|
|
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Blood, Vol. 93 No. 3 (February 1), 1999:
pp. 804-815
Reconstitution of the Functional Mouse Oncostatin M (OSM) Receptor:
Molecular Cloning of the Mouse OSM Receptor Subunit
By
Minoru Tanaka,
Takahiko Hara,
Neal G. Copeland,
Debra J. Gilbert,
Nancy A. Jenkins, and
Atsushi Miyajima
From the Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, University
of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; and Mammalian Genetics Laboratory, Advanced
Bioscience Laboratories (ABL)-Basic Research Program,
National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research and Development
Center, Frederick, MD.
 |
ABSTRACT |
Oncostatin M (OSM) is a member of the interleukin-6 (IL-6) family of
cytokines that share the gp130 receptor subunit. Of these family
members, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is most closely related to
OSM, and various overlapping biologic activities have been described
between human LIF and OSM (hLIF and hOSM). Two types of functional hOSM
receptors are known: the type I OSM receptor is identical to the LIF
receptor that consists of gp130 and the LIF receptor subunit
(LIFR ), and the type II OSM receptor consists of gp130 and the OSM
receptor subunit (OSMR ). It is thus conceivable that common
biologic activities between hLIF and hOSM are mediated by the shared
type I receptor and OSM-specific activities are mediated by the type II
receptor. However, in contrast to the human receptors, recent studies
have demonstrated that mouse OSM (mOSM) does not activate the type I
receptor and exhibits unique biologic activity. To elucidate the
molecular structure of the functional mOSM receptor, we cloned a cDNA
encoding mOSMR , which is 55.5% identical to the hOSMR at the
amino acid level. mOSM-responsive cell lines express high-affinity mOSM
receptors, as well as mOSMR , whereas embryonic stem cells, which are
responsive to LIF but not to mOSM, do not express mOSMR . mOSMR
alone binds mOSM with low affinity (kd = 13.0 nmol/L)
and forms a high-affinity receptor (kd = 606 pmol/L) with gp130.
Ba/F3 transfectants expressing both mOSMR and gp130 proliferated in
response to mOSM, but failed to respond to LIF and human OSM. Thus, the
cloned mOSMR constitutes an essential and species-specific receptor
component of the functional mOSM receptor. Reminiscent of the
colocalization of the mOSM and mLIF genes, the mOSMR gene was found
to be located in the vicinity of the LIFR locus in the proximal end
of chromosome 15.
© 1999 by The American Society of Hematology.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
THE INTERLEUKIN-6 (IL-6) family of
cytokines includes IL-6, IL-11, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF),
oncostatin M (OSM), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), and
cardiotrophin (CT).1-5 A unique feature of this cytokine
family is that the receptors share the gp130 receptor subunit as a
common signal transducer.6 Of the family members, LIF and
OSM are most closely related structurally7 and their genes
are colocalized.8,9 Human OSM (hOSM) and LIF also exhibit
various common biologic activities such as growth stimulation of the
DA1.a lymphoid subline,10 induction of M1 monocytic
leukemia cell differentiation,11 inhibition of embryonic stem (ES) cell differentiation,12 and induction of
acute-phase protein expression in hepatocytes.13,14 In
addition, hOSM exhibits unique activities including growth inhibition
of A375 human melanoma,15,16 growth stimulation of
Kaposi's sarcoma,17 and induction of tissue inhibitor of
metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) in fibroblasts.18 Molecular
cloning of the hOSM receptor subunit (hOSMR ) and reconstitution of
the functional hOSM receptor indicated two types of functional hOSM
receptor. The type I OSM receptor is identical to the high-affinity LIF
receptor that consists of gp130 and the LIF binding protein, LIFR .19 The type II OSM receptor consists of gp130 and
the OSM-specific receptor component, OSMR .20,21 gp130
binds hOSM with low affinity19,22,23 and forms a
high-affinity hOSM receptor with OSMR . The existence of two types of
functional hOSM receptors provides a molecular basis for the common
biologic activities between LIF and OSM, as well as OSM-specific
activities.24
The mouse OSM (mOSM) gene had long been unidentified, but it was
recently cloned as a cytokine-inducible gene.25 Biologic characterization of mOSM revealed that its activities are significantly different from those of hOSM. Recent studies have shed light on the
unique biologic activities of OSM during mouse development. First, mOSM
plays an important role in the expansion of multipotential hematopoietic progenitor cells in the aorta-gonad-mesonephros (AGM)
region of the mouse embryo at 11.5 days postcoitum (dpc),26 where definitive hematopoiesis is believed to be initiated in the mouse
embryo.27 Second, Sertoli cells in neonatal testes express
mOSM, and their proliferation is strongly stimulated by mOSM.28 Third, maturation of hepatic cells is induced by
mOSM (Kamiya et al, submitted). Interestingly, neither LIF
nor hOSM exhibit such activities.
Previously, we demonstrated that although both hOSM and LIF stimulate
proliferation of DA1.a, induce differentiation of M1 cells, and inhibit
differentiation of ES cells, none of these activities are observed with
mOSM.29 Conversely, while mOSM inhibits proliferation of a
subline of NIH3T3, neither hOSM nor LIF exhibit such activity.
