Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reiter, A.
Right arrow Articles by Riehm, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reiter, A.
Right arrow Articles by Riehm, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Trials and Observations
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, Vol. 94 No. 10 (November 15), 1999: pp. 3294-3306

Improved Treatment Results in Childhood B-Cell Neoplasms With Tailored Intensification of Therapy: A Report of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster Group Trial NHL-BFM 90

By Alfred Reiter, Martin Schrappe, Markus Tiemann, Wolf-Dieter Ludwig, Elif Yakisan, Martin Zimmermann, Georg Mann, Andreas Chott, Wolfram Ebell, Thomas Klingebiel, Norbert Graf, Bernhard Kremens, Stefan Müller-Weihrich, Hans-Jürgen Plüss, Felix Zintl, Günter Henze, and Hansjörg Riehm

From the Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover, Germany; the Lymphnode Registry of The Society of German Pathologists, Institute of Hematopathology, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, Germany; the Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité, Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany; the St. Anna Kinderspital, Vienna, Austria; the Department of Pathology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; the Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany; the Department of Pediatrics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; the Department of Pediatrics, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany; the Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University of Essen, Essen, Germany; the Department of Pediatrics, Technical University, München, Germany; the Department of Pediatrics, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland; and the Department of Pediatrics, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
PATIENTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

In study NHL-BFM 90, we investigated whether the serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) concentration and early response are useful markers for stratification of therapy for childhood B-cell neoplasms in addition to stage, if the outcome of patients with abdominal stage III and LDH >= 500 U/L can be improved by high-dose (HD) methotrexate (MTX) at 5 g/m2 instead of intermediate-dose (ID) MTX at 500 mg/m2 in the preceding study 86; whether 2 therapy courses are enough for patients with complete resection; and whether combined systemic and intraventricular chemotherapy is efficacious for central nervous system-positive (CNS+) patients. After a cytoreductive prephase, treatment was stratified into 3 risk groups: patients in R1 (completely resected) received 2 5-day courses (ID-MTX, dexamethasone, oxazaphorins, etoposide, cytarabine, doxorubicin, and intrathecal therapy), patients in R2 (extra-abdominal primary only or abdominal tumor and LDH <500 U/L) received 4 courses containing HD-MTX, and patients in R3 (abdominal primary and LDH >= 500 U/L or bone marrow/CNS/multilocal bone disease) received 6 courses. Incomplete responders after 2 courses received an intensification containing HD-cytarabine/etoposide. Patients with no or necrotic tumor thereafter received 3 more courses; 6 patients with viable tumor received autologous bone marrow transplantation. From April 1990 through March 1995, 413 evaluable patients were enrolled (R1, 17%; R2, 40%; and R3, 43%). The 6-year event-free survival (pEFS) was 89% ± 2% for all and 100%, 96% ±2%, and 78% ± 3% in R1, R2, and R3, respectively. The pEFS of patients with abdominal stage III and LDH >= 500 U/L was 81% ± 4% as compared with 43% ± 10% in study 86. Of 26 CNS+ patients, 5 died early, but only 3 relapsed.
© 1999 by The American Society of Hematology.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
PATIENTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

THE INTRODUCTION OF short, intensive therapy courses primarily based on cyclophosphamide, methotrexate (MTX), and intrathecal (i.th.) therapy resulted in improved survival rates of children suffering from mature B-cell neoplasms.1-8 Conclusions from 3 previous trials of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) group were that 3 courses of chemotherapy are enough for patients with completely resected localized tumors and that 6 courses are as good as 8 for patients with advanced stage disease.3 High-dose (HD) MTX therapy (5 g/m2) instead of intermediate-dose (ID) MTX (0.5 g/m2) improved the outcome of patients with acute B-cell leukemia (B-ALL).5 Central nervous system-negative (CNS-) patients do not need CNS irradiation for prevention of CNS relapses.5,6 An intraventricularly applied chemotherapy is likely to be beneficial for patients with CNS disease.5 Patients with incomplete tumor regression after 2 or 3 therapy courses had an increased risk of failure, particularly if they had histologically active residual tumors. There was no evidence of a curative role of surgery or radiotherapy.5,6,9

However, these intensive treatment strategies carry acute and late risks. But, after failure of first-line therapy, the probability of survival is poor.10 Therefore, further improvement of therapy requires optimized tailoring of treatment intensity to the patient's risk of failure. In our previous trials, treatment intensity was stratified according to the St. Jude staging system.11 Descriptions of tumor burden as an important prognostic factor12-14 are in line with the hypothesis of Goldie and Coldman15 that the proportion of multiple resistant cells correlates with tumor mass. Yet, the parameters of tumor mass, eg, serum level of lactic dehydrogenase (LDH),12 were not used for stratification of therapy because they correlate with stage.16 However, stage III of the St. Jude's staging system includes patients with largely varying tumor mass. In our previous trial, NHL-BFM 86, patients with stage III and pretherapeutic serum LDH concentrations >= 500 U/L had a significantly worse outcome than those with lower LDH values (6-year event-free survival [pEFS], 43% ± 10% [n = 23] v 85% ± 6% [n = 35]). Therefore, in study NHL-BFM 90, LDH was used as an additional parameter for stratification of therapy intensity.

In study NHL-BFM 90, the goals for the treatment group B-NHL/B-ALL were to investigate whether a system for stratification of treatment intensity based on resectability, LDH, and stage is appropriate; whether the outcome of patients with abdominal stage III and LDH >= 500 U/L can be improved by intensified chemotherapy; whether survival of patients with incomplete initial response can be improved by stepwise intensification of therapy, including autologous blood stem cell transplantation; whether for patients with completely resected localized tumors therapy can further be reduced from 3 to 2 5-day courses; whether for patients with low tumor mass (LDH <500 U/L) therapy can be reduced from 6 to 4 courses when HD-MTX is used instead of ID-MTX; and whether combined intravenously and intraventricularly applied chemotherapy without radiotherapy is efficacious treatment for patients with CNS disease.

We report here on the treatment strategy and results of children and adolescents suffering from mature B-cell neoplasms enrolled in the study NHL BFM-90 from Austria, Germany, and part of Switzerland during a period of 5 years. Results are compared with those of trial NHL-BFM 86 as a historical control.


    PATIENTS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
PATIENTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Patients.   Children and adolescents up to 18 years of age newly diagnosed with any kind of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or B-ALL were eligible for trial NHL-BFM 90. Exclusion criteria were the following: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related NHL, severe immunodeficiency, posttransplantation lymphoma, and pre-existing disease prohibiting chemotherapy. From April 1990 through March 1995, 682 eligible patients were enrolled from 90 clinics in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland after informed consent of their guardians had been obtained. The study population was subdivided according to NHL subtype into 3 groups with different therapy strategies: therapy group non-B (n = 162, patients with lymphoblastic lymphoma [precursor-B-cell or T-cell] or peripheral T-cell lymphoma), therapy group B-NHL/B-ALL (n = 431, patients with mature B-cell-NHL [B-NHL] or B-ALL), and therapy group ALCL (n = 89, patients with anaplastic large-cell lymphoma [ALCL]). We report here on the treatment and results of therapy group B-NHL/B-ALL. Of the 431 patients of group B-NHL/B-ALL, 18 patients (4%) were excluded from the evaluation for the following reasons: no therapy applied due to an individual decision (1 patient, alive after complete resection), premature withdrawal (1 patient, alive), treatment according to therapy strategy non-B (2 patients, 2 relapses), treatment according to therapy strategy ALCL (1 patient, free of disease), treatment according to protocol of previous trial NHL-BFM 86 (1 patient, free of disease), treatment according to a pilot protocol (6 patients, 1 relapse), allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT; 1 patient, free of disease), and no intraventricular chemotherapy despite CNS disease (5 patients [1 received cranial irradiation], 2 CNS relapses). Finally, 413 patients with B-cell neoplasms were evaluable for response.

