Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bernstein, I. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bernstein, I. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Transplantation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, Vol. 93 No. 2 (January 15), 1999: pp. 737-745

Marrow Ablative and Immunosuppressive Effects of 131I-Anti-CD45 Antibody in Congenic and H2-Mismatched Murine Transplant Models

By Dana C. Matthews, Paul J. Martin, Cynthia Nourigat, Frederick R. Appelbaum, Darrell R. Fisher, and Irwin D. Bernstein

From the Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; the Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Targeted hematopoietic irradiation delivered by 131I-anti-CD45 antibody has been combined with conventional marrow transplant preparative regimens in an effort to decrease relapse. Before increasing the proportion of therapy delivered by radiolabeled antibody, the myeloablative and immunosuppressive effects of such low dose rate irradiation must be quantitated. We have examined the ability of 131I-anti-CD45 antibody to facilitate engraftment in Ly5-congenic and H2-mismatched murine marrow transplant models. Recipient B6-Ly5a mice were treated with 30F11 antibody labeled with 0.1 to 1.5 mCi 131I and/or total body irradiation (TBI), followed by T-cell-depleted marrow from Ly5b-congenic (C57BL/6) or H2-mismatched (BALB/c) donors. Engraftment was achieved readily in the Ly5-congenic setting, with greater than 80% donor granulocytes and T cells after 0.5 mCi 131I (estimated 17 Gy to marrow) or 8 Gy TBI. A higher TBI dose (14 Gy) was required to achieve engraftment of H2-mismatched marrow, and engraftment occurred in only 3 of 11 mice receiving 1.5 mCi 131I delivered by anti-CD45 antibody. Engraftment of H2-mismatched marrow was achieved in 22 of 23 animals receiving 0.75 mCi 131I delivered by anti-CD45 antibody combined with 8 Gy TBI. Thus, targeted radiation delivered via 131I-anti-CD45 antibody can enable engraftment of congenic marrow and can partially replace TBI when transplanting T-cell-depleted H2-mismatched marrow.
© 1999 by The American Society of Hematology.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

BONE MARROW transplantation has been used for more than two decades to treat hematologic malignancies and aplastic anemia and, more recently, genetic diseases such as thalassemia and sickle cell anemia.1-6 However, the success of marrow transplantation has been limited by the high relapse rates seen in patients transplanted for advanced malignancies, by the toxicity of preparative regimens, and by the lack of HLA-identical family member donors for most patients. In principle, these limitations could be addressed by the use of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) to increase the irradiation to lymphohematopoietic tissues while minimizing the exposure of normal organs. First, delivery of more irradiation to sites of leukemic involvement should decrease the risk of relapse. Second, targeted irradiation of lymphohematopoietic organs should decrease the need for high-dose chemotherapy or total body irradiation (TBI) to prevent rejection of the allogeneic graft. Alternatively, adding targeted irradiation to full-dose systemic therapy could enhance the level of immunosuppression, thereby decreasing the risk of rejection of marrow from HLA-mismatched or unrelated donors, especially when the marrow has been depleted of T cells to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

We have shown that infusion of radiolabeled antibodies against CD45 delivers irradiation selectively to lymphohematopoietic tissues.7-9 Significant supplemental doses of radiation have been delivered to bone marrow and spleen in combination with conventional marrow transplant preparative regimens without excessive toxicity, and the relapse rates after these novel preparative regimens have been low in preliminary studies. In the initial clinical studies, treatment with radiolabeled antibody was combined with standard preparative regimens containing cyclophosphamide and either TBI9,10 or busulfan,11 because it is unknown whether the relatively low dose rate radiation delivered by antibody has sufficient antileukemic efficacy to prevent relapse and sufficient immunosuppressive activity to prevent rejection of allogeneic marrow.

Radiolabeled antibody delivers radiation at an exposure rate that is one to two orders of magnitude lower than the rate normally delivered from an external beam source. Several studies have demonstrated the influence of exposure rate on the amount of irradiation required to achieve engraftment.12-15 van Os et al14,15 compared exposure rates ranging from 0.5 to 40 cGy/min in a variety of murine transplant models. In a congenic donor and recipient strain combination that differed by a single nonimmunogenic marker, 5.5 Gy TBI delivered at 40 cGy/min was sufficient to allow 80% engraftment in 50% of the recipients. In the same model with TBI delivered at 2 cGy/min, a 7 Gy exposure was needed to achieve the same degree of engraftment.15 In an H2-compatible strain combination with disparity for multiple minor histocompatibility antigens, 6 Gy TBI delivered at 40 cGy/min was sufficient to allow engraftment. In the same model with TBI delivered at 2 cGy/min, an 8 Gy exposure was needed.14 With T-cell-depleted marrow from H2-mismatched donors, the difference between low and high dose rate was at least 6 Gy, because full engraftment at the high-dose rate (40 cGy/min) occurred after 10 Gy, but long-term engraftment did not occur after 16 Gy (the highest dose tested) delivered at 2 cGy/min.14 These results suggest that hematopoietic stem cells and precursors of cellular immunity have a substantial ability to repair irradiation damage.

