in the interaction of Apaf 1 and caspase 9, mediated by the CARD pro-domains present on both these proteins. Apaf-1 induces the cleavage and activation of pro-caspase 9 via a mechanism involving oligomerization of Apaf-1, thus facilitating autocatalytic cleavage of the pro-caspase.42 Activated caspase 9 now cleaves and activates caspase 3.

4.3. The BCL-2 protein family apparently regulates the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria.   Cytochrome c is released from mitochondria during apoptosis induced by diverse stimuli.11 Overexpression of BCL-2 or BCL-XL inhibit cytochrome c release induced by etoposide, actinomycin D, oxidative stress, Fas ligation, or interleukin-3 (IL-3) withdrawal.43-45 The BAX protein, on the other hand, triggers redistribution of cytochrome c in the absence of apoptotic stimuli.46 Thus, BCL-2 and BCL-XL may prevent apoposis by inhibiting cytochrome c release while BAX favors cell death by promoting its relocation to the cytosol. However, it is unclear whether these actions of the BCL-2 family result from the direct actions of these proteins on mitochondria, which then initiate caspase activation or whether cytochrome c release is secondary to BCL-2 family-regulated caspase activation and plays a subsequent role in amplification of the apoptotic signal.47

Some evidence suggests a direct role for the BCL-2 family in regulating cytochrome c release. The structure of BCL-XL resembles that of pore-forming bacterial toxins.31 BCL-2, BCL-XL, and BAX form ion channels in vitro.48-50 Because pores formed by BAX protein may show high conductance values under some conditions,50 it is possible that these channels allow the exit of cytochrome c. Anti-apoptotic proteins including BCL-2 may block release by interfering with pore formation by BAX.50 However, channel formation by BCL-2 family proteins has only been shown in synthetic membranes and, in some cases, at nonphysiological pH.48-50 Therefore, it has not been established that these proteins can form channels in cellular membranes under physiological conditions.

An alternative hypothesis suggests that BCL-2 family proteins regulate the electrical potential gradient (Delta psi m) across the inner mitochondrial membrane and thereby regulate mitochodrial volume. The opening of "megachannels" in the inner membrane allows the passage of molecules of less than 1.5 kD, resulting in the dissipation of Delta psi m. Apoptosis induced by stimuli including antineoplastic drugs and glucocorticoids is apparently preceded by disruption of the gradient. Both the loss of Delta psi m and subsequent apoptosis induction are blocked by the megachannel antagonist bongkrekic acid or by overexpression of BCL-2 or BCL-XL.51,52 Therefore, changes in the permeability of the inner mitochondrial membrane may be a central coordinating event in the induction of apoptosis, which is inhibited by anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members.51 The reported ability of BCL-2 to modulate ion fluxes across the inner mitochondrial membrane53 is compatible with this hypothesis. The precise mechanistic relationship between loss of Delta psi m and cytochrome c release has not been established. However, because loss of Delta psi m results in mitochondrial swelling, Delta psi m loss may cause cytochrome c release as a result of outer membrane rupture.45

It is now apparent that the BCL-2 family regulates steps in apoptotic signaling distal to cytochrome c release. BCL-2 overexpression blocks apoptosis in cells containing high concentrations of cytosolic cytochrome c, induced either by transient expression of BAX54 or by direct microinjection.55 These observations may be accounted for by the direct action of some anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members on caspase activation, because BCL-XL can bind Apaf-1 directly and block its ability to activate pro-caspase 9.56 Such a function for BCL-2 family proteins parallels the role of the C elegans BCL-2 homologue CED-9.57 A model that combines the putative ability of BCL-2 family members to regulate both cytochrome c release and the Apaf-1-mediated activation of pro-caspase 9 (the "Swiss army knife" model47) is depicted in Fig 4A.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Models relating the roles of BCL-2 family proteins, cytochrome c release, and Apaf-1-dependent caspase activation during the induction of apoptosis. (A) "Swiss army knife" model; (B) "death cycle" model. See text for details.