Diagnosis.   Cases were classified according to the updated Kiel-Classification for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas.17 The corresponding terms of the Revised European American Lymphoma (REAL) Classification18 are given in Table 3. Immunophenotyping of fresh cell suspensions was performed as previously described.19 In 341 patients, the diagnosis of B-NHL was based on histopathology and immunohistochemistry. From 233 (68%) of these 341 patients, the histopathological material was reviewed centrally by a reference laboratory of the study. Sixteen cases were classified as Burkitt's lymphoma due to L3 morphology according to French-American-British (FAB) criteria20 of cells from malignant effusions. The presence of surface Igs (sIg) was proven in 11 of these 16 patients. Immunophenotyping was incomplete in 2 cases due to inappropriate material, whereas from 3 patients no material was available for central immunopheotyping. Fifty-six patients were diagnosed with B-ALL due to the presence of 25% or more FAB L3 blasts in the bone marrow (BM). The expression of sIg was shown by immunophenotyping in 41 of these 56 patients. Immunophenotyping was incomplete in 9 cases due to inappropriate material, whereas from 5 patients no material was available for central immunopheotyping. In 1 case, the FAB-L3 blasts did not express sIg.

Staging.   The St. Jude staging system11 was used. Staging studies included physical examination, peripheral blood and BM aspiration smears, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analyses, ultrasonography, x-ray, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and skeletal scintigraphy. In patients with an otherwise proven diagnosis of NHL, bone involvement was diagnosed if imaging studies showed bone lesions. Initial CNS disease was diagnosed if at least 1 of the following was present: morphologically identifiable lymphoma cells in the CSF on cytospin-preparations (regardless of the number), cerebral infiltrates on cranial CT or MRI, or cranial nerve palsy that was not caused by an extradural or extracranial mass. Testicular involvement was diagnosed clinically as the presence of painless enlargement of 1 or both testicles, provided that the diagnosis of NHL was otherwise established. The total serum LDH activity was measured as a routine laboratory test using standard methods.21 The normal limits of serum LDH values varied between the participating clinics. The comparability of measured enzyme activities measured in different laboratories is monitored by an external quality control system.

Stratification of treatment intensity.   Therapy was stratified into 3 risk groups (Fig 1) according to the following definitions. Risk group 1 was defined as patients with initial complete resection of the lymphoma manifestation. Risk group 2 was defined as patients with no or incomplete resection of lymphoma manifestations, for which 1 of the following criteria is met: only extra-abdominal sites or abdominal site and LDH less than 500 U/L, measured before beginning chemotherapy. Risk group 3 was defined as patients with no or incomplete resection of abdominal lymphoma and LDH >= 500 U/L, all patients with BM involvement or/and CNS disease, or/and multifocal bone involvement.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Treatment strategy. Patients were stratified into 3 risk groups: R1, R2, and R3. The composition of therapy courses is given in Table 1. V, cytoreductive prophase; CR, complete response; SL-OP, second-look operation; ABMT, autologous BMT or blood stem cell transplantation.

Chemotherapy.   The therapy courses are given in Table 1. All patients received a 5-day cytoreductive prephase. Hydration of 3,000 to 4,500 mL/m2/d, alkalization with NaHCO3 intravenously (IV), and allopurinol were administered to prevent acute cell lysis syndrome. By July 1, 1993, an amendment of the cytoreductive prephase was introduced because of the incidence of early toxic death. Cyclophosphamide doses were reduced to 2, and prednisone was replaced by dexamethasone at 5 mg/m2/d on days 1 and 2 and at 10 mg/m2/d on days 3, 4, and 5. After the 5-day prephase, the first course of chemotherapy should be initiated the next day depending on the condition of the patient. The median delay of the initiation of the first course of chemotherapy was 0 days (range, 0 to 52 days). Patients in risk group R1 received 2 therapy courses A, B. Patients in risk group R2 received 4 courses AA-BB-AA-BB. Patients in risk group R3 received 6 courses AA-BB-AA-BB-AA-BB. Conditions for starting the second and third course of therapy were as follows: platelets greater than 50,000/µL and neutrophils greater than 200/µL after the nadir of postchemotherapeutic cytopenia was passed; for subsequent courses 4, 5, and 6, neutrophils should be greater than 500/µL. The minimal interval between the first day of 2 successive courses should be at least 2 weeks.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Therapy Courses

In the therapy courses AA and BB, which contain MTX at 5 g/m2, the MTX serum concentration were measured at 24, 36, 42, and 48 hours from the start of the MTX IV infusion. The serum levels of MTX should be <= 150 µmol/L at 24 hours from start of MTX infusion, less than 3 µmol/L at 36 hours, <= 1 µmol/L at 42 hours, and <= 0.4 µmol/L at 48 hours. Leucovorin rescue (racemic folinic acid) was administered IV at 30 mg/m2 at 42 hours and at 15 mg/m2 at 48 and 54 hours after the start of MTX infusion. If the MTX serum concentrations was higher than expected at 42 or 48 hours, measurements of the MTX serum levels and administration of leucovorin rescue were continued every 6 hours until the serum MTX concentration decreased to less than 0.25 µmol/L. The dose of leucovorin was adjusted as follows: MTX serum level of greater than 1 to 2 µmol/L, leucovorin at 30 mg/m2; MTX level of greater than 2 to 3 µmol/L, leucovorin at 45 mg/m2; MTX level of greater than 3 to 4 µmol/L, leucovorin at 60 mg/m2; and MTX level of greater than 4 to 5 µmol/L, leucovorin at 75 mg/m2. If the MTX level exceeded 5 µmol/L, the leucovorin dose was calculated according to the formula leucovorin (in milligrams) = MTX serum concentrations (in micromoles per liter) × body weight (in kilograms) and was administered as an IV infusion to avoid hypercalcemia.

In patients with overt CNS disease, a device for intraventricular application of chemotherapy was implanted before the second course of therapy. MTX at 3 mg and 2.5 mg prednisolone were administered on days 1, 2, 3, and 4 and 30 mg cytarabine was administered on day 5 of courses AA and BB. In courses CC, 3 mg MTX and 2.5 mg prednisolone were administered on days 3, 4, 5, and 6; 30 mg cytarabine was administered on day 7 (dose reduction for patients <3 years).

Patients in risk groups R2 and R3 who had a residual tumor and/or persistent blasts in the BM and/or in the CSF after 2 therapy courses received therapy course CC (Table 1). Patients were re-evaluated after course CC. In case of a persistent mass, a second-look operation was performed. If no viable lymphoma tissue was found, therapy was continued with 3 more courses AA-BB-CC. If viable lymphoma tissue was found, then megadose chemotherapy with autologous BM or blood stem cell rescue was performed. The high-dose chemotherapy consisted of busulfan, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide (Table 2). In CNS+ patients, thiotepa was administered instead of cyclophosphamide.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Local therapy modalities.   In case of localized disease, complete surgical resection was recommended if it could be easily and safely accomplished without the risk of functional impairments. In advanced stage disease, restricting initial surgery to the minimum required for gaining appropriate diagnostic tissue was recommended. Second-look surgery should follow the same guidelines. Local radiotherapy was not performed. In male subjects with testicular involvement, orchiectomy and radiotherapy was not foreseen.

Response criteria.   The treatment success was determined by the rate of EFS of the patients. Events were death due to any cause, tumor progression, and second malignancy. Tumor response was evaluated after each course of therapy. Follow-up studies were performed at 4- to 6-week intervals during the first 1.5 years. In patients with BM or/and CNS involvement, control punctures of BM or/and CSF were performed only until the BM or the CNS, respectively, was cleared from blasts. Progression was defined as a recurrence of lymphoma proven by biopsy or regrowth of an incompletely resolved tumor. The diagnosis of isolated progression in the BM was based on 25% or more blasts in the BM. The diagnosis of isolated progression in the CNS was based on the appearance of blasts in the CSF.