Moreover, Ba/F3 transfectants expressing gp130 and LIFR proliferate
in response to either LIF or hOSM, but fail to respond to mOSM. These
results suggested that the mLIF receptor is activated equally by LIF
and hOSM, but mOSM is unable to transduce signals through the mLIF
receptor. Consistent with this hypothesis, while we could detect
high-affinity LIF receptors on LIF-responsive cell lines, no
high-affinity mOSM receptors were present on such cells. Similarly, we
found high-affinity mOSM receptors in mOSM-responsive NIH3T3 cells that
do not exhibit any LIF binding. Based on these findings, we
previously proposed that unlike hOSM, mOSM does not use the type I
receptor equivalent to the LIF receptor; instead, mOSM elicits biologic
activity only through its specific type II receptor, which is
presumably composed of gp130 and a putative mOSMR .29
In this report, we describe the molecular cloning of mOSMR
cDNA and present evidence to prove our model by reconstituting the
functional high-affinity mOSM receptor using this molecule.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells and cytokine.
Ba/F3 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum (FBS), gentamicin (50 µg/mL), and IL-3 (10 ng/mL).
M1 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS and gentamicin.
NIH3T3 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)
supplemented with 10% calf serum and gentamicin. CCE (embryonic stem
[ES] cell line) cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 15%
FBS, gentamicin, 50 µmol/L 2-mercaptoethanol, and mLIF (10 ng/mL). LO
cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 15% FBS, gentamicin, 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 1 mmol/L sodium pyruvate, and mOSM (10 ng/mL). mOSM was produced in COS7 cells and purified.29
Recombinant mouse IL-3 was produced in silkworm.30 hOSM and
mLIF were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN).
Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction cloning using
degenerated primers.
Poly A+ RNA was prepared from an OSM-dependent cell line,
LO (T. Hara, A. Miyajima, unpublished data, October 1997)
using the FastTrack kit (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two degenerated primers
were designed on the basis of homology between hOSMR and LIF (A,
5'-CA(A/G)GAAA(C/T)(A/C)(C/T)A(C/T)AA(C/T)TT(C/T)AC-3'; B,
5'-G(A/G)A(A/C)AG(A/G/T)AT(C/T)TT(A/C/G/T)CC(A/G)TT(A/G/T)GC-3'). The
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using a set of these
primers under the following conditions: denaturation for 3 minutes at
94°C before thermal cycling, denaturation for 1 minute at 94°C,
annealing for 2 minutes at 46°C, extension for 3 minutes at 72°C
for 35 cycles, and a final extension for 7 minutes at 72°C. This
program was repeated using 1 µL of the first PCR solution as the
template for the second PCR. PCR products were separated on 2% agarose
gel. DNA fragments of approximately 500 bp were isolated by the
QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen, Santa Clarita, CA)
and subcloned into the pCRII vector (Invitrogen). The sequence of
cloned DNA fragments was determined by an automated DNA sequencer
(Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
Screening of cDNA library.
cDNA libraries were constructed using polyA+ RNA from LO
cells with oligo dT primers or random primers as described
previously.31 The probe for Southern and colony
hybridization was prepared by PCRs with a NTP mixture containing
digoxigenin-UTP (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany)
according to the manufacturer's protocol. As previously
described,31 pools (1,500 independent clones per pool) of
the cDNA library were prepared in 96-well plates. DNA mixtures of each
row were subjected to Southern blot analysis to identify a positive
pool that contains a longer cDNA insert. Overlapping clones that cover
the entire open reading frame encoding mOSMR were isolated by
sibselection. 5'RACE analysis was performed using the
5'-rapid amplification of cDNA end (RACE) System for Rapid
Amplification of cDNA Ends, Version 2.0 (GIBCO-BRL, Rockville, MD) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Each
primer (5'-GGAGTCAATGGTAAAGGCTC-3' and 5'-CTCCAAGACTTCGCTTCGG-3') was
used for synthesis of first-strand cDNA and PCR, respectively.
Northern blot analysis.
PolyA+ RNA was prepared from LO, NIH3T3, M1, Ba/F3, and CCE
cells using the FastTrack kit (Invitrogen) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Standard Northern blots of 1 µg
polyA+ RNA were performed. The single-strand antisense
probe for Northern blot analysis was made as described before in the
absence of a sense primer.
Generation of Ba/F3 transfectants.
mOSMR cDNA was placed under the SR promoter of the expression
vector pME18S32 carrying the puromycin-resistant gene. As previously described,31 linearized plasmids (30 µg) were
transfected into 5 × 106 Ba/F3 cells by electroporation,
and transfectants were selected with puromycin (1 µg/mL) for 10 days.
Expression of mOSMR was confirmed by flow cytometry using
anti-mOSMR monoclonal antibody (M. Tanaka, T. Hara, A. Miyajima,
unpublished data, November 1997). A double transfectant
of Ba/F3 was established by introducing a plasmid DNA carrying gp130
cDNA and the neomycin-resistant gene into the mOSMR transfectant.
Radioiodination and binding assay.