Little is known about the relative biologic effects of low dose rate radiation resulting from the administration of radiolabeled antibody. To address this issue, we initiated studies using 131I-labeled anti-CD45 antibody, with or without external beam TBI, as a preparative regimen in two models of murine transplantation. To measure marrow ablation, B6-Ly5a recipients were transplanted with marrow from congenic Ly5b donors.16,17 In this model, the donor and recipient disparity is limited to CD45 allotype and does not evoke a cellular immune response.18 In an approach designed to test the immunosuppressive effects of the regimen, the same recipients (H2b) were transplanted with T-cell-depleted marrow from H2-mismatched (H2d) BALB/c donors. Our results demonstrate that irradiation delivered solely by 131I-anti-CD45 antibody allows engraftment of marrow in Ly5-congenic recipients but not in H2-mismatched recipients, where both natural killer (NK) cells and T cells are known to cause rejection. However, engraftment of T-depleted H2-mismatched marrow could be accomplished by adding low-dose external beam TBI to the radiation delivered by 131I-anti-CD45 antibody.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Mice.   Male B6-Ly5a mice were bred at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (Seattle, WA) and housed under specific pathogen-free conditions with acidified water and autoclaved chow. C57BL/6 and BALB/c donors were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and were 6 to 12 weeks old at the initiation of each experiment.

MoAbs.   MoAbs GK1.5 (rat IgG2b anti-CD4), 30-H12 (rat IgG2b anti-thy1.2), and 2.34 (rat IgG2b anti-CD8) were prepared from culture supernatants of cells lines obtained from ATCC (GK1.5 and 2.34) or Dr Jeffrey Ledbetter (Bristol Meyers Squibb, Seattle, WA; 30-H12). A hybridoma cell line secreting MoAb 30F11 (rat IgG2b), which recognizes all murine CD45 isoforms, was the gift of Dr Ledbetter. Hybridoma cell lines secreting MoAbs A20 (murine IgG2a), which recognizes the Ly5.1 epitope encoded by the Ly5a allotype of murine CD45, and 104 (murine IgG2a), which recognizes the Ly5.2 epitope encoded by the Ly5b allotype of murine CD45, were the gift of Dr Shoji Kimura (Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY). Ascites containing each MoAb was produced in BALB/c mice under specific pathogen-free conditions. Batch extraction and purification of antibodies from ascites was performed using Abx exchange resin (J.T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ) and high-pressure liquid chromatography (Biosys 510 Beckman, Fullerton, CA).

Iodination and characterization.   Antibodies were iodinated with Na125I or Na131I (ICN, Irvine, CA) using the Iodogen method19 for trace labeling and the chloramine T-labeling method for high specific activity labeling.20 The immunoreactivity (percentage of counts able to bind at antigen excess) of each preparation was determined by incubating antibody at low concentration (5 ng/mL) with 1.0 × 106 to 3 × 107 B6-Ly5a splenocytes for 1 hour at room temperature and measuring unbound antibody as previously described.21 Preparations with less than 70% immunoreactivity were not used.

Antibody localization and estimation of radiation absorbed doses.   The double isotope labeling method of Pressman22 was used to determine the biodistribution of 30F11 antibody as previously described.8 Animals were injected via tail vein with 200 µL volume containing 100 µg of antibody labeled with 131I (specific activity, 1 µCi/µg) and an equal amount of rat IgG (Sigma Immunochemical, St Louis, MO) labeled with 125I. Groups of 5 mice were killed at multiple time points from 1 to 96 hours after injection, and multiple tissues were sampled. The 125I and 131I contents of weighed samples and standard samples of the injection mix were determined by multichannel gamma counting (Packard 5000 Autogamma counter; Packard Instrument Co, Downers Grove, IL). Counting data were adjusted for cross-over from the 131I channel to the 125I channel and were corrected for decay.