Statistical analysis.   Analyses of EFS were performed using the Kaplan and Meier method22 with differences compared by the log-rank test.23 EFS was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the first event (death from any cause, tumor progress, or second malignancy) or to the date of last follow-up. Patients lost to follow-up (LFU) were censored at the time of their withdrawal. Rank order comparisons of the prognostic relevance of different parameters were examined by stepwise Cox regression analysis.24 Differences in the distribution of individual parameters among patients subsets were analyzed using the chi 2 test or Fisher's Exact Test. The statistical analysis was performed using the SAS statistical program (SAS-PC, Version 6.12; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Follow-up data were actualized as of October 1, 1998.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
PATIENTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Patient characteristics.   Of the 413 evaluable patients, 92 were girls and 321 were boys. The median age was 9.0 years (range, 1.2 to 17.9 years). The diagnoses of the patients are given in Table 3. The distribution of stages were stage I, II, III, IV, B-ALL in 12%, 28%, 41%, 6%, and 13% of patients, respectively. The median pretreatment LDH level was 365 U/L (range, 80 to 17,000 U/L). Figure 2 shows the distribution of serum LDH values according to stage. Table 4 lists the distribution of patients according to risk groups and stages: 17% of patients were assigned to risk group R1, 40% to risk group R2, and 43% to risk group R3. Patients with stages I and II were subdivided between risk groups R1 and R2 according to complete versus incomplete tumor resection. Patients with stage III were subdivided 1:73:95 between risk groups R1:R2:R3 according to LDH and localization of the primary tumor. Six stage III patients with pretreatment LDH >= 500 U/L were assigned to risk group R2 due to exclusively extra-abdominal disease. Of the 24 patients with stage IV disease, 12 had BM involvement, 9 had CNS disease, and 3 had both BM and CNS disease. Fourteen of the 56 B-ALL patients had CNS involvement at diagnosis. Of the 26 patients with CNS disease, 18 had CSF blasts (1 had also an intraparenchymal mass). The median number of CSF cells of these patients was 9/µL (range, 1 to 1,000/µL). Three patients were considered CNS+ due to an intraparenchymal mass and cranial nerve palsy, and 5 patients had a cranial nerve palsy only. Four of the 26 CNS+ patients had an epidural mass. Another 5 patients had epidural tumors without CSF blasts or intraparenchymal lesions, and they were considered CNS-. Three boys had unilateral wheras 1 had bilateral testicular disease. The diagnosis of testicular involvement was established by biopsy in 2 cases and clinically plus by ultrasound in 2 cases. Twenty patients with impaired renal functions due to kidney infiltration or/and acute cell lysis syndrome needed hemodialysis.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Diagnosis and Site of Progression



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Distribution of pretreatment serum LDH concentrations (logarithmic scale) according to stage of disease. (open circle ) Patients surviving event-free; () toxic death; (black-triangle) patients suffering from progress; (*) patients who developed second malignancy. From 16 patyients (2, 7, 2, 1, and 4 of stage I, II, III, IV, and B-ALL, respectively) the LDH values are lacking. One of these patients (stage IV) relapsed, and 2 B-ALL patients died of acute cell lysis syndrome. One patient (stage III) with LDH less than 100 U/L and 3 patients (B-ALL) with LDH greater than 10,000 are not depicted; 1 of them (B-ALL) died of acute cell lysis syndrome.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Risk Groups and Stages

EFS.   At a median follow-up of 4.2 years (range, 1.0 to 7.1 years), the estimate for pEFS is 88% ± 2% for the 431 eligible patients and 89% ± 2% for the 413 patients evaluable for response (Fig 3A). Twenty-one patients were lost to follow-up after a median event-free follow-up duration of 1.73 years (range, 0.2 to 5.46 years).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Kaplan-Meier estimate of EFS (A) for the whole group of evaluable patients and (B) according to risk groups R1, R2, and R3. SE, standard error.

The following analysis of treatment results includes only the 413 evaluable patients. The pEFS at 6 years was 100%, 96% ± 2%, and 78% ± 3% for patients in risk groups R1, R2, and R3, respectively (Fig 3B). Eight patients in risk group R1 were treated according to branch R2, and 12 patients of risk group R2 were treated according to branch R3 due to individual decisions of the physicians in charge. The pEFS at 6 years according to the treatment applied was 100%, 96% ± 2%, and 79% ± 3% for patients treated according to branches R1, R2, and R3, respectively.

Events.   Forty-three patients suffered an adverse event (Table 5). Three children in risk group R3 died early of acute cell lysis syndrome. Eleven children (3 in risk group R2 and 8 in risk group R3) died of toxic death. Twenty-seven children suffered from progression (2 in risk group R2 and 25 in risk group R3). In 10 of these patients, progression occurred during therapy; in 15 patients, progression occurred within 3 months after completion of therapy. Local manifestations were the most frequent site of tumor failure (19 of 27 cases), followed by BM and new sites (Table 3). Two patients developed a secondary malignancy. The histology of both second malignancies was again NHL. A girl who was 6.6 years of age at the first diagnosis Burkitt`s lymphoma developed a second Burkitt`s lymphoma 3.5 years later. The light-chain restriction of the first tumor was kappa , whereas the light-chain was lambda  in the second tumor. The second case was an 8.5-year-old boy with a first diagnosis of B-ALL. Three years later, he developed a T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. Two boys (1 with B-NHL, not further classifiable, and 1 with Burkitt`s lymphoma) suffered from unusual late recurrences 3.5 and 4 years after completion of therapy. One of them was very recently diagnosed as suffering from X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome. In both cases, the clonal identity or difference of the first and the second tumor could not be investigated due to the lack of appropriate material.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Adverse Events by Risk Groups

EFS according to stage of disease and pretreatment LDH values.   pEFS according to stage is depicted in Fig 4. Table 6 summarizes adverse events according to stage. Of the 56 B-ALL patients, 17 had 25% to 69% L3-blasts in the BM, 1 of them died early, 3 died of toxicity, and 2 failed to respond to therapy. Thirty-nine B-ALL patients had greater than 70% L3 blasts in the BM, 2 of them died early, 1 died of toxicity, and 4 failed to respond to therapy. Figure 2 shows the incidence of events according to stage and pretreatment LDH values. pEFS of patients with stage III (pEFS, 88% + 3%; n = 169) was significantly higher than pEFS of patients with stage IV+B-ALL (pEFS, 74% ± 5%; n = 80; P = .0059). However, in patients with stage III and IV B-ALL, the LDH values varied over a wide range. pEFS was significantly lower for patients with stage III/IV/B-ALL, with LDH values greater than 1,000 U/L (pEFS, 70% ± 5%; n = 84) as compared with those with LDH values less than 1,000 U/L (pEFS, 90% ± 3%; n = 158; P = .0001). In a Cox regression analysis with the covariables stage (stage III v stage IV+B-ALL) and LDH (<1,000 v >= 1,000 U/L), LDH greater than 1,000 U/L was the superimposed predictor for treatment outcome (risk ratio, 6.450; P = .0017), whereas the prognostic impact of stage IV+B-ALL was not significant (risk ratio, 2.726; P = .3802).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Kaplan-Meier estimate of EFS according to stage. SE, standard error.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Adverse Events by Stages

CNS disease.   The pEFS at 6 years for the 26 patients with initial CNS disease (17 BM positive and 9 BM negative) was 65% ± 9%. Two patients died early of acute cell lysis syndrome, and 3 patients died of sepsis after the first course of therapy before an Ommaya-reservoir was implanted (Table 6). Of the remaining 21 patients, 3 suffered from progression, but only 1 of them within the CNS.