The purified recombinant mOSM derived from COS7 cells was
radioiodinated with Iodogen (Pierce, Rockford, IL) as
previously described.33 The specific radioactivity was
determined to be 4.2 × 106 cpm/pmol by self-displacement
analysis. Scatchard analyses were performed as previously
described.34 Data for the binding assays were analyzed by
the LIGAND program.35
Chemical cross-linking experiment.
A chemical cross-linking experiment was performed as described
previously.34 In brief, LO cells
(4 × 106) were incubated in 250 µL DME-BSA (DMEM
containing 1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin [BSA] and 20 mmol/L HEPES, pH
7.4) with 5 nmol/L 125I-mOSM in the presence or absence of
a 1,000-fold excess of nonlabeled ligands at 4°C for 4 hours. Cells
collected by centrifugation at 5,000 rpm for 30 seconds were washed
with 500 µL ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) twice, and
unbound labeled ligands were removed. Cell-bound labeled ligands were
cross-linked with 1 mmol/L disuccinimidyl suberate in 200 µL 0.1 mol/L borate buffer, pH 8.0, at 4°C for 15 minutes. The reaction was
quenched by washing twice with 500 µL stopping buffer (10 mmol/L Tris
hydrochloride, pH 7.4, 0.14 mol/L NaCl, and 1 mmol/L EDTA).
Cross-linked cells were lysed and subjected to 6.5% polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)
followed by autoradiography.
Proliferation assay.
The proliferative response of Ba/F3 transfectants was examined by
colorimetric assays using
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide ([MTT]
Sigma, St Louis, MO) as described
previously.36 In brief, 104 cells were
incubated in 100 µL medium with various concentrations of mOSM in
96-well plates. After 3 days in culture, 10 µL MTT (5 mg/mL in PBS)
was added to each well and further incubated for 4 hours at 37°C.
Then, 150 µL 0.04N HCl in isopropanol was added to lyse the cells,
and the optical density at 570 nm was measured.
Interspecific mouse backcross mapping.
Interspecific backcross progeny were generated by mating
(C57BL/6J × M. spretus) F1 females and C57BL/6J
males.37 A total of 205 F2 mice were used to map the
Osmr locus (see text for details). DNA isolation, restriction
enzyme digestion, agarose gel electrophoresis, Southern blot transfer,
and hybridization were performed essentially as previously
described.38 All blots were prepared with
Hybond-N+ nylon membrane (Amersham, Arlington Heights,
IL). The probe, about 3.1 kb of XhoI/NotI
fragments of mouse cDNA, was labeled with [ 32P]dCTP
using a random primed labeling kit (Stratagene, LaJolla, CA); washing was performed to a final stringency of
0.8X SSCP and 0.1% SDS at 65°C. Fragments of 16.5, 11.5, 5.9, and 4.7 kb were detected in BglI-digested C57BL/6J
DNA, and fragments of 7.5, 7.1, 5.9, 4.6, and 3.6 kb were detected in
BglI-digested M. spretus DNA. The presence or absence
of the 7.5-, 7.1-, and 3.6-kb BglI M. spretus-specific
fragments, which cosegregated, was evaluated in backcross mice. A
description of the probes and RFLPs for the loci linked to Osmr
including Prlr, Lifr, Myo10, and Hspg1 has been
reported.8,39 Recombination distances were calculated using
Map Manager, version 2.6.5 (K. Manly and R. Cudmore, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY). Gene order was determined by minimizing the number of recombination events required to explain the allele distribution patterns.
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of mOSM receptor in LO cells.
By Scatchard analysis of mOSM binding sites on mOSM-responsive and
-nonresponsive cell lines, we previously demonstrated that mOSM did not
bind to the mLIF receptor.29 However, the molecular nature
of the mOSM receptor remained unknown. To reveal its molecular structure, we performed chemical cross-linking experiments using a
newly established cell line, LO. The LO cell line was established from
11.5 dpc mouse embryo as a mOSM-dependent cell line (T. Hara, A. Miyajima, unpublished data, October 1997). Scatchard
analysis showed two binding sites with distinct affinities,
high-affinity (kd = 259 pmol/L) and low-affinity (kd = 6.91 nmol/L;
Fig 1A). The kd value and
receptor number of the high-affinity binding site of mOSM were similar
in range to those previously reported in mOSM-sensitive NIH3T3
cells.29 Chemical cross-linking experiments using
125I-mOSM exhibited two bands of approximately 200 and 180 kD that specifically competed with nonradioactive mOSM (Fig 1B). By
subtracting the molecular mass of COS-derived mOSM (36 kD),29 the size of the two cross-linked proteins is
estimated to be approximately 160 and 140 kd. As the molecular mass of
the hOSMR was reported to be 180 kD,21 the 200- and
180-kD bands appear to represent mOSMR and gp130, respectively.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 1.
(A) Scatchard plot analyses of mOSM binding to
LO cells. LO cells were incubated with various concentrations of
125I-labeled mOSM in the presence or absence of a
1,000-fold excess of unlabeled mOSM. After 3 hours of incubation at
4°C, free mOSM was washed out through a Whatman GF/C
glass filter (Maidstone, UK), and the bound radioactivity was measured
by a gamma counter. Specific binding was obtained by subtracting
nonspecific binding from total binding. Data are plotted according to
the Scatchard transformation using the LIGAND program. Each point
represents the average of duplicate measurements. The analyses clearly
show two distinct affinities. (B) Cross-linking experiment using LO
cells. LO cells were incubated with 5 nmol/L 125I-mOSM in
the presence or absence of a 1,000-fold excess of unlabeled mOSM. After
4 hours of incubation at 4°C, cross-linked proteins were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE.
|
|
RT-PCR cloning using degenerated oligonucleotide primers.