4.4. Caspase action on mitochondria amplifies the initial apoptotic signal via a positive feedback loop.   Caspases can themselves trigger cytochrome c release, because selective inhibitors of these proteases can abrogate release in response to some stimuli.45 Furthermore, death signals including ligation of Fas, which directly activate caspases (section 4.2), may nevertheless be amplified via caspase-mediated cytochrome c release.45 Recombinant caspases disrupt Delta psi m and induce cytochrome c release when added to isolated mitochondria.58 The mechanism of this action of caspases is unclear.

The operation of a positive feedback loop raises the possibility that anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members may not play a direct role in the modulation of cytochrome c release. The ability of these proteins to directly inhibit Apaf-1 function56 could instead modulate cytochrome c release indirectly via the caspase-dependent feedback loop. This "death cycle" model47 implies that cytochrome c release is not a component of the apoptosis-initiating pathway but serves in the amplification of an initial signal generated via the regulation of Apaf-1 (Fig 4B).

4.5. Survival factors regulate apoptosis via phosphorylation of the BAD protein.   The BAD protein is a pro-apoptotic member of the BCL-2 family.30,59 FL5.12 lymphoid cells depend on IL-3 for their survival in vitro. In cells cultured in the presence of IL-3, the BAD protein is phosphorylated on serine residues. Phosphorylated BAD is sequestered via binding to the 14-3-3 protein and is, therefore, unable to promote apoptosis.59 The BAD protein rapidly becomes dephosphorylated in the absence of IL-3, dissociates from 14-3-3, and triggers apoptosis (Fig 5).


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Apoptosis modulation by IL-3 via phosphorylation of the pro-apoptotic BAD protein.

Recent evidence has implicated protein kinase B as the protein kinase that mediates BAD phosphorylation in response to IL-360 and other survival factors61 (Fig 4). IL-3 triggers activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, a lipid kinase that initiates the eventual generation of phosphatidylinositol 3,4-bisphosphate, an allosteric activator of protein kinase B.62


    5. THE p53 PROTEIN
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1. MORPHOLOGICAL AND...
2. GENETIC STUDIES IN...
3. SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION...
4. THE BCL-2 PROTEIN...
5. THE p53 PROTEIN
6. THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ROLES...
7. THE INFLUENCE OF...
8. ALTERED EXPRESSION OF...
9. DELETION AND MUTATION...
10. THE CHIMERIC BCR/ABL...
11. CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATIONS...
PERSPECTIVES
REFERENCES

The p53 protein plays an important role in the coupling of DNA damage to cell-cycle arrest and to the induction of apoptosis. In cells with undamaged DNA, p53 protein levels are maintained at a low level as a result of rapid turnover. An increase in stability after the induction of DNA damage results in an increased level of p53.63 The protein product of the ataxia telangiectasia (atm) gene participates in a pathway that links the detection of DNA damage to the upregulation of p53.64 However, the carboxy terminus of the p53 protein itself can bind to damaged DNA,65 suggesting that both p53 and the putative damage detector may colocalize at the site of DNA damage. The radiation resistance of thymocytes derived from p53 "knockout" mice when compared with wild-type thymocytes66,67 emphasizes the importance of p53-dependent mechanisms in the induction of apoptosis after DNA damage induction. Upregulation of p53 also results in cell-cycle arrest. The pathways involved in this facet of p53 action have recently been reviewed.63

5.1. Transcriptional activation by p53.   A tetramer of p53 molecules functions as a transcription factor that binds to consensus sequences in the 5' untranslated regions of specific target genes.63 The upstream region of the BAX gene contains p53 consensus binding sites.68 Enforced p53 expression augments BAX expression, which is followed by apoptosis induction.69 Genetic studies on apoptosis induction in adriamycin-treated mouse fibroblasts suggest that BAX is an important (but not the only) effector of p53-mediated apoptosis.70 However, thymocytes isolated from p53 "knockout" mice expressing elevated levels of BAX are as resistant to etoposide-induced apoptosis as are thymocytes from p53 "knockout" mice expressing normal levels of bax.71 Therefore, mechanisms other than BAX induction may mediate p53-dependent apoptosis, at least in some cell types.