Testicular involvement.   In 2 of the 4 boys with testicular involvement, no local therapy was performed and both remained event-free. In 2 cases, orchiectomy was performed after 3 courses of therapy due to suspected residual disease. In both cases, histology did not show evidence for residual lymphoma. One of these 2 patients died later in the course of sepsis, and the second one remained event-free.

Outcome according to the kinetics of response to therapy.   The courses of patients in risk groups R2 and R3 are depicted in Fig 5A and B, respectively. One patient in risk group R2 and 9 patients in risk group R3 died of initial complications or of infection before the response could be evaluated, after the second course of therapy. One hundred sixty-six patients each were evaluable for response after the first 2 therapy courses in risk groups R2 and R3. Using imaging methods, 46 patients (28%) in risk group R2 and 73 patients (44%) in risk group R3 had tumor remnants after 2 courses of therapy (P = .002). No patient with initial BM or/and CNS involvement had persistent blasts in the BM or the CSF after 2 courses. Of the 46 patients in risk group R2 with tumor remnants, 2 suffered from subsequent progression as compared with 13 of 73 patients in risk group R3 with tumor remnants (P = .031). In risk group R3, 8 patients had viable residual tumor after course CC: 6 received autologous BMT (ABMT); 1 suffered from progression, 1 patient received local radiotherapy and suffered from progression, and 1 patient had viable residual tumor in an ovary that was completely resected. This patient received 3 more courses AA-BB-CC and remained free of progression.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Direction of treatment intensity and second-look surgery according to response. (A) Course of patients in risk group R2; (B) course of patients in risk group R3. ED, early death by acute cell lysis syndrome; TD, toxic death; NED, no evidence of disease; SL-OP, second-look operation; ABMT, autologous BMT; LRT, local radiotherapy; FOP, free of progress; LFU, lost to follow-up.

EFS according to histological subtypes.   pEFS at 6 years was 89% ± 2% for the 322 patients with Burkitt-type lymphomas or B-ALL, 95% ± 3% for the 56 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (including 8 patients with mediastinal [thymic] B-cell lymphoma), and 84% ± 7% for the 35 patients with B-NHL not further classified (P > .14 for all comparisons).

Toxicity.   Apart from myelosuppression, mucositis was the leading toxic side effect in this therapy and was related to the dose of MTX. Mucositis World Health Organization (WHO) grade >= 2 occurred after 12%, 19%, 47%, 48%, and 13% of courses A, B, AA, BB, and CC, respectively. Febrile episodes were observed after 7%, 12%, 7%, 37%, 31%, and 24% of courses A, B, AA, BB, and CC, respectively. Nine patients died of septicemia and enterocolitis (3 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 1 Citrobacter, and 4 blood culture negative). Of these, 6, 2, and 1 patients died after the first, second, and third course of chemotherapy, respectively. On July 1, 1993, the number of cyclophosphamide doses of the cytoreductive prephase was reduced from 5 to 2. Five of the 6 toxic deaths during the neutropenic phase after the first course of therapy occurred before this amendment, with only 1 occurring thereafter. One patient died of acute cardiac insufficiency after the fifth course of therapy. One patient died of acquired respiratory distress syndrome after autologous BMT.

Comparison of results: NHL-BFM 90 and NHL-BFM 86.   The pEFS at 6 years for B-NHL/-B-ALL patients was 89% ± 2% in study NHL-BFM 90 as compared with 82% ± 3% in study NHL-BFM 86 (P = .0087; Table 7). pEFS was not significantly different between both studies for patients with stage I, stage II, stage IV, and B-ALL, respectively. However, for patients with stage III disease, pEFS at 6 years was significantly higher in study NHL-BFM 90. The improvement in stage III patients was an increase of pEFS from 43% ± 10% in study NHL-BFM 86 to 81% ± 4% in study NHL-BFM 90 for those patients with abdominal disease and LDH >= 500 U/L (Fig 6).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Comparisons of pEFS of Patients Between Studies NHL-BFM 90 and NHL-BFM 86 



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 6. Kaplan-Meier estimate of EFS for patients with abdominal stage III B-NHL and LDH >= 500 U/L in trial NHL-BFM 90 and in the preceding trial NHL-BFM 86. SE, standard error.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
PATIENTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

In trial NHL-BFM 90, a total of 431 children and adolescents with mature B-cell neoplasms were enrolled, of whom 413 were evaluable for response. The 6-year pEFS was 88% ± 2% for all 431 eligible patients and was 89% ± 2% for the 413 evaluable patients. The therapy strategy applied proved to be a highly efficacious treatment not only for patients with Burkitt-type lymphomas and B-ALL, but also for patients suffering from diffuse large B-cell lymphomas.

The results of trial NHL-BFM 90 demonstrate that the outcome of B-NHL patients who were at high risk of progression could be significantly improved by intensification of therapy. The improvement of treatment results in study NHL-BFM 90 as compared with study NHL-BFM 866 was exclusively due to a significant increase of pEFS for patients with abdominal stage III and LDH >= 500 U/L, who were the target group for treatment intensification in study NHL-BFM 90. Compared with our preceding studies, these patients received HD-MTX therapy at 5 g/m2 instead of ID-MTX at 0.5 g/m2. Furthermore, 44% of them received high-dose cytarabine/etoposide therapy because of an incomplete tumor resolution after 2 courses of therapy, and 6.6% of them received ABMT due to a persistent viable tumor after 3 courses of therapy. pEFS for these patient subgroup increased from 43% ± 10% in study NHL-BFM 86 to 81% ± 4% in study NHL-BFM 90.

Our data confirm that, in addition to stage, LDH as a parameter of tumor burden is appropriate for stratification of treatment intensity for patients with B-cell neoplasms. Approximately 40% of patients present with stage III in the St. Jude system,11 which includes patients with varying tumor burden and, therefore, who may need different treatment intensities.25 In our previous studies, a cut-off of 500 U/L of the pretherapeutic LDH serum concentration distinguished 2 subgroups of stage III patients with significantly different outcomes when they received uniform treatment, including ID-MTX at 0.5 g/m2. The pEFS of patients with LDH less than 500 U/L was comparable to that of patients with stage II disease, whereas the pEFS of patients with abdominal stage III and LDH >= 500 U/L was less than 50%. Therefore, in study NHL-BFM 90, the pretherapeutic LDH was used for stratification of treatment intensity together with resectability and stage (BM and CNS involvement). As a consequence, patients with stage III were subdivided into risk groups R2 and R3. This stratification system enables the pretherapeutic identification of 60% of patients (risk groups R1 + R2) with a probability of EFS of >= 95% with limited therapy intensity. Almost all patients at risk for failure are assembled in risk group R3.

As in many malignancies, the speed of the initial response to therapy has prognostic impact for B-NHL-patients. In our previous studies, as in other studies, patients with incomplete tumor regression after 2 or 3 therapy courses had an increased risk of failure, especially those with viable residual tumors.1,5,6,9,26 Therefore, in study NHL-BFM 90, we examined a strategy of stepwise intensification of therapy for patients with incomplete response after 2 courses of therapy. The first step of intensification was HD-cytarabine/etoposide, which was described as being effective in relapsed patients.27 Patients who still had residual tumor thereafter underwent second-look surgery. Those patients with viable tumor received megadose chemotherapy with hematological stem cell rescue as a second step of intensification.28 Although the contribution of each step to patient outcome is difficult to judge, some conclusions are possible. In patients with incomplete early tumor regression, the risk of subsequent progression depends on the patient's initial tumor mass. In risk group R2, only 2 of 46 patients with residual tumor after 2 courses of therapy suffered from subsequent progression, compared with 13 of 73 such patients in risk group R3. Moreover, in risk group R3, the probability of progression-free survival of patients with a residual tumor after 2 courses was significantly higher for patients with pretreatment LDH values less than 1,000 U/L as compared with those with LDH values >= 1,000 U/L (data not shown).