Although we attempted to clone the mOSMR gene by standard
low-stringency hybridization using the hOSMR cDNA as a probe, we
were unable to isolate any clones with a homologous sequence. Therefore, we employed a strategy using RT-PCR with degenerated oligonucleotide primers. The failure to isolate the putative mOSMR by cross-hybridization with hOSMR implied a low overall sequence homology between the two; however, we expected that there may be some
conserved regions between them. Since the hOSMR and LIFR are
structurally related,21 we searched for regions of homology among hOSMR , hLIFR , and mLIFR by comparing the amino acid
sequences and nucleotide sequences of the three genes. Although the
amino acid similarity between hOSMR and hLIFR was relatively low
(32%), their nucleotide sequences showed significantly higher homology (50%). Therefore, we designed a pair of degenerated oligonucleotide primers that correspond to two of the most conserved regions (Fig 2B).
The RT-PCR using polyA+ RNA derived from LO cells generated
a product of the expected size. After subcloning of the DNA fragments,
one clone (ORP3-5) was found to encode a novel amino acid sequence with
58% identity to the corresponding amino acid sequence of hOSMR .

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 2.
(A) Schematic representation of the
structure of mOSMR cDNA. The 5' and 3' UTRs (solid line) and the
coding region (boxed region) containing the predicted signal sequence
(hatched box) and the transmembrane domain (filled box) are shown. The
position of cysteines and WS motifs that are conserved among the
cytokine receptor superfamily is marked. The location of three
overlapping cDNA clones isolated is also indicated. (B) Nucleotide and
predicted amino acid sequence of mOSMR . Amino acids are shown by the
one-letter code. Conserved cysteines and WS motifs are shaded.
Potential asparagine-linked glycosylation sites (NXS/T) are underlined.
The putative signal sequence and transmembrane domain are shown by a
broken line and a double underline, respectively. Primers used to clone
the cDNA are also shown as an underline with an arrow. YXXQ motifs are
boxed. (C) Comparison of amino acid sequences between mOSMR and
hOSMR . Identical amino acid residues are shown as bold letters.
|
|
Cloning of a full-length cDNA encoding mOSMR .
To isolate a full-length cDNA clone, LO cell cDNA libraries were
screened with ORP3-5 as a probe. Two positive clones (OR1C5 and OR4C6)
were obtained and their sequences determined (Fig 2B). OR1C5
and OR4C6 carried two distinct cDNAs of 2.2 kb. These two sequences
were overlapped to yield one large single open reading frame (ORF) (Fig
2A). We further cloned a 5' untranslated region (UTR) of this cDNA by
the 5'-RACE method. The ORF of the combined cDNA (2,913 bp) is
predicted to encode a polypeptide of 970 amino acid residues with a
calculated molecular weight of 110 kD (Fig 2B). There are 20 potential N-linked glycosylation sites in the extracellular domain. The
deduced protein is a member of the class I cytokine receptor
superfamily,40,41 and it shows 55.5% and 27.8% identity
at the amino acid level with hOSMR and mLIFR , respectively (Fig
2C). In the extracellular domain, there are two modified
Trp-Ser-X-Trp-Ser (WSXWS) motifs characteristic of this
family42: one is WGNWS and the other is WSDWT. Two
pairs of cysteine residues were also conserved (Fig 2B). The
cytoplasmic domain of hematopoietin receptors is also characterized by
Box1 and Box2 regions, which are critical for generating proliferation signals43-46 and are involved in the activation of the
Janus kinase (Jak) family.47-49 Box1 and Box2 regions, as
well as a Tyr-X-X-Gln (YXXQ) motif critical for the activation of
STAT3,44,46,50 are all conserved in the cytoplasmic domain
of the cloned cDNA (Fig 2B). Therefore, we considered this novel cDNA
(clone OR1C5/OR4C6) to be a strong candidate for mOSMR .
Functional reconstitution of mOSMR in Ba/F3 cell transfectant.
To confirm that the OR1C5/OR4C6 cDNA encodes a functional mOSMR
subunit, we generated Ba/F3 transfectants expressing both OR1C5/OR4C6
and gp130 or OR1C5/OR4C6 alone. Expression of both proteins on the cell
surface was confirmed by flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies
against gp130 and OR1C5/OR4C6, respectively (data not shown). Scatchard
analysis of these transfectants demonstrated that mOSM bound to the
Ba/F3 transfectant expressing mOSMR alone with low affinity
(kd = 13.0 nmol/L; Fig 3A), whereas it
was able to bind to the double transfectant with high affinity
(kd = 606 pmol/L; Fig 3C). The direct binding of mOSM to mOSMR was
confirmed by chemical cross-linking experiments using Ba/F3
transfectants (Fig 3B). Furthermore, the double transfectant
proliferated in response to mOSM, but not to hOSM and mLIF, in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig 3D). On the other hand, transfectants
expressing either mOSMR or gp130 alone never responded to mOSM even
in the presence of high concentrations (> 100 ng/mL) of mOSM (data
not shown). These results confirmed that the OR1C5/OR4C6 cDNA encodes
mOSMR and the functional mOSMR consists of gp130 and mOSMR .