Polyak et al72 have identified 12 mRNA species which were rapidly induced after adenovirus-mediated transfer of the p53 gene into p53 null colorectal carcinoma cells. These p53-induced genes (PIGs) either encode proteins that catalyze redox reactions and consequently generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) or whose expression is augmented by ROS generation. Indeed, introduction of p53 into p53 null cells results in a burst of ROS generation that is followed by apoptosis induction. Inhibitors of ROS generation do not interfere with induction of PIG genes by p53 but do abrogate apoptosis induction, suggesting that the upregulated expression of PIG genes and the subsequent generation of ROS play a critical role in the induction of apoptosis by p53 at least in some cell types.72 ROS can themselves trigger cytochrome c release from mitochondria,44 possibly via modulation of ion transport within these organelles,53,73 suggesting an additional mechanism for the induction of apoptosis by p53.

Transient expression of p53 results in ROS generation in cells that are susceptible to p53-mediated apoptosis but not in resistant cells, compatible with the hypothesis that ROS are downstream mediators of p53-induced apoptosis.74 However, the role of ROS in the regulation of apoptosis remains controversial, because in some studies the induction of cell death is not abrogated at very low oxygen tension.75,76

5.2. Transcriptional repression by p53.   In addition to its transactivating properties, p53 represses transcription from several promoters that lack p53 binding sites. BCL-2 can relieve this transcriptional repression and also protect cells from apoptosis, suggesting that inhibition of transcription of specific but as yet unidentified genes may contribute to the ability of p53 to induce apoptosis.77 However, p53 is also able to induce apoptosis via pathways that are not dependent on the regulation of gene expression.78 Therefore, induction of apoptosis by p53 can occur by diverse pathways depending on the cellular context. It is also clear that some apoptotic pathways do not involve p53. For example, thymocytes from p53 knockout mice are resistant to etoposide and radiation but not to glucocorticoids.67 Furthermore, HL60 cells, which have lost both p53 alleles, are extremely sensitive to apoptosis induction by drugs that induce DNA strand-breaks.79 The p53 dependence of apoptotic pathways is also tissue dependent, because radiation-induced apoptosis is compromised in the thymus of p53 knockout mice, but not in the lung.80

5.3. p53 loss results in resistance to cytotoxic regimes.   When transplanted into imunodeficient mice, fibrosarcomas expressing functional p53 show a high proportion of apoptotic cells and regress after treatment with adriamycin or gamma  radiation. In contrast, tumors lacking p53 show few apoptoses and are resistant to adriamyin or radiation.81 Therefore, inactivation of p53 can result in the resistance of tumors to DNA damaging agents. The elevation of BAX expression in response to radiation is only detected in human leukemia cell lines that express p53 and that die by apoptosis in response to DNA damage. By contrast, p53-negative lines do not elevate BAX levels and are also resistant to radiation-induced apoptosis.82 Therefore, p53-mediated elevation of BAX contributes to the killing of some tumor cells by cytotoxic regimes.77

5.4. The p53-related p73 gene product.   The p73 gene encodes a protein that is closely related to p53.83 Overexpresion of p73 results in the induction of some genes that are also targets of p53, and also induces apoptosis. However, p73 expression is apparently not augmented after the induction of DNA damage.83 Therefore, there is at present no evidence implicating p73 in DNA damage-induced cell killing.


    6. THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ROLES OF APOPTOSIS IN THE HEMATOPOIETIC AND LYMPHOID SYSTEMS
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1. MORPHOLOGICAL AND...
2. GENETIC STUDIES IN...
3. SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION...
4. THE BCL-2 PROTEIN...
5. THE p53 PROTEIN
6. THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ROLES...
7. THE INFLUENCE OF...
8. ALTERED EXPRESSION OF...
9. DELETION AND MUTATION...
10. THE CHIMERIC BCR/ABL...
11. CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATIONS...
PERSPECTIVES
REFERENCES

During hematopoiesis, the survival of progenitor cells is regulated both positively and negatively by a complex, interacting network of cytokines and adhesion molecules.84 Noncycling primitive CD34+ human hematopoietic progenitors require the continuous presence of IL-3 or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for survival in vitro. In contrast, other cytokines including IL-6 and IL-11 trigger proliferation of these progenitors.85 Stem cell factor, Flt ligand, and IL-3 suppress apoptosis in single-cell assays designed to test the direct actions of cytokines on primitive progenitors. Thrombopoietin is more effective in preventing apoptosis than any of these cytokines.86 Cytokines show target cell selectivity in preventing apoptosis. For example, stem cell factor selectively promotes survival of primitive hematopoietic cells, whereas IL-3 blocks cell death in more committed progenitors.87 Flt ligand is selective for progenitors committed to the myeloid lineage.88