Time-activity curves were constructed for each organ from the data on the percentage injected dose per gram (% ID/g) at each time point, and the infinite-time integral was calculated for the area under the curve to estimate the total number of disintegrations for dosimetry assuming that both 30F11 antibody and Rat IgG were labeled with 131I. Absorbed fractions of beta -particle energy for 131I were calculated by applying electron transport theory (EGS423) to a dosimetric model for the laboratory mouse.24,25 This model accounts for the size, shape, position, and density of organs, as well as for the overlap and contact from surrounding organs and tissues. The absorbed fractions included contributions from same-organ irradiation as well as from cross-organ irradiation. Contributions to the absorbed dose from 131I penetrating gamma radiation in mouse organs were negligible (<1% of the total dose) and were neglected. The femoral marrow was assumed to be a cylinder of 0.5 mm in radius; therefore, only a proportion (46%) of the radioiodine present in marrow was assumed to deposit its energy inside the marrow. The beta -particle absorbed fraction for lymph nodes was estimated to be 73%. Results were expressed as gray (Gy) per millicurie (mCi) 131I.

Bone marrow transplantation.   Four days before marrow infusion, groups of 6 recipient B6-Ly5a mice were treated with 100 µg of 30F11 antibody labeled with varying amounts of 131I at a maximum specific activity of 1.5 mCi 131I/100 µg. Cages were changed every other day for 1 week to decrease the irradiation from excreted urine in the cage bedding. External beam TBI was administered on the day of marrow infusion and was delivered at 0.2 Gy/min from dual 60Cobalt sources (J.L. Shepherd Co, San Fernando, CA).

Marrow cells were treated with hemolytic buffer and T cells were depleted by complement-mediated lysis with antibodies against CD4, CD8, and Thy-1, a method that routinely depleted 97% to 99% of T cells (data not shown). A marrow cell dose of 1.0 × 107 nucleated cells (counted before T-cell depletion) was injected via tail vein. This moderately high cell dose was selected to be certain that cell dose was not a limiting factor for engraftment, especially considering that some residual radiolabeled antibody remains in hematopoietic tissues at 96 hours after antibody administration when the marrow was infused. The marrow was depleted of T cells in all experiments to allow comparison between Ly5-congenic and H2-mismatched transplants. H2 disparity provides a rigorous test of immunosuppression, and T-cell depletion allows recipients to survive without lethal or debilitating GVHD.

Assessment of engraftment.   Mice were examined daily for survival and for signs of GVHD or other illness. At 4, 8, and 12 weeks posttransplant, orbital blood samples were stained with 50 µL of biotinylated A20 (anti-Ly5.1) antibody or biotinylated 104 (anti-Ly5.2) antibody at 100 µg/mL for 30 minutes followed by phycoerythrin-streptavidin (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated CD3-specific antibody (PharMingen). Control samples consisted of cells from unmanipulated mice of both donor and host strains. Samples were analyzed by flow cytometry using a FACScan (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Lymphocyte and granulocyte populations were defined by forward and 90° scatter characteristics. The lymphocyte population was analyzed separately using two colors to distinguish CD3+ T cells and CD3- B cells.


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Biodistribution of 131I-anti-CD45 antibody and estimation of radiation absorbed doses.   B6.Ly5a mice were injected with a 100 µg dose of trace 131I-labeled anti-CD45 MoAb 30F11 or 125I-labeled rat IgG and the amount of isotope in major organs was determined. The resulting time-activity curves demonstrated greater uptake and retention of radiolabeled anti-CD45 antibody in spleen, lymph nodes, and marrow as compared with the lung, the normal nontarget organ with the highest concentration (Fig 1A). The corresponding time-activity curves for 125I-labeled rat IgG (ie, IgG purified from sera of normal rats), used as a nonspecific control, did not show any specific retention in spleen, lymph nodes, or marrow (Fig 1B). Anti-CD45 antibody was cleared from the blood far more rapidly than control rat IgG, presumably by rapid binding of circulating antibody to CD45 on readily accessible cells in spleen and marrow (Fig 1C).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Biodistribution of 100 µg dose of trace-labeled 30F11 antibody (A) and polyclonal rat IgG (B). Data points represent the mean percentage of injected dose per gram ± SD for groups of 5 animals. (C) Whole blood concentrations of 30F11 and polyclonal rat IgG over 96 hours after injection.