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 3.
Reconstitution of OSM receptor in Ba/F3 cells. (A)
Scatchard plot analysis of Ba/F3 transfectant expressing only mOSMR ;
mOSM binds only to mOSMR with low affinity. (B) Chemical
cross-linking experiment using Ba/F3 transfectant expressing only
mOSMR ; 125I-mOSM binds to mOSMR specifically. (C)
Scatchard plot analysis of Ba/F3 transfectant expressing mOSMR and
gp130; double transfectant exhibits high- and low-affinity binding
sites. (D) Growth stimulation of transfectant expressing mOSMR and
gp130 responding to various ligands. Double transfectant proliferates
in a mOSM-dependent manner, while neither hOSM nor mLIF stimulate its
growth.
|
|
Expression of mOSMR mRNA.
The distribution of mOSMR mRNA was analyzed by Northern blotting. A
single band of 5.2 kb corresponding to mOSMR mRNA was detected in LO
cells and NIH3T3 cells; no such mRNA was present in Ba/F3 cells, M1
cells, and CCE embryonic stem cells (Fig
4A). Next, we examined mOSMR mRNA
expression in various tissues of adult mice by Northern blotting. We
found that mOSMR was widely distributed in all tissues examined. The
expression level was highest in the lung, heart, thymus, and spleen
(Fig 4B). However, mOSM expression is undetectable in the liver, lung,
small intestine, kidney, and brain, and is inducible by cytokines in
hematopoietic cells.25 Therefore, in these tissues of adult
mice, it is likely that the mOSMR responds to OSM produced during an
inflammatory process.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 4.
Expression of mOSMR mRNA. (A) Northern blot analyses
of mOSMR mRNA in various cell lines. PolyA+ RNAs were
prepared from various cell lines, and 1 µg of each sample was
subjected to Northern blot analysis: lane 1, LO cells; lane 2, NIH3T3
cells; lane 3, Ba/F3 cells; lane 4, CCE cells; lane 5, M1 cells. (B)
Northern blot analyses of mOSMR mRNA in various adult tissues; 1 µg of each sample was subjected to Northern blot analyses: lane 1, brain; lane 2, lung; lane 3, heart; lane 4, liver; lane 5, kidney; lane
6, small intestine; lane 7, muscle; lane 8, thymus; lane 9, spleen;
lane 10, LO cells (upper panel). The middle panel shows the long
exposure of the upper panel. The lower panel demonstrates equal loading
by rehybridization with the GAPDH probe.
|
|
Chromosomal mapping of the OSMR gene.
The mouse chromosomal location of Osmr was determined by
interspecific backcross analysis using progeny derived from mice matings ([C57BL/6 × M. spretus] F1 × C57BL/6J). This
interspecific backcross mapping panel has been typed for over 2,600 loci that are well distributed among all autosomes, as well as the X
chromosome.37 C57BL/6J and M. spretus DNAs were
digested with several enzymes and analyzed by Southern blot
hybridization for informative RFLPs using a mouse cDNA probe. The 7.5-, 7.1-, and 3.6-kb BglI M. spretus RFLPs were used to
follow the segregation of the Osmr locus in backcross mice. The
mapping results indicated that Osmr is located in the proximal
region of mouse chromosome 15 linked to Prlr, Lifr, Myo10, and
Hspg1. Although 127 mice were analyzed for every marker and are
shown in the segregation analysis (Fig 5),
up to 174 mice were typed for some pairs of markers. Each locus was analyzed in pairwise combinations for recombination frequencies using
the additional data. The ratio for the total number of mice exhibiting
recombinant chromosomes to the total number of mice analyzed for each
pair of loci and the most likely gene order are as follows:
centromere Prlr-0/174-Osmr-0/172-Lifr-7/168-Myo10-7/144-Hspg1. The recombination frequencies (expressed as genetic distance in centimorgans [cM] ± SE) are as follows: [Prlr, Osmr,
Lifr] 4.2 ± 1.5-Myo10-4.9 ± 1.8-Hspg1. No
recombinants were detected between Prlr and Osmr in 174 animals typed in common and between Osmr and Lifr in
172 animals typed in common, suggesting that the two loci within each
pair are within 1.7 cM of each other (upper 95% confidence limit).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 5.
Osmr maps in the proximal region of mouse
chromosome 15. Osmr was placed on mouse chromosome 15 by
interspecific backcross analysis. The segregation patterns of
Osmr and flanking genes in 127 backcross animals that were
typed for all loci are shown at the top. For individual pairs of loci,
>127 animals were typed. Each column represents the chromosome
identified in the backcross progeny that was inherited from the
(C57BL/6J × M. spretus) F1 parent. Shaded boxes represent
the presence of a C57BL/6J allele, and white boxes represent the
presence of a M. spretus allele. The number of offspring
inheriting each type of chromosome is listed at the bottom of each
column. A partial chromosome 15 linkage map showing the location of
Osmr in relation to linked genes is shown at the bottom.