Megadose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue may be beneficial for patients with histologically active tumor after 3 therapy courses. Of 6 patients who received ABMT, 1 suffered from progression, whereas 4 of 5 such patients in study NHL-BFM 86 who did not receive ABMT died of progressive disease.6 However, this ambitious approach including invasive monitoring of tumor regression was not sufficiently predictive of the course of the disease. We observed local recurrences among patients with complete resolution of tumors as determined by imaging and second-look surgery. Contrarily, the majority of patients with tumor remnants who did not receive second-look surgery remained subsequently free of progression. Even the finding of viable residual tumor on second-look operation may be not of unequivocal value, considering the total group of patients. To identify 8 patients with viable residual tumor, 45 second-look operations had to be performed. Our conclusion from this prospective trial is that the strategy of guiding treatment according to the clinical response to therapy is of limited value and carries substantial risks. The interpretation of imaging and histological material may also be biased by the investigators' knowledge that their judgement has consequences on patient treatment.

We agree with others that patients with localized stages I and II should have limited therapy.29 However, in view of the poor prognosis of relapsed patients, recurrences should be avoided completely.30 In trial NHL-BFM 90, it was shown that 2 5-day courses containing ID-MTX are enough therapy to avoid relapse in patients with completely resected localized B-NHL. The cumulative dose of doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) and that of oxazaphorins is below the threshold of late gonadotoxicity31 for these patients. However, it should be emphasized that resectability is determined by the extent of the disease. However, because the extent of the disease is the overriding predictor of outcome,9,32 disabling surgical procedures to achieve complete resection are not justified. For patients with no or incomplete resection but rather low tumor mass (stage I and II and stage III with LDH <500 U/L), who constitute risk group R2, treatment duration was reduced from 6 courses in the previous trials to 4 courses in study NHL-BFM 90. Hereby, the cumulative doses of cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin were reduced to 3 g/m2, 8 g/m2, and 100 mg/m2, respectively. As compensation, ID-MTX was replaced by HD-MTX. Only 2 of 167 patients in risk group R2 failed to respond to therapy. Thirty of the 167 patients (18%) in risk group R2 (2, 10, and 18 patients of stage I, II, and III, LDH <500 U/L, respectively) received HD-cytarabine/etoposide and a total of 6 therapy courses because of incomplete tumor regression after 2 courses. However, the fact that, in risk group R2, only 2 of 46 patients with residual tumor after 2 courses suffered from subsequent progression suggests that this strategy was most probably an overtreatment of these patients. Hence, further reduction of therapy for these patients has been integrated into our ongoing trial NHL-BFM 95.

Initial CNS disease remains a challenge in patients with B-cell neoplasms. Intriguing results were reported from the French study LMB 89 using HD-cytarabine, HD-MTX at 8 g/m2, and cranial irradiation.33 However, the benefit of CNS irradiation for CNS+ patients may be uncertain. Intraventricularly applied chemotherapy provides a better distribution within the CSF,34 and a higher concentration over time by fractionation of dose35 can be achieved. In trial NHL-BFM 90, we investigated whether fractionated, intraventricularly applied chemotherapy in combination with systemic HD-MTX therapy can provide efficacious CNS-protection for CNS+ patients without using radiotherapy. This strategy proved to be highly effective. Of the 26 CNS+ patients, 2 patients died of acute cell lysis syndrome and 3 patients died of sepsis after the first course of therapy before an Ommaya-reservoir was implanted. Of the remaining 21 patients, 3 suffered from progression, and only 1 of them within the CNS.

Whereas potential late risks of the therapy were reduced at least for part of the patients through reduction of the cumulative doses of critical drugs and omission of cranial radiotherapy, the acute toxicity of this treatment program is still a challenge. The contribution of hematopoetic growth factors to ameliorate morbidity and mortality is uncertain.8,36,37 Most deaths from infection occurred after the first course of therapy. The incidence of toxic death at this point was diminished after reduction of the intensity of the cytoreductive prephase. Metabolic complications of acute cell lysis and impaired renal function may also contribute to the risk of the early treatment phase. Urate oxidase is able to reduce these complications and may be most efficacious in reducing early deaths.38,39 Unfortunately, urate oxidase is not available in all countries and could not be used in our trial. Severe orointestinal mucositis is the most likely pathway for life-threatening or fatal infections. In our therapy, severe mucositis is clearly related to HD-MTX. MTX is a keystone component of all successful treatment programs for B-cell neoplasms of childhood.7,8,33,40-42 However, doses and schedules of the MTX therapies differ from 1 g/m2 to 8 g/m2 as IV infusions over 3 to 24 hours. Both antitumor efficacy and toxicity may correlate with dose and time of exposure to the drug. We consider it an important goal to find out the most efficacious and least toxic schedule of MTX therapy for these children. Therefore, in our ongoing trial, we are investigating in a randomized fashion whether a reduced infusion time of the same dose of MTX will result in less toxicity without jeopardizing treatment outcome.


    APPENDIX
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
PATIENTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Study Committee of Trial NHL-BFM 90.   W. Dörffel, Berlin; W. Ebell, Berlin; N. Graf, Homburg; H. Gadner, Vienna; G. Henze, Berlin; G. Janka-Schaub, Hamburg; T. Klingebiel, Tübingen; St. Müller-Weihrich, Munich; I. Mutz, Leoben; H.J. Plüss, Zürich; R. Parwaresch, Kiel; A. Reiter, Hannover; H. Riehm, Hannover; G. Schellong, Münster; M. Schrappe, Hannover; F. Zintl, Jena.

Principal Investigators.   R. Mertens (Aachen); R. Angst (Aarau); A. Gnekow (Augsburg); R. Dickerhoff (St. Augustin); P. Imbach (Basel); G.F. Wündisch (Bayreuth); W. Dörffel (Berlin-Buch); G. Henze (Berlin, Charité); E. Hilgenfeld (Berlin, Charité); U. Bode (Bonn); W. Eberl (Braunschweig); H.J. Spaar (Bremen); H. Jacobi (Celle); I. Krause (Chemnitz); J.-D. Thaben (Coburg); D. Möbius (Cottbus); W. Andler (Datteln); H. Breu (Dortmund); G. Weibeta bach (Dresden, University); W. Kotte (Dresden); U. Göbel (Düsseldorf); J.D. Beck (Erlangen); W. Havers (Essen); G. Müller (Feldkirch); B. Kornhuber (Frankfurt); C. Niemeyer (Freiburg); F. Lampert (Giebeta en); M. Lakomek (Göttingen); C. Urban (Graz); H. Reddemann (Greifswald); P. Exadaktylos (Halle); K. Winkler (Hamburg); H. Riehm (Hannover); K-M. Debatin (Heidelberg); N. Graf (Homburg); C. Tautz (Herdecke); F.M. Fink (Innsbruck); F. Zintl (Jena); I. Krüger (Kaiserslautern); G. Nessler (Karlsruhe); H. Wehinger (Kassel); R. Schneppenheim (Kiel); H. Mebeta ner (Klagenfurt); M. Rister (Koblenz); F. Berthold (Köln); W. Sternschulte (Köln); C. Schulte-Wissermann (Krefeld); M. Domula (Leipzig); I. Mutz (Leoben); G. Schmitt (Linz); O. Stöllinger (Linz); L. Nobile (Locarno); P. Bucsky (Lübeck); H. Rütschle (Ludwigshafen); U. Caflisch (Luzern); U. Mittler (Magdeburg); P. Gutjahr (Mainz); O. Sauer (Mannheim); C. Eschenbach (Marburg); W. Tillmann (Minden); S. Müller-Weihrich (München, Technical University); C. Bender-Götze (München); R.J. Haas (München); P. Klose (München-Harlaching); H. Jürgens (Münster); A. Feldmann (Neunkirchen); A. Jobke (Nürnberg); U. Schwarzer (Nürnberg); G. Eggers (Rostock); R. Geib-König (Saarbrücken); H. Grienberger (Salzburg); H. Haas (Schwarzach); F.J. Göbel (Siegen); R. Poier (Steyr); J. Treuner (Stuttgart); R. Schumacher (Schwerin); A. Feldges (St. Gallen); H. Rau (Trier); D. Niethammer (Tübingen); G. Hartmann (Ulm); D. Franke (Vechta); H. Gadner (Wien, St. Anna Kinderspital); F. Haschke (Wien); J. Weber (Wiesbaden); H.P. Krohn (Wilhelmshaven); J. Otte (Wolfsburg); A. Dohrn (Wuppertal); J. Kühl (Würzburg); H.J. Plüss (Zürich).