Other cytokines promote the apoptotic death of both primitive and committed progenitors.84 The flt3 ligand-mediated survival of primitive progenitors is counteracted by both transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta ) and TNF-alpha .89 Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma ) suppresses the survival of long-term culture-initiating cells. The action of IFN-gamma is more potent when this cytokine is secreted by stromal cells in culture than when added to the medium, stressing the importance of the hematopoietic microenvironement in modulating survival.90 Induction of apoptosis by both IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha may be mediated in part by increasing expression of FAS on the surface of hematopoietic progenitors.91 Subsequent ligation of this death receptor then triggers cell killing.

Primitive bone marrow B-lymphoid progenitors require direct contact with bone marrow stromal cells for survival.92 These survival-promoting interactions are dependent on interactions between the beta 1 integrins VLA-4 and VLA-5 expressed on the B-cell surface and fibronectin generated by the fibroblasts.93 It is unclear whether interactions between these adhesion molecules directly generate survival signals or whether the close juxtaposition of the lymphoid progenitors to fibroblasts enhances the actions of unidentified survival factor generated by the fibroblasts.

Apoptotic death of progenitor cells following deprivation of survival factors is an active rather than a passive process. Hematopoietic cells from p53 "knockout" mice are more resistant to the induction of apoptosis after factor withdrawal than are corresponding cells from control animals.94 Murine 32Dc13 myeloid precursor cells depend on IL-3 for survival in vitro. Withdrawal of IL-3 results in apoptotic death, which is dependent on the expression of wild-type p53,95 suggesting that the activation of a cell-intrinsic pathway involving p53 is a prerequisite for cell killing after removal of survival factors.

Cytokines modulate both the basal survival of some leukemia cell lines and also compromise their killing by cytotoxic treatments.84 G-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-3, IL-6, or IFN-gamma protect murine myeloid leukemia cell lines from apoptotic death induced by cytotoxic drugs.96,97 Apoptosis induced by the introduction of wild-type p53 into a p53-negative murine AML cell line is abrogated by IL-6,98 suggesting that cell killing on deprivation of this cytokine proceeds via a p53-mediated pathway.

The generation of the recognition repertoires of T and B lymphocytes is dependent on the apoptotic deletion of cells with inappropriate specificities.99 Killing of cells after ligation of FAS or the receptor proceeds via induction of apoptosis.19 Activation of T lymphocytes after encounters with cognate antigen/major histocompatibility complexes (MHC) results in activation and concomitant upregulation of FAS ligand. Subsequent interactions between FAS ligand and FAS induces apoptotic death of the activated T cells, thereby downregulating the immune response. Elimination of autoreactive B lymphocytes is also mediated by the FAS system.19 Triggerring of specific cytotoxic T cells by viral antigens displayed at the surface of target cells induces expression of FAS ligand. Interaction of the ligand with FAS expressed by the target cell initiates apoptosis.19 Cytotoxic T lymphocytes also kill target cells via the perforin/granzyme system (section 3.4).


    7. THE INFLUENCE OF GENETIC AND MICROENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ON APOPTOSIS INDUCTION IN LEUKEMIA CELLS
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1. MORPHOLOGICAL AND...
2. GENETIC STUDIES IN...
3. SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION...
4. THE BCL-2 PROTEIN...
5. THE p53 PROTEIN
6. THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ROLES...
7. THE INFLUENCE OF...
8. ALTERED EXPRESSION OF...
9. DELETION AND MUTATION...
10. THE CHIMERIC BCR/ABL...
11. CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATIONS...
PERSPECTIVES
REFERENCES

Treatment of leukemia cell lines with cytotoxic drugs results in the release of cytochrome c43-45 and the activation of caspases.100,101 Caspases are also activated after cytotoxic treatment of freshly isolated B chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (B-CLL) cells.102 However, the mechanisms that couple DNA damage to more downstream regulatory events are largely unclear. Evidence of a largely circumstantial nature suggests that some of the mechanisms of apoptosis control described in sections 3, 4, and 5 are deregulated in leukemia cells, thus contributing to their abnormal expansion and, in some cases, to drug and radiation resistance. Deregulation of apoptosis results from translocations involving genes that encode cell death-regulating proteins. However, microenvironmental factors also impinge on both the basal survival of leukemia cells and their killing by cytotoxic regimes. Some of this evidence is summarized next.