Recombination distances between loci (in centimorgans) are shown to the
left of the chromosome, and the positions of loci in human chromosomes,
where known, are shown to the right. References for the human map
positions of loci cited in this study can be obtained from GDB (Genome
Data Base), a computerized database of human linkage information
maintained by The William H. Welch Medical Library of The Johns Hopkins
University (Baltimore, MD).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The hOSM gene was isolated almost a decade ago.51 However,
the molecular characteristics and unique biologic properties of OSM
were not extensively studied because OSM had long been considered as
just another LIF, a cytokine with close structural and biologic
similarity. In addition, since mOSM remained molecularly unidentified
until recently, characterization of the receptor was not possible.
Cloning of the mOSM cDNA allowed us to examine its biologic functions
and led us to discover various unique activities.25 These
include stimulation of definitive hematopoiesis in the
embryo,26 maturation of hepatocytes (Kamiya et al,
submitted), and proliferation of neonatal Sertoli
cells.28 None of these activities were exhibited by LIF and
hOSM. In addition, we found various functions that are mediated by mOSM
but not by LIF and hOSM and vice versa, as described. As cytokine
functions are generally conserved between mouse and human, the
functional differences between mOSM and hOSM are unusual. Based on the
functions of mOSM and hOSM, as well as binding studies, we previously
proposed that unlike hOSM, mOSM does not use the mouse LIF receptor and
manifests its function only through the mOSM-specific
receptor.29 However, the molecular nature of the
mOSM-specific receptor remained unknown.
In this report, we describe molecular cloning of the mOSMR cDNA and
demonstrate that the coexpression of mOSMR and gp130 results in the
formation of a high-affinity mOSM receptor. Among IL-6 family members,
OSM is unique in its ability to bind gp130 with low
affinity.19,22 Interestingly, mOSM not only binds to gp130,
it also binds to mOSMR with low affinity. In contrast, hOSM binds
gp130 with low affinity but does not exhibit detectable binding to
hOSMR .21 Since the activation of cytokine receptors is
generally initiated by receptor dimerization,52 this direct binding of mOSM to both components will contribute to the formation of
a stable heterodimer (Fig 6). The
cytoplasmic domains of mouse and human OSMR contain Box1, Box2, and
the YXXQ motifs important for signal transduction. As described
previously,53 experiments using the G-CSFR-OSMR chimeric
receptor revealed that homodimerization of the cytoplasmic domain of
hOSMR was capable of activating STATs. The inability of the Ba/F3
transfectant expressing mOSMR alone to proliferate in response to
mOSM suggested that mOSM does not form a homodimer of mOSMR , despite
its ability to bind directly to mOSMR . On the other hand, IL-6 in
combination with the soluble IL-6 receptor is able to induce
homodimerization of gp130 and transduce signals through gp130 alone,
indicating that gp130 itself is sufficient for generating
signals.46 Alternatively, by analogy to the ability of CNTF
to activate the LIFR/gp130 complex in association with its specific
receptor subunit (CNTFR ),4 OSMR /gp130 might also be
used by an unidentified cytokine in combination with its specific
receptor subunit.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 6.
Proposed model of the functional mOSM receptor. Bold
arrows, high-affinity binding; arrows, low-affinity binding.
|
|
Studies on hOSMR-mediated signal transduction have revealed that hOSM
activates both STAT3 and STAT5b through the type II receptor in the
A375 cell line, whereas it phosphorylates STAT3 but not STAT5b through
the type I receptor in the JAR cell line.54 On the other
hand, the same set of STATs, ie, STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5b, are
phosphorylated in Hep3B cells through both type I and type II
OSMR.53 Thus, STATs and possibly other signaling molecules
activated by hOSM are likely to depend on the cell type rather than the
type of receptor. The distinct biologic actions of the gp130 family of
cytokines are most simply explained by the specific expression of their
receptors. For example, OSM transmits a growth promoting signal in LO
cells and a growth suppressing signal in NIH3T3 cells through the type
II receptor. NIH3T3 cells do not express the IL-6 receptor chain
and thus do not normally respond to IL-6. However, the combination of
IL-6 and soluble IL-6 receptor is able to promote proliferation of LO
cells and inhibit growth of NIH3T3 cells. OSM and LIF could therefore
exhibit the same biologic activities if both LIFR and OSMR are
expressed in the same cells. However, LIFR and OSMR are not
always coexpressed in mouse cells, and this is probably the major
reason that OSM and LIF exhibit their specific functions in mice.
Northern blot experiments revealed that mOSMR was widely distributed
in adult mice. The expression level was highest in the lung, heart,
thymus, and spleen. OSM is involved in inflammation. Consistently, in
human lung-derived epithelial cells, hOSM, but not IL-6 or LIF,
stimulates the synthesis of 1-proteinase inhibitor, which plays an
important role in inflammation, and the type II receptor signaling
pathway is critical for its synthesis.55 However, novel
OSM-specific biologic activities have recently been noted in the AGM
region, fetal liver, and neonatal testes as already described. In all
of these cases, an OSM response is observed only in restricted cell
populations and in a stage-specific manner during development. It would
therefore be interesting to uncover the expression profiles of mOSMR
and LIFR during development. Comparison of the transcriptional
regulation of OSMR and LIFR expression would also be important
for understanding the mechanism of mammalian embryogenesis and organogenesis.