Pathologists.   H. Mittermeyer (Aachen); B. Stamm (Aarau); R. Backmann (Augsburg); H. Ohnacker (Basel); M. Stolte (Bayreuth); H. Stein (Berlin); M. Dietel (Berlin); W. Schneider (Berlin); H.J. Födisch, (Bonn); R. Donhuisen (Braunschweig); F.K. Köbeta ling (Bremen); J.O. Habeck (Chemnitz); P. Stosiek (Cottbus); E.W. Schwarze (Dortmund); M. Müller (Dresden); W. Hort (Düsseldorf); V. Becker (Erlangen); L.D. Leder (Essen); S. Falk (Frankfurt); H.E. Schäfer (Freiburg); W. Schultz (Giebeta en); E. Kunze (Göttingen); C. Schmid (Graz); G. Lorenz (Greifswald); F.W. Rath (Halle); U. Helmchen (Hamburg); A. Georgii (Hannover); F. Otto (Heidelberg); K. Remberger (Homburg); G. Mikuz (Innsbruck); D. Katenkamp (Jena); R. Wagner (Kaiserslautern); W. Gusek (Karlsruhe); O. Klinge (Kassel); R. Parwaresch (Kiel); W. Wagner (Klagenfurt); F. deLeon (Koblenz); R. Fischer (Köln); O.M. Gokel (Krefeld); C. Wittekind (Leipzig); G. Leitner (Leoben); M. Weber (Linz); E. Pedrinis (Locarno); K. Wegener (Ludwigshafen); A. Feller (Lübeck); J.O. Grebbers (Luzern); A. Roesser (Magdeburg); W. Thoenes (Mainz); U. Bleyl (Mannheim); C. Thomas (Marburg); E. Jehn (Minden); K. Wurster (München, Technical University); U. Löhrs (München); P. Meister (München-Harlaching); M. Grundmann (Münster); P.H. Wünsch (Nürnberg); H. Nizze (Rostock); H. Mitschke (Saarbrücken); O. Dietze (Salzburg); A. Hittmair (Schwarzach); G. Wittstock (Schwerin); D. Kunde (Siegen); A. Diener (St. Gallen); J. Feichtinger (Steyr); B. Kraus-Hounder (Stuttgart); H. Mäusle (Trier); P. Kaiserling (Tübingen); O. Haferkamp (Ulm); M. Respondek (Vechta); Th. Radasckiewicz (Wien); W. Remmle (Wiesbaden); G. Fischer (Wilhelmshaven); H.K. Müller-Hermelink (Würzburg); T. Stallmach (Zürich).

Reference Laboratories.   Pathology: Lymphnode Registry of the Society of German Pathologists, Institut of Hematopathology, University of Kiel (R. Parwaresch/M. Tiemann); Institut of Pathology, University of Vienna (T. Radasckiewicz/A. Chott). Immunophenotyping: W.-D. Ludwig, Berlin; W. Knapp, Vienna.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors acknowledge the expert work of Edelgard Odenwald (cytomorphology), Ulrike Meyer, U. Regelsberger (data management), and Eckehard Schirg (central diagnostic radiology). We thank Jennifer Meyers for proofreading the English text.


    FOOTNOTES

Submitted January 25, 1999; accepted July 7, 1999.

Supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe, Bonn, Grant-No.M109/91/Re1.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address reprint requests to Alfred Reiter, MD, Justice-Liebig-University, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Feulgenstrasse 12, D-353, Giessen, Germany; e-mail: alfred.reiter{at}paediat.med.uni-giessen.de.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
PATIENTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

1. Patte C, Philip T, Rodary C, Bernard A, Zucker JM, Bernard JL, Robert A, Rialland X, Benz-Lemoine E, Demeocq F, Bayle C, Lemerle J: Improved survival rate in children with stage III and IV B cell NHL and leukaemia using multi-agent chemotherapy: Results of a study of 114 children from the French Paediatric Oncology Society. J Clin Oncol 4:1219, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Patte C, Philip T, Rodary C, Zucker JM, Behrendt H, Gentet JC, Lamagnère JP, Otten J, Dufillot D, Pein F, Caillou B, Lemerle J: High survival rate in advanced-stage B-cell lymphomas and leukemias without CNS involvement with a short intensive polychemotherapy: Results from the French Pediatric Oncology Society of a randomized trial of 216 children. J Clin Oncol 9:123, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Müller-Weihrich S, Beck J, Henze G, Jobke A, Kornhuber B, Lampert F, Ludwig R, Prindull G, Schellong G, Spaar HJ, Stollmann B, Treuner J, Wahlen W, Weinel P, Riehm H: BFM-Studie 1981/83 zur Behandlung hoch maligner Non-Hodgkin-Lymphome bei Kindern: Ergebnisse einer nach histologisch-immunologischem Typ und Ausbreitungsstadium stratefizierten Therapie. Klin Pädiatr 196:135, 1984[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Murphy SB, Bowman WP, Abromowitch M, Mirro J, Ochs J, Rivera G, Pui CH, Fairclough D, Berard CW: Results of treatment of advanced-stage Burkitt's lymphoma and B cell (SIg+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia with high-dose fractionated cyclophosphamide and coordinated high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine. J Clin Oncol 4:1732, 1986[Abstract]