    8. ALTERED EXPRESSION OF BCL-2 IN LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1. MORPHOLOGICAL AND...
2. GENETIC STUDIES IN...
3. SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION...
4. THE BCL-2 PROTEIN...
5. THE p53 PROTEIN
6. THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ROLES...
7. THE INFLUENCE OF...
8. ALTERED EXPRESSION OF...
9. DELETION AND MUTATION...
10. THE CHIMERIC BCR/ABL...
11. CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATIONS...
PERSPECTIVES
REFERENCES

8.1. Translocation of the BCL-2 gene in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).   The t(14;18) chromosomal translocation associated with NHL results in the juxtaposition of the BCL-2 gene to the Ig heavy chain (IgH) locus.103 Translocation results in enhanced levels of BCL-2 mRNA, which may be partially attributable to the presence of a powerful transcriptional enhancer in the IgH locus.98 The efficiency of splicing of BCL-2 exons is also increased as a result of their fusion to Ig gene introns in t(14;18) cells. The resulting increase in cellular levels of spliced BCL-2 open reading frames also contributes to the upregulation of BCL-2 protein levels in NHL cells.104 Transgenic mice carrying a BCL-2 gene expressed via the IgH gene enhancer overexpress BCL-2 specifically in B-lymphoid cells. These mice accumulate abnormal numbers of small, nonproliferating B cells that show extended survival in vitro.105,106 BCL-2 overexpression alone is insufficient for lymphomagenesis. However, doubly transgenic mice in which overexpression of both BCL-2 and c-MYC is targetted to B-lymphoid cells rapidly develop tumors originating from primitive lymphoid-committed lymphoid cells, suggesting that a second genetic event is necessary for the malignant transformation of lymphocytes overexpressing BCL-2.106

Enforced overexpression of the BCL-2 or BCL-XL gene in leukemia cell lines confers increased resistance to cytotoxic drugs.107-109 However, low-grade NHL patients with increased BCL-2 expression respond well to chemotherapy, although complete remissions are rare.110 Although it is likely that overexpression of BCL-2 impairs apoptosis induction in follicular lymphoma cells, additional microenvironemental signals are required to maintain cell viability. NHL cells remain viable for 1 to 2 days in culture and then die rapidly.111 Cell death is preceded by the downregulation of BCL-XL expression, although BCL-2 expression is maintained. Both the decrease in BCL-XL and cell death are prevented by ligation of CD40, suggesting that continuous signaling by this cell-surface molecule is required to maintain viability of the lymphoma cells via upregulation of BCL-XL expression.111 BCL-2 antisense oligodeoxynucleotides have been used in the treatment of nine patients with relapsed NHL. A reduction in tumor mass was observed in two patients and a decrease in circulating tumor cells in two others. In two of five samples that were studied by flow cytometry, a decrease in BCL-2 protein levels was detected after treatment.112

NHL cells express variable levels of cell-surface FAS, but are resistant to killing after FAS ligation. Therefore, loss of sensitivity to this apoptotic pathway may contribute to the expansion of the lymphoma cells by allowing their escape from normal immune regulatory mechanisms.113

8.2. BCL-2 expression in CLL.   CLL cells show an extended life span in vivo. They proliferate very slowly, suggesting that a failure to die by apoptosis contributes to the accumulation of malignant cells in this disease.114 Translocations of the BCL-2 gene to Ig loci are detected in less than 2% of CLL cases.115 Nevertheless, CLL cells from some patients express high levels of BCL-2 protein compared with BAX.116,117 In vitro, malignant cells isolated from 30% of CLL cases survive for several weeks in the absence of added cytokines.118 However, malignant cells from the remaining 70% of patients undergo rapid apoptosis in culture, but are protected by the addition of cytokines including IL-4 and IFN-alpha or -gamma .118-122 IL-4 and IFN-alpha may promote CLL cell survival by preventing loss of expression of BCL-2 in vitro.118-120 Interaction with bone marrow stroma, which is mediated by the beta 1 and beta 2 integrins, also maintains viability of CLL cells.123,124 Normal B cells do not adhere to stroma and are not protected from apoptosis. Therefore, upregulation of integrins on the surface of CLL cells relative to normal B cells may contribute to their extended life span in vivo, via the activation of unknown intracellular pathways.