We determined the chromosomal localization of the mOSMR gene. We
have compared our interspecific map of chromosome 15 with a composite
mouse linkage map that reports the map location of many uncloned mouse
mutations (provided by the Mouse Genome Database, a computerized
database maintained at The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME).
Osmr mapped in a region of the composite map that lacks mouse
mutations with a phenotype that might be expected for an alteration in
this locus (data not shown). The proximal region of mouse chromosome 15 shares regions of homology with human chromosome 5p and 8p (Fig 5). In
particular, Prlr and Lifr have been mapped to 5p14-p13
and 5p13-p12, respectively. The close linkage between Osmr and
Prlr and Lifr in the mouse suggests that the human
homolog of Osmr will map to 5p as well. Despite the difference
for the receptor usage by OSM between human and mouse, mOSMR and
hOSMR exhibit significant sequence conservation and both are
structurally related to LIFR . Colocalization of the mOSMR and
mLIFR genes strongly suggests that they were created by duplication
during evolution.
During the preparation of this report, Lindberg et al56
reported the cloning of mOSMR cDNA. Their nucleotide and amino acid
sequences are identical to those for our cDNA, except the following
positions. Nucleotides at the positions 1576 to 1578, which encodes a
lysine residue, are deleted in our cDNA. In addition, a threonin
residue at 505 is substituted with an alanine residue by a single
nucleotide change. These differences might be due to the difference in
mouse strains.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
We thank Deborah B. Householder for excellent technical assistance. The
nucleotide sequence data for this cDNA will appear in the DNA DATABANK
of JAPAN/European Molecular Biology Laboratory/Genbank nucleotide sequence databases with accession no. AB015978.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Submitted July 30, 1998; accepted September 25, 1998.
Supported in part by a Research Fellowship from the Japan Society for
the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists (M.T.), Grants-in-Aid for
Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports,
and Culture of Japan, and grants from the Core Research for Evolutional
Science and Technology, the Toray Research Foundation, the Uehara
Memorial Foundation, Japan Science and Technology Corporation,
and the National Institute, Department of Health and Human
Services, under contract with ABL.
The publication costs of this
article were defrayed in part by
page charge payment. This article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address reprint requests to Atsushi Miyajima, PhD,
Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, University of Tokyo,
1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan; e-mail:
miyajima{at}ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Rose TM, Bruce AG:
Oncostatin M is a member of a cytokine family that includes leukemia inhibitory factor, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and interleukin 6.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
88:8641, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2.
Bazan JF:
Neuropoietic cytokines in the hematopoietic fold.
Neuron
7:197, 1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Du XX, Williams DA:
Interleukin-11: A multifunctional growth factor derived from the hematopoietic microenvironment.
Blood
83:2023, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4.
Davis S, Aldrich TH, Stahl N, Pan L, Taga T, Kishimoto T, Ip NY, Yancopoulos GD:
LIFR beta and gp130 as heterodimerizing signal transducers of the tripartite CNTF receptor.
Science
260:1805, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5.
Pennica D, Arce V, Swanson TA, Vejsada R, Pollock RA, Armanini M, Dudley K, Philips HS, Rosenthal A, Kato AC, Henderson CE:
Cardiotrophin-1, a cytokine present in embryonic muscle, supports long term survival of spinal motoneurons.
Neuron
17:63, 1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Kishimoto T, Akira S, Narazaki M, Taga T:
Interleukin-6 family of cytokines and gp130.
Blood
86:1243, 1995[Free Full Text]
7.
Gearing DP:
The leukemia inhibitory factor and its receptor.
Adv Immunol
53:31, 1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Gearing DP, Druck T, Huebner K, Overhauser J, Gilbert DJ, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA:
The leukemia inhibitory factor receptor (LIFR) gene is located within a cluster of cytokine receptor loci on mouse chromosome 15 and human chromosome 5p12-p13.
Genomics
18:148, 1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Jeffery E, Price V, Gearing DP:
Close proximity of the genes for leukemia inhibitory factor and oncostatin M.
Cytokine
5:107, 1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Gascan H, Moreau JF, Jacques Y, Soulillou JP:
Response of murine IL3-sensitive cell lines to cytokines of human and murine origin.
Lymphokine Res
8:79, 1989[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Bruce AG, Hoggatt IH, Rose TM:
Oncostatin M is a differentiation factor for myeloid leukemia cells.
J Immunol
149:1271, 1992[Abstract]
12.
Rose TM, Weiford DM, Gunderson NL, Bruce AG:
Oncostatin M (OSM) inhibits the differentiation of pluripotent embryonic stem cells in vitro.
Cytokine
6:48, 1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Richards CD, Brown TJ, Shoyab M, Baumann H, Gauldie J:
Recombinant oncostatin M stimulates the production of acute phase proteins in HepG2 cells and rat primary hepatocytes in vitro.
J Immunol
148:1731, 1992[Abstract]
14.