Estimates of absorbed irradiation doses delivered to target and normal organs by 30F11 antibody or polyclonal rat IgG, assuming they were labeled with 131I, were calculated using the time-activity curves for each tissue (Table 1). The estimated absorbed irradiation delivered to spleen, lymph nodes, and bone marrow by a 100 µg dose of antibody 30F11 labeled with 1 mCi 131I was, respectively, 6.5-, 4.0-, and 2.1-fold greater than that delivered to lung. When 131I was delivered from polyclonal rat IgG, the spleen, bone marrow, and lymph nodes all absorbed less irradiation than the lung and absorbed approximately the same amount of irradiation as the liver and kidney. The higher estimated irradiation absorbed by nontarget organs after administration of 131I-rat IgG as compared with 131I-30F11 antibody reflects the slower clearance of 131I-rat IgG from the blood.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Estimated Radiation Absorbed Doses (Gy/mCi 131I) for 30F11 Antibody and Rat IgG

Estimated absorbed irradiation rates varied between tissues and over time for a given tissue, as shown in Fig 2 for 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mCi of 131I. For antibody labeled with 1.0 mCi of 131I, the highest irradiation rate for a hematopoietic tissue was 3 cGy/min in the spleen between 4 and 24 hours after infusion. Maximum lymph node dose rates ranged from 1.3 to 1.5 cGy/min. For brachial lymph nodes, 75% of the total estimated irradiation was absorbed at a rate of at least 1 cGy/min. For marrow, 86% of the total dose was absorbed at an estimated rate of at least 0.6 cGy/min.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Estimated radiation dose rate and total Gy delivered by 100 µg 30F11 antibody labeled with three different 131I doses for spleen (A), bone marrow (B), brachial lymph node (C), and lung (D). The estimated irradiation delivered to each organ between experimental time points was divided by the length of the time interval to calculate dose rates.

Engraftment of congenic marrow after 131I-30F11 antibody or TBI.   In the initial experiments with C57BL/6 donors and congenic B6-Ly5a recipients, we administered a 100 µg dose of 30F11 antibody labeled with 0 (ie, unlabeled antibody), 0.5, 1.0, 1.25, and 1.5 mCi of 131I, followed 4 days later by injection of T-cell-depleted marrow or medium alone. All mice receiving marrow survived, whereas 2 of 6 mice treated with 1.25 mCi 131I and 4 of 6 treated with 1.5 mCi 131I and no marrow died between 11 and 15 days after radiolabeled antibody injection (data not shown). Although postmortem examinations were not performed, death at these time points after delivery of radiation is consistent with death from marrow aplasia. All mice receiving at least 0.5 mCi 131I-anti-CD45 antibody demonstrated successful engraftment (Table 2). Myeloid engraftment occurred within 4 weeks posttransplant, but full T-cell engraftment did not occur until 12 weeks, presumably reflecting delayed disappearance of recipient T cells.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Engraftment of Congenic Marrow in Mice After 131I-Anti-CD45 Antibody

In subsequent experiments, mice received varying doses of TBI or a broader range of 131I doses before infusion of T-cell-depleted congenic marrow. A near-linear relationship between radiation dose and engraftment of donor marrow was found for 131I doses of up to 0.5 mCi (Fig 3) and TBI doses of up to 8 Gy (Fig 4). Fifty percent engraftment of granulocytes, B cells, and T cells was observed after treatment with 0.2 to 0.3 mCi of 131I-labeled antibody, which corresponded to an estimated marrow radiation dose of 7 to 10 Gy. Engraftment after 8 Gy TBI (dose rate, 20 cGy/min) was equivalent to engraftment after 0.5 mCi of 131I delivered via 30F11 antibody, with 80% donor cells. The estimated irradiation absorbed by marrow after treatment with 0.5 mCi of 131I on 100 µg 30F11 was approximately 17 Gy, more than twice the 8 Gy required when the irradiation was delivered by external beam.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Engraftment of T-cell-depleted C57BL/6 marrow in B6-Ly5a recipients treated with 100 µg of 30F11 antibody labeled with 0.1 to 1.0 mCi 131I. Proportion of granulocytes (A), B cells (B), and T cells (C) of donor origin (mean ± SD) 3 months after transplantation.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Engraftment of T-cell-depleted C57BL/6 marrow in B6-Ly5a recipients treated with 1 to 12 Gy TBI. Proportion of granulocytes (A), B cells (B), and T cells (C) of donor origin (mean ± SD) 3 months after transplantation.