5. Reiter A, Schrappe M, Ludwig WD, Lampert F, Harbott J, Henze G, Niemeyer C, Gadner H, Müller-Weihrich St, Ritter J, Odenwald E, Riehm H: Favorable outcome of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood: A report of three consecutive studies of the BFM group. Blood 80:2471, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Reiter A, Schrappe M, Parwaresch R, Henze G, Müller-Weihrich S, Sauter S, Sykora K-W, Ludwig W-D, Gadner H, Riehm H: Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas of childhood and adolescence. Results of a treatment stratified for biological subtypes and stage. A report of the BFM group. J Clin Oncol 13:359, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Bowman WP, Shuster JJ, Cook B, Griffin T, Behm F, Pullen J, Link M, Head D, Carroll A, Berard C, Murphy S: Improved survival for children with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and stage IV small noncleaved-cell lymphoma: A Pediatric Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 14:1252, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Magrath I, Adde M, Shad A, Venzon D, Seibel N, Gootenberg J, Neely J, Arndt C, Nieder M, Jaffe E, Wittes RA, Horak ID: Adults and children with small non-cleaved-cell lymphoma have a similar excellent outcome when treated with the same chemotherapy regimen. J Clin Oncol 14:925, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Reiter A, Zimmermann W, Zimmermann M, v Schweinitz D, Riehm H, Mildenberger H: The role of initial laparotomy and second-look surgery in the treatment of abdominal B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of childhood. A report of the BFM group. Eur J Pediatr Surg 4:74, 1994[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Philip T, Hartmann O, Pinkerton R, Zucker JM, Gentet J-C, Lamagnere J-P, Berhendt H, Perel Y, Otten J, Lutz P, Rodary C, Caillou B, Bayle C, Chauvin F, Patte C: Curability of relapsed childhood B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma after intensive first line therapy: A report from the Société Francaise d'Oncologie Pédiatrique. Blood 81:2003, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Murphy SB: Classification, staging and end results of treatment in childhood non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Dissimilarities from lymphomas in adults. Semin Oncol 7:332, 1980[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Magrath I, Lee YJ, Anderson T, Henle W, Ziegler J, Simon R, Schein P: Prognostic factors in Burkitt's lymphoma: Importance of total tumor burden. Cancer 45:1507, 1980[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Hagberg H, Killander A, Sominsson B: Serum-beta 2-microglobulin in malignant lymphoma. Cancer 51:2220, 1983[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Pui CH, Ip SH, Kung P, Dodge RK, Berard CW, Crist WM, Murphy SB: High serum interleukin-2 receptor levels are related to advanced disease and a poor outcome in childhood non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood 70:624, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Goldie JH, Coldman AJ: The genetic origin of drug resistance in neoplasms: Implications for systemic therapy. Cancer Res 44:3643, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Murphy SB, Fairclough DL, Hutchison RE, Berard CW: Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas of childhood: An analysis of the histology, staging and response to treatment of 338 cases at a single institution. J Clin Oncol 7:186, 1989[Abstract]

17. Stansfeld AG, Diebold J, Kapanci Y, Kelenyi G, Lennert K, Mioduszewska O, Noel H, Rilke F, Sundström C, van Unnik JAM, Wright DH: Updated Kiel Classification for lymphomas. Lancet 1:292, 1988[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Stein H, Banks PM, Chan JKC, Cleary ML, Delsol G, De Wolf-Peeters C, Falini B, Gatter KC, Grogan TM, Isaacson PG, Knowles DM, Mason CY, Müller-Hermelink HK, Pileri SA, Piris MA, Ralfkiaer E, Warnke RA: A revised European-American classification of lymphoid neoplasms: A proposal from the International Lymphoma Study Group. Blood 84:1361, 1994[Free Full Text]

19. Ludwig WD, Bartram CR, Ritter J, Raghavachar A, Hiddemann W, Heil G, Harbott J, Seibt-Jung H, Teichmann JV, Riehm H: Ambiguous phenotypes and genotypes in 16 children as characterized by multiparameter analysis. Blood 71:1518, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DAG, Gralnick HR, Sultan C: Proposals for the classification of the acute leukemias. French-American-British (FAB) co-operative group. Br J Haematol 33:451, 1976[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Klinische Chemie: Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Klinische Chemie (DGKC). J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 10:182, 1972

22. Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457, 1958

23. Mantel N: Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:163, 1966[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Cox DR: Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc 34:187, 1972

25. Pinkerton CR, Hann I, Eden OB, Gerrard M, Berry J, Mott MG: Outcome in stage III non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in children (UKCCSG study NHL 86)---How much treatment is needed? Br J Cancer 64:583, 1991[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Helardot PG, Wakim A, Kalifa C, Leclere J, Lacombe MJ, Patte C: Abdominal residual masses in non Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) surgical and pathological findings---Correlation with the evolution. Med Pediatr Oncol 21:534, 1993

27. Gentet JC, Patte C, Quintana E, Bergeron C, Rubie H, Pein F, Demaille MC, Philip T, Raybaud C: Phase II study of Cytarabine and Etoposide in child ren with refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: A study of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology. J Clin Oncol 8:661, 1990[Abstract]

28. Philip T, Hartmann O, Biron P, Cahn JY, Pein F, Bordigoni P, Souillet G, Gart ner M, Lasset C, Chauvin F: High-dose therapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation in partial remission after first-line induction therapy for diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 6:1118, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Link MP, Shuster JJ, Donaldson SS, Berard CW, Murphy SB: Treatment of children and young adults with early-stage non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 337:1259, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Magrath I: Limiting therapy for limited childhood non-Hodgkin`s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 337:1304, 1997[Free Full Text]

31. Hoorweg-Nijman JJ, Delemarre-van de Waal HA, deWaal FC, Behrendt H: Cyclophosphamide-induced disturbance of gonadotropin secretion manifesting testicular damage. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 126:143, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. La Quaglia MP, Stolar CJH, Krailo M, Exelby P, Siegel S, Meadows A, Hammond D: The role of surgery in abdominal non-Hodgki n's lymphoma: Experience from the Childrens Cancer Study Group. J Pediatr Surg 27:230, 1992[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Patte C, Michon J, Behrendt H, Leverger G, Bergeron C, Robert A, Mechinaud F, Bertrand Y, Perel Y, Coze C, Nelken B: Results of the LMB 89 protocol for childhood B-cell lymphoma and leukemia (ALL). Study of the SFOP (French Pediatric Oncology Society). Med Pediatr Oncol 27:358, 1997

34. Shapiro WR, Young DF, Mehta BM: Methotrexate: Distribution in cerebrospinal fluid after intravenous, ventricular and lumbar injections. N Engl J Med 293:161, 1975[Abstract]

35. Bleyer WA, Poplack DG, Simon RM: "Concentration x time" methotrexate via a subcutaneous reservoir: A less toxic regimen for intraventricular chemotherapy of central nervous system neoplasms. Blood 51:835, 1978[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Welte K, Reiter A, Mempel K, Pfetsch M, Schwab G, Schrappe M, Riehm H: A randomized phase III study of the efficacy of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 87:3143, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Patte C, Michon J, Laplance A, Eyer D, Robert A, Perel Y, Bergeron C, Vic P, Coze C: Results of a randomised trial on prophylactic G-CSF during induction treatment of non-Hodkgin's lymphoma. Med Pediatr Oncol 29:360, 1997

38. Sakiroglu C, Patte C, Michon J, Ansoborlo S, Plouvier E, Babin-Boilletot A, Baruchel A: Use of uricozyme® and occurrence of metabolic problems during inital phase of the LMB 89 protocol. Med Pediatr Oncol 29:331,

39. Pui CH, Relling MV, Lascombes F, Harrison PL, Struxiano A, Mondesir JM, Ribeiro RC, Sandlund JT, Rivera GK, Evans WE, Mahmoud HH: Urate oxidase in prevention and treatment of hyperuricemia associated with lymphoid malignancies. Leukemia 11:1813, 1997[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Cairo M, Krailo M, Morse M, Hutchinson R, Harris R, Kjeldsberg C, Kadin M, Radel E, Steinherz L, Meadows A: Disseminated non-lymphoblastic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (DNLNHL) of childhood: A randomized phase II trial of short intensive treatment. Ann Oncol 7:29, 1996

41. Atra A, Gerrard M, Hobson R, Imeson JD, Ashley S, Pinkerton CR: Improved cure rate in children with B-cell acute lympohoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) and stage IV B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL)---Results of the UKCCSG 9003 protocol. Br J Cancer 77:2281, 1998[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

42. Brecher ML, Schwenn MR, Coppes MJ, Bowman WP, Link MP, Berard CW, Shuster JJ, Murphy SB: Fractionated cyclophosphamide and back to back high dose methotrexate and cytosine araginoside improves outcome in patients with stage III high grade small non-cleaved cell lymphomas (SNCCL): A randomized trial of the Pediatric Oncology Group. Med Pedeatr Oncol 29:526, 1997[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


© 1999 by The American Society of Hematology.
 