Baumann H, Ziegler SF, Mosley B, Morella KK, Pajovic S, Gearing DP:
Reconstitution of the response to leukemia inhibitory factor, oncostatin M, and ciliary neurotrophic factor in hepatoma cells.
J Biol Chem
268:8414, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15.
Zarling JM, Shoyab M, Marquardt H, Hanson MB, Lioubin MN, Todaro GJ:
Oncostatin M: A growth regulator produced by differentiated histiocytic lymphoma cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
83:9739, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16.
McDonald VL, Dick KO, Malik N, Shoyab M:
Selection and characterization of a variant of human melanoma cell line, A375, resistant to growth inhibitory effects of oncostatin M (OM): Coresistant to interleukin 6 (IL-6).
Growth Factors
9:167, 1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Miles SA, Martinez-Maza O, Rezai A, Magpantay L, Kishimoto T, Nakamura S, Radka SF, Linsley PS:
Oncostatin M as a potent mitogen for AIDS-Kaposi's sarcoma-derived cells.
Science
255:1432, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18.
Richards CD, Shoyab M, Brown TJ, Gauldie J:
Selective regulation of metalloproteinase inhibitor (TIMP-1) by oncostatin M in fibroblasts in culture.
J Immunol
150:5596, 1993[Abstract]
19.
Gearing DP, Comeau MR, Friend DJ, Gimpel SD, Thut CJ, McGourty J, Brasher KK, King JA, Gills S, Mosley B, Ziegler SF, Cosman D:
The IL-6 signal transducer, gp130: An oncostatin M receptor and affinity converter for the LIF receptor.
Science
255:1434, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20.
Thoma B, Splett R, Boiani N, Chin W, Schooley K, Dower SK, Mosley B:
Two types of oncostatin M receptors trigger specific and overlapping signaling events.
Cytokine
7:607, 1995
21.
Mosley B, Imus CD, Friend D, Boiani N, Thoma B, Park LS, Cosman D:
Dual oncostatin M (OSM) receptors. Cloning and characterization of an alternative signaling subunit conferring OSM-specific receptor activation.
J Biol Chem
271:32635, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22.
Liu J, Modrell B, Aruffo A, Marken JS, Taga T, Yasukawa K, Murakami M, Kishimoto T, Shoyab M:
Interleukin-6 signal transducer gp130 mediates oncostatin M signaling.
J Biol Chem
267:16763, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23.
Sporeno E, Paonessa G, Salvati AL, Graziani R, Delmastro P, Ciliberto G, Toniatti C:
Oncostatin M binds directly to gp130 and behaves as interleukin-6 antagonist on a cell line expressing gp130 but lacking functional oncostatin M receptors.
J Biol Chem
269:10991, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24.
Thoma B, Bird TA, Friend DJ, Gearing DP, Dower SK:
Oncostatin M and leukemia inhibitory factor trigger overlapping and different signals through partially shared receptor complexes.
J Biol Chem
269:6215, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25.
Yoshimura A, Ichihara M, Kinjyo I, Moriyama M, Copeland NG, Gilbert DJ, Jenkins NA, Hara T, Miyajima A:
Mouse oncostatin M: An immediate early gene induced by multiple cytokines through the JAK-STAT5 pathway.
EMBO J
15:1055, 1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Mukouyama Y, Hara T, Xu M, Tamura K, Donovan PJ, Kim H, Kogo H, Tsuji K, Nakahata T, Miyajima A:
In vitro expansion of murine multipotential hematopoietic progenitors from the embryonic aorta-gonad-mesonephros region.
Immunity
8:105, 1998[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Medvinsky A, Dzierzak E:
Definitive hematopoiesis is autonomously initiated by the AGM region.
Cell
86:897, 1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Hara T, Tamura K, de Miguel MP, Mukouyama Y, Kim H, Kogo H, Donovan PJ, Miyajima A:
Distinct roles of oncostatin M and leukemia inhibitory factor in the development of primordial germ cells and Sertoli cells in mice.
Dev Biol
201:144, 1998[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Ichihara M, Hara T, Kim H, Murate T, Miyajima A:
Oncostatin M and leukemia inhibitory factor do not use the same functional receptor in mice.
Blood
90:165, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30.
Miyajima A, Schreurs J, Otsu K, Kondo A, Arai K, Maeda S:
Use of the silkworm, Bombyx mori, and an insect baculovirus vector for high-level expression and secretion of biologically active mouse interleukin-3.
Gene
58:273, 1987[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Hara T, Miyajima A:
Two distinct functional high affinity receptors for mouse IL-3.
EMBO J
10:1875, 1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Maruyama K, Tanabe Y:
New trend of cDNA cloning.
Med Immunol (Tokyo)
20:27, 1990
33.
Schreurs J, Sugawara M, Arai K, Ohta Y, Miyajima A:
A monoclonal antibody with IL-3-like activity blocks IL-3 binding and stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation.
J Immunol
142:819, 1989[Abstract]
34.
Schreurs J, Arai K, Miyajima A:
Evidence for a low-affinity interleukin-3 receptor.
Growth Factors
2:221, 1990[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Munson PJ:
LIGAND: A computerized analysis of ligand binding data.
Methods Enzymol
92:543, 1983 |