Engraftment of T-cell-depleted H2-mismatched marrow after 131I-anti-CD45 antibody alone or with external beam TBI.   In the initial experiments with BALB/c donors and MHC-mismatched B6-Ly5a recipients, we administered either a 100 µg dose of antibody 30F11 labeled with 0.5 to 1.5 mCi of 131I on day -4 or 2 to 16 Gy TBI on day 0, followed by infusion of T-cell-depleted marrow or medium alone. With external beam TBI and no marrow infusion, the LD50 was approximately 10 Gy, and no recipients survived exposures of >= 14 Gy (data not shown). With infusion of T-cell-depleted H2-incompatible marrow, engraftment (>80% donor T cells at 3 months posttransplant) was observed in all recipients prepared with >= 14 Gy TBI delivered by external beam (Fig 5). With 131I-labeled antibody and no marrow infusion, the LD50 was between 0.5 and 1.0 mCi, and no recipients survived after administration of 1.5 mCi (data not shown). With infusion of T-cell-depleted H2-incompatible marrow, 1.5 mCi of 131I-labeled antibody was not sufficient to permit engraftment. Only 1 of 6 mice receiving the highest isotope dose had more than 80% T cells of donor origin (Fig 6A).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Engraftment of T-cell-depleted BALB/c marrow in B6-Ly5a recipients treated with 6 to 16 Gy TBI. Proportion of T cells of donor origin (mean ± SD) 3 months after transplantation. Data point labels indicate the number of mice with >= 80% donor T cells of total surviving mice (of 6 treated mice per group).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 6. Engraftment of T-cell-depleted BALB/c marrow in mice treated with 100 µg 30F11 antibody labeled with 0.5 to 1.5 mCi 131I alone (A) or combined with 4 Gy TBI (B). Proportion of T cells of donor origin (mean ± SD) 3 months after transplantation. Data point labels indicate the number of mice with >= 80% donor T cells of total surviving mice (of 6 treated mice per group).

It was not possible to deliver more irradiation with the use of 131I-30F11 antibody alone, because labeling the antibody to a specific activity higher than 15 mCi/mg impaired immunoreactivity of the antibody, and antibody doses higher than 100 µg delayed clearance from both blood and marrow, causing the infused donor marrow to be damaged by isotope persisting for more than 4 days (data not shown). To circumvent this problem, we tested the immunosuppressive effects of radiation from 131I-30F11 antibody combined with 4 Gy external beam TBI. This combined preparative regimen resulted in engraftment in most recipients treated at 131I doses of at least 1.0 mCi 131I (Fig 6B). In two experiments, 5 of 12 mice receiving 1.5 mCi survived and demonstrated donor engraftment, but the remaining 7 mice treated with 1.5 mCi died between 9 and 14 days after marrow transplant. These results suggest that the margin between immunosuppressive and toxic doses of radiation is small when high doses of radioisotope are combined with 4 Gy TBI.

In two experiments we combined 0.75 mCi of 131I-anti-CD45 antibody with TBI doses varying between 2 and 10 Gy (Fig 7). With 6 Gy TBI, engraftment was observed in 9 of 11 recipients (experiment no. 1) and 4 of 11 recipients (experiment no. 2), and with 8 Gy TBI, engraftment was observed in 12 of 12 recipients (experiment no. 1) and 10 of 11 recipients (experiment no. 2). These results suggest that the immunosuppressive effect of 131I-anti-CD45 antibody labeled with 0.75 mCi 131I can replace 6 to 8 Gy TBI in producing engraftment equivalent to that seen with 14 Gy TBI alone. A dose of 0.75 mCi 131I is estimated to deliver approximately 25 Gy to marrow, 50 Gy to lymph nodes, and 80 Gy to spleen.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 7. Engraftment of T-cell-depleted BALB/c marrow in mice treated with 100 µg 30F11 antibody labeled with 0.75 mCi 131I combined with 2 to 10 Gy TBI. Proportion of T cells of donor origin (mean ± SD) 3 months after transplantation. Data point labels indicate the number of mice with >= 80% donor T cells of total surviving mice (of 12 treated mice per group).


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

We asked if radiation delivered by 131I-labeled anti-CD45 antibody could enable engraftment of congenic marrow and of H2-incompatible marrow. Using congenic marrow, 131I-anti-CD45 antibody alone enabled engraftment, with >= 80% engraftment when antibody was labeled with >= 0.5 mCi 131I, and thus could replace TBI. When donor and recipient were H2-incompatible, 131I-anti-CD45 antibody could partially replace TBI, demonstrating its potential to permit reduction of external beam TBI and possibly provide a less toxic marrow transplant preparative regimen.