0006-4971/99/9410-0012$3.00/0

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anticancer ResHome page
M. JAGER, C. ZILKENS, B. WESTHOFF, E. M. JELINEK, G. KOZINA, and R. KRAUSPE
Efficiency of Iloprost Treatment for Chemotherapy-associated Osteonecrosis after Childhood Cancer
Anticancer Res, August 1, 2009; 29(8): 3433 - 3440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
D. Shafer, H. Wu, T. Al-Saleem, K. Reddy, H. Borghaei, S. Lessin, and M. Smith
Cutaneous Precursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma in 2 Adult Patients: Clinicopathologic and Molecular Cytogenetic Studies With a Review of the Literature
Arch Dermatol, September 1, 2008; 144(9): 1155 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
W. Klapper, M. Szczepanowski, B. Burkhardt, H. Berger, M. Rosolowski, S. Bentink, C. Schwaenen, S. Wessendorf, R. Spang, P. Moller, et al.
Molecular profiling of pediatric mature B-cell lymphoma treated in population-based prospective clinical trials
Blood, August 15, 2008; 112(4): 1374 - 1381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
S. Schwartz, K. Borner, K. Muller, P. Martus, L. Fischer, A. Korfel, T. Auton, and E. Thiel
Glucarpidase (Carboxypeptidase G2) Intervention in Adult and Elderly Cancer Patients with Renal Dysfunction and Delayed Methotrexate Elimination After High-Dose Methotrexate Therapy
Oncologist, November 1, 2007; 12(11): 1299 - 1308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. Cooney-Qualter, M. Krailo, A. Angiolillo, R. A. Fawwaz, G. Wiseman, L. Harrison, V. Kohl, P. C. Adamson, J. Ayello, C. vande Ven, et al.
A Phase I Study of 90Yttrium-Ibritumomab-Tiuxetan in Children and Adolescents with Relapsed/Refractory CD20-Positive Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Children's Oncology Group Study
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 13(18): 5652s - 5660s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Salzburg, B. Burkhardt, M. Zimmermann, O. Wachowski, W. Woessmann, I. Oschlies, W. Klapper, H.-H. Wacker, W.-D. Ludwig, F. Niggli, et al.
Prevalence, Clinical Pattern, and Outcome of CNS Involvement in Childhood and Adolescent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Differ by Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Subtype: A Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Group Report
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3915 - 3922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Patte, A. Auperin, M. Gerrard, J. Michon, R. Pinkerton, R. Sposto, C. Weston, M. Raphael, S. L. Perkins, K. McCarthy, et al.
Results of the randomized international FAB/LMB96 trial for intermediate risk B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in children and adolescents: it is possible to reduce treatment for the early responding patients
Blood, April 1, 2007; 109(7): 2773 - 2780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. S. Cairo, M. Gerrard, R. Sposto, A. Auperin, C. R. Pinkerton, J. Michon, C. Weston, S. L. Perkins, M. Raphael, K. McCarthy, et al.
Results of a randomized international study of high-risk central nervous system B non-Hodgkin lymphoma and B acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and adolescents
Blood, April 1, 2007; 109(7): 2736 - 2743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
A. Reiter
Diagnosis and Treatment of Childhood Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Hematology, January 1, 2007; 2007(1): 285 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
J. T. Sandlund
Should Adolescents with NHL Be Treated as Old Children or Young Adults?
Hematology, January 1, 2007; 2007(1): 297 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. T. Wong
Management of Central Nervous System Lymphomas Using Monoclonal Antibodies: Challenges and Opportunities
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 7151s - 7157s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. H. Laver, J. M. Kraveka, R. E. Hutchison, M. Chang, J. Kepner, M. Schwenn, N. Tarbell, S. Desai, S. Weitzman, H. J. Weinstein, et al.
Advanced-Stage Large-Cell Lymphoma in Children and Adolescents: Results of a Randomized Trial Incorporating Intermediate-Dose Methotrexate and High-Dose Cytarabine in the Maintenance Phase of the APO Regimen: A Pediatric Oncology Group Phase III Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2005; 23(3): 541 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S. Smeland, A. K. Blystad, S. O. Kvaloy, I. M. Ikonomou, J. Delabie, G. Kvalheim, J. Hammerstrom, G. F. Lauritzsen, and H. Holte
Treatment of Burkitt's/Burkitt-like lymphoma in adolescents and adults: a 20-year experience from the Norwegian Radium Hospital with the use of three successive regimens
Ann. Onc., July 1, 2004; 15(7): 1072 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
H. Pels, I. G.H. Schmidt-Wolf, A. Glasmacher, H. Schulz, A. Engert, V. Diehl, A. Zellner, G. Schackert, H. Reichmann, F. Kroschinsky, et al.
Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Results of a Pilot and Phase II Study of Systemic and Intraventricular Chemotherapy With Deferred Radiotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol., December 15, 2003; 21(24): 4489 - 4495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. A. Karajannis, M. Hummel, I. Oschlies, I. Anagnostopoulos, M. Zimmermann, H. Stein, R. Parwaresch, and A. Reiter
Epstein-Barr virus infection in Western European pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphomas
Blood, December 1, 2003; 102(12): 4244 - 4244.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
K. Seidemann, M. Tiemann, I. Lauterbach, G. Mann, I. Simonitsch, K. Stankewitz, M. Schrappe, M. Zimmermann, C. Niemeyer, R. Parwaresch, et al.
Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma With Sclerosis in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients: Treatment and Results From Three Therapeutic Studies of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Group
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2003; 21(9): 1782 - 1789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. Hollender, S. Kvaloy, O. Nome, E. Skovlund, K. Lote, and H. Holte
Central nervous system involvement following diagnosis of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a risk model
Ann. Onc., July 1, 2002; 13(7): 1099 - 1107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
I. Magrath
Molecular Characteristics of Diffuse Large-B-Cell Lymphoma
N. Engl. J. Med., June 20, 2002; 346(25): 1998 - 1999.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
F. Spreafico, M. Massimino, R. Luksch, M. Casanova, G. S. Cefalo, P. Collini, A. Ferrari, D. Polastri, M. Terenziani, M. Gasparini, et al.
Intensive, Very Short-Term Chemotherapy for Advanced Burkitt's Lymphoma in Children
J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2002; 20(12): 2783 - 2788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Patte, A. Laplanche, A. I. Bertozzi, A. Baruchel, D. Frappaz, C. Schmitt, F. Mechinaud, B. Nelken, P. Boutard, and J. Michon
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Induction Treatment of Children With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Randomized Study of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology
J. Clin. Oncol., January 15, 2002; 20(2): 441 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
A. Lister, L. E. Abrey, and J. T. Sandlund
Central Nervous System Lymphoma
Hematology, January 1, 2002; 2002(1): 283 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Patte, A. Auperin, J. Michon, H. Behrendt, G. Leverger, D. Frappaz, P. Lutz, C. Coze, Y. Perel, M. Raphael, et al.
The Societe Francaise d'Oncologie Pediatrique LMB89 protocol: highly effective multiagent chemotherapy tailored to the tumor burden and initial response in 561 unselected children with B-cell lymphomas and L3 leukemia
Blood, June 1, 2001; 97(11): 3370 - 3379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. A. Lones, S. L. Perkins, R. Sposto, M. E. Kadin, C. R. Kjeldsberg, J. F. Wilson, and M. S. Cairo
Large-Cell Lymphoma Arising in the Mediastinum in Children and Adolescents Is Associated With an Excellent Outcome: A Children's Cancer Group Report
J. Clin. Oncol., November 15, 2000; 18(22): 3845 - 3853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reiter, A.
Right arrow Articles by Riehm, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reiter, A.
Right arrow Articles by Riehm, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Trials and Observations
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 1999 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020