The ratio of BCL-2 to BAX correlates inversely with the sensitivity of B-CLL cells to cytotoxic drugs in vitro.116,117 However, in vitro sensitivity to fludarabine failed to correlate with the achievement of clinical response.125 In a limited study of 58 CLL patients, high levels of the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family member MCL-1 were found to correlate significantly with a failure to achieve complete remission.125

8.3. BCL-2 expression by acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells.   Genetic changes that directly result in augmented expression of BCL-2 have not been described in AML. However, those AML patients in which greater than 20% of blasts express detectable BCL-2 levels show shorter survival and lower rates of achievement of complete remission compared with patients whose malignant cells express low BCL-2 levels.126 Immunohistochemical staining of BCL-2 is more intense in malignant cells from AML patients who fail to achieve remission than in those who respond to chemotherapy.127 Malignant cells from patients showing high BCL-2 expression are drug resistant in vitro.128 Therefore, high BCL-2 expression, resulting from unknown mechanisms, may confer drug resistance on AML cells. However, other mechanisms may also confer protection even in the absence of high BCL-2 expression, because some AML isolates with low BCL-2 expression are also drug-resistant in vitro.128 Elevated expression of MCL-1 at relapse suggests that cytotoxic regimes may result in the selection of AML clones expressing high levels of this anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family protein.129

Incubation of AML blasts with antisense oligonucleotides designed to decrease BCL-2 expression increases their sensitivity to cytosine arabinoside in vitro,130 emphasizing the potential importance of this protein in conferring drug resistance to these cells.

The expression of BCL-2 by the malignant cells of ALL patients at presentation is highly variable. However, BCL-2 expression does not correlate either with the ability of the ALL cells to survive in vitro or with the response of the patients to intensive chemotherapy.131 Therefore, it is likely that other factors play important roles in modulating the survival of ALL cells. Interactions between B-lineage ALL cells and stromal fibroblasts, mediated by interactions between beta 1 integrins and fibronectin, promote the survival of the leukemia cells.92,93 The intracellular pathways of survival promotion triggerred by these interactions are, however, unknown.


    9. DELETION AND MUTATION OF THE p53 TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE IN LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1. MORPHOLOGICAL AND...
2. GENETIC STUDIES IN...
3. SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION...
4. THE BCL-2 PROTEIN...
5. THE p53 PROTEIN
6. THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ROLES...
7. THE INFLUENCE OF...
8. ALTERED EXPRESSION OF...
9. DELETION AND MUTATION...
10. THE CHIMERIC BCR/ABL...
11. CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATIONS...
PERSPECTIVES
REFERENCES

Deletion and/or mutation of p53 alleles results in the generation of tumors with impaired expression of functional p53 protein.63 The distribution of p53 mutations in human leukemia, which has been extensively reviewed 132, will be briefly summarized here. In general, p53 alterations are more frequent in aggressive disease and are associated with drug resistance and poor survival.

9.1. p53 mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes, CML, and CLL.   p53 changes are seen in 4% of myelodysplastic syndromes and are more frequent in advanced stages.132 p53 mutations are rare in the chronic phase of CML but are more frequent in blast crisis.133 p53 mutations are detected in 10% to 15% of CLL and are associated with poor response to therapy and shorter survival.134-136 Mutations are more frequent (about 40%) in Richter's immunoblastic transformation.137 However, sensitivity of B-CLL cells to camptothecin analogs or fludarabine in vitro did not correlate with the presence of p53 mutations.116

9.2. p53 mutations in lymphoma and ALL.   A high proportion (30%) of Burkitt's lymphoma and 55% of its leukemic counterpart, L3 ALL, harbor p53 mutations in addition to translocation and overexpression of the MYC oncogene.137 The transformation of follicular lympho