Several factors influence the relationship between radiation dose and successful engraftment, including recipient variables such as strain, health status, and presensitization to donor alloantigens26,27 and graft variables such as histocompatibility, stem cell source, cell dose, and number of T cells.12,28-36 Engraftment is also influenced by the exposure rate of irradiation and by the fractionation schedule.12-15,37-39 Delivering radiation with 131I-anti-CD45 antibody enabled engraftment of donor cells in congenic mice. All B6-Ly5a recipients treated with 0.75 mCi 131I and 3 of 6 treated with 1.0 mCi 131I conjugated to anti-CD45 antibody survived without infusion of donor marrow, demonstrating that the radiation delivered by these doses of isotope was not myeloablative and did not have fatal nonhematopoietic toxicity. Nonetheless, recipients treated with a much lower dose of 131I delivered by anti-CD45 antibody (0.3 mCi) had 60% T-cell, 70% B-cell, and 45% myeloid engraftment after infusion of Ly5-congenic marrow. Eighty percent engraftment required 8 Gy TBI or 0.5 mCi of 131I. The 17 Gy estimated irradiation absorbed by marrow delivered by antibody labeled with 0.5 mCi 131I supports the concept that radiation delivered at the low continuous dose rate and low linear energy transfer of beta -particles such as 131I has a lower relative biological efficacy (RBE) than radiation delivered at the much more rapid rate used for TBI.

Previous studies have shown that when the external beam TBI dose rate is decreased from 25 to 1 cGy/min, the LD50 for early gastrointestinal toxicity is increased from 12 to 21 Gy and the LD50 for late nonhematopoietic deaths occurring by 1 year is increased from 10 to 21 Gy in BALB/c mice supported with syngeneic marrow transplants.40 In that study, no mice treated with 20 Gy at 1 cGy/min had detectable histologic changes in the lung or kidney. In CBA mice treated with thoracic irradiation at high dose rate (180 cGy/min), the minimum dose required to produce a detectable elevation in breathing rate at 28 weeks after treatment increased from 13.8 Gy rad when the irradiation was delivered as a single fraction to 30.4 Gy when the irradiation was delivered in 7 fractions.41 In a study with beta -emitting radionuclide 90Y administered as inhaled fused aluminosilicate particles, estimated lung radiation doses up to 27 Gy did not decrease survival as compared with untreated controls.42 These results are consistent with our observations of lower RBE of radiation delivered by 131I-labeled antibody compared with equivalent doses delivered as conventional TBI.

In a transplant model demanding profound immunosuppression, engraftment of T-cell-depleted H2-mismatched marrow could not be achieved using 131I-CD45 antibody alone. Engraftment occurred in only a minority of mice receiving the highest 131I dose delivered (1.5 mCi). Several factors might explain the inability to achieve engraftment after treatment with radiolabeled antibody, despite the delivery of estimated radiation doses of almost 100 Gy to lymph nodes, 50 Gy to marrow, and 160 Gy to spleen. First, a blood-thymus barrier impeded antibody localization in the thymus, with a dose of approximately 19 Gy delivered by 1.5 mCi 131I. Second, the absorbed radiation actually delivered to cells that cause graft rejection might be less than estimated from the biodistribution studies. The estimates of absorbed dose in hematopoietic tissues represent the average for cells that are assumed to reside in that tissue for at least the first 96 hours after radiolabeled antibody infusion and do not account for heterogeneity within the tissue. T cells or NK effectors that circulate during some or all of the period of radiation delivery may thus receive a lower radiation dose. A cell that circulates during the entire period of radiation delivery will receive at least the radiation dose estimated for total body (5.9 Gy/mCi 131I). It is not possible to quantitate the additional radiation received by a circulating cell because it involves not only radiation delivered by antibody bound to the cell and to neighboring cells in circulation as well as that present in plasma (which depends on geometry of blood vessels in relationship to the path length of the isotope), but also radiation delivered during the time the cell traffics in tissues such as the spleen where greater radiation effects are present. Within lymph nodes, radiation delivery may be heterogeneous, and the amount of irradiation delivered to individual nodes could vary. Finally, cellular repair mechanisms might be able to keep pace with the rate of damage inflicted by the low radiation dose rate delivered from 131I, thereby avoiding cell death.

Our results with CD45-congenic donor/recipient pairs suggest that treatment with 131I-anti-CD45 antibody alone is sufficient to allow engraftment of donor cells at 131I doses that are well tolerated. This raises the possibility that 131I-labeled anti-CD45 antibody might provide a less toxic method for selective ablation of marrow and might enable reconstitution with autologous hematopoietic cells modified by gene therapy. Furthermore, the finding that engraftment of T-cell-depleted H2-mismatched marrow reliably occurred when 0.75 mCi of 131I-anti-CD45 antibody was combined with 8 Gy TBI suggests that targeted radiation may be able to replace nearly half of the TBI ordinarily administered in such transplants. Such an approach holds the potential for enhanced antileukemic efficacy while inducing less systemic toxicity, thereby improving the outcome after marrow transplantation for acute leukemia.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors are indebted to Minna Zheng, Jennifer Smith, and Carol Dean for their expert technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES

   Submitted April 30, 1998; accepted September 22, 1998.
   Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant No. CA01690, the Adler Foundation, and the Parker-Hughes Trust.
   The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address reprint requests to Dana C. Matthews, MD, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center D1-100, 1100 Fairview Ave N, PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109; e-mail: dmatthew{at}fhcrc.org.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Christiansen NP: Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for the treatment of adult acute leukemias. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 7:177, 1993[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Appelbaum FR: Indications for bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Leukemia 7:1081, 1993[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Brochstein JA, Kernan NA, Groshen S, Cirrincione C, Shank B, Emanuel D, Laver J, O'Reilly RJ: Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation after hyperfractionated total-body irradiation and cyclophosphamide in children with acute leukemia. N Engl J Med 317:1618, 1987[Abstract]

4. Storb R, Anasetti C, Appelbaum F, Bensinger W, Buckner CD, Clift R, Deeg HJ, Doney K, Hansen J, Loughran T, Martin P, Pepe M, Petersen F, Sanders J, Singer J, Stewart P, Sullivan KM, Witherspoon R, Thomas ED: Marrow transplantation for severe aplastic anemia and thalassemia major. Semin Hematol 28:235, 1991[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Lucarelli G, Galimberti M, Polchi P, Angelucci E, Baronciani D, Giardini C, Andreani M, Agostinelli F, Albertini F, Clift RA: Marrow transplantation in patients with thalassemia responsive to iron chelation therapy. N Engl J Med 329:840, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Walters MC, Patience M, Leisenring W, Eckman JR, Scott JP, Mentzer WC, Davies SC, Ohene-Frempong K, Bernaudin F, Matthews DC, Storb R, Sullivan KM: Bone marrow transplantation for sickle cell disease: A multicenter collaborative investigation. N Engl J Med 334:369, 1996

7. Matthews DC, Appelbaum FR, Eary JF, Hui TE, Fisher DR, Martin PJ, Durack LD, Nelp WB, Press OW, Badger CC, Bernstein ID: Radiolabeled anti-CD45 monoclonal antibodies target lymphohematopoietic tissue in the macaque. Blood 78:1864, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Matthews DC, Badger CC, Fisher DR, Hui TE, Nourigat C, Appelbaum FR, Martin PJ, Bernstein ID: Selective radiation of hematolymphoid tissue delivered by anti-CD45 antibody. Cancer Res 52:1228, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Matthews DC, Appelbaum FR, Eary JF, Fisher DR, Durack LD, Bush SA, Hui TE, Martin PJ, Mitchell D, Press OW, Badger CC, Storb R, Nelp WB, Bernstein ID: Development of a marrow transplant regimen for acute leukemia using targeted hematopoietic irradiation delivered by 131I-labeled anti-CD45 antibody, combined with cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation. Blood 85:1122, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Matthews DC, Appelbaum FR, Eary JF, Mitchell D, Press OW, Bernstein ID: Phase I study of 131I-anti-CD45 antibody plus cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation for advanced acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood 90:417a, 1997 (abstr, suppl 1)

11. Matthews DC, Appelbaum FR, Eary JF, Mitchell D, Press OW, Bernstein ID: 131I-anti-CD45 antibody plus busulfan/cyclophosphamide in matched related transplants for AML in first remission. Blood 88:142a, 1996 (abstr, suppl 1)

12. Gengozian N, Carlson DE, Allen EM: Transplantation of allogeneic and xenogeneic (rat) marrow in irradiated mice as affected by radiation exposure. Transplantation 7:259, 1969[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Down JD, Tarbell NJ, Thames HD, Mauch PM: Syngeneic and allogeneic bone marrow engraftment after total body irradiation: Dependence on dose, dose rate, and fractionation. Blood 77:661, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. van Os R, Konings AW, Down JD: Compromising effect of low dose-rate total body irradiation on allogeneic bone marrow engraftment. Int J Radiat Biol 64:761, 1993[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. van Os R, Thames HD, Konings AW, Down JD: Radiation dose-fractionation and dose-rate relationships for long-term repopulating hemopoietic stem cells in a murine bone marrow transplant model. Radiat Res 136:118, 1993[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Morse HC 3d, Shen FW, Hammerling U: Genetic nomenclature for loci controlling mouse lymphocyte antigens. Immunogenetics 25:71, 1987[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Seldin MF, D'Hoostelaere LA, Steinberg AD, Saga Y, Morse HDI: Allelic variants of Ly-5 in inbred and natural populations of mice. Immunogenetics 26:74, 1987[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Sykes M, Chester CH, Sundt TM, Romick ML, Hoyles KA, Sachs DH: Effects of T cell depletion in radiation bone marrow chimeras. III. Characterization of allogeneic bone marrow cell populations that increase allogeneic chimerism independently of graft-vs-host disease in mixed marrow recipients. J Immunol 143:3503, 1989[Abstract]

19. Badger CC, Krohn KA, Peterson AB, Shulman H, Bernstein ID: Experimental radiotherapy of murine lymphoma with 131I-labeled anti-Thy-1.1 monoclonal antibody. Cancer Res 45:1536, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Hunter WM, Greenwood FL: Preparation of I131-labeled human growth hormones of high specific activity. Nature 194:495, 1942

21. Badger CC, Krohn KA, Bernstein ID: In vitro measurement of avidity of radiodinated antibodies. Nucl Med Biol 14:605, 1987

22. Pressman D: Radiolabeled antibodies. Ann NY Acad Sci 69:644, 1957

23. Nelson WR, Hirayama H, Rogers DWO: The EGS4 Code System, Report 265. Palo Alto, CA, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, 1985.

24. Hui TE, Fisher DR, Kuhn JA, Williams LE, Nourigat C, Badger CC, Beatty BG, Beatty JD: A mouse model for calculating cross-organ beta doses from Yttrium-90-labeled immunoconjugates. Cancer 73:951, 1994[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] (suppl 3)

25. Berger MJ: Distribution of aborbed dose around point sources of electrons and beta particles in water and other media. J Nucl Med 12:5, 1971[Free Full Text]

26. Lapidot T, Terenzi A, Singer TS, Salomon O, Reisner Y: Enhancement by dimethyl myleran of donor type chimerism in murine recipients of bone marrow allografts. Blood 73:2025, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. van Os R, de Witte T, Dillingh JH, Mauch PM, Down JD: Increased rejection of murine allogeneic bone marrow in presensitized recipients. Leukemia 11:1045, 1997[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Vallera DA, Taylor PA, Sprent J, Blazar BR: The role of host T cell subsets in bone marrow rejection directed to isolated major histocompatibility complex class I versus class II differences of bm1 and bm12 mutant mice. Transplantation 57:249, 1994[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Ferrara J, Lipton J, Hellman S, Burakoff S, Mauch P: Engraftment following T-cell-depleted marrow transplantation. I. The role of major and minor histocompatibility barriers. Transplantation 43:461, 1987[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Uharek L, Gassmann W, Glass B, Steinmann J, Loeffler H, Mueller-Ruchholtz W: Influence of cell dose and graft-versus-host reactivity on rejection rates after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood 79:1612, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Martin PJ: Influence of alloreactive T cells on initial hematopoietic reconstitution after marrow transplantation. Exp Hematol 23:174, 1995[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Lapidot T, Singer TS, Salomon O, Terenzi A, Schwartz E, Reisner Y: Booster irradiation to the spleen following total body irradiation. A new immunosuppressive approach for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. J Immunol 141:2619, 1988[Abstract]

33. Rao SR, Peters SO, Crittenden RB, Stewart FM, Ramshaw HS, Quesenberry PJ: Stem cell transplantation in the normal nonmyeloablated host: Relationship between cell dose, schedule and engraftment. Exp Hematol 25:114, 1997[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Martin PJ: Donor CD8 cells prevent allogeneic marrow graft rejection in mice: Potential implications for marrow transplantation in humans. J Exp Med 178:703, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Stewart FM, Crittenden RB, Lowry PA, Pearson-White S, Quesenberry PJ: Long-term engraftment of normal and post-5 fluorouracil murine marrow into normal nonmyeloablated mice. Blood 81:2566, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Tomita Y, Sachs DH, Sykes M: Myelosuppressive conditioning is required to achieve engraftment of pluripotent stem cells contained in moderate doses of syngeneic bone marrow. Blood 83:939, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Salomon O, Lapidot T, Terenzi A, Lubin I, Rabi I, Reisner Y: Induction of donor-type chimerism in murine recipients of bone marrow allografts by different radiation regimens currently used in treatment of leukemia patients. Blood 76:1872, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Storb R, Raff RF, Appelbaum FR, Graham TC, Schuening FG, Sale G, Pepe M: Comparison of fractionated to single-dose total body irradiation in conditioning canine littermates for DLA-identical marrow grafts. Blood 74:1139, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Tarbell NJ, Amato DA, Down JD, Mauch P, Hellman S: Fractionation and dose rate effects in mice: A model for bone marrow transplantation in man. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 13:1065, 1987[Medline] [Order article via&